Post on 22-May-2020
TYPICAL MEMBER SPOT CHECKS FOR GRAVITY
LOADS AND ALTERNATE SYSTEMS TYPICAL BAY
DESIGN STUDY
Prince Frederick Hall
The University of Maryland
College Park, MD
Christopher Cioffi
AE Senior Thesis- Structural
Advisor: Heather Sustersic
October 18, 2013
2
Table of Contents
Letter of Transmittal .............................................................................................................. 1
Building Abstract ..................................................................................................................... 2
General Information............................................................................................................... 3
List of Documents Used ........................................................................................................ 4
Typical Member Spot Checks for Gravity Loads .................................................. 19
Alternate System- One Way Slab .................................................................................. 35
Alternate System- Post Tensioned Two Way Slab ............................................... 42
Alternate System- Steel Composite Decking .......................................................... 56
System Comparison ............................................................................................................ 64
Powerpoint Presentation ................................................................................................. 68
1
The Pennsylvania State University
Dept. of Architectural Engineering
Heather Sustersic
Professor of Architectural Engineering
213 Engineering Unit A
University Park, Pa 16802
Heather Sustersic,
The following is the technical three submittal of my structural thesis. It contains spot
checks for gravity loads, and three different alternate gravity systems. It shows spot
analysis of the existing two way slab and gravity checks for a typical interior and exterior
column. Also this tech report shows the design of a one way slab, post tensioned two way
slab and a steel composite deck for a typical bay. I hope that you enjoy reading my findings
and I look forward to hearing back from you.
Thank you,
Sincerely,
Christopher Cioffi
2
BUILDING ABSTRACT
3
GENERAL INFORMATION
Executive Summary
The purpose of this technical report is to establish an understanding of Prince
Frederick Hall’s structural and existing features. Prince Frederick Hall is nestled at the
heart of The University of Maryland’s campus and is a multi-use dormitory building
consisting of living and office spaces. This document provides an overview of all the
structural components designed by Cagley & Associates Inc. including general floor
framing, structural slabs, shear wall, and the foundation system. Integration of all
structural components is explained and elaborated upon. The pictures and images
(unless otherwise noted) are the property of The University of Maryland and WDG
Architecture PLLC and are being used solely for educational purposes.
Site Plan and Location of Building
4
LIST OF DOCUMENTS USED
Documents Used for Analysis and Design
ASCE 7-08
ASCE 7-10
ACI 318-08
ACI 318-11
AISC 14th Edition
PCA Design Aids
Reinforced Concrete Mechanics and Design, Sixth Edition. Wight
5
GRAVITY LOADS
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
TYPICAL MEMBER SPOT CHECKS FOR GRAVITY LOADS
Typical Floor Bay Being Analyzed
N
20
TYPICAL MEMBER SPOT CHECKS FOR GRAVITY LOADS
TWO-WAY SLAB SPOT CHECKS
21
22
23
z
24
25
26
TYPICAL MEMBER SPOT CHECKS FOR GRAVITY LOADS
SHEAR CAP CHECK
27
28
29
TYPICAL MEMBER SPOT CHECK FOR GRAVITY LOADS
INTERIOR COLUMN
30
31
32
33
34
35
Alternative System:
One Way Slab Design
With Reinforced Beams
Photo credit:
Dictionary of Construction
36
ALTERNATIVE GRAVITY SYSTEM DESIGN:
ONE WAY SLAB
37
ALTERNATIVE GRAVITY SYSTEM DESIGN:
ONE WAY SLAB
38
39
40
41
42
Alternative System:
Two- Way Post Tensioned
Slab Design
Photo Credit:
NY Post Tension Systems
43
ALTERNATIVE GRAVITY SYSTEM DESIGN:
PT TWO WAY SLAB
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
Alternative System:
Composite Floor System
Photo Credit: answers.com
57
ALTERNATIVE GRAVITY SYSTEM DESIGN
COMPOSITE FLOOR DESIGN
58
ALTERNATIVE GRAVITY SYSTEM DESIGN
COMPOSITE FLOOR DESIGN
59
ALTERNATIVE GRAVITY SYSTEM DESIGN
COMPOSITE FLOOR DESIGN
60
ALTERNATIVE GRAVITY SYSTEM DESIGN
COMPOSITE FLOOR DESIGN
61
ALTERNATIVE GRAVITY SYSTEM DESIGN
COMPOSITE FLOOR DESIGN
62
ALTERNATIVE GRAVITY SYSTEM DESIGN
COMPOSITE FLOOR DESIGN
63
ALTERNATIVE GRAVITY SYSTEM DESIGN
COMPOSITE FLOOR DESIGN
64
Cost Analysis and
Comparison of the Existing
and New Design
65
COST ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON
OF THE EXISTING AND NEW DESIGN
66
COST ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON
OF THE EXISTING AND NEW DESIGN
67
COST ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON
OF THE EXISTING AND NEW DESIGN
68
POWER POINT PRESENTATION
69
70
71
72
73
74