The Cognitive Agent

Post on 23-Feb-2016

52 views 0 download

Tags:

description

The Cognitive Agent. Overcoming informational limits Orlin Vakarelov Philosophy & Cognitive Science University of Arizona. Synopsis. Question: What are the systems for which the capacity of cognition is useful and what “function” does it serve? Answer: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The Cognitive Agent

The Cognitive AgentThe Cognitive Agent

Overcoming informational limits

Orlin VakarelovPhilosophy & Cognitive ScienceUniversity of Arizona

SynopsisSynopsisQuestion:

◦ What are the systems for which the capacity of cognition is useful and what “function” does it serve?

Answer:◦ The “function” of cognition is to allow

informationally deprived autonomous agents to overcome the informational deficit so that they can have more successful behaviour.

◦ In a sense, cognition is that which makes agents smarter.

Cognitio 09 2

Cognition vs. cognitionCognition is essentially an embedded and

embodied phenomenon, and is related to system control of the dynamical interactions with environment.

Cognition is a phenomenon of complexity, i.e. it exist only within complex, organized systems, and it is possible in virtue of the complexity.

AssumptionsAssumptions

3Cognitio 09

A minimal approachA minimal approachMaturana & Varela1 – autopoiesis

◦ A system is autopoiesis iff it can actively maintain itself by implementing a process closure, and it can maintain separation from the environment.

M & V claim: Autopoiesis implies both life and cognition.◦ Natural teleology, self-reference, meaning,

perspective (umwelt), etc.Di Paolo2: Autopoiesis is a structural condition,

while adaptiveness is not. Cognition requires adaptiveness. Therefore, autopoiesis does not cognition.

1 H. R. Maturana & F. J. Varela (1980) Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Dordecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co 2 Di Paolo, E. A., (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(4): 429 - 452. 4Cognitio 09

MethodologyMethodologyBottom-up approach

◦ The theoretical distinctions must correspond to natural dynamical/system theoretic distinctions arising from the increasing complexity of organization of the systems.

◦ I.e. if you are wondering among various systems, you should be able to stumble on the collection of cognitive system.

I describe a sequence of nested design problems whose general strategies for solution warrant theoretical distinctions – cognition is viewed as one such general strategy for a problem.

Autonomy Agency Cognitive Agency

5Cognitio 09

AutonomyAutonomy

6Cognitio 09

AutonomyAutonomy

7Cognitio 09

AgentsAgents

8Cognitio 09

Informational LimitsInformational Limits

9Cognitio 09

Sequence of problems Sequence of problems and systemsand systems

Cognitio 09 10

Cognitive Agents Cognitive Agents

11Cognitio 09

Back to the familiarBack to the familiar Two general strategies for CIE lowering

◦ Internalize efficiently information from the environment so that you don’t have to communicate it.

◦ Focus on the most relevant source of information. More specific strategies:

◦ accumulation and integration of information over time; ◦ targeting specific useful feature of the environment; ◦ building internal structures that encode information

about the environment and its dynamics, and using them to anticipate the future state of the environment based on limited information from perception;

◦ going beyond the immediate information thought informational transformations (with reasoning capacities), etc.

The prototypical cognitive capacities accomplish exactly such tasks: learning, memory, feature detection, representation, reasoning, etc.

12Cognitio 09