Post on 23-Feb-2016
description
Variables of Math Innovation: The Story of MS 223
Facilitated by Ramon Gonzalez
Background of MS 223
•The previous school, IS 149, had been named the most dangerous middle school building in 2002 out of 489 schools. School was slated to close in 2005.•Average Math test scores for X149 in 2002 were 7% proficiency.•MS 223 was founded in April 2003 to replace IS 149. The students who had selected IS 149 were expected to go to MS 223.•MS 223: The Laboratory School of Finance and Technology started with 9 new teachers, new principal, and new secretary.
The journey began with current best practices and quality research
•Model innovation based on research.•Move from traditional six classes of math to 10 classes of math•Move from a mathematics curriculum of procedural knowledge to inquiry and investigations•Hired a part time mathematics coach•Create real world application of math- school economy•MS 223 students scored 13% on the New York State Math Exam in 2004
Move from a model of remediation to acceleration
•Revamp city curriculum to introduce Algebra in the 6th grade•Require curriculum maps, Understanding by Design, inter-visitations and school visits•Move to a full time math coach and created grade team and subject team meetings•Designed diagnostics in mathematics that occur three times a year on each grade•Create school bank•MS 223 students scored 12% on the New York State Mathematics Exam in 2005
Expand Math Instruction and Quality of Teacher Staff
•Average years of teacher experience was 3 years•Partnership with NYU and Columbia to recruit top teachers and reduce class sizes•Expand Algebra Instruction through the 7th grade•Create Intervention classes that meet three times a week for 50 minutes•Use mastery sheets for each math skill level•Create school jobs based on school bucks•MS 223 students scored 29% on the New York State Mathematics Exam in 2006
Rigorous Growth
New York State Regents Exam in Mathematics 2008-2011
2008
2009
2010
2011
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
NYCDistrict 7MS 223
Math Scores from 2004-2011
% profi
cient
04
% profi
cient
05
% profi
cient
06
% profi
cient0
7
% profi
cient
08
% profi
cient
09
%profici
ent 1
0
%profici
ent 1
10
102030405060708090
100
Grade SixGrade SevenGrade Eight
2010- cut scores were raised.
Math Scores including City, Borough and District Scores 2006-2011
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
MS 223DistrictBoroughCity
All Students
Math Scores including City, Borough and District Scores 2006-2011
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
CityBoroughDistrictMS 223
Special Education Students
Math Scores including City, Borough and District Scores 2006-2011
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
MS 223DistrictBoroughCity
English Language Learners
Summary of Innovations: Relationships, Relationships, Relationships
Targeted Intervention StrategiesPersonalization of the math instructionApplication of math topicsMovement from procedural to inquiry and investigationFlexible planning time Use of the arts as a reform toolDifferent groupings and configurationsSchool climate surveyProfessional coaching in mathematicsScheduling for successFun events-Pi Day, Math Olympics, Budgeting Project, Career Day, Mentoring, and Finance Trips