Post on 28-Mar-2015
The New Price Makers: An investigation into the impact of portfolio investment on coffee price
behaviour
Susan Newman
“Challenges and Prospects for Commodity Markets in the Global Economy”
A Workshop in Memory of Alfred Maizels
20th September 2008SOAS, University of London
Aims
• Assess the effectiveness of hedging on futures markets for income stabilisation
• Re-examine the relationship between futures and physical markets for coffee
• Challenge the notion that all futures trading activities are stabilising
• Show that price outcomes depend upon the composition of traders on futures markets differentiated by the motives behind their trading activities
Outline
• Stabilising vs. destabilising speculation
• Who are the traders and why do they trade in coffee futures?
• Implications of different types of trading activities on price behaviour
• Quantitative studies on trading and price behaviour on the coffee exchange of the NYBOT
• Supply and Demand vs. Trader Composition• Financial investment and short-term price movements
Stabilising vs. destabilising speculation
• Classical theory of speculation– Speculators as market makers– Constructive speculation (Marshall, 1932)– Speculation is always stabilising and beneficent.
• Neoclassical theory of speculation– Knightian definition of risk– Rational and informed speculators provide liquidity and enhance
the efficiency of the pricing mechanism
• Destabilising speculation– Movement trading (Irwin, 1937)– Post Keynesian theory of speculation– Performative economics (MacKenzie, 2005)
Who’s trading on the coffee exchange of the NYBOT?
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
03/0
8/19
71
03/0
7/19
73
03/0
7/19
75
03/0
6/19
77
03/0
6/19
79
03/0
5/19
81
03/0
5/19
83
03/0
4/19
85
03/0
4/19
87
03/0
3/19
89
03/0
3/19
91
03/0
2/19
93
03/0
2/19
95
03/0
1/19
97
03/0
1/19
99
02/2
8/20
01
02/2
8/20
03
02/2
7/20
05
Nu
mb
er o
f co
ntr
acts
Daily open interest on the coffee “C” market
(Data source: NYBOT 2007)
Hedgers Vs. Speculators I
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
ratio
of
no
n-c
om
me
rcia
l O
I to
to
tal O
I
Ratio of non-commercial open interest to total open interest in coffee C contracts on the New York Coffee Exchange
(Data source: NYBOT 2007)
Hedgers Vs. Speculators II
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
vo
lum
e e
qu
iva
len
t o
f C
co
ntr
acts
tra
de
d /
exp
ort
fro
m IC
O m
em
be
r
co
un
trie
s
Volume equivalent of C contracts traded per month divided by the monthly volume of arabica exports from ICO member countries
Data Source: NYBOT 2007; ICO 2007)
Investing in commodities“[C]ommodity markets have become more like financial markets in terms of the
motivations and strategies of participants” (Domanski and Heath 2007)
Why invest in commodities?• Commodities as an important portfolio diversifier
– As an inflation hedge
– Commodity price movements have traditionally been negatively correlated to price movements of other financial instruments (such as equities and bonds)
– While equities are bound by country-specific economic pressures, commodity prices tend to reflect the global economy
– Expect an inflow of funds on commodity markets during periods of global economic downturn associated with falling equities prices.
Who invests in commodities?• Institutional Investors
– Hedge funds– Pension funds
• Private investors• Retail investment
Breakdown of UK and European Exchange Traded Fund investorsfrom Doyle, Hill and Jack 2007
Implications of different types of trading activities on price behaviour
Where an inflow of funds onto commodity exchanges occurs as a consequence of changes in the wider economic environment (i.e. not owing to conditions in individual commodity markets) we might expect:
1. A loosening in the relationship between prices and supply and demand conditions.
2. A change in the short-run behaviour of prices that will depend upon the type of fund inflow
Supply and Demand Vs. Trader Composition We apply structural Bai-Perron (2003) break tests to series that describe:
1. the evolution of the total annual volume of trade in futures contracts on the New York Coffee exchange
2. the fraction of non-commercial futures open interest to total open interest for each year
3. the relationship between coffee prices and world supply & demand
Structural breaks in trading activities on the coffee exchange of the NYBOT
Series Specification Break date(s)
Annual volume of “C” contracts traded AR(1) 2001
Annual volume of “C” contracts traded AR(1) with time trend 1999
Annual ratio of non-commercial open interest to total open interest on the coffee “C” exchange
AR(1) 2001
Annual ratio of non-commercial open interest to total open interest on the coffee “C” exchange
AR(1) with time trend 1990
ttt ATVATV 1
ttt tATVATV 110
ttt ANCTOIRANCTOIR 1
ttt tANCTOIRANCTOIR 110
Structural breaks in the relationship between coffee prices and supply and demand
Coffee price model (Maizels, Bacon and Mavrotas 1997)
PCMCTSTfP
1210 tLPLSTRTLP
Best 3 break dates identified by Bai-Perron method
1994, 2000, 2004
Number if breaks selected by BIC
1
Break Date 1994
Intercepts 1.4332727529 (p-value 0.00163319)1.5442321270 (p-value 0.03369707)
Coefficient on LSTRT 1.6469755916 (p-value 0.00248171)1.3112557084* (p-value 0.10207228)
Coefficient on LPt-1 0.6761458959 (p-value 0.00002563)0.5857708346 (p-value 0.01673472)
Financial investment and short-term price movements
• We examine the simple correlation between financial investment in coffee futures and a computed instability index, or volatility index for the futures price (Labys and Thomas 1975)
• We construct monthly measures for volatility and financial investment for the period 1972-2006– Volatility Index (VI)
– Variable for financial investment (SPEC) defined as the natural logarithm of the ratio of the volume equivalent of coffee-C contracts traded and total exports of green coffee from ICO member countries
n
PP
PVI t
2100
Summary of results from Bai-Perron tests of multiple structural breaks in the relationship between financial investment and price volatility
(1980:01 to 2006:12) BIC
Best 5 break dates identified by Bai-Perron method
1981:03, 1981:09, 1987:06, 1994:04, 2000:10
1.33945
Best 4 break dates identified by Bai-Perron method
1980:05, 1986:11, 1994:04, 2000:10
1.37260
Best 3 break dates identified by Bai-Perron method
1987:06, 1994:04, 2000:10 1.38572
Best 2 break dates identified by Bai-Perron method
1994:04, 2000:10 1.44880
Best break date identified by Bai-Perron method
2000:10 1.53878
Number if breaks selected by BIC 1
Break Date 2000:10
ttt uSPECVI 21
Estimation results for for the 4 sub-periods between 1980:01 to 2006:12
ttt uSPECVI 21
Variable Estimated coefficient p-value
1980:01 to 1994:04, R-squared = 0.718231, R bar-squared = 0.048808, ρ = 0.233176
Constant -3.773838265 0.09257627
SPEC 0.836345100 0.00208172
1994:04 to 2000:10, R-squared = 0.839774, R bar-squared = 0.203926, ρ = 0.462745
Constant -45.75715604 0.00009639
SPEC 5.66135965 0.00001756
2000:10 to 2006:12, R-squared =0.861727 ,R bar-squared = 0.019330, ρ = 0.163134
Constant -3.171043700 0.46426916
SPEC 0.731497994 0.12120941
1994:04 to 2006:12, R-squared=0.790368, R bar-squared =0.007724, ρ = 0.180504
Constant -3.407337938 0.51972349
SPEC 0.855760676 0.14160197
Volatility Index vs. measure of financial investment
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Speculation Index (SPEC)
Vo
lati
lity
Ind
ex (
V)
1980:01 to 1994:04
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Speculation Index (SPEC)
Vol
atil
ity In
dex
(VI)
1994:04 to 2000:10
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Speculation Ratio (SPEC)
Vo
latil
ity I
nd
ex
2000:10 to 2006:12
Conclusions and further research
• The behaviour of coffee prices has been affected by the extent, as well as the type, of financial investment that has taken place on the coffee exchange of the NYBOT.
• The increase in coffee prices that took place from 2002-2007 can in part be attributed to financial investmetn rather than changes in supply and demand.
• Other studies have found excess comovement in prices of different, un-related commodities that has been attributed to portfolio diversification (Garrett and Taylor, 2001)
• A next step in this research is to investigate the extent to which coffee prices and the prices of unrelated commodities move together.
Thank you for your attention