Post on 11-Apr-2018
1� 2005 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery
doi:10.1510/mmcts.2004.000349
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)pleurodesis for pneumothorax
Calvin S.H. Nga, Gaetano Roccob, Anthony P.C. Yima,*
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Walesa
Hospital, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong SAR, ChinaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdomb
Spontaneous pneumothorax is a common condition that impacts significantly on healthcareexpenditure. Its optimal management, however, remains a subject of considerable contro-versy. The proven safety and efficacy of minimal access video-assisted thoracic surgery(VATS) has changed the way we manage this condition. We present VATS pleurodesis util-izing the endoscopic stapling technique for the management of spontaneous pneumothorax.
Keywords: Spontaneous pneumothorax; Thoracoscopy; Video-assisted thoracic surgery(VATS)
Photo 1. Thoracoscopic image of apical blebs in patient with spon-taneous pneumothorax.
Introduction
Thoracoscopy, without video assistance and per-formed under local anesthesia has been practiced byEuropean pulmonologists for almost a century. Sattlerwas credited to be the first to identify bullae in apatient with spontaneous pneumothorax using thor-acoscopy and reported this in 1937 w1x. The devel-opment of solid state systems and microcameras inthe 1980s preceded the advent of video-assisted tho-racic surgery (VATS) in the 1990s. While thoracoscopyallows simple observation and talc poudrage, VATSpermits procedures like mechanical pleurodesis, pleu-rectomy and bullectomy. There is excellent consensusamong the surgeons that VATS (which commonlyinclude bullectomy and either mechanical pleurodesisor partial pleurectomy) is the approach of choice whenan interventional procedure is considered necessaryw2x. We routinely perform blebectomy or bullectomywhen it can be identified thoracoscopically (Photos 1and 2). Furthermore, patients who underwent isolatedVATS pleurodesis, without apical resection were asso-
* Corresponding author: Tel.: q852-26-322629; fax: q852-26-478273.E-mail: yimap@cuhk.edu.hk
ciated with a much higher rate of recurrence com-pared to when the resection was performed w2x. Wegenerally avoid pleurectomy and prefer pleurodesis,not only because bleeding is more common in theformer but also because there is a chance thatthese patients may need lung surgery, and prior pleu-
2
C.S.H. Ng et al. / Multimedia Manual of Cardiothoracic Surgery / doi:10.1510/mmcts.2004.000349
Photo 2. Thoracoscopic image of multiple apical bulla in patientwith spontaneous pneumothorax.
Video 1. Adhesions are taken down and haemostasis secured withdiathermy. Extra care is required for apical adhesions to avoid injuryto the subclavian vessels.
Video 2. A small ruptured bleb may be difficult to identify.
rectomy would seriously complicate future surgicalmanagement.
With the lowered morbidity of VATS, the accepted sur-gical indications for pneumothorax include persistentair leak, recurrence, radiologically demonstrated hugebulla, spontaneous hemopneumothorax, incompleteexpansion of the lung, tension pneumothorax, bilat-eral involvement and SP in a high-risk occupation,
such as pilot or scuba diver w2x. Some authors haveeven recommended VATS for uncomplicated first timepneumothorax, which we currently do not advocate.However, there remain considerable controversies onissues such as the duration of persistent air leak andthe number of recurrences before surgery is deemedappropriate. A recent consensus from the AmericanCollege of Chest Physicians recommended the obser-vation of air leaks for 4 days prior to surgical inter-vention w3x. Our experience supports the use of VATSwhen persistent air leak is present for more than 3days, and on the second admission for SP w2x.
Surgical preparation and technique
The general strategies to VATS are similar to thosedescribed in our other contribution (see Ng CSH andYim APC. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery(VATS) bullectomy for emphysematous/bullous lungdisease – doi: 10.1510/mmcts.2004.000265).
Surgical procedure
1. Incision and port placement
The incision and port sites are similar to thosedescribed in our other contribution (see Ng CSH andYim APC. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery(VATS) bullectomy for emphysematous/bullous lungdisease – doi:10.1510/mmcts.2004.000265).
2. Exploration
The entire hemithorax should be inspected. Bluntatraumatic instruments (sponge-holding forceps)should be used for manipulation of the lung tissue.Adhesions should all be taken down to achieve agood operating field. Haemostasis is secured withdiathermy for any adhesion bands. Special attentionis needed for dividing apical adhesions because of theproximity of the subclavian vessels (Video 1). Thepresence of subpleural bullae has been reported tobe present in 76 to 100% of primary spontaneouspneumothorax patients during video-assisted thora-coscopic surgery w2x. The whole lung surface, partic-ularly at the apex and the lung edges, should becarefully searched for blebs and bullae. In a collapsedlung, a small bleb especially when ruptured (Video 2)can be difficult to identify. If left behind, these blebscould lead to recurrence.
3. Endoscopic stapled blebectomy/bullectomy
The endoscopic stapler resection line, which shouldbe across healthy lung tissue, is marked by sponge-
3
C.S.H. Ng et al. / Multimedia Manual of Cardiothoracic Surgery / doi:10.1510/mmcts.2004.000349
Video 3. The target region with blebs or bullae is identified, andendoscopic stapled blebectomy/bullectomy is performed.
Video 4. During endoscopic stapled blebectomy/bullectomy, it isimportant to ensure the continuity of each staple line to prevent airleak. The resected abnormal wedge of lung is removed.
Video 5. Endoscopic Marlex mesh mechanical pleurodesis is per-formed to the whole pleural cavity including the diaphragmaticsurface.
Video 6. Endoscopic endo-loop bulla ligation performed using apre-tied commercial endo-loop or by a homemade polydioxanoneloop.
holding forceps. Endoscopic stapled blebectomy/bul-lectomy is performed, ensuring that there is continuityof each staple line to prevent air leak (Video 3).Crossing of staples is to be avoided, and only gentle
traction should be applied to prevent tearing of thelung. The resected lung wedge can best be retrievedthrough the anterior port with the wider intercostalsspace (Video 4). In our experience, the division of theinferior pulmonary ligament is generally not requiredunless a very large apical lung wedge is resected withthe bleb or bulla.
4. Mechanical pleurodesis
A piece of rolled up Marlex mesh is mounted at theend of the endoscopic grasper, and mechanical pleu-rodesis is performed to the whole pleural cavityincluding the diaphragmatic surface (Video 5). Partic-ular attention should be paid to ensure mechanicalpleurodesis is thoroughly performed at the apical andlateral regions of the pleural cavity. It is important tocheck that the piece of mesh covers the entire tip ofthe endoscopic grasper to prevent injury. Further-more, extra care is needed at the apex to avoid injuryto the subclavian vessels.
5. End of the procedure
The areas of adhesiolysis and port sites are inspectedfor bleeding and hemostasis secured with diathermy.Through the inferior port site, a 24Fr chest drain ispositioned under direct videoscopic vision to the apexand to lie antero-laterally in the pleural cavity. The lungis then reinflated under direct vision, and layered clo-sure of the stab wounds complete the operation. Wedo not routinely check for airleak from the staple line.
Other techniques for managing blebs/bullae
1. Endoloop ligation
Endoscopic endoloop bulla ligation can be suitable forbulla in primary and secondary SP w4x. It is performedusing a pre-tied commercial endo-loop or by a home-made polydioxanone loop (Video 6). Homemadedevices are, of course, more cost effective. However,a known complication of endoloop ligation is the acci-dental slipping off of the loop during lung expansionor after a forceful sneeze. The problem can be mini-mized by the placement of a double or triple looparound each bulla w5,6x. Furthermore, a small metalclip can be applied to prevent loosening of the endo-loop knot (Video 7).
2. Endoscopic suturing
Video-assisted thoracoscopic suturing of apical bullaewith mechanical pleurodesis has been shown to be a
4
C.S.H. Ng et al. / Multimedia Manual of Cardiothoracic Surgery / doi:10.1510/mmcts.2004.000349
Video 7. Placement of a double loop around each bulla can preventaccidental falling off of the loop. A metal clip can be applied toprevent loosening of the endo-loop knot.
Photo 3. Endoscopic suturing of bleb is performed using conven-tional surgical instruments.
Photo 5. The ends of the sutures are tied and bleb has beenplicated.
Video 8. Argon beam coagulation of multiple blebs.
Photo 4. The long conventional needle holder and standardmonofilament polypropylene sutures used.
viable alternative to endoscopic stapled bullectomywith mechanical pleurodesis w7,8x. Parenteral narcoticrequirement, chest drainage duration, hospital stayand pneumothorax recurrence were similar for bothtechniques w7,8x. To minimize cost, the long conven-tional needle holder and standard monofilament poly-propylene sutures used were found to be as effectiveas the specialized endoscopic suturing equipment forthoracoscopic suturing of bullae (Photos 3, 4 and 5).Therefore, in view of the high cost of staple-cutters,endoscopic suturing of apical bullae should be con-sidered in selected cases of small localized bullae forPSP w7,8x. However, it must be emphasized thatendoscopic suturing should be performed by sur-geons adequately trained in the skill.
3. Argon beam coagulator
Argon beam coagulation (ABC) is less effective thanstapled, suturing or endo-loop ligation bullectomy inseveral patient series w7,8x. Patients treated with ABChad more post-operative prolonged air leaks (-10days), as well as pneumothorax recurrences w7,8x.Therefore, the consensus is that ABC should not
5
C.S.H. Ng et al. / Multimedia Manual of Cardiothoracic Surgery / doi:10.1510/mmcts.2004.000349
Video 9. A roticulating endograsper is used to suspend the targetparenchymal area cranially. Subsequently, a roticulating endostapleris positioned just caudal to the lesion to be removed.
Video 10. Endoscopic bleb/bullectomy is performed and the endo-grasper repositioned more distally upon each firing. Roticulatingendoscissors are used to divide tissue not separated after stapling.Specimen is removed by endobag or directly by Roberts clamp.
Video 11. An electrocautery scratch-pad mounted on Robertsclamp is used for mechanical pleurodesis. This maneuver can cre-ate a tear in the parietal pleura where pleurectomy can be initiatedwith endo kittner.
be used as the primary treatment modality for SP(Video 8).
The uniportal VATS technique
Recently, Rocco et al. described the uniportal VATStechnique for the management of spontaneous pneu-mothorax. Usually, an incision of 2 to 2.5 cm is madefor uniportal VATS; if the chest cavity has beendrained before, the same incision where the chestdrain has been inserted can be used w9x. The port siteis created directly anterior to the scapular line (see
Rocco G. Endoscopic VATS sympathectomy: the uni-portal technique – doi: 10.1510/mmcts.2004.000323).
After thorough inspection of the lung for any emphy-sematous changes, the target area is usually identifiedat the upper lobe apex or at the apical segment of thelower lobe (Video 9). A roticulating endograsper (Roti-culator Endograsp, MMCTSLink 10) is introduced par-allel to the videothoracoscope in such way as tosuspend the target parenchymal area cranially. Sub-sequently, a roticulating endostapler (Endo GIA Roti-culator, MMCTSLink 15) is inserted on the oppositeside of the videothoracoscope through the same inci-sion. The jaws of the endostapler are opened insidethe chest and positioned just caudal to the lesion tobe removed. This maneuver is facilitated by having theendograsper ‘‘present’’ the parenchymal area to theendostapler which can then be gently pushed intoposition prior to firing.
The endostapler is fired and the endograsper reposi-tioned more distally onto the remaining lung to beresected (Video 10). Serial firings (up to three) are usu-ally needed to remove all diseased lung tissue. Shoulda bridge of parenchyma remain to hold the specimenin place, a roticulating endoscissors can also be intro-duced. At this point the specimen can be removedeither through an endobag (EndoCatch, MMCTSLink16) or directly by using a long Roberts clamp.
A simple electrocautery scratch-pad, secured with along stitch to facilitate its retrieval and mounted onthe same Roberts clamp, is used to start the parietalpleural abrasion (Video 11). This maneuver is meantto create a tear in the parietal pleura from where aformal pleurectomy can be initiated with the aid of anendo kittner. Alternatively, a pleural abrasion can beperformed throughout the chest cavity.
Technical considerations
Complication associated with the technique includeair leak from the staple line, particularly when there iscrossing of staple lines w5x. Furthermore, we have pre-viously reported endoscopic staple cutter malfunc-tioning as a potential hazard w6x. We normally keepthe chest drain on continuous 15 cmH2O suction forat least 24 h before considering removal to allow pleu-rodesis. Any pleural airspace in the early post-oper-ative period should be dealt with aggressively, forexample by increasing suction pressure or reposition-ing the drain to allow full lung expansion, becausepleural apposition is the key to effective pleurodesis.Similarly, avoiding air leak into the pleural space dur-ing chest drain removal is also important. wNg CSH,Yim APC. Insertion of Chest Drain Guidelines: Other
6
C.S.H. Ng et al. / Multimedia Manual of Cardiothoracic Surgery / doi:10.1510/mmcts.2004.000349
Tab
le1.
VATS
for
spon
tane
ous
pne
umot
hora
x
Aut
hors
Cas
eP
atie
ntB
leb
s/b
ulla
eS
tap
led
End
oloo
p/
Ab
rasi
onP
rolo
nged
Mea
nM
ean
orS
Pd
escr
iptio
nN
o.se
enat
VATS
bul
lect
omy
end
o-p
leur
odes
isp
ost-
hosp
itals
tay
med
ian
follo
w-
recu
rren
ce(%
)su
turin
g/(%
)op
erat
ive
air
ind
ays
upin
mon
ths
(%)
AB
Cle
ak(%
)(r
ange
)(r
ange
)
Yim
w7x
PS
P48
387
196
261/
35/6
100
33
(1–3
0)20
(1–3
6)1.
7(1
997)
(alo
nein
20ca
ses)
Liu
w8x
PS
P&
757
8931
235
2/52
/6(a
lone
in4
4.5
30(1
–60)
2.1
(199
9)S
SP
49ca
ses)
()10
day
s)(0
–27)
Hat
zw1
3xP
SP
&P
SP
:95
NA
109
034
2.8
PS
P:
4(2
–14)
53(2
–86)
4.6
(200
0)S
SP
SS
P:
14(a
lone
in72
)()
2d
ays)
SS
P:
8(1
–18)
Aye
dw1
1xP
SP
7278
560
546.
94
42(3
6–5
4)5.
5(2
000)
()5
day
s)(fr
omga
uze
abra
sion
)Lo
uban
iw12
xP
SP
49N
A52
00
NA
6.8/
4.8
38(3
6–4
0)20
/4(2
000)
("ac
rom
ycin
)C
ard
illo
w10x
PS
P43
278
235
104/
0/0
01.
46
38(2
–72)
4.4
(200
0)()
5d
ays)
Cha
nw1
4xP
SP
82N
AN
AN
A/0
/010
0N
AN
A44
(8–8
5)5.
7(2
001)
AB
C,
argo
nb
eam
coag
ulat
ion;
NA
,d
ata
not
avai
lab
le;
PS
P,p
rimar
ysp
onta
neou
sp
neum
otho
rax;
SS
P,se
cond
ary
spon
tane
ous.
Experiences. Thorax 8th Aug 2003. http://tho-rax.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/58/suppl–2/ii53x
Results
At experienced centres the recurrence rate after VATShas consistently been reported to be as low as treat-ment via thoracotomy w5–8,10x (Table 1). Missed bul-lae and more conservative surgical procedures maylead to more frequent recurrences. Some evidencesuggests that apical lung excision, even in theabsence of visible lesion, may reduce spontaneouspneumothorax recurrence w11x.
Stapled bullectomy is a safe and reliable method,which is unlikely to be complicated by prolonged airleak and pneumothorax recurrence, particularly whenused with a form of pleurodesis w7,8,12,13x. Abrasionpleurodesis is preferred by ourselves, which is oftenperformed with Marlex� mesh w7,8,13x. Abrasion pleu-rodesis with dry gauze is less effective and has higherrecurrence in the treatment of spontaneous pneumo-thorax w11x. Thorough pleural abrasion remains thekey for reducing pneumothorax recurrence w5,6x.Some reports have suggested apical pleurectomymay be marginally better at preventing recurrencesthan abrasion pleurodesis w11,14x although the risk ofbleeding and post-operative neuralgia is higher w14x,and it is likely to make future thoracic surgery difficult.The results from endo-loop bullous ligation in termsof post-operative prolonged air leak, hospital stay andpneumothorax recurrence has been generally com-parable with other bullectomy procedures, particularlywhen applied to small bullae, w7,8x although Cardilloet al. reported higher recurrence with endo-loop liga-tion compared to stapled bullectomy w10x. On thewhole, endo-loop bullous ligation is viable, safe andcost effective in selected cases.
In secondary pneumothorax, treatment by VATSresulted in similar post-operative prolonged air leakand recurrence when compared with thoracotomy orprimary spontaneous pneumothorax treated by VATS(Table 1) w8,13x. However, the length of hospital staywas longer (mean 8 days) for secondary spontaneouspneumothorax patients treated by VATS when com-pared with primary spontaneous pneumothorax (mean4 days) w13x.
References
w1x Sattler A. Zur Behandlung der Spontan-pneumothorax mit besonnnberer Beruck-
7
C.S.H. Ng et al. / Multimedia Manual of Cardiothoracic Surgery / doi:10.1510/mmcts.2004.000349
sichtigung der Thorakoskopie. Beitr Klin TuberkSpezif Tuberkuloseforsch 1937;89:394–408.
w2x Yim APC, Ng CSH. Thoracoscopic managementof spontaneous pneumothorax. Curr Opin PulmMed 2001;7:210–214.
w3x Baumann MH, Strange C, Heffner JE, Light R,Kirby TJ, Klein J, Luketich JD, Panacek EA, SahnSA, AACP Pneumothorax Consensus Group.Management of spontaneous pneumothorax. AnAmerican College of Chest Physicians DelphiConsensus Statement. Chest 2001;119:590–602.
w4x Liu HP, Chang CH, Lin PJ, Chu JJ, Hsieh MJ. Analternative technique in the management ofbullous emphysema thoracoscopic endo-loopligation of bulla. Chest 1997;111:489.
w5x Yim APC. Negative outcomes following video-assisted thoracic surgery. Asian CardiovascThorac Ann 1996;4:133–138.
w6x Yim APC, Liu HP. Complications and failures ofvideo-assisted thoracic surgery: experience fromtwo centres in Asia. Ann Thorac Surg1996;61:538–541.
w7x Yim APC, Liu HP. Video-assisted thoracoscopicmanagement of primary spontaneous pneumo-thorax. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1997;7:236–240.
w8x Liu HP, Yim APC, Izzat BM, Lin PJ, Chang CH.
Thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneouspneumothorax. World J Surg 1999;23:1133–1136.
w9x Rocco G, Martin-Ucar A, Passera E. Uniportalwedge pulmonary resections. Annals of ThoracicSurgery 2004;77:726–728.
w10x Cardillo G, Facciolo F, Giunti R, Gasparri R,Lopergolo M, Orsetti R, Martelli M. Video-thoracoscopic treatment of primary spontaneouspneumothorax: a 6-year experience. Ann ThoracSurg 2000;69:357–361.
w11x Ayed AK, Al-Din HJ. The results of thoracoscopicsurgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax.Chest 2000;118:235–238.
w12x Loubani M, Lynch V. Video assisted thoraco-scopic bullectomy and acromycin pleurodesis: aneffective treatment for spontaneous pneumo-thorax. Respir Med 2000;94:888–890.
w13x Hatz RA, Kaps MF, Meimarakis G, Loehe F, MullerC, Furst H. Long-term results after video-assistedthoracoscopic surgery for first-time and recurrentspontaneous pneumothorax. Ann Thorac Surg2000;70:253–257.
w14x Chan P, Clarke P, Daniel FJ, Knight SR,Seevanayagam S. Efficacy study of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery pleurodesis forspontaneous pneumothorax. Ann Thorac Surg2001;71:452–454.