Post on 04-Apr-2018
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
1/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
1
The TAG 2012SWS Surveys on Corruption
Public Presentation of Results
24 October 2012, Cagayan De Oro
25 October 2012, Cebu City
2TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
A. Survey Design
B. Survey Results1) PUBLIC SECTOR CORRUPTION2) SINCERITY IN FIGHTING CORRUPTION3) GOVERNMENT EFFORTS TO FIGHT CORRUPTION
4) PROSECUTION OF HIGH PROFILE CORRUPTION CASES5) ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE6) TRANSACTIONS WITH GOVERNMENT7) PRIVATE SECTOR CORRUPTION8) BUSINESS EFFORTS TO FIGHT CORRUPTION9) HONEST BUSINESS PRACTICES10) THE BUSINESS CLIMATE
C. Summary of Findings
3TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
a. Are Time Series 10 rounds in National Capital Region (2000-09, 2012) 7 rounds in Metro Cebu (2004-09, 2012) 7 rounds in Metro Davao (2004-09, 2012) 5 rounds in Cavite-Laguna-Batangas and Cagayan
de Oro-Iligan (2005-07; 2009, 2012) 1 round in Metro Angeles (2012) 1 round in Metro Iloilo (2012)
b. Are Stratified by Size
2/3 weight: Small & Medium Enterprises 1/3 weight: Large Enterprises.
THE SWS SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES, 2000 TO 2012
4TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
Total Small & ErrorFieldwork Dates TotalArea Sample Large Medium Margin
Aug 14 Oct 26 2000 NCR 604 204 400 4%
Sep 4 Dec 4 2001 NCR 505 200 305 4%
Oct 25 Feb 25 2002/03 NCR 500 214 286 4%
Nov 13 Jan 28 2003/04 NCR/Ceb/Dav 701 285 416 4%
Jan 21 Mar 15 2005 NCR/CLB/Ceb/Dav/CDO-I 701 232 469 4%
Feb 18 Apr 27 2006 NCR/CLB/Ceb/Dav/CDO-I 700 231 469 4%
Mar 4 May 11 2007 NCR/CLB/Ceb/Dav/CDO-I 703 233 470 4%
Sep 9 Oct 10 2008 NCR/Ceb/Dav 402 135 267 5%
Nov 3 Dec 5 2009 NCR/CLB/Ceb/Dav/CDO-I 550 184 366 4%
Jul 16 Oct 16 2012 7 areas (target 950) 972 326 646 3%
NCR: National Capital Region (target 350) 372 127 245 5%
Ang: Metro Angeles (new) 100 33 67 10%
CLB: Cavite-Laguna-Batangas 100 33 67 10%
Ilo: Metro Iloilo (new) 100 33 67 10%
Ceb: Metro Cebu 100 33 67 10%
Dav: Metro Davao 100 33 67 10%
CDO-I:Cagayan de Oro/Iligan City 100 33 67 10%
THE SWS SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES, 2000 TO 2012: SURVEYDATES AND SAMPLE SIZES
6TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
7 Areas 972 246 726
NCR 372 126 246
METRO ANGELES 100 22 78
CALABA 100 27 73
METRO ILOILO 100 15 85
METRO CEBU 100 13 87
METRO DAVAO 100 18 82
CDO-I 100 25 75
THE SWS SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES, 2012:Integrity Initiative Signatories in the Sample
Total Total Total
2012 Integrity Initiative non-IIinterviews (II) signatories signatories
9TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
Fieldwork Sample Error
Dates Sizes Margins
The SWS May 24-27, 2012 National Survey of Adultsalso has corruption items
PHILIPPINES : May 24-27 1,200 3%
Metro Manila : May 24-27 300 6%Balance Luzon : May 24-27 300 6%
Visayas : May 24-27 300 6%Mindanao : May 24-27 300 6%
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
2/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
2
10TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
1) PUBLIC SECTOR CORRUPTION
11TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: EXTENT OF CORRUPTION IN THEPUBLIC SECTOR, 2000 TO 2012
A lot
Some
A little
None
63
77
6065 66 67 61 64 64
43
25
19
2926 28 28 33 31 32
44
104
10 65 5 5 4 3
12
2 1 2 1 1 0.3 1 1 0.2
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
14TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SAYING THERE IS A LOT OF CORRUPTION IN
THE PUBLIC SECTOR, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
6470
6357
66
56
43
51
27
39
47
33
4640
All areas NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
15TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SAYING THERE IS A LOT OF CORRUPTION IN
THE PUBLIC SECTOR, BY AREA, 2000 TO 2012
63
77
60
6763
58
71
59
66
58
6467
72
63
71
6165
62
5760
45
71
5955
70
63
57
66
56
51
39
33
46
40
NCR CLB CEB DAV CDO-I
27
47
ANG ILO
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
19TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES VS. GEN. PUBLIC: EXTENT OF CORRUPTION INTHE PUBLIC SECTOR, 2012
Enterprises Gen. Public
33% 51%
5%11%
None
A lotSome
A little
44%
43%
0.2%12%
None
A lotSome
A little
21TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT WHERE CORRUPTIONHAPPENS, 2009 and 2012
Q32.Among the different levels of government, where do you think corruption happens? Is it at the? (MULTIPLERESPONSE ALLOWED)
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Public Sector
Nationalgovernment
City/municipalgovernment
Provincialgovernment
Barangaygovernment
93
65 67
48
8178 72
54
2009 2012
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
3/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
3
23TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT WHERE CORRUPTIONHAPPENS, BY AREA, 2012
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Public Sector
80 8085 84
81 83 8085
63 64
8579
64
81
7266
70
78
74 74 73
61
51
35
69
4145
58
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
National City/Municipal Provincial Barangay
24TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES WHERECORRUPTION HAPPENS THE MOST, 2012
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Public Sector
70%
61%
54%
49%
Middle- level managers
Supervisors
Cabinet-level/top-levelmanagement officials
Rank and file employees
25TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES WHERECORRUPTION HAPPENS THE MOST, BY AREA, 2012
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Public Sector
Middle-levelmanagers
Supervisor Cabinet-level Rank and fileemployees
71
6562
6669
75 75
67
46 47
71
5962
58
43
56
68
57 5961 5955
44
36
58
5045
40
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
28TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: PERCEIVED NUMBER OF COMPANIES IN OWNLINE OF BUSINESS THAT GIVE BRIBES TO WINPUBLIC SECTOR CONTRACTS, 2000 TO 2012
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Public Sector
Almost all
Most
Few
Hardly any
None
2315
22 23 21 17 18 15 18 15
3241
35 34 3330 30 30
3026
24 25 23 24 2527 27 28
2930
8 8 7 7 78 9 11
79
11 10 12 11 13 17 14 15 14 17
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
30TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SAYING MOST/ALMOST ALL COMPANIES IN MY LINE OF
BUSINESS GIVE BRIBES TO WIN PUBLIC SECTOR CONTRACTS ,
BYAREA, 2000 TO 2012
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Public Sector
NCR CLB CEB DAV CDO-IANG ILO
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
55565757
64
5252
47
54
58
65
46 47 4750
38
42
51
56
49
57
49 48
35
50
4446
49
45
40
33
45 45 4442 40
32TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: MEDIAN PERCENTAGE OF CONTRACT ALLOTEDAS BRIBE FOR PUBLIC SECTOR CONTRACT,
2005 TO 2012
Q36. In instances when bribery happens, what percentage of an average contract is allotted for bribes towin public sector contracts?
2005*** 15%2006*** 20
2007*** 20
2008** 20
2009*** 20
2012**** 20
Base: Total Who Say Companies in Their Sector Allot a Percentage for Bribes to Win Public
Sector Contracts
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
4/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
4
35TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
3125 25 29 29 23 21
16
16 1315 12
1412
911
10
1313
1010
1415
14
1212
1412
24 27
28
25 2731
34
03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
ENTERPRISES: LAST TIME ONE HAD PERSONAL KNOWLEDGEOF PUBLIC SECTOR CORRUPTION IN OWN SECTOR OF
BUSINESS, 2003/04 TO 2012Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Public Sector
Last month
2-3 mos. ago
4-6 mos. ago
6-12 mos. ago
>1 yr ago
37TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: THE LAST TIME OF PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OFA CORRUPT TRANSACTION WITH GOVERNMENT IN ONES
SECTOR OF BUSINESS, BY AREA, 2012
Last month
2-3 mos. ago
4-6 mos. ago
6-12 mos. ago
>1 yr ago
2520
10 20 22 22 21
149
513 12 11 14
109
9
10 11 11 11
1313
9
14 15 14 9
2940
53
33 30 27 34
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
40TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: WHETHER CORRUPTION IS WRONG BECAUSE ITIS IMMORAL OR BECAUSE IT HURTS THE COUNTRYS
DEVELOPMENT, 2000 TO 2012
Corruptionhurts thecountrysdevelopment
Corruption isimmoral
Both[volunteered]
41 32 45 41 50 37
47 4955
56 49 62
1119
1 3 1 1
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '12****42
TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISESON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: WHETHER CORRUPTION IS WRONG BECAUSE IT ISIMMORAL OR BECAUSE IT HURTS THE COUNTRYS DEVELOPMENT,
BY AREA, 2012
Corruptionhurts thecountrysdevelopment
Corruption isimmoral43 41
21
37 36 35 34
56 59
77
63 62 64 66
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
45TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES VS GENERAL PUBLIC: WHETHER SOURCES OFCORRUPTION ARE CITIZENS WHO BRIBE OR GOVT EMPLOYEES
WHO ASK FOR BRIBES, 2012
Enterprises Gen. Public
28%67%
5%DK etc
31%60%
The citizenswho bribe
The govtemployees who ask
for bribes
DK etcThe citizenswho bribe
9%
The govtemployees who ask
for bribes
46TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: WHETHER SOURCES OF CORRUPTION ARECITIZENS WHO BRIBE OR GOVT EMPLOYEES WHO ASK FOR
BRIBES, BY AREA, 2012
The citizenswho bribe
The govtemployeeswho ask for
bribes64
5668
6252 48
61
2635
21 3141
40
32
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
5/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
5
49TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES VS. GENERAL PUBLIC:WHETHER A BUSINESSMAN OR A GOVT OFFICIAL IS TO BLAME
WHEN CORRUPTION HAPPENS, 2012
The official only
Mostly the businessman
Mostly the official
The businessman only
818
209
67 64
33
13
Enterprises Public
Both are equally to blame
51TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: WHETHER A BUSINESSMAN OR A GOVT
OFFICIAL IS TO BLAME WHEN CORRUPTION HAPPENS,BY AREA, 2012
The official only
Mostly thebusinessman
Mostly the official
The businessmanonly
Both are equallyto blame
7 7 7 8 9 9 9
24 2312
21 2014
19
65 6576
67 64 74 67
3 3 2 3 42 3
0.3 1 3 1 1 2
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
53TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: WHETHER CAREER GOVERNMENT OFFICERS ORPOLITICAL APPOINTEES ARE MORE SINCERE IN IMPLEMENTING
ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICIES, BY AREA, 2012
Politicalappointeesare moresincere
Career govtofficers are
more sincere7063
74 7280 78
70 72
2430
20 2417 17
24 22
All Areas NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
55TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES VS. GENERAL PUBLIC: COMPARING THEDEGREE OF GRAFT AND CORRUPTION UNDER
PNOY ADMIN VS PGMA ADMIN, 2012
Q37. If you compare the present administration with that of former President Arroyo, would you say that
the degree of graft and corruption is ?
Base: Those who say there is corruption in the public sector
Enterprises Gen. Public
More now
Less now
Same asbefore
Same asbefore
More now
Less now2% 5%
25%29%
73%64%
57TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: COMPARING THE DEGREE OF GRAFT ANDCORRUPTION UNDER PNOY ADMIN VS PGMA ADMIN,
BY AREA, 2012Base: Those who say there is corruption in the public sector
More nowSame asbefore
Less now75
57
72 71 70 71
84
20
39
24 25 27 28
15
3 3 4 1 21
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
59TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES VS. GENERAL PUBLIC:EXTENT OF KNOWLEDGE OF THE PNOY ADMINS
ANTI-CORRUPTION EFFORTS, 2012
Q38. How much do you know about the current efforts of the government to fight corruption?
Base: Those who say there is corruption in the public sector
Enterprises Gen. PublicNone at allAlmost no
knowledge Extensiveknowledge5%
14%
62%
Littleknowledge
15%Extensiveknowledge
39%
59%
Littleknowledge
Almost noknowledge
3%
None at all1%
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
6/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
6
61TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: EXTENT OF KNOWLEDGE OF THE PNOY ADMINS
ANTI-CORRUPTION EFFORTS, BY AREA, 2012
Base: Those who say there is corruption in the public sector
None at allAlmostno knowledge
Extensiveknowledge
Littleknowledge
3525
3138 42 43
47
60
6864
60 56 53 47
44 3
2 2 2 51 2
2
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
62TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES VS. GENERAL PUBLIC: EFFECTIVENESS OF THESTEPS TAKEN BY PNOY ADMIN TO ERADICATE GRAFT AND
CORRUPTION, 2012
Q39. In your opinion, how effective are the steps being taken by the present administration to eradicatecorruption in our country? Are the steps being taken by government?
Base: Those who say there is corruption in the public sector
Enterprises Gen. Public
Very effective
Somewhat effective
Hardlyeffective
Not at all effective
66%19%
3% 13%
Somewhateffective
52%25%
6%16%Very effective
Hardlyeffective
Not at all effective
65TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: EFFECTIVENESS OF THE STEPS TAKEN BY PNOYADMIN TO ERADICATE GRAFT AND CORRUPTION, BY AREA, 2012
Base: Those who say there is corruption in the public sector
Not at allHardlyeffective
Very effective
Somewhateffective
10 10 1319
1116 16
64 6765
67
68 5963
20 21 1910
16 24 18
3 2 2 4 5 3
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
67TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: OPINION ON HOW OFTEN THE GOVT PUNISHES
CORRUPT GOVT OFFICIALS, BYAREA, 2012
Base: Those who say there is corruption in the public sector
Almost never
Seldom
Almost allOften
5 3 5 16 7 6 8
2216
23 21 22
29 31 29
61
63
6669 56
57 52 55
1217
5 815
7 11 8
All Areas NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
68TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
2) SINCERITY IN FIGHTING CORRUPTION
73TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: EXCELLENT SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012
+10
-15
-3
-27
-37
+80
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
Office of thePresident
+10
+30
+50
+70
-10
-30
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
7/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
7
74TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF THEOFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
-37-45
-53
-16-21
-49
+80+83
+70
+81 +81+76
+87+78
ANG ILO DAVAll areas NCR CLB CEB CDO-I
75TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: VERY GOOD SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
Dept. of Health Dept. of Tradeand Industry
+10
+30
+50
+70
-10
Dept. ofEducation
+40
+11
+26
+3
+32
+54
+10
+30
+42
+7
+37 +38
0
+61 +60
+51
76TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF DOH,BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
ANG ILO DAVAll areas NCR CLB CEB CDO-I
+37 +38 +37+41
+33
+52
+61 +60
+77
+65
+52+57 +59 +55
77TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF THE DTI,BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
ANG ILO DAVAll areas NCR CLB CEB CDO-I
+38
+30 +28
+39
+45
+57+59 +57 +56
+65
+58 +60 +56
+64
78TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF DEPED,BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
ANG ILO DAVAll areas NCR CLB CEB CDO-I
0
-1
-21
9
0
9
+51+62 +60
+50
+32
+47
+40 +40
79TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: GOOD SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
+10
+30
+50
-10
-30
+22
-13-17
+5
-17
-32
+9
-7
-18
+4
-6
-23
-8
-1
-25
+39+36
+30
Senate
Office of theOmbudsman
Dept. of Interior &Local Government
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
8/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
8
80TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF THEOFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
ANG ILO DAVAll areas NCR CLB CEB CDO-I
-8
-33
-15
+22 +21
-15
+39
+45
+27 +29+32
+42
+35
+46
81TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF THE SENATE,BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
ANG ILO DAVAll areas NCR CLB CEB CDO-I
-1
-8
0
+14
-3 -4
+36
+28
+44 +46
+29 +30
+41
+53
82TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF DILG,BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
ANG ILO DAVAll areas NCR CLB CEB CDO-I
-25
-38-47
-10 -10-6
+30+36
+16+23
+31+25
+28
+36
83TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: MODERATE SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012 (1/2)
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
+10
+30
+50
-10
-30
+19
+48
+24
+13
+40
0
+14
+45
+5+5
+37
-7
+8
+40
-17
+27+24 +23
Sandiganbayan Supreme Court
Dept. of Budget &Management
84TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: MODERATE SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012 (2/2)
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
+10
+30
+50
-10
-30
Your City/Municipal
govt
Dept. of Trans &Comm.+27
+22
-22
+26
-13
+35
-27
+35
-30
+21
+10
85TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF THESANDIGANBAYAN, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
ANG ILO DAVAll areas NCR CLB CEB CDO-I
+8
-2
+0
+20 +21
+8
+27
+23
+29 +28
+17
+35+33 +32
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
9/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
9
86TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF THESUPREME COURT, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
ANG ILO DAVAll areas NCR CLB CEB CDO-I
+40
+46
+29
+42 +42
+31
+24 +25
+16 +17
+23
+31
+17
+39
87TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF DBM,BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
ANG ILO DAVAll areas NCR CLB CEB CDO-I
-17 -16
-41
-10-7
-17
+23
+33
+10+6
+33
+16
+20
+17
88TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OFYOUR CITY GOVERNMENT, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
ANG ILO DAVAll areas NCR CLB CEB CDO-I
+35
+22+19
+51
+65
+21+21
0
+55
+31 +33+34
+66
-13
89TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF DOTC,BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
ANG ILO DAVAll areas NCR CLB CEB CDO-I
-30
-38
-47
-25
-9
-24
+10+15
0
+17
+1+7 +7
+12
90TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: NEUTRAL SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
-44
-28
-39 -40
-23
-32
-25
-41
-34 -34
+1
-6
+10
-10
-30
-50
Dept. ofEnvt&
Nat. Resources
House of
Representatives
91TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF DENR,BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
ANG ILO DAVAll areas NCR CLB CEB CDO-I
-34
-42-45
-24 -23-27
+1
-4
+18 +16
+10+7
-17 -15
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
10/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
10
92TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF THEHOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
ANG ILO DAVAll areas NCR CLB CEB CDO-I
-34
-50
-36
-5
-36
-25
-6
-22
+6
+14
-12
0 +3
+16
93TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: POOR SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012 (1/2)
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
-59-59 -58
-36
-49
-27
-56
-8
-57
-13-20
-10
-30
-50
-70
Commissionon Elections
Bureau ofInternalRevenue
-42
-36
-23
-18-17
-12
PhilippineNationalPolice
94TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: POOR SINCERITY RATINGS IN 2012 (1/2)
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
-66
-45
-66
-38
-55
-31
-63
-32
-65
-39
-21 -26
-10
-30
-50
-70
LandTransportation
Office
Dept. ofPublic Works &
Highways
95TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF THE PNP,BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
ANG ILO DAVAll areas NCR CLB CEB CDO-I
-17
-28
-23
-16
-5
+1
-12
-31
-19
-4 -5
+3
+18
+5
96TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF THECOMELEC, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
ANG ILO DAVAll areas NCR CLB CEB CDO-I
-8
-4
-16
-2
-16
-11
-13-12
-24
-18
-1-2
-11
-24
97TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF BIR,BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
ANG ILO DAVAll areas NCR CLB CEB CDO-I
-57
-66-60
-46-43
-67
-20-27
-12
0
-19-13
-24-30
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
11/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
11
98TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF DPWH,BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
ANG ILO DAVAll areas NCR CLB CEB CDO-I
-65-71 -71 -70
-56-52
-21
-8
-30
-20
-32-36
-24-30
99TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF LTO,BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
ANG ILO DAVAll areas NCR CLB CEB CDO-I
-39 -40
-55
-37
-24
-48
-26-30
-35
-7
-15
-29-26
-29
100TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: BAD SINCERITY RATING IN 2012
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2012
-75 -74
-68-72
-69
-46
0
-10
-30
-50
-70
Bureau of Customs
101TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SINCERITY RATING OF THE BOC,BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
ANG ILO DAVAll areas NCR CLB CEB CDO-I
-69
-75 -76
-64
-30
-72
-46
-55
-42-39
-33
-46 -47-42
111TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
3) GOVERNMENT EFFORTS TO FIGHTCORRUPTION
113TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: THE GOVERNMENT CAN BE RUN WITHOUT
CORRUPTION OR CORRUPTION IS PART OF THE WAY THE
GOVT WORKS, 2000 TO 2012
The govt canbe runwithoutcorruption
Corruption
is part ofthe waygovt works
55 57 5660 60 56
49 4450
59
43 42 4440 40 43
50 5650
41
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
12/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
12
116TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: THE GOVERNMENT CAN BE RUN WITHOUT
CORRUPTION OR CORRUPTION IS PART OF THE WAY THE
GOVT WORKS, BYAREA, 2012
The govt canbe runwithoutcorruption
Corruptionis part ofthe waygovt works
6152
68 64
4756 59
3948
32 36
52
44 40
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
117TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES VS GENERAL PUBLIC: THE GOVERNMENT CAN
BE RUN WITHOUT CORRUPTION OR CORRUPTION IS PART OF
THE WAY THE GOVT WORKS, 2012
Enterprises Gen. Public
33%
65%59%
41%
The govt can be runwithout corruption
Corruption is part of theway govt works
The govt can be runwithout corruption
Corruption is part of theway govt works
122TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES ON IT IS NOW EASIER FOR ANYONE WHO WANTSTO BID ON A GOVERNMENT CONTRACT TO GET INFORMATION
ABOUT THE BIDDING, 2007 TO 2012
*NET Agreement: % Agree minus % Disagree.
54 57 53 60
21 16 19 2223 26 26 16
'07*** '08** '09*** '12****
Agree
Undecided
Disagree
127TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: WHERE WOULD YOUR COMPANY GETINFORMATION ABOUT BIDDING FOR GOVT CONTRACTS,
2012
4841
272020
12
Newspapers
Internet
Inside information/tip
TelevisionWord of mouth
from family/friendsRadio
128TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: WHERE WOULD YOUR COMPANY GETINFORMATION ABOUT BIDDING FOR GOVT CONTRACTS,
BY AREA, 2012
Newspaper Internet Inside info. Television RadioWord of mouth
48
41
36
45
51
64
4845
52
3538
34
44
36
23
15
24
3437
39
26
9
3734
21
12
22
1716 15
23
29
2321
19
6
18
9
19
13 14 14
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
129TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
4) PROSECUTION OF HIGH-PROFILECORRUPTION CASES
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
13/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
13
130TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: OPINION ON THE CURRENT PACE OF THE TRIALOF SELECTED CORRUPTION CASES IN GOVT, 2012
Might notsucceed, doneTOO QUICKLY
Carefullymoving at
RIGHT PACE MUCH TOO SLOW
Graft vs PGMA: NBN-ZTE
Graft vs Ben Abalos: NBN-ZTEGraft vs Mike Arroyo: allegedlyanomalous PNP helicopter sale
Malversation of funds vsex-PAGCOR Chair Genuino:
Donated rice
Plunder vs Maj. Gen. Garcia
Perjury and Falsification ofPublic Docs vs V. Garcillano:
Hello Garci
17
15
12
8
8
6
29
29
21
25
11
22
56
56
66
6654
81
71
132TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: THE ON-GOING TRIALS OF SOME CORRUPTIONCASES ARE CONDUCTED FAIRLY OR UNFAIRLY, 2012
FAIRNEITHER FAIRNOR UNFAIR UNFAIR
Graft vs PGMA: NBN-ZTE
Graft vs Ben Abalos: NBN-ZTE
Graft vs Mike Arroyo: allegedlyanomalous PNP helicopter sale
Plunder vs Maj. Gen. Garcia
Perjury and Falsification ofPublic Docs vs V. Garcillano:
Hello Garci
76
71
71
67
68
67
18
22
23
25
25
24
5
6
6
7
5
10
Malversation of funds vsex-PAGCOR Chair Genuino:
Donated rice
140TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
5) ENTEPRISES SOLICITED FOR BRIBE
141TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR BRIBE, 2012
Getting localgovt permits/licensesAssessment/payment of income taxes
Getting nationalgovt permits/ licensesComplying with import regulations incl. payment ofimport duties
Supplying govt with goods/ services
Collecting receivables from govt
Availing of govt incentives
Any of seven listedbribes80
31
27
19
17
14
13
5
142TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FORANY OF SEVEN LISTED BRIBES, 2005 TO 2012
6861
57 6171
6050
'03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****143
TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISESON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE:GETTING LOCAL GOVT PERMITS/LICENSES, 2000 TO 2012
55 54
50
41
3633
40
49
3231
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
14/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
14
144TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: ASSESSMENT/PAYMENTOF INCOME TAXES, 2000 TO 2012
5250
43
39
30 29
33
46
40
27
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
145TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: GETTING NATIONALGOVT PERMITS/ LICENSES, 2000 TO 2012
42
3437
28 2829
37
47
32
19
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
146TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE: COMPLYING WITHIMPORT REGULATIONS INCL. PAYMENT OF IMPORT DUTIES, 2000
TO 2012
17
10
1813
21 2225
3127
17
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
147TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE:SUPPLYING GOVT WITH GOODS/ SERVICES, 2000 TO 2012
15 1418
15 1618
22
29
22
14
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
148TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE:COLLECTING RECEIVABLES FROM GOVT, 2000 TO 2012
9 8
1311
1816
2024
20
13
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
149TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE:AVAILING OF GOVT INCENTIVES, 2000 TO 2012
64
10
5
10 1113
22
14
5
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
15/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
15
153TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR ANY OF SEVEN LISTED BRIBES,BY AREA, 2012
58
3631
4756
47 50
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I155
TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISESON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE:GETTING LOCAL GOVTPERMITS/LICENSES, BY AREA, 2000 TO 2012
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
5554
50
46
32
26
45
12
33
39
21
42
20
24
33
19
48
24
37 37
24
60
22
46
2928
39
19
42
2325
37
23
3229
26
ANG ILONCR CLB CEB DAV CDO-I
157TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE:ASSESSMENT/PAYMENT OF INCOME TAXES, BY AREA, 2000 TO 2012
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
ANG ILONCR CLB CEB DAV CDO-I
5250
4342
38
23
36
19
2224
37
33
20
24
29
23
34
24
36
32
35
55
18
41
32
28
50
25
37
32
43
33
13
28
22
30
159TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE:GETTINGNATIONAL GOVT PERMITS/ LICENSES, BY AREA, 2000 TO 2012
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
ANG ILONCR CLB CEB DAV CDO-I
42
34
37
32
25
9
33
11
23
30
25
36
21 22
27
22
43
33
39
30
21
59
14
42
27
19
39
20
40
22
2523
14
20 20
16
161TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE:COMPLYING WITH IMPORTREGULATIONS INCL. PAYMENT OF IMPORT DUTIES,
BY AREA, 2000 TO 2012'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
ANG ILONCR CLB CEB DAV CDO-I
17
10
18
1416
2
25
12
24
19
12
28
13
23
16
7
31
17
25
18
13
41
18
27
1412
40
19
30
14
17
20
9
28
10 9
163TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE:SUPPLYING GOVT WITH GOODS/ SERVICES,
BY AREA, 2000 TO 2012
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
ANG ILONCR CLB CEB DAV CDO-I
1514
18
13
18 18
15
3
17
29
1918
8
13
28
18
22
18
24 24 23
32
6
25
28
11
21
13
30
17
27
15
5
1821
18
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
16/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
16
165TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE:COLLECTING RECEIVABLES FROM GOVT,
BY AREA, 2000 TO 2012
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
ANG ILONCR CLB CEB DAV CDO-I
9 8
13
1012 13
18
7
15
26
23
15
1113
28
15
19
16
19
30
20
27
10
21 20
16
22
16
22
13
27
14
6
1114
22
167TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SOLICITED FOR A BRIBE:AVAILING OF GOVT INCENTIVES,
BY AREA, 2000 TO 2012'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
ANG ILONCR CLB CEB DAV CDO-I
64
10
46
2
9
3
9
17
111113
911
9
13
17
14 14
9
25
5
21
15
2
14
9
18
10
19
5
2
8 79
169TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: REPORTING OF BRIBE-SOLICITATION,2005 TO 2012
Base: Those Who Were Solicited for a Bribe
8 7 1114 9 9
92 93 8986 91 91
'05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
Reportedbribe-solicitation
Did not reportbribe-solicitation
170TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: REPORTING OF BRIBE-SOLICITATION,BY AREA, 2012
Base: Those Who Were Solicited for a Bribe
Reportedbribe-solicitation
Did notreportbribe-solicitation
814 16
6 511 6
9286 84
94 9589 94
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
173TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: REASONS FOR NOT REPORTINGBRIBE-SOLICITATION, 2012
Base: Those Who Were Solicited for a Bribe But Did Not Report It, 91%
Nothing would be done
anywayCannot prove anything
Afraid of reprisal
Too small a thing to botherDo not know how/whom to
reportIts a standard practice not
to report
4539
342625
2120
136
Will spend muchDont want to betray anyone
It is embarrassing174
TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISESON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: REASONS FOR NOT REPORTINGBRIBE-SOLICITATION, 2005 TO 2012
Q73. IF DID NOT REPORT: Why did you not report this? (ENCIRCLE ALL THAT APPLY)
Nothing would be done anyway 60% 69% 69% 79% 75% 45%Cannot prove anything 46 50 45 61 50 39
Afraid of reprisal 43 54 49 55 51 34
It is too small a thing to bother 38 44 47 52 48 26
Do not know how or whom to report 28 34 35 40 44 25
It is standard practice anywaynot to report the incident 43 52 48 57 46 21
Will spend much 32 44 45 59 50 20
Do not want to betray anyone 17 29 27 29 32 13
It is embarrassing 12 19 18 24 23 6
05 06 07 08 09 12
Base: Those Who Were Solicited for a Bribe But Did Not Report It
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
17/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
17
182TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: PART OF THE COMPANY THAT IS MOSTVULNERABLE TO BRIBERY, 2012
Q44. In your sector of business, which part of a company is most vulnerable to bribery? Please rank youranswers from the MOST VULNERABLE (1).
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Private Sector
Rank 1 Rank 6
(Most vulnerable) (Least vulnerable)
50
19
12
10
5
1
15
24
6
18
25
4
10
21
8
18
19
8
7
12
8
20
16
11
5
7
11
12
9
28
5
3
30
3
7
22
Procurement
Sales & marketing
Top management
Finance
Logistics
Human resource mgt
184TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: PART OF THE COMPANY THAT IS MOSTVULNERABLE (% RANK 1) TO BRIBERY, BY AREA, 2012
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Private Sector
Procurement Sales &marketing
Top mngt. Finance HR mngtLogistics
64
3229
42
54 53
32
16 17
3026
15
21 22
8
20
13
18 18
2
20
5
1720
3
9
14 13
2
10
15 4
730.3 1
3 24
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
186TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SECTORS THAT ARE MOST VULNERABLE TOCORRUPTION, 2012
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Private Sector
6053
4227
2521
1713
998
3
Construction
Mining & quarrying
Government services
Forestry
Transportation/communications/storage
Trade
Finance
Ownership of dwellings & real estate
Electricity, gas, & water
ManufacturingAgriculture and fishery
Other private services
188TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
6) TRANSACTIONS WITH GOVERNMENT
190TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: TRANSPARENCY OF TRANSACTIONPROCEDURES OF THE CITY/MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT OFFICES,
2009 AND 2012
16 15
58 58
22 23
5
2
'09*** '12****
DefinitelyTransparent
SomewhatNot Transparent
SomewhatTransparent
Definitely
Not Transparent
194TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: WHETHER THE PROCESS OF BUSINESSPERMITS/LICENSES RENEWALS IS EASIER OR HARDER NOW
THAN 3 YEARS AGO, 2009 AND 2012
Much easier now
Not changed
Somewhat easier now
Somewhat harder now
19 18
38 37
28 32
11 9
4 3
'09*** '12****
Much harder
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
18/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
18
198TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: THE COMPANYS EXPERIENCE IN USING AN
INTERMEDIARY IN ITS RENEWAL OF BUSINESSPERMITS/LICENCES, 2009 AND 2012
Always used
Uses only now
Never used
Used before not now
Uses from time to time
58 64
108
25 20
1 26 6
'09*** '12****
202TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: WILLINGNESS TO PAY TWICE AS MUCH TODOUBLE THE VALIDITY PERIODS OF GOVT ISSUED
LICENSES/PERMITS, 2012
Q62. How willing are you to pay twice as much to double the validity periods of government issuedlicenses/permits?
Very much
willing
Somewhat willing
Not much willing
Not willing at all
40%
23%
16%
21%
204TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: WILLINGNESS TO PAY TWICE AS MUCH TODOUBLE THE VALIDITY PERIODS OF GOVT ISSUED
LICENSES/PERMITS, BY AREA, 2012
Very willing
Somewhatwilling
Not muchwilling
Not willingat all
49
21 23
4452
34 34
20
28 24
2620
2721
13
29
18
15 12
17
14
18 22
35
15 15 22
29
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
205TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: INTERNET-BASED GOVERNMENTTRANSACTIONS THE COMPANY HAS DONE, 2012
56
55
53
48
31
26
SSS: Online paymentBIR: eFPS (Electronic
Filing & Payment System)BIR: Online
Registration System
PHILHEALTHonline services
PhilGEPS: Get info onbidding opportunities
BOC: E2M (electronic tomobile) Customs
Automated Process
210TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: HAVE YOU EVER SUBMITTED A BID FOR AGOVERNMENT CONTRACT? BY AREA, 2012
Submittedbid
Have notsubmittedbid
3238
16 17
3136 36
30
6861
84 83
69 63 63 70
All Areas NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
211TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
7) PRIVATE SECTOR CORRUPTION
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
19/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
19
213TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: EXTENT OF CORRUPTION IN THEPRIVATE SECTOR, 2000 TO 2012
A lot
Some
A little
None
14 9 13 9 10 9 8 8 9 11
3944
43
34 37 34 34 35 3637
43 44 41
49 48 53 53 52 48 45
4 3 3 8 55 5 5 7 7
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
216TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SAYING THERE IS A LOT OF CORRUPTION IN
THE PRIVATE SECTOR, BY AREA, 2000 TO 2012
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
14
9
13
10
12
4
11
13
9
8
4
8
13
9
8
11
7
12
10
7
1
9
7 7
8
9
7
14
5
12
8
1312
10
NCR CLB CEB DAV CDO-IANG ILO
7
12
219TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES VS. GEN. PUBLIC: EXTENT OF CORRUPTION INTHE PRIVATE SECTOR, 2012
None
A lot
Some
A little
None A lot
SomeA little
Enterprises Gen. Public
45% 37%11%7%
37%
38%7%
16%
221TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: NUMBER OF COMPANIES IN THE SAME LINE OFBUSINESS THAT GIVE BRIBES TO WIN PRIVATE SECTOR
CONTRACTS, 2000 TO 2012Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Private Sector
6 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 4 555
18 23 25 20 21 16 17 17 19 22
4748 46
46 4645 46 45 47
43
2017 16
18 1620 20 19 16
19
8 77
10 11 14 12 13 1210
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
Almost all
Most
Few
Hardly any
None
223TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES SAYING MOST/ALMOST ALL COMPANIES IN
MY LINE OF BUSINESS GIVE BRIBES TO WIN PRIVATE SECTORCONTRACTS, BYAREA, 2000 TO 2012
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Public Sector
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
NCR CLB CEB DAV CDO-IANG ILO
38
28
24
2830
26
30
2123
29
25
29
38
18
33
2122
26
18
39
18
27
2222
27
18
2224
29
23
2022
31
22
29
35
225TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: MEDIAN PERCENTAGE OF CONTRACTS ALLOTEDAS A BRIBE FOR A PRIVATE BUSINESS CONTRACT, 2000 TO 2012
Q43. In instances when bribery happens, what percentage of an average contract is allotted for bribes towin private business contracts?
2000* 10%2001* 15
2002/03* 10
2003/04** 10
2005*** 10
2006*** 10
2007*** 10
2008** 10
2009*** 10
2012**** 10
Base: Total Who Say Companies in Their Sector Allot Percentage of Contract for Bribes to
Win Private Sector Corruption
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
20/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
20
227TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
8) BUSINESS EFFORTS TO FIGHT
CORRUPTION
229TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES ON: A PERSON LIKE MECANNOT DO ANYTHINGTO REDUCE CORRUPTION IN THE GOVERNMENT, 2007 TO 2012
NET Disagreement computed as % Disagree minus % Agree.
Agree
Undecided
Disagree
29 33 33 274 6 5 6
67 61 61 67
'07*** '08** '09*** '12****
230TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES ON: A PERSON LIKE MECANNOT DO ANYTHINGTO REDUCE CORRUPTION IN THE GOVERNMENT, BYAREA,
2012
NET Disagreement computed as % Disagree minus % Agree.
Agree
Undecided
Disagree
20 26
25
26
32 31
453
146 3
107
4
76
6069 71
58 6251
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
233TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: EXPECTED CHANGE IN NET INCOME, IFCORRUPTION IS REDUCED TO THAT OF SINGAPORE,
2001 TO 2012
Positivechange
No change
Negativechange
Not aware
5360 60 57 56 52 50 51 52
32
31 2927 30 37 41 37 33
1
2 35 5
4 3 54
137 8 11 8 7 5 7 10
'01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
239TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: CONTRIBUTION TO PAY TO FUND A PROGRAMTHAT WOULD HALVE PUBLIC-SECTOR CORRUPTION IN 10
YEARS, 2000-2012
% willing tocontribute
2000* 61 3%
2001* 70 5
2002/03* 74 5
2003/04** 71 5
2005*** 77 5
2006*** 72 5
2007*** 65 5
2008** 72 5
2009*** 71 5
2012**** 67 5
Among willing to contribute:median % of net income willingto contribute
243TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SPENDING IN THE LAST 2 YEARS TO COMBATFRAUD AND CORRUPTION IN OWN COMPANY, 2007 TO 2012
1 million ++500,000 - 999,000
200,000 - 499,000100,000 - 199,000
61 61 59 57
9 11 12 12
10 9 11 12
6 5 6 44 6 3 43
33 2
6 5 5 7
2007*** 2008** 2009*** 2012****
Nothing
< 10,000
10,000 - 99,000
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
21/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
21
249TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: THECOMPANYSCONTRIBUTION TO ANYPRIVATE ANTI-CORRUPTION PROGRAM IN THE
LAST 2 YEARS, 2007 TO 2012
Nothing
< 10,000
80 78 81 76
7 10 610
5 4 5 52 2 2 21 1 1 10.3
2 0.4 112 2 1
2007*** 2008** 2009*** 2012****
1 million ++500,000 - 999,000200,000 - 499,000100,000 - 199,000
253TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: WAYS FOR BUSINESSES TO REDUCECORRUPTION, 2008 TO 2012
Usehonest
businesspractices
Neverpay
bribes
Know thelaws/rules
ofgovttransact.
Join ananti-
corruption CSO
Reportcorruption
to massmedia
Campaignvs corrupt
politicalcandidates
2009 2012200884
78
65
2215 15
11
7976
62
26
1522
10
82 81
61
19 17 1713
Report govtcorruption
to theOmbudsman
259TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: EFFECTIVENESS OF SOME SUGGESTIONS TOREDUCE CORRUPTION IN GOVERNMENT, 2012
Somewhat Not effectiveVery effective effective at all
83
82
77
73
67
54
52
38
27
16
14
21
23
27
32
39
48
49
2
3
3
4
5
14
9
14
24
Impose stiffer penalties: corrupt govtpeople
Show prominent corrupt persons areput in prison
More transparent govt biddingImpose stiffer penalties: people who
bribeBroadcast/publish where to report
corruptionMonitor closely election expenses of
candidatesRequire fewer signatures on papersSubstantially increase govt salaries
Privatize govt corporations
263TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: FREQUENCY OF PUNISHINGCORRUPT EXECUTIVES IN OWN SECTOR OF BUSINESS,
2003/04 TO 2012
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Private Sector
Almost always
Often
Seldom
Almost never
29 31 34
27 30 25 33
2022
2021
2220
27
37 2823
2927
29
30
13 14 11 12 11 13
9
'03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
267TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: WILLINGNESS TO CONTRIBUTE TO ANEMPOWERMENT FUND, BY AREA, 2012
Q127. The government is setting up an Empowerment Fund to support civil society organizations (CSOs) in organizingcitizens and communities to engage with government in the implementation and monitoring of government, participate inplanning and the budget process of government. It is expected that Empowerment Fund initiative will help in reducingcorruption and enhancing transparency of government transactions. The government plans to tap private sectors, donoragencies, and even CSOs to contribute and provide counterpart funds to the Empowerment Program. How much is yourcompany willing to contribute to the Empowerment Fund?
Willing to contribute 27% 28% 13% 29% 28% 27% 38% 23%
Not willingto contribute 48 48 69 47 49 44 29 46
Dont know etc. 19 16 15 17 19 22 25 21
7 areas NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
279TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
9) HONEST BUSINESS PRACTICES
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
22/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
22
281TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: NUMBER OF COMPANIES IN THE LINE OFBUSINESS THAT DEMAND/ISSUE DEMAND RECEIPTS, KEEP ONE
SET OF ACCOUNTS, AND PAY TAXES HONESTLY, 2012Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Private Sector
Demand receiptsfor all payments
for expenses
Issue receipts forall revenues
Keep only oneset of accounts/
books
Pay taxeshonestly
4531
20 21
44
47
42 41
1021
32 29
1 15 6
0.1 0.3 1 2
Almost all
Most
Few
Hardly any
None
282TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: ALMOST ALL/MOST COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OFBUSINESS PAY TAXES HONESTLY, 2003/04 TO 2012
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Private Sector
Almost all
Most
16 19 18 18 18 1720
3938 40 38 40 42
42
'03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
283TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: ALMOST ALL/MOST COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OFBUSINESS PAY TAXES HONESTLY, BY AREA, 2012
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Private Sector
Almost all
Most
16 23 23 20 2327
16
4443 44
4141 39
35
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
290TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: ALMOST ALL/MOST COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OFBUSINESS ISSUE RECEIPTS FOR ALL REVENUES, 2003/04 TO 2012
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Private Sector
Almost all
Most
38 34 36 3437
31 31
47
48 44 4544
45 47
'03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
291TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: ALMOST ALL/MOST COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OFBUSINESS ISSUE RECEIPTS FOR ALL REVENUES, BY AREA, 2012
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Private Sector
Almost all
Most
31 33 3324 25
3830
49
37 39 54 55
42
40
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
297TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: ALMOST ALL/MOST COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OFBUSINESS KEEP ONLY ONE SET OF ACCOUNTS, 2003/04 TO 2012
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Private Sector
Almost all
Most
23 24 24 22 20 19 21
4345 39 39 43
40 401
'03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
23/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
23
298TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: ALMOST ALL/MOST COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OFBUSINESS KEEP ONLY ONE SET OF ACCOUNTS, BY AREA, 2012
Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Private Sector
Almost all
Most
2315
20 1826 24
14
45
36
39 43
4340
25
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
304TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: ALMOST ALL/MOST COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OFBUSINESS DEMAND RECEIPTS FOR ALL PAYMENTS,
2005 TO 2012Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Private Sector
Almost all
Most
50 50 4953
45 45
43 38 3736
42 44
'05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
305TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: ALMOST ALL/MOST COMPANIES IN OWN LINE OFBUSINESS DEMAND RECEIPTS FOR ALL PAYMENTS,
BY AREA, 2012Base: Total Who Say There Is Corruption in the Private Sector
Almost all
Most
51
3744 42 42
5038
44
52 39 4351 35
45
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
310TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
10) THE BUSINESS CLIMATE
312TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SATISFACTION WITH THE NATIONALGOVERNMENT IN PROMOTING A GOOD BUSINESS CLIMATE,
2007 TO 2012
53
3543
69
20
1819
1827
4738
12
'07*** '08** '09*** '12****
Satisfied
Undecided
Dissatisfied
313TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: PERCENT SATISFIED WITH THENATIONAL GOVERNMENT IN PROMOTING A GOOD BUSINESS
CLIMATE, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
30
44
53 54
47
69
58
7378
7469 68
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
24/25G 2012 (23Octrev).pptx/23-Oct-12 /LABUCAY
24
317TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: SATISFACTION WITH YOUR CITY GOVERNMENTIN PROMOTING A GOOD BUSINESS CLIMATE, 2007 TO 2012
Satisfied
Undecided
Dissatisfied
64 64 63 64
16 15 16 1719 20 21 19
'07*** '08** '09*** '12****
318TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: PERCENT SATISFIED WITH THECITY GOVERNMENT IN PROMOTING A GOOD BUSINESS CLIMATE,
BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
54
61
77 76
5255
67 6973
76
87
44
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
322TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: BUSINESS EXPECTATIONS IN THENEXT 2 YEARS, 2000 TO 2012
1 1 3 3 6 59 6 9
1616
30 26 25
40 41
52
33
46
58
36
4442 40
40 40
32
43
37
24
34
2123
21
11 105
135
313
3 66
3 3 2 3 10.1
'00* '01* '02* '03** '05*** '06*** '07*** '08** '09*** '12****
Very Poor
Poor
Fair
Excellent
Good
323TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
ENTERPRISES: PERCENT EXCELLENT/GOOD BUSINESSEXPECTATIONS IN THE NEXT 2 YEARS, BY AREA, 2009 AND 2012
2009 2012
49
67 65
53 51
72
80
68 6672
8176
NCR ANG CLB ILO CEB DAV CDO-I
332TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
www.sws.org.ph
#52 Malingap Street,Sikatuna Village, Quezon CityTels: 926-4308, 924-4456, 924-4458, 924-4465
E-mail: sws_info@sws.org.ph
333TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
www.sws.org.ph
Education
Conscientization
Analysis
7/30/2019 TAG:2012 SWS Surveys on Corruption
25/25
25
334TAG 2012: SURVEYS OF ENTERPRISES
ON CORRUPTION
www.sws.org.ph
Quot homines tot sententiae