Post on 29-Jan-2015
description
1
The Effect of Natural Resources on Income Inequality
Byron Hewson
University of Queensland
2
Introduction
Global Income Inequality – Gini Coefficients
Introduction
3
Natural Resources
Wealth
Resource Sector Growth
Decline in Non-Resource Sectors
Inequality
Decline in Institutional
Quality
Policy Distortions and Myopia
Increased Corruption and Rent-Seeking
Introduction
4
Natural Resources
Wealth
Resource Sector Growth
Decline in Non-Resource Sectors
Inequality
Decline in Institutional
Quality
Policy Distortions and Myopia
Increased Corruption and Rent-Seeking
5
Introduction
Background
6
1. What makes natural resources wealth different from other sources of wealth?
2. Why does income inequality matter?
Natural Resources
Defining “Natural Resources”:
● A subset of “natural capital” which includes subsoil assets, timber resources and protected areas.
“Subsoil Assets” or “Non-Rural Commodities” =
Mineral resources – e.g. copper, iron, gold
PLUS
Energy Resources – e.g. oil, coal gas
7
8
Natural Resources
Distinct Characteristics of Natural Resources
1. High economic rents and relatively high volatility
2. Extracted and non-renewable
3. Cognitive impact in perception and treatment by state and non-state actors
4. High inequality in ownership and susceptibility to rent-seeking behaviour
Why is Inequality Important?
1. Inequality can impact on economic growth
9
Why is Inequality Important?
2. Inequality is important for reducing poverty
10
Growth and Inequality Elasticities of PovertyElasticities Comparative ratio
Growth (1) Inequality (2) Absolute (1)/(2)
Sub-Saharan Africa -1.51 1.56 0.97
Africa -1.82 2.16 0.91
East Asia and Pacific -2.48 3.49 0.71
Eastern Europe and Western Asia
-4.22 6.85 0.62
Latin America and Caribbean -3.08 5.00 0.62
Middle East and Central Asia
-2.75 3.91 0.70
South Asia -2.10 2.68 0.78
Source: Compiled from Fosu (2011).
Why is Inequality Important?
3. Inequality impacts on welfare
11
Inequality
Discontent Crime Health
Data
Measures of Natural Resources:
1. Resource Rents (%GDP)
2. Subsoil Assets (log, per capita)
3. Resource Exports (%Total Merchandise Exports)
Instrument:
1. Value of resource stocks in 1970 (Norman, 2009)
2. Subsoil Assets
12
Data
Measures of Natural Resources:
1. Resource Rents (%GDP)
2. Subsoil Assets (log, per capita)
3. Resource Exports (%Total Merchandise Exports)
Instrument:
1. Value of resource stocks in 1970 (Norman, 2009)
2. Subsoil Assets
13
Data
Measure of Inequality:
● Gini Coefficients (UNU-WIDER)
Measure of Institutional Quality
1. Aggregate of six World Bank Governance Indicators
Voice and Accountability, Political Violence, Government Effectiveness, Regulatory Quality, Rule of Law, Control of Corruption
2. Economic Freedom of the World Index - EFW (Fraser Institute)
3. Corruption Perception Index – CPI (Transparency International)
14
Data Coverage
15
Econometric Specification
16
Relevant features of the model:
1.Three equations and three jointly determined variables; income inequality (G), institutional quality (IQ), and per-capita income (Y).
2.Incorporates enough exclusion restrictions to guarantee identification of the equations - all of the equations are overidentified.
3.The vector of control variables in each equation contain a number of variables that exhibit endogeneity and correlation with the disturbances.
Econometric Specification
17
Estimation Procedure – GMM-3SLS Estimator :
1.Jointly determined variables are regressed on all of the control variables included in the system, using a GMM estimator to instrument the endogenous controls in the reduced form equations.
2.Predicted values of the jointly determined variables generated from the reduced form equations are substituted into the structural equations. The endogenous controls in structural equations are instrumented using GMM.
3.Structural equations are jointly estimated using 3SLS.
Results – Preferred Measures
18
Dep. Variable gini Dep. Variable govt_ind Dep. Variable logGDPpc
resource_rent 0.261*** resource_rent -0.299*** resource_rent 0.005
govt_ind -9.510*** gini -0.022*** govt_ind 0.317***
logGDPpc 3.325 logGDPpc 0.758*** gini -0.003
trade_open 0.024*** malaria -0.035 education 0.007***
polity2 0.466*** education -0.001 phys_capital -0.004
m2 0.007 aid -0.001** trade_open 0.001***
ethnic_frag 5.886*** ethnic_frag 0.317 coast 0.003
land_gini 0.138*** latitude 0.992*** malaria -0.463***
govt_spending 0.029 socialist_legal -0.749***
govt_system -5.957*** english_legal -0.107
resource_rent*govt_ind
0.209* french_legal -0.404***
german_legal -0.143**
Obs . 156 Obs . 156 Obs . 156
R-squared 0.664 R-squared 0.791 R-squared 0.785
Results – Alternative Measures of Institutional Quality
19
Governance Indicators
● Political violence, voice and accountability, and the rule of law all have a significant negative effect on inequality
● Resource rents have a significant negative effect on each of the indicators, except control of corruption
Corruption Perception Index (CPI)
● There is no significant relationship between CPI and inequality and resource rent and CPI
Economic Freedom of the World (EFW)
● Resource rent has a significant negative effect on EFW and EFW has a significant positive effect on inequality
Results – Subsoil Assets and Resource Exports
20
Dep. Variable gini gini Dep. Variable govt_ind govt_ind
subsoil_assets 1.869*** subsoil_assets 0.086***
resource_exports 0.053* resource_exports -0.003*
govt_ind -6.483*** -9.333*** gini -0.010 -0.027***
logGDPpc 2.553 3.200 logGDPpc 0.497*** 0.414***
trade_open 0.020* 0.035** education 0.004* 0.002
polity2 0.581** 0.329** aid -0.001 -0.001**
m2 0.032 0.009 ethnic_frag -0.155 0.152
ethnic_frag 7.622*** 3.486 latitude 1.880*** 1.286***
land_gini 0.170*** 0.187*** socialist_legal -0.851*** -0.793***
govt_spending 0.201 0.184 english_legal -0.066 -0.061
govt_system -5.608*** -5.245*** french_legal -0.341*** -0.242***
german_legal -0.226*** -0.088
Obs . 129 146 Obs . 129 146
R-squared 0.727 0.698 R-squared 0.794 0.771
Results – Summary
21
1. Natural resource wealth, abundance, and intensity, consistently increases income inequality.
2. Both resource wealth and resource intensity decrease institutional quality. Conversely, resource abundance positively affects institutional quality.
3. The direct marginal impact of resource wealth and resource intensity on income inequality depends on the level of institutional quality.
4. The effect of resource wealth and resource intensity on inequality is robust to broader measures of natural resources
Policy Implications
22
Policymakers must ensure that:
1. Resource wealth is not misappropriated
2. Benefits of resource wealth are shared both within society and across generations
Overall Aim: transforming non-renewable resource wealth into other forms of wealth which can
provide sustainable growth
Policy Implications
23
Achieving inclusive growth
1. Taxation of natural resource wealth
2. Distribution and investment of natural resource wealth
Policy Implications
24
Taxation of natural resource wealth
1. Efficient 2. Competitive 3. Stable and Transparent4. Flexible and Responsive
Policy Implications – Taxation
25
1. Efficient
• Profit-based taxes encourage exploitation of lower grade ore and recognise risks in mining and mineral price fluctuations but are more difficult to administer than royalties
Policy Implications – Taxation
26
2. Competitive
Policy Implications – Taxation
27
3. Stable and Transparent
Policy Implications – Taxation
28
4. Flexible and Responsive
Mining Cycle:
1. Exploration – Mineral Development Funds, carrying forward losses
2. Mine Development – depreciation allowance, low VAT and duties, tax deductions for
infrastructure
3. Production – tax changes with price fluctuations
4. Post-Mining – tax deductions for rehabilitation funds
Policy Implications – Distribution and Investment
29
• Sovereign wealth fund (Norway)
• Direct Distribution (US, Canada)
• Tax Cuts (Australia)
• Public Goods (Indonesia)
• Infrastructure (PNG, DRC)
Conclusion
30
• Natural resources increase income inequality
• Improved institutional quality decreases income inequality
• Resource wealth tends to decrease institutional quality, though resource abundance need not necessarily lead to a decline in institutional quality
• Resource policy must concentrate on limiting expropriation of resources
• Efficient and equitable taxation must be combined with long term resource utilisation strategies
• Political and social institutions are pivotal in determining the effect of natural resources
Thank you for listening
31