Using Data to Assess and Improve Operational Performance in the Emergency Department Jody Crane, MD,...

Post on 13-Jan-2016

214 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of Using Data to Assess and Improve Operational Performance in the Emergency Department Jody Crane, MD,...

Using Data to Assess and Improve Operational Performance in the

Emergency Department

Jody Crane, MD, MBAjcranemd@gmail.com

Chuck Noon, PhDcnoon@utk.edu

Objectives - Web and Action

• Summarize demand/capacity issues within the ED with respect to nursing and physicians hours and bed demand

• Determine the best capacity plan by hour of day based on characteristics of patient demand and determine the ideal schedule of staff

• Create an operational plan to drive future management decisions

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Objectives for Today

• To begin to understand basic concepts behind ED operations

• To provide an overview of analysis with EDucate©

• To orient participants to the data necessary to populate EDucate Inputs ©

• To provide guidance for collecting and validating data for EDucate Inputs ©

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

What is EDucate©?

• The Emergency Department Utilization and Capacity Assessment Tool in Excel©

• A tool to give Emergency Departments an accurate assessment of their current operational state to help guide improvement and operational redesign

• It is the most comprehensive, data-driven assessment tool currently available to help EDs focus on targets for operational improvement

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

EDucate© Summary

• EDucate© can be an effective tool for ─Fast Track and Triage planning ─Matching demand to capacity throughout your

process flow─Determining the correct team size─Determining the impact of holds, diversions,

and walkouts on staffing, throughput, and revenue

─Creating “what-if” scenarios for future projects

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Concepts Behind EDucate©

• EDucate© was developed based on ─A recognition that ED demand is random yet

varies predictably throughout a day─A view that ED operations can be modeled as

a network of queues, with each queue having its own arrival and service characteristics

─The belief that understanding current demand/capacity misalignment is the first step in operational improvement

Server

A Simple Queue

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Server

Person (MD, nurse, tech, transporter, housekeeper,

etc.) or Resource (bed, scanner, equipment, etc.)

A Simple Queue

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

ServerCustomerArrivals

A Simple Queue

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

ServerCustomerArrivals

Person (patient, call, etc.) or Thing (lab sample, soiled room, tray to be picked,

etc.)

A Simple Queue

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Server

A Simple Queue

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Server

CustomerDepartures

A Simple Queue

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Server

Queue(waiting line)Customer

Arrivals

CustomerDepartures

A Simple Queue

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Server

Queue(waiting line)Customer

Arrivals

CustomerDepartures

A Simple Queue

ServiceRate (

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Server

Queue(waiting line)Customer

Arrivals

CustomerDepartures

A Simple Queue

Arrival

Rate (

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

A Simple Queue

Server

Queue(waiting line)Customer

Arrivals

CustomerDepartures

Arrival

Rate ( ServiceRate (

Avg Number

in Queue (Lq )

Avg. Wait Time

in Queue (Wq )

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Triage Example 1Suppose we have a triage operation staffed by a single nurse. Patients arrive and wait in the waiting area if the triage nurse is busy triaging other patients. When a patient is seen by the triage nurse, the triage activity occurs in a single encounter.

Data was gathered and, on average, 6 patients arrive per hour. The average time it takes to triage a patient is 12 minutes.

So, will there be any waiting?

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Triage Example 1Suppose we have a triage operation staffed by a single nurse. Patients arrive and wait in the waiting area if the triage nurse is busy triaging other patients. When a patient is seen by the triage nurse, the triage activity occurs in a single encounter.

Data was gathered and, on average, 6 patients arrive per hour. The average time it takes to triage a patient is 12 minutes (equivalent to rate of 5 per hour).

So, will there be any waiting? Most definitely.

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Triage Example 2Suppose we have a triage operation staffed by a single nurse. Patients arrive and wait in the waiting area if the triage nurse is busy triaging other patients. When a patient is seen by the triage nurse, the triage activity occurs in a single encounter.

Data was gathered and, on average, 4 patients arrive per hour. The average time it takes to triage a patient is 12 minutes (again, a “service rate” of 5 patients/hour).

So, will there be any waiting?

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Triage Example 2 (cont’d)It depends. Let’s look at two situations.

Situation 1 – A patient arrives exactly every 15 minutes and the time to triage each patient is exactly 12 minutes.

Will there be any waiting? If so, how much?

ARRIVAL TIMES

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480

Time

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Triage Example 2 (cont’d)It depends. Let’s look at two situations.

Situation 1 – A patient arrives exactly every 15 minutes and the time to triage each patient is exactly 12 minutes.

Will there be any waiting? If so, how much?There will be NO waiting.

ARRIVAL TIMES

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480

Time

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Triage Example (cont’d)Situation 2 – • Patients arrive according to a random arrival process (a Poisson process) at an average rate of 4 patients per hour.

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

ARRIVAL TIMES

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480

Time

ARRIVAL TIMES

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480

Time

ARRIVAL TIMES

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 390 420 450 480

Time

Poisson Arrival Examples

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

From a sample of arrival data

ARRIVAL TIMES

660 690 720 750 780 810 840 870 900

Time

ARRIVAL TIMES

460 490 520 550 580 610 640 670 700

Time

Arrival data from a California hospital. Mondays, 2pm-6pm.

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Triage Example (cont’d)Situation 2 – • Patients arrive according to a random arrival process (a Poisson process) at an average rate of 4 patients per hour. • Triage (service) times are distributed according to an Exponential distribution with a mean of 12 minutes.

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Service Time (minutes)

Fre

qu

en

cy

Exponential Distribution of Triage Times

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

From a sample of ED Triage Times.

Distribution of Observed Triage Times (n=777)

02040

6080

100120

140160180

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Minutes

Co

un

t

Average = 5.06Std.Dev. = 4.97

Time study data from MWH.

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Triage Example (cont’d)Situation 2 – • Patients arrive according to a random arrival process (a Poisson process) at an average rate of 4 patients per hour. • Triage (service) times are distributed according to an Exponential distribution with a mean of 12 minutes.

Will there be any waiting? If so, how much?

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

How can we estimate the waiting?

• We can use steady-state formulas for certain queuing interfaces. For example, in cases with Poisson arrivals, Exponentially distributed service times, and 1 server, the estimated wait in front of triage can be calculated using the formula:

• Alternatively, we could use any one of a number of computer simulation packages.

• Or, we can use a spreadsheet like QueueCalc which uses the steady-state formulas.

Wq = / (-)

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

With the Coefficient of Variations set to 1, we areAssuming maximal variation with Poisson arrivals and Exponentially distributed service times. Values of 0 would imply no variation.Infinite Queue Approximation Worksheet

INPUTS

KEY OUTPUTS

Triage ExampleIn the triage example, we had an arrival rate of 4/hour and a service rate of 5/hour (average triage time of 12 minutes). Assuming maximal variation, we can use QueueCalc to estimate steady-state values for:

1. Server Utilization __80%__

2. Average Wait Time (Wq) _.8 hour___

3. Average Line Length (Lq) _3.2___

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Triage Example RevisitedIn the triage example, we had an arrival rate of 4/hour and a service rate of 5/hour. If the number of visits to the ED grew by 15%, what would happen to the waiting times?

1. Server Utilization _______

2. Average Wait Time (Wq) ________

3. Average Line Length (Lq) ________

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Triage Example RevisitedIn the triage example, we had an arrival rate of 4/hour and a service rate of 5/hour. If the number of visits to the ED grew by 15%, what would happen to the waiting times?

1. Server Utilization __92%__

2. Average Wait Time (Wq) _2.3 hours___

3. Average Line Length (Lq) _10.6___

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Queuing Interface Principles

For queues with the arrival rate less than the service rate, and full-time server availability,…

─…there will be no waiting if there is no variation

─…variation can be present in the arrival process and/or the service process

─…as variation increases, waiting increases

─…in queues with considerable variation, waiting will increase dramatically as utilization increases and, hence, alignment of capacity with demand is key.

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Typical Queue Behavior

WaitingTime

(minutes)

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

The average rate of arrivals varies fairly predictably throughout a day…

Average Rate of Arrivals (Mondays, 168.5 per day)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Hour of Day

Av

era

ge

Ra

te (

pts

/ho

ur)

Based on one year of arrival data for a California hospital with 58,000 visits.

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

… but the actual count of arrivals for any given hour or day can vary considerably. This is arrival variation.

22 1

21 1

20 1

19 1 1

18 1 1 1 2

17 1

16 2 1 1 1 3 1 1

15 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

14 1 2 8 3 7 3 1 2 1 9 1 1

13 6 3 6 6 1 2 2 1 2 3 3 1 1 1

12 4 3 7 4 6 3 1 3 5 5 6 9 2 3 1 1

Count 11 3 4 6 5 8 4 6 5 5 4 2 4 4 2 1 2

10 1 7 10 5 4 6 7 5 6 3 7 6 9 2 3 3 1

9 1 1 1 2 4 7 5 8 5 3 6 10 14 5 4 4 8 10 12 4

8 3 2 1 6 3 5 6 5 10 11 6 5 8 8 6 11 9 6 5

7 4 1 2 1 1 3 6 3 1 5 4 4 7 6 6 6 4 7 9 6 8 6

6 4 6 4 3 2 3 12 8 4 7 1 5 5 1 5 4 5 1 4 3 9 5 8

5 12 5 6 1 3 1 4 5 5 7 5 2 2 4 3 3 3 5 5 3 1 5

4 10 15 12 10 10 5 4 6 3 2 3 3 3 2 1 3 2 2 5 13

3 8 13 11 16 12 17 10 9 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 6 5

2 9 6 14 15 11 11 20 8 4 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 3 3 5 8 10 10 6 1 1

0 1 7 6 1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Hour of Day (Mondays only)

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

• Medium sized 24-hour Emergency Department with 95 visits per day, on average.

Example Problem - Situation

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Example Problem - Situation

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

12

:00

AM

1:0

0 A

M

2:0

0 A

M

3:0

0 A

M

4:0

0 A

M

5:0

0 A

M

6:0

0 A

M

7:0

0 A

M

8:0

0 A

M

9:0

0 A

M

10

:00

AM

11

:00

AM

12

:00

PM

1:0

0 P

M

2:0

0 P

M

3:0

0 P

M

4:0

0 P

M

5:0

0 P

M

6:0

0 P

M

7:0

0 P

M

8:0

0 P

M

9:0

0 P

M

10

:00

PM

11

:00

PM

Average Arrivals

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

• Medium sized 24-hour Emergency Department with 95 visits per day, on average.

• Physicians can treat 2.5 patients per hour, on average. So, 38 (computed as 95/2.5) physician-hours required per day.

• Therefore, staffing 2 physicians on duty 24-hours per day should provide sufficient capacity cushion (estimated utilization of 79%, computed as 38/48).

Example Problem - Situation

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Example Problem - Situation

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

12

:00

AM

1:0

0 A

M

2:0

0 A

M

3:0

0 A

M

4:0

0 A

M

5:0

0 A

M

6:0

0 A

M

7:0

0 A

M

8:0

0 A

M

9:0

0 A

M

10

:00

AM

11

:00

AM

12

:00

PM

1:0

0 P

M

2:0

0 P

M

3:0

0 P

M

4:0

0 P

M

5:0

0 P

M

6:0

0 P

M

7:0

0 P

M

8:0

0 P

M

9:0

0 P

M

10

:00

PM

11

:00

PM

Average Arrivals

Average Capacity

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

• Makes sense, but how will it really perform?

• Simulate for one year with assumed Poisson arrivals and Exponentially distributed service times.

Example Problem

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Example Problem – Performance

(average waiting time by hour of

arrival)

Average patient wait is 74 minutes

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Longest lines and waits occur at 9-11pm

Average patient wait is 74 minutes

(average waiting time by hour of

arrival)

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Example Problem - Situation

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

12

:00

AM

1:0

0 A

M

2:0

0 A

M

3:0

0 A

M

4:0

0 A

M

5:0

0 A

M

6:0

0 A

M

7:0

0 A

M

8:0

0 A

M

9:0

0 A

M

10

:00

AM

11

:00

AM

12

:00

PM

1:0

0 P

M

2:0

0 P

M

3:0

0 P

M

4:0

0 P

M

5:0

0 P

M

6:0

0 P

M

7:0

0 P

M

8:0

0 P

M

9:0

0 P

M

10

:00

PM

11

:00

PM

Average Arrivals Capacity

But that is not where the problem was caused.

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Example Problem - Resolution

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

12

:00

AM

1:0

0 A

M

2:0

0 A

M

3:0

0 A

M

4:0

0 A

M

5:0

0 A

M

6:0

0 A

M

7:0

0 A

M

8:0

0 A

M

9:0

0 A

M

10

:00

AM

11

:00

AM

12

:00

PM

1:0

0 P

M

2:0

0 P

M

3:0

0 P

M

4:0

0 P

M

5:0

0 P

M

6:0

0 P

M

7:0

0 P

M

8:0

0 P

M

9:0

0 P

M

10

:00

PM

11

:00

PM

Average Arrivals Capacity New Capacity

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Example Problem – Performance

(average waiting time by hour of arrival)

Average patient wait is 43 minutesCopyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Typical Queue Behavior

Giving This

Getting ThisWaitingTime

(minutes)

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

An ED is a network of queues. Balance is crucial.

Network of Queues

• ED operations can be viewed as a network of queues, each of which must be properly configured to align capacity with demand.

• The completion through one server creates an immediate arrival for the next server if handoffs are clear & direct.

S1 S2S4

S3

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

D

Computer Simulation Results

N1

1 Nurse 1 Doctor

N2

4 BedsTreatment Times

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

D

Computer Simulation Results

N1

27

min.

1 Nurse 1 Doctor

N2

9

min.

4 BedsTreatment Times

9

min.

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

D

Computer Simulation Results

N1

27

min.

1 Nurse 1 Doctor

N2

9

min.

4 Beds30 min. Average

time betweenarrivals

Waiting Room

Treatment Times

9

min.

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

D

Computer Simulation Results

N1

27

min.

1 Nurse 1 Doctor

N2

9

min.

4 Beds30 min. Average

time betweenarrivals

Waiting Room

Treatment Times

9

min.

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Simulation

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

D

Computer Simulation Results

N1

27

min.

1 Nurse 1 Doctor

N2

9

min.

4 Beds30 min. Average

time betweenarrivals

Waiting Room

Patient Averages

3.3 hours in Waiting Room

Patient Averages

1.7 hours in Exam Room

Treatment Times

9

min.

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

D

Computer Simulation Results

N1

27

min.

1 Nurse 1 Doctor

N2

9

min.

4 Beds30 min. Average

time betweenarrivals

Waiting Room

Patient Averages

3.3 hours in Waiting Room

Patient Averages

1.7 hours in Exam Room

Treatment Times

9

min.

Total LOS of 5.0 HOURS

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

D

Computer Simulation Results

N1

27

min.

1 Nurse 1 Doctor

N2

9

min.

4 Beds30 min. Average

time betweenarrivals

Waiting Room

Treatment Times 8

9

min.

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

D

Computer Simulation Results

N1

27

min.

1 Nurse 1 Doctor

N2

9

min.

4 Beds30 min. Average

time betweenarrivals

Waiting Room

Patient Averages

3.3 hours in Waiting Room

Patient Averages

1.7 hours in Exam Room

Treatment Times 8

1.4 Hours 2.6 Hours

9

min.

Total LOS of 4.0 HOURS

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

D

Computer Simulation Results

N1

27

min.

1 Nurse 1 Doctor

N2

9

min.

4 Beds30 min. Average

time betweenarrivals

Waiting Room

Patient Averages

3.3 hours in Waiting Room

Patient Averages

1.7 hours in Exam Room

Treatment Times 8

1.4 Hours 2.6 Hours

9

min.

Total LOS of 4.0 HOURS

Caution! This assumes no increase in service times!

D

Computer Simulation Results

N1

27

min.

1 Nurse 1 Doctor

N2

9

min.

4 Beds30 min. Average

time betweenarrivals

Waiting Room

Patient Averages

3.3 hours in Waiting Room

Patient Averages

1.7 hours in Exam Room

Treatment Times 8

1.4 Hours 2.6 Hours

9

min.

Total LOS of 4.0 HOURS

Let’s include a slight increase in service times.

28 1010

D

Computer Simulation Results

N1

27

min.

1 Nurse 1 Doctor

N2

9

min.

4 Beds30 min. Average

time betweenarrivals

Waiting Room

Patient Averages

3.3 hours in Waiting Room

Patient Averages

1.7 hours in Exam Room

Treatment Times 8

3.7 Hours 3.1 Hours

9

min.

Total LOS of 6.8 HOURS!

28 1010

Let’s include a slight increase in service times.

D

Computer Simulation Results

N1

9

min.27

min.

1 Nurse 1 Doctor

N2

9

min.

4 Beds30 min. Average

time betweenarrivals

Waiting Room

Treatment Times

2311 11

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

D

Computer Simulation Results

N1

9

min.27

min.

1 Nurse 1 Doctor

N2

9

min.

4 Beds30 min. Average

time betweenarrivals

Waiting Room

Patient Averages

3.3 hours in Waiting Room

Patient Averages

1.7 hours in Exam Room

Treatment Times

1.4 Hours 1.6 Hours

2311 11

Total LOS of 3.0 HOURS

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

What do You Have to Tell the Tool?

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Inputs

Inputs

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Inputs

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Inputs

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Inputs

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Inputs

1 hour 1 hour1 hour 1 hour

MD Demand

3-hour Length Of Stay

MD spends 30 minutes per patient,

but when?

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

1 hour 1 hour1 hour 1 hour

MD Demand

3-hour Length Of Stay

MD spends 30 minutes per patient,

but when?

Assume all 30 minutes

in first hour?

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

1 hour 1 hour1 hour 1 hour

MD Demand

3-hour Length Of Stay

MD spends 30 minutes per patient,

but when?

Unrealistic!

Assume all 30 minutes

in first hour?

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

1 hour 1 hour1 hour 1 hour

MD Demand

3-hour Length Of Stay

MD spends 30 minutes per patient,

but when?

10 Minutes in first hour

10 Minutes in second

hour

10 Minutes in third

hour

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

1 hour 1 hour1 hour 1 hour

MD Demand

3-hour Length Of Stay

MD spends 30 minutes per patient,

but when?

10 Minutes in first hour

Better, but not exactly the way we do things!

10 Minutes in second

hour

10 Minutes in third

hour

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

1 hour 1 hour1 hour 1 hour

MD Demand

3-hour Length Of Stay

MD spends 30 minutes per patient,

but when?

15 Minutes in first hour

6 Minutes in second

hour

9 Minutes in third

hour

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

1 hour 1 hour1 hour 1 hour

MD Demand

3-hour Length Of Stay

MD spends 30 minutes per patient,

but when?

15 Minutes in first hour

EDUCATE© allows you to

specify how MD (or RN) time is spent within a patient’s LOS.

6 Minutes in second

hour

9 Minutes in third

hour

50% in first 33% 20% in second 33% 30% in third 33%

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Inputs

Sources of Data

• Arrivals data (monthly, daily, hourly) – Most registration systems

• Walkouts (daily, time of day) – Most registration systems

• Lab performance (order to collect, collect to receive, receive to results) – Most hospital ordering systems

• Radiology performance (order to procedure start, proc start to proc end, proc end to results signed) – Most radiology systems

© 2007, Jody Crane, MD, MBA

ED Intervals

• Door to triage

• Triage start to triage end

• Triage end to bed placement

• Bed placement to MD

• MD start to MD dispo

• MD dispo to discharge

Door to Doc

Interval

In-ED Time

© 2007, Jody Crane, MD, MBA

ED Intervals

• Most EDIS can give you this information

© 2007, Jody Crane, MD, MBA

ED Intervals

• What if you don’t have an EDIS?• You have the following options:

─ Patient Tracking Infrared RFID Ultrasound Wideband

─ Retrospective chart review Time consuming ? Accuracy (depends on written documentation)

─ Sampling/Observation

© 2007, Jody Crane, MD, MBA

Sampling

• There are multiple forms and methods of sampling in the ED

• Some require lengthy period of observation

• Some require some math and smarts

• In many cases, a mix can be used to develop the inputs

© 2007, Jody Crane, MD, MBA

Time Observation Sheet

© 2007, Jody Crane, MD, MBA

Patient Based TrackingName:____________________________ MR #:____________________________ Initial Entry to Emergency Department Date:_____________________________ Time:_____________________________ Triage Time you were placed in triage room:____________________ Time nurse entered triage room:_________________________ Time nurse left the triage room:_________________________ Time MD entered triage room:__________________________ Time MD left the triage room:__________________________ Time you left the triage room:___________________________ Main Emergency Department Time you were placed in a room:_________________________ Time the nurse entered the room:_________________________ Time the physician entered the room:______________________ X-rays/CT Time you left the room for x-ray:_________________________ Time you returned from x-ray:___________________________ Lab Time labs were drawn:_________________________________ Discharge Time doctor told you that you would be discharged:__________ Time you left the room:_________________________________

•Patient-completed tool•Accompanied by timer•Some minimal reward

upon completion•Starbuck’s card

•Money ($5)•Most will cooperate,

especially if you let them know it might help their

future visits

© 2007, Jody Crane, MD, MBA

Sampling for Intervals

• Take snapshots with the following information:─ Number of patients waiting to be triaged─ Number in triage─ Number triaged waiting to be seen─ Number in beds─ Number awaiting discharge

© 2007, Jody Crane, MD, MBA

Sampling for Intervals

• Once you have taken multiple snapshots you will have sufficient data for the following:─ Take your overall LOS─ Take the average number of patients in each

area─ Divide this number by the total in the department─ You will then have % distribution─ Multiply this by the overall LOS to arrive at the

length of each interval

© 2007, Jody Crane, MD, MBA

Sampling for Intervals - Example

• Your sampling results in the following averages:

• Overall LOS – 180 minutes─ # to be triaged 5─ # in triage 1─ # to be seen 10─ # in beds 20─ # awaiting discharge 5

© 2007, Jody Crane, MD, MBA

Sampling for Intervals - Example

• Your sampling results in the following averages:

• Overall LOS – 180 minutes─ # to be triaged 5 12%─ # in triage 1 4%─ # to be seen 10 24%─ # in beds 20 49%─ # awaiting discharge 5 12%

Total 41

© 2007, Jody Crane, MD, MBA

Sampling for Intervals - Example

• Your sampling results in the following averages:• Overall LOS – 180 minutes

─ # to be triaged 5 22min─ # in triage 1 4min─ # to be seen 10 44min─ # in beds 20 88min─ # awaiting discharge 5 22min

Total 41 180min

© 2007, Jody Crane, MD, MBA

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

What can EDucate Tell You?

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Information on Daily ED Arrivals and Admissions

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Arrivals by Various Modalities (Triage, EMS, FT)

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

ED Size/Annual Visits per Bed

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

1 hour 1 hour1 hour 1 hour

Bed Demand

3-hour Length Of Stay

1 hour 1 hour1 hour 1 hour

Bed Demand

3-hour Length Of Stay

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

1 hour 1 hour1 hour 1 hour

Bed Demand

3-hour Length Of Stay

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

1 hour 1 hour1 hour 1 hour

Bed Demand

3-hour Length Of Stay

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

1 hour 1 hour1 hour 1 hour

Bed Demand

3-hour Length Of Stay

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

1 hour 1 hour1 hour 1 hour

Bed Demand

3-hour Length Of Stay

Bed Demand Profile

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Bed Demand/Capacity

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Bed Demand/Capacity (Boarders)

RN and MD to Bed Ratios

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

RN and MD Staffing vs. Patient Demand

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Graphical representation of Main ED and FT MD and RN demand relative to capacity by

hour of day

RN and MD Staffing vs. Patient Demand (Boarders)

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

RN and MD Staffing vs. Patient Demand (Boarders+Lunches)

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

RN to MD Ratios

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Admissions / Hospitalist Demand/Capacity Matching

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Inpatient Capacity and Admit Process Assessment

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

The Effect of Boarding on RN FTEs

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

The $$$ Related to LWOBS and Diversions

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

The Right Combo of Bed,RN,MD

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Summary Page

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

EDucate© Summary

• EDucate© can be an effective tool for ─Fast Track and Triage planning ─Matching demand to capacity throughout your

process flow─Determining the correct team size─Determining the impact of holds, diversions,

and walkouts on staffing, throughput, and revenue

─Creating “what-if” scenarios for future projects

Copyright Jody Crane, MD, MBA, Chuck Noon, PhD 2008

EDucate© Summary• There are 4 main components that have to be

aligned in order to achieve a highly functional ED that flows: Triage, MDs, RNs, and Beds (related to ancillary TAT)

• This tool will help identify where and when demand/capacity may be mismatched

• Garbage in/garbage out─Try to get exact data─If you don’t have exact data, that’s ok, but make your

best estimates and understand the subsequent limitations