Survival Skills Workshop UWA 8 September 2015 Presented by Professor Marian Simms ARC Executive...

Survival Skills WorkshopUWA

8 September 2015

Presented byProfessor Marian SimmsARC Executive Director

Survival Skills—Overview

Web: arc.gov.au I Email: Communications@arc.gov.au

1. DECRA Scheme Updates

2. Early career and DECRA data

3. Discovery Schemes data

4. Assessment and selection processes

5. Questions? Discussion

Changes to align statement with selection criteria:

The Administering Organisation must provide a statement in relation to the Research Environment within the Proposal which:

a. indicates that this area is a core or emerging research strength and describes the level of resources to be provided to support the successful DECRA candidate (for example, project costs, PhD students, or salary top-up)

b. details opportunities for the DECRA Candidate to demonstrate the level of independence required to be competitive for research and/or research and teaching pathways at the Administering Organisation during and after the Project

c. is signed by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research) or equivalent (D.5.1)

• A process has been introduced for recognition of research experience equivalent to having been awarded a PhD and timing of PhD outside eligible period

• Note that DECRA Candidates who do not have a PhD or are outside the timing requirements must submit an Eligibility Exemption Request. The ARC will determine whether an Eligibility Exemption is to be granted (D7.3 and D7.4)

Eligibility Exemption Request

Carer’s responsibility: New FAQ (1)

“Carer's responsibility for a child and maternity or partner/parental leave can have an effect on a person's research opportunity and performance evidence above and beyond any actual time taken as leave. In recognition of this, under subsection D7.4.4 of the Funding Rules, the ARC will allow a DECRA Candidate in the DE16 round to claim an Eligibility Exemption of two years per dependent child (inclusive of carer's responsibility and any maternity or partner/parental leave), up to a maximum of four years.” (Without providing justification)

Carer’s responsibility: New FAQ (2)

“A person who has taken more than two years off to care for a dependent child, or who otherwise believes they are entitled to a greater than two year extension, would need to justify their claim when submitting an eligibility exemption request. FAQ 1.25 above does not cap career interruptions for carers of dependent children to two years per child. It does however allow carers of dependent children to claim up to a two year career interruption without justification.”

DECRA commitments

• The DECRA Recipient is expected to spend a minimum of 20% of her/his time on activities at the Administering Organisation, and 80% of her/his time on research activities related to the proposed DECRA(D7.2.2 and D7.2.3)

• The DECRA Recipient may not engage in other professional employment for the duration of the DECRA without prior approval from the ARC under subsection D7.2.6 (D7.2.4)

• The DECRA Recipient may spend up to 0.2 (20 per cent of Full Time Equivalent (FTE)) of her/his time annually on teaching activities. The DECRA will not be extended to accommodate any periods of teaching. Supervision of honours or postgraduate students is not included in this limit (D7.2.9)

Number of ECR researchers on proposals received (DP and DECRA)

Proportion of ECR researchers on proposals received (DP and DECRA)

Gender—DE2015

Panel Number of female

candidates

Number of approved

female candidates

Female success

Number of male

candidates

Number of approved

male candidates

Male success

BSB 149 18 12% 168 27 16%EMI 54 9 17% 333 46 14%HCA 92 16 17% 83 9 11%PCE 64 10 16% 175 24 14%SBE 136 20 15% 133 18 14% Total 495 73 15% 892 124 14%

Citizenship and residency—DE2015

Citizenship/residency status

Proposals considered

% of proposals considered

Proposals approved

Success rate

Foreign Nationals 466 33.4% 83 17.8%

Resident Australians 863 61.9% 106 12.3%

Returning Australians 65 4.7% 11 16.9%

Total 1394 100.0% 200 14.3%

Years since PhD—DE2015

Years since award of PhD

No. of considered proposals

% of considered proposals

No. of approved proposals

% of approved proposals

0-1 157 11.30% 19 9.50%1-2 158 11.30% 18 9.00%2-3 235 16.90% 26 13.00%3-4 287 20.60% 48 24.00%4-5 406 29.10% 66 33.00%5-6 106 7.60% 21 10.50%6-7 27 1.90% 1 0.50%7-8 16 1.10% 0 0.00%8-9 2 0.10% 1 0.50%

Total 1394 200

Average age of Project Leaders in DP grants (DECRA 2012–2014)

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 20160

First-time awardees by scheme 2008–14

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20150

# DECRA first-timers

# DP first-timers

% first-timers

DP—Success and return rates

DECRA—Success rates

Future Fellowships—Success rate

DECRA 2015 Dot-plot

7006005004003002001000

Normalised Rank

DECRA 2015Network = Go8

Panel variable: discipline

NCGP Lifecycle

• Arial 28pt—black

• Note that font sizes can be altered to fit requirements

ARC NCGP funding by scheme 2006–2014

National Competitive Grants ProgrammeDiscovery Programmes Linkage Programmes

Area of box represents $$ awarded over the period 2009–2014. N.B. - Centres of Excellence, SRIs, not awarded in every year. - ITRP and DECRA only funding since 2012

Assessment Process

• ARC staff and Executive Directors assess eligibility etc., but do not decide which proposals should be funded

• All proposals are assessed against the selection criteria, and in accordance with the weightings for that scheme

• Proposals are generally assigned to two College of Experts members by EDs and at least two external assessors by the College

• College of Experts meets to moderate judgments and to make final recommendations about fundable proposals and budgets

• Under the ARC Act all recommendations are just that, and must be approved by the Minister

“Research Opportunity is designed to provide assessors with an accurate appreciation of career history against a timeline of years since graduation from highest educational qualification. Assessors will recognise research opportunities and experience in the context of employment situations including those outside academia and the research component of employment conditions. Periods of unemployment, or any career interruptions for child birth, carers’ responsibilities, misadventure, or debilitating illness will be taken into account. Access to research mentoring and other research support facilities and any other relevant aspects of career experience or opportunities for research will complete the considerations.”

ARC College of Experts

• plays a key role in identifying research excellence, moderating external assessments and recommending fundable proposals.

• assists the ARC in recruiting and assigning assessors and in implementing peer review reforms in established and emerging disciplines as well as interdisciplinary areas.

• experts of international standing drawn from the Australian research community: from higher education, industry and public sector research organisations

• ARC College nominations are approved by the ARC CEO for appointments of one to three years.

FoR Network mapping…All disciplines

01 MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES02 PHYSICAL SCIENCES03 CHEMICAL SCIENCES

04 EARTH SCIENCES05 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES06 BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES07 AGRICULTURAL AND VETERINARY SCIENCES08 INFORMATION AND COMPUTING SCIENCES

09 ENGINEERING10 TECHNOLOGY11 MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES 12 BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND DESIGN13 EDUCATION14 ECONOMICS15 COMMERCE, MANAGEMENT, TOURISM AND SERVICES16 STUDIES IN HUMAN SOCIETY17 PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES18 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES19 STUDIES IN CREATIVE ARTS AND WRITING20 LANGUAGE, COMMUNICATION AND CULTURE21 HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY22 PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES

What are assessors seeking in a DECRA application?

• Compelling Project Description• Sound Methodology• Strong performance evidence, highly

appropriate to the Project• Increasingly a robust Budget Justification

ARC Assignment Information

• The ARC has completely redesigned the way that potential assessors are matched to a proposal for assessment purposes

• Multiple areas of the proposal are mined for a set of keywords and presented to the person completing the assignments as a word cloud

ARC Assignment Information

• This information is then matched to information stored against a potential assessor’s profile and presented in a similar word cloud

• The most appropriate person is then selected and assigned to the proposal to assess

Thank You

Survival Skills Workshop UWA 8 September 2015 Presented by Professor Marian Simms ARC Executive...

Documents

Transcript of Survival Skills Workshop UWA 8 September 2015 Presented by Professor Marian Simms ARC Executive...

ARC Presentation to University of Newcastle 16 July 2015 Professor Marian Simms ARC Executive Director.

ARC Medical Research Policy The Psychology Foundation of Australia 20 February 2015 Professor Marian Simms ARC Executive Director.

UWA LABOR UWA

Professor Marian Simms ARC Executive Director Presentation to UQ Political Science and International Relations November 2014.

The University of Queensland November 2014 Professor Marian Simms Executive Director, Social, Behavioural and Economic Sciences (SBE) Funding Prospects.

Jeremy Simms

Shannon Simms Portfolio 2013

791st Simms

Kitting - SIMMS

SIMMS - Catalogo Footwear 2011

O.E. REF SPACO DESCRIPTION O.E. · PDF filep4512 06034 fuel injection pump simms p51784e 06071 simms inline pump simms p5202-1 06034 fuel injection pump simms r20-11x 06006 steel ring

Commissioner John Simms

reiss simms

02 Nigel Simms

Presentation to Business and Law Research Forum University of Newcastle 17 July 2015 Professor Marian Simms ARC Executive Director.

Prof Marian Simms ARC Executive Director Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research Capacity Building 3 November 2014.

Yvonne Simms Portfolio

SIMMS - Catalogo Waders 2009

ARC Presentation to Federation University 17 April 2015 Professor Marian Simms ARC Executive Director.

ARC Medical Research Policy Presentation to UNSW Business School 25 June 2015 Prof Marian Simms ARC Executive Director.