The Cycle of Reimbursement Models

Post on 27-May-2015

1.230 views 2 download

Tags:

description

Reimbursement models have changed over time throughout the 20th century. Learn about the changes, the differences in payment models, future strategies for the government, commercial payers and providers, as well as the return to a more ACO-focused payment model. This presentation is part of our Accountable Care Organization series.

Transcript of The Cycle of Reimbursement Models

The Cycle of Reimbursement ModelsAdele AllisonNational Director of Government Affairs, SuccessEHS

Brief History of Reimbursement Models

1917

Lumberjacks of the NorthwestFull Risk, Community-Based

The BluesThird-party Fee-for-Service (FFS), Community-based

1929-39

Commercial FFSEmployer-sponsored Health Coverage

1940-60s

1965

Government FFSMedicare & Medicaid

Physician Fee SchedulesAnd Diagnosis Related Groups

1974-89

Partial to Full RiskCapitation, Health Maintenance Organizations (HMO), Preferred Provider Organizations (PPO)

1985-90s

Costs Outpacing InflationBoomers, Increased Patient Portion, Leading to Accountable Care Organizations (ACO)

2000s

2012

ACOs to be ImplementedA Return to Community-Based Care

Reimbursement Strategies

GovernmentStrategies

1

Legislation & PolicyMove from Pay-for-Service to Pay-for-Value

1997 - BBASustainable Growth Rate (SGR) Formula

2006 - TRHCAPhysician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) – Defined Value

2009 - ARRAEHR Adoption, Clinical Data Reporting and Evidence-based Care

2010 - PPACAValue-based Modifiers, Episode Groupers, Bundled Payments

ISSUEMedicare Sustainable Growth Rate Formula = 27.4% Adjustment

CommercialPayer

Strategies

2

Reimbursement ModelsCapitation, Withholds, FFS, Bundling

ISSUEMedicare Sustainable Growth Rate Formula = 27.4% Adjustment

ProviderStrategies

3

Defense Strategies, Large Group Practice, Employment, Concierge Practice

Example: Full Risk, or Capitation / Provider Risk

ABC Health Plan Enrollees

Dr. Red Dr. Blue

ABC Health Plan Enrollees

Dr. Red Dr. Blue

1,000 Patients 500 Patients

ABC Health Plan Enrollees

Dr. Red Dr. Blue

1,000 PatientsMedian Age 27

500 PatientsMedian Age 58

ABC Health Plan Enrollees

Dr. Red Dr. Blue

1,000 PatientsMedian Age 27

100 have Chronic Disease

500 PatientsMedian Age 58

350 have Chronic Disease

ABC Health Plan Enrollees

Dr. Red Dr. Blue

1,000 PatientsMedian Age 27

100 have Chronic Disease

$10 PMPM

500 PatientsMedian Age 58

350 have Chronic Disease

$10 PMPM

ABC Health Plan Enrollees

Dr. Red Dr. Blue

1,000 PatientsX

$10 PMPM=

$10,000 / Month

500 PatientsX

$10 PMPM=

$5,000 / Month

ABC Health Plan Enrollees

Dr. Red Dr. Blue

20 Patients / Month

X $75 Average Collection per Visit

$1,500 / Month

FFS Cost = Good

100 Patients / MonthX $75 Average

Collection per Visit$7,500 / Month

FFS Cost = Bad

ABC Health Plan Enrollees

Dr. Red Dr. Blue

ADVERSE SELECTION

Example: Fee-for-Service, or Health Plan / Employer Risk

Episodic Care(interventions aimed at patient cure or

restoration to previous level of functioning)

Vs.Over-Utilization

(Excessive or unnecessary utilization of health services by patients or physicians)

Episodic Care

Episodic Care

Disjointed care continuum

Episodic Care

Disjointed care continuumLimited prevention

Episodic Care

Disjointed care continuumLimited prevention

Inadequate chronic disease management

Episodic Care

Disjointed care continuumLimited prevention

Inadequate chronic disease managementUnengaged patient

Episodic Care

Disjointed care continuumLimited prevention

Inadequate chronic disease managementUnengaged patient

Conflicting care plans

Episodic Care

Disjointed care continuumLimited prevention

Inadequate chronic disease managementUnengaged patient

Conflicting care plansTreatment duplication

Episodic Care

Disjointed care continuumLimited prevention

Inadequate chronic disease managementUnengaged patient

Conflicting care plansTreatment duplicationPoor quality and safety

Over Utilization

Over Utilization

Provider paid fee for every service

Over Utilization

Provider paid fee for every serviceIncents unnecessary treatments

Over Utilization

Provider paid fee for every serviceIncents unnecessary treatments

No accountability

Over Utilization

Provider paid fee for every serviceIncents unnecessary treatments

No accountabilityNo incentive to manage chronic disease

Over Utilization

Provider paid fee for every serviceIncents unnecessary treatments

No accountabilityNo incentive to manage chronic disease

“Take what I can get” mentality

Over Utilization

Episodic Care

INCREASED RISK

For more information about industry trends, visit www.successehs.com for white papers, articles, blog posts and more!

Click here for our industry blog