Utrf@tennessee.com Ziling (Ben) Xue, Ph.D. Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee,...

Post on 22-Dec-2015

218 views 2 download

Transcript of Utrf@tennessee.com Ziling (Ben) Xue, Ph.D. Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee,...

utrf@tennessee.com

Ziling (Ben) Xue, Ph.D.Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee,

Knoxville

SIMPLE OPTICAL SENSOR FOR BIODIESEL

CONTAMINANT IN JET FUEL

Jonathan K. Fong; Roberto A. Federico-Perez

utrf.tennessee.edu

2

utrf.tennessee.edu

3

utrf.tennessee.edu

4

• Sharing distribution systems with jet fuel

• Surface-active biodiesel sticking to surface

• Cross-contamination in jet fuel

• Stability and freezing point of jet fuel

• Engine problems or potential flame outs

MeO

O

MeO

O

MeO

O

Biodiesel or FAME (Fatty Acid Methyl Esters)

Jet Fuel Contamination by Biodiesel

utrf.tennessee.edu

5

GC/MS

HPLC

FT-IR

• Extensive technical training

• Large and expensive

• Off-site; lack of immediate

results

• Costly: $50k-100k

• Large and heavy: 20 kg weight

• Not sensitive: Biodiesel >20 ppm

Current Solutions

utrf.tennessee.edu

6

Simple and Disposable Slide Sensors

Our Solution

utrf.tennessee.edu

7

Wavelength (nm)

400 450 500 550 600 650

Abs

orba

nce

(AU

)

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

30 ppm201050

Biodiesel Concentration (ppm)

0 10 20 30

Abs

orba

nce

(AU

)0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

Slope = 8.45 x 10-4

R2 = 0.994

Portability

Slides (1 cm2)

Spectra

Biodiesel readings

Yes NoOutput

Contamination

utrf.tennessee.edu

8

Sensitive: 0.5-30 ppm (Low) Range

FAME or Biodiesel Concentration (ppm)0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Ab

sorb

an

ce (

AU

)

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18BiodieselFAME StandardsFAME Regression Line

Biodiesel Concentration (ppm)0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Abs

orb

ance

(A

U)

0.06

0.09

0.12

0.15

0.18

R2 = 0.997

Insert: Linear fit of the biodiesel response

R2 = 0.9998

Our sensor

Chem. Comm. 2013, 49, 9015

utrf.tennessee.edu

9

% FAME Concentration (v/v)0510152025Ab

sorb

an

ce (

AU

)

0.200.240.280.320.360.40a = 1.983 x 10-2

x0 = -1.416 x 10-2R2 = 0.994

ln (x - x0)-4-2024Ab

sorb

an

ce (

AU

)0.240.280.320.360.40

R2 = 0.995100 ppm-20% (Mid-High) Range

A vs. ln (x – x0) (x = FAME concentration; x0 = parameter through data fitting) Chem. Comm. 2013, 49, 9015

utrf.tennessee.edu

10

$50K budget

Equipment Cost Testing Cost

Current IR System $50,000 No tests/buy starter kit – 10 tests

Portable Device $1,600 200 slides/tests - $0.5 per glass slide

Difference $48,400 200 tests

96,800 more tests

Per Slide

Lab

Glass $0.05

Scale-up estimate

Glass $0.03

Plastic $0.01

Cost Structure

utrf.tennessee.edu

11

$0.6 Millions $2 Millions

$1600/unit

$0.5/slide

Total Commercial Market

$4.1 Millions $15 Millions

utrf.tennessee.edu

12

Aviatio

n6%

Ma-rine 14%

Unit Market

$1600/Unit

Aviation 99%

Marine 0.04%

Slide Market

$0.15 Millions$0.5/slide

Total U.S. Military Market

$2.7 Millions

utrf.tennessee.edu

13

• Marine diesels

• Home-heating oil blended with biodiesels

• Truck diesel blends

• Gasolines

• Long-term fuel storage QC

Other Potential Markets

utrf.tennessee.edu

14

International cargo air transportation

Expand to carrier’s passenger travel

Other markets

Market Entry and Growth

utrf.tennessee.edu

15

• Cheap and fast detection of biodiesel

• Huge market with multiple possible

entry points

• Costumer diversity and multiple paths

for growth

• Strong interest from military

Summary

PI: Ziling (Ben) XueTel: 865-974-3443Email: xue@utk.edu

LA: Nghia ChiemTel: 865-974-1669

Email: nchiem@utk.edu

Contacts