Ubicomp 2014 - Conversations with my washing machine: an in-the-wild study of Interactive Energy...

Post on 08-Jul-2015

153 views 0 download

Tags:

description

Best paper nominee, presented at Ubicomp 2014 Authors: Jacky Bourgeois, Janet van der Linden, Gerd Kortuem, Blaine A. Price and Christopher Rimmer Contact: jacky.bourgeois AT open.ac.uk Abstract: Domestic microgeneration is the onsite generation of low- and zero-carbon heat and electricity by private households to meet their own needs. In this paper we explore how an everyday household routine – that of doing laundry – can be augmented by digital technologies to help households with photovoltaic solar energy generation to make better use of self-generated energy. This paper presents an 8-month in-the-wild study that involved 18 UK households in longitudinal energy data collection, prototype deployment and participatory data analysis. Through a series of technology interventions mixing energy feedback, proactive suggestions and direct control the study uncovered opportunities, potential rewards and barriers for families to shift energy consuming household activities and highlights how digital technology can act as mediator between household laundry routines and energy demand-shifting behaviors. Finally, the study provides insights into how a “smart” energy-aware washing machine shapes organization of domestic life and how people “communicate” with their washing machine.

Transcript of Ubicomp 2014 - Conversations with my washing machine: an in-the-wild study of Interactive Energy...

Conversation with my Washing Machine: An in-the-wild Study of Demand Shifting with

Self-generated Energy

Jacky Bourgeois, Janet van der Linden, Gerd Kortuem,

Blaine A. Price and Christopher Rimmer

1

In collaboration with

2

Electricity generation with solar panels alters people’s relationship with energy

“Energy farmers”

Local Energy Generation is Complex

• Self-generated energy is used locally or is exported to grid

• Additional energy is imported from the grid if required

• Import costs are higher than export payments received

• Generation incentive payments vary by country

“optimizing” energy use in the home is complicated

3

Solar Photovoltaic (PV)

Generation

ExportTo the grid

ImportFrom the grid

Self-consumption

Local Energy Generation is Complex

“Energy Gap”: Consumption and local generation are out of sync

• Generation and consumption vary during day

• Generation and consumption vary by weather and season

• Typically generation peaks around midday, consumption peaks in early evening

4

Electricity Profile of household #12 on 7 May 2013 (Consumption vs Generation)

Previous Research

• Most ubicomp and HCI energy research has focused on consumption and demand reduction

• “Double-dividend of solar generation” [Keirstead 2007]: households adopt new energy saving practices

• “Looking out of the window” [Price et al 2013]: householders estimate weather impact to shift demand

5

What role can Ubicomp technology play in enabling or supporting new

energy practices in households with solar generation?

Specifically: demand shifting

6

Case Study: Doing Laundry with Washing Machine

7

Laundry practices and washing machine use is good case study:

• Everyone needs to wash clothes

• Involves whole family

• Temporal constraints (deadlines)

• Environmental impact

• Emerging demand-shifting practices

by Gloria Garcia

“In-the-Wild” Study with Households

Objective

• Understand household practices

• Explore design alternatives for in-home technology

Scope

• 8 Months

• 18 households

• 64 participants

8

Study Methodology

• Home instrumentation

• Participatory energy data analysis

• Design and deployment of technology interventions

• Qualitative studies:

• Home visits

• Interviews & focus groups

• Thematic analysis

9

Study Methodology: Energy Data

• 20M data points over 2 years

• Household electricity generation

• Household electricity import

• Household electricity export

• Washing machine use (timing and electricity consumption)

• Other appliances (timing and electricity consumption)

10

Fixing technology installation presented an opportunity for qualitative data gathering

Four Technology Interventions

12

#1 Delayed Energy Feedback via Email

13

#1 Delayed Energy Feedback via Email

14

• Participants received email with summary energy report few days after they have used the washing machine

• Report outlines:• Predicted solar energy

generation for next 5 days• Past daily generation and

washing machine use

• Idea: enables householders to reflect on behavior and plan future washing machine use

#1 Delayed Energy Feedback via Email: Findings

15

• Users did not engage with energy reports, neither in a positive nor negative way

• Interpretation:

• the gulf between email and real family life is too large

• Planning of washing machine use is not something that is done on the computer

#2 Real-time Feedback via SMS Text Messages

16

#2 Real-time Feedback via SMS Text Messages

• Participants received SMS a few minutes after washing machine use

• 'You ran your washing machine at 15:45 today (3.7% green). You could have achieved 43.6% by starting it at 10:34.‘

• 'Congratulations! You ran your washing machine at 13:48 today (65% green). The expected maximum for today was 71%.'

17

#2 Real-time SMS Feedback: Findings

• “Just saying ‘your washing used 63 percent of solar’, that’s in itself is not really useful to us.”

• “unless you’re going to keep all these text message and analysethem, you are not going to get that information.”

• “It’s like shooting in the dark!”

18

#3 Proactive Suggestions via SMS Text Messages

19

#3 Proactive Suggestions via SMS Text Messages

• Participants received a SMS message at a time they had chosen. This message:

• Suggests best time of day to run washing machine during the next 36 hours

• This involved predicting solar energy generation for each hour of a day and uses past weather and generation data, and local weather forecast

20

#3 Proactive Suggestions: Findings

• Very positive response from participants

• Some participants followed suggestions

• Even if participants did not follow the suggestions they appreciated that the information was there for them

21

#3 Proactive Suggestions: Findings

• Huge diversity across households – where each family wanted to receive their proactive message at a different time

• Many requests for changes to mobile phone numbers for the messages, thus involving more members of the household

22

#4 Embedded Control

23

#4 Embedded Control

• Display and interactive control near the washing machine which was actually controlling the machine and receiving feedback (Zigbee)

• Shows best time to use washing machine

• User can select auto-start at best time

• User can select constraints for start and end time

24

#4 Embedded Control: Findings

• Mostly positive reactions• Actionable information at

right time and right place

• Participants suggested many refinements:• Start time should

continuously adapt to current weather

• The system should pause the washing machine when a cloud passes

25

#4 Embedded Control: Findings

• New laundry practices:

• load machine in the morning, set to auto-start, leave for work

• Appropriation:

• Participants used Information about best start time to manually control other appliance (dish washer)

26

Conclusion

1. Technology support for demand-shifting is viable and effective

• Supporting emerging practices, not behavior change

2. Engagement and utility increased from

• decontextualized information -> embedded contextual control (i.e. email -> washing machine display)

• retroactive feedback -> proactive suggestions

3. Decisions about timing of washing machine use is negotiated through “conversations with my washing machine“

4. Future work: from one appliance to many appliances

27

Conversation with my Washing Machine: An in-the-wild Study of Demand Shifting with

Self-generated Energy

Jacky Bourgeois, Janet van der Linden, Gerd Kortuem,

Blaine A. Price and Christopher Rimmer

In collaboration with