Post on 16-May-2018
Understanding Japanese NGOsfrom Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
2 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 3Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices (distribution copy), compiled by the
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) in cooperation with the Japan NGO Center for
International Cooperation (JANIC), aims to equip JICA overseas personnel working on the frontline
of JICA – NGO collaboration with an overview of Japanese NGOs and their relationship with JICA.
It also aims to serve as an introduction for overseas practitioners and researchers in international
cooperation who are interested in Japanese cooperation, especially that of Japanese NGOs and
their collaboration with JICA.
The data and analysis provided in Chapters 1 to 5 are drawn from JANIC’s past publications,
mainly from Directory of Japanese NGOs Concerned with International Cooperation and Data
Book of Japanese NGOs 2006 (both available only in Japanese). The analysis in those publications
are based on the data collected from 277 NGOs in the questionnair survey conducted from
September 2005 to January 2006.
The full text and abstract can be downloaded in PDF format from the JICA website at
http://www.jica.go.jp/english/resources/brochures/index.html
Reproduction of the content is allowed under permission from JICA.
Table of Contents
Chapter 1 Overview of Japanese International Cooperation NGOs 4
1-1. History and Background
1-2. Overview of Japanese international cooperation NGOs
Chapter 2 Program characteristics 8
2-1. Fields of activity
2-2. Types of activity
Chapter 3 Countries/Regions of activities 14
3-1. Countries/Regions
Chapter 4 Citizens’ Participation 18
4-1. Individual membership
4-2. Organizational membership
Chapter 5 Finances 20
5-1. Overall income/expenditure size
5-2. Breakdown of income
5-3. Financial sources
5-4. Breakdown of expenditure
Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices
2 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 3Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Chapter 6 Examples of cooperation with Japanese NGOs and donor agencies 28
Chapter 7 Collaboration between JICA and Japanese NGOs 36
7-1. NGO-JICA regular meetings
7-2. Support for and collaboration with Japanese NGOs
7-3. Example of collaboration between NGOs
and JICA in Japanese society
Chapter 8 Examples of collaboration between NGOs and JICA in developing countries (The JICA Partnership Program) 39
Copyright Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
Training Affairs and Citizen Participation Department
Produced by Japan NGO Center for International Cooperation (JANIC)
Year of Publication March 2008
Designed by designFF co,.Ltd
Translated by M.Fujioka
photo: K.Yahata
Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices
4 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 5Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
NGO, an acronym for Non-Governmental Organization, is a term originally used by the
United Nations to refer to private organizations other than governments. At present, it is
customary to use the term NGO to collectively refer to non-governmental, non-profit,
citizen-led organizations working voluntarily (voluntarism) to resolve global issues such
as development, human rights, the environment and peace1. In this edition, we define an
“international cooperation NGO” as a non-governmental, non-profit civic organization.
“International cooperation” is defined as a set of activities to address global issues (including
development, human rights, peace, the environment and emergency relief work), whether
within or outside the country.
1-1. History and BackgroundWhen did Japanese international cooperation NGOs (referred to below as “NGOs”) begin
working? It is said that the beginning of Japanese NGOs can be traced back to a medical
mission composed of Christian doctors and medical students sent to China in 1938. The
mission was sent in response to damage caused by the Japanese military invasion and to provide
care for refugees. For the following 20 years or so, this work was disrupted because of the
intensifying war and, in the post-war period, the need to reconstruct Japan itself. International
cooperation by citizens resumed at the end of the 1950s.
The 1960s saw the birth of organizations that are still active today: the Japan Overseas Christian
Medical Cooperative Service (JOCS, established in 1960), born out of the group that sent the
above medical mission to China; the Asian Rural Institute (ARI), an offspring of the Southeast
Asia Christian Rural Leaders Training Course established in 1960 within the Tsurukawa
Rural Institute (ARI became independent of Tsurukawa Rural Institute in 1973); and the
Organization for Industrial, Spiritual and Cultural Advancement (OISCA, established in 1969
as the OISCA Industrial and Development Body), established by the International Organization
for Cultivating Human Spirit (established in 1961). During the same decade, many citizens’ groups were formed to address and resolve issues in labor, pollution, atomic/hydrogen bombs
and security fields as they became serious social issues.
During the 1970s, Shapla Neer (the Citizens’ Committee in Japan for Overseas Support ), a
pioneer development NGO, was created (named the Help Bangladesh Committee at the time).
The Pacific Asia Resource Center (PARC), born in 1973, analyzed developments in citizens’ movements as well as in political and economic fields in Japan and distributed such analysis
and information overseas through the creation of its English newsletter, named AMPO. Such
activities can be seen as pioneering advocacy-type work. A Japanese branch of the international
NGO Amnesty International was also set up in 1970.
The number of NGOs rapidly increased from 1979 through the late 1980s. In response to
the outflow of a large number of Cambodian and Indochinese refugees in this period, many
citizens hurried to these areas for relief activities and later set up NGOs. Examples include the
Association for Aid and Relief, Japan (AAR JAPAN) (1971), the Shanti Volunteer Association
(named the Japan Sotoshu Relief Committee at the time of its creation in 1979), and the
Japan International Volunteer Center (named the Japan Volunteer Center at the time of its
creation). Their initial activity focus was on emergency relief and the provision of goods,
but later shifted from emergency relief to reconstruction and expanded to include support
for self-reliance/self-help activities, facilitation of repatriation and assistance to internally
Overview of Japanese International Cooperation NGOs
1. Similar to “NGO” is the term “NPO” (Non-Profit Organization), both of which share basic characteristics. In Japan, the term “NGO” tends to be used to refer to civic organizations working in the field of international cooperation, while “NPO” describes organizations working at community level inside the country. However, this edition does not take such a view.
Chapter 1
4 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 5Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
displaced people. Further, as the area of activity expanded from support for reconstruction to
development, their understanding of the structure of poverty in the South and affluence in the
North (known as the North-South problem) deepened, and development education rapidly
expanded.
During this period, a variety of organizations were established other than these NGOs that
began their work in response to the refugee crisis. In the 1980s, public interest in international
issues grew through media reports as many events attracting worldwide attention occurred
(such as the famine in Africa), and global environmental problems began to be debated in
international conferences and reported by the media. Many NGOs were established, including
those specializing in collecting donations and providing financial support to NGOs working in
social development and environmental conservation fields, and those working to resolve human
rights and environmental issues. It was also during this decade that Japanese branches or partner
organizations of international NGOs began to increase in number.
In the late 1980s, the need to share information and experience among NGOs grew as
the number of such organizations increased. The Japanese NGO Center for International
Cooperation (currently the Japan NGO Center for International Cooperation), the Kansai
NGO Council and the Nagoya and the Third World Exchange Center (currently the Nagoya
NGO Center) were established to develop wide networks bridging different fields. These
network-type NGOs began to play a large role in information- and experience-sharing
among organizations, organizational development, distribution of information to the public,
promotion of advocacy work, facilitation of dialogue with the government, promotion of
national-level NGO networking and others. Also since the late 1980s, network-type NGOs by
country/region2 and by area of activity3 have emerged.
The number of newly established organizations was the greatest during the 1990s. This
occurred against a backdrop of a series of world-shaking events that generated greater interest
among citizens in world affairs and a sense of participation in international cooperation.
The 1991 Gulf War triggered a debate on international contribution, while the eruption of
Mt. Pinatubo in the Philippines (1991) and the genocide in Rwanda (1994) contributed to
the rapid growth of public attention on overseas cooperation work. Further, the use of the
term NGO spread through media reports on a series of international conferences4 held in the
1990s, starting with the 1992 Earth Summit (a.k.a. the UN Conference on Environment and
Development). The active contribution of NGOs to relief work in the aftermath of the 1995
Hanshin-Awaji Great Earthquake also contributed to greater recognition from the public for the
work of NGOs. As many as 130 groups and 20,000 volunteers from inside and outside Japan
rushed to the affected areas, helping to raise awareness of the roles of volunteers and NGOs.
Further, public opinion increasingly began to favor giving civic organizations juridical person
status, which led to the enforcement of the Law to Promote Specified Non-profit Activities
at the end of 1998. Now many organizations enjoy greater social recognition as specified
non-profit corporations.
The decade was also a difficult period for NGOs because income from membership fees and
donations that had been rising steadily stagnated as a result of the stalled economy. In the
latter half of the 1990s, many NGOs experienced deteriorating financial conditions, and
various governmental funds to support NGO work began to be made available. In addition
to the NGO Project Subsidy (1989) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) and the NGO
2. In 1988, the Free East Timor! National Coalition (currently the East Timor Japan Coalition) was established. After 1990, the People's Forum on Cambodia, Japan (1993), the Japan NGO Network on Indonesia (JANNI, 1993), the Nippon NGO Network for Nepal (1993) and the Africa Japan Forum (1994) were formed.
3. Examples include the International Human Rights NGO Network (1990), the Japanese Society for Rehabilitation of Persons with Disabilities (1993) and the Solidarity Network with Migrants Japan (1997).
4. Among others, the 1993 World Conference on Human Rights (Vienna), the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (Cairo), the 1995 World Summit on Social Development (Copenhagen), the 1995 Fourth World Conference on Women (Beijing) and the 1996 Second UN Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat II, Istanbul).
Overview of Japanese International Cooperation NGOs
6 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 7Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Agricultural and Forestry Cooperation Program of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and
Fisheries (1989), Postal Savings for Global Voluntary Aid was launched by the Ministry of
Post and Telecommunications (currently Japan Post) in 1991, the International Cooperation
in Construction Program by the Ministry of Construction (currently the Ministry of Land,
Infrastructure and Transport) in 1992, and the Japan Fund for Global Environment by the
Environmental Agency in 1993 (now managed under the auspices of the Environmental
Restoration and Conservation Agency). Accordingly, many new NGOs were created, and
existing organizations began to set up international cooperation sections. During the latter
half of the 1990s, the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) started to strengthen
cooperation with NGOs. JICA launched the Community Empowerment Program in 1997, the
Development Partnership Program (DPP, KAIHATSU PARTNER JIGYOU) in 1999 and the
Small-scale Development Partnership Program (SHOKIBO KAIHATSU PARTNER JIGYO)
in 2000. This program was later merged into the JICA Partnership Program and still continues
today.
While the government and NGOs are enhancing cooperation in the area of finance as described
above,5 NGOs have begun to revisit their relationships with the government. Such action has
included the critical engagement of NGOs towards ODA (Official Development Assistance)
and the strengthening of advocacy and presentation of alternatives to the government and the
business sector.6 In 1996, NGO-MOFA regular meeting began, followed by the NGO-JICA
regular meeting and the NGO-JICA Reciprocal Training Program in 1998. Efforts to improve
such cooperation between NGOs and governmental bodies continue today.
Japanese NGOs also began to take part in NGO networks that expanded worldwide thanks
to economic globalization and the development of information/communications technology.
Through such activities, NGOs are able to strengthen the areas of publicity and information
provision as well as advocacy work towards the government and private corporations.
Since 2000, the number of new organizations has been decreasing. This is because,
unlike in the preceding years when new organizations were established to cope with global
phenomena, existing organizations have been widening the scope of their work by embarking
on new ventures such as relief work.7 Since the Miyazaki Initiative (announced at the 2000
Kyushu/Okinawa Summit) on the role of conflict resolution in the development field and
Action from Japan on the implementation of the Initiative through close coordination and
collaboration between the government, international agencies and NGOs, cooperation between
the government and NGOs has further developed in the form of emergency financial assistance,
the exchange and training of staff and the establishment of the Japan Platform in 2000. The
Hottokenai Sekai no Mazushisa (Don’t Let it Be – World Poverty) campaign launched in 2005
in close coordination with the global campaign called G-CAP (Global Call to Action Against
Poverty) has been carried out through the joint efforts of NGOs, supporting corporations and
individual supporters. These examples show the increasing scope of the work carried out by
NGOs.
5. Mr. Mitsuhiro Saotome (former Director-General, Non-Governmental Organizations Support Division, Bureau of Economic Cooperation, MOFA) describes the decade from 1989 through 1998 as a “period of supporting NGO's projects” and the period after 1999 as a “period of supporting NGO's organizational development.” (Yoshinori Ikezumi, “Chapter 1 NGOs’ Past and Present [NGO no ayumi to genzai],” in Manabi, Mirai, NGO [Learning, the Future and NGOs,] page 72.)
6. Examples include: NGOs' “Alternative Declaration” adopted at the 1995 World Summit on Social Development (Copenhagen); the “NGO Statement” adopted at the APEC NGO International Conference for the APEC Ministerial Meeting held in Osaka in the same year; the Japan Campaign to Ban Landmines towards the signing of the 1997 Anti-Personnel Mine Total Ban Treaty; NGO involvement in drafting the new environmental guidelines for the Japan Bank of International Cooperation (JBIC), created by the merger of the Japan Export Import Bank and the Overseas Economic Cooperation Fund in 1999; and activities related to the WTO Ministerial Meeting in Seattle in 1999.
7. The events occurring in 2000 and after included: earthquakes in western India and El Salvador in January 2001; the terrorist attacks in the US in September 2001; the US invasion in Afghanistan in October 2001; an earthquake in northern Afghanistan in March 2002; an earthquake in Algeria in May 2002; a great earthquake in Iran in December 2002; the Iraq War in March 2003; the bombing in Jakarta in August 2003; the bombing in Bali in October 2003; the bombing of a train in Spain in March 2004; the bombing in Jakarta in September 2004; an earthquake in the coastal area off Sumatra Island and the subsequent tsunami disaster in the Indian Ocean in December 2004. 2005 saw a great earthquake that hit Iran in February, bombings in London in July, the bombing in Bali and a great earthquake in Pakistan in October. In February 2006, landslides caused damage in Leyte Island, the Philippines.
6 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 7Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Overview of Japanese International Cooperation NGOs
1-2 Overview of Japanese International Cooperation NGOs
1-2-1 Field of activitiesThe fields of activity for international cooperation NGOs in Japan vary widely, but can be
roughly classified into the four areas of development, the environment, human rights and peace.
In the field of development, Japanese NGOs are engaged in regional development, agricultural
training, health care services, improving living conditions, spreading education, vocational
training, small-scale industries and so forth in rural areas or urban slums. In the field of the
environment, they tackle reforestation, forest conservation, prevention of desertification and
conservation of the ecosystem. In the field of human rights, NGOs are active in the protection
of the rights of refugees, women, children, people with disabilities, disaster victims, indigenous
peoples, minorities, people in detention and foreign workers in Japan, among others.
In the field of peace, major activities include disarmament, eradication of landmines and peace
education.
Among these fields, education/children, health care, vocational training, gender/women and reforestation
are especially actively pursued, while areas such as democracy/good governance and peacebuilding
are also gaining greater attention. Regardless of the field of activity, a major distinguishing feature
of NGOs is that they pursue activities to meet the basic needs of people in socially or economically
vulnerable positions in different places of the world and encourage their self-reliance.
1-2-2 Types of activityTypes of cooperation directed abroad include financial aid, provision of materials, sending
personnel and receiving trainees in Japan. In implementing these activities, some NGOs
send Japanese representatives abroad while others provide support through local partner
organizations. Meanwhile, activities directed inside Japan such as information provision and
global civic education (development education) are also spreading. These activities aim to
educate Japanese people on issues involving values and lifestyle and review the way Japanese
society should be. Advocacy initiatives targeted toward governments and international
institutions are also becoming more and more active, and “grassroots trade” -- or alternative
trade -- to import goods produced by small-scale farmers or producers in developing countries
and sell them in Japan is steadily expanding.
1-2-3 Area of activities overseasAsia is the principal region where Japan’s international cooperation NGOs work (200
organizations, or 70% of the total). It is followed by Africa (54 organizations), Latin America
(23 organizations), the former Soviet Union/Eastern Europe (14 organizations) and Oceania
(5). In Asia, many organizations work in the Philippines, Cambodia, Nepal, India and
Thailand. In Africa, Kenya, Zambia, Uganda and Ethiopia are the major countries, but the
target regions are widely distributed rather than concentrated on certain countries. In Latin
America, Japanese NGOs work in 16 countries including Peru, Brazil and Haiti; in the former
Soviet Union/Eastern Europe, 10 countries including Ukraine and Belarus; and in Oceania, 7
countries including Papua New Guinea.
Human rights in general
Other peace activities
Peacebuilding
Preventive diplomacy
Disarmament
Democracy / good governance
Other issues related to the global environment
Environmental education
Global warming
Alternative energy
Biodiversity
Soil / air
Reforestation / forest conservation
Other relief activities
Medical services
Human-made disasters
Natural disasters
Food / famine
Debt/international finance / trade
Micro-credit
Support to foreigners in Japan
Water provision / water resources
Population / family planning
Healthcare
Vocational training
Education
Appropriate technology
Small-scale enterprises / street vendors
Small-scale / regional industry
Fishery
Agriculture
Urban development / housing
Agricultural development
Figure 2-1a Percentage of field of activities Overseas activities Domestic activities
0% 20 40 6010 30 50
8 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 9Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
2-1. Fields of activityIn what fields do Japanese NGOs work? Let us take a look at the trends of overseas
and domestic activities by classifying the fields into 33 categories.
Program characteristicsChapter 2
Refugees / internally displaced people
Foreign residents in Japan
Women
Children
People with disabilities
Minorities
Disaster victims
People in detention
Others
0% 10 20 30 40 50
Figure 2-1b Percentage of target groups by field of activities Overseas activities Domestic activities
8 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 9Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
The overwhelming majority of overseas activity is conducted in the field of education
(Figure 2-1a). This is followed by health care, vocational training, rural development and
reforestation/forest conservation. In this survey, we classified the target groups separately from
the fields of activity (Figure 2-1b). The top target group is children, followed by women.
What about activities in Japan? As with overseas activities, the majority is in the field of
education, followed by support for foreign residents and environmental education. Education in
domestic activities tends to consist of global civic education. The major type of activity in this
field is the transmission of knowledge regarding situations and information acquired through
overseas activities to Japanese elementary and middle school students. This is also supported
by the fact that children are the top target group in domestic activities, overtaking foreign
residents.
2-2. Types of activity In what way do Japanese NGOs cooperate with the countries of the South? In this survey, we
classified the types of activity broadly into the three categories of overseas activities, domestic
activities and “not limited to either one.” The results were analyzed by 16 categories in total: 5
overseas; 7 domestic; and 4 “not limited to either one.”
Overseas activities
- Financial assistance (including scholarship programs): Providing funds that people in the
South (referred to as developing countries) need.
- Provision of materials: Supplying materials that people in the South need.
- Sending personnel: Dispatching experts with technical expertise, managers for local offices,
project coordinators, volunteers, etc. from Japan to other countries.
Program characteristics
Figure 2-2a Type of overseas activities (multiple answers)
Financial assistance
Provision of materials
Sending personnel
Information provision
Emergency relief
Research and investigation
Others
0% 20 40 6010 30 50
56%
34%
46%
25%
32%
27%
11%
10 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 11Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
- Emergency relief: Providing emergency financial assistance, material support, personnel,
information and others to offer relief to people facing life-threatening situations as a result
of natural disasters (floods, droughts, earthquakes, etc.) and human-made disasters (wars,
conflicts, nuclear power-plant accidents, etc.) from imminent threat.
- Research and investigation: Conducting overseas research and investigation into to the
problems and issues faced by local people as well as international cooperation.
Domestic activities
- Financial assistance (including scholarship programs): Providing funds that foreign residents
etc. from the countries of the South need.
- Provision of materials: Supplying materials that foreign residents etc. need.
- Sending personnel: Dispatching (placing) personnel for language support, support for living
in general, legal counseling etc.
- Reception of trainees: Receiving people from the South as trainees and providing training to
support the development of human resources.
- Information provision: Supplying political, economic, social, cultural, environmental, legal,
technical and other types of information to Japanese society.
- Global civic education (development education, environmental education, human rights
education, peace education): Educational activities (such as development education) that
are aimed at deepening learning by informing Japanese society of situations in the South
to enhance understanding of the issues of poverty, oppression, conflicts and environmental
degradation as well as the structural causes of North-South gaps remaining wide, and to
encourage action to redress these. Also includes other educational activities facilitating
learning about environmental, human rights and peace issues to nurture global citizens who
can think and act from a global perspective.
- Research and investigation: Conducting research and investigation within Japan into
the problems and issues faced by local people as well as matters concerning international
cooperation.
Financial assistance
Provision of materials
Sending personnel
Reception of trainees
Information provision
Global civic education
Research and investigation
Others
0% 20 40 6010 30 50
Figure 2-2b Type of domestic activities (multiple answers)
4%
3%
8%
17%
22%
10%
40%
61%
10 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 11Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Activities not limited to either overseas or domestic
- Fair trade: Cooperation aiming at the realization of trade in which the goods of producers in
the South will not be traded at unfairly low prices and producers will receive fair payment
through grassroots trade.
- Advocacy: Cooperation by making constructive proposals beyond the criticism of the
government and corporations to eliminate injustices and build a sustainable global society.
- Networking among NGOs: Cooperation by way of facilitating the exchange of information
and the sharing of resources, and enhancing cooperation by creating networks.
- Funding: Cooperation by financial assistance to projects etc. of Japanese organizations
engaged in international cooperation.
In overseas activities, the top two are financial assistance and sending personnel, which are also
ranked at the top in the major programs of each organization.
Program characteristics
1 billion yen and over
500 million - 1 billion yen
100 - 500 million yen
50 - 100 million yen
30 - 50 million yen
10 - 30 million yen
5 - 10 million yen
Less than 5 million yen
0% 20 40 60 80 100
Figure 2-2-1 Type of activities and budget size (overseas activities)
Research and investigation
Emergency relief
Information provision
Sending personnel
Provision ofmaterials
Financialassistance
12 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 13Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
2-2-1. Budget size and types of activityNext, let us look at the relationship between the types of activity and the budget size.
For organizations of all budget sizes, the two major types of activity represented by financial
assistance and sending personnel comprise a high percentage of the budget. However, the ratio
of financial assistance is higher in organizations with budgets of less than 50 million yen, while
sending personnel is higher in those with budgets of 50 million yen or more. It is presumed
that it is difficult to send personnel with a limited budget, and cooperation is thus limited to
providing financial assistance. Emergency relief represents a high percentage in organizations
with budgets of 100 million yen or more, which shows that it is difficult for organizations
working with smaller budgets to engage in such activities, which require large amounts of funds.
In general, the larger the budget size, the more diversified the types of activity become.
Human rights
Peace / politics
Global environment
Relief
Finance
Livelihood
Human resources
Industry
Community
0% 20 40 60 80 100
Figure 2-2-2 Field of activities and type of activities (overseas activities)
Research and investigation
Emergency relief
Information provision
Sending personnel
Provision ofmaterials
Financialassistance
12 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 13Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
2-2-2. Fields of activity and types of workFinally, let us take a look at the relationship between the fields and types of activity. Due to the
wide-ranging nature of the areas of activity involved, we classified the 33 fields mentioned above
into nine groups8 for the purposes of analysis.
In the field of human resources (including the education and vocational training that rank high
as overseas activities), financial assistance and provision of materials, the two major types of
overseas activity, represent a high percentage. This shows that many organizations are engaged
in providing financial assistance to build schools, sending personnel as teachers or assistants in
local schools and stationery. It can also be pointed out that many groups are engaged in foster
parenting activities to send financial aid to assist schooling. The field of livelihood, which
includes another popular field, health and medical care, shows a trend similar to that of human
resources. It is considered that the activities in this field focus on the provision of medicine
and medical equipment, sending doctors and nursing staff and assistance in building medical
facilities. In the global environment category, the major types of activity represented by financial
assistance and sending personnel comprise a high percentage, but research and investigation
enjoys the highest proportion among all nine groups, while information provision also
represents a large share. It is presumed that in addition to sending volunteers for reforestation
work and providing information on environmental protection and conservation to local people,
organizations themselves carry out research and investigation into the causes of environmental
destruction and ways to prevent it.
In domestic activities, the proportion of global civic education and information provision is
generally high.
Among the activities not limited to overseas or domestic activities, fair trade, advocacy and
networking have an equal share each, but the funding program is very low.
8. Community: agricultural development, urban developmentIndustry: agriculture, fishery, small-scale regional industry, small-scale enterprises/street vendors, appropriate technologyHuman resources: education, vocational trainingLivelihood: healthcare, population/family planning, water provision/water resources, support to foreigners in JapanFinance: micro-credit, debt/international finance/tradeRelief: food/famine, natural disaster, human-made disaster, medial services and other relief activitiesGlobal environment: reforestation/forest conservation, soil/air, biodiversity, alternative energy, global warming, environmental education and other issues related to the global environmentPeace/Politics: democracy/good governance, disarmament, preventive diplomacy, peacebuilding and other peace educationHuman rights: human rights in general
Program characteristics
Figure 3-1a Region of activities (multiple answers)
Asia 72%
Latin America
Africa 19%
Former Soviet Union/Eastern Europe
Oceania 2%
5% 8%
14 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 15Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Chapter 3 Countries/Regions of activities
3-1 Countries/Regions Which countries and regions are the targets of Japanese NGOs’ work? This survey showed that
the overwhelming majority of NGOs (70 percent, or 200 organizations) work in and for Asia.
In Asia, southeast Asia represents more than half, followed by South Asia (3-1b). In Africa, East
Africa has the largest share followed by West Africa, and as Figure 3-1c shows, the distribution
is more balanced, unlike in Asia where one sub-region comprises more than half.
Let us take a closer look at each region. Figures 3-1b and 3-1c show the number of
organizations working in and for the country in each region. The figure represents the number
of organizations.
In Asia, 28 countries were identified, among which the Philippines is outstanding, followed
by Cambodia, both in Southeast Asia, and Nepal from South Asia. In East Asia, China (with
growing economic gaps between urban and rural areas), and Mongolia (which suffered a severe
cold wave in 2000) are the focuses of activities. In Southeast Asia where more than half of
NGOs are involved, many organizations work in the Philippines, Cambodia, Thailand and
Indonesia. As for South Asia, the gap in the number of organizations by country is not as big
as that of those working in Southeast Asia. In addition to conventional aid, new organizations
have started working in this region to respond to aid needs related to the earthquake off
Sumatra and the tsunami disaster. The number of organizations working for Afghanistan has
also significantly increased. As for West Asia, many organizations work to help resolve
problems related to the Palestinian issue, for which no resolution is in sight, and issues related
to the Iran-Iraq War. In Central Asia, which has the lowest number of working organizations,
assistance is offered in the health-care field among others.
In Latin America, 16 countries were
identified, with Brazil and Peru at the top,
followed by Haiti and Ecuador. The major
fields of work are agricultural development,
agricultural training, reforestation and forest
conservation, and support for producers
through fair trade (small-scale/local industry
assistance, appropriate technology assistance,
etc.).
In Oceania, seven countries were identified.
Except for Papua New Guinea, only one
organization works in one country. The
major fields of activity are agricultural
development, agricultural training, and
reforestation and forest conservation. Some
NGOs provide assistance in vocational
training, small-scale/local industry and
health and medical care.
Ten countries were identified in the former
Tajikistan
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Jordan
Iran
Turkey
Iraq
Lebanon
Palestine
Afghanistan
Pakistan
Sri Lanka
Bangladesh
India
Nepal
East Timor
Malaysia
Myanmar
Laos
Indonesia
Viet Nam
Cambodia
Thailand
Philippines
Mongolia
DPRK
ROK
China
Figure 3-1b No. of organizations by country of activities (Asia)
0 20 40
1
1
1
1
8
4
4
4
3
3
3
23
18
33
27
40
43
10
7
20
19
34
28
50
39
56
6
19
14 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 15Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, but the overwhelming majority work in Belarus. In Eastern
Europe, the former Yugoslavia (where ethnic rivalries and conflicts exacerbated the situation
after the death of President Tito) is the focus of activities, which are focused on responding to
refugee issues arising from the conflicts.
Africa is faced with a number of problems including a low growth rate, accumulated debts,
food shortages from droughts, conflicts and refugee crises, and a growing number of people
living with HIV among others.9 Further, tribal power relationships cast long shadows over the
political and economic conditions in many countries where multiple tribes exist and traditional
tribal society is still deeply rooted. As we have seen, African countries face a number of serious
problems for which NGOs are offering aid in various forms. The number of target countries
is 32, with Kenya in East Africa receiving the most attention, followed by Zambia in Southern
Africa, and Ethiopia and Uganda in Eastern Africa. The major fields of activity are assistance
in response to disasters such as droughts and floods caused by heavy rain, aid to refugees and
assistance to those living with HIV. In Zambia, which receives the greatest number of refugees
in Southern Africa,10 assistance is given in the fields of health and medicine.
9 . According to the survey of the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, 40 ,300 ,000 people worldwide were infected with HIV as of December 2005. Sixty percent of these cases (25,800,000 people) were found in Sub-Saharan Africa.
10. According to UNHCR, the number of refugees received is 281,766 people.
Zimbabwe
Mozambique
South Africa
Swaziland
Malawi
Zambia
Mauritius
Eritrea
Madagascar
Ethiopia
Sudan
Tanzania
Kenya
Central African Republic
Chad
Angola
Congo
Rwanda
Uganda
Benin
Côte d'Ivoire
Nigeria
Liberia
Guinea
Mali
Burkina Faso
Sierra Leone
Senegal
Ghana
Algeria
Tunisia
Mauritania
Figure 3-1c No. of organizations by country of activities (Africa)
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
50 10
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
8
8
4
4
7
12
16 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 17Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
3-1-1. Fields and areas of activityFigure 3-1-1 shows the kinds of activity conducted by the area of activity.1111. The denominator, or the number
of organizations of each region, is 200 for Asia, 23 for Latin America, 5 for Oceania, 14 for the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, 54 for Africa and 50 for Japan. The replies include multiple answers.
Figure 3-1-1 Field of activities and region of activities
Japan
Africa
Former Soviet Union/Eastern Europe
Oceania
Latin America
Asia
Human rights in generalCommunityLivelihood Relief Peace/politics
Human resources Global environmentIndustry
Finance
20 40 60 80 1000%
200% 40 60 80 100
Asia Latin America Oceania
Former Soviet Union/Eastern Europe
Africa
Figure 3-1-2 Budget size and region of activities
More than 1 billion
500 million –1 billion
100 million – 500 million
50 million – 100 million
10 million – 50 million
5 million – 10 million
Less than 5 million
Japan
16 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 17Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Countries/Regions of activities
3-1-2. Budget size and areas of activitiesOverall, it is obvious that Asia comprises the majority. In other regions, small-scale organizations
with a budget of less than 5 million yen (income and expenditure) are found most commonly
in those groups working primarily in Japan and the former Soviet Union/Eastern Europe. In
Africa, organizations of this size comprise the smallest percentage, while those with a budget of
50 to 100 million yen form the largest group. The percentage of organizations with a budget
of 500 million yen or more is the greatest among those working in/for Asia, as well as Latin
America and Africa. Among organizations working in Asia and Latin America, each budget’s
size cluster has more or less the same percentage.
Figure 4-1 Distribution of individual membership
300 ~ 500
500 ~ 1000
1000 ~ 2000
2000 ~ 3000 2%
3000 ~ 5000 2%
5000 ~ 10,000 1%
10,000 and over 1%
Unknown 4%
100 ~ 300
0 (no membership system)
1 ~ 100 persons
10%
29%
24%
9%
12%
6%
18 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 19Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Chapter 4 Citizens’ Participation
4-1. Individual membershipHow many individual members do Japanese NGOs have?12 This survey revealed that 249 of
277 organizations have an individual membership system, with the overall number of individual
members being 179,959. Some organizations call those who support their activities donors
or supporters rather than members. 84 organizations have such a system, with a total number
of 341,134 individuals, exceeding the number of individual members. The distribution of
the number of individual members shows that organizations with 100 members or fewer and
between 100 and 300 members comprise about half.
The top 10 NGOs in terms of the number of individual members are listed below:
1. WWF Japan 35,000
2. Network Earth Village (NEV) 13,000
3. Peshawar-kai 12,500
4. Japan Overseas Christian Medical Cooperative Service (JOCS) 5,807
5. Amnesty International Japan 5,481
12. Individual members are divided into full members, associate members, student members and other categories. Here the term “individual members” includes all these types.
18 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 19Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
6. Asian Health Institute (AHI) 4,464
7. Organization for Industrial, Spiritual and Cultural Advancement (OISCA) 4,279
8. Asian Rural Institute (ARI) 3,500
9. Child Fund Japan 3,440
10.Peace Winds Japan (PWJ) 3,216
As for individuals other than members who support organizations (donors, supporters etc.),
NGOs with 100 persons or fewer comprise 30 percent. Individuals who support the following
10 organizations comprise 80 percent of all such individuals:
1. Japanese Organization for International Cooperation in Family Planning (JOICFP)
159,000
2. Plan Japan 75,100
3. World Vision Japan 37,784
4. Minsai Center Japan 8,000
5. International Children Without Borders 3,000
6. Child Fund Japan 2,614
7. Organization for Industrial, Spiritual and Cultural Advancement (OISCA) 2,203
8. Association to Help Chernobyl-Chubu District, Japan (Chernobyl-Chubu Association) 1,200
9. Japan Committee, Vaccines for the World’s Children 1,000
10.Association of Support for People in West Africa (SUPA) 800
Organizations with a large number of individual members and supporters share the
characteristics of having juridical person status and a Western NGO as their parent body.
Among those with many individual supporters, we can identify another characteristic: a foster
parent program. These organizations appear to attract a greater number of members and
supporters owing to the high social credibility generated by having juridical person status,
the name recognition created by a parent Western NGO, effective publicity and greater
approachability, as well as the transparent destination of donations that a foster parent program
provides.
4-2. Organizational membershipNow let us turn to organizational members.13 144 NGOs have organizational members
numbering 10,229 in total, which are broken down into 7,053 for-profit organizations and
3,176 non-profits. As is the case with individual members, 27 NGOs have a system of support
organizations rather than member organizations, which number 3,542 (2,053 for-profits and
1,489 non-profits) in total. For both member organizations and support organizations, there are
more for-profits than non-profits.
13. As is the case with individual membership, organizational members are also divided into different types such as full members and associate members. Here “organizational members” includes all these types.
Citizens’ Participation
Figure 5-1 Budget size
Less than 1 million yen 8%
1 million – less than 3 million 11%
20 million – less than 30 million 6%
30 million – less than 50 million 8%
50 million – less than 100 million 10%
100 million – less than 200 million 6%
200 million – less than 500 million 5%
500 million and over 4%
3 million – less than 5 million 13%
5 million – less than 10 million 14%10 million – less than 20 million 15%
20 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 21Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Chapter 5 Finances
5-1. Overall income/expenditure size
The overall income/expenditure size for fiscal 2004 was 28,613,200,000 yen.14 The distribution
varies widely, with those with 5 million yen or less comprising about 30 percent, those with 10
million yen or more a little over 50 percent, and those with 100 million yen or more a little less
than 20 percent (Figure 5-1). The median is 12,170,000 yen.
Organizations with a budget of 100 million yen or more comprise a little less than 20 percent,
or 42 organizations. The top 10 organizations and their budget size are as follows:
1. Plan Japan 4,905,860,000 yen
2. World Vision Japan 2,951,440,000 yen
3. Medecins Sans Frontieres Japon (MSF Japon) 1,804,900,000 yen
4. Peace Winds Japan 1,649,030,000 yen
5. Organization for Industrial, Spiritual and Cultural Advancement (OISCA) 1,273,180,000 yen
6. WWF Japan 1,259,120,000 yen
7. Japanese Organization for International Cooperation in Family Planning (JOICFP)
840,100,000 yen
8. National Federation of UNESCO Associations in JAPAN 586,690,000 yen
9. Shanti Volunteer Association 547,340,000 yen
10. Peshawar-kai 514,140,000 yen
The combined budget size of the top 10 organizations is 16,331,820,000 yen, or more than half
(57 percent) of the total budget combined.
14. Figures are rounded up to the nearest thousand. The same format is applied from here on.
Figure 5-2 Breakdown of incomeFigure 5-2 Breakdown of incomeMembership dues 7.8%
Donations 41.8%
Balance carried fromprevious year 16.8%
Other income 6.0%
Funds from funding agencies 11.2%
Profits from the fund management 0.4%Income from independent programs 6.2%
Income from commissioned programs 9.8%
Figure 5-2-1a Distribution of income from donations
0 yen5%
1 – less than 1 million 31%
1 million –less than 2 million 13%
2 million – less than 3 million 6%
3 million – less than 5 million 8%
5 million – less than 10 million 9%
10 million – less than 20 million 10%
50 million and over10%
30 million – less than 50 million 4%
20 million – less than 30 million 3%
20 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 21Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
5-2. Breakdown of incomeNow let us take a look at a breakdown of income. In general, independent revenues including
donations, membership dues, profits from fund management and profits from independent
programs account for more than half, with donations having the largest share.
5-2-1. DonationsFirst, we take up the largest funding source, donations. The sum of donations for each
organization varies considerably from 0 to 3.5 billion yen at the largest. The median is
2,350,000yen.1515. Calculated by excluding the 13 organizations that receive no donations
Finances
Figure 5-2-1b Percentage of donations in income
0
50% 10 15 20 25 30 35
100%
90% range
80% range
70% range
60% range
50% range
40% range
30% range
20% range
10% range
Less than 10%
0.4%
1.5%
1.5%
6.1%
8.0%
13.4%
10.7%
16.8%
34.7%
3.4%
3.4%
22 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 23Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
The top 10 NGOs receiving the greatest amount of donations are as follows:
1. Plan Japan 3,507,120,000 yen
2. World Vision Japan 1,818,370,000 yen
3. Medecins Sans Frontieres Japon (MSF Japon) 1,676,270,000 yen
4. WWF Japan 429,200,000 yen
5. Japanese Organization for International Cooperation in Family Planning (JOICFP)
303,980,000 yen
6. Japan Overseas Christian Medical Cooperative Service (JOCS) 301,290,000 yen
7. Association for Aid and Relief, Japan (AAR JAPAN) 292,870,000 yen
8. Shanti Volunteer Association 252,380,000 yen
9. Organization for Industrial, Spiritual and Cultural Advancement (OISCA) 228,740,000 yen
10.Minsai Center Japan 192,160,000 yen
Figure 5-2-2 Distribution of income from membership dues
0 yen 15%
1 – less than 1 million 42%1 million – less than 2 million15%
2 million – less than 3 million 8%
3 million – less than 5 million 4%
5 million – less than 10 million 7%
10 million – less than 20 million 3%
20 million – less than 30 million 1%
30 million – less than 50 million 2%
50 million and over 3%
22 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 23Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Finances
5-2-2. Membership duesWhile the total amounts collected from membership dues vary widely (as is the case with
donations) from 0 to 2.9 billion yen, more than half the organizations surveyed receive less than
2 million yen, and those receiving less than 1 million yen comprise over 40 percent (Figure
5-2-2). The median is 1,020,000 yen.16
The top 10 NGOs receiving the greatest amount of membership dues are as follows:
1. Peace Winds Japan (PWJ) 288,790,000
2. Child Fund Japan 234,840,000
3. Organization for Industrial, Spiritual and Cultural Advancement (OISCA) 233,030,000
4. Peshawar-kai 228,520,000
5. WWF Japan 192,060,000
6. Foundation for International Development/Relief (FIDR) 130,210,000
7. Network Earth Village (NEV) 78,870,000
8. Amnesty International Japan 68,460,000
9. Educational Sponsorship of Needy Asian & African Children (ESNAC) 48,840,000
10.National Federation of UNESCO Associations in JAPAN 47,710,000
16. Calculated by excluding the 41 organizations that receive no membership dues.
Figure 5-2-3 Distribution of income from programs
0 yen
1 – less than 1 million
1 million – less than 2 million
2 million – less than 3 million
3 million – less than 5 million
5 million – less than 10 million
10 million – 20 million
20 million – 30 million
30 million – 50 million
50 million and over
Independentprogram
s
Com
missioned
programs
36%
72%7%
6%
4%
1%
1%
2%2%
6%
4%3%
4%3% 3% 3% 3%
3%
7%
31%
24 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 25Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
5-2-3. Income from programsThere are two categories of NGO income from programs: income from independent programs
and income from commissioned programs.
Of all the organizations, a little over 60 percent have income from independent programs. The
largest group, with one million yen or less of such income, comprises 30 percent, and those
with less than 5 million yen represent about half.
Let us turn to income from commissioned programs. Only 76 organizations receive such
income, or less than 30 percent of the total, showing that not many NGOs utilize the
commissioned programs provided by the government, the UN and related bodies and private
institutions. Among these 76, a little less than 30 percent receive 1 million yen or less, and
a little less than 40 percent receive 5 million yen or less. On the other hand, a little over 10
percent of the organizations have an income of 50 million yen or more from commissioned
programs. A breakdown of such income reveals that the amount from UN bodies is slightly
greater than that from the other two, but the three sources share roughly the same amount. The
largest amount for each source is 140,820,000 yen from government-commissioned programs,
434,910,000 yen from UN bodies and 346,590,000 yen from private institutions.
Local government 1%
Private funds 70%
Japan post 2%
Ministry of Foreign Affairs 10%
Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency 2%
Others 15%
Figure 5-4 Breakdown of receiving funds from funding agencies
24 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 25Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
5-2-4. Funds from funding agenciesFunds from funding agencies refers to monies provided to NGOs for the implementation of
their programs by foundations, charitable trusts, religious corporations, labor unions and other
private institutions, as well as local governments, government-related bodies and ministries.
Figure 5-2-4 shows the breakdown of funds by funding agency. The reason for the higher
percentage of organizations receiving funds from private institutions seems to be largely
connected to the characteristics of private funds themselves. Such funds are relatively easier
to use compared with governmental funds and subsidies, which are characterized by complex
accounting procedures and restrictions related to the financial year.
Finances
5-2-4-1. Private fundsThere are 123 organizations receiving private funds, representing the greater share of just over
40 percent. About half these organizations receive less than 2 million yen, and the median is
2,220,000 yen.17
Private funds as a proportion of total income represent less than 10 percent for nearly half the
organizations, and the share is less than 20 percent for close to 90 percent of organizations. The
highest share is in the 70 percent range, and no organizations have 80 percent or more.
5-2-4-2. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) NGO Project Subsidy
The NGO Project Subsidy was created in 1989 as the first NGO support fund for the
purpose of assisting a wide range of NGO activities in Japan. In this survey, it was found
that organizations receiving this subsidy comprised about 10 percent (30 organizations). The
amount of funding received varies considerably, ranging from hundreds of thousands to 40
17. Calculated by excluding the 152 organizations that had no income from private funds.
26 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 27Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
5-2-4-3. Local governmental subsidiesLocal government is another entity providing assistance to NGOs. According to the Fiscal 2004
Directory of Recognized International Exchange Associations published by the Liaison Council
of Recognized International Exchange Associations, 46 of 59 regional Exchange Associations
have some kind of assistance program. Most of these provide assistance to organizations
based or conducting activities in the Association’s area of responsibility (prefecture or city) in
principle, but some associations do not have such restrictions.
The proportion of organizations receiving subsidies from local governments is 17 percent (48
organizations). Although local governmental subsidies comprise only 1 percent in terms of the
amount (Figure 5-2-4), the number of NGOs receiving such subsidies is greater than those
receiving funding from the MOFA NGO Project Subsidy. This is considered a result of the low
amount of funds dispensed.
5-2-4-4. Other financial assistance programsOther financial assistance programs mentioned in the survey responses include MOFA’s
Grant Assistance for Japanese NGO Projects,18 the JICA Partnership Program19 of the Japan
International Cooperation Agency (JICA)etc. NGOs receiving aid from these programs
comprise a little over 10 percent of all the organizations surveyed, with the amount of funds
varying widely from a few hundred thousand to 150 million yen.
5-3. Financial sourcesLastly, let us analyze the financial sources of NGOs by the source types of independent revenue,
private funding and public funding. Independent revenue sources are membership dues,
donations and income from independent programs; private funding refers to funds from private
funding agencies and fees received from private institutions for commissioned programs; and
public funding sources include Japan Post, the Japan Fund for Global Environment, MOFA,
local governments and other financial assistance programs as well as fees received from the
government and the UN for commissioned programs.
Figure 5-3 indicates that Japanese NGOs are not overly dependent on external sources of
finance. The number of organizations with a financial self-sufficiency ratio of less than 50
percent is the same as those with a ratio of more than 50 percent, while only a little over 10
percent of organizations have a self-sufficiency ratio of less than 20 percent. Additionally,
about 80 percent of organizations have less than a 20 percent dependency on private or public
funding sources. Organizations with more than a 50 percent dependency are very few in
number, with 3.4 percent for private funding sources and 7 percent for public funding sources.
However, this result is attributed to the fact that the share of private and public funding sources
is less than 20 percent for the vast majority of organizations, while that of independent revenue
sources varies widely from 0 percent to 100 percent, with no concentration at either the high
or the low end of the spectrum. This is also evident from the fact that while about 40 percent
of the organizations receive funds from private funding agencies, only about 10 percent are
18. This refers to financial cooperation in socio-economic development projects and humanitarian projects implemented by Japanese NGOs in developing countries. It was created in 2002 by integrating the existing schemes in the ODA to provide assistance to NGOs (the portion of the Grass-roots Grant Assistance provided to Japanese NGOs and the Grant Assistance for NGO Emergency Relief Activities that had been provided to Japanese NGOs). Eligible organizations are Japanese NGOs with juridical person status (specified non-profit corporations and public interest corporations). With the policy of decreasing the NGO Project Subsidy, MOFA’s assistance to NGOs is shifting to Grant Assistance for Japanese NGO Projects. In fiscal 2004, a total of 2,776,000,000 yen (1,038,000,000 yen when assistance to Japan Platform is excluded) was dispensed to a total of 105 cases. (“ODA (Official Development Assistance) and NGOs: Implementation Record of Grant Assistance to Japanese NGO Projects.” Non-Governmental Organizations Cooperation Division, International Cooperation Bureau, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, October 2006).
19. Although a form of commission is taken in the contract, this is actually a cooperation project planned by a body such as a Japanese NGO, university, municipal government or public interest corporation, and supported by JICA and jointly implemented. JICA examines proposals for activities planned independently by the applying organization. If the proposal is deemed suitable for assistance from the ODA, the project is implemented according to the plan approved. There are three types: local government type, support type, and partner type.
million yen, with half the organizations receiving less than 5 million yen and a median of 4.5
million yen. In terms of total income, the share is less than 10 percent for more than half the
organizations, and is 20 percent or less for close to 90 percent of the organizations.
Figure 5-3 Percentage of funding sources
Public funding sources
Private funding sources
Independent funding sources
0 – less than 20% 20 – less than 50% 50 – less than 80% 80 – 100%
79% 14% 5%
84% 13% 3%
36% 33% 18%13%
2%
0.4%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Figure 5-4 Breakdown of expenditure
Programs 69%
Administration 12%
Other expenses 2%
Balance carried forward to following year 17%
Overseas Programs 70%
Domestic Programs 25%
Programs not classified as Overseas/Domestic 5%
26 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 27Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Finances
5-4. Breakdown of expenditureNext, we will take a look at a breakdown of expenditure. Program expenses comprise about 70
percent, and administrative expenses a little more than 10 percent. Among program expenses,
overseas programs comprise by far the highest ratio of 70 percent.
beneficiaries of other financial assistance programs (the MOFA NGO Project Subsidy, Japan
Post’s Postal Savings for Global Voluntary Aid, the Japan Fund for Global Environment etc.),
as we have already seen. This contributes to the higher ratio of independent revenue sources.
28 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 29Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Villagers are drawing a community map based on the villagers' HIV risk behavior at AIDS Awareness Workshop
Examples* of cooperation with Japanese NGOs and donor agencies
Country: Thailand
Name of Organization: Services for the Health in Asian
and African Regions (SHARE)
Website: http://share.or.jp
Partner agency: United Nations Development Programme
(UNDP)
Summary of the cooperation project
[Background and purpose]
Many people living in the northeast of Thailand, one of the
poorest areas in the country, migrate to urban areas or overseas
to seek jobs. They tend to access the sex industry or use drugs
due to the harsh labor conditions and solitude they have to
endure, and as a result become infected with HIV.
This project aimed to help these migrant workers overcome
their vulnerability to HIV/AIDS and acquire the capability to
cope with issues related to HIV/AIDS.
The venture was implemented for about two years with the
financial help of the United Nations Commission on Human
Strengthening HIV Resilience in Thai Mobile Populations’ Source Communities
Security.
The United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security was
launched in 1999 under the initiative of Japan. Its objective
is to advance the operational impact of the concept of human
security by financing the activities of UN agencies to address
various threats facing the international community.
[Activities]
The project had three components:
(1) Enhancing education, raising knowledge and awareness of
HIV/AIDS
(2) Support for income generation project (IGP)
(3) Care support network
(1) Participatory training for the dissemination of knowledge
to prevent AIDS and HIV infection, campaigns to coincide
with events in the village, creation of AIDS volunteer groups
to disseminate knowledge on AIDS. In schools, sex/AIDS
education, creation of AIDS clubs, activity meetings involving
teachers.
(2) Straw work, mushroom growing, artificial flowers, paper
bag production, etc.
These activities were based on the Trust Fund for Human
Security’s notion that a wide variety of interdependent
activities should be carried out. There was also a lot of need
* These examples are compiled from the point of view of Japanese NGOs conducting projects in collaboration with donor agencies.
Chapter 6
28 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 29Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Examples of cooperation with Japanese NGOs and donor agencies
Health staff is training volunteers on first aid at Basic Health Care Training
Examples* of cooperation with Japanese NGOs and donor agencies
for these types of activities, which were carried out under
the cooperation of the Social Development Department of
Thailand and related NGOs.
(3) Training on primary healthcare, home visits, first aid,
counseling, etc. Participants who finished the training course
and acquired skills were further trained to form care support
groups.
Home visits were made to people living with HIV (PLHIV)
and their families, and a network of local medical institutions
and PLHIV groups was built. Groups were also formed to
help resolve issues faced by migrant workers, and a handbook
containing information on the prevention of HIV infection
and the rights of workers was produced.
[Outcome of the project]
(1) Enhancing education, raising knowledge and awareness of
HIV/AIDS
- Children and villagers who received AIDS education
became more supportive to PLHIV.
- Participants became volunteers themselves to disseminate
knowledge about AIDS in villages or at schools, thus
creating a ripple effect.
(2) Support for income generation project (IGP)
- Attempts to reduce expenditure were made through cause
analyses.
- Focus was placed on the development of personnel
capacity and enhancement, as well as the improvement of
product quality.
- Strategies were developed based on market research in
villages.
- Transparent accounting.
- A fund to support PLHIV and other vulnerable groups
was established and run, and was funded by activity-related
income.
(3) Care support network
- The care support teams who received a range of training
visited PLHIV in villages with medical personnel and
PLHIV group leaders to follow up on the health of people,
provide medication support and offer referral to appropriate
medical services.
- Some villagers revealed that they were living with HIV
and began to take part in the activities.
- PLHIV visited by the above teams received mental
support and medical counseling.
- Local migrant workers who had had accidents at work
formed a migrant workers’ support group. The group
offered advice to workers on how to lodge claims to their
employers, which led to improved protection of their rights
as workers.
[Evaluation and issues]
- The staff members of SHARE were too few for the size of
the target area (the northeast), which is vast and has a large
population.
- Implementation was smooth, thanks to a work process
manual that was produced in consideration of actual progress
made regarding activity points to ensure consistent execution
of activities.
- From the second year, the handover to the local municipality
was studied and a working team was set up to promote the
area-wide sustainability of the project.
-NGOs are expected not only to act as a bridge between
the project site and UN agencies/the government (such
as coordinating views with UNDP at the time of project
planning), but also to facilitate cooperation among the various
municipal bodies responsible for a range of fields in the area
and link these bodies to the villagers.
30 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 31Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Country: Sudan
Name of Organization: Association for Aid and Relief,
Japan (AAR JAPAN)
Website: http:/www.aarjapan.gr.jp
Partner agency: United Nations Mine Action Service
(UNMAS) and United Nations Office of the High
Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), United Nations
Children's Fund (UNICEF), and Japan Platform.
Summary of the cooperation project
[Background and purpose]
The civil war in Sudan, which lasted from 1983 to 2005,
resulted in more than 4 million refugees and internally
displaced people. Even after the civil war ended, the
day-to-day living in 21 of 26 states is seriously affected by
landmines, hampering the movement of people, transport
of goods and construction of buildings. Minerisk education
(MRE) is therefore being implemented in cooperation with
UNMAS to teach people how to protect themselves from the
dangers of landmines and unexploded ordnances. This project
Mine Risk Education: Material Development and Implementation/Public Health Programme
was launched based on the experience of joint implementation
of an MRE project in Afghanistan between AAR JAPAN and
UNMAS.
Additionally, as more than 600,000 refugees who had fled the
war to neighboring Kenya and Uganda began returning to
Sudan, many of them faced fatal diarrhoea, malaria, cholera
and other infectious diseases caused by a lack of basic living
infrastructure in the areas to which they returned. For this
reason, AAR JAPAN is cooperating with UNHCR and
Japan Platform to provide safe drinking water and a water
hygiene/health infrastructure (such as construction of toilets
and distribution of mosquito nets) to facilitate the return of
the refugees.
[Activities]
(1) Mine Risk Education : Material Development and
implementation (UNMAS)
- Production of about 400,000 copies of a leaflet for
refugees and internally displaced people. Distributed at
way stations shelters for repatriates and minerisk education
locations throughout Sudan.
- Production of 2,500 copies of training materials
for trainers in minerisk education conducted by
UNICEF/Ministry of Education, which received high
appraisal.
- Two minerisk education teams carrying out actual
Children holding leaflets and posters on mine risk education (Khartoum. Sudan)
Examples of cooperation with Japanese NGOs and donor agencies
Borehole maintained by residents (Kapoeta South County Southern Sudan)
30 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 31Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Examples of cooperation with Japanese NGOs and donor agencies
educational activities in South Kurdufan Province, where
the largest number of mines and unexploded ordnances are
found.
(2) Public/Health Program (UNHCR)
- 20 wells were dug (2007) and 30 are planned for 2008.
- Setting up of a water management committee by
residents.
- Distribution of a total of 9,000 mosquito nets for
prevention of malaria infection (2007).
- Construction of three Primary Health Care Unit.
- Training for volunteers in hygiene and malaria prevention
education for malaria prevention (20 areas). This program
will be expanded to cover 50 areas.
- Distribution of 3,000 mosquito nets in cooperation with
UNICEF (Small Scale Funding Agreement Fund).
[Evaluation and issues]
- Experience of collaboration with a UN agency may lead to
further collaboration with other UN agencies.
- The collaboration with UNMAS was realized as a result
of the experience of jointly implementing a project in
Afghanistan.
- It is a great advantage for NGOs to be able to diversify their
funding sources by collaborating with the UN.
- The framework of Japan Platform was very helpful in the
collaboration with the UNHCR. With the help in financing
the initial operation, results were achieved, which proved to
be very effective in promoting collaboration with the UN.
- One challenge for NGOs in the future is to build diplomatic
capacity to enable them to build contacts with UN agencies
and operate within the framework of such coordination.
32 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 33Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Contry: Afghanistan
Organization: Shanti Volunteer Association (SVA)
Web: http://www.sva.or.jp
Partner organization: United Nations Children’s Fund
(UNICEF)
Summary of the Project
[Background and objectives]
After the 9/11 attacks in 2001, the US launched an air strike
in Afghanistan. It is said that 5 million refugees fled the air
strike into neighboring Pakistan at the time. The transition
government installed in 2002 promoted the repatriation
of the refugees, and a few million of them returned to the
eastern state of Nangarhar. However, a lack of employment
opportunities still continues in Afghanistan, and people find
themselves in difficult circumstances.
Further, child labor has been on the increase in the past few
years, and the Afghan government is called on to take action
against this. In Eastern Nangarhar Province in particular,
Survey on Working Children in Jalalabad
there have been many reports of children being involved in
illegal work along the Pakistani border. In Jalalabad City,
there is a noticeable increase of children coming to the city
from rural areas for work. There is a concern that children
face physical risks in wretched working conditions, but there
has been very little in the way of surveys on the conditions
of working children. This survey was conducted from
November 2006 to May 2007 in Jalalabad to explore what
kind of measures should be taken in the future.
[Activities]
A questionnaire survey was conducted in the street with
working children (600 children aged 7 to 18) in cooperation
with UNICEF and the Afghan government’s Department of
Welfare and Labor. A household survey was also conducted
in the same area (500 households) in cooperation with
Nangarhar University’s students and teachers (30, in 5
teams). The SVA and the Department of Labor and Welfare
staff members served as the team leaders, and the teams
toured each region by car.
The survey results were compiled into a database that SVA
reviewed with the staff member of the Department. SVA
added a survey on labor by children enrolled in schools in
the City to investigate the effects on the enrollment rate. A
questionnaire survey was also conducted with 20 employers of
children.
This is a preliminary survey that precedes a national-level
Examples of cooperation with Japanese NGOs and donor agencies
A male interviewer is interviewing a boywho is selling almonds in the street of the city.
32 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 33Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Examples of cooperation with Japanese NGOs and donor agencies
investigation. Its results will be analyzed from the standpoints
of access to education, health and welfare services and
the protection of children, and will be submitted to the
Department of Labor and Welfare. The results will also be
made available to support organizations and aid agencies.
[Survey results]
In Jalalabad, 90 percent of working children have family and
relatives as well as a home to return to, unlike the border areas
where children come to work alone. Most of the working
children in Jalalabad are from rural areas. One of the reasons
for child labor is that there is easier access to manual labor
for children than adults. The average wage for children is
low (about 50 to 70 percent of that for adults), and there are
no fixed rules about working hours. Usually children work
an average of six hours a day, including on-duty hours, but
some work up to 12 hours. They typically engage in sorting
vegetables, cleaning at construction sites, tending stores,
vending, trash picking and transporting goods. Children’s
labor is a way of earning cash on a day-to-day basis rather
than a source of income that their families depend on to live.
Some families make their children work to cover their own
expenses (e.g. school uniform, stationery). Children take it
for granted that they should work, and think that they must
do so to help their family. On the other hand, children often
are not paid because they are accused of making mistakes, or
may have their pay reduced without good reason in addition
to being forced to accept unjust working conditions. There
are even reports that children are subjected to physical risk.
Employer awareness is low, and they tend to think that they
are helping to save the poor by employing children, which
indicates the seriousness of the problem.
[Evaluation and issues]
Assessment and issues about collaboration with the UN
UNICEF initially contacted us for the possible commissioning
of this survey, as it was difficult for them to conduct analysis
of child labor independently due to security and other
concerns. Cooperation among the Department of Labor
and Welfare, the UN and an NGO enabled a survey to be
conducted from various points of view.
As for the issues, the fact that the UN was involved in the
survey raised expectations for aid among its participants,
meaning that some responses were based on this expectation
and may not have truly reflected the actual conditions.
A female interviewer is hearing from a girl who takes care of housework. A staff of the Department of Labor and Social Welfare is questioning children who work in streets in Jalalabad city.
34 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 35Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Country: Zambia
Organization (at the time): The Association of Medical
Doctors of Asia (AMDA)
Website: http://www.amda.or.jp
(present): AMDA Multisectoral and Integrated
Development Services (AMDA-MINDS)
Website: http://www.amda-minds.org
Partner agency: United Nations Volunteers (UNV)
Summary of the cooperation project
[Background and purpose]
Like many other African countries, Zambia faces HIV/AIDS-
related problems. 21.5% of the population aged 15 through
49 is infected with HIV, which is the 6th highest in the world
(UNAIDS, 2001). People with HIV/AIDS are more likely
to be infected with tuberculosis (TB). According to a report
of Zambia's health ministry, close to 80% of TB patients also
have HIV/AIDS in the urban setting.
TB is one of the major complications of HIV/AIDS and
poses an urgent and serious challenge. Therefore the
Japanese government is engaged in anti-HIV/AIDS and anti-
tuberculosis projects in Zambia in collaboration with other
Dispatching UNV Volunteer to AMDA’s Anti-Tuberculosis Project
donors such as the US and UN agencies.
AMDA has been implementing projects for improving
nutrition of infants and reinforcing volunteer activities
by the residents in unplanned residential areas (slums) in
Lusaka since 1998. In 2003, AMDA launched a pilot anti-
tuberculosis DOTS (Directly Observed Treatment Short-
course) program at the community level in coordination with
local health facilitie.
The Zambia's health authority had introduced a DOTS
program in 1999 but it has not fully functioned due to
chronic shortage of human and financial resources. Thus,
to support and supplement the government's DOT program,
AMDA launched this anti-tuberculosis project to which UNV
provided one International UNV Volunteer Specialist.
[Activities]
In the areas in Lusaka, Zambia, inhabited by poor people, as
many as 40% of TB patients was reported to have stopped
taking the medicines in the middle of the treatment due to the
reasons mentioned above. The project aimed at identifying
potential capacity of the local residents and training them as
TB treatment supporters to provide supportive activities in a
wide area of the community, such as monitoring drug-taking
through DOTS and providing care to patients and health
education. The ultimate goal of the project was to contribute
to enhancing treatment effectiveness and preventing the
spread of TB.
Mr. Satoshi Otani, a UNV Volunteer to the AMDA project presenting health education materials to a health center staff in Lusaka
Examples of cooperation with Japanese NGOs and donor agencies
34 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 35Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Examples of cooperation with Japanese NGOs and donor agencies
The International UNV Volunteer Specialist assigned
to AMDA launched and managed the anti-tuberculosis
project. The health educational activities and awareness
campaigns of the project contributed to improving the
residents' understanding of HIV/AIDS and TB and led to the
establishment of a community-based DOTS system as part of
the governmental health services. These activities generated
synergy with the ant-HIV/AIDS program and were rated
highly by the receiving agencies.
[Evaluation]
- The project has become a precursory case of partnership for
the prevention of spread of diseases such as HIV/AIDS, which
addresses the MDG6.
- The project aims at the promotion of collaboration between
the governmental agencies and local residents and is evaluated
favorably for its high synergy. Many health volunteers and
community members participated in the field work (health
education and awareness campaigns) to improve their
livelihood.
- Through cooperation between UNV and NGOs, greater
opportunities for publicity work and resource mobilization
were made possible.
Development of the UNV scheme in the future- Comment from United Nations Volunteers-
1) Since it was launched in response to strengthen the human resource capacity of Japanese NGOs in the 1990s, the scheme was mainly to fill the human resources gaps found in receiving organizations. It is deemed necessary that the scheme focuses more on achieving MDGs based on a more equal partnership with UNV and cooperating NGOs.
2) Therefore, deployment of volunteers under this scheme in the future should take into consideration of (1) consistency with UNDAF (UN Development Assistance Framework) and (2) program synergy with other organizations, especially the UN system.
3) Other considerations include whether the activity is consistent with the V4D (Volunteerism for Development) concept that UNV promotes as its business model and is related to the areas of work that UNV Volunteers can make the best use of their skills and experience, namely, (A) increased access to opportunities and services, and better delivery of services; (B) greater inclusion and participation in development; and (C) the mobilization of communities. Suitability with the regional strategies of UNV is also considered.
4) Cooperation between UNV and hosting NGOs should collaborate more in publicity and resource mobilization.
TB treatment supporter, a local volunteer, monitoring drug-taking at the TB section of a health center
A TB treatment supporter organizing a health education program in front of the TB section of a health center
36 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 37Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
JICA has continued its policy of building better partnerships with Japanese NGOs since
the launch of specific collaboration schemes in 1998, not only at the local project level in
developing countries but also through periodic meetings, training aimed at enhancing mutual
understanding and capacity among staff and joint project evaluation.
Additionally, as JICA aims to deliver aid to residents and communities of developing countries
expeditiously and effectively under the concept of human security, it is becoming increasingly
important to ensure effective collaboration to the maximum extent possible by making the most
of the respective advantages of NGOs and JICA.
7-1. NGO-JICA regular meetings A space for building better relationships
JICA and Japanese NGOs hold the NGO-JICA regular meeting every three months to facilitate
information exchange and enhance mutual understanding. The meeting began in 1998, and
continued after JICA became an independent administrative institution in 2002. Its aim is to
make international cooperation more effective through the cooperation of JICA and NGOs and
to promote citizens’ understanding and participation in such efforts.
The meeting’s participants consist of representatives of the Japan NGO Center for
International Cooperation (JANIC), the Nagoya NGO Center and the Kansai NGO Council
on behalf of Japanese NGOs20, and related sections from JICA including the Training and
Citizen Participation Department responsible for citizen participation, the Planning and
Coordination Department and Regional Departments. Observers from MOFA, JBIC and
relevant NGOs can also participate in addition to the three network-type NGOs mentioned
above. Meetings are mainly held in Tokyo, but when held in other cities such as Osaka and
Nagoya, NGOs and the domestic offices of JICA in the region also participate.
The meeting is basically composed of two sections: the Information Sharing part, in which
reports from Sub-Committees and related events and matters are shared, and the Consultation
part, in which discussion takes place on topics of mutual concern.
The following three Sub-Committees are set up within the framework of the regular meeting:
(a) the Program Partnership Sub-Committee, to discuss mainly institutional aspects of
NGO-JICA collaboration projects in general, including the JICA Partnership Program; (b)
the Evaluation Sub-Committee, to share information and knowledge through evaluation of
both JICA and NGO projects and compile lessons and recommendations for more effective
planning, implementation and evaluation of respective projects or collaboration projects, and
(c) the Development Education Sub-Committee, to discuss effective activities to promote
citizens’ understanding and participation in international cooperation while ensuring the
mutual understanding of both parties. Those responsible for each Sub-Committee as well as
other relevant parties gather periodically for in-depth discussion. In this way, official meetings
between JICA and NGOs are held more than 20 times a year. The content of these meetings is
made public on JICA’s website.21
Since it is difficult to resolve institutional issues in a practical way on an individual project level,
both parties engage in thorough and straightforward discussion of any item on the agenda until
Collaboration between JICA and Japanese NGOs
20. These are network-type NGOs bridging various NGOs of different sizes. JANIC has 76 organizational members, the Nagoya NGO Center 44 and the Kansai NGO Council 28.
21. http://www.jica.go.jp/partner/ngo/index.html#meeting (available only in Japanese)
Chapter 7
36 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 37Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
mutual agreement is reached. Both JICA and NGOs consider that continuous and constructive
argument and actions are the most effective means to deepen mutual understanding for the
purpose of raising the effectiveness of Japanese contributions in international cooperation and
collaboration projects implemented in developing countries.
7-2. Support for and collaboration with Japanese NGOsJICA provides support to the international cooperation activities of Japanese NGOs through
cooperation in training personnel engaged in such activities and sending expert advisers. These
programs are outlined in the table below.22
Objective Name of support project
Beneficiaries Content
Collaboration project
NGO-JICA Mutual Training
NGO staff members and JICA staff members
Facilitation of mutual understanding, sharing of knowledge on international cooperation and networking building through retreat workshops.
Training of personnel
Project Management Training
Staff members of NGO interested in JICA Partnership Program
Introduction to planning methods and monitoring/evaluation methods of JICA Partnership Program.
Organizational Development Training
NGO staff members Acquiring basic knowledge and practical skills in development aid and implementation of an action plan by participants.
Organizational enhancement
Technical Support by Experts (overseas)
Japanese NGOs operating overseas
Sending experts with expertise needed at the NGO’s project site to help effective implementation of the project.
Technical Support by Experts (domestic)
Japanese NGOs operating in the field of international cooperation
Sending experts in accounting and various kinds of organizational management to the secretariat or activity sites inside Japan to support organizational enhancements.
An NGO-JICA Japan Desk is being set up as part of the function of JICA offices responsible
for collaboration with and support for Japanese NGOs working in developing countries, as
well as for the promotion of collaboration between Japanese aid workers and local NGOs.
The main functions of the Desk, which provides services that match the circumstances of each
country/area, are as follows:
1. Support for local activities of Japanese NGOs and Japanese nationals (promotion of
collaboration with JICA operations, etc.)
2. Promotion of collaboration between Japanese NGOs and local NGOs
3. Promotion of collaboration between local NGOs and JICA programs
Major activities
1. Support for local activities of Japanese NGOs
- Provision of information necessary for local activities (e.g. various procedures)
22. Programs as of January 2008
Collaboration between JICA and Japanese NGOs
38 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 39Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
- Provision of information including country information, aid plans and activity plans for
the country, as well as support for formation of the JICA Partnership Program
- Provision of information to promote collaboration with local NGOs
- Consulting
2. PR activities for Japanese nationals
- Provision of information on activities of JICA and the country where the Desk is set up.
- Support for international cooperation and exchanges between Japanese civic organizations
and the country where the Desk is set up (information provision, reception of study tours,
support for development education).
- Consulting.
3. Promotion of collaboration with local NGOs
- Referral to Japanese NGOs to promote collaboration among NGOs.
- Provision of information and consulting activities to local NGOs to expand cooperative
partnerships in the future.
7-3. Example of collaboration between NGOs and JICA in Japanese society
In industrialized countries including Japan, interest in international education and development
education is growing as a way to enhance future generations’ capacity to think and act. This
observation holds true to Aichi Prefecture, where Expo 2005 Aichi was held in 2005.
In 2003, a study group was launched by JICA Chubu (the JICA domestic office responsible
for the Chubu region) and local NGOs, Boards of Education and universities based in Aichi
in order to study how international education and development education are perceived and
carried out. For this purpose, a questionnaire survey was conducted with elementary, secondary
and high schools as well as with special support schools in the Prefecture. Half the schools
in the Prefecture responded, and one of the findings was the limited availability of teaching
materials and information regarding international education.
Based on the survey results, JICA Chubu produced a textbook titled From Classroom to
Earth: Tips for Development Education and International Education--Nurturing People,
Classroom, Society in March 2006 as a teaching material for use in schools. This was compiled
in cooperation with the Nagoya Institute of Education for Development (NIED) with its
experience of research in international education, as well as with local NGO personnel, teachers,
former volunteers of JOCV23 and others. The textbook describes model programs for nine
themes including human rights and intercultural understanding, and curricula that can be used
on a continual basis. The textbook is now used as an educational tool both in and outside the
Chubu region.
23. Japan Overseas Cooperation Volunteers. The JOCV program dispatches Japanese nationals as
©IV
Yam
agat
a
©IV
Yam
agat
a
38 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy] 39Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Cambodia: Rural Development by Women for Women
JICA Partnership Program (Partner type) Project title: Sustainable Agricultural Project by Female
Participatory Approach
Organization: International Volunteer Center of
Yamagata
(IV Yamagata)
Duration: October 2003-June 2006 (Completed)
Agricultural skills and knowledge necessary for poor women in rural areas
In Svay Rieng Province, one of the poorest regions in
Cambodia, women in rural villages have only limited
opportunities to acquire agricultural skills and knowledge,
even if they are responsible for growing vegetables and rearing
domestic animals that represent an important source of income
for their village. This project aimed to bring out the initiative
and leadership of rural women by providing them with
opportunities to acquire knowledge and skills in sustainable
agriculture, and to promote participation by local residents in
community activities and improve livelihood.
Active operation of community organizations
As a result of support for reinforcing the functions of
community-based organizations such as women’s groups
and women’s cooperatives, and for developing personnel to
support these organizations, residents now run community
organizations in villages where community cohesiveness was
previously weak and almost no public services were available.
Election of women’s cooperative leaders (candidates stand on the left; adult women
have voting rights).
Workshop in Basic Living Course designed to deepen understanding on nutrition and
family vegetable garden.
Examples of collaboration between Japanese NGOs and JICA in developing countries (The JICA Partnership Program)
Chapter 8
The JICA Partnership Program (referred to below as JPP) is a program supported by JICA that
aims to implement projects in developing countries planned by Japanese development partners
(mainly NGOs, local governments and universities) based on their accumulated experiences
and technologies in development at grass-roots level through partnership with NGOs and
organizations in partner countries.
Japanese NGOs actively participate in JPP, bringing alternative ideas and approaches that
benefit the lives of people at grass-roots level. As JPP is offered to Japanese development
partners through JICA’s nationwide network, many Japanese NGOs based in local cities have
also been able to actively engage in international cooperation activities.
Philippines: For a Healthy Life Not Dependent on Waste
JICA Partnership Program (Support type)
Project title: Support for Healthcare and Income in the
Payatas District
Organization: Intercommunication Center for Asia and
Nippon (ICAN)
Duration: November 2003-March 2005 (Completed)
Improving residents’ health and developing an environment for self-support
At the Payatas waste disposal site on the outskirts of Metro
Manila in the Philippines, a mountain of waste reaching as
high as 30 to 50 meters supports the livelihoods of 2,000 to
3,000 people who collect recyclable resources from it. The
community healthcare center, which was set up for people
with poor living conditions, provides periodic check-ups and
treatment as well as a nutrition improvement program for
mothers with children suffering from malnutrition. Emphasis
was also placed on the training and development of the health
workers who would be running the healthcare center in the
future. A total of 31 health workers received training, 6 of
whom continue to be involved in the management of the
center.
Activities for income/livelihood improvement
A collective workshop was built for vocational training and
the joint production and sale of handicrafts (stuffed animals
etc.) to support people in earning a living not dependent on
waste. A self-help group of residents actively participated
in the training, which covered product development
know-how, quality control, customer service, accounting and
organizational management.
The self-help group now operates independently, and a small
number of residents have become completely self-dependent.
Periodic check-ups are held twice a week by doctors, nurses and health workers.
©C
anD
o
©IC
AN
40 Understanding Japanese NGOs from Facts and Practices [Distribution copy]
Kenya: Cooperation among Residents, Teachers and Local Government to Improve Educational Environment
JICA Partnership Program (Partner type)
Project title: Community-based Basic Education
Improvement Project in Nuu Division of Mwingi District
Organization: Community Action Development
Organization (CanDo)
Duration: January 2004-December 2006 (Completed)
Improving the educational environment through cooperation among local residents, teachers and local government
In this project, the following activities were carried out
to facilitate mutual collaboration among local residents,
teachers and local government: (1) environmental and health
education/activities at elementary schools; (2) activities to
establish education for infants; (3) classroom construction
and structural repairs (and related technical and management
guidance). Special attention was paid to promoting the
voluntary participation of parents in school management,
improving teachers’ motivation to teach and facilitation of
cooperation between residents and local government.
Elementary school supported by residents--signs of change in gender relations
In one elementary school in particular, many parents are
single mothers. Despite being relatively poor by community
standards, these mothers go to work in fields in other
communities as a group to support the school by allocating
part of their earnings to teacher salaries.
Although many of the parents in this area are women, men
have often held the position of chairperson on the elementary
school’s management committee. However, there are signs
of change in gender relations in the community triggered by
this project, as shown by the fact that there is now a female
chairperson who enjoys the full confidence of local residents.
Parents working on the foundation of the classroom building.