Post on 26-Apr-2020
1
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLCBrustein & Manasevit, PLLC
New Flexibilities For Time and Effort Certifications
MIKE BENDER, ESQ.
MBENDER@BRUMAN.COM
BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC
FALL FORUM 2014
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLCBrustein & Manasevit, PLLC
TIME AND EFFORT STANDARDS
2
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
The BASICS – NO CHANGE!
• If federal funds are used for salaries, then time distribution records are required.
• How staff demonstrate allocability– If employee paid with federal funds, then must
show that the employee worked on that specific federal program cost objective.
3
2
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Participants – No Change!
• All employees paid with federal funds!!
• Some employees paid with non‐federal funds
• Part‐Time Employees• NOT contractors
4
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Current A‐87 Standards
Semi‐Annual Certifications
If an employee works on a single cost objective:
After the fact
Account for the total activity
Signed by employee orsupervisor
Every six months (at least twice a year)
Personnel Activity Report (PAR)
If an employee works on multiple cost objectives:
After the fact
Account for total activity
Signed by employee
Prepared at least monthly and coincide with one or more pay periods
5
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLCBrustein & Manasevit, PLLC6Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
3
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC7Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Current A‐21 standards
Plan Confirmation
Budgeted allocations for professional/professorial staff
Updated to reflect any significant changes in actual work
After‐the‐Fact Activity Reports
Professional/Professorial staff keep records every six months
All other employees keep monthly records
Signed by employee, principal investigator, or responsible official using suitable means of verification.
Must reflect activity applicable to each sponsored agreement and to each category needed to identify F&A costs
8
Variety of records kept in combination at least monthly.
Multiple Confirmation Records
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC9Brustein & Manasevit, PLLCBrustein & Manasevit, PLLC
4
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Current A‐122 standards
– After the fact
– Account for total activity
– Signed by employee or supervisor with first hand knowledge
– Prepared at least monthly and coincide with one or more pay periods
10
Personnel Activity Reports
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC11Brustein & Manasevit, PLLCBrustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLCBrustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Less Proscriptive Rules Means Significant
Flexibility in Adopting Own Processes
12
1
5
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
UNIFORM GRANT GUIDANCE standards
• Charges for salaries must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed1. Must be supported by a system of internal controls which
provides reasonable assurance charges are accurate, allowable and properly allocated
2. Be incorporated into official records
3. Reasonable reflect total activity for which employee is compensated
Percentages may be used for distribution of total activities
Not to exceed 100%13
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
UNIFORM GRANT GUIDANCE standards
4. Encompass all activities (federal and non‐federal)
5. Comply with established accounting polices and practices
6. Support distribution among specific activities or cost objectives
14
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
COFAR Comments on NEW Rule
By focusing more on internal controls, the rule “mitigatesthe risk that a non‐Federal entity… will focus on prescribedprocedures... which alone may be ineffective in assuringfull accountability.”
– Uncovering weaknesses in internal controls orinstances of fraud is goal. Not audit findings.
15
6
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLCBrustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Changes to “cost objective”
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Uniform grant guidance Cost Objectives
What is a cost objective? 200.28 (slightly changed) Now applies to IHEs!
Program, function, activity, award, organizational subdivision, contract, or work unit for which cost data are desired and for which provision is made to accumulate and measure the cost of processes, products, jobs, capital projects, etc.
17
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
UGG Cost Objectives (cont)
Multiple Cost Objectives 200.430(vii):
More than one Federal award.
A Federal award and a non‐Federal award.
An indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity.
Two or more indirect activities that are allocated using different allocation bases.
An unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost activity.
18
7
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLCBrustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Flexibility in Reporting An Employee’s Time
19
2
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Need for clarification
Always been confusion re: Cost objectives
Do you track funding source or track what employee is working on?
For example, Project Director of 21st CCLC after school program working 100% of her time on the 21st CCLC program but is paid 75% with 21st CCLC funds and 25% with State funds.
20
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Help!
21
Time and Effort Guidance by OCFO!!!
http://www2.ed.gov/policy/fund/guid/gposbul/time-and-effort-reporting.html
8
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OCFO Guidance
• It is possible to work on a single cost objective even if an employee works on more than one Federal award or on a Federal award and a non‐Federal award.
• The key to determining whether it is a single cost objective is whether the employee’s salary and wages can be supported in full from each of the Federal awards on which the employee is working or from the Federal award alone if the employee’s salary is also paid with non‐Federal funds.
22
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OCFO Guidance Example of Single Cost Objectives:
Title I, Part A funds and State compensatory education funds
• An LEA supports a supplemental math teacher to serve low‐achieving students with 50 percent Title I, Part A funds and 50 percent State compensatory education funds.
• Because the LEA could support the teacher’s entire salary with the Title I, Part A funding, it is a single cost objective.
23
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Ocfo guidance (cONT.)
• The guidance helps determine the number of cost objectives an employee is working on.
• Currently applies to state and local governments
• Under UGG, who will it apply to now?
– Could ED say it does not apply to the UGG requirements?
24
9
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Focus on iheS
• “It is recognized that teaching, research, service, and administration are often inextricably intermingled in an academic setting. When recording salaries and wages charged to Federal awards for IHEs, a precise assessment of factors that contribute to costs is therefore not always feasible, nor is it expected.”
25
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLCBrustein & Manasevit, PLLC
The Combination of Circulars Creates Subtle Differences
26
3
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Substitute Systems
• States, local governments and Indian tribes encouragedto adopt “substitute systems” if approved by cognizantagency for indirect cost. 200.430(i)(5)
• Still acceptable to allocate sampled employees’supervisors, clerical and support staffs, based on theresult of the sampled employees.
27
10
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Alternative Proposals
Cognizant agencies for indirect costs are encouraged to accept alternative proposals based on outcomes and milestones for program performance.
These plans are acceptable as alternatives to the UGG’s standards.
28
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Blended Funding
• A non‐Federal entity may submit performance plans that incorporate funds from multiple Federal awards and account for their combined use based on performance‐based metrics, if approved.
• Must submit a request for a waiver that includes certain information, including the method of charging costs.
29
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
USE OF BUDGET ESTIMATES
Budget estimates alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards 200.430(i)(1)(viii)
May be used for interim accounting purposes if:
Produces reasonable approximations
Significant changes to the corresponding work activity are identified in a timely manner
Internal controls in place to review after‐the‐fact interim charges based on budget estimates
30
11
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
documentation
If records meet the standards, the non‐federal entity will not be required to provide additional support or documentation for the work performed. 200.430(i)(2)
BUT, if records of grantee do not meet new standards, awarding agency may require PARs. 200.430(i)(8)
However, PARs are not defined!!!
31
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
SO What Does All this Mean??
32
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
What’s Next?
• Finalized Regulations/Effective Date
• Changes by ED?
• Change T&E policies?
• Auditor Input?
33
12
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Disclaimer
This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute legal advice or a legal service. This presentation does not create a client-lawyer relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC and, therefore, carries none of the protections under the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct. Attendance at this presentation, a later review of any printed or electronic materials, or any follow-up questions or communications arising out of this presentation with any attorney at Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC does not create an attorney-client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC. You should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first consulting legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances.
34