Post on 06-Dec-2021
Peter Brett Associates LLP
The Future of Town Centres:Retail Planning Post NPPF(and does the PPG change things?)
Peter Keenan
Adam Bunn
5th June 2014
Peter Brett Associates LLP
About Peter Brett Associates
• Firm of development & infrastructure consultants
• Specialist nationwide retail planning team
• Peter Keenan and Adam Bunn lead retail work in the Midlands and London/South East
• Advise local authorities, retailers, developers and investors on retail planning
Peter Brett Associates LLP
Our Presentation Today
1. Some headlines on retail & town centre trends
2. NPPF on retail when ‘plan-making’
3. NPPF on retail when ‘decision taking’
4. Our view of retail planning post NPPF
Peter Brett Associates LLP
Trends…we used to only shop in shops...
So owners adapted the stock, developers built more space (in-town shopping centres) and the Council managed the parking and public realm
Peter Brett Associates LLP
…then, as the town centre grew ….
…space got built away from the High Street
•Supermarkets
•Regional Malls
•Retail Parks
Peter Brett Associates LLP
Now there are other ways to shop…
Internet sales are growing
Peter Brett Associates LLP
Recession was the tipping point…
• There were failures
• But more significantly we reached the point where less than 50% of sales were on the High Street
(Out of centre and the internet now took the rest)
Peter Brett Associates LLP
And what about food?
• 1990s-2000s – big is better
• 2010s onwards – shopping habits changing
Peter Brett Associates LLP
Dominant Trends• Market adjustment – with some failures
• Presence on high street less important – fewer shops
with bigger footplates in bigger places
• Retailers are adapting - Click and collect, mobile
shopping
• Investment in food retailing is changing – days of
hypermarket over – growth in convenience store ‘C-store’, online, discount and medium supermarkets are
priorities
So…how do these trends relate to the retail
planning in the post NPPF era?
Peter Brett Associates LLP
NPPF – ‘plan making’ – policy requirements
•Para #161 on evidence for town centre uses
•Quantitative & qualitative needs over plan
period
•Role & function of town centres
•Capacity of existing centres to accommodate
development
Peter Brett Associates LLP
NPPF – ‘plan making’ - requirements
• Para #23 on drawing up Local Plans
• Define network of centres and town
centre/primary shopping area boundaries
• Allocate range of sites so that needs for town
centre uses are met in full
• Use sequential test to allocate sites
• Set policies for consideration of out of centreproposals
• Para #26 references local floorspace threshold for impact assessments
Peter Brett Associates LLP
PPG on ‘plan making’ for retail…
• Importance of vision/town centre strategy
emphasized (para #2 and 3)
• Full account of ‘market signals’ (para #4)
• Health check indicators re-introduced (para #5)
• Where needs cannot be met in town centres –
can look to outside, subject to impact/sequential
(para #6)
• But now very limited guidance on how to
assess ‘need’
Peter Brett Associates LLP
Our view on the key challenge
‘allocate a range of suitable sites to meet the scale
and type of retail, leisure, commercial, office,
tourism, cultural, community and residential
development needed in town centres. It is
important that needs for retail, leisure, office
and other main town centre uses are met in full
and are not compromised by limited site
availability. Local planning authorities should
therefore undertake an assessment of the need to
expand town centres to ensure a sufficient supply
of suitable sites’
Peter Brett Associates LLP
Tensions from this Key Challenge
• Retail is dynamic/forecasts variable/uncertain…
• So allocating sites to meet town centre needs in
full over 15 years seems ambitious(this isn’t even required for housing…)
• Does this encourage ‘out of centre’ where
immediately available/suitable sites are scarce?
• Even so, PPG gives a way out by requiring
impact and sequential tests
• But importance of having up-to-date evidence,
strategies, policies and boundaries emphasised
Peter Brett Associates LLP
NPPF on ‘decision taking’
• Only really relevant where LP is out of date, or
the site is edge/out of centre – two key
requirements
• Sequential test (para # 24)
• Impact assessment (para # 26)
• Applications that fail sequential test or if there is
likely to be a significant adverse impact results in
refusal (para # 27)
Seems simple?...
Peter Brett Associates LLP
Sequential Test…
• Established by NPPF – no size threshold
• Case Law has established that this should apply
to the development proposed…
Tesco v Dundee Supreme Court Judgment
• Since enshrined in PPG
• But applicant still needs to demonstrate flexibility
Peter Brett Associates LLP
Implications of Sequential Test
• Flexibility cannot be ignored
• But applicants are in strong position with named tenants
• Business model promoted very important
Peter Brett Associates LLP
Impact Assessment…NPPF says…
• Required if over 2,500 sqm or local threshold - two strands
• Impact on investment in centres (existing, committed and planned)
• Impact on vitality and viability (consumer choice and trade)
• Trigger for refusal is likelihood of ‘significant adverse impact’
Peter Brett Associates LLP
Implications of Impact Assessment
• Is 2,500 sqm default threshold too high?
• Can be a subjective outcome
• What is ‘significantly adverse’ ?
Peter Brett Associates LLP
Our View of Retail Planning post NPPF
1. Plans and evidence needs to be up-to-date
2. Central opportunity sites need to be proactively promoted
3. Local policies should be drafted to respond to out of centre proposals and a local impact threshold should be set
4. If considering edge/out of centre in policy – ensure impact is assessed
Peter Brett Associates LLP
Our View of Retail Planning Post NPPF
5. Increased emphasis on market signals in retail planning
6. Schemes with named retailers are in stronger positions under the sequential test
7. But we have observed increased speculative proposals across the country
8. Promises of new retailers/jobs out of centre vs. harm to town centres