Trusteeship, Governance, and Audit Committee FY2012 Risk Assessment and Audit Plan August 15, 2011.

Post on 12-Jan-2016

217 views 4 download

Transcript of Trusteeship, Governance, and Audit Committee FY2012 Risk Assessment and Audit Plan August 15, 2011.

Trusteeship, Governance, and Audit Committee

FY2012 Risk Assessment and Audit Plan

August 15, 2011

2

FY2012 Audit Plan

KEY RISK AREAS BUSINESS RISK PLANNED ACTIVITY

INTERNAL AUDITS – ACADEMIC

ENTERPRISE

• Are faculty members utilized to their fullest potential, consistent with University policy and expectations? Are academic programs meeting the financial and societal goals established for them?

• Advise in the development of a methodology for confirming the achievement of faculty workload goals. Support the University-wide initiative for evaluating the viability of academic programs.

• Does the research and innovation division of the University conduct its financial business in a responsible and transparent manner, consistent with appropriate accounting principles?

• Review financial transactions of the University of Toledo Innovation Enterprises. Ensure that appropriated amounts were used for their intended purposes.

• Are internal processes and computer systems designed to facilitate the student processing experience?

• Support the University-wide initiative to improve student customer service through the implementation of system and process improvements that will minimize student wait time and complaints/concerns.

3

FY2012 Audit Plan

KEY RISK AREAS BUSINESS RISK PLANNED ACTIVITY

INTERNAL AUDITS – CLINICAL

ENTERPRISE

• Do construction and supply chain vendors doing business with the University comply with the provisions of their contracts?

• Review commercial contracts of selected vendors and projects. The Thermo Fisher Scientific supply chain contract has been selected for review thus far.

• Do the hospital and clinic computer systems under development promote a streamlined and secure process flow between the patient, Information Technology, and operating departments?

• Participate in the various “Meaningful Use” new clinical systems development projects as a controls consultant and identify opportunities for system and process integration between diverse stakeholder business functions.

• Is UTMC maximizing its potential with regard to customer satisfaction and nursing and physician productivity?

• Conduct a business process improvement review of nursing productivity. Perform a time-and-motion study of activities designed to prepare a room for an incoming patient in the most cost- and time-efficient manner possible.

4

FY2012 Audit Plan

KEY RISK AREAS BUSINESS RISK PLANNED ACTIVITY

SUPPORT FUNCTIONS

• Are payments made to employee medical benefit providers accurately, taking advantage of available discounts?

• Review medical benefit processing procedures, identifying and recovering erroneous and duplicate disbursements.

• Are the various methods for receiving and handling cash across the University known to management of the various operating departments? Does its processing comply with established financial procedures?

• Determine the sufficiency of cash management procedures across the University, including standardization between the academic and clinical enterprises. Conduct random cash handling audits across operating departments.

5

FY2012 Audit Plan

KEY RISK AREAS BUSINESS RISK PLANNED ACTIVITY

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

• Does the University comply with Payment Card Industry standards for network security when processing University credit card transactions at all locations?

• Self-Assess security and application controls over the computer networks that process student and patient credit card transactions. Independently evaluate compliance with these controls.

• Are issues identified during the testing of electronic transaction invoicing with vendors appropriately resolved prior to implementation?

• Review user testing of the Lawson system for Electronic Data Interchange invoicing transactions with various vendors.

• Have the system implications of the recent changes to the academic department organization been fully tested prior to implementation?

• Participate in the College Reorganization new systems development project as a controls consultant and review the nature and extent of user testing and acceptance.

• Is information and software processed in the data center environment secured and protected?

• Review IT “general controls”, such as information security and change control that impact numerous computer systems.

6

FY2012 Audit Plan

KEY RISK AREAS BUSINESS RISK PLANNED ACTIVITY

INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS

• Are revenues and expenses pertaining to intercollegiate athletics accounted for properly according to National Collegiate athletics Association (NCAA) rules and University policy?

• Evaluate the quality of financial controls over athletic student aid; guarantees; support staff/administrative salaries, benefits and bonuses paid by the University and related entities; severance payments; recruiting; equipment, uniforms, and supplies; game expenses; fundraising, marketing, and promotion; direct facilities, maintenance, and rental; spirit groups; indirect facilities and administrative support; medical expenses and medical insurance; and memberships and dues.

• Does the University appropriately record income from barter agreements, sports camps, and other athletics ventures?

• Review athletics revenue-generating agreements (“outside income”) and confirm that stated obligations have been met by all parties.

• Are football attendance statistics accurately recorded and reported in a timely manner to the NCAA?

• Review and certify attendance counts for all University home football games per NCAA regulations.

• Is University contact with prospective student-athletes in accordance with NCAA regulations, and is it being monitored accordingly and appropriately for all team sports?

• Review phone, email, Internet, and letter correspondence between coaches/administrators and prospective student-athletes on a surprise basis. Report results and monitor corrective action.

7

FY2012 Audit Plan

KEY RISK AREAS BUSINESS RISK PLANNED ACTIVITY

COMPLIANCE REVIEWS – ACADEMIC

ENTERPRISE

• Is financial aid awarded only to eligible students consistent with the terms of the various award programs?

• Review student financial aid procedures and test a sample of loans to ensure that eligibility requirements are met and financial aid is disbursed accurately.

• Are research and development expenses expended in accordance with the terms of individual grants and State, Federal, and University regulations?

• Review research grants procedures and test a sample of payroll expenses to ensure compliance with these procedures and external regulations.

• Are ethics issues reported by employees, students, and business partners resolved appropriately and in a timely manner?

• Update the Audit Committee on the nature and resolution of ethics reports made to the Anonymous Reporting Line.

• Are erroneous financial and operating transactions detected and acted upon in a timely manner?

• Develop and implement real-time exception reporting for audit follow-up purposes. Departmental “field” audits and ongoing purchase card (“p-card”) reviews will support execution of this objective..

8

FY2012 Audit Plan

KEY RISK AREAS BUSINESS RISK PLANNED ACTIVITY

COMPLIANCE REVIEWS – CLINICAL

ENTERPRISE

• Is UTMC taking appropriate steps to ensure compliance with Joint Commission accreditation standards on an ongoing basis?

• Review Joint Commission standards, determining whether effective UTMS problem identification/resolution procedures are in place relative to these standards.

• Is UTMC prepared for upcoming changes to coding of medical transactions?

• Review system and documentation requirements to ensure readiness for future ICD-10 coding classifications.

• Are all billable transactions captured at the time of inpatient diagnosis and fully reflected in customer bills?

• Review the accuracy and reliability of the charge master databases, the charge capture process, and procedures for maximizing inpatient margins.

• Does the compliance plan protect the academic and clinical enterprises from significant violations of the law and internal policies, as well as preserve the confidentiality of patient and student information?

• Update the Audit Committee on the nature and resolution of clinical and academic compliance and privacy events processed by the University (including HIPAA, FERPA, Stark Law, etc.)