Post on 28-May-2020
SURGICAL OPTIONS IN FIBROID TREATMENT:
WHEN AND HOW?Andreas Thurkow
AMCAmsterdam University
Medical Centres Bergman Clinics
Amsterdam
www.thurkow.com
DISCLOSURES
• Shares: none relevant to this lecture
• ad hoc consultant for : Olympus, Hologic, Ethicon, Gideon Richter
www.thurkow.com
SURGICAL OPTIONS IN FIBROID TREATMENT:
WHEN AND HOW?Andreas Thurkow
AMCUniversity of Amsterdam
Bergman Clinics Amsterdam
www.thurkow.com
WHAT?
Surgical treatment of fibroids:
• Myomectomy: hysteroscopic, laparoscopic, open
• Hysterectomy
• RF ablation?
www.thurkow.com
WHEN?
• blood loss
• pain, volume symptoms
• impaired fertility
• (no symptoms > no surgery!)
•
www.thurkow.com
ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS
•
• Medical treatment
• Embolisation
• Hysterectomy
www.thurkow.com
Do Nothing
• all asymptomatic myomas!
• imminent menopause?
• innocent disease!
www.thurkow.com
Do Nothing
ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS
• Do Nothing
•
• Embolisation
• Hysterectomy
www.thurkow.com
Medical Treatment
• Progestins
Also as a Pretreatment:
• GnRH agonists -
• SPERMS: Esmya®
but: - softer - cleavage plane may change
www.thurkow.com
Medical Treatment
ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS
• Do nothing
• Medical treatment
•
• Hysterectomy
www.thurkow.com
Embolisation
Embolisation
www.thurkow.com
ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS
• Do nothing
• Medical treatment
• Embolisation
•
www.thurkow.com
Hysterectomy
• effective, high satisfaction rate
• complications < myomectomy (blood loss, adhaesions, infection, recurrence)
• not in case of wish to preserve uterus
www.thurkow.com
Hysterectomy
www.thurkow.com
• effective, high satisfaction rate
• complications < myomectomy (blood loss, adhaesions, infection, recurrence)
• not in case of wish to preserve uterus
Hysterectomy
HOW?
•
• LAPAROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY
• OPEN MYOMECTOMY
HYSTEROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY
www.thurkow.com
HYSTEROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY
www.thurkow.com
www.thurkow.com
submucous fibroid and HMB: preference for hysteroscopic treatment (Guidelines RCOG, NVOG, AAGL)
www.thurkow.com
History:
Dr Robert Neuwirth (1922-2013)
1st hysteroscopic myomectomy urologic resectoscope 1976 (monopolar, 32% dextrane 70)
HYSTEROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY
www.thurkow.com
FIGO Classification of Fibroids
www.thurkow.com
HYSTEROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY
FIGO Classification of Fibroids
www.thurkow.com
HYSTEROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY
Ultrasound!
TCRM STUDY: SUBMUCOUS MYOMAS & HMB
interim analysis
N = 50
www.thurkow.com
BIPOLAR!
NaCl 0,9%:
• better safety profile (RCT Berg ’09)
• no increased gas embolism risk (RCT Dyrbye ’12)
www.thurkow.com
RESECTION TECHNIQUE
USUAL:
• superficial to deep
• over entire width of the fibroid
• somtimes only intracavitary part
www.thurkow.com
ALTERNATIVE TECHNIQUE:hemisection: central incision until pseudo capsulemore incisions if needed
www.thurkow.com
RESECTION TECHNIQUE
Casadio P et al. Fertil Steril. 2011
www.thurkow.com
CONTRACTIONS FACILITATE EXPULSION
www.thurkow.com
MINI RESECTOSCOPE
www.thurkow.com
Giampietro Gubbini
GUBBINI MINI-RESECTOSCOPE
www.thurkow.com
RESECTIONS SLAZ 1995 – 2005
• STUDY
• TCRM 1995-2005
• N = 1232
• Incomplete resection: 19% → 1.5%
www.thurkow.com
completeincomplete
RESECTIONS SLAZ 1995 – 2005
www.thurkow.com
hemisection
bipolar
% INCOMPLETE RESECTIONS SLAZ 1995 – 2005
www.thurkow.com
ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS FOR HYSTEROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY
Bipolar ElectrodesMorcellation
• •
www.thurkow.com
• 5 F electrodes
• cutting / vaporising
• ambulatory treatment
Bipolar Electrodes
www.thurkow.com
Bipolar Electrodes3 cm type 0, fully ambulatory
www.thurkow.com
Bipolar Electrodes3 cm type 0, fully ambulatory
www.thurkow.com
successful, but: 45 min
ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS FOR HYSTEROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY
Bipolar ElectrodesMorcellation
• •
www.thurkow.com
MorcellationHysteroscopic
Inventor & patient holder: Mark Hans Emanuel
www.thurkow.com
www.thurkow.com
www.thurkow.com
HYSTEROSCOPIC MORCELLATOR
• short learning curve (van Dongen e.a.)
• better acceptation by patients
• suitable for ambulatory therapy!
• for fibroids?
HYSTEROSCOPIC
SURGERY
Removeyourfibroidsorthoseinfriends&relatives
yourself!
www.thurkow.com
MORCELLATION VS RESECTION
(Shazly et al. JMIG 2016)www.thurkow.com
www.thurkow.com
MORCELLATION VS RESECTION
(Shazly et al. JMIG 2016)
Hamidouche ‘15: type 2 : 29% in Myosure, 41% in VersapointEmanuel ’05: incl. polyps, exclusion of type 2 fibroids
Vitale et al. 2017: RCT, equivalent for type 0 & 1, less voor type 2
www.thurkow.com
MORCELLATION VS RESECTION
higher costs in morcellation (disposables!)
but with conversion to ambulatory balance could still be favourable!
rapid technological development
MORCELLATION VS RESECTION
www.thurkow.com
HOW?
• HYSTEROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY
• LAPAROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY
• OPEN MYOMECTOMY
www.thurkow.com
OPEN MYOMECTOMY
www.thurkow.com
Only when laparoscopic approach is not possible:
• size (12 cm?)
• multiple fibroids (> 3?)
• lack of expertise
OPEN MYOMECTOMY
www.thurkow.com
• longer recovery time
• longer admission time in hospital
• more pain
• more adhaesions
• more blood loss
but:
• faster, tactile feedback, shorter learning curve
OPEN MYOMECTOMY
www.thurkow.com
Indication for fibroid removal (other than type 0-2): preference for laparoscopic treatment whenever possible (Guideline NVOG)
www.thurkow.com
HOW?
• HYSTEROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY
•
• OPEN MYOMECTOMY
LAPAROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY
www.thurkow.com
LAPAROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY
www.thurkow.com
HISTORY
• Atlee 1840: 1st fibroid enucleation
• Bonney ’46
• Semm ’80: 1st laparoscopic myomectomy
www.thurkow.com
‘Since cure without deformity or loss of function must ever be surgery’s highest ideal, the general proposition that myomectomy is a greater surgical achievement than hysterectomy is incontestable’
• Victor Bonney (1946)
www.thurkow.com
HISTORY
• Atlee 1840: 1st fibroid enucleation
• Bonney ’46
• Semm ’80: 1st laparoscopic myomectomy
www.thurkow.com
HISTORY
• Atlee 1840: 1st fibroid enucleation
• Bonney ’46
• Semm ’80: 1st laparoscopic myomectomy
www.thurkow.com
www.thurkow.com
FIGO Classification of Fibroids
LAPAROSCOPIC MYOMECTOMY
CONTRAINDICATIONS• adenomyosis
• suspicion malignancy
• no wish to preserve uterus
• fibroids > 8 (?) cm
• > 3 fibroids (each > 5 cm)
•www.thurkow.com
COMPLICATIONS %
• blood loss 0 - 11
• fever, infection 0 - 5 ?
• adhaesion formation 25 - 50
• dehiscence in pregnancy 0,5
• adenomyosis 0 - 1
• mortality 0
www.thurkow.com
TECHNIQUE
• see video presentation tips & tricks!
www.thurkow.com
RESULTSsubfertility:
71 - 75% (vs. 40 - 66,7% with laparotomy)
bleeding, pain:
73 - 80%
recurrence risk:
> 20% (cumulative over 10 y: -scopy = -tomy)
www.thurkow.com
PREREQUISITES (PERSONNEL & TRAINING)
• advanced lap. surgery!
• experienced surgeon & team:
• knot tying!
• morcellation
• ergonomy
www.thurkow.com
• electrogenerator, needle or hook
• alternative: ultrasone energy
• laparoscopic tenaculum
• needle holders, suture material (barbed)
• morcellator (in bag)
• adhaesion prevention?
PREREQUISITES (INSTRUMENTATION)
www.thurkow.com
www.thurkow.com
TAKE HOME MESSAGES
• Accurate Preoperative Imaging
• Hysteroscopic>Laparoscopic>Open
• Premed if needed, only for TCRM
• Expertise!
• Concentration of care (volume)
www.thurkow.com
TAKE HOME MESSAGES
THANK YOU!KIITOS!
TA(C)K(K)!
www.thurkow.com