Team Shock Therapy: Tim Blake, David Bankhead, Travis McMillen 1.

Post on 12-Jan-2016

220 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of Team Shock Therapy: Tim Blake, David Bankhead, Travis McMillen 1.

1

CHARACTERIZING BATTERY

REJUVENATORS

Team Shock Therapy: Tim Blake, David Bankhead, Travis McMillen

2

Presentation outline

Background Process of Defining the Project Our Problem Definition/Goal Test Setups Procedure Design Matrix Future Work

3

Background

Goal of Acoustic Research Detachment Create quieter

NAVY vehicles Use lead-acid

batteries to power their vehicles

A ship uses hundreds of batteries Example: LSV-2

Cutthroat Batteries need to

be replaced every 4 years

NAVY wants to improve battery performance

4

Process of Defining the Project

NAVY Originally CCCV vs. Pulse Analyze rejuvenators Indications of health of battery

University of Idaho Navy specs not design, need design project!

5

Project Definition/Goals

Project Definition Navy needs a reliable way to extend the life of

their batteries. They are considering using battery

rejuvenators. Project Goal

Design a procedure/algorithm that the Navy can use to characterize their rejuvenators.

6

Test setups

Rint

VOC VLoaded

I

Figure 3: Internal Resistance Test Setup

Figure 2: Discharge Test SetupFigure 1: Rejuvenation Test Setup

7

Procedure

Discharged Battery

Internal Resistance

Measurement

Rejuvenate Battery

Internal Resistance

Measurement

Discharge Battery

Perform Calculations

Decision

Matrix

8

Design Matrix

Compared Spec Sheets 35 Ah rating

Renaissance RC-2A12-2 BatteryMinder Renaissance RC20A-12-240 Max value Min value standard

Capacity Restoration 80% 95% 65% 100% 0 1.000

Internal Resistance 0.097691279 0.110684674 0.354608217 100% 0 1

Time Taken (h) 100 5.579732407 11.13221521 24 0 24

 

Renaissance RC-2A12-2 BatteryMinder Renaissance RC20A-12-240 Weight

Capacity Restoration 0.80 0.95 0.65 60%

Internal Resistance 10% 11% 35% 20% Legend

Time Taken (h) -3.17 0.77 0.54 20% -1 - 0.3 Terrible, do not use

0.3 - 0.7 Okay

-0.132277439 0.744766765 0.565751983 0.7-1 Great

9

Future work

Automated control system Verification of 2 Volt batteries Quantify Internal resistance of batteries Compare constant current constant

voltage to pulse rejuvenators First 10 min. of a rejuvenation.

10

First 10 min. of Rejuv.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011.511.611.711.811.9

1212.112.2

Rejuvenation of Used Battery #3 with Bat-teryMINDer Rejuvenator

Time (Minutes)

Volt

age (

V)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011.811.9

1212.112.212.312.412.512.6

Rejuvenation of Unused Battery #4 with BatteryMINDer Rejuvenator

Time (Minutes)

Volt

age (

V)

11

Conclusions

Pulse rejuvenators work BatteryMINDer works the best

Most important characteristics have been determined in characterizing a rejuvenator

Difference between two batteries pulsing in first 10 min.

Recommend pulse charging for the next charge setup

12

Special Thanks to….

Acoustic Research Detachment of the Navy

Jim Klein Dr. Herb Hess Dr. Greg Donohoe Dr. Touraj Assefi

13

QUESTIONS