Subsequent Entry Biologic Review Report€¦ · Inflectra (CT-P13; infliximab) is a subsequent...

Post on 08-Apr-2020

3 views 0 download

Transcript of Subsequent Entry Biologic Review Report€¦ · Inflectra (CT-P13; infliximab) is a subsequent...

November2017

Drug Inflectra(infliximab)

Indication• AdultswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveCrohn’sdisease• AdultswithfistulizingCrohn’sdisease• Adultswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis

ListingrequestForeachindication,listinasimilarmannertothepublicplanlistingcriteriaforRemicade

Dosageform(s) Intravenousinfusion(powderforsolution,100mg/vial)

NOCdate June10,2016

Manufacturer Hospira,aPfizerCompany

CommonDrugReviewSubsequentEntryBiologicReviewReport

ThisreviewreportwaspreparedbytheCanadianAgencyforDrugsandTechnologiesinHealth(CADTH).ThroughtheCADTHCommonDrugReview(CDR)process,CADTHundertakesreviewsofdrugsubmissions,resubmissions,andrequestsforadvice,andprovidesformularylistingrecommendationstoallCanadianpubliclyfundedfederal,provincial,andterritorialdrugplans,withtheexceptionofQuebec.Thereportcontainsanevidence-basedclinicaland/orpharmacoeconomicdrugreview,basedonpublishedandunpublishedmaterial,includingmanufacturersubmissions;studiesidentifiedthroughindependent,systematicliteraturesearches;andpatient-groupsubmissions.InaccordancewithCDRUpdate—Issue87,manufacturersmayrequestthatconfidentialinformationberedactedfromtheCDRClinicalandPharmacoeconomicReviewReports.TheinformationinthisreportisintendedtohelpCanadianhealthcaredecision-makers,healthcareprofessionals,healthsystemsleaders,andpolicy-makersmakewell-informeddecisionsandtherebyimprovethequalityofhealthcareservices.Theinformationinthisreportshouldnotbeusedasasubstitutefortheapplicationofclinicaljudgmentwithrespecttothecareofaparticularpatientorotherprofessionaljudgmentinanydecision-makingprocess,norisitintendedtoreplaceprofessionalmedicaladvice.WhileCADTHhastakencareinthepreparationofthisdocumenttoensurethatitscontentsareaccurate,complete,andup-to-dateasofthedateofpublication,CADTHdoesnotmakeanyguaranteetothateffect.CADTHisnotresponsibleforthequality,currency,propriety,accuracy,orreasonablenessofanystatements,information,orconclusionscontainedinthesourcedocumentation.CADTHisnotresponsibleforanyerrorsoromissionsorinjury,loss,ordamagearisingfromorrelatingtotheuse(ormisuse)ofanyinformation,statements,orconclusionscontainedinorimpliedbytheinformationinthisdocumentorinanyofthesourcedocumentation.ThisdocumentisintendedforuseinthecontextoftheCanadianhealthcaresystem.Otherhealthcaresystemsaredifferent;theissuesandinformationrelatedtothesubjectmatterofthisdocumentmaybedifferentinotherjurisdictionsand,ifusedoutsideofCanada,itisattheuser’srisk.Thisdisclaimerandanyquestionsormattersofanynaturearisingfromorrelatingtothecontentoruse(ormisuse)ofthisdocumentwillbegovernedbyandinterpretedinaccordancewiththelawsoftheProvinceofOntarioandthelawsofCanadaapplicabletherein,andallproceedingsshallbesubjecttotheexclusivejurisdictionofthecourtsoftheProvinceofOntario,Canada.CADTHtakessoleresponsibilityforthefinalformandcontentofthisdocument,subjecttothelimitationsnotedabove.ThestatementsandconclusionsinthisdocumentarethoseofCADTHandnotofitsadvisorycommitteesandreviewers.Thestatements,conclusions,andviewsexpressedhereindonotnecessarilyrepresenttheviewsofHealthCanadaoranyCanadianprovincialorterritorialgovernment.ProductionofthisdocumentismadepossiblebyfinancialcontributionsfromHealthCanadaandthegovernmentsofAlberta,BritishColumbia,Manitoba,NewBrunswick,NewfoundlandandLabrador,NorthwestTerritories,NovaScotia,Nunavut,Ontario,PrinceEdwardIsland,Saskatchewan,andYukon.Youarepermittedtomakecopiesofthisdocumentfornon-commercialpurposes,provideditisnotmodifiedwhenreproducedandappropriatecreditisgiventoCADTH.Youmaynototherwisecopy,modify,translate,postonawebsite,storeelectronically,republish,orredistributeanymaterialfromthisdocumentinanyformorbyanymeanswithoutthepriorwrittenpermissionofCADTH.PleasecontactCADTH’sVice-PresidentofCorporateServicesatcorporateservices@cadth.cawithanyinquiriesaboutthisnoticeorotherlegalmattersrelatingtoCADTH’sservices.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

iCommonDrugReview November2017

TABLEOFCONTENTSABBREVIATIONS............................................................................................................................................iiEXECUTIVESUMMARY.................................................................................................................................iv1. PRODUCTINFORMATION....................................................................................................................1

1.1 OverviewoftheSEBProduct.....................................................................................................1 1.2 OverviewoftheReferenceProduct..........................................................................................4

2. INDICATIONS.......................................................................................................................................6

2.1 HealthCanada-ApprovedIndications........................................................................................63. MANUFACTURER’SREQUESTEDLISTINGCRITERIA.............................................................................7

3.1 RequestedListingCriteria..........................................................................................................7 3.2 RationaleforRequestedListingCriteria....................................................................................7

4. BIOSIMILARITY....................................................................................................................................8

4.1 QualityInformation...................................................................................................................8 4.2 KeyClinicalStudies....................................................................................................................9 4.3 Pharmacokinetics.....................................................................................................................24 4.4 Immunogenicity.......................................................................................................................25

5. CRITICALAPPRAISALOFCLINICALSTUDIES......................................................................................27

5.1 InternalValidity.......................................................................................................................27 5.2ExternalValidity..........................................................................................................................28

6. EXTRAPOLATIONOFINDICATIONS....................................................................................................30

6.1 Manufacturer’sRationaleforExtrapolation............................................................................30 6.2 HealthCanada’sConclusiononExtrapolation.........................................................................34 6.3 InternationalRegulatoryConclusionsonExtrapolation..........................................................35 6.4 CDRCommentsonExtrapolation............................................................................................36

7. COSTCOMPARISON..........................................................................................................................398. DISCUSSION.......................................................................................................................................429. CONCLUSION.....................................................................................................................................44APPENDIX1:ADDITIONALDATA................................................................................................................45APPENDIX2:DRUGPLANLISTINGSTATUSFORREFERENCEPRODUCT....................................................51APPENDIX3:SUMMARYOFPATIENTINPUT.............................................................................................67REFERENCES...............................................................................................................................................70

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

iiCommonDrugReview November2017

ABBREVIATIONS5-ASA 5-aminosalicylicacidACPM AdvisoryCommitteeonPrescriptionMedicinesADA anti-drugantibodiesADCC antibody-dependentcell-mediatedcytotoxicityAE adverseeventAS ankylosingspondylitisATI anti-infliximabantibodiesCCC Crohn’sandColitisCanadaCD Crohn'sdiseaseCDAI Clinical/Crohn’sDiseaseActivityIndexCDC complement-dependentcytotoxicityCDEC CanadianDrugExpertCommitteeCDR CommonDrugReviewCSR ClinicalStudyReportCTD CommonTechnicalDocumentsDMARD disease-modifyingantirheumaticdrugEAP ExceptionalAccessProgramELISA enzyme-linkedimmunosorbentassayEMA EuropeanMedicineAgencyEU EuropeanUnionFCD FistulizingCrohn'sdiseaseFDA FoodandDrugAdministrationGI gastrointestinalHCP residualhostcellproteinHMW highmolecularweightIBD inflammatoryboweldiseaseIGF-1 recombinantinsulin-likegrowthfactor1IgG1 chimerichuman-murineimmunoglobulinG1IL interleukinIRR infusion-relatedreactionLD50 lethaldose50LOCF lastobservationcarriedforwardLPS lipopolysaccharideLRV log10reductionvalueMAH MarketingAuthorizationHolderMLR mixedlymphocytereactionMMP matrixmetalloproteinaseMSS MayoscoringsystemMTX methotrexateNDS NewDrugSubmissionNK naturalkillerNOC NoticeofCompliancePBMC peripheralbloodmononuclearcell

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

iiiCommonDrugReview November2017

PBRER periodicbenefit-riskevaluationreportPK pharmacokineticPsA psoriaticarthritisPsO plaquepsoriasisPSUR PeriodicSafetyUpdateReportRA rheumatoidarthritisRCT randomizedcontrolledtrialSAE seriousadverseeventSCCAI SimpleClinicalColitisActivityScoreSD standarddeviationSEB subsequententrybiologicSOC systemorganclassSNDS SupplementalNewDrugSubmissionsTNFalpha solubletumournecrosisfactoralphaTEAE treatment-emergentadverseeventTESAE treatment-emergentseriousadverseeventTGA TherapeuticGoodAdministrationtmTNFalpha transmembranetumournecrosisfactoralphaTNFalpha tumournecrosisfactoralphaTNFR TNFreceptorUC ulcerativecolitisUS UnitedStates

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

ivCommonDrugReview November2017

EXECUTIVESUMMARY

ApproachtotheReviewTheCADTHCommonDrugReview(CDR)approachtoreviewingInflectrafollowedtheCDRProcedureandSubmissionGuidelinesforSubsequentEntryBiologics(March,2014).TheCDRteamreviewedtheinformationprovidedbythemanufacturerregardingproductinformation,indicationsunderreview,themanufacturer’srequestedlistingcriteria,biosimilarity,extrapolation,andcost.ClinicalStudyReportsandpublishedarticleswerealsoappraised.Reviewersprovidedacriticalappraisaloftheclinicalevidence,adiscussionofextrapolationfromtheindicationsofrheumatoidarthritis(RA)andankylosingspondylitis(AS)toinflammatoryboweldisease(IBD),andanevaluationofcost.ProductInformationInflectra(CT-P13;infliximab)isasubsequententrybiologic(SEB)basedonthereferenceinfliximabproduct(Remicade).InflectrahasbeenapprovedinCanadaforthefollowingindications:• Useincombinationwithmethotrexate(MTX)forthereductioninsignsandsymptoms,inhibitionof

theprogressionofstructuraldamage,andimprovementinphysicalfunctioninadultpatientswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveRA.

• ReductionofsignsandsymptomsandimprovementinphysicalfunctioninpatientswithactiveASwhohaverespondedinadequatelyto,orareintolerantto,conventionaltherapies.

• Reductionofsignsandsymptoms,inductionofmajorclinicalresponse,andinhibitionoftheprogressionofstructuraldamageofactivearthritis,andimprovementinphysicalfunctioninpatientswithpsoriaticarthritis(PsA).

• Treatmentofadultpatientswithchronic,moderatetosevereplaquepsoriasis(PsO)whoarecandidatesforsystemictherapy.Forpatientswithchronic,moderatePsO,Inflectrashouldbeusedafterphototherapyhasbeenshowntobeineffectiveorinappropriate.

• Reductionofsignsandsymptoms,inductionandmaintenanceofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealingandreductionofcorticosteroiduseinadultpatientswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveCrohn'sdisease(CD)whohavehadaninadequateresponsetoacorticosteroidand/oraminosalicylate.Inflectracanbeusedaloneorincombinationwithconventionaltherapy.

• TreatmentoffistulizingCD(FCD),inadultpatientswhohavenotrespondeddespiteafullandadequatecourseoftherapywithconventionaltreatment.

• Reductionofsignsandsymptoms,inductionandmaintenanceofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealing,andreductionoreliminationofcorticosteroiduseinadultpatientswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis(UC)whohavehadaninadequateresponsetoconventionaltherapy(i.e.,aminosalicylateand/orcorticosteroidand/oranimmunosuppressant).

ThemanufacturerisrequestingthatInflectrabereimbursedforadultswithCD,FCD,andUC.TheindicationsforRA,AS,PsO,andPsAwerepreviouslyreviewedbyCDRin2015.ClinicalEvidenceCT-P13PMS(post-marketingsurveillance)isanongoing(fouryear)phaseIV,open-label,singlearmstudyofCT-P13forallapprovedindicationsinSouthKorea.AninterimanalysiswasconductedinadultswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveCD(N=83),FCD(N=12),andmoderatelytoseverelyactiveUC(N=78)across15studycentresinSouthKoreawithfollow-upof30weeks.CT-P13wasadministeredevery8weeks(±5days)afterinductiontherapyofthree5mg/kgdosesatweeks0,2,and6.Mostpatients(59.0%)receiveddosesof5mg/kg.Higherdosesof5mg/kgto10mg/kgwereadministeredto

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

vCommonDrugReview November2017

41%ofpatients.TheefficacyanalysissetconsistedofpatientswhoreceivedatleastonedoseofCT-P13andhadatleastoneassessmentfollowingbaseline(N=145,83.8%).Allpatientswereincludedinthesafetyanalyses.Outcomesofclinicalresponse,remission,diseasecontrol,needforrescuemedication,andsafetywerereportedforpatientswithCD,FCD,andUCaswellasmucosalhealingforpatientswithUC.Basedonlastobservationcarriedforward(LOCF)imputation,amongCDinfliximab-naivepatients,31/39(79.5%)achievedclinicalresponseand23/39(59.0%)achievedclinicalremissionatweek30.AmongCDpatientswhowereswitchedfromRemicadetoCT-P13,25/31(80.6%)achievedremissionthroughoutvisitstwotosixand27/31(87.1%)patientsdidnotexperiencediseaseworsening.InFCDinfliximab-naivepatients,2/6(33.3%)achievedclinicalresponseand1/6(16.7%)achievedclinicalremission.InFCDpatientsswitchedfromRemicadetoCT-P13,clinicalremissionanddiseasecontrolwasachievedinonlyonepatientatvisitsix.InUCinfliximab-naivepatients,39/54(72.2%)achievedclinicalresponseand20/54(37.0%)achievedclinicalremissionatweek30.AmongUCpatientswhowereswitchedfromRemicadetoCT-P13,5/11(45.5%)achievedremissionthroughoutvisitstwotofiveandnopatientsexperienceddiseaseworsening.BasedoncompletecaseanalysisofUCinfliximab-naivepatients,9/13(69.2%)experiencedmucosalhealingatweek30while6/9(66.7%)patientswhowereswitchedfromRemicadetoCT-P13experiencedmucosalhealingthroughoutvisitstwotofive.ThemanufactureralsosubmitteddatatoHealthCanadasuggestingsimilarincidencesofclinicalresponseandremissionatweeks14and30forCDandUC,andmucosalhealingforUC,amongtreatment-naivepatientsintheCT-P13PMSstudyandpatientsfrompreviouslyconductedRemicadestudies.Atotalof51treatment-emergentadverseevents(TEAEs)in38patientsoccurredinCT-P13PMS.TherewerenonotabledifferencesinTEAEsbetweenpatientswhowereinfliximab-naive(23.9%)andthosewhoswitchedfromRemicade(18.3%).Nomalignancies,pneumonia,deaths,oranyothereventsofspecialinterestwereobservedduringthe30-weekinterimperiod.TheCT-P13PMSstudyislimitedbyitsuncontrolledobservationaldesign,smallsamplesize,absenceofimportantefficacyoutcomes,suchasextra-intestinalmanifestations,diseasebiomarkers,qualityoflife,andimmunogenicity,andshortdurationoffollow-up(30-weekinterimanalysis).ThegeneralizabilityoftheobservedoutcomesinpatientsfromSouthKoreatoCanadianpatientswithIBDisuncertain.OtherStudies:CT-P134.1isasmall(N=20)phaseIV,ongoing(fouryear),open-label,singlearmstudyconductedinadultpatientswithCDorUCinSouthKorea.Aninterimanalysisofefficacyandsafetyin10patients(vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv)fromvvvstudycentreswasavailableforreview.OtherobservationalstudiesofCT-P13inIBD,notsponsoredbythemanufacturer,havebeenconductedincohortsfromNorway,Hungary,theCzechRepublic,andKorea.Themanufacturerconductedasystematicliteraturesearchofrandomizedcontrolledtrials(RCTs)andobservationalstudiesofthereferenceproductRemicade,inpatientswithCDandUC.Ratesofinfusion-relatedreactions(IRRs),infections,pneumonia,tuberculosis,malignancies,andneedforsurgeryorhospitalizationwerecomparedwithratesfromobservationalstudiesofCT-P13(PMS+non-Celltrionsponsoredstudies).SafetydataweregenerallysimilarbetweenCT-P13andthereferenceproduct,Remicade,intreatment-naiveandswitchedpatientscombinedforIRRs,pneumonia,tuberculosis,andmalignancies.ThereweresomedifferencesbetweenRemicadeandCT-P13fortheratesofinfection,ratesofsurgery,anddisease-relatedhospitalization;however,theinterpretationofthedataislimitedduetothedifferencesinstudydesign,studypopulations,andoutcomedefinitions.Overall,datafromcumulativepost-marketingpatientexposuretoCT-P13fromOctober2013toDecember2015suggestthatnonewsafetysignalshaveemerged.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

viCommonDrugReview November2017

ExtrapolationCT-P13(Inflectra)receivedmarketauthorizationinCanadainJanuary2014fortheindicationsofPsOandPsAbasedontheextrapolationofevidencefromstudiesconductedinpatientswithRAandAS.ExtrapolationwassupportedbysimilaritiesinthepathologyofRA,AS,PsA,andPsOandthemechanismofactionofalltumournecrosisfactoralpha(TNFalpha)blockersintheseindications.InJune2016,HealthCanadaapprovedCT-P13foradultCD,FCD,andUC.TheEuropeanMedicinesAgency(EMA),theFoodandDrugAdministration(FDA),andtheAustralianTherapeuticGoodsAdministrationhavealsoapprovedCT-P13forCDandUC.InHealthCanada’sinitialreviewofCT-P13forallindications,someconcernsaboutextrapolatingdatafromstudiesconductedinpatientswithRAandAStoIBDwerementioned.TheseincludeddifferencesindiseasemechanismsbetweenrheumaticandboweldiseasesandhigherriskofhepatosplenicT-celllymphomainpatientswithIBDtreatedwithinfliximab.ThepredominantformofTNFinRAandASissolubleTNFalpha(sTNFalpha);whereas,inCDandUC,transmembraneTNFalpha(tmTNFalpha)playsanadditionalandcentralrole.Also,unlikeRAandAS,inboweldiseasesantibody-dependentcell-mediatedcytotoxicity(ADCC)isanimportantmechanismofactionandismediatedbyafucosylationandFcγIIIareceptorbinding.MinordifferenceshavebeenobservedbetweenCT-P13andthereferenceproductinFcγIIIabindingandADCCactivityusinginvitroassayswithnaturalkiller(NK)cellsfrompatientswithCDandV/VorV/FFcγIIIagenotype(nodifferenceobservedwithF/Fgenotype).Inotherassaysusingperipheralbloodmononuclearcells(PBMCs)frompatientswithCDandV/ForF/FFcγIIIagenotype,nodifferenceinADCCactivitywasobserved.InJune2016,HealthCanadaauthorizedtheuseofCT-P13fortheIBDindicationsbasedonextrapolationfrompreviouslysubmittedclinicalstudiesinpatientswithRAandAS,comparablepharmacokinetics,andnewlysubmittedphysiochemicalandbiologicaldata.1OtherconsiderationsfortheextrapolationofdatabetweenRAandAS,andIBD,includedifferencesintreatmentstrategiesbetweentheindications,suchastheuseofconcomitantmedication,andthehigherdoses(>5mg/kg)ofCT-P13thatmaybeused.InCT-P13PMS,41%ofpatientsreceiveddoseshigherthan5mg/kgofCT-P13andnonotabledose-dependentdifferencesinthedistributionofTEAEswereobservedbetweenpatientswhoreceived5mg/kgorpatientswhoreceived>5mg/kg.However,theimmunogenicsimilarityofthehigherdosecomparedwitharegularorhigherdoseofRemicadeisuncertain.CostComparisonThemanufacturer’ssubmittedpriceforInflectra($525.00per100mgvial)is47%lowerthanthepriceofinfliximab($987.56per100mgvial),whenusingtheOntarioExceptionalAccessProgram(EAP)priceforinfliximab.ClinicalExpertComments1Theclinicalexpertconsultedforthisreviewnotedthatbothprivateandpublicdrugplanshaveguidelinesinplacethatstipulatewhichpatientsareeligiblefortreatmentwithanti-TNFdrugs,andCT-P13willfitwithinthatframework.Theexpertindicatedthatanimportantquestion,whichwillneedtobeaddressedifthedrugisintroduced,iswhetherpatientswhoarestableonthereferenceproduct,

1 ThisinformationisbasedoninformationprovidedindraftformbytheclinicalexpertconsultedbyCDRreviewersforthepurposeofthisreview.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

viiCommonDrugReview November2017

Remicade,willhavetheirtreatmentsubstitutedwithCT-P13orwhetheritwillonlybeusedintreatment-naivepatients.Endoscopicevaluationofdiseaseactivitymayberequiredinpatientswhoexperienceadiseaseflareafterswitching,andtherearesignificantbarrierstothatintermsofaccesstoendoscopy.Currently,limitedevidenceisavailabletoassessandpredictpatientresponsetoswitchingfromRemicadetoCT-P13.ConclusionCT-P13providescliniciansandpatientswithanotherpotentiallycost-effectivechoiceofabiologicaldrugforIBD.ThefocusofthisCDRreviewofCT-P13(Inflectra)isfortherecentlyapprovedindicationsofCD,FCD,andUCinadultpatients.TheNoticeofCompliance(NOC)fortheCD,FCD,andUCindicationswasgrantedsubsequenttoanearlierNOCforCT-P13fortheindicationsofRA,AS,PsO,andPsA.Ofnote,HealthCanadaapprovedtheindicationsofPsOandPsAbasedontheextrapolationofdatafromstudiesconductedwithpatientswithRAandAS.AllclinicalevidencecurrentlyavailableforCT-P13inpatientswithIBDisbasedonobservational,open-labelstudiesfromKoreaorEuropeinsmallnumbersofpatients.Thepivotalstudy,CT-P13PMS,isanobservational,open-labelstudyconductedinSouthKoreainpatientswithIBD,witha30-weekinterimanalysis.NaiveindirectcomparisonsofCT-P13withstudiesofRemicade(infliximab)suggestsimilarefficacyandsimilarsafetyforsomesafetyendpointsinpatientswithCDorUC.Nonetheless,intheabsenceofdatafromRCTs,theclinicalsimilarityofCT-P13andRemicadeforIBDintheCanadianpopulationremainsuncertain.GiventhattheresultsofCT-P13PMSarebasedonaninterimanalysis,theongoingmonitoringofCT-P13inpatientswithIBDwillbeimportantforevaluatinglong-termefficacyandsafety.Note:Referencesinsquarebrackets[]indicatethereferencescitedbythemanufacturer,whilethereferencescitedbyCDRareindicatedbysuperscripts.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

1CommonDrugReview November2017

1. PRODUCTINFORMATION1.1 OverviewoftheSEBProductHospirahasaco-exclusivedistributionagreementinplacewithCelltrionHealthcareCorporationwherebyCelltrionHealthcareCorporationisthemanufactureroftheinfliximabbiosimilarCT-P13,whichismarketedundertheTradenameINFLECTRA®orREMSIMA®.CelltrionHealthcareCorporationistheMarketingAuthorizationHolder(MAH)forREMSIMA®(infliximab;CT-P13)inanumberofterritoriesandHospiraistheMAHforINFLECTRA®(infliximab;CT-P13)inanumberofterritories,someofwhichoverlapwithCelltrionHealthcareCorporation.Inthefollowingsectionsofthistemplate,CT-P13,INFLECTRA®andREMSIMA®allrefertothesamemolecule,theinfliximabbiosimilarmanufacturedbyCelltrion.InCanada,HospirahasacquiredtherighttomarketanddistributeINFLECTRA®(infliximab;CT-P13)fromCelltrionHealthcareCorporation.Characteristics Manufacturer-ProvidedDetails

INFLECTRA® REMICADE®Brandname: INFLECTRA® REMICADE®Non-proprietaryname: Infliximab InfliximabManufacturer: HospiraHealthcareCo. JanssenInc.Strength(s): 100mg/vial 100mg/vialDosageform: PowderforSolution,Sterile,

LyophilizedPowderforSolution,Sterile,Lyophilized

Routeofadministration: IntravenousInfusion IntravenousInfusionDrugIdentificationNumber(s): 02419475 02244016Therapeuticclassification: BiologicalResponseModifier BiologicalResponseModifierExcipients Sucrose,sodiumdihydrogen

phosphatemonohydrate,di-sodiumhydrogenphosphatedihydrate,polysorbate80.Nopreservativesarepresent.

Dibasicsodiumphosphatedihydrate,monobasicsodiumphosphatemonohydrate,polysorbateandsucrose.Nopreservativesarepresent.

Impuritiesa Product-relatedHighmolecularweightspecies:vvvvvvvvvvvOthers:seeTablebelowProcess-relatedResidualhostcellprotein:vvvvvvResidualhostcellDNA:vvvvv(max)ResidualProteinA:vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvOthers:seesectionbelow

Product-relatedHighmolecularweightspecies:vvvvvvvvvvvOthers:seeTablebelowProcess-relatedNotavailable,seeexplanationattheendofthissection

Source:INFLECTRA®andREMICADE®productmonographsaIncludebothproductandprocess-relatedimpurities.PleasenotethattherehavebeennochangestothemanufacturingofINFLECTRA®sincetheNewDrugSubmission(NDS)wasfiledtoHealthCanadain2012,andsubsequentNOCgrantedin2014fortheRA,AS,PsAandPsOindications.Thismeansthat,fortheconsiderationofthecurrentCDRsubmissionfortheindicationsofCDandUC,thepharmaceuticalform,composition,dosageform,strength,routeofadministration,purityandimpuritiesforINFLECTRA®remainthesameasdescribedinthefirstCDRINFLECTRA®submissionandpositiverecommendationin2014fortheRA,AS,PsAandPsOindications.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

2CommonDrugReview November2017

Therefore,fortheremainderofSection1.1ofthetemplate,thesameinformationthatwassubmittedintheoriginalINFLECTRA®CDRsubmissionisbeingincluded.Asfortheproduct-relatedimpurities,itwastestedinthe3-waysimilaritystudiesandtheresultsareinlinewithwhatwassubmittedintheoriginalCDRsubmission(CTDModule3.2.R).Ifmoredetailsarerequiredonthissection,theINFLECTRA®submissionfrom2014shouldbeconsulted.Pharmaceuticalform:chimerichuman-murineimmunoglobulinG1(IgG1)monoclonalantibody

Pharmaceuticalcomposition:astheformulationofINFLECTRA®wassetidenticaltothatofREMICADE®,thedosageformforbothproductscontain100mginfliximab,500mgsucrose,0.5mgpolysorbate80,2.2mgsodiumdihydrogenphosphatemonohydrateand6.1mgdi-sodiumhydrogenphosphatedihydrate.Nopreservativesarepresent.

Dosageform:bothINFLECTRA®andREMICADE®arethesamedosageform,namelyformulatedaswhitelyophilizedpowder.

Strength:bothINFLECTRA®andREMICADE®aresuppliedin100mgvialstobereconstitutedwith10mLsterilewaterresultinginafinalconcentrationof10mg/mL.Forbothproducts,thetotaldoseofthereconstitutedproductmustbefurtherdilutedto250mLwith0.9%SodiumChlorideInjectionUSP.

Routeofadministration:bothINFLECTRA®andREMICADE®areadministratedviaintravenousinfusion.(PleasebeadvisedthatintheREMICADE®productmonograph(p.3),routeofadministrationislistedasi.v.injection,however,infusioniscitedintheremainingofthedocument).

Purityandimpurities:Product-relatedimpuritiesProduct-relatedimpuritiesinclude:oxidizedvariants,deamidatedvariants,C-terminallysinevariants,glyco-variants,highmolecularweight(HMW)speciesaswellasmolecularfragments.Asummaryoftheresultsforproduct-relatedimpuritycomparisonbetweenINFLECTRA®drugproductandREMICADE®arepresentedinthetablebelow.Impurity TestMethod ResultsOxidizedvariants

PeptideMapping(liquidchromatography-mass-spectrometry;LC-MS)

• Basedontheavailabledata,itcanbeconcludedthatonlyverylowandcomparableamountsofoxidizedmolecularvariantsarepresentinIFTdrugproductandREMICADE®.

Deamidatedvariants

Ion-exchangechromatography-highperformanceliquidchromatography(IEC-HPLC)

• vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

C-lysineterminalvariants

IEC-HPLC • ItwasdemonstratedthatthedifferenceobservedbetweenINFLECTRA®andREMICADE®withrespecttotherelativeproportion(peakratio)ofthe6IEC-HPLCpeaksisattributabletoC-terminallysinevariability.

• However,ithasbeenshownthatC-terminallysinevariabilityholdsnobearingonbiologicalactivityinvitro,andthatC-terminallysineclippingoccursrapidlybothinvitroandinvivo,suggestingthatnearlyallinfliximabmoleculesarefullyclippedwithinseveralhoursfollowingdosing.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

3CommonDrugReview November2017

Impurity TestMethod ResultsGlyco-variants

SiteSpecificandN-LinkedGlycanAnalysisbyMeansofLC-MSPeptideMapping;OligosaccharideProfiling;MonosaccharideAnalysis;SialicAcidAnalysis

• Asparagine300wasshowntobetheonlysiteofN-glycosylationforbothINFLECTRA®andREMICADE®.NoO-linkedglycansweredetected,asonemightexpectforanIgG1monoclonalantibody,forINFLECTRA®ortheREMICADE®.

• BothINFLECTRA®drugproductandREMICADE®wereshowntocontainmostlyG0FandG1Fstructures.MinorspeciesincludingMan5,G2F,G0FminusN-acetylglucosamine,andG0weredetected.

• HPAEC-PADdatarevealthatthetypeandproportionoftheunchargedglycansisconservedbetweenINFLECTRA®andtheREMICADE®.

• Theidentifiedsugarswerevvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv;bothINFLECTRA®andREMICADE®hadsimilarmolarratiosforthe4sugars.

• ThemolarratioofneutralandaminosugarswasobservedtobehighlysimilarforINFLECTRA®drugproductandREMICADE®.

• INFLECTRA®samplescontainthesametypeaswellashighlysimilarlevelsofsialicacid(expressedasmolarratios)whencomparedtoREMICADE®.

Highmolecularweightspecies

Sizeexclusionchromatography(SEC)-HPLC

• INFLECTRA®drugproductandREMICADE®samplescontainprominentlymonomerdrugsubstancewithinacomparablerange(vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv,respectively).Theimpuritiesarehighmolecularweightspecies,whichareallvvvvacrossbothINFLECTRA®andREMICADE®products.

Molecularfragments

Capillaryelectrophoresissodiumdodecylsulfate(CE-SDS)(Reduced/Non-Reduced)

• INFLECTRA®andREMICADE®displaythesametypesofIgGfragments.

• INFLECTRA®drugproductandREMICADE®havesimilaramountofintactIgG(vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv,respectively)

Process-relatedimpuritiesProcess-relatedimpuritiesinclude:residualhostcellprotein(HCP),hostcellDNA,residualProteinA,recombinantInsulin-LikeGrowthFactor1(IGF-1),recombinanthumaninsulinandPluronicF-68.Abriefsummaryoftheseresultscanbefoundbelow.i. IntermsofHCP,thelevelthatwasdetectedacrossvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvisgenerallyconsideredasanacceptablelevelfortherapeuticproteins.

ii. ThelevelofresidualhostcellDNA,vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv,belowtheacceptancecriterionof≤4ppb(pg/mg)atrelease.

iii. TherangeofresidualProteinAvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv,belowthelimitof≤4ppm(ng/mg).

iv. TheabilityoftheINFLECTRA®purificationprocesstoclearIGF-1andrecombinantinsulinwasevaluatedaspartofaspikingstudy.Thestudydemonstratedthatthecapabilityofclearancebyspecificachromatographyvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv(Log10reductionvalue)forIGF-1andvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv.

v. vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

4CommonDrugReview November2017

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv.

ForREMICADE®,theprocess-relatedimpuritiesandtheirclearanceisspecifictoeachmanufacturingprocess,therefore,Celltrion(manufacturerofINFLECTRA®)doesnothaveinformationonthemanufacturingprocessofREMICADE®andthetestsusedtodemonstrateclearanceoftheimpuritiesinthatprocess.ItisalsotechnicallyinappropriatetoapplyaCelltrionimpuritiestesttoREMICADE®togeneratethisdata.Theapproachisthereforeforthebiosimilarcompanytodevelopthemanufacturingprocessandcontrolstrategytoremoveprocess-relatedimpuritiesandtomaintaintheimpuritiesatthelowestpossibleleveltomeettheregulatoryrequirement.Process-relatedimpuritiessuchasresidualhostcellprotein,residualDNA,andendotoxinallfitthisapproach.Duetothesereasons,therearenoregulatoryagenciesrequestingthiscomparativeanalysis.1.2 OverviewoftheReferenceProductThereferenceproductdescribedinthissubmissionisREMICADE®(Infliximab;PowderforSolution,Sterile,Lyophilized,100mg/vial).REMICADE®iscurrentlyauthorizedforsaleandmarketinginCanada(DIN:02244016).TheinfliximabdrugsubstanceisachimericIgG1κantibody1328aminoacidsinlengththatiscomposedofhumanconstantandmurinevariableregions.InfliximabneutralizesthebiologicalactivityofhumanTNFαbybindingwithhighaffinitytothesolubleandtransmembraneformsofTNFα(sTNFα,andtmTNFα)andinhibitstheirbindingtoTNFreceptors(TNFRs).InCanada,REMICADE®(infliximab)isindicatedfor:1. useincombinationwithMTXforthereductioninsignsandsymptoms,inhibitionoftheprogression

ofstructuraldamageandimprovementinphysicalfunctioninadultpatientswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveRA.

2. thereductionofsignsandsymptomsandimprovementinphysicalfunctioninpatientswithactiveASwhohaverespondedinadequately,orareintolerantto,conventionaltherapies.

3. reductionofsignsandsymptoms,inductionandmaintenanceofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealingandreductionofcorticosteroiduseinadultpatientswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveCDwhohavehadaninadequateresponsetoacorticosteroidand/oraminosalicylate.REMICADE®canbeusedaloneorincombinationwithconventionaltherapy.

4. reductionofsignsandsymptomsandinductionandmaintenanceofclinicalremissioninpediatricpatientswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveCDwhohavehadaninadequateresponsetoconventionaltherapy(corticosteroidand/oraminosalicylateand/oranimmunosuppressant).ThesafetyandefficacyofREMICADE®isnotestablishedinpatientslessthan9yearsofage.

5. treatmentofFCD,inadultpatientswhohavenotrespondeddespiteafullandadequatecourseoftherapywithconventionaltreatment.

6. reductionofsignsandsymptoms,inductionandmaintenanceofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealing,andreductionoreliminationofcorticosteroiduseinadultpatientswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveUCwhohavehadaninadequateresponsetoconventionaltherapy(i.e.,aminosalicylateand/orcorticosteroidand/oranimmunosuppressant).

7. reductionofsignsandsymptoms,inductionandmaintenanceofclinicalremission,andinductionofmucosalhealinginpediatricpatientswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveUCwhohavehadaninadequateresponsetoconventionaltherapy(i.e.,aminosalicylateand/orcorticosteroidand/oranimmunosuppressant).ThesafetyandefficacyofREMICADE®havenotbeenestablishedinpatientslessthan6yearsofage.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

5CommonDrugReview November2017

8. reductionofsignsandsymptoms,inductionofmajorclinicalresponse,andinhibitionoftheprogressionofstructuraldamageofactivearthritis,andimprovementinphysicalfunctioninpatientswithPsA.

9. treatmentofadultpatientswithchronicmoderatetoseverePsOwhoarecandidatesforsystemictherapy.ForpatientswithchronicmoderatePsO,REMICADE®shouldbeusedafterphototherapyhasbeenshowntobeineffectiveorinappropriate.Whenassessingtheseverityofpsoriasis,thephysicianshouldconsidertheextentofinvolvement,locationoflesions,responsetoprevioustreatments,andimpactofdiseaseonthepatient’squalityoflife.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

6CommonDrugReview November2017

2. INDICATIONS

2.1 HealthCanada-ApprovedIndicationsIndication(s) Extrapolation• useincombinationwithmethotrexateforthereductioninsignsand

symptoms,inhibitionoftheprogressionofstructuraldamageandimprovementinphysicalfunctioninadultpatientswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiverheumatoidarthritis.

No

• thereductionofsignsandsymptomsandimprovementinphysicalfunctioninpatientswithactiveankylosingspondylitiswhohaverespondedinadequately,orareintolerantto,conventionaltherapies.

No

• reductionofsignsandsymptoms,inductionofmajorclinicalresponse,andinhibitionoftheprogressionofstructuraldamageofactivearthritis,andimprovementinphysicalfunctioninpatientswithpsoriaticarthritis.

Yes

• treatmentofadultpatientswithchronicmoderatetosevereplaquepsoriasiswhoarecandidatesforsystemictherapy.Forpatientswithchronicmoderateplaquepsoriasis,INFLECTRA®shouldbeusedafterphototherapyhasbeenshowntobeineffectiveorinappropriate.Whenassessingtheseverityofpsoriasis,thephysicianshouldconsidertheextentofinvolvement,locationoflesions,responsetoprevioustreatments,andimpactofdiseaseonthepatient’squalityoflife.

Yes

• reductionofsignsandsymptoms,inductionandmaintenanceofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealingandreductionofcorticosteroiduseinadultpatientswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveCrohn’sdiseasewhohavehadaninadequateresponsetoacorticosteroidand/oraminosalicylate.INFLECTRA®canbeusedaloneorincombinationwithconventionaltherapy

Yes

• treatmentoffistulizingCrohn’sdisease,inadultpatientswhohavenotrespondeddespiteafullandadequatecourseoftherapywithconventionaltreatment.

Yes

• reductionofsignsandsymptoms,inductionandmaintenanceofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealing,andreductionoreliminationofcorticosteroiduseinadultpatientswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitiswhohavehadaninadequateresponsetoconventionaltherapy(i.e.,aminosalicylateand/orcorticosteroidand/oranimmunosuppressant).

Yes

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

7CommonDrugReview November2017

3. MANUFACTURER’SREQUESTEDLISTINGCRITERIA

3.1 RequestedListingCriteriaRequestedListingCriteria• ListinasimilarmannertothepublicplanlistingcriteriaforREMICADE®.• Alternatively:reductionofsignsandsymptoms,inductionandmaintenanceofclinicalremission

andmucosalhealingandreductionofcorticosteroiduseinadultpatientswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveCrohn’sdiseasewhohavehadaninadequateresponsetoacorticosteroidand/oraminosalicylate.INFLECTRA®canbeusedaloneorincombinationwithconventionaltherapy.

• ListinasimilarmannertothepublicplanlistingcriteriaforREMICADE®.• Alternatively:treatmentoffistulisingCrohn’sdisease,inadultpatientswhohavenotresponded

despiteafullandadequatecourseoftherapywithconventionaltreatment.• ListinasimilarmannertothepublicplanlistingscriteriaforREMICADE®.• Alternatively:reductionofsignsandsymptoms,inductionandmaintenanceofclinicalremission

andmucosalhealing,andreductionoreliminationofcorticosteroiduseinadultpatientswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitiswhohavehadaninadequateresponsetoconventionaltherapy(i.e.,aminosalicylateand/orcorticosteroidand/oranimmunosuppressant).

3.2 RationaleforRequestedListingCriteriaTheover-archingrationalefortherequestedlistingcriteriaforallindicationslistedbelowisbasedontheprincipleofdemonstratedbiosimilaritybetweenINFLECTRA®andthecurrentlyreimbursedreferencemedicinalproduct,REMICADE®.First,theformulationofINFLECTRA®hasbeendesignedtoreplicatethatofREMICADE®andbothdrugproductsareidenticalwithrespecttostrength,pharmaceuticalform,routeofadministration,andcompositioninexcipients(seeSection1.1above).Second,theactivesubstanceofINFLECTRA®,infliximab,hasbeendevelopedasasimilarbiologicalmedicinalproducttothatoftheactivesubstanceofREMICADE®(infliximab).Specifically,anextensiveseriesoforthogonalmethodsweredesignedtocomparethephysiochemicalpropertiesaswellasthebiologicalactivitiesofINFLECTRA®andREMICADE®,andresultsclearlydemonstratedthattheactivesubstanceishighlysimilarbetweenthesetwoproducts(seeSection4.1fordetailedinformation).In2014,theCanadianDrugExpertCommittee(CDEC)issuedapositiverecommendationforINFLECTRA®forthePsAandPsOindicationsviaextrapolation.Similarly,thedatatosupporttheCDandUCindicationsforINFLECTRA®viaextrapolationisbasedonthetotalityoftheevidencecollectedfromthequality,non-clinical,andclinicalcomparabilityexercise.PleaseseebelowinSection6forManufacturer’srationale,aswellasInternationalRegulatoryConclusionstosupporttheCDandUCindicationsviaextrapolation.Currently,infliximab(REMICADE®)isreimbursedbyallCDR-participatingdrugplansacrossthecountryforthetreatmentofCD(seeAppendix2).Consequently,weanticipatethatINFLECTRA®willalsobereimbursedunderthesameclinicalcriteriaasREMICADE®fromtheseCDR-participatingdrugplans,assumingthattheCDECissuesapositiverecommendationforINFLECTRA®forCD.Currently,5oftheCDRparticipatingdrugplansreimburseinfliximab(REMICADE®)fortheUCindication.Inthese5provinces,weanticipateINFLECTRA®willalsobereimbursedunderthesameclinicalcriteriaasREMICADE®,assumingthattheCDECissuesapositiverecommendationforINFLECTRA®forUC.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

8CommonDrugReview November2017

TheCDR-participatingdrugplansthatdonotcurrentlyreimburseREMICADE®forUCmayfindthatsignificantcostsavingsassociatedwithusingINFLECTRA®maytakethisopportunitytoexpandtreatmentoptionstothepatientswhorequiretreatmentforthisindication.AssumingapositiveHealthCanadaandCDECrecommendationfortheseindications,therequestedlistingcriteriaarereasonableandjustified.

4. BIOSIMILARITY4.1 QualityInformationAproductcharacterizationexercisewasconductedpreviouslyusingarangeofstate-of-the-artmethodologiestodemonstratecomparabilitybetweenCT-P13andEuropeanUnion(EU)approvedREMICADE®.Theresultsofthese2-waysimilaritystudiescomparingCT-P13withEU-approvedREMICADE®werepresentedinthepreviousCDRsubmissionin(CTDModule3.2.R.5)oftheinitialSubmission.Subsequently,awiderangeoforthogonaltestmethodswereperformedtodeterminecomparabilityofCT-P13andREMICADE®ina3-waystudy(CTDModule3.2.R-reg-infodocument)usingEUandUnitedStates(US)approvedREMICADE®.Thesestudiesincludedanextensivecomparativeanalysisofprimary,secondaryandtertiarystructure,glycanprofilesandofpost-translationalmodificationsaswellascomparativestabilitystudies.Inaddition,manybiologicalassayshavebeenincludedtoevaluatesimilarityinallbiologicalactivitiesassociatedwithknownandputativefunctionsandtherapeuticeffects.Theanalyticalmethodsandbiologicalassaysusedinsimilaritystudieshavebeensuitablyvalidatedorqualifiedtoprovideahighlevelofassurancethatthemethodscoulddetectanyslightdifferencesandarescientificallysound,fitforpurpose,reliableandreproducible.Similaritywaspreviouslydemonstratedintermsofprimarystructure,secondaryandhigherorderstructureaswellassimilardisulfidebonding.ThisinformationwasincludedintheoriginalCDRSubmissionforINFLECTRA®aspartoftheCommonTechnicalDocuments(CTD).Foreaseofreference,thesameCTDdocumentsareincludedinthissection,andtheinformationcanbefoundintheCTD3.2.R-regdocument(Modules3.2.R.2.2,3.2.R.2.3.1,3.2.R.2.3.2,3.2.R.2.3.3,3.2.R.2.3.4,3.2.R.2.3.5and3.2.R.2.3.6).BelowisasummaryofkeyfindingsrelatedtoqualityattributesaswellasbiologicalactivitiesinrelationtoCDandUC:Qualityattributes:Asimilarglycosylationprofilewithminordifferencesinafucosylatedglycans(G0+Man5),whichresultsinalowerbindingaffinitytoFcγRIIIaandaloweractivityinthemostsensitiveADCCassayusingNKcellsaseffectorcellsandtmTNFαJurkattargetcellswasobservedforCT-P13.TheimpactofthelowerlevelofafucosylatedglycansinCT-P13hasbeencomprehensivelyinvestigated:1. The3-waystudyconfirmedthattherewasnodifferenceinbindingtoFcγRI,FcγRIIa,FcγRIIband

FcRn,C1qbinding(enzyme-linkedimmunosorbentassay-ELISA)andcomplement-dependentcytotoxicity(CDC)activityduetodifferencesincoreafucosylationlevels.

2. TheimpactonFcfunctionalityislimitedtoaslightreductioninrelativebindingaffinityofCT-P13torecombinantFcγRIIIa(VandFhemizygote).

3. TheslightdifferenceinafucosylatedglycansCT-P13doesnothavediscernibleimpactonimmunogenicityfollowingrepeatedadministrationusingthesensitiveassayappliedintheclinicalstudyprogram.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

9CommonDrugReview November2017

Biologicactivity:Inaddition,approximately20differentorthogonalbiologicaltestsdirectlyrelatedtothemechanismsofactionordownstreamtherapeuticeffectswereperformedwhichcomparedCT-P13tobothEUandUSapprovedREMICADE®anddemonstrated:• HighlysimilarbindingaffinitytosTNFα,neutralizationofsTNFα,suppressionofcytokineinduction

bysTNFαandsuppressionofapoptosisbysTNFα• SimilarbindingaffinitytotmTNFα,andresultingcytokinesuppressionthroughreversesignaling

followingbindingtotmTNFαhavebeenobservedforCT-P13versusEUandUSapprovedREMICADE®.Theinductionofapoptosisthroughreversesignalinghasbeenshowntobesimilar.

• Highlysimilarininductionofregulatorymacrophages,suppressionofT-cellproliferationandinmediatingwoundhealing

• HighlysimilarFcγRIa,FcγRIIa,FcγRnandC1qbindingaffinityandCDCactivity• SlightdifferencesinbindingaffinitytotheFcγRIIIaandFcγRIIIbreceptorobservedforCT-P13in

comparisonwithREMICADE®wereobserved.Therelevanceofthisfindingwaspreviouslyinvestigatedusingfurthermodelsanditwasdemonstratedthatthedifferencewasnotclinicallymeaningful.Thefindingsarealsosupportedbydatafromtheliterature.

• MarginaldifferencesinADCCactivityusingoneartificialcellsystemwereshowntohavenoclinicallymeaningfuleffect,sinceusingmoreclinicallyrelevantmodelsandasimilarassaysystemwithcellsderivedfromdonors,highsimilaritywasdemonstrated.Incommonwithotheranti-TNFmonoclonals,infliximabdoesnotinducediscernibleADCCactivityagainstnaturallyderivedtargetcells.Thus,ADCCdoesnotappeartoplayaroleinmediatingtherapeuticeffect.

Inconclusion,thesecomprehensiveanalyseshaveshownthatCT-P13issimilartoEUandUSapprovedREMICADE®inprimarystructure,higherorderstructure,aggregateandmonomericpurity,andpost-translationalmodifications.ThedifferencesdetectedbythesehighlysensitivemethodshavebeenshowntobeofnoclinicalrelevanceinASandRAstudiesandhighlyunlikelytohaveaclinicallymeaningfulimpactonefficacyorsafetyinIBDindications.TheextensiverangesofinvitroandexvivobiologicalassayshavedemonstratedcomparablebiologicalactivitiesforCT-P13andEUandUSapprovedREMICADE®inassaysmimickingtheputativemechanismsofactionofinfliximabinCDandUC.AbriefoverviewofthetestsandconclusionsfortheoligosaccharideprofilingandbiologicactivitycomparisonbetweenCT-P13andREMICADE®arepresentedinTable1ofAppendix1.4.2 KeyClinicalStudiesPleasenotethattheapprovalofINFLECTRA®fortheIBDindicationsfrombothHealthCanadaandtheCDRrelyontheconceptofextrapolation(seeSection6forfurtherexplanation).Therefore,basedonthealreadyestablishedhighdegreeofsimilaritybetweenINFLECTRA®andREMICADE®,postmarketingstudies(studyreports)willbeusedtoevaluatetheclinicalsafetyandefficacyofINFLECTRA®inCDandUCpatients.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

10CommonDrugReview November2017

4.2.1 Post-MarketingSurveillanceofCT-P13100mg(Infliximab)(monoclonalantibody,recombinant)toEvaluateitsSafetyandEfficacyinKorea

StudyName Design Objectives PopulationPost-MarketingSurveillanceofCT-P13100mg(Infliximab)(monoclonalantibody,recombinant)toEvaluateitsSafetyandEfficacyinKorea.ReferredtoinremainderofdocumentasstudyCT-P13PMS

Phase4open-labelsafetysurveillancestudy

TheobjectivesofthisPMSwastoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofCT-P13inKoreaunderroutinecare.

• AdultpatientswithmoderatetosevereactiveCDwhohadnotrespondeddespiteafullandadequatecourseoftherapywithcorticosteroidand/orandimmunosuppressant;orwhowereintoleranttoorhadmedicalcontraindicationsforsuchtherapies.

• AdultpatientswithFCDwhodidnotshowanyresponsetogeneraltreatments(includingantibiotics,drainageandimmunosuppressivetherapy).

• AdultpatientswithmoderatetosevereactiveUCwhohadaninadequateresponsetoconventionaltherapyincludingcorticosteroidsand6-mercaptopurineorazathioprine,orwhowereintoleranttoorhadmedicalcontraindicationsforsuchtherapies.

a) StudyCharacteristicsBriefdescriptionofthestudyThisPMSisanongoing,open-label,single-arm,phase4studythatisdesignedtoevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofCT-P13inallapprovedindicationsinSouthKorea.Thissurveillanceisplannedtobecarriedoutinapproximately60studycentersinSouthKoreawithanapproximatesamplesizeof1,600patients.AninterimanalysiswasperformedtoevaluatesafetyandefficacyofCT-P13inthespecificIBDpatientpopulation.Thisinterimanalysisincluded173patientswithIBDthathavebeentreatedwithCT-P13across15participatingIBDclinicalstudycenters.IBDpatientsenrolledinthisstudywereeithernaïvetoinfliximab(N=113)orwerepreviouslytreatedwithREMICADE®(N=60).Patientdisposition,demographicandbaselinecharacteristicsaredetailedbelow.IBDpatientsenrolledinthisstudycouldhavebeeneithernaïvetoinfliximaborwerepreviouslytreatedwithREMICADE®.Thereisnospecifieddosingwindow,asPMSisanobservationalstudy.Patientswillbetreatedaccordingtotheproductlabelandwillbefollowed-upuptoandincludingWeek30.Efficacyevaluationswereperformedaccordingtoplannedvisitsandcriteriasetforeachindividualindication:FCD,UCandCD.AllAdverseEvents(AEs)andSeriousAdverseEvents(SAEs)whichoccurredduringorafterCT-P13exposurewerecollectedthroughoutthestudy.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

11CommonDrugReview November2017

Characteristics Detailsfor(providestudyname)ST

UDYDESIGN

Objective ToevaluatethesafetyandefficacyofCT-P13inKoreaunderroutinecare.Studyperiod InitiationDate:23January2013

CompletionDate:on-goingCut-offdateforthisreport:14November2014

Studycentres Thisstudywasconductedat15clinicalcentersinKorea.Design ObservationalPhase4study,openlabel,singlearmInclusioncriteria AdultspatientswithmoderatetosevereCD,FCDandUCExclusioncriteria N/A

DRU

GS Intervention N/A

Comparator(s) N/A

DURA

TION

Run-in N/ATreatment N/Aasthisisanon-goingPostMarketingSurveillanceStudyFollow-up ForFCDandmoderatetosevereactiveUC,theefficacyevaluationwas

performedatbaseline,Week14andWeek30.TheevaluationofefficacyincaseswithmoderatetosevereactiveCDwasperformedatbaseline,Week2andWeek30.AllAEsandSAEswhichoccurredduringandafterCT-P13exposurewerecollectedthroughoutthestudy.

OUTC

OMES

PrimaryEndPoint(s) N/A

OtherEndPoints • ClinicalresponseforCDandUC• ClinicalremissionforCDandUC• DiseasecontrolforCDandUC• RescuemedicationforCDandUC• MucosalhealingforUC

NOTES

Publications • ParkSH,KimYH,LeeJHetal.ExpertRevGastroenterolHepatol.2015:9:sup1,35-44[1].

• clinicaltrials.govidentificationcode(e.g.,NCTXXXXXXXX):N/Ab) InterventionandComparatorsDosingandAdministrationDoseandregimenincludingdoseescalationwerecompliedwiththeapprovedposologybyKoreanMinistryofFoodandDrugSafetyandtimeintervalsbetweendoseswerecontrolledflexiblyupontheinvestigator’sdecisionunderroutinecare.PleaserefertotheCT-P13Koreanlabelfordosingandadministration[2].PatientswillbetreatedwithCT-P13every8weeks(±5days)followinginductiontherapy.ForFCDandmoderatetosevereactiveUC,theefficacyevaluationwasperformedatbaseline,Week14andWeek30.TheevaluationofefficacyincaseswithmoderatetosevereactiveCDwasperformedatbaseline,Week2andWeek30.AllAEsandSAEswhichoccurredduringandafterCT-P13exposurewerecollectedthroughoutthestudy.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

12CommonDrugReview November2017

ReferenceProductusedintheTrial:N/APlacebosandControls(ifapplicable):N/AConcomitantMedicationsAnynewtreatments(i.e.,treatmentsnotongoingatstudyentry)anddoseincreaseforexistingmedicationswereconsideredasrescuetreatments.Concomitantmedicationsforothermedicalconditionswerepermittedasclinicallyindicatedsubjecttospecificprotocolrequirementsoutlinedbelow.Permittedmedicationsincludedthefollowing:• Paracetamol• Oral5-AminosalicylicAcid(5-ASA)treatment• Inhaledortopicaldermatological(notperrectum)corticosteroids• Systemiccorticosteroids(e.g.,prednisone,budesonide,cortisoneacetate)• Oral5-ASAtreatmentinpatientsnotreceivingthismedicationatstudyentry.Forpatientsreceiving

5-ASAatstudyentry,noincreaseindosagewasallowed.• Corticosteroidsor5-ASAsperrectum• OthertreatmentsforUC,eithersystemicortopical,initiatedduringthetreatmentorobservation

period• AntibioticsusedfortreatmentofIBD.Theseincluded,butwerenotexclusiveto,agentsinthe

quinoloneclassandmetronidazole.c) Outcomes(KeyEfficacyandSafetyOutcomes)Efficacyevaluationsaretobeperformedaccordingtoplannedvisitsandcriteriasetforeachindividualindication.Allefficacyevaluationsaredescribedbelowbyindication:PatientswithFCD:• Proportionofpatientsachievingclinicalresponsedefinedasareductionofatleast50%from

baselineinthenumberofdrainingfistulas[3].• Proportionofpatientsachievingclinicalremissiondefinedastheabsenceofdrainingfistulas[3].• Proportionofpatientswithdiseasecontroldefinedbytheexclusionoflossofresponsecasesfrom

diseasecontrol.Lossofresponseisdefinedbytherecrudescenceofdrainingfistulas,theneedforachangeinmedicationforCDortheneedforadditionaltherapyforpersistentorworseningluminaldiseaseactivity,theneedforasurgicalprocedureforCD,orthediscontinuationofthestudymedicationowingtoaperceivedlackofefficacy[3].

PatientswithModeratetoSevereActiveCD:• Proportionofpatientsachievingclinicalresponsedefinedbya≥25%and≥70pointsdecreasein

ClinicalDiseaseActivityIndex(CDAI)scorefrombaselinescores[4].• ProportionofpatentsachievingclinicalremissiondefinedbyCDAIscoreof<150[4].• Proportionofpatientswithdiseasecontroldefinedbytheexclusionofdiseaseworseningcases

fromdiseasecontrol.DiseaseworseningisdefinedbyanincreaseinCDAIofatleast70pointsfromthequalifyingscorewithatotalscoreofatleast175andanincreaseinCDAIof35%ormorefromthebaselinevalue,ortheintroductionofanewtreatmentforactiveCD[4].

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

13CommonDrugReview November2017

PatientswithModeratetoSevereActiveUC:• ProportionofpatientsachievingclinicalresponsedefinedbyadecreaseinpartialMayoscoresfrom

baselineofatleast2pointsandatleast30%,withanaccompanyingdecreaseinthesubscoreforrectalbleedingofatleast1point,oranabsolutesubscoreforrectalbleedingof0or1[5].

• Proportionofpatientsachievingclinicalremission,whichisdefinedasatotalpartialMayoscoreof2pointsorlower,withnoindividualsubscoreexceeding1point[6].

• ProportionofpatientsachievingmucosalhealingdefinedbyMayoendoscopicsubscoreof≤1point.

• Proportionofpatientswithdiseasecontroldefinedthatdiseaseworseningcaseisexcludedfromdiseasecontrol.DiseaseworseningisdefinedbyanincreaseinpartialMayoscoreof≥3pointsfrombaseline(=beforeswitching)valueandapartialMayoscore≥5points.

PatientswithModeratetoSevereActiveCDandUC:• ForallIBDpatients,proportionofpatientsreceivingrescuemedicationwasassessed.Rescue

medicationisdefinedasanyconcomitantmedicationthatwerecommencedafterthefirstinfusiondatetotreatneworunresolvedsymptomsofCDorUC[7][8].

Thesafetyendpointswere:• Seriousadverseevents(SAEs).SAEwasconsideredassuchifit:

o resultedindeathorlife-threatening;o requiredinpatienthospitalizationorprolongationofexistinghospitalization;o causedapersistentorsignificantdisability/incapacity;o resultedinacongenitalanomaly/birthdefect;oro associatedwithanyothermedicallyimportantcondition.

• Adverseevents(AEs)• OtherinformationaboutsafetyAdverseeventswerecodedusingtheMedicalDictionaryforRegulatoryActivitiesVersion16.0.d) StatisticalAnalyses• AllstatisticalanalyseswereconductedusingSASVersion9.3(SASInstitute,Inc.).Continuousdata

weresummarizedusingdescriptivestatistics:n,mean,standarddeviation,median,minimumandmaximum,unlessotherwiseindicated.Categoricaldataweresummarizedusingcountsandpercentages.Datapresentedinlistingsweresortedbyindicationandthenbypatientnumberandvisit,whereapplicable.Allanalyseswereperformedbysubgroup(Naïve,Switch):NaïvegroupconsistsofpatientswhohadnotreceivedatleastonedoseofREMICADE®beforefirstinfusionofCT-P13.

• SwitchgroupconsistsofpatientswhohadeverreceivedatleastonedoseofREMICADE®beforefirstinfusionofCT-P13.

PremedicationThepremedicationwassummarizedbyindication,drugclassandpreferredtermforthesafetypopulation.Thepremedicationwasqualifiedwhencorticosteroids,antihistaminesoranalgesicswerecommencedatCT-P13infusiondateforthepurposeofprophylaxis.Afrequencytableforthemaximumamountofdosereceived(mg/kg)ispresentedbyindicationforpatientsinthesafetyanalysisset.PleaserefertoPMSstudyreport,Table9-4[9,Table9-4]showingthenumberandpercentageofpatientswithineachcategoryofamountofdosereceivedateachvisit

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

14CommonDrugReview November2017

EfficacyanalysisTheefficacyanalysissetconsistedofallpatientswhoreceivedatleastonedoseofCT-P13andhadatleastoneassessmentfollowingbaseline.Efficacyanalyseswereperformedontheefficacyanalysissetbyapplyingdifferentcriteriaforeachindication.Theproportionofpatientsachievingclinicalresponse,remissionanddiseasecontrolwereanalyzedbyindication.DescriptivestatisticsforactualvalueandchangefromBaselinewerepresentedbyindicationandvisitfornumberoffistulas,CDAIandMayoscore.LOCFmethodwasconsideredformissingdataimputationforclinicalresponseandremissionfornaïveCDandUCpatients.TheproportionofpatientsachievingmucosalhealingwasanalyzedinUCpatients.Therescuetherapywillbesummarizedbyindication,drugclassandpreferredtermforthesafetypopulation.TherescuetherapywasqualifiedwhenanyconcomitantmedicationwerecommencedafterthefirstinfusiondatetotreatneworunresolvedsymptomsofCDorUC.Discontinuedpatientswerenotincludedinthesummarytablesforefficacyanalysisateachvisit.SafetyanalysisThesafetyanalysissetconsistedofallpatientswhoreceiveatleastonedose(fullorpartial)ofthestudytreatmentduringanydosingperiod.Allanalysesofsafetywereconductedusingthesafetyanalysisset.SafetyanalyseswereperformedbypresentingdataonTreatment-EmergentAdverseEvents(TEAEs),anddurationofREMICADE®andCT-P13administration.TEAEsweresummarizedbyrelationship,intensity,systemorganclass,andpreferredtermdisplayingthenumberandpercentageofpatientswithatleastoneAEusingonlytheworstintensityrecordedateachlevelofsummarization.ThetotalnumberofeventsandnumberofpatientswithatleastoneAEoverallsystemorganclasseswasalsodisplayed.AdverseeventswerecodedusingtheMedicalDictionaryforRegulatoryActivitiesVersion16.0.RescuetherapyandpremedicationwerecodedusingtheWHODrugDictionaryVersion01September2013.AnalysisSetsTABLE1:NUMBEROFIBDPATIENTSINEACHPOPULATION-CT-P13PMSSTUDY

Analysisset ModeratetosevereactiveCD

FistulisingactiveCD ModeratetosevereactiveUC

Total Total

Naïve Switched Naïve Switched Naïve Switched Naïve Switched

Safetyanalysisset1 43 40 8 4 62 16 113 60 173

Efficacyanalysisset2 39 31 6 4 54 11 99 46 145

Source:[10,Table1]1Patientsadministeredatleast1doseofCT-P132Patientsadministeredatleast1doseofCT-P13andhadatleastoneofassessmentaftertreatmentForthedescriptionofthestatisticsprotocol,pleaserefertotheClinicalTrialStudyReport[9,page8].

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

15CommonDrugReview November2017

e) ResultsBaselineCharacteristicsTABLE2:SUMMARYOFDEMOGRAPHICANDBASELINECHARACTERISTICSFOR(CT-P13PMSSTUDYSAFETYANALYSISSETINTREATMENT-NAÏVEPATIENTS)Parameter Moderatetosevere

activeCD(N=43)FistulisingactiveCD(N=8)

ModeratetosevereactiveUC(N=62)

Total(N=113)

Age(years) 31.8(10.88) 27.9(10.13) 45.2(14.57) 38.9(14.71)

Mean(SD)

Median(range) 30.0(18-67) 25.5(18-48) 46.5(19-74) 39.0(18-74)

Sex,no(%) 34(79.1) 6(75.0) 40(64.5) 80(70.8)

Male

Female 9(20.9) 2(25.0) 22(35.5) 33(29.2)

Bodyweight(kg) 57.1(12.13) 71.2(11.77) 58.5(9.67) 58.8(11.26)

Mean(SD)

Median(range) 54.8(35-80) 67.9(57-93) 58.2(40-81) 58.0(35-93)

Baselinediseaseactivity1

340.0(90.35) 1.6(0.92) 6.8(1.13) n/a

Mean(SD)Median(range) 340.6(181-564) 1.0(1-3) 7.0(3-9)

Source:[10,Table2]1CDAIformoderatetosevereactiveCD,No.offistulaforfistulisingactiveCDandpartialMayoscoringsystem(MSS)inmoderatetosevereactiveUCpatientswereusedtoassessdiseaseactivity.

TABLE3:SUMMARYOFDEMOGRAPHICANDBASELINECHARACTERISTICSFOR(CT-P13PMSSTUDYSAFETYANALYSISSETINSWITCHEDPATIENTS)Parameter Moderatetosevere

activeCD(N=40)FistulisingactiveCD(N=4)

ModeratetosevereactiveUC(N=16)

Total(N=60)

Age(years) 31.1(10.41) 33.0(13.34) 42.9(13.54) 34.3(12.43)

Mean(SD)

Median(range) 28.5(19-60) 33.5(20-45) 41.0(21-64) 30.0(19-64)

Sex,no(%) 24(60.0) 3(75.0) 9(56.3) 36(60.0)

Male

Female 16(40.0) 1(25.0) 7(43.8) 24(40.0)

Bodyweight(kg) 58.9(13.45) 64.4(12.36) 58.0(9.46) 59.0(12.34)

Mean(SD)

Median(range) 60.0(37-97) 64.3(50-79) 56.9(40-73) 59.0(37-97)

Baselinediseaseactivity1

168.9(112.65) 0.5(0.58) 4.8(2.81) n/a

Mean(SD)

Median(range) 134.0(24-412) 0.5(0-1) 4.5(0-9)

Source:[10,Table3]1DAIformoderatetosevereactiveCD,No.offistularforfistulisingactiveCDandpartialMSSinmoderatetosevereactiveUCpatientsusedtoassessdiseaseactivity.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

16CommonDrugReview November2017

ThedemographicandbaselinecharacteristicsofpatientswereinlinewithtargetpatientpopulationinCT-P13andREMICADE®label.Overall,therewerenoimportantdifferencesbetweenCDandUCpatientsexceptthatUCpatientswereslightlyolderthanCDpatients.TherewasgreaterproportionofmalescomparedtofemalesinCDandUCsubgroups.Baselinediseasecharacteristicsinallsubgroupswereinlinewithmoderate-to-severeactivestatusofthedisease.Themajorityofinfliximab-naïvepatientswereexposedtoatleast3dosesoftreatmentwhichspanned6weekinductionperiodwith52.2%ofpatientsreachingdose6(30weeks).Likewise,themajorityofswitchedpatientswereexposedtoatleast3dosesoftreatmentand65.0%ofpatientsreacheddose5.ConcomitantConditionsandMedicationsAtotalof48of173(27.7%)patientsrequiredrescuemedicationtocontrolIBDsymptoms.However,lessthan15%ofCDandUCpatientsrequiredrescueanti-inflammatory,corticosteroidsorimmunosuppressionagents.Overall,theproportionofuseofrescuemedicationwashigherininfliximab-naïvegroupscomparedtoswitchedgroups[9,page10].EfficacyResultsThestudywasnotpoweredforefficacybuthadapositiveoutcomefortheefficacyendpointofinductionandmaintenanceofresponseinCD,FCDandUCpatientsregardlessoftreatment-naïveorswitchstatus.Pleaseseebelowkeyefficacyresults.2,3(A)Thefollowingresultsarebasedoncompletecaseanalysis:(i)AmongCDinfliximab-naïvepatients,vvvvvvvvvvvvandvvvvvvvvvvvvachievedclinicalresponseandvvvvvvvvvvvvandvvvvvvvvvvvvachievedclinicalremissionatweek14and30,respectively.(ii)AmongFCDinfliximab-naïvepatients,vvvvvvvvvandvvvvvvvvvachievedclinicalresponseatweek14and30,respectively.vvvvvvvvvvandvvvvvvvvvvachievedclinicalremissionatweek14and30,respectively.vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv.(iii)AmongFCDpatientsswitchedfromREMICADE®toCT-P13,clinicalremissionanddiseasecontrolwasvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv(iv)AmongUCinfliximab-naïvepatients,vvvvvvvvvvvvandvvvvvvvvvvvvachievedclinicalresponseandvvvvvvvvvvvvandvvvvvvvvvvvachievedclinicalremissionatweek14and30,respectively.(v)vvvvvvvvvvvvandvvvvvvvvvvvUCinfliximab-naïvepatientsexperiencedmucosalhealingatweek14and30whilevvvvvvvvvvpatientswhowereswitchedfromREMICADE®toCT-P13experiencedmucosalhealingthroughoutvisits2-5.(B)ThefollowingresultsarebasedonimputationofmissingdatawithLOCFandincludeallpatientsintheefficacyanalysisset.Theneedforrescuemedicationincludesallpatientsinsafetyanalysisset:(i)AmongCDinfliximab-naïvepatients,34/39(87.2%)and31/39(79.5%)achievedclinicalresponseatweek14and30,respectively.27/39(69.2%)and23/39(59.0%)achievedclinicalremissionatweek14and30,respectively.Rescuemedicationwasneededby7/43(16.3).

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

17CommonDrugReview November2017

(ii)AmongCDpatientswhowereswitchedfromREMICADE®toCT-P13,25/31(80.6%)achievedremissionthroughoutvisits2-6and27/31(87.1%)patientsdidnotexperiencediseaseworsening.Rescuemedicationwasneededby9/40(22.5%).(iii)AmongUCinfliximab-naïvepatients,40/53(75.5%)and39/54(72.2%)achievedclinicalresponseatweek14and30,respectively.26/53(49.1%)and20/54(37.0%)achievedclinicalremissionatweek14and30,respectively.Rescuemedicationwasneededby30/62(48.4%).(iv)AmongUCpatientswhowereswitchedfromREMICADE®toCT-P13,5/11(45.5%)achievedremissionthroughoutvisits2-5andnopatientsexperienceddiseaseworsening.Rescuemedicationwasneededby2/16(12.5%).SafetyResultsSafetyassessmentswerecarriedoutduringandafterCT-P13exposureandeventswererecordediftheyoccurredatanytimeduringthestudyperiod.2,3

Overall,CT-P13waswell-toleratedinalltreatedpatients.51TEAEwerereportedin38patients(22.0%).InpatientswithCD,19eventsoccurredin15/83patients(18.1%),inFCD2eventsoccurredin2/12patients(16.7%),andinUC30eventsoccurredin21/78patients(26.9%).22eventswereconsideredtoberelatedtotreatmentin18patients.Mosteventswereofmildseverityin25patients.FiveTESAEswerereportedin5(2.9%)patients:moderatetreatment-relatedtuberculosis(improved),moderatetreatment-relatedlungabscess(resolved),moderatetreatment-relatedanaphylacticreaction(resolved),severetreatment-relatedIRR(resolved),andseveretreatment-unrelatedabdominalpain(resolved).Amongthese5TESAEs,atotalof4caseswereconsideredtoberelatedtotreatmentand3casesledtodiscontinuationfromthestudy(IRR,lungabscess,andanaphylacticreaction).Infectionandseriousinfectionwerereportedin9patients(5.2%,vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv)and2patients(1.2%),respectively.Onlyonepatient(0.6%)hadactivetuberculosisafterCT-P13exposure.Infusion-relatedreactionincludinghypersensitivityandanaphylaxiswasreportedin9patients(5.2%).Therewerenopatientswithmalignancy,pneumonia,deathoranyothereventsofspecialinterestreportedinthestudy.Doseescalationresults• Themajorityofpatients(59.0%)receiveddosesof5mg/kgofCT-P13.41.0%patientsweretreated

withdoses>5-≤10mg/kg.Therewerenonotabledifferencesindose-escalationbetweeninfliximab-naïveandswitchedpatients.

TherewerenonotabledifferencesinincidenceofTEAEsbetweeninfliximab-naïveandswitchedpatientswith23.9%and18.3%ofpatients,respectively,reportedTEAEs.Furthermore,therewerenonotabledose-dependentdifferencesindistributionofTEAEsbetweenpatientswhoreceived5mg/kgor>5mg/kgdosesofCT-P13[9,page10].4.2.2 OtherLinesofEvidenceforUseofCT-P13inIBDa) OtherOngoingStudiesSponsoredbyCelltrion

(i)CT-P133.4:ThisisaphaseIIIefficacyandsafetystudytodemonstratenon-inferiorityofCT-P13withRemicadeinadultswithactiveCDover54weeks.Thedesignisrandomized,double-blind,parallelgroup.Anenrollmentof214patientsisplanned.Inaninterimanalysis(week14),formationofADAwas

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

18CommonDrugReview November2017

foundtobesimilarbetweenCT-P13andUS-licensedRemicadeinpatientsreceiving5mg/kg[75,page65].(ii)CT-P134.3:ThisisaphaseIV,observationalregistrystudyintheEuropeanUnionandSouthKoreatoevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyofCT-P13inpatientswithCDorUCovera5yearperiod.Anenrollmentof500patientsisplanned.Noresultsareavailabletodate.b) Non-CelltrionSponsoredStudiesThemanufacturerconductedasystematicsearchtoidentifynon-CelltrionsponsoredstudiesthatevaluatedtheuseofCT-P13inIBD.Sixobservationalstudiesinadultpatientswereidentified.ThesestudieswereconductedinNorway4,Hungary5,6,theCzechRepublic7,andKorea.8,9Eachstudyissummarizedbrieflyandselectedresultsprovided.Norway4:Aprospective,observationalstudywasconductedinasinglecenterin46patientswithCDand32patientswithUC.PatientsreceivedthreeinductiondosesofCT-P13atweeks0,2,and6,withthemajorityreceiving5mg/kg.Efficacyandsafetywereassesseduptoweek14.OfthepatientswithCD,79%achievedremission(Harvey-BradshawIndexscore≤4)andofthepatientswithUC,56%achievedremission(partialMayoscore≤2).StatisticallysignificantreductionsinC-reactiveproteinandcalprotectinfrombaselinetoweek14wereobserved.AdverseeffectsincludedIRRs(1patientwithCDand1withUC),colectomy(1patientwithUC),muscleandjointpainduetoantibodyformation(1patientwithCD),andinfections(patientswithCD:infectiousenterocolitis,herpeszoster,herpessimplex,recurrentupperairwayinfection;patientswithUC:pneumoniaanderysipelas).Hungary5,6:Gecseetal.conductedanationwide,multicentreprospectiveobservationalstudytoassesstheefficacy,safety,andimmunogenicityofCT-P13inpatientswithCD(N=126)orUC(N=84).PatientsreceivedCT-P135mg/kginductionatweeks0,2,and6andthenevery8weeksthereafter.Clinicalresponsewasachievedby81.4%ofpatientswithCD(decreaseinCDAI>70oratleast50%reductioninthenumberofdrainingfistulas)and77.6%ofpatientswithUC(decreaseinpartialMayoscore>3)atweek14.Clinicalremissionwasachievedby53.6%ofpatientswithCD(CDAI<150ornofistuladrainage)and58.6%ofpatientswithUC(partialMayoscore<3).Significantlymorepatientswhowereinfliximab-naïveachievedclinicalremissionatweek14comparedwithpatientswhohadpreviouslyreceivedtheinnovatorproduct.Infusion-relatedreactionswereexperiencedin14(6.6%)patientsandinfectionsin12(5.7%).Infusion-relatedreactionsoccurredatahigherincidenceinpatientswhowereswitchedfrominnovatorproduct(27%vs.2.5%).Molnaretal.examinedmucosalhealingsubsequenttoCT-P13administrationin12patientswithUC.Atweek6,clinicalresponsewasobtainedby2patients,clinicalremissionby5patients,andmucosalhealingwasobservedin7patients.TheCzechRepublic7:Apost-marketsurveillancestudyof140patientswithIBD(107CDand33UC)wasconductedwithaninterimanalysisofefficacyandsafetyatweek10(completefollow-upwillbetoweek30).Ofthe140patients,36weretreatment-naïveand104wereswitchedtoCT-P13fromotherbiologicalagents.Efficacydatawereavailablefortreatment-naïvepatientsonly(23CDand13UC).StatisticallysignificantreductionsinHarvey-BradshawIndexforCDandSimpleClinicalColitisActivityScore(SCCAI)forUCfrombaselinetoweek10wereobserved.Clinicalresponsewasobtainedby5patients(21.7%)withCD(decreaseinHarvey-BradshawIndex≥3)and6(46.2%)patientswithUC(decreaseinSCCAI≤2).Clinicalremissionwasobtainedby17(73.9%)patientswithCD(Harvey-BradshawIndex≤4)and2(15.4%)patientswithUC(SCCAI≤2).Comparedwithbaseline,therewerestatisticallysignificantreductionsinC-reactiveproteinandfecalcalprotectininbothCDandUC.Six

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

19CommonDrugReview November2017

TEAEs(IRRs,pneumonia,C.difficileinfection,tonsillitis,anddermatitispsoriasiform)wereexperiencedby6(4.3%)patients(3CDand3UC).Korea8,9:Kangetal.evaluated17patientswithIBD(8CDand9UC)whoreceivedCT-P13atasinglestudycenter.Amongtreatment-naïvepatients(N=8),clinicalresponse(CD:decreaseCDAI>60;UC:decrease>30%intheactivityindex+decreaseinrectalbleedingandendoscopysubscores)andremission(CD:CDAI<150;UC:Mayoscore≤2andnosubscores>1)wereachievedin7(2CDand5UC)atweek8.AmongpatientswhoswitchedtoCT-P13frominnovatorproduct(N=9),8hadsimilarclinicaloutcomes.OnepatientwithCDhadlossofresponse.Jungetal.conductedaretrospectivemulticenterstudyinpatientswithCD(N=59)andUC(N=51)withfollow-upto54weeks.Atweek8,clinicalresponseandremissionintreatment-naïvepatientswithCD(N=32)were90.6%and84.4%respectively.Atweek54,clinicalresponseoccurredin7/8(87.5%)andremissionin6/8(75.0%).Intreatment-naïvepatientswithUC(N=42),clinicalresponseandremissionatweek8were81.0%and38.1%respectively.Atweek54,clinicalresponseoccurredin12/12(100%)andremissionin6/12(50%).MucosalhealinginUCwasachievedin14/24(58.3%)atweek8andin2/3(66.7%)atweek54.Amongpatientswhoswitchedfromthereferenceproduct(27CDand9UC),efficacywasmaintainedin25(92.6%)withCDand6(66.7%)withUC.TherewerestatisticallysignificantdeclinesinC-reactiveproteinanderythrocytesedimentationrateinCDandUC.Six(11.8%)patientswithUCexperiencedanAE.4.2.3 SummaryofSafetySectiona) SafetyEvaluationPlanTheobjectiveoftheclinicaldevelopmentprogramforCT-P13wastodemonstratethatCT-P13iscomparabletothereferencemedicinalproduct,REMICADE®,intermsofitsclinicalpharmacology,efficacyandsafety.DatafromclinicaltrialsinRAandASpatientsshowedthatthesafetyprofilesofCT-P13andREMICADE®weresimilar.Inviewofthesedataandthestructural,biological,toxicologicalandpharmacokinetic(PK)comparabilitytothereferencedrugproductREMICADE®(CTDModules3.2Rand2.4),CT-P13isalsoexpectedtodisplayacomparablesafetyprofileinCDandUCpatients.Therefore,thesafetyevaluationinCDandUCpatientswasbasedonthesafetyprofileofREMICADE®aspresentedintheproductinformationfromREMICADE®productmonograph[11]andtheSummaryofProductcharacteristics[12].TocomparethesafetydataofCT-P13andthatofREMICADE®,literaturesearcheshavebeenperformedtoidentifyarticlesreportingREMICADE®studies.Thedatafromthesehistoricalstudieswereincludedinthemeta-analyseswithregardtotheincidenceofAdverseEventofSpecialInterest(AESI),inparticulartotheincidenceof(seeCTDModule2.7.4.2.1.5):• Infectionsincludingseriousinfections,pneumonia,activetuberculosis• Infusion-relatedreactionsincludinganaphylacticreactions• MalignanciesincludinglymphomaTheliteraturesearchesfocusedonRCTsandalsoconsideredobservationalstudies.PublicationswereselectedwhentheyreportedthemethodologyofcollectingsafetydataandspecificallyAEsandwhentheincidenceofAEswasclearlycapturedandreportedusingreliabledenominators.Forfurtherdetails,refertoaSystematicLiteratureReviewontheSafetyofinfliximabinthetreatmentofpatientswithCDandUC[13]andaSystematicliteraturereviewreportonREMICADE®observationalstudies[14].Belowarecomparisonsofoverallrates(per100patient-yearswith95%confidenceintervals)fromRCTsofRemicade(ACCENTI,ACCENTII,andSONIC,+others),observationalstudiesofRemicade,andobservationalstudiesofCT-P13.10

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

20CommonDrugReview November2017

1.Infusion-relatedreactions:CD:Remicade(RCTs)–vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsRemicade(observational)-vvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsCT-P13(PMS+non-Celltrionsponsoredstudies)–vvvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsUC:Remicade(RCTs)–vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsRemicade(observational)–vvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsCT-P13(PMS+non-Celltrionsponsoredstudies)–vvvvvvvvvvvvvper100patientyears2.Infections:CD:Remicade(RCTs)–vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsRemicade(observational)-vvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsCT-P13(PMS+non-Celltrionsponsoredstudies)–vvvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsUC:Remicade(RCTs)–vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsRemicade(observational)–vvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsCT-P13(PMS+non-Celltrionsponsoredstudies)–vvvvvvvvvvvvvper100patientyears

3.Pneumonia:CD:Remicade(RCTs)–vvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-years*Remicade(observational)–vper100patient-yearsCT-P13(PMS+non-Celltrionsponsoredstudies)–vvvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsUC:Remicade(RCTs)–vvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsRemicade(observational)–vvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsCT-P13(PMS+non-Celltrionsponsoredstudies)–vvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-years*PneumoniawasnotreportedinACCENTI,ACCENTII,orSONIC

4.Tuberculosis:CD:Remicade(RCTs)–vvvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsRemicade(observational)–vvvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsCT-P13(PMS+non-Celltrionsponsoredstudies)–vvvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsUC:Remicade(RCTs)–vvvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsRemicade(observational)–vvvvvvvvvvvvvper100patientyearsCT-P13(PMS+non-Celltrionsponsoredstudies)–vper100patient-years5.Malignancies:CD:Remicade(RCTs)–vvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsRemicade(observational)–vvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsCT-P13(PMS+non-Celltrionsponsoredstudies)–vper100patient-yearsUC:Remicade(RCTs)–vvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-years

Remicade(observational)–vper100patient-yearsCT-P13(PMS+non-Celltrionsponsoredstudies)–vper100-patient-years

6.Surgery:CD:Remicade(RCTs)–vvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-years*Remicade(observational)–vvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsCT-P13(PMS+non-Celltrionsponsoredstudies)–vvvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsUC:Remicade(RCTs)–vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-years*

Remicade(observational)–vvvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsCT-P13(PMS+non-Celltrionsponsoredstudies)–vvvvvvvvvvvvper100-patient-years*DatafromthemajorRCTsofRemicade+otherRCTs

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

21CommonDrugReview November2017

7.Disease-RelatedHospitalization:CD:Remicade(RCT)–vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsRemicade(observational)–vvvvvvvvvvvCT-P13(PMS+non-Celltrionsponsoredstudies)–vvvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsUC:Remicade(RCT)–vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvper100patient-yearsRemicade(observational)–vvvvvvvvvvv

CT-P13(PMS+non-Celltrionsponsoredstudies)–vvvvvvvvvvvvper100-patient-yearsInaddition,safetydatawascollectedfromseveralpost-marketingobservationalstudies.Thesafetypopulationandoutcomesarefurtherdescribedinthesectionsbelow.ForadditionalinformationonthespecificstudiespleaserefertotheClinicalStudyReports(CSRs)includedinthelistedreferences.b) SafetyPopulationsEvaluatedThesafetydatabaseofCT-P13consistsofdatafromthe2ongoingclinicaltrialsconductedwithCT-P13forCDandUC:thePhase4trialCT-P134.1inIBDpatients[15],andtheobservationalPhase4trialCT-P13PMS[9].ThelatterstudyisdescribedindetailinSection4.2.CT-P134.1isasmall(N=20)phaseIV,ongoing(fouryear),open-label,singlearmstudyconductedinadultpatientswithCDorUCinSouthKorea.11Aninterimanalysisofefficacyandsafetyin10patients(vvvvvvvvv)fromvstudycentershasbeenpresented.vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv.AnalysesofthesafetyofCT-P13atdoses>5mg/kgincludeddatafromStudyCT-P13PMSandStudyB2P13111,whichisanExtensionStudyofthePhaseI/IIClinicalStudyofCT-P13inTreatmentofPatientswithRheumatoidArthritis[16].ForStudyCT-P13PMSvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv,thesafetyanalysissetconsistedofallpatientswhoreceivedatleastonedose(fullorpartial)ofthestudytreatmentduringanydosingperiod.Atotalof173IBDpatientshavebeentreatedwithCT-P13inStudyCT-P13PMSand75patientsweretreatedwithdoses>5mg/kg.InStudyB2P13111,vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv.Atotalof71RApatientsweretreatedwithCT-P13.vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv.c) OverviewofSafetyThesafetydatabaseofCT-P13inIBDpatientshasbeenspeciallyevaluatedwithregardtotheidentifiedandpotentialrisksofREMICADE®i.e.,IRRs,infections,inparticularpneumoniaandtuberculosis,andmalignancies.Inaddition,analysesoneventsofsurgeryordisease-relatedhospitalizationhavebeenperformed.Theresultsoftheseanalysesarepresentedinthefollowingsections.Inaddition,thefindingsonIRRs,infections,pneumonia,tuberculosisandmalignanciesfromRCTsconductedwithREMICADE®aswellasfromobservationalstudiesaresummarizedandcomparedwiththesafetydatafromStudyCT-P13PMS,StudyCT-P134.1,andnon-CELLTRIONsponsoredstudies.d) TreatmentEmergentAdverseEvents(TEAS)StudyCT-P13PMS(InterimCSR)Atotalof51TEAEswerereportedin38patients(22.0%).Ofthese,22eventswereconsideredtoberelatedtotreatmentin18patients.TherewasnonotabledifferenceinincidenceofTEAEsbetweeninfliximab-naïveandswitchedpatientswith23.9%and18.3%ofpatientsreportingTEAEs,respectively.MoreTEAEswerereportedbyUCpatientscomparedtoCDpatients;30TEAEsbyUCpatientsand19TEAEsbyCDpatients.PatientswithFCDreported2TEAEs.Themostfrequently(≥5patients)reportedsystemorganclasses(SOCs)includedinfectionsandinfestations(9patients),skinandsubcutaneous

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

22CommonDrugReview November2017

tissuedisorders(8patients),gastrointestinal(GI)disorders(5patients),generaldisordersandadministrationsiteconditions(5patients).MostTEAEswereofmildseverity(10patientsreportedmildTEAEsconsideredrelatedtotreatmentand15patientsreportedmildTEAEsconsideredtobeunrelatedtotreatment);7patientsreportedrelatedmoderateTEAEsandalso7patientsreportedunrelatedmoderateTEAEs.TwoTEAEswereassessedtobeofsevereseverity.InfectionsandGIdisorderswerethemostfrequentlyreportedTEAEs,whichisnotinconsistentwiththesafetyprofileofREMICADE®inIBDpatients.StudyCT-P134.1(InterimCSR)vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvve) DeathsNodeathswerereportedintheinterimCSRsofStudiesCT-P13PMS,vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv.f) TreatmentEmergentSeriousAdverseEvents(TESAEs)StudyCT-P13PMS(InterimCSR)FiveTESAEswerereportedby5(2.9%)patientsinthestudy(CTDModule2.5-12);ofthese,4wereconsideredtoberelatedand1tobeunrelatedtotreatment.TheTESAEswerereportedby4patientsreceiving5mg/kgasmaximumdoseand1patientinthe>5mg/kg-≤7mg/kggroup.TheTESAEsreportedinthestudyareconsistentwiththesafetyprofileofREMICADE®asdescribedintheREMICADE®ProductMonograph[11].NounexpectedTESAEoccurredduringthestudy.StudyCT-P134.1(InterimCSR)vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvg) ReactionsDuetoInfusionoftheStudyDrugsvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv.InStudyCT-P13PMS,atotalof10IRRswerereportedby9IBD(9of173;5.2%)patients,vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv.IntheCDgroup,2patientsreportedIRRs(bothswitchedtoCT-P13)andintheUCgroup8patients(6infliximab-naïve,2switch).NoneofthepatientswithFCDreportedIRRs.FourIRRsledtopermanentdiscontinuationoftreatment.TheincidenceofIRRswasnothigherinthegroupofpatientsreceivingdosesof>5mg/kg(3of71,4.2%)comparedtopatientsreceiving5mg/kgasmaximumdose(6of102,5.9%).InStudyCT-P134.1,2(20%)patientsexperiencedIRRs;1patientexperiencingvomiting(possiblerelated,moderate)andnausea(possiblerelated,moderate)intheCDgroup,1patientreportingskinexfoliation(possible,mild)andrash(probable/likely,mild)intheUCgroup.NoneoftheseIRRsledtodiscontinuationoftreatment.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

23CommonDrugReview November2017

h) InfectionsInStudyCT-P13PMS,atotalof10TEAEsofinfectionswerereportedby9IBDpatients;ofthese,3wereconsideredtoberelatedand6tobeunrelatedtotreatment.The3TEAEsconsideredtoberelatedincluded:1TEAEoftuberculosis(moderate)experiencedbyaFCDpatient,1TEAEofrhinitis(mild)reportedbyatreatment-naïveUCpatient,and1TEAEoflungabscess(moderate)reportedbyatreatment-switchUCpatient.Theeventofrhinitis,however,wasconfirmedtobeanIRRbythesiteinvestigator.TEAEsunrelatedtotreatmentincludedfolliculitis(mild),upperrespiratoryinfections(3mild,2moderate),andurinarytractinfection(moderate).Theincidenceofinfectionswasnothigherinthegroupofpatientsreceivingdosesof>5mg/kg(2of71,2.8%)comparedtopatientsreceiving5mg/kgasmaximumdose(7of102,6.9%).vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvOverall,1caseoftuberculosis(StudyCT-P13PMS)wasreportedinIBDpatients.Forfurtherdetails,refertoCTDModule2.7.4.i) SurgeryNocasesofsurgerywerereportedintheperiodcoveredbythePMSinterimCSR.j) Hospitalization(disease-related)InStudyCT-P13PMS,1treatment-naïvepatientwithCDwashospitalized.NoothercasesofhospitalizationwerereportedintheperiodcoveredbytheinterimCSR[17,Table24].k) Post-marketingDataAspreviouslymentioned,REMSIMA®andINFLECTRA®arethesamemolecule,theinfliximabbiosimilar(CT-P13)manufacturedbyCelltrionHealthcareCorporation,justmarketedanddistributedunderdifferentcommercialnamesindifferentcountries.Assuch,thepostmarketingdataforCT-P13isbasedonboththeperiodicbenefit-riskevaluationreport(PBRER)[18],dated23Mar2015fortheREMSIMA®brandaswellastheperiodicsafetyupdatereport(PSUR)dated29Mar2016fortheINFLECTRA®brand[19]REMSIMA®(infliximab;CT-P13)Thisreportcontainssafetydatafromindividualcasereportsderivedfrompost-marketingspontaneousreporting,publishedliteratureandclinicaltrials,coveringtheperiodfrom20Jul2014to20Jan2015(forfurtherdetails,seeCTDModule2.7.4).vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv.Duringthereportingperiod,nonew,ongoing,orclosedsignalswereidentifiedforinfliximab.Nonewinformationwasreceivedforthepreviouslyidentifiedorpotentialrisksandtherewasnoupdateonmissinginformationduringthisreportingperiod.Therewerenoactionstakenorriskminimizationactivitiesproposedforanysafetyreason.Overall,nosignificantnewsafetyinformationwasidentifiedfromthereviewofworldwidesafetydataduringthereportingperiodthatwouldwarrantchangestotheReferenceSafetyInformationofinfliximab.Thebenefit-riskratioofinfliximabremainsfavorable.ThisreportsummarizesthesafetyinformationreceivedbytheProductSafetyDepartmentofHospira,forINFLECTRA®(infliximab),duringtheperiod21Jul2015to20Jan2016(forfurtherdetails,seethePSURdocumentincludedinthelistedreferences).SourcesofadversereportingdatawithinthisPSURincludespontaneousreports(medicallyconfirmedandnon-medicallyconfirmed),reportsfromregulatory

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

24CommonDrugReview November2017

authorities,reportsfromnon-Hospirasponsoredstudiesornamedpatient/compassionateuseprograms,andtheliterature.vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv.DuringthereportingperiodcoveredbythisPSUR,therewerenoactionstakenwithINFLECTRA®(infliximab)forsafetyreasons,byeithertheRegulatoryAuthoritiesor,byHospiraastheMAHandnochangesintheefficacyofINFLECTRA®(infliximab)werereportedeither.Followingareviewoftheadverseeventinformationreceivedduringthe6monthperiodcoveredbythisreport,therisk-benefitbalanceofINFLECTRA®(infliximab)isconsideredfavorable4.3 PharmacokineticsThePKsimilarityofREMICADE®andCT-P13wasdemonstratedbyaphaseI(CT-P131.1)studyinASpatientswith5mg/kgandaphaseIII(CT-133.1)studyinRApatientswith3mg/kg.ThesestudieswerepresentedanddescribedwithinthepreviousCDRsubmissionforINFLECTRA®.DoseproportionalityofCT−P13intherangeof3−10mg/kgwasanalyzedinaPKmodelingstudytosupportIBDindicationdosingregimen.TheprimaryobjectiveofthisanalysiswastoevaluatethedoseproportionalityofCT−P13basedonthefollowing:pharmacokineticdatafromthephaseIstudy,externalvalidationwithphaseIIIdataandreviewofpreviouspharmacokineticstudiesonREMICADE®.RefertotheCT-P13PKModellingReportforfurtherdetails[20].ThisstudyhasshownthattherearenodifferencesinpharmacokineticparametersbetweenREMICADE®andCT−P13.BothREMICADE®andCT−P13appeartobedoseproportionalinthedoserangeof3−5mg/kgbasedontheexternalvalidation.ThepharmacokineticparametersofREMICADE®areknowntobeproportionaltothedosesgiven(5and10mg/kginpatientswithCD,5,10,and20mg/kginpatientswithRA)inpreviouspharmacokineticsreportsofREMICADE®andCT-P13werelinear(doseproportionalexposure)inourstudiesasobservedinpreviousreports.ForfurtherdiscussiononREMICADE®PKlinearity,pleaserefertoAppendixI.Inaddition,severalnon-sponsoredstudieshaveinvestigatedCT-P13PKinIBDpopulation.Anoverviewofthedataisprovidedbelow.TheObservationalHungarianNationwideIBDStudy[21,22],thatenrolled90CDpatientsand51UCpatientsasofFebruary,15,2015,showedthatforbothCDandUCpatients,troughlevelsincreasedfrompre-dosestatusatweek0toweek2andsubsequentlystabilizedbetweenweeks6and14.Preliminaryresultsthroughinductiontherapymeasuredbyweek14showedtherapeuticallymeaningfulconcentrationsofdrugpresentinpatients.AsimilarstudywasdonebythesamegroupusingREMICADE®[23].TheresultsinthecurrentstudyforCT-P13arecomparabletothosereportedpreviouslyforREMICADE®[22].AcohortstudythatiscurrentlyunderwayinNorway[24,25]hasenrolled44CDpatientsand30UCpatientsasofJanuary,31,2015,including56patientswhowerenaïvetoinfliximabtherapyand18patientswhowereswitchedfromREMICADE®toCT-P13.Themeantroughlevelsatweek14inCDpatientswas7.0mg/L(range:0.0-21.8mg/L),andforUCpatientsitwas6.1mg/L(range:0.0–16.7mg/L)[25].AnotherobservationalstudyfromPraguein140IBDpatientsshowedamediantroughlevelofCT-P13inalltreatment-naïvepatientsof14.8µg/mL(0.9-45.0µg/mL)and8.7µg/mL(0.2-45.0µg/mL)atWeeks2and6,respectively.ThemediantroughlevelofCT-P13inallswitchedpatientswere2.4(0-22.0µg/mL)atbaselineand3.2(0-19.0µg/mL)atweek8afterthefirstinfusion[26].Inconclusion,CT-P13hasdemonstratedalinearandpredictablepharmacokineticprofilethatwashighlysimilartoREMICADE®inmodeling,sponsoredandnon-sponsoredobservationalstudies.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

25CommonDrugReview November2017

4.4 ImmunogenicityImmunogenicitydatawasthoroughlyassessedinthekeypivotalstudiespresentedinthepreviousCDRsubmission(PLANETASandPLANETRAStudies).ThefollowingsectionsummarizesdatarelevanttoCDandUCandbrieflydiscussesimmunogenicitysimilarity.AseriesofstudieswereundertakentoinvestigateifimmunereactivityagainstREMICADE®iscross-reactivewithCT-P13.SerafromIBDpatientswhodevelopedanti-infliximab(ATI)antibodiesfollowingtreatmentwithREMICADE®wereexaminedforcross-reactivitytoCT-P13bycomparisonofantibodytitersusinganELISAassay[27,28].52seraobtainedfrom46IBDpatientsandhealthyindividualsweretested.NoneofthepatientswaseverexposedtoCT-P13.Testingwasperformedbyasensitiveandvalidatedanti-Lambdachainsemi-quantitativeELISA.ATIdetectionforthisassayis2.7µg/ml.WhentestingREMICADE®-sensitizedIBDsera,therewasstrongcorrelationbetweentitersofATIreactivetoEU-approvedREMICADE®andtitersofATIcross-reactivewithUSapprovedREMICADE®andCT-P13inpatientsneverexposedtoUSapprovedREMICADE®ortoCT-P13.Thesesimilarcross-reactivityresultspointtosharedimmuno-dominantepitopesonREMICADE®andCT-P13.Whilstthesereassuringdataweregeneratedinvitro,theysupportthenotionthattheimmunogenicpotentialofREMICADE®andCT-P13andthecharacteristicsofcross-reactivitywithclinicallyrelevantanti-drugantibodies(ADA)inIBDpatientsaresimilarandwilltranslateintosimilarimmunogenicityfeaturesinclinicalsettings.AnothercohortexperiencefundedbytheNorwegianGovernmentisbeingconductedtoaccumulateexperiencewithCT-P13inNorwayfollowingproductlaunchinJanuary2014.ThisNor-Switchstudyisanongoingrandomized,double-blind,parallelgroupstudywith500patientsacrossallindications[24].vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvInHungary,aprospective,multicenter,observationalcohortwasdesignedtoexaminethesafetyandefficacyofCT-P13inclinicalresponseandtheinductionandmaintenanceofremissioninCDandUC[29],[21].vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv.TABLE4:VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV

TheimmunogenicityintermsofADApositivityresultsobtainedbyCELLTRION from Studies CT-P131.1and CT-P133.1(whichpreviouslypresentedanddescribedinthepreviousCDRSubmissionforINFLECTRA®) are in line with those reported in theliteratureindicatingthatthestateofthearttestmethodologyappliedinCT-P13studiesprovidesresultsinlinewiththoseoftheassaysemployedinthemorerecentlyreportedstudies.TheuseofconcomitantMTXandotherimmunomodulatorytherapiesisknowntodifferbetweenapprovedconditions.Nevertheless, it isevidentthattheASandRApatientpopulationsrepresentsensitivepopulationsinwhichtocompareimmunogenicityofCT-P13andREMICADE®.Theimmunogenicityinotherpopulations(PsO,PsA,CDandUC)isnotlikelytodifferfromthelevelsobservedinASandRApatientssincetheuseofMTXiseitherlesscommon(PsO,CDandUC)

vvvvvvvv vvvvv vvvvv vvvvvv

vvv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvv

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

26CommonDrugReview November2017

oroptionallyindicated(PsA)andthereforeapproximatetoconditionstestedintheCT-P13clinicalprogram.Overall,theresultsoftheimmunogenicityassessmentofthestudiesconductedwithCT-P13showthattheproportionofpatientsdevelopingADAswhiletreatedwithCT-P13issimilartothatforthosetreatedwithREMICADE®.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

27CommonDrugReview November2017

5. CRITICALAPPRAISALOFCLINICALSTUDIES

5.1 InternalValidityMostclinicalevidencecurrentlyavailabletoevaluatetheefficacyandsafetyofCT-P13forCDorUCcomesfromobservationalstudies(Celltrion-sponsoredstudies,non–Celltrion-sponsoredstudies,andpost-marketingdata).OneRCT(CT-P133.4)comparedCT-P13withthereferenceproduct,Remicade,inadultswithCD.TheobservationalstudiesofCT-P13inCDorUCareallsinglearmwithoutdirectcomparisonswithRemicade.OnlynaiveindirectcomparisonsofsafetyendpointsandsomeefficacyendpointswithRemicadeareavailablefromthemanufacturer’ssystematicreview10andmanufacturer-submitteddatatoHealthCanada.{20}TheabsenceofrandomizedtrialsintheclinicalbodyofevidenceforCT-P13inboweldiseasesmakesitdifficulttoascribeanyobservedimprovementsinefficacy,oranyapparentmaintenanceoftreatmenteffect,totheintervention.Inaddition,thedegreeofsimilarityinefficacy,safety,andimmunogenicitybetweenCT-P13andRemicadehaveyettobeclearlydelineatedwithexperimentaltrials.Inthediscussionbelow,specificcriticalappraisalpointsareprovidedforthestudyCT-P13PMS,asthiswasthekeyclinicalstudypresentedinthemanufacturer’ssubmission.CT-P13PMSisanongoing(fouryear)phaseIV,open-label,singlearmstudyofCT-P13forallapprovedindicationsinSouthKorea.AninterimanalysiswasconductedinadultswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveCD(N=83),FCD(N=12),andUC(N=78)across15studycentresinSouthKoreawithfollow-upof30weeks.Ofthe173patients,113weretreatment-naivetoinfliximaband60wereswitchedtoCT-P13fromthereferenceproduct,Remicade.CT-P13wasadministeredevery8weeks(±5days)afterinductiontherapyofthree5mg/kgdosesatweeks0,2,and6.Mostpatients(59.0%)receiveddosesof5mg/kg.Higherdosesof5mg/kgto10mg/kgwereadministeredto41%ofpatientswithaflexibletitrationschedule.Themajorityofpatientsreceivedatleastthreedosesoftreatmentduringasixweekinductionperiod(90.3%oftreatment-naiveand86.7%oftreatment-switch).Amongtreatment-naiveandtreatment-switchpatients,52.2%and11.7%respectivelyreacheddose6atweek30.TheefficacyanalysissetconsistedofpatientswhoreceivedatleastonedoseofCT-P13andhadatleastoneassessmentfollowingbaseline(N=145,83.8%).MissingdatawereimputedusingLOCF.Allpatientswereincludedinsafetyanalyses.ThemanufacturersubmitteddatatoHealthCanadasuggestingsimilarefficacyforclinicalresponseandremissioninCDandUCandmucosalhealinginUCatweeks14and30betweenCT-P13PMSandhistoricalRemicadedata.{20}TheinternalvalidityofCT-P13PMSislimitedbecauseofitsnon-comparative,open-labelstudydesign.ThemagnitudeofimprovementinefficacyoutcomesduetoCT-P13administrationincomparisonwithRemicadeisunknownwithoutacomparatorgroup.Also,confounders,suchasvariationsinsymptomsovertimeandtheeffectofconcomitanttreatments,couldnotbeadjustedforwithanon-comparativestudydesign.Theabsenceofblindingmayhaveinfluencedtheassessmentofsubjectivecomponentsofthescoringtools,suchasseverityofabdominalpainandgeneralwell-beingoftheCDAIandphysician’sglobalassessmentoftheMayoscore.Thesamplesizeisrelativelysmall,withatotalof83patientswithCD,12withFCD,and78withUC.Whenanalyseswerestratifiedaccordingtotreatment-naiveorswitchstatus,samplesizesbecameevensmallermakingitdifficulttodrawconclusions(e.g.,inFCD,only8patientsweretreatment-naiveand4patientstreatment-switch).PatientswhoreceivedatleastonedoseofCT-P13butwhodidnothaveatleastonepost-baselineefficacyassessment(n=28,16.2%)wereexcludedfromefficacyanalyses.Ofthe

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

28CommonDrugReview November2017

28patientsexcludedfromefficacyanalyses,8discontinuedtreatmentforthefollowingreasons:lackofefficacyandswitchtoanothertreatment(n=2),experienceofanAE(n=4),losstofollow-up(n=1),andpregnancy(n=1).13Thecompletecaseanalysesshowedthataconsiderablenumberofpatientswerenotevaluatedatfollow-upvisits(e.g.,only14/39and20/39patientswhowereinfliximab-naivewithCDwereevaluatedatweeks14and30respectively;only44/54and23/43patientswhowereinfliximab-naivewithUCwereevaluatedatweeks14and30respectively).Missingdata(excludingthe16.2%ofpatientswhowereexcludedfromtheefficacyset)wereimputedusingLOCFandthemanufacturerpresentedanalysesshowingsimilarresultsforclinicalresponseandremissioninCDandUCusingcompletecaseandLOCFmethods.2ThemethodofimputingdatausingLOCF,however,mayoverestimatetreatmentbenefitifpatientswithdrewfromthestudybecausetheyexperiencedworseningofoutcomes.TheLOCFimputationwillassumethatpatientswhowithdrewremainedconstantinoutcomemeasuresfromthepointofwithdrawalandworseninginoutcomes,ifpresent,wouldnotbecaptured.WhiletheefficacyoutcomesassessedbythestudywereappropriatebasedontypicaloutcomesevaluatedintrialsofCDandUC(i.e.,clinicalresponsedefinedbyCDAI,numberofdrainingfistulas,Mayoscore,clinicalremission,endoscopicmucosalhealingforUC,diseasecontrolforpatientswhoswitchedfromreferenceproduct,andneedforrescuemedication)andthethresholdsusedtodefineclinicalresponseandremissionwereappropriate,14dataareabsentforotherimportantoutcomesofIBD.Theseotheroutcomesincludeextra-intestinalmanifestations,diseasebiomarkers(e.g.,C-reactiveprotein,fecalcalprotectin),qualityoflife,andimmunogenicity.Certainnon-Celltrionsponsoredstudiesprovideddataondiseasebiomarkers,butaresimilarlylimitedbyobservational,singlearmdesigns.Thefollow-upperiodof30weeksisalsotooshorttoadequatelyevaluatesomeoutcomes,suchastheneedforsurgeryandmortality.CT-P13PMSpresentspreliminary,interimresultsand,therefore,longer-termfollow-upisneededtoassessifefficacyandsafetyoutcomesremainstable.Qualityoflife,concernaboutdiseaseflare-ups,anxietyandstress,andcaregiverburdenhavebeenidentifiedbypatientsasimportantconcernsandtheimpactofCT-P13ontheseaspectsofdiseasearecurrentlyunknown(Appendix3).5.2ExternalValidity TheprimarylimitationwithrespecttotheexternalvalidityofCT-P13PMSisthedifficultyindirectlyapplyingtheresultsobservedinpatientswithIBDfromKoreatotheCanadianpopulation,duetodifferencesindietandmicrobiotabetweenthecountries.ThesamplepopulationofCT-P13PMSwerefromstudycentresinSouthKorea.Ofthetreatment-naivepatients,themeanage(standarddeviation[SD])was38.9(14.7)years(CD:31.8years,FCD:27.9years,UC:45.2years).Oftreatment-switchpatients,themeanage(SD)was34.3(12.4)years(CD:31.1years,FCD:33.0years,UC:42.9years).Mostpatientshadmoderatelytoseverelyactivedisease,althoughtherewerealsopatientswithCDAIscores<220orpartialMayoscore<6,whichindicatelowerdiseaseseverity.3Femalesappearedtobeunderrepresentedinthestudy(29.2%amongtreatment-naiveand40%amongtreatment-switchpatients).EstimatesofprevalenceofIBDbysexvaryamongstudiesandbyregion.InEuropeanandNorthAmericanpopulations,female-maledistributionhasbeenfoundtorangefromequalto2.5:1.15TherearespecialdiseaseandmanagementconsiderationsofIBDrelevantparticularlytofemales,suchasahigherincidenceofextra-intestinalmanifestationsobservedinwomen,whichwerenotaddressedbythisstudy.16

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

29CommonDrugReview November2017

TheadministereddoseofCT-P13wasinaccordancewiththedosingrecommendationsofinfliximabforCDandUC.CT-P13wasgivenintravenouslystartingwiththreedosesofinductionof5mg/kgatweeks0,2,and6,andthen5mg/kgevery8weeksthereafter.Forpatientswithincompleteresponse,thedosewasincreasedupto10mg/kg.Themajority(89.0%)completedthe3dosesofinductiontherapy.However,only66(38.2%)completed6dosesoftreatmentbyweek30.Morepatientsinthetreatment-naivegroup(59/113,52.2%)received6dosescomparedwiththetreatment-switchgroup(7/60,11.7%).Themanufacturerexplainedthatthelargediscrepancyinreaching6dosesamongtreatment-naiveandtreatment-switchgroupswasduetodifferencesinintervalsbetweendosesratherthananysafetyconcerns.Treatment-naivepatientsweregiventhreedosesofinductionwithin6weeks;whereas,switchpatientsreceivedeachdoseatapproximately8-weekintervalsand,therefore,theswitchgroupgenerallytookbeyond30weeks(mean:34.5±8.1weeks)toreachdose6.{20}The5mg/kgdosewasreceivedbythemajorityofpatients(59%)and41%receiveddosesof5mg/kgto10mg/kg.Thestudypopulationincludedthosewhoweretreatment-naive(113/173,65.3%)andtreatment-switchfromthereferenceproduct(60/173,34.7%).Patientswereallowedtoreceivepremedicationsofanalgesics(acetaminophen),antihistamines(chlorpheniramine,piprinhydrinate),orcorticosteroids(hydrocortisone,dexamethasone,methylprednisolone)beforeorduringCT-P13infusion.Atleast1premedicationwasadministeredto49/173(28.3%)patients.Thefollowingconcomitantmedicationswerepermitted:acetaminophen,5-ASAwithnoincreaseindoseallowed,corticosteroids,othertopicalorsystemictreatmentsforUC,andantibioticsforIBD.RescuemedicationsweredefinedasinitiationofconcomitantmedicationafterthefirstinfusiondatetotreatneworunresolvedsymptomsofCDorUCandwereadministeredifneeded.Drugsadministeredwereantidiarrheals,intestinalanti-inflammatory/anti-infectives(e.g.,sulfasalazine),systemiccorticosteroids,andimmunosuppressants(azathioprine).Rescuemedicationwasadministeredto48/173(27.7%)ofpatients.Theinclusionoftreatment-naiveandtreatment-switchpatientsandtheadministrationofpremedicationsand/orrescuemedicationsalongwithCT-P13arereflectiveofclinicalpractice.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

30CommonDrugReview November2017

6. EXTRAPOLATIONOFINDICATIONS

6.1 Manufacturer’sRationaleforExtrapolationThedatatosupporttheIBDindicationisbasedonthetotalityofevidencecollectedfromthequality,non-clinical,andclinicalcomparabilityexercise.ApositionpaperpreparedbyCELLTRIONtosupportextrapolationinIBDissummarizedinthefollowingsections.RefertoCT-P13ExtrapolationPositionPaperwhichwassubmittedtoHealthCanada[30]forcompletedetails.a) Pathophysiology–Crohn’sDisease/UlcerativeColitisTNFαisapleiotropiccytokinewithnumerousbiologicalfunctions[31][30]andhasbeenshowntobecriticalinthepathogenesisofIBD[30,page26].BothCDandUCarechronicinflammatorydisordersthatarecharacterizedbyadysregulatedmucosalimmuneresponse.InCD,inflammationistypicallyseenthroughouttheintestinalwall;whereasinUC,inflammationistypicallyrestrictedtosuperficialtissuese.g.thelaminapropria.InIBDpatients,immunecellspresentattheinflammationsitewillleadtoanoverproductionofTNFα[32,33].MucosalinflammationinthesmallandlargeintestineduetoIBDisaccompaniedbybarrierdysfunctionwhichleadstotwomainconsequences.First,smallsolutesandwatercanflowintothelumenandcauseleakfluxdiarrhea.Secondly,largermoleculesandevenmicroflora,whichundernormalconditionseitherdonotorcrosstheepithelialbarriertoonlyasmalldegree,allowingforimmunetoleranceinduction.TNFαsignalingisalsoimplicatedinmucosaldamage,aswellasinthedevelopmentofulcersandfistulasviathestimulationofmyofibroblasts[34].MyofibroblastsareknowntocausedamagetostructuresoftheGItractbysecretingmatrixmetalloproteinases(MMPs).TheexpressionofMMPsisincreasedintheinflamedgutandhighlevelsofMMPshavebeenassociatedwithmucosaldegradation,ulcerationandfistulas[34].AsincreasedlevelsofTNFαarealsopresentintheinflamedgut,andmyofibroblastsareknowntobesensitivetopro-inflammatorycytokines,TNFαhasbeenproposedtobetheinitiatingfactorthatdrivestheincreaseinMMPs.Thissequenceofeventshasrecentlybeenconfirmedby[35]whohaveshownthatTNFαisabletoincreasetheexpressionofMMP-3inhumancolonicmyofibroblasts.TheroleofTNFαisalsorelatedtotheinductionoflocallyandsystemicallyproducedpro-inflammatorycytokines,increasingepithelialapoptosisandalteringT-cellregulationviareversesignalingpathways[36],[37].DamagetoepithelialcellsbydirecteffectofcytokinessuchasTNFαvianecrosisorapoptosiscancontributetothelossofepithelialbarrier.Indeed,therearesignificantchangesinepithelialtightjunctionstructureandfunction,notonlyinCDbutalsoinUC.Inaddition,therateofapoptosiswasalsofoundtobeupregulatedinUC,therebycontributingtothebarrierdefect.Interestingly,innon-IBDformsofcolitis,suchascollagenouscolitis,therateofmucosalapoptosisisnotaltered[38].Additionally,inhibitoryimpactofTNFαandothercytokinesonapoptosisofTlymphocytesresidinginlaminapropriacancontributetoimmunedysregulationandperpetualmucosalinflammation[38-40].Also,researchintogranulomashasprovidedfurtherevidencefortheroleofTNFαinpromotinginflammationinCD.Granulomasconsistofaggregatesofmacrophages,andassuchrepresentaspecializedtypeofinflammation.Theyappeartoformaroundforeignbodiesthattheimmunesystemisunabletoeliminate.GranulomasarecommonlyfoundinbiopsysamplesfrompatientswithCDandtheformationofthesecellularstructureshasbeenshowntoberegulatedbycomplexinteractionsbetweenTlymphocytesandmacrophagesandtobedependentuponTNFαsignaling[41][30,page27][42].Inconclusion,TNFαisimplicatedinthechronicinflammationinCDandUCandisalsoassociatedwithmucosaldegradation,ulcerationandfistulasinCD[30,page27-29][42,page165].TheprolongedexpressionofTNFαobservedinIBDanditspivotalroleinthepro-inflammatorycytokinecascade

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

31CommonDrugReview November2017

indicatethatTNFαisamajordrivingfactorofchronicinflammationinCDandUC[30,page27][42],page164.b) MechanismofactionofinfliximabInfliximabisachimericIgG1mAbcomposedofavariablemurineFabregionlinkedtoahumanIgG1κconstantregion.InfliximabcanbindtoboththemonomerandtrimerformsofsTNFα[43].ThehighaffinitythatinfliximabdisplaystowardssTNFαsupportsitsuseininflammatorydiseasessuchasRA,PsA,ASandPsO,UCandCDinwhichsTNFαsignalingthroughbindingtoTNFR1andTNFRplaysadominantroleinthepathogenesisofthecondition[44][42,page167].InfliximabexertsitseffectintheameliorationofinflammatorydiseasessuchasCDandUCaswellasRA,AS,PsA,PsOthroughanumberofmechanismsofaction.ThesehavebeenevaluatedintheoriginalNDSincomparisonwiththereferenceproduct.TheywerealsoevaluatedinthesupplementalNewDrugSubmission(sNDS)withinthe3waysimilaritystudiesasdescribedinSection4.1.1. BindingandNeutralizationofSolubleTNFαpreventingitsbindingtoTNFRsandresultingin

blockingsTNFαinducedinflammatoryactivitiesincluding:• Inductionofpro-inflammatorycytokinessuchasinterleukins(IL-1andIL-6)[45]• Enhancementofleukocytemigrationbyincreasingendotheliallayerpermeabilityand

expressionofadhesionmoleculesbyendothelialcellsandleukocytes[46,47]• Activationofneutrophilandeosinophilfunctionalactivity[47-50]• InductionofacutephasereactantssuchasC-reactiveproteinandotherliverproteins[44],as

wellastissuedegradingenzymesproducedbysynoviocytesand/orchondrocytes[51]• Inductionofapoptosisoftissuecellssuchasintestinalepithelialcells[52]throughtheactivityof

sTNFαontheTNFR1receptor[30,page34].2. BindingtoTransmembraneTNFαbyInfliximab:InfliximabisabletobindtotmTNFαlocatedonthe

surfaceofvariouscelltypes.Thisresultsinanumberofeffectsthatinclude:• BlockingtheinteractionoftmTNFαwithTNFRs• Stimulationofreversesignalingpathwaysresultinginsuppressionofsecretionofpro-

inflammatorycytokinessuchasIL-1,IL-10andIL-12frommonocytes[53,54]• Inductionofregulatorymacrophages[55,56]• Stimulationofapoptosisinmonocytes[57]andTcells[58]

3. InductionofRegulatoryMacrophagesandWoundHealing:Macrophagesarepresentinallphasesofadultwoundhealing,andcontributetoinflammation,granulationtissueformation,andmatrixdeposition.Bothpro-inflammatory"M1"macrophagesandanti-inflammatoryorregulatory"M2"macrophagesexist.Pro-inflammatory"M1"macrophagesareproducedbyexposuretoIFN-γandTNFα[59]andsotheirproductionisinhibitedbyanti-TNFagentssuchasinfliximab.InIBDpatients,ithasbeenshownthatlaminapropriamacrophagesarepredominantlyoftheinflammatoryorM1phenotype[60,61].Theanti-inflammatoryM2phenotypeincludesM2a,theregulatorymacrophageswhichareactivatedbyIL-4andIL-13;theotherM2phenotypesareM2bandM2c[62].HencetheratioofM1andM2phenotypesarethoughttobeofimportanceintheetiologyofIBD.“Regulatory”macrophageshavealsobeentermed"woundhealing"macrophages[63],“AlternativelyActivatedMacrophages”[62]and“Mφ2”macrophages[56].RegulatorymacrophageshavebeenshowntoinhibitTcellproliferationviacellcontactand/orthereleaseofsolublemediators[56].

4. Complement-DependentCytotoxicity(CDC):FollowingbindingtotmTNFαonthecellsurface,infliximabmayinducecytotoxicityofthetmTNFαexpressingcellviacomplementactivation[58,64].InfliximabisoftheIgG1classandthereforecanbindcomplementC1q.Activationofthe

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

32CommonDrugReview November2017

complementcascadecanprotectagainstinfectionbutininflammatorydiseasescouldcontributetothepathology.ComplementcomponentscaninduceCDCoftargetcellsresultingincelllysis.

5. Antibody-dependentcellularcytotoxicity(ADCC):ADCCistheimmunedefensemechanismswherebyimmuneeffectorcells(e.g.macrophagesorNK)bindtotheFcregiononantibody-antigencomplexesonthesurfaceoftargetcellsandtherebyactivelypromotetargetcelllysis.Antibody-dependentcell-mediatedcytotoxicityismediatedprimarilythroughasetofcloselyrelatedFcreceptorswhichhavebothactivatingandinhibitoryactivities,withFcγIIIabeingparticularlyimportantinthisrespect.Inconclusion,alltheknownputativemechanismofactionsattributedtoinfliximabhasbeenstudied,andsimilaritytothereferenceproductwasdemonstrated.MinordifferenceswereobservedincertainassaysforADCCactivitythatwerenotdeemedtobeclinicallyrelevant.PleaseseebelowasummarydiscussionoftheADCCevaluation.

c) JustificationofExtrapolation-QualityattributesandBiologicactivityCelltrionhaspresentedtheresultsofthe2-waysimilaritystudiescomparingCT-P13withEU-approvedREMICADE®intheoriginalCDRsubmission.InsupportoftheIBDindication;CELLTRIONhasperformedadditionallargenumberandwiderangeoforthogonal,highlysensitivemethodstoprovideameaningfulfinger-print-likealgorithmtoassesssimilaritybetweenCT-P13,EUandUSapprovedREMICADE®.TheresultsarehighlightedinSection4.1aboveandfurtherdetailsareprovidedinAppendix1.ThecomprehensiveanalyseshaveshownthatCT-P13issimilartoREMICADE®inprimarystructure,higherorderstructure,aggregateandmonomericpurity,andpost-translationalmodificationsnotwithstandingminordifferencesthathavebeendemonstratedtohavenoclinicallymeaningfulimpactonsafety,purityorpotency.TheextensiverangesofinvitroandexvivobiologicalassayshavedemonstratedsimilarbiologicalactivitiesforCT-P13andREMICADE®inassaysmimickingthemechanismsofactionofinfliximabinCDandUC[30,page71].BiologicActivityManyinvitrostudiesreportedintheliterature,havefoundthatinfliximabcaninduceADCCbutallthesestudiesemployengineeredTNFα-overexpressingcelllinesastargetcells[53,58,65].NotablyinfliximabisnotobservedtoinduceADCCinasystemcomprisedofnaturallyderivedcells.Specifically,whenlipopolysaccharide(LPS)stimulatedhumanmonocytesareusedastargetcellsandPBMCasasourceofeffectorcells,noobservableADCCisseeninresponsetoinfliximab[66].ThesefindingshavebeenreplicatedvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvwithpurifiedNKcellsassourceofeffectorcells.SinceLPSstimulatedhumanmonocytesareconsideredrepresentativeofthetargetcellsencounteredinvivointheintestineswheremonocytes/macrophagesareexpectedtobestimulatedbytheLPSpresentonthesurfaceofcommensalbacteria,theseresultssuggestthatADCCisnotlikelytoplayasignificantroleinmediatingthetherapeuticeffectofanti-TNFtherapiesinCDandUC.Interestingly,applyingtheexactsameexperimentalsystembutreplacingactivatedmonocytesasthetargetwithgeneticallyengineeredJurkatcellswhichoverexpressTNFαontheirsurfacecellbyapproximately25folddoesinducemeasurableADCCactivityusinginfliximab.

FurtherevidencethatADCCmaynotplayacriticalroleinefficacyofinfliximabinCDisprovidedbyanalysisoftherapeuticeffectofinfliximabinpatientsofdifferentFcγRIIIagenotypefollowingtreatment,asthebindingaffinityofFcγRIIIaV/VisotypeforFcregionofmonoclonalantibodiesishigherthanthatofthelowaffinityF/Fisotype.ForCD,publisheddatafromseverallargestudies[67-70]shownoassociationbetweenFcγRIIIagenotypeandclinicalresponsetoinfliximabandotherTNFα-antagonists.Althoughdifferenceswerenotedinbiologicalresponse(C-reactiveproteinlevels)intheearlyphasesof

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

33CommonDrugReview November2017

treatmentinseveralCDstudies,thiseffectdidnotpersisttolaterphasesoftreatment,andnodifferencesweredetectedinclinicaloutcome[68,71].

d) JustificationofExtrapolation—PharmacokineticsSimilarityhasbeendemonstratedbetweenCT-P13andREMICADE®withrespecttoPKparametersinASpatientsandRApatients.Also,itseemsscientificallyjustifiedtoextrapolatePKprofilesforCT-P13acrossthedifferenttargetpopulationsgiventhattheCT-P13clinicalstudiesshowsimilarPKpropertiesacrossASpatientsandRApatientsaswellasbetweensingleandrepeatdosing;theappropriatenessoftheextrapolationisfurthersupportedbypublisheddataforREMICADE®showingnomajordifferencesinhalf-life,clearance,volumeofdistributionandotherPKparametersbetweenpatientsubgroupsandacrossalllicensedpopulations[30,pages72-80].Furthermore,thereal-worldexperiencewithCT-P13fromthesponsoredKoreanPMSstudyandnon-sponsoredHungarianNationwideIBDStudy[21],vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv.

e) JustificationofExtrapolation—EfficacyandSafetyTheKoreanPMSstudyhasdemonstratedthatCT-P13issafeandeffectiveinpatientswithCD,UCandFCD.InlinewithpublisheddataonREMICADE®,CT-P13hasdemonstratedefficacyintermsofclinicalandendoscopicresponseandremission,fistula-closingandmucosalhealingeffects.Therewerenonewsafetysignalsreportedinthisstudy(pleaserefertoSection4.2aboveforfurtherdetails).

f) JustificationofExtrapolation—ImmunogenicityTheimmunogenicitywithCT-P13andREMICADE®acrossCT-P13clinicalstudieswassimilarinbothRAandASpatients.IncidenceratesofADAsandneutralizingantibodylevelsandtitervaluesweresimilarincontrolledstudiesupto1year.TheratesofIRRsbetweenCT-P13andREMICADE®werealsosimilar.TheefficacywassustainedandthepatternofefficacyandsafetyamongstADA-positiveandADA-negativepatientsweresimilarbetweenCT-P13andREMICADE®.ADAdatainIBDpatientsarenotavailable,howeverlowratesofIRRswereobservedinpost-marketingIBDstudieswithCT-P13.Furthermoreinvitrocross-reactivitydatawithCT-P13andREMICADE®againstserafromADA-positiveIBDpatientsareavailable(pleaserefertoSection4.3aboveforfurtherdetails).Overall,similarandconsistentimmunogenicityprofilewithCT-P13hasbeendemonstratedagainstREMICADE®intwodistinctpatientpopulations.

g) ClinicalDevelopmenttoSupportDoseAdjustmentRecommendationsIntheREMICADE®productmonograph,thereistheoptionforadultpatientswithCDwhorespondtoinfliximabandthenlosetheirresponsetouseanescalateddoseof10mg/kg.ClinicaldatainIBDpatientstreatedwithCT-P13indosesupto10mg/kgwithintheKoreanPMSstudyvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvhavebeencollected.vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv.Overall,theefficacyaccordingtoresponseandsafetyofCT-P13administeredathigherdosestovvvvvIBDpatientsappearedtobesatisfactory,vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv[30,page104].

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

34CommonDrugReview November2017

ConclusionInsummary,CELLTRIONhasdemonstratedcleartherapeuticcomparabilitybetweenCT-P13andREMICADE®inRAwithsupportiveclinicaldatainASpatients.Inaddition,basedonanextensiveanalysisofthetotality-of-the-evidenceconsideringmechanismsofaction,structuralanalysis,functionalassaysandthesimilarityofpharmacokinetics,efficacy,safetyandimmunogenicity,combinedwithdatafrompost-marketingstudiesCELLTRIONconsidersthatthereissufficientscientificevidencetosupportextrapolationoftheCT-P13toCDandUCindicationsforwhichREMICADE®isregisteredinCanada.Asimilarsafetyprofilewasdemonstratedinatotalofapproximately1,000patientsexposedtotrialmedicationofwhichnearly500receivedCT-P13foruptotwoyearsorforayearfollowingtransitionfromREMICADE®.Additionallysafetydataareavailablefrom518CDandUCpatientswhohavereceivedCT-P13.ThesedatashowingeneralahighlysimilarsafetyprofiletoREMICADE®acrossallofthesepopulations.ImmunogenicityhasbeenshowntobehighlysimilarintwodifferenttherapeuticsettingsnamelyRAandAScoveringtheeffectoftwodifferentdoses(3and5mg/kg)andtheimpactofthepresenceorabsenceofMTX.Cross-reactivitystudiesandsomelimitedexperiencewithimmunogenicityevaluationinCT-P13ofREMICADE®.6.2 HealthCanada’sConclusiononExtrapolationAtthetimeoftheCDRsubmission,theIBDsNDSwasunderreviewbytheBiologicGeneticsTherapiesDirectorate.InJune2016,HealthCanadaauthorizedtheuseofCT-P13fortheIBDindicationsbasedonextrapolationfrompreviouslysubmittedclinicalstudiesinpatientswithRAandAS,comparablepharmacokinetics,andnewlysubmittedphysiochemicalandbiologicaldata.1WhentheNDSwasfiledtoHealthCanadain2012,marketauthorizationwasrequestedforalloftheindicationscurrentlyauthorizedforREMICADE®includingCDandUC.ThefollowingsectionistakenfromtheHealthCanadaSummaryBasisofDecisionforINFLECTRA®[72].“ComparabilitybetweenINFLECTRA®andthereferenceproductwasestablishedbasedoncomparativechemistryandmanufacturingstudies,andcomparativenon-clinicalstudies.Comparativepharmacokineticstudiesandclinicalstudiesinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisorankylosingspondylitispatientsdidnotidentifyclinicallymeaningfuldifferences.Fortheremainingindicationsanduses,extrapolationwasrequired.Theindicationsforpsoriaticarthritisandplaquepsoriasisweregrantedonthebasisofsimilarityandtheabsenceofmeaningfuldifferences,betweenINFLECTRA®andthereferenceproduct,inproductquality,mechanismofaction,diseasepathophysiology,safetyprofile,anddosageregimenandonclinicalexperiencewiththereferenceproduct.However,extrapolationtoindicationsandusespertainingtoCDandUCcouldnotberecommendedduetodifferencesbetweenINFLECTRA®andthereferenceproductthatcouldhaveanimpactontheclinicalsafetyandefficacyoftheseproductsintheseindications.Thisarosefromtheobserveddifferencesinthelevelofafucosylation,FcγRIIIareceptorbinding,andsomeinvitroAntibody-DependentCell-MediatedCytotoxicity(ADCC)assays.ItwasconcludedthatdifferencesintheabilityofthetwoproductstoinduceADCCcouldnotberuledout.Therefore,sincedifferencesinADCChavebeenobservedbetweenthetwoproductsandbecauseADCCmaybeanactivemechanismofactionforinfliximabinthesettingofIBD,extrapolationfromthesettingsofrheumatoidarthritisandankylosingspondylitistoIBDcouldnotberecommendedduetotheabsenceofclinicalstudiesinIBD.”Pleaseseeabove,Section6.1,forasummaryofdatathathassincebeensubmittedaspartofasNDSfortheIBDindicationstoaddressthepotentialissuesraisedbyHealthCanada.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

35CommonDrugReview November2017

6.3 InternationalRegulatoryConclusionsonExtrapolationEuropeanMedicineAgency(EMA)TheEMAapprovedCT-P13(INFLECTRA®)fortheIBDindicationsviaextrapolationin2013.AspertheEMACommitteeforMedicinalProductsinHumanUseAssessmentReportforINFLECTRA®[73,page96]:“Inconclusion,byusingarangeofexperimentalmodelsthatareconsideredrepresentativeofthepathophysiologicalconditionsandputativemechanismsofactionofinfliximab,theApplicanthasprovidedconvincingevidencethatthedifferencedetectedintheamountofafucosylatedspecieshasnoclinicallyrelevantimpactontheefficacyandsafetyofCT-P13,inparticularinIBD.AdditionalinvitrodatafromhumanintestinalcellsarefurthersupportingextrapolationoftheclinicaldatatoIBD.”FoodandDrugAdministration(FDA)CT-P13hasbeenapprovedbytheFDAforallindications,includingCDandUCviaextrapolation[74].ThisfollowstherecommendationfromtheUSArthritisAdvisoryCommitteewhichrecommendedtheapprovalofCDandUCviaextrapolationofdata.AsperFDABriefingDocument,[75,pages70-72]:“ExtrapolationofDatatoSupportBiosimilarityinInflammatoryBowelDisease(IBD)Indications:CelltrionprovidedexperimentaldatasupportingaconclusionthatCT-P13andUS-licensedREMICADE®arehighlysimilarbasedonextensivestructuralandfunctionalanalyticalcharacterization.Further,CelltrionaddressedeachoftheknownandpotentialmechanismsofactionofUS-licensedREMICADE®.Asnoted,thereweresmalldifferencesbetweenCT-P13,US-licensedREMICADE®,andEU-approvedREMICADE®inglycosylation(a-fucosylation),FcγRIIIbinding,andsomeNK-basedADCCassays.InconsideringwhethertheapparentfractionalFcγRIIIbinding/ADCCdifferencesmaytranslateintoaclinicallymeaningfuldifferenceinIBD,theAgencyhasconsideredthefollowing:• ThebiologicalfunctionsthatthesubtleFcγRIIIbindingdifferencesmightimpact,namelyADCC,are

withinthequalityrangeofCelltrion’sdataonthereferenceproduct.• ThemechanismofactionofTNFinhibitorsintreatingIBDiscomplexand,ADCCisonlyoneofthe

severalplausiblemechanismsofaction.ItisnoteworthythatproductswithoutanyADCCcapabilityhavebeenapprovedforthetreatmentofpatientswithCD(i.e.certolizumab),whilethepossibleADCCdifferencebetweenCT-P13andUS-licensedREMICADE®issmall.CelltrionhasalsoprovideddatatodemonstrateanalyticalsimilarityinalltheotherpotentialmechanismsofactionofinfliximabinIBD.

• ThehistoricalIBDclinicaltrialdesign,includingthoseforREMICADE®,oftenutilizeddosesandtimingofprimaryendpointassessmentsthatareinthetherapeuticplateau,andthusclinicaloutcomemeasures(e.g.,clinicaleffectofsmalldifferencesinADCCandFcγRIIIbinding.

Therefore,basedontheaboveconsiderations,itisreasonabletoextrapolateconclusionsregardingsimilarefficacyandsafetyofCT-P13andUS-licensedREMICADE®toIBD.Inaggregate,theevidenceindicatesthattheextrapolationofbiosimilaritytotheindicationsforwhichCelltrionisseekinglicensure(PsA,PsO,adultandpediatricCD,andadultandpediatricUC),maybescientificallyjustified.”AustralianTherapeuticGoodsAdministration(TGA)TheTGA,afterevaluationfromtheAdvisoryCommitteeonPrescriptionMedicines(ACPM),approvedandregisteredINFLECTRA®forboththeCDandUCindicationsviaextrapolationinAugust2015.AsperaPublicSummaryDocument:

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

36CommonDrugReview November2017

“TheACPMhasstatedthereweresufficientdatatodeclareINFLECTRA®abiosimilarforREMICADE®andtoextrapolatetheconclusionofequivalentefficacyfromtherheumatoidarthritisandankylosingspondylitisindicationsforwhichevidencewasprovidedtoIBDconditions”[76,page4]6.4 CDRCommentsonExtrapolation

HealthCanadaconsidersseveralfactorswhendecidingontheappropriatenessofextrapolatingauthorizationfromoneindicationtoanother.Thesefactorsinclude:17• similaritybetweenproducts(minor,unimportantdifferencesmayhaveclinicalimpact)• similarityinmechanismofactionforeachcondition• mechanismsofthediseasestobetreated• similaritiesinclinicalexperience• typeanddesignoftheclinicaltrials,populations,andendpointsmeasured• routeofadministration,dosage,andregimen.

HealthCanadareviewsqualityinformationofthebiosimilarcomparedwiththereferenceproduct,assessesthatthemostsensitivepopulationandbestendpointswereincludedinclinicaltrials,andevaluateswhetherthebiosimilarandreferenceproducthavesimilarsafetyandimmunogenicity(>100patientsandsufficientlylongduration).17InCADTH’spreviousreviewofInflectra,18HealthCanada’sdecisionsaboutextrapolatingdatafromtheRAandASindicationstoPsOandPsAwereprovided.ThedecisiontoextrapolatetoPsOandPsAweresupportedbycommondiseasepathologies,commonmechanismofactionofanti-TNFalphadrugsinthesediseases,andsimilaritiesinproductquality,safety,andPK.Atthattime,HealthCanadadidnotsupportextrapolatingdatafromRAandAStoIBDduetodifferencesindiseasemechanisms(roleoftmTNFalphaandADCCinIBD)andsafetyprofilesofinfliximabinIBDversusrheumaticdiseases(higherriskofhepatosplenicT-celllymphomainIBD).18Thesefactorsareexplainedinmoredetailbelow,under“PointsaboutextrapolationidentifiedbyHealthCanada.”InJune2016,HealthCanadaauthorizedtheuseofCT-P13fortheIBDindicationsbasedonextrapolationfrompreviouslysubmittedclinicalstudiesinpatientswithRAandAS,comparablepharmacokinetics,andnewlysubmittedphysiochemicalandbiologicaldata.1HealthCanadaissuedanNOCforInflectrafortheindicationsofCD,FCD,andUConJune10,2016.Theapprovedindicationsareasfollows:19• Reductionofsignsandsymptoms,inductionandmaintenanceofclinicalremissionandmucosal

healing,andreductionofcorticosteroiduseinadultpatientswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveCDwhohavehadaninadequateresponsetoacorticosteroidand/oraminosalicylate.Inflectracanbeusedaloneorincombinationwithconventionaltherapy.

• TreatmentofFCD,inadultpatientswhohavenotrespondeddespiteafullandadequatecourseoftherapywithconventionaltreatment.

• Reductionofsignsandsymptoms,inductionandmaintenanceofclinicalremissionandmucosalhealing,andreductionoreliminationofcorticosteroiduseinadultpatientswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveUCwhohavehadaninadequateresponsetoconventionaltherapy(i.e.,anaminosalicylateand/oracorticosteroidand/oranimmunosuppressant).

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

37CommonDrugReview November2017

TheEMA,FDAandtheAustralianTherapeuticGoodsAdministrationapprovedCT-P13foruseinadultpatientswithCDandUCbasedontheextrapolationofefficacyandsafetydataforRAandAS.20-22ThesejurisdictionshavealsoextendedusetopediatricpatientswithCDorUC;asidefromtheFDAwhichhasnotapprovedCT-P13forpediatricUC.ClinicalTrialEvidenceforRAandAS:Rigorousclinicaltrials,comparingCT-P13withRemicade,havebeenconductedwithPLANET-RAforRAandPLANET-ASforAS.ThisevidencewasevaluatedindetailinthepreviousCADTHsubmissionforInflectra.18PLANET-RAwasaphaseIIIRCTinpatientswithRA(N=606).CT-P13orRemicadewereadministeredat3mg/kgalongwithMTXplusfolicacid.Thetrialdemonstratednodifferencesinefficacy,safety,immunogenicity(developmentofADA),orPK.PLANET-ASwasaphaseIRCTinpatientswithAS(N=250).CT-P13orRemicadewereadministeredat5mg/kg.SimilarPK,efficacy,safety,andimmunogenicityweredemonstrated.18PointsAboutExtrapolationIdentifiedbyHealthCanada:Inthepathologyandmechanismsofactionofanti-TNFalphadrugsforRA,ASandIBD,somedifferencesexistthatpresenteduncertaintiesinextrapolatingbetweenthesediseaseconditions.ThepredominantformofTNFinRAandASissTNFalpha;whereas,inCDandUC,tmTNFalphaplaysanadditionalandcentralrolebyinitiatingreversesignallingpathways.23Also,unlikeRAandAS,inboweldiseasesADCCisanimportantmechanismofactionandismediatedbyafucosylationandFcγIIIareceptorbinding.MinordifferenceshavebeenobservedbetweenCT-P13andthereferenceproductinFcγIIIabindingandADCCactivityusinginvitroassayswithNKcellsfrompatientswithCDandV/VorV/FFcγIIIagenotype(nodifferenceobservedwithF/Fgenotype).InotherassaysusingPBMCsfrompatientswithCDandV/ForF/FFcγIIIagenotype,nodifferenceinADCCactivitywasobserved.24TheclinicalrelevanceofdifferencesinADCCactivitymaybeminor.Etanerceptisanotheranti-TNFalphadrugthatisclinicallyeffectiveinRAbutnotinIBD,possiblybecauseitislessefficientatreversesignallingandapoptosis.23However,thestructureofetanerceptdiffersfrominfliximabandthisresultsinadistinctefficacyprofile.23CT-P13wasshowntobecomparabletothereferenceproductwithrespecttoreversesignallingandapoptosis.19Hepatosplenic-TcelllymphomahasbeenobservedtooccuratahigherincidenceinadolescentandyoungadultmaleswithCDorUCwhoaretreatedwithinfliximabincombinationwithazathioprineor6-mercaptopurine.19OtherConsiderationsAboutExtrapolatingtoIBD:TheclinicalmanagementofIBDdiffersfromRAandAS.Forexample,MTXisanimmunosuppressantthatisnotadministeredasfrequentlyforIBDasitisforRAorAS.TheuseofMTXincombinationwithinfliximabhasbeenshowntoreducethedevelopmentofimmunogenicity(i.e.,theformationofADAagainstinfliximab).23Thedevelopmentofimmunogenicityisacriticalfactorinthelossofresponsetobiologicaldrugtreatment.25TheeffectofothermedicationregimensonimmunogenicitythatareadministeredwithinfliximabinIBD,suchasazathioprine,corticosteroids,or5-ASA,isunclear.Inastudyof174patientswithCD,concomitantadministrationofMTXorazathioprinewithinfliximabwasfoundtoreducetheincidenceofATIformation(46%versus73%withinfliximabmonotherapy);however,nodifferencesinATIformationwereobservedbetweeninfliximabplusMTXandinfliximabplusazathioprine.{44}Furtherinvestigationoftheeffectofimmunosuppressantregimensonimmunogenicityisneeded.Secondly,themaximumdoseofinfliximabforIBDis10mg/kgandishigherthanthedosesusedinPLANET-RAorPLANET-AS.AlthoughinvitrostudieswiththeseraofpatientswithIBDwhodeveloped

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

38CommonDrugReview November2017

ADAafterRemicadewerefoundtobecross-reactivewithCT-P13,suggestingsimilarfeaturesofimmunogenicity(Section4.4),theimmunogenicsimilarityofthehigherdoseofCT-P13withregularorhigherdosesofRemicadeisuncertain.ThereisalsoamicrobiologicalcomponenttoIBDthatisabsentinRAorAS.PatientswithIBDareathighriskforbacteremia/sepsisandinfectionssuchasshingles,skininfections,andpneumoniaandrequireclosemonitoring,especiallyduringtreatmentwithinfliximab.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

39CommonDrugReview November2017

7. COSTCOMPARISONTheInflectra100mg/vialdrugproductwillcarrya44%lowerprice($525.0000)relativetothecurrentlylowest-listedpriceofRemicade100mg/vial,whichisat$940.0000pertheRégiedel'assurancemaladieduQuébec(RAMQ).Consequently,the44%costdifferentialequatesto$415.0000savingsper100mgvial.PleasenotethattheListPriceofREMICADE®inallotherProvincesinCanada(excludingQuebec)is$987.0000per100mgvial.ThereforethecostsavingsofINFLECTRA®versusREMICADE®inprovincesoutsideQuebec(47%or$462lessexpensivethanREMICADE®)isactuallygreaterthanwhatisshowninthefollowingtables

TABLE5:COSTCOMPARISONOFINFLECTRAANDREMICADEFORCROHN’SDISEASE(FIRSTYEAR)

Drug/Comparator Strength DosageForm Price($) RecommendedDosec

AverageDrugCost($)/Year

Inflectra 100mg/vial Lyophilizedpower $525.0000a 5mg/kg $16,800Remicade 100mg/vial Lyophilizedpower $940.0000b 5mg/kg $30,080

aPublicprice.bRAMQListofMedications,updated2016-02-08.cInflectraandRemicadeproductmonograph.

TABLE6:COSTCOMPARISONOFINFLECTRAANDREMICADEFORCROHN’SDISEASE(SUBSEQUENTYEAR)

Drug/Comparator Strength DosageForm Price($) ExpectedDosec

AverageDrugCost($)/Year

Inflectra 100mg/vial Lyophilizedpower $525.0000a 5mg/kg $14,700Remicade 100mg/vial Lyophilizedpower $940.0000b 5mg/kg $26,320

aPublicpricebRAMQlistofMedications,updated2016-02-08cInflectraandRemicadeproductmonograph

TABLE7:COSTCOMPARISONOFINFLECTRAANDREMICADEFORULCERATIVECOLITIS(FIRSTYEAR)

Drug/Comparator Strength DosageForm Price($) RecommendedDosec

AverageDrugCost($)/Year

Inflectra 100mg/vial Lyophilizedpower $525.0000a 5mg/kg $16,800Remicade 100mg/vial Lyophilizedpower $940.0000b 5mg/kg $30,080

aPublicprice.bRAMQlistofMedications,updated2016-02-08.cInflectraandRemicadeproductmonograph.

TABLE8:COSTCOMPARISONOFINFLECTRAANDREMICADEFORULCERATIVECOLITIS(MAINTENANCEATEVERY7WEEKSA),(SUBSEQUENTYEAR)

Drug/Comparator Strength DosageForm Price($) ExpectedDosec

AverageDrugCost($)/Year

Inflectra 100mg/vial Lyophilizedpower $525.0000a 5mg/kg $14,700Remicade 100mg/vial Lyophilizedpower $940.0000b 5mg/kg $26,320

aPublicprice.bRAMQlistofMedications,updated2016-02-08.cInflectraandRemicadeproductmonograph.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

40CommonDrugReview November2017

CDRReviewerCommentsRegardingCostInformationSummaryoftheManufacturer’sAnalysisSEBinfliximab(Inflectra)isavailableasa100mg/vialsolutionforintravenousinfusionatamanufacturersubmittedpriceof$525.00pervial.27ThemanufacturersubmittedacostcomparisonbetweenInflectraandreferenceinfliximab(Remicade)forthreeindications:adultpatientswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveCD,FCD,andUC.27Themanufacturerassumedaweight-baseddoseof5mg/kgforInflectraandRemicadeforthethreereviewedindications.Undertheassumptionofsimilareffectandusageoftheinterventions,thecostsavingsofInflectracomparedwithRemicadewerereportedtobe44%ofthemanufacturer’sbasecase;usingtheRAMQ(Quebec)listpriceforRemicade($940.00per100mgvial).FortheotherCanadianjurisdictions,thedifferencewasreportedtobeupto47%ofthemanufacturer’sbasecase(Remicadeprice:$987.00per100mgvial).27CDRAssessmentoftheManufacturer’sCostComparison• UsingtheOntarioExceptionalAccessProgram(EAP)priceofRemicadeasareference,28theannual

costofInflectrais47%lowerthanthatofRemicade(refertoTable9).

TABLE9:INFLIXIMABDOSINGBASEDONTHEMANUFACTURERSCOSTCOMPARISONTreatment/Indications

TimePeriod RecommendedDosea

NumberofTreatments/Yeara

Priceper100mgVial($)b

AnnualCost($)c

Inflectra/CDandUC

Firstyear 5mg/kg 8 525.0000 16,800Subsequentyears

5mg/kg 6.5 525.0000 13,650

Remicade/CDandUC

Firstyear 5mg/kg 8 987.5600 31,601Subsequentyears

5mg/kg 6.5 987.5600 25,677

CD=Crohn’sdisease;UC=ulcerativecolitis.aInflectraandRemicadeproductmonograph.bManufacturersubmittedpriceforInflectra;27OntarioEAPpriceforRemicade.28cAssumespatientweightisbetween60kgto80kg.IssuesforConsideration• GiventhecomplexitiesofmanagingIBD,theclinicalexpertnotedthatphysiciansandpatientsmay

bereluctanttoswitchfromRemicadetoInflectrawhenapatientisadequatelymanagedonRemicade.Asaresult,InflectramaybemorelikelytobeusedinpatientswhoarenewlystartinginfliximabratherthanthoseswitchingfromRemicade.

• ThemanufacturerofRemicadesponsorsinfusioncentresfortheadministrationofRemicade,andcoverscostsofpatientfollow-upandmonitoring.ThesecostsareexpectedtobesimilarlycoveredbythemanufacturerofInflectra,therefore,thisisnotexpectedtoresultinadditionalcoststothepubliclyfundedhealthcarepayer.10

• ThedosageofInflectraisbasedonpatientweight.ConsideringthatInflectraandRemicadehavesimilarpharmacokinetics,pharmacodynamics,clinicalefficacyandharms,andsharethesamedosingstrategies,therelativecostdifferencebetweenthedrugsisthereforelikelytobemaintainedregardlessofpatientcharacteristicsorrequireddailydose.

• Basedontheproductmonograph,thedoseofinfliximabinpatientswithUCandCDcanbeincreasedtoupto10mg/kg.19DoseescalationwouldsimilarlyimpactthecostofbothInflectraandRemicade,therelativecostdifferencewouldthereforenotbeaffected.However,thiscouldaffect

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

41CommonDrugReview November2017

thecostdifferentialwithothertreatmentsfortheseindications.• Inflectra(SEBinfliximab)waspreviouslyreviewedbyCADTHforfourindications:RA,AS,PsA,and

PsO.ItwasrecommendedthatInflectrabelistedinaccordancewiththeHealthCanadaindicationandinasimilarmannertoRemicade.29

• ThelistingcriteriaforRemicadedifferacrosspubliclyfundeddrugplansinCanada;whereas,Remicadeisavailableasarestrictedbenefitwithspecificlistingcriteria(Appendix2).TheexpectedsavingsfromInflectracomparedwithRemicadearebasedontheassumptionthatthelistingcriteriaforRemicadewouldbeappliedtoInflectra.

ConclusionAtthesubmittedprice,theannualcostofInflectrais47%lessthanthereferenceproductinfliximab(Remicade)whenusingtheOntarioEAPpriceforRemicade($987.56)asareference.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

42CommonDrugReview November2017

8. DISCUSSION

BiologicaldrugsareimportanttreatmentoptionsforinducingandmaintainingremissionofCDandUC.InCanada,thethreeanti-TNFalphadrugsapprovedforIBDareinfliximab,adalimumab,andgolimumab.23Thesedrugsmaybeusedinstep-uporstep-downtreatmentapproaches.Inthestep-upapproach,5-ASAisprescribedinitially,followedbycorticosteroids(e.g.,topicalfoams,budesonide,prednisone),immunosuppressants(e.g.,azathioprine,MTX),andanti-TNFalphadrugsifsymptomsarenotcontrolled.Inthestep-downapproach,drugsatthehigherendofthetreatmentladderareinitiatedfirst,followedbydownwardtitrationtothedrug(s)thatofferthemostfavourableprofileofsymptomcontrolandminimizationofadverseeffects.30CT-P13isabiosimilarofthereferenceinfliximabproduct,Remicade,andoffersanother,potentiallycost-effective,treatmentoptionforCDandUC.Abiosimilarproductisdesignedtobesimilartoareferenceproductthatisalreadybeingusedinclinicalpractice.Themolecularcomplexityofbiologicscomparedwithotherdrugsrequiresclosescrutinyofthebiosimilar’sPK,efficacy,safety,andimmunogenicity.TheclinicalevidencefortheuseofCT-P13inIBDwasbasedonobservationaltrials.NodirectcomparisonswithRemicadeinthispatientpopulationwereavailable.Datafrominvitrostudiessuggestsimilarimmunogenicity,sTNFalphaandtmTNFalphabinding,andADCCactivityusingPMBCsamongCT-P13andRemicade,althoughdifferencesinADCCactivityusingNKcellswereobserved.SomedifferencesbetweenIBDandRAorASexist,suchasthegreaterrolesoftmTNFalphaandADCC,higherinfliximabdosingrequirements,andadministrationofdifferentimmunosuppressanttreatmentregimensinIBD.TheresultsoftheongoingRCT(CT-P133.4)areanticipatedtoprovideadditionalevidencetoassesstheefficacyandsafetyofCT-P13comparedwithRemicadeinIBD.Inaddition,theexperiencesofjurisdictionsthatarealreadyusingCT-P13forIBD,suchastheUS,Korea,andvariousEuropeancountries,canbeusedasaguidefortheongoingassessmentofitsefficacyandsafety.Nonewsafetysignalshaveemerged,althoughcontinuedlong-termmonitoringisneeded.TheCanadianAssociationofGastroenterologyhasissuedapositionstatementonSEBsforIBD.31Theysupporttheuseofbiosimilarsaspotentiallyeffectiveandcost-savingoptions,butemphasizethatevidencefromclinicaltrialsrelevanttoCanadiansshouldbeavailabletosupporttheiruseinpractice.PatientgroupsforIBDhavealsovoicedtheirconcernsabouttherapiesbeingchosenbasedsolelyonconsiderationsofcost(Appendix3).Theyhaveindicatedthatdiseaseremissioncanbedifficulttoobtainandthatchangestotherapy,includingswitchingfromaninnovatorproducttoanSEB,shouldnotbemadewithoutapatient’sconsent.Expertknowledge,open-dialogue,andpatientchoicewillbeintegraltoeffectivelyimplementingCT-P13inclinicalpractice.HealthcareprovidersandpatientsshouldbeprovidedwithinformationaboutHealthCanada’sSEBregulatoryprocess,theclinicalevidenceavailableforCT-P13,andtherationalebehindextrapolation.Post-marketingdataofCT-P13willbecriticalformonitoringexpectedandnewsafetysignalsandtoensurethatbenefitsoutweighrisksinbothtreatment-naiveandtreatment-switchpatients.Assessmentofimmunogenicityandincidenceofserioussideeffects,suchashepatosplenicT-celllymphoma,willbeneededforevaluatingCT-P13’srisk-benefitprofile.GiventheinterimnatureoftheCT-P13PMSstudy,itwillbeimportanttoassessiftheobservedresultsremainstableoverseveralyears.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

43CommonDrugReview November2017

PotentialPlaceinTherapy2Thereferenceinfliximabproduct,Remicade,iscurrentlyusedforpatientswithmoderatetosevereCDandUCaloneorincombinationwithimmunomodulatorssuchasazathioprine.Itiseffectiveintreatingperianaldiseaseaswellasluminalinflammation.OccasionallypatientsarestartedonRemicadeimmediatelyupondiagnosis,butmoreoftenbothprivateinsurersandpublicdrugplansindicatethatpatientsshouldfirsthavebeeninadequatelymanagedwith5-ASA,steroids,andimmunomodulatorssuchasazathioprine.Remicadehasasimilaractionandefficacytootheranti-TNFalphadrugs,andisadministeredundersupervisionatinfusioncentres.Forsomepatients,contactwithhealthprovidersonaregularbasisishelpful,whileforothers,self-administrationispreferred,inwhichcaseanotheranti-TNFalphadrugs,suchasadalimumab,maybeused.CT-P13isanSEBthatdoesnotaddtoavailabletherapyoptionsbutprovidesalessexpensivealternativetoanestablishedtherapy.Itisnotdesignedtobenovelbuttobesimilartothereferenceproduct(Remicade).AsignificantpercentageofpatientswithIBDdonothaveinsuranceforthecostofmedications,oftenbecausethediseaseaffectsyoungerindividualswhomaynotyethavedrugplaninsurance.32Followingdiseaseonset,insuranceisverydifficulttoobtain.Therefore,thepotentialcostsavingsofCT-P13inthispopulationwouldbeadvantageous.Bothprivateandpublicdrugplanshaveguidelinesinplacethatstipulatewhichpatientsareeligiblefortreatmentwithanti-TNFalphadrugs,andCT-P13willfitwithinthatframework.Animportantquestion,whichwillneedtobeaddressedifthedrugisintroduced,iswhetherpatientswhoarestableonRemicadewillhavethedrugsubstitutedwithCT-P13orwhetheritwillonlybeusedintreatment-naivepatients.Endoscopicevaluationofdiseaseactivitymayberequiredinpatientswhoexperienceadiseaseflareafterswitching,andtherearesignificantbarrierstothatintermsofaccesstoendoscopyprocedures.Observationalcohortstudiesfromdifferentcountriessuggestthatdiseaseactivityandadverseeffectsaresimilarbeforeandafterswitching.However,giventhelimitationsofobservationalstudies,theassessmentandpredictionofpatientresponseuponswitchingfromRemicadetoCT-P13willrequireclosemonitoring.

2ThisinformationisbasedoninformationprovidedindraftformbytheclinicalexpertconsultedbyCDRreviewersforthepurposeofthisreview.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

44CommonDrugReview November2017

9. CONCLUSION

CT-P13providescliniciansandpatientswithanotherpotentiallycost-effectivechoiceofabiologicaldrugforIBD.ThefocusofthisCDRreviewofCT-P13(Inflectra)isfortherecentlyapprovedindicationsofCD,FCD,andUCinadultpatients.TheNoticeofCompliance(NOC)fortheCD,FCD,andUCindicationswasgrantedsubsequenttoanearlierNOCforCT-P13fortheindicationsofRA,AS,PsO,andPsA.Ofnote,HealthCanadaapprovedtheindicationsofPsOandPsAbasedontheextrapolationofdatafromstudiesconductedwithpatientswithRAandAS.AllclinicalevidencecurrentlyavailableforCT-P13inpatientswithIBDisbasedonobservational,open-labelstudiesfromKoreaorEuropeinsmallnumbersofpatients.Thepivotalstudy,CT-P13PMS,isanobservational,open-labelstudyconductedinSouthKoreainpatientswithIBD,witha30-weekinterimanalysis.NaiveindirectcomparisonsofCT-P13withstudiesofRemicade(infliximab)suggestsimilarefficacyandsimilarsafetyforsomesafetyendpointsinpatientswithCDorUC.Nonetheless,intheabsenceofdatafromRCTs,theclinicalsimilarityofCT-P13andRemicadeforIBDintheCanadianpopulationremainsuncertain.GiventhattheresultsofCT-P13PMSarebasedonaninterimanalysis,theongoingmonitoringofCT-P13inpatientswithIBDwillbeimportantforevaluatinglong-termefficacyandsafety.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

45CommonDrugReview November2017

APPENDIX1:ADDITIONALDATAPleaseincludeanylargetablesorfiguresinthissectionofthetemplate.Pleaseensurethefollowingisincluded:• Allitemsinthissectionmustbewell-labelled(e.g.,Table6:AdverseEventsfromStudyX).Allitemsinthissectionmustbeclearlyreferencedinthemainbodyofthetemplate.Forexample,“pleaseseeTable6inAppendix1forcompletedetailsregardingtheadverseeventsreportedintheStudyX.”TABLE10:HIGHLEVELOVERVIEWOFTHETESTSANDCONCLUSIONSFORTHEOLIGOSACCHARIDEPROFILINGANDBIOLOGICACTIVITYCOMPARISONBETWEENCT-P13ANDREMICADE®

Typeofstudy(s) Briefoverviewoftestsandconclusions ReferencesBindingofsolubleandtransmembraneTNFαOligosaccharideprofiling • HPAEC-PADTest

• Tocharacterizetheglycanmicro-heterogeneityassociatedwiththesinglesiteofN-glycosylation(Asn300),glycanswereenzymaticallycleavedusingPNGaseFandresolvedusingchromatography.

• TheHPAEC-PADdatarevealthatthetypeandproportionoftheunchargedglycansisreasonablyconservedbetweenCT-P13,EUandUSapprovedREMICADE®.

• Minordifferencesinafucosylatedglycans:meanvaluesofMan5+G0,forEUandUSapprovedREMICADE®byHPAEC-PADwerevvvvvvvvvvvvv,respectively,comparedtovvvvvFORCT-P13.

CTDModule3.2.R.2.7

EffectofblockingsolubleTNFαinvitroIBDmodel

• InhibitionofInflammatoryCytokines(IL-8)fromCaco-2cellstest

• TheabilityofCT-P13,EUandUSapprovedREMICADE®toinhibitreleaseofinflammatorycytokines(IL-8)fromanintestinalepithelialcelllinefollowingstimulationwithcytokines(TNF-α,IL-1,LPSandIFN-γ)wasevaluated.

• Thedataindicatethatthe3productsarecomparableinrelativesuppressionofcytokineinCaCo-2cellswithmean±SDvaluesforCT-P13,EUandUSapprovedREMICADE®.

CTDModule3.2.R.2.8.1.6

tmTNFαReceptorSignalingStudies

• Suppressionofcytokinereleasebyreversesignalingtest• Thismethodwasdevelopedtomeasurereversesignaling

resultingfromsamplesbindingtotmTNFαandresultingininhibitionofLPS-inducedcytokinerelease(TNFα)fromPeripheralBloodMononuclearcells(PBMCs).

• PBMCsfromhealthysubjectswereisolatedandthenincubated,withsamplesoverarangeofconcentrations.

• TherelativeinhibitionofcytokinereleaseinducedbyreversesignalingonbindingofCT-P13issimilartothatofEUandUSapprovedREMICADE®.Themeanvaluesforeachconcentrationalsoindicatecomparableactivityofthe3productsininhibitionofcytokinereleasebyreversesignaling.

CTDModule3.2.R.2.8.1.5

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

46CommonDrugReview November2017

Typeofstudy(s) Briefoverviewoftestsandconclusions References• Inductionofapoptosisbyreversesignalingtest• Apoptoticactivity,resultingfromantibody-induced

signalingafterbindingtotransmembranewasconductedusingtherecombinantJurkatcelllinewhichstablyexpressestmTNFα.

• TheapoptosisassaywasperformedusingacommerciallyavailablekitwhichlabelscellsusingAnnexin-V/PItodeterminethenumberofapoptoticcells.

• TherelativeinductionofapoptosisthroughreversesignalingofCT-P13,EUandUSapprovedREMICADE®aresimilar.

CTDModule3.2.R.2.8.1.4

Fcf(ab’)2relatedEvaluationofRegulatoryMacrophageFunction

• EffectofInfliximabonSuppressionofTCellProliferationbyRegulatoryMacrophagesinMixedLymphocyteReaction(MLR)Assay

• TheMLRrequiresmixingofHumanLeukocyteAntigendisparatePBMCfrom2individualsthatarenonethelessmatchedforFcγRIIIagenotype.

• CT-P13,EUandUSapprovedREMICADE®inducedregulatorymacrophagesintheMLRassay.SimilaritywasobservedbetweenCT-P13andEUandUSapprovedREMICADE®atallconcentrations.

CTDModule3.2.R.2.8.2

• QuantitationofInfliximab-InducedRegulatoryMacrophagesbyFACS

• Adose-dependentinhibitionofTcellproliferationofPBMCsfromhealthydonorswasinducedbyCT-P13EUandUSapprovedREMICADE®.

• Similaractivitywasdetectedforthe3products.• EffectofWoundHealingbyRegulatoryMacrophages• Theeffectoftheinducedmacrophagesonscratchesina

colorectalcelllayer(HCT116)wasdeterminedinawoundhealingassay.

• Woundhealingmodelsusingbidirectional(V/F+V/F)MLRwithPBMCfromhealthydonorsanddemonstratedthattherewascomparableactivityforCT-P13andEUandUSapprovedREMICADE®withrespecttotheabilityofinducedregulatorymacrophagestopromotewoundhealing.

CDCStudies • Complement-dependentcytotoxicity(CDC)Activity• C1q-bindingisfollowedbyactivationofC1qenzymatic

activityandsubsequentactivationofthedownstreamcomplementcascade.Thelevelofcytotoxicactivitywasmeasuredbyviablecellcountingusingakit.

• ThemeanrelativebindingvaluesforCT-P13,EUandUSapprovedREMICADE®weresimilar.

CTDModule3.2.R.2.8.3.2

• C1qbindingaffinity(ELISA)• BindingaffinityofCT-P13EUandUSapproved

REMICADE®toC1qwasmeasuredbyELISA.• ThemeanrelativebindingvaluesCT-P13,EUandUS

approvedREMICADE®weresimilarforC1qbinding

CTDModule3.2.R.2.8.3.1

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

47CommonDrugReview November2017

Typeofstudy(s) Briefoverviewoftestsandconclusions Referencesaffinity.

FcγreceptorBindingStudies

• ComparativebindingtoFcγreceptors:FcγRIbindingaffinity(ELISA),FcγRIIa,FcγRIIbandFcRnbindingaffinity

• ThemeanrelativebindingaffinityvaluesFORCT-P13,EUandUSapprovedREMICADE®showthatthe3productshavecomparableinFcγRIIa,FcγRIIbandFcRnbindingaffinityThethreeproductshavebeendemonstratedtohavesimilarbindingaffinity.

CTDModule3.2.R.2.8.4

• ComparativebindingtoFcyreceptors:FcγRIIIa(VandFhemizygotes)andFcγRIIIbbindingaffinity(SPR)

• Usingthevvvvvvvvvinstrument,thebindingofCT-P13,EUandUSapprovedREMICADE®wasmeasuredinrealtimeat3concentrationstotheimmobilizedFcγRIIIa(Vtype)ligandbymeasuringchangesintherefractiveindex.

• TheresultsdemonstratethattheFcγRIIIa(Vtype)bindingaffinityofEUandUSapprovedREMICADE®batcheswassignificantlyhigherthanforCT-P13,confirmingthedataobtainedinthepreviousstudysubmittedintheNDSshowingFcγRIIIa(Vtypepolymorphicvariant)bindingaffinityisdependentontheafucosylationlevel(CTDModule3.2.R.5,Sequence0000).

• ThisdifferenceinbindingbetweenCT-P13andREMICADE®ismuchsmallerthanthedifferenceinbindingtoFcγRIIIaofdifferentgenotypes.Studieshavefailedtodiscernaclinicaldifferenceinresponse(Crohn’sDiseaseActivityIndex[CDAI])followinginfliximabtreatmentbetweenCDpatientsexpressingthelowaffinityF/FgenotypecomparedtothoseexpressingthehighaffinityV/Vgenotype[67].

• ThemeanrelativebindingaffinityvaluesINFLECTRA®,EUandUSapprovedREMICADE®indicatesomedifferenceinbindingaffinitytoFcγRIIIbalthoughvvvvvvvvbatchesofINFLECTRA®werewithinthemean±3SDofEUapprovedREMICADE®batchesandvvvvvvvvbatcheswerewithinthemean±3SDofUSapprovedREMICADE®batches.

• TheclinicalrelevanceofanypossibledifferencesinFcγRIIIbbindingaffinitywereinvestigatedinpreviousstudiessubmittedintheNDScomparingtheabilityofCT-P13andEUapprovedREMICADE®tobindtoNeutrophils,whichexpresspredominantlyFcγRIIIbonthecellsurface.ThesestudieswerepresentedinCTDModule3.2.R.5(Sequence0000)anddemonstratedthatthereisnodifferenceinbindingofCT-P13andEUapprovedREMICADE®toneutrophilsfromhealthyvolunteersandCDpatients.Thus,anydifferenceobservedinbindingaffinitytoFcγRIIIbbySPRappearstohavenoclinicalsignificance.

CTDModule3.2.R.2.8.4.1CTDModule3.2.R.2.8.4.2

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

48CommonDrugReview November2017

Typeofstudy(s) Briefoverviewoftestsandconclusions References• ComparativebindingtoRcyreceptors:Exvivoassay(NK

cellsfromHealthyPBMC• ToassessifthedifferencesbetweenCT-P13,EUandUS

approvedREMICADE®inFcγRIIIa(V-typeandF-typepolymorphicvariants)bindingasdeterminedbySPRtranslateintofunctionaldifferencesrelatedtobindingtotheFcγRIIIapresentonNKcells,exvivoNKcellbindingstudieswereconductedinthe3-wayabridgedstudy.NKcellsareknowntoexpressFcγRIIIaontheircellsurfaceandserveassuitableexvivomodelfortheassessmentofFcγRIIIabinding.

• ThemeanrelativebindingofCT-P13,EUandUSapprovedREMICADE®inthepresenceof1%bovineserumalbuminshowsomedifferencebetweenCT-P13andREMICADE®.Howeverinthemorephysiologicallyrepresentativeconditionsinthepresenceof50%humanserum,themeanrelativebindingofCT-P13,EUandUSapprovedREMICADE®havecomparablebindingtoFcγRIIIaonNKcells,althoughonebatchofINFLECTRA®withavalueofvvvrelativebindingtoNKcellsexvivoin50%serumwasbelowthemean-3SDofUSapprovedREMICADE®ofvvvvv.

• ThedifferenceobservedinexvivoNKcellbindingbetweenCT-P13andEUapprovedREMICADE®issmallincomparisontothedifferenceinbindingofEUapprovedREMICADE®toFcγRIIIaofdifferentgenotypes.

CTDModule3.2.R.2.8.4.8

ADCCPotencystudiesusingdifferenteffectorandtargetcells

• ADCCusingPBMCfromHealthydonors• TheADCCassayusingtransfectedtmTNFαJurkatcellsas

targetcellsandPBMCfromhealthydonorofV/FFcγRIIIagenotypeaseffectorcellswasconductedusingvvbatcheseachproduct.

• PBMCofFcγRIIIagenotypeswereusedinthisstudyADCCusingPBMCfromHealthydonors.

• ThemeanrelativeADCCactivityofCT-P13,EUandUSapprovedREMICADE®showsimilarADCCactivitybetweenINFLECTRA®andREMICADE®usingtransmembraneTNFαJurkattargetcellsandPBMCeffectorcells.AllbatchesofINFLECTRA®werewithinthemean±3SDrangeofbothEUandUSapprovedREMICADE®batchesusingthisassaysystem.

CTDModule3.2.R.2.8.5.1

• ADCCusingNKcellsfromHealthdonors• TheADCCassayusingtransfectedtmTNFαJurkatcellsas

targetcellsandNKcellisolatedfromPBMCofV/FFcγRIIIahealthydonorsaseffectorcells.

• ThemeanrelativeADCCactivityofCT-P13,EUandUSapprovedREMICADE®indicatesomeslightdifferenceinADCCactivitybetweenCT-P13andREMICADE®usingtransmembraneTNFαJurkattargetcellsandNKeffectorcells.

CTDModule3.2.R.2.8.5.1CTDModule3.2.R.2.8.5.2

• ADCCusingLipopolysaccharide(LPS)-stimulatedmonocytesastargetcells

CTDModule3.2.R.2.8.5.3

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

49CommonDrugReview November2017

Typeofstudy(s) Briefoverviewoftestsandconclusions References• TheabilityoftheLPS-stimulatedmonocytesisolated

fromhealthydonortoactastargetsinanADCCassaywasinvestigatedamongCT-P13,EUandUSapprovedREMICADE®.

• ThedatashownoADCCactivitywasdetectableforCT-P13,EUandUSapprovedREMICADE®.

• ThesefindingssuggestthatLPS-stimulatedmonocytes,supposedtoberepresentativeofinflammatoryfociinvivo,donotexpresssufficientamountsoftmTNFαtoinduceaneffectiveADCCinresponsetothepresenceofCT-P13,EUandUSapprovedREMICADE®.

• ExvivotmTNFαExpressionLevelinIBDPatients• Biopsymaterialwasobtainedfromvvpatientswithmild

tosevereUCorCDandtheleveloftmTNFexpressiononLaminaPropriaMononuclearCellsfromtheseIBDpatientshasbeeninvestigated.

• ThedataclearlyshowthatmonocytesandmacrophagesinthelaminapropriaofIBDpatientsexpresslowlevelsoftmTNF.TheexpressionoftmTNFonmonocytes/macrophageswasapproximatelyvvvvvlowerthanonmonocytes/macrophagesfromLPSstimulatedPBMCsfromhealthydonorsandtmTNFwasexpressedatonly2%(50foldlower)ofthelevelobtainedwithtmTNFαJurkatcells.

• ThesedataconfirmthatlowlevelsoftmTNFαareexpressedonmonocytes/macrophagesinlaminapropriaofIBDpatientsandtogetherwithdatafromADCCstudiessuggestthatADCCishighlyunlikelytocontributetotherapeuticeffectinIBD.

CTDModule3.2.R.2.8.5.4

REMICADE®PHARMACOKINETICLINEARITYConcentrationVersusTimeCurveofInfliximabtreatmentwithandwithoutMethotrexate(MTX):DatafortheseruminfliximablogconcentrationversustimecurveforRApatientstreatedwith3and10mg/kginfliximabsupportsadose-proportionalPKprolife,regardlessofthepresenceorabsenceofMTX[77,78].IntheCO168T14trial,assessing101RApatientstreatedwith1,3or10mg/kgorplaceboeitheraloneorincombinationwith7.5mg/kgMTX,therewasnoapparentdose-orconcentration-efficacyresponsefor3or10mg/kgdosingatevery4weeksorevery8weeks[79,80].TheplasmaconcentrationofinfliximabwasslightlyincreasedwiththeuseofMTX,withthemostprofoundeffectseenwithlowdose1mg/kg[77-80].Adramaticdecreaseinseruminfliximabconcentrationwasobservedforthe1mg/kgdosegivenwithoutMTX,andthoughttobearesultofincreasedinfliximabclearanceduetoHumanAnti-chimericAntibodyformation[77-80].RegardlessofMTXadministration,theinfliximab3and10mg/kgdoseswereassociatedwithsimilarefficacy.Thedurationofclinicalresponseinthe1mg/kgdosewithoutMTXwasmarkedlyshorterthan1mg/kgwithMTX[77].ThepivotalPhaseIIIATTRACTtrial,assessing428patientstreatedwith3or10mg/kg(withMTX)orplacebo(withMTX)at4-or8-weekintervals,showedmaximuminfliximabserumconcentrationstobedirectlyproportionaltointravenousdoseovera3mg/kgto10mg/kgrange[81].Theinfliximabmedium

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

50CommonDrugReview November2017

serumconcentrationwas3.2-3.3-foldhigherfor10mg/kgdosecomparedto3mg/kgdose,administeredevery8weeksthrough14weeksoftreatment[80].InfliximabserumAccumulation:Infliximabcouldbedetectedintheserumofmostpatientsforatleast8weeksafterasingledoseof5mg/kgforCrohn’sdiseaseandtheRAmaintenancedoseof3mg/kgevery8weeks[82].Repeatedadministrationofinfliximab(5mg/kgat0,2and6weeksinfistulisingCrohn´sdisease,3or10mg/kgevery4or8weeksinRA)resultedinaslightaccumulationofinfliximabinserumaftertheseconddose[83].Nosystemicaccumulationofinfliximabwasobservedincontinuedrepeatedtreatmentwith3mg/kgor10mg/kgat4-or8-weekintervalsinRApatientsorinsevereCrohn’sdiseasepatientsretreatedwith4infusionsof10mg/kgat8weekintervals[11,82][12].InfliximabVolumeofDistributionandClearance:Thevolumeofdistributionofinfliximabatsteadystate(4-5.6Lina70kgindividual)isnotdependentontheadministereddoseandindicatesthatinfliximabisdistributedprimarilywithinthevascularcompartment[11,84][12].Thereisaverylowsystemicclearanceofinfliximabofabout11-15mL/hourandtheeliminationhalf-lifeofinfliximabcanrange7.7-14.7days[11,77,82].Therearenospecificstudiesassessingthemetabolismorexcretionofinfliximabinhumans[77].Itisbelievedthatinfliximabiseliminatedinasimilarmannertootherproteins[11].Therearenomajordifferencesinclearanceorvolumeofdistributionofinfliximabinpatientssubgroupedbyageorweight[11,12,78].Anti-drugantibodydevelopmenthasbeenassociatedwithincreasedclearanceofinfliximabinUCpatients[12],whilehigherserumalbuminconcentrationswereassociatedwithdecreasedclearanceofinfliximabinpatientswithUC[12].HumanAnti-chimericAntibodyformationisassociatedwithincreasedclearanceofinfliximabandadecreasedexposure,basedonareaunderthecurve,whenMTXisnotco-administered[78,79,81].Thisincreaseinclearanceisdose-dependentandthehighestlevelofclearanceisobservedwiththe1mg/kgdose[78,79,81]

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

CommonDrugReview November2017 51

APPENDIX2:DRUGPLANLISTINGSTATUSFORREFERENCEPRODUCTForeachindicationthatisapprovedbyHealthCanadafortheSEB(orlikelytobeapproved,inthecaseofasubmissionfiledonapre-NOCbasis),pleaseprovidethepubliclyavailablelistingstatusandcriteriaforthereferenceproduct.

Step1:Usethefollowingabbreviationstocompletethetable.Useaseparaterowforeachindicationandaddmorerowsifnecessary.

Abbreviation DescriptionEX Exceptionitemforwhichcoverageisdeterminedonacase-by-casebasisFB FullbenefitNB NotabenefitRES Restrictedbenefitwithspecifiedcriteria(e.g.,specialauthorization,exceptiondrugstatus,limitedusebenefit)UR Underreview

ListingStatusforREMICADE®

Indication(s) CDR-ParticipatingDrugPlans

BC AB SK MB ON NB NS PE NL YK NT NIHB DND VACCrohn’sDisease RES RES RES RES RES RES RES RES RES RES RES RES RES RES

UlcerativeColitis NB RES RES RES RES NB NB NB NB RES NB NB NB NB

AB=Alberta,BC=BritishColumbia,DND=DepartmentofNationalDefence;MN=Manitoba;NIHB=Non-InsuredHealthBenefitsProgram;NL=NewfoundlandandLabrador;NS=NovaScotia;NT=NorthwestTerritories;ON=Ontario;PE=PrinceEdwardIsland;SK=Saskatchewan;VAC=VeteransAffairsCanada;YK=Yukon.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

CommonDrugReview November2017 52

Step2:Forallrestrictedbenefitentries(RES),pleasestatethecriteriausedbyeachdrugplan.Useaseparatetableforeachindicationandaddordeleterowsasnecessary.

RestrictedBenefitCriteriaforREMICADE®forthetreatmentofCrohn’sDisease

DrugPlan CriteriaforRestrictedBenefitBC TreatmentofmoderatetosevereactiveCrohn'sdiseaseorfistulisingCrohn’sdiseaseaccordingtoestablishedcriteriawhen

prescribedbyagastroenterologistActiveCrohn’sDiseaseCURRENTHARVEYBRADSHAWINDEXgreaterthan8Resistant,dependent,contraindicatedorintoleranttocorticosteroids-corticosteroidresistant:lackofasymptomaticresponsedespiteacourseoforalprednisone40-60mg/day(orequivalent)foraminimumof14days.-corticosteroiddependent:unabletowithdraworalcorticosteroidwithin3monthsofinitiationwithoutarecurrenceofsymptoms;asymptomaticrelapsewithin3monthsofstopping;ortheneedfortwoormorecoursesofcorticosteroidswithinoneyear.-corticosteroiduseiscontraindicated(specify):-intolerant/sideeffect(s)(specify):FORPATIENTSWITHFISTULIZINGCROHN’SFailurewith,intolerancetoorcontraindicationto:Ciprofloxacinatmaximallytolerateddoses(min3weektrial)Metronidazoleatmaximallytolerateddoses(min3weektrial)ForRenewalCURRENTHARVEYBRADSHAWINDEXSCOREWHILEONTREATMENTREQUIRESHBISCORE<5ORADECREASEINSCORE>4.

AB ModeratelytoSeverelyActiveCrohn'sDiseaseandFistulisingCrohn'sDisease:"SpecialauthorizationcoveragemaybeapprovedforcoverageofinfliximabforthereductioninsignsandsymptomsandinductionandmaintenanceofclinicalremissionofModeratelytoSeverelyActiveCrohn'sDiseaseand/ortreatmentof

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

CommonDrugReview November2017 53

DrugPlan CriteriaforRestrictedBenefitFistulisingCrohn'sDiseaseinpatientswhomeetthefollowingcriteria:-InfliximabmustbeprescribedbyaSpecialistinGastroenterologyoraphysicianappropriatelytrainedbytheUniversityofAlbertaortheUniversityofCalgaryandrecognizedasaprescriberbyAlbertaBlueCrossforinfliximabforcoverageforthetreatmentofModeratelytoSeverelyActiveCrohn'sDiseaseand/orFistulisingCrohn'sDiseasepatients(`Specialist').-Patientsmustbe18yearsofageoroldertobeconsideredforcoverageofinfliximab.-Patientswillbelimitedtoreceivingonedoseofinfliximabperprescriptionattheirpharmacy.-Patientsmaybeallowedtoswitchfromonebiologicagenttoanotherfollowinganadequatetrialofthefirstbiologicagentifunresponsivetotherapy(bothprimarylossofresponseandsecondarylossofresponse)orduetoseriousadverseeffectsorcontraindications.Anadequatetrialisdefinedasataminimumthecompletionofinductiondosing(e.g.initialcoverageperiod).-Patientswillnotbepermittedtoswitchbacktoapreviouslytrialedbiologicagentiftheyweredeemedunresponsivetotherapy.-Patientsarelimitedtoreceivingonebiologicagentatatimeregardlessoftheconditionforwhichitisbeingprescribed.PriortoinitiationofinfliximabtherapyforNewPatients:'NewPatients'arepatientswhohaveneverbeentreatedwithinfliximabbyanyhealthcareprovider.ModeratelytoSeverelyActiveCrohn'sDisease:Priortoinitiationofinfliximabtherapy,NewPatientsmusthaveacurrentModified(withoutthephysicalexam)HarveyBradshawIndexscoreofgreaterthanorequalto7(NewPatient'sBaselineScore),ANDbeRefractory.Refractoryisdefinedasoneormoreofthefollowing:1)Seriousadverseeffectsorreactionstothetreatmentsspecifiedbelow;OR2)Contraindications(asdefinedinproductmonographs)tothetreatmentsspecifiedbelow;OR3)Previousdocumentedlackofeffectatdosesandfordurationofalltreatmentsspecifiedbelow:a)mesalamine:minimumof3grams/dayforaminimumof6weeks;ANDrefractoryto,ordependenton,glucocorticoids:followingatleastonetaperingdosingscheduleof40mg/day,taperingby5mgeachweekto20mg,thentaperingby2.5mgeachweektozero,orsimilar;Note:PatientswhohaveusedtheabovetreatmentsincombinationwillnotberequiredtobechallengedwithindividualtreatmentsasmonotherapyAND

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

CommonDrugReview November2017 54

DrugPlan CriteriaforRestrictedBenefitb)Immunosuppressivetherapyasfollows:-Azathioprine:minimumof2mg/kg/dayforaminimumof3months;OR-6-mercaptopurine:minimumof1mg/kg/dayforaminimumof3months;OR-Methotrexate:minimumor15mg/weekforaminimumof3months.OR-Immunosuppressivetherapydiscontinuedatlessthan3monthsduetoseriousadverseeffectsorreactions.Applicationsforcoveragemustincludeinformationregardingthedosagesanddurationoftrialofeachtreatmentthepatientreceivedadescriptionofanyadverseeffects,reactions,contraindicationsand/orlackofeffect,aswellasanyotherinformationrequestedbyAlbertaBlueCross.FistulisingCrohn'sDisease:Priortoinitiationofinfliximabtherapy,NewPatientsmusthaveactivelydrainingperianalorenterocutaneousfistula(s)thathaverecurredorpersisteddespite:a)Acourseofanappropriatedoseofantibiotictherapy(e.g.ciprofloxacinormetronidazole)foraminimumof3weeks;ANDb)Immunosuppressivetherapy:-Azathioprine:minimumof2mg/kg/dayforaminimumof6weeks;OR-6-mercaptopurine:minimumof1mg/kg/dayforaminimumof6weeks;OR-Immunosuppressivetherapydiscontinuedatlessthan6weeksduetoseriousadverseeffectsorreactions.[Note:PatientswhohaveusedtheabovetreatmentsincombinationforthetreatmentofFistulisingCrohn'swillnotberequiredtobechallengedwithindividualtreatmentsasmonotherapy]Applicationsforcoveragemustincludeinformationregardingthedosagesanddurationoftrialofeachtreatmentthepatientreceivedadescriptionofanyadverseeffects,reactions,contraindicationsand/orlackofeffect,aswellasanyotherinformationrequestedbyAlbertaBlueCross.CoverageCriteriaforModeratelytoSeverelyActiveCrohn'sDiseaseAND/ORFistulisingCrohn'sDisease-NewPatientsmustmeetthecriteriaabovepriortobeingconsideredforapproval.-Allapprovalsarealsosubjecttothefollowingapplicablecriteria.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

CommonDrugReview November2017 55

DrugPlan CriteriaforRestrictedBenefitInductionDosingforNewPatients:-CoverageforInductionDosingmayonlybeapprovedforNewPatients(thosewhohaveneverbeentreatedwithinfliximabbyanyhealthcareprovider).-'InductionDosing'meansamaximumofone5mg/kgdoseofinfliximabperNewPatientateach0,2and6weeks(foramaximumtotalofthreedoses).-NewPatientsareeligibletoreceiveInductionDosingonlyonce,afterwhichtimetheMaintenanceDosingforNewPatientsandContinuedCoverageforMaintenanceDosingcriteriawillapply.MaintenanceDosing:'MaintenanceDosing'meansone5mg/kgdoseofinfliximabperpatientprovidednomoreoftenthanevery8weeksforaperiodof12monthsto:-NewPatientsfollowingthecompletionofInductionDosing;OR-ExistingPatients,whoarepatientsthatarebeingtreated,orhavepreviouslybeentreated,withinfliximab.MaintenanceDosingforNewPatientsafterCompletionofInductionDosing:-TheNewPatientmustbeassessedbyaSpecialistbetweenweeks10and14aftertheinitiationofInductionDosingtodetermineresponsebyobtainingaModifiedHarveyBradshawIndexscoreforpatientswithModeratelytoSeverelyActiveCrohn'sDiseaseand/orclosureofindividualfistulasasevidencedbynoorminimalfistuladrainagedespitegentlefingercompressionoffistulasthatweredrainingatbaselineforFistulisingCrohn's;AND-TheSpecialistmustconfirmtheModifiedHarveyBradshawIndexscoreshowsadecreasefromtheNewPatient'sBaselineScoreofgreaterthanorequalto3pointsforpatientswithModeratelytoSeverelyActiveCrohn'sand/orconfirmclosureofindividualfistulasasevidencedbynoorminimalfistuladrainagedespitegentlefingercompressionoffistulasthatweredrainingatbaselineforFistulisingCrohn's.MaintenanceDosingforExistingPatients:-ThepatientmustbeassessedbyaSpecialistatleast4to8weeksafterthedaythelastdoseofinfliximabwasadministeredtothepatientandpriortoadministrationofthenextdosetoobtain:aModifiedHarveyBradshawIndexScore(ExistingPatient'sBaselineScore)forModeratelytoSeverelyActiveCrohn'sand/orclosureofindividualfistulasasevidencedbynoorminimalfistuladrainagedespitegentlefingercompressionoffistulasthatweredrainingatbaselineforFistulisingCrohn's;AND-thesemeasuresmustbeprovidedtoAlbertaBlueCrossforassessmentforcontinuedcoverageformaintenancedosing.(ForexistingpatientswithModeratelytoSeverelyActiveCrohn'sDiseasewithanincompleteresponseorforexistingpatients

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

CommonDrugReview November2017 56

DrugPlan CriteriaforRestrictedBenefitwithFistulisingCrohn'swhorespondthenlosetheirresponse,thedosemaybeadjustedto10mg/kgbymakinganadditionalspecialauthorizationrequesttoAlbertaBlueCrossfortheincreaseddose.)ContinuedCoverageforMaintenanceDosing:Continuedcoveragemaybeconsideredforone5mg/kgdoseofinfliximabperpatientprovidednomoreoftenthanevery8weeksforaperiodof12months,ifthefollowingcriteriaaremetattheendofeach12monthperiod:-TheNewPatientortheExistingPatientmustbeassessedbyaSpecialistatleast4to6weeksafterthedaythelastdoseofinfliximabwasadministeredtothepatientandpriortotheadministrationofthenextdosetoobtainaModifiedHarveyBradshawIndexScoreforModeratelytoSeverelyActiveCrohn'sand/orclosureofindividualfistulasasevidencedbynoorminimalfistuladrainagedespitegentlefingercompressionoffistulasthatweredrainingatbaselineforFistulisingCrohn's;AND-ForNewPatients:TheSpecialistmustconfirmthatthepatienthasmaintainedagreaterthanorequalto3pointdecreasefromtheNewPatient'sBaselineScoreforModeratelytoSeverelyActiveCrohn'sand/orclosureofindividualfistulasasevidencedbynoorminimalfistuladrainagedespitegentlefingercompressionoffistulasthatweredrainingatbaselineforFistulisingCrohn's;OR-ForExistingPatients:TheSpecialistmustconfirmthatthepatienthasmaintainedtheExistingPatient'sBaselineScoreand/orclosureofindividualfistulasasevidencedbynoorminimalfistuladrainagedespitegentlefingercompressionoffistulasthatweredrainingatbaselineforFistulisingCrohn's.(FornewandexistingpatientswithModeratelytoSeverelyActiveCrohn'sDiseasewithanincompleteresponseorfornewandexistingpatientswithFistulisingCrohn'swhorespondthenlosetheirresponse,themaintenancedosemaybeadjustedto10mg/kgbymakinganadditionalspecialauthorizationrequesttoAlbertaBlueCrossfortheincreaseddose.)"Allrequests(includingrenewalrequests)forinfliximabforModeratelytoSeverelyActiveCrohn'sDiseaseandFistulisingCrohn'sDiseasemustbecompletedusingtheAdalimumabforCrohn's/InfliximabforCrohn's/FistulisingCrohn'sDiseaseSpecialAuthorizationRequestForm(ABC31200).

SK ModeratetosevereCrohn'sDisease:-Fortreatmentofpatientswhodemonstratecontinuingsymptomsdespitetheuseofoptimalconventionaltherapiessuchas5-ASAagents,glucocorticoidsandimmunosuppressivetherapy.-Fortreatmentofpatientswhoareintoleranttoconventionaltherapyincluding5-ASAagents,glucocorticoidsandimmunosuppressivetherapy.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

CommonDrugReview November2017 57

DrugPlan CriteriaforRestrictedBenefitFistulisingCrohn'sDisease:-Fortreatmentofpatientswithsymptomaticenterocutaneousorperinealfistulae,enterovaginalfistulaeorenterovesicalfistulae(i.e.anytypeoffistulisingCrohn’sDisease).Clinicalresponseshouldbeassessedaftertheinductiondose.Ongoingcoveragewillonlybeprovidedforthosewhorespondtotreatment.Patientsundergoingthistreatmentshouldbereviewedeverysixmonthsbyaspecialistinthisarea.

MB ForthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverelyactiveCrohn'sDiseaseand/orFistulisingCrohn'sDiseaseinpatientsrefractoryorwithcontraindicationstoanadequatecourseof5-aminosalicyclicacidandcorticosteroidsand/orotherimmunosuppressivetherapy.Requestforcoveragemustbemadebyaphysicianwhoisaspecialistingastroenterology.

ON TreatmentoffistulisingCrohn’sDiseaseinpatientswhohave:-Activelydrainingperianalorenterocutaneousfistula(e)thathaverecurredorpersisteddespiteacourseofantibiotictherapy(ciprofloxacinand/ormetronidazole)andimmunosuppressivetherapy(azathioprineor6-mercaptopurine).Note:Anyintolerance(s)orcontraindication(s)totreatmentwithrequiredalternative(s)mustbedescribedindetail.Renewalwillbeconsideredforpatientswithresolutionoffistulae.Theplanneddosingregimenfortherequestedbiologicshouldbeprovided.TherecommendeddoseforthetreatmentofCrohn’sDiseaseis5mg/kg/doseat0,2and6weeksfollowedby5mg/kg/doseevery8weeks.Initial:3monthsFirstrenewal:1yearSecondandsubsequentrenewals:2years

NB -FormoderatelytoseverelyactiveCrohn'sdiseaseinpatientswhoarerefractoryorhavecontraindicationstoanadequatecourseof5-aminosalicylicacidandcorticosteroidsandotherimmunosuppressivetherapy.Initialapprovalwillconsistof3dosesof5mg/kggivenatweeks0,2and6.ClinicalNote:-Infliximabwillnotbereimbursedincombinationwithotheranti-TNFagents.ClaimNotes:-Ongoingcoverageformaintenancetherapywillonlybereimbursedforrespondersandforadosenotexceeding5mg/kgevery8weeks.Coveragemustbereassessedannuallyandisdependentonevidenceofcontinuedresponse.-Mustbeprescribedby,orinconsultationwith,agastroenterologistorphysicianwithaspecialtyingastroenterology

NS FortreatmentofCrohn’sdiseaseinadults,whenprescribedbyagastroenterologistorphysicianwithaspecialtyingastroenterology:-inpatientswithmoderatetosevereactivediseaserefractoryto5-ASAproductsANDglucocorticoids(e.g.,prednisone)ANDimmunosuppressivetherapy(azathioprineor6-mercaptopurineormethotrexate)**.Initialapprovalofinfliximabwillbefora

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

CommonDrugReview November2017 58

DrugPlan CriteriaforRestrictedBenefitsingleinfusionof5mg/kg/dose.Asecondinfusionmaybewarrantedinpatientsnotrespondingtothefirstinfusionorinpatientsrespondinginitiallybutthenworseningbeforemaintenancetherapyiseffective.Requestforapprovalbeyondinductiontherapywillbeconsideredonacase-by-casebasis-inpatientswithfistulisingdiseasewhohaveactivelydrainingperianalorenterocutaneousfistula(e)thathaverecurredorpersisteddespiteacourseofappropriateantibiotictherapy(e.g.,metronidazole+/-ciprofloxacinforaminimumof3weeks)ANDimmunosuppressivetherapy(azathioprineor6-mercaptopurineormethotrexate)**.Initialapprovalisforthreeinfusionsofinfliximabof5mg/kg/doseat0,2and6weekintervals**PatientswhoareveryillandnotcandidatesforsurgerymayqualifyforinfliximabtherapywithoutatrialofAZA,6-MPorMTX,astheymayrequireamorerapidonsetofresponse

PE ForthetreatmentofmoderatetosevereCrohn=sDiseaseinpatientswho:1. HaveaHarveyBradshawIndexscoreof7ormore,AND2. Havenotrespondedto5-ASAproducts(minimumtrialof3gramsperdayfor6weeks),AND3. Havenotrespondedtoorareintoleranttoglucocorticosteroidtherapy(e.g.Prednisone)orwheresuchtherapyis

contraindicated,AND4. Havenotrespondedtoorareintoleranttoimmunosupressivetherapy(Azathioprine,MercaptopurineorMethotrexate)

orwheresuchtherapyiscontraindicated.InitialapprovalforInfliximabwillallowfor3dosesof5mg/kg/doseadministeredat0,2,and6weeks.RenewalofcoveragewillrequirereassessmentofthepatientandsubmissionofanewCrohn=sDiseaseSpecialAuthorizationform.Continuedcoveragewillbeapprovedatadosenotexceeding5mg/kgevery8weeksForthetreatmentoffistulisingCrohn’sDiseaseinpatientswho:1. HaveaHarveyBradshawIndexscoreof7ormore,AND2. Haveanactivelydrainingperianalorenercutaneiousfistula(e)thathaverecurredorpersisteddespiteacourseof

appropriateantibiotictherapy(e.g.CiprofloxacinwithorwithoutMetronidazoleforaminimumof3weeks),AND3. Havenotrespondedtoorareintoleranttoimmunosupressivetherapy(Azathioprine,MercaptopurineorMethotrexate)

orwheresuchtherapyiscontraindicated.InitialapprovalforInfliximabwillallowfor3dosesof5mg/kg/doseadministeredat0,2,and6weeks.RenewalofcoveragewillrequirereassessmentofthepatientandsubmissionofanewCrohn’sDiseaseSpecialAuthorizationform.Continuedcoveragewillbeapprovedatadosenotexceeding5mg/kgevery8weeks.

NL Forthetreatmentofpatientswithmoderateorsevereactivedisease*withcontraindicationstoornotachievingremissionwithglucocorticosteroidsANDimmunosuppressivetherapy.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

CommonDrugReview November2017 59

DrugPlan CriteriaforRestrictedBenefitInitialrequestmustincludecurrentCrohn’sDiseaseActivityIndex(CDAI)ortheHarvey-BradshawIndexAssessment(HBI)score.Initialapproval,3infusionsofinfliximab5mg/kgatweek0,2&6.Continuedcoveragedependentonevidenceofresponseusingcriteriasuchthe100pointreductioninCrohn’sDiseaseActivityIndex(CDAI)ortheHarvey-BradshawIndexAssessment(HBI)withascoreof5orlessoradecreaseinscoreof4ormore.Coveragecanbereassessedannuallydependentonevidenceofresponse(asoutlinedabove)Themaximumapproveddoseis5mg/kgevery8weeks.*Patientsveryill&notcandidatesforsurgerymayqualifyforimmediateinfliximabinductiontherapy,astheymayrequireamorerapidresponse.Concurrentuseofbiologicsnotapproved.WrittenrequestbyGastroenterologistorphysicianwithaspecialtyingastroenterology

YK FormoderatetoseverelyactiveCrohn'sDiseaseonrecommendationofaspecialist.Consulttobeprovided.ForpatientswithacurrentHarveyBradshawIndex(HBI)>7,whoareintolerantorrefractoryto5-ASA(3gdailyforatleast6weeks)ANDarerefractory,intolerantordependantonglucocorticoids,ANDwhoarerefractoryorintoleranttoatleastoneofazathioprine,6-mercaptopurineormethotrexateaftera3monthtrial.

ForfistulisingCrohn'sDiseaseonrecommendationofaspecialist.Consulttobeprovided.Forpatientswithactivelydrainingfistula(s)despitea3weektrialofciprofloxacinormetronidazole,ANDatleasta6weektrialofazathioprineor6-mercaptopurine

NT FistulisingCrohn’sdiseaseaccordingtoestablishedcriteria.-ForadultpatientswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveCrohn’sDiseasewhohavehadaninadequateresponsetoconventionaltherapy.ForthetreatmentofFISTULIZINGCROHN’SDISEASECriteriaforinitialforoneyear:-PrescribedbyagastroenterologyspecialistTheinitialcoveragewillallowfor3dosesof5mg/kg/dose,administeredat0,2and6weeks.Forcontinuedcoverage,patientmustbereassessedaftertheinitialdoses.Patientmeetsallthefollowingcriteria:-Patientisanadultwithactivelydrainingperianalorentercutaneousfistula(e)thathaverecurredorpersisteddespite:-acourseofappropriateantibiotictherapy(e.g.ciprofloxacinwithorwithoutmetronidazoleforaminimumof3weeks)PLUS-immunosuppressivetherapy:

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

CommonDrugReview November2017 60

DrugPlan CriteriaforRestrictedBenefit-azathioprine2to2.5mg/kg/dayforaminimumof6weeksortreatmentdiscontinuedbefore6weeksduetosevereadversereactions.OR-6-mercaptopurine,50-70mg/dayforaminimumof6weeksortreatmentdiscontinuedbefore6weeksduetosevereadversereactions.ORForthetreatmentforSEVEREACTIVECROHN`SDISEASECriteriaforinitialforoneyear:-PrescribedbyagastroenterologyspecialistTheinitialcoveragewillallowfor3dosesof5mg/kg/dose,administeredat0,2and6weeks.Forcontinuedcoverage,patientmustbereassessedaftertheinitialdoses.Patientmeetsthefollowingcriteria:PatientisanadultwithsevereactiveCrohn’sdiseasethathasrecurredorpersisteddespite:-Therapywith5-ASAproducts(atleast3g/dayforaminimumof6weeks).PLUS-Glucocorticoidsequivalenttoprednisone40mg/dayforaminimumof2weeks.OR-TreatmentdiscontinuedduetoseriousadversereactionsOROR-Contraindicationtoglucocorticoidtherapy.PLUS-Azathioprine2to2.5mg/kg/dayforaminimumof3months.OR-6-mercaptopurine50to70mg/dayforaminimumof3months.OR-Methotrexate15to25mg/weekforaminimumof3months.

NIHB FistulisingCrohn’sdiseaseaccordingtoestablishedcriteria.-ForadultpatientswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveCrohn’sDiseasewhohavehadaninadequateresponsetoconventionaltherapy.ForthetreatmentofFISTULIZINGCROHN’SDISEASECriteriaforinitialforoneyear:

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

CommonDrugReview November2017 61

DrugPlan CriteriaforRestrictedBenefit-PrescribedbyagastroenterologyspecialistTheinitialcoveragewillallowfor3dosesof5mg/kg/dose,administeredat0,2and6weeks.Forcontinuedcoverage,patientmustbereassessedaftertheinitialdoses.Patientmeetsallthefollowingcriteria:-Patientisanadultwithactivelydrainingperianalorentercutaneousfistula(e)thathaverecurredorpersisteddespite:-acourseofappropriateantibiotictherapy(e.g.ciprofloxacinwithorwithoutmetronidazoleforaminimumof3weeks)PLUS-immunosuppressivetherapy:-azathioprine2to2.5mg/kg/dayforaminimumof6weeksortreatmentdiscontinuedbefore6weeksduetosevereadversereactions.OR-6-mercaptopurine,50-70mg/dayforaminimumof6weeksortreatmentdiscontinuedbefore6weeksduetosevereadversereactions.ForthetreatmentforSEVEREACTIVECROHN`SDISEASECriteriaforinitialforoneyear:-PrescribedbyagastroenterologyspecialistTheinitialcoveragewillallowfor3dosesof5mg/kg/dose,administeredat0,2and6weeks.Forcontinuedcoverage,patientmustbereassessedaftertheinitialdoses.Patientmeetsthefollowingcriteria:PatientisanadultwithsevereactiveCrohn’sdiseasethathasrecurredorpersisteddespite:-Therapywith5-ASAproducts(atleast3g/dayforaminimumof6weeks).PLUS-Glucocorticoidsequivalenttoprednisone40mg/dayforaminimumof2weeks.OR-TreatmentdiscontinuedduetoseriousadversereactionsOROR-Contraindicationtoglucocorticoidtherapy.PLUS-Azathioprine2to2.5mg/kg/dayforaminimumof3months.OR-6-mercaptopurine50to70mg/dayforaminimumof3months.OR

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

CommonDrugReview November2017 62

DrugPlan CriteriaforRestrictedBenefit-Methotrexate15to25mg/weekforaminimumof3months.

DND Crohn’sDisease:-whenprescribedbyagastroenterologistforpatientswithmoderatetosevereCrohn’sDiseasewhoarerefractoryorintolerantto:-5-ASAproductsat3g/dayfor6weeksANDprednisone40mg/dayfor2weeksANDImmunosuppressivetherapyasfollows:-azathioprine2-2.5mg/kg/dayfor3monthsOR-mercaptopurine50-75mg/dayfor3monthsOR-methotrexate15-25mg/weekfor3monthsOR-Immunosuppressivetherapydiscontinuedatlessthan3monthsduetoseriousadverseeffectsorreactionsFistulisingCrohn’s:-whenprescribedbyagastroenterologistforpatientswithactivedrainingfistulasdespite:-ciprofloxacin+metronidazolefor3weeksAND-azathioprineforaminimumof6weeksOR-6-mercaptopurinefor6weeks

VAC CriteriaNotPublicallyAvailableviaVACWebsite

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

CommonDrugReview November2017 63

RestrictedBenefitCriteriaforREMICADE®forthetreatmentofUlcerativeColitis

DrugPlan CriteriaforRestrictedBenefitBC NotaBenefit

AB SpecialauthorizationcoveragemaybeprovidedforthereductioninsignsandsymptomsandinductionandmaintenanceofclinicalremissionofUlcerativeColitisinadultpatients(18yearsofageorolder)withactivedisease(characterizedbyapartialMayoscore>4priortoinitiationofbiologictherapy)andwhoarerefractoryorintolerantto:-mesalamine:minimumof4grams/dayforaminimumof4weeksAND-corticosteroids(failuretorespondtoprednisone40mgdailyfor2weeks,or;steroiddependenti.e.failuretotaperoffsteroidswithoutrecurrenceofdiseaseordiseaserequiringaseconddoseofsteroidswithin12monthsofpreviousdose).'Refractory'isdefinedaslackofeffectattherecommendeddosesandfordurationoftreatmentsspecifiedabove.'Intolerant'isdefinedasdemonstratingseriousadverseeffectsorcontraindicationstotreatmentsasdefinedinproductmonographs.Immunosuppressivetherapyasfollowsmayalsobeinitiatedifintheclinician'sjudgmentatrialiswarranted:i)Azathioprine:minimumof2mg/kg/dayforaminimumof2months;ORii)6-mercaptopurine:minimumof1mg/kg/dayforaminimumof2monthsForcoverage,thisdrugmustbeprescribedbyaSpecialistinGastroenterologyoraphysicianappropriatelytrainedbytheUniversityofAlbertaortheUniversityofCalgaryandrecognizedasaprescriberbyAlbertaBlueCross('Specialist').Initialcoveragemaybeapprovedforthreedosesof5mg/kgofinfliximabat0,2and6weeks.-Patientswillbelimitedtoreceivingaonedoseofinfliximabperprescriptionattheirpharmacy.-Patientswillbepermittedtoswitchfromonebiologicagenttoanotherfollowinganadequatetrialofthefirstbiologicagentifunresponsivetotherapy,orduetoseriousadverseeffectsorcontraindications.Anadequatetrialisdefinedasataminimumthecompletionofinductiondosing(e.g.initialcoverageperiod).-Patientswillnotbepermittedtoswitchbacktoapreviouslytrialedbiologicagentiftheyweredeemedunresponsivetotherapy.-Patientsarelimitedtoreceivingonebiologicagentatatimeregardlessoftheconditionforwhichitisbeingprescribed.Forcontinuedcoveragebeyondthreedoses,thepatientmustmeetthefollowingcriteria:1)ThepatientmustbeassessedbyaSpecialistbetweenweeks10and14aftertheinitiationoftherapytodetermineresponse.2)TheSpecialistmustconfirminwritingthatthepatientisa'responder'thatmeetsthefollowingcriteria:-adecreaseinthepartialMayoscoreofgreaterthanorequalto2pointsFollowingthisassessment,continuedcoveragemaybeapprovedfordoseof5mg/kgevery8weeksforaperiodof12months.Ongoingcoveragemaybeconsideredonlyifthefollowingcriteriaaremetattheendofeach12-monthperiod:1)ThepatienthasbeenassessedbyaSpecialistinGastroenterologytodetermineresponse;

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

CommonDrugReview November2017 64

DrugPlan CriteriaforRestrictedBenefit2)TheSpecialistmustconfirminwritingthatthepatienthasmaintainedaresponsetotherapyasindicatedby:-adecreaseinthepartialMayoscoreofgreaterthanorequalto2pointsfromthescorepriortoinitiationofinfliximabtherapyNote:Forpatientswhoshowedaresponsetoinductiontherapythenexperiencedsecondarylossofresponsewhileonmaintenancedosingwith5mg/kg,themaintenancedosemaybeadjustedfrom5mg/kgto10mg/kgbymakinganadditionalspecialauthorizationrequesttoAlbertaBlueCrossfortheincreaseddose.Allrequests(includingrenewalrequests)forinfliximabforUlcerativeColitismustbecompletedusingtheInfliximabforUlcerativeColitisSpecialAuthorizationRequestForm(ABC60008).

SK Fortreatmentofulcerativecolitisinpatientsunresponsivetohighdoseintravenoussteroids.NOTE:Clinicalresponseshouldbeassessedafterthethree-doseinductionphasebeforeproceedingtomaintenancetherapy.Ongoingcoveragewillonlybeprovidedforthosewhorespondtotherapy.Patientsundergoingthistreatmentshouldbereviewedeverysixmonthsbyaspecialistinthisarea.3)Adequateresponsetotreatmentassessedat12weeksdefinedasatleast50%reductioninpre-treatmentbaselineBASDAIscoreorby>2unitsANDareductionof>2cminthespinalpainVAS.NOTE:Coveragewillnotbeprovidedwhenapatientswitchestoanotheranti-TNFagentifthepatientfailstorespondorifthereisalossofresponsetothefirstagent.Requestsforcoverageforthisindicationmustbemadebytherheumatologist.Asecondapplicationwouldalsoberequiredafter12weekstoassessandwouldneedtoshowanimprovementtothepatient’sconditiononeitherofthesemedications.PleaserefertotheFormularywebsitefortheapplicationform.Subsequentannualrenewalrequests(beyond15months)willbeconsideredforpatientswhoseBASDAIscoresdonotworsen(i.e.remainswithintwopointsofthesecondassessment).Foralloftheaboveindicationsthisproductshouldbeusedinconsultationwithaspecialistinthisarea.(h)Fortreatmentofulcerativecolitisinpatientsunresponsivetohighdoseintravenoussteroids.NOTE:Clinicalresponseshouldbeassessedafterthethree-doseinductionphasebeforeproceedingtomaintenancetherapy.Ongoingcoveragewillonlybeprovidedforthosewhorespondtotherapy.Patientsundergoingthistreatmentshouldbereviewedeverysixmonthsbyaspecialistinthisarea

MB Forthetreatmentofpatientswithmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitiswhohavehadaninadequateresponsetoconventionaltherapyincluding5-aminosalicylatecompoundscorticosteroidsandimmunomodulators.Requestforcoveragemustbemadebyaphysicianwhoisaspecialistingastroenterology

ON Induction1.Milddiseasea.Mayoscore<6ANDb.Patientswithmilddiseasewillbeconsideredonacase-by-casebasisBUTsubmissionmustincludetherationaleforcoverage

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

CommonDrugReview November2017 65

DrugPlan CriteriaforRestrictedBenefit2.Moderatediseasea.Mayoscorebetween6and10(inclusive)ANDb.*Endoscopicsubscoreof2ANDc.Failed2weeksoforalprednisone≥40mg(orIVequivalentforatleast1week)AND3monthsofAzathioprine(AZA)/6-Mercaptopurine(6MP)(orwheretheuseofimmunosuppressantsiscontraindicated)ORd.Stabilizedwith2weeksoforalprednisone≥40mg(ora1weekcourseofIVequivalent)buttheprednisonedosecannotbetapereddespite3monthsofAZA/6MP(orwheretheuseofimmunosuppressantsiscontraindicated)3.Severediseasea.Mayoscore>10ANDb.*Endoscopysubscore≥2c.Failed2weeksoforalprednisone≥40mg(or1weekIVequivalent)ORd.Stabilizedwith2weeksoforalprednisone≥40mg(or1weekofIVequivalent)buttheprednisonedosecannotbetapereddespite3monthsofAZA/6MP(orwheretheuseofimmunosuppressantsiscontraindicated)*Theendoscopyproceduremustbedonewithinthelastyearbutdoesnothavetobefullendoscopy.MaintenanceCriteria:1.After3loadingdosesofREMICADE®:a.Mayoscore<6ANDb.50%reductioninprednisonefromthestartingdoseApproval:3monthsat5mg/kg/doseevery8weeksIfpatientiscompletelyoffsteroids.Approval:12monthsat5mg/kg/doseevery8weeks2.Subsequentrenewals:a.Mayoscore<6;ANDb.Mustbeoffsteroids(Patientswhoremainonsteroidswillbeconsideredonacase-by-casebasis)Approval:12monthsat5mg/kg/doseevery8weeks

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

CommonDrugReview November2017 66

DrugPlan CriteriaforRestrictedBenefitNB NotaBenefit

NS NotaBenefitPE NotaBenefit

NL NotaBenefitYK ForUlcerativeColitisonrecommendationofaspecialist.Consulttobeprovided.ForpatientswithaMayoscore>6ANDanendoscopic

subscore≥2(withinlast12months

ANDfailed2weeksoforalprednisone≥40mg(or1weekIVequivalent)AND3monthsofazathioprineor6-mercaptopurine

ORstabilizedonprednisoneasabovebuttheprednisonedosecannotbetapereddespite3monthsofDMARDS.

Onlyonemonth'sdosetobedispensedatatime.Approvalfor12monthperiodNT NotaBenefitNIHB NotaBenefit

DND NotaBenefit

VAC NotaBenefit

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

67CommonDrugReview November2017

APPENDIX3:SUMMARYOFPATIENTINPUT

1.DescriptionofPatientGroupsSupplyingInput:Twopatientgroupsprovidedinputforthissubmission:TheGastrointestinal(GI)SocietyandCrohn’sandColitisCanada(CCC).ThemissionoftheGISocietyistoprovideevidence-basedinformationonconditionsrelatedtotheGItractandliver,improvethelivesofpeoplelivingwiththeseconditions,supportresearch,advocateforhealthcareaccess,andpromoteGIandliverhealth.TheGISocietyprovidespamphletsandonlineinformation,deliverslectures,andrespondstoinformationrequestsfrompatientsandhealthcareprofessionals.English(www.badgut.org)andFrench(www.mauxdeventre.org)websitesareavailable.Financialcontributionsarereceivedfrompharmaceuticalcompanies(Pfizer,AbbVieCorporation,Actavis,AstraZenecaCanadaInc.,InnovativeMedicinesCanada,FerringInc.,GileadSciencesCanadaInc.,GlaxoSmithKlineInc.,JanssenCanada,MerckCanadaInc.,PfizerCanadaInc.,ShireCanadaInc.,andTakedaCanadaInc.),governments,foundations,andindividuals.Noconflictofinterestwasdeclaredinpreparingthepatientinputforthissubmission.CCCisanational,volunteer-basedcharitythatworksonfindingcuresforCrohn’sdisease(CD)andulcerativecolitis(UC),improvingthelivesofpeoplelivingwiththeseconditions,providingpatientprograms,advocatingonbehalfofpatients,andincreasingawareness.Itisamongtheforemostcharityfundersofinflammatoryboweldisease(IBD)researchintheworld.Theorganizationhaschaptersin45communitiesacrossCanada.During2014-2015,11%ofCCC’srevenueswerefromcorporatedonations.Majorsupporterswere:AbbVieCorporation,JanssenInc.,TheLeonaM.andHarryB.HelmsleyCharitableTrust,M&MMeatShops,TakedaCanadaInc.,andVertexPharmaceuticals(Canada)Inc.Noconflictofinterestwasdeclaredinpreparingthepatientinputforthissubmission.2.ConditionRelatedInformation:TheCCCobtainedinformationfromCCCpublishedreports,CCCsurveys,andeducationalbrochuresavailableontheorganization’swebsite(www.crohnsandcolitis.ca).ThesourcesofinformationconsultedbytheGISocietywerenotprovided.TheGISocietyindicatedthattherearedifferencesbetweenUCandCDwithrespecttotheextentandareasofinflammationexperiencedbypatientswiththeseconditions.TheinflammationofCDaffectsmoreareasoftheintestinaltractandisdeeperinextentcomparedwithUC.InadditiontoGIsymptoms,patientswitheitherUCorCDmayexperienceextra-intestinalmanifestations,suchasfever,inflammationofeyesorjoints,ulcersofmouthorskin,tenderandinflamednodulesontheshins,anxiety,andstress.Symptomsmayhaveprofoundeffectsonthephysical,social,andemotionalaspectsofpatients’lives.Patientsalsoreportbeingconstantlyconcernedaboutdiseaseflare-ups,whichmaybeworseinseveritycomparedwithpreviousflaresandoccurunpredictably.Thiscausesgreatdisruptiontopatients’lives.Sustainedremissionortreatmentresponse,therefore,isdesiredbypatients.TheCCCreportedthatthemostunbearablesymptomsexperiencedbypatientsarelackofcontroloverbowelmovementsandurgentandfrequentneedtousethebathroom.ACCC2011surveyfoundthat73%ofpatientsexperienced5to20ormorebowelmovementsperday.Althoughpatientsindicatedbloodinthestoolandabdominalpainasimportantsymptoms,thedominatingconcernwasaccesstoawashroom.Somepatientswerealsoconcernedabouttheincreasedriskofcoloncancer.Limitationsin

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

68CommonDrugReview November2017

leisureactivities(e.g.,goingoutfordinners,movies,andconcerts),physicalactivities,useofpublictransportation,andworkwerereported.Accordingtoonerespondent,“Yousimplycan’tleadanormallifeofworkingandgoingtotheoffice.”Thirty-fourpercentfrequentlymissedplayingsports,22%missedschooltrips,20%skippedfamilyvacations,40%avoidedparties,and22%didnotattendspecialeventssuchasgraduationsorfamilyweddings.Inaddition,patientsreportedexperiencinggreaterscrutinyfrombossesduetofrequentwashroombreaksorsickdays.IBDsareattachedwithstigma,whichmakesitdifficultforpatientstoopenlytalkabouttheircondition.Caregiversarealsoaffectedbythecondition,oftenactingasadvocatesfortheirlovedoneanddevotingtimeandresourcestohelpmanagethepotentiallimitationsincarryingoutday-to-dayactivities.Theprocessofcaring,however,mayaffectthecaregiver’smentalandphysicalhealth,andoftenexertsfinancialburdenincludingout-of-pocketexpensesassociatedwithdiseasemanagement.3.CurrentTherapy-RelatedInformation:TheCCCobtainedinformationfrompatientreportsofinnovatordrugs,whichwereincludedinpreviousdrugsubmissionstoCADTH.ThesourcesofinformationconsultedbytheGISocietywerenotprovided.AsurveywasconductedbytheGISocietyin2015ontheirEnglishandFrenchwebsitestounderstandtheperspectivesofpatientswithIBDorcaregiversofapersonwithIBDregardingsubsequententrybiologics(SEBs).Atotalof423respondentsparticipated,fromallprovincesandterritories.Thegoalsoftherapyareinductionofremissionandmaintenanceofremission.Thisisachievedbyusingtreatmentsthatcontrolinflammationintheintestinaltract.Oldertreatmentsinclude5-aminosalicylicacid(5-ASA),corticosteroids,andimmunosuppressivedrugs.AccordingtotheGISociety,theintroductionofbiologicdrugswaslife-changingand“revolutionary”whenoldertreatmentsfailedtoachievethegoalsoftherapy.However,biologicsdohavesideeffectsandrisksand,therefore,areprescribedonlyiftheyarethebestoptionforcontrollinginflammation.ThecourseofIBDisoftenunpredictableanduniqueamongpatientsand,thus,treatmentmustbeindividualized;atreatmentregimenthatworksforonepatientmaynotbesuitableforanother.Availabilityandchoiceofdifferenttreatmentsoptionsareamust.SincethereisnocureforIBD,isitimportanttomaintainongoingmedicalcare,propernutrition,andmedication.PatientswhoreportedtotheCCCindicatedthattheyrespondedwelltotheinnovatorbiologic.Afterfailureoffirst-linetreatments,innovatorbiologicdrugshaveallowedpatientstoachieveremissionandexperienceareductioninthenumberofbowelmovements,decreasedfatigue,lesspain,andlesspsychologicalstressassociatedwithneedforwashroomaccess.Accordingtoonerespondent,“withsteroidsIwasat60%butwith[innovatorbiologics]I’mat95%.”Patientsreportedthatinnovatorbiologicshelpedthemachieveasclosetoanormallifeaspossible.Biologicdrugsofferanalternativetosurgerywhenothertreatmentshavefailed.Thispreventsthecomplicationsofsurgery,suchascontinence/soiling,poorpouchfunction,pouchitis,sexualdysfunction,andlossoffertilityinfemales.4.ExpectationsfortheDrugBeingReviewed:TheinformationforthissectionwasobtainedfromthesurveyconductedbytheGIsociety.Patientsexpectthattreatmentwillimprovetheirqualityoflife,whichmeansreliefofsymptoms,alleviationofanxietyandstress,abilitytoleadanormallifewithfamily,career/education,andwithoutinterruptionsduetoflare-ups.TheyexpectthatanapprovedSEBhasbeenproventobesafeandeffective,specificallyinIBD.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

69CommonDrugReview November2017

PatientsexpressedconcernsaboutthesafetyandefficacyofSEBs,theregulatoryprocessofSEBsinCanada,andswitchingbetweeninnovatorandSEBtreatments,especiallywithouttheirconsent.Theydonotwantcosttobetheonlyconsiderationwhendecidingwhichbiologictouse.Inaddition,itwasimportantforpatientsthatthephysicianchoosesinconsultationwiththemthebestdrugfortheircondition(andthatthechoiceisnotjustmadebyagovernmentordrugplan).PatientsexpectthatSEBregulationsconsider,inorderofpriority:safety,areviewandapprovalprocessthatisasrigorousasfortheinnovator,thattheSEBistestedforallindications/diseases,theimportanceofmoretreatmentoptions,andthattheSEBisclinicallytestedinCanadians.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

70CommonDrugReview November2017

REFERENCES

ManufacturerReferences(IdentifiedBySquareBracketswithintheReport)1. Park,S.H.,etal.,Post-marketingstudyofbiosimilarinfliximab(CT-P13)toevaluateitssafetyand

efficacyinKorea.ExpertRevGastroenterolHepatol,2015.9Suppl1:p.35-44.2. KoreanLabelforInflectra,ApprovedIndicationsforInflectrainKorea.2013,CellTrionInc:Seoul,

SouthKorea.3. Sands,B.E.,etal.,Long-termtreatmentofrectovaginalfistulasinCrohn'sdisease:responseto

infliximabintheACCENTIIStudy.ClinGastroenterolHepatol,2004.2(10):p.912-20.4. Rutgeerts,P.,etal.,Comparisonofscheduledandepisodictreatmentstrategiesofinfliximabin

Crohn'sdisease.Gastroenterology,2004.126(2):p.402-13.5. Sandborn,W.J.,etal.,One-yearmaintenanceoutcomesamongpatientswithmoderately-to-

severelyactiveulcerativecolitiswhorespondedtoinductiontherapywithadalimumab:subgroupanalysesfromULTRA2.AlimentPharmacolTher,2013.37(2):p.204-13.

6. Reinisch,W.,etal.,Adalimumabforinductionofclinicalremissioninmoderatelytoseverelyactiveulcerativecolitis:resultsofarandomisedcontrolledtrial.Gut,2011.60(6):p.780-7.

7. Fischer,M.,NeedforrescuetherapyinIBDpatientsoninfliximabmaintenancetherapyafterdiscontinuationofimmunomodulator.InflammatoryBoweldiseases,2009.15(Supplement2):p.S1-S2.

8. Lynch,R.W.,etal.,Outcomesofrescuetherapyinacutesevereulcerativecolitis:datafromtheUnitedKingdominflammatoryboweldiseaseaudit.AlimentPharmacolTher,2013.38(8):p.935-45.

9. vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

10. KoreanPMSTables,TabularDataforCT-P13PMSStudyinKoreanpatients.2015,CelltrionInc:Seoul,SouthKorea.

11. RemicadeProductMonograph,ProductMonographforREMICADE(infliximab)100mgpervial.2014,HealthCanada:Ottawa,Ontario.

12. RemicadeSummaryofProductCharacteristics,RemicadeSummaryofProductCharacteristics.2011,EuropeanMedicinesAgency.

13. RemicadeSystematicReview,SafetyofinfliximabinthetreatmentofpatientswithCrohn’sDiseaseandUlcerativeColitis:asystematicreviewofrandomized,controlledtrialsconductedwithRemicade®.2015,CelltrionInc.

14. RemicadeSystematicReviewforObservationStudies,EfficacyandsafetyofinfliximabinthetreatmentofpatientswithCrohn’sdiseaseandulcerativecolitis:asystematicreviewofRemicade®observationalstudies.2015,CellTrionInc:Seoul,SouthKorea.

15. vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

16. vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

17. vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

71CommonDrugReview November2017

18. vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

19. vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

20. CT-P13PKModellingReport,DoseProportionalityofCT-P13ExtrapolatedfromPopulationPharmacokineticAnalysis.2014,St.Mary’sHospital:Seoul,SouthKorea.

21. LakatosP,Biosimilarinfliximabininflammatoryboweldiseases:whatisthereallifeevidence?2015,Semmelweisniversity:Budapest,Hungary.

22. vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv.

23. Miheller,P.,etal.,EfficacyandsafetyofinfliximabinductiontherapyinCrohn'sDiseaseinCentralEurope--aHungariannationwideobservationalstudy.BMCGastroenterol,2009.9:p.66.

24. JahnsenJ,Post-marketingreal-worldclinicalexperiencewithREMSIMA™100mg(infliximab)(monoclonalantibody,recombinant)inpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseatAkershusUniversityHospital,Norway.2015,AkershusUniversityHospital:OsloNorway.

25. vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv.

26. vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv.

27. Ben-Horin,S.,Remicade®cross-immunoreactivitytowardsREMSIMA™inIBD.2014,ShebaMedicalCenterTelAvivUniversity:Israel.

28. Ben-Horin,S.,etal.,Cross-immunogenicity:antibodiestoinfliximabinRemicade-treatedpatientswithIBDsimilarlyrecognisethebiosimilarRemsima.Gut,2015.

29. GecseK.Biosimilarinfliximabininflammatoryboweldiseases:firstinterimresultsfromaprospectivenationwideobservationalcohort.2015[cited2016April6];Availablefrom:https://www.ecco-ibd.eu/index.php/publications/congress-abstract-s/abstracts-2015/item/p314-biosimilar-infliximab-in-inflammatory-bowel-diseases-first-interim-results-from-a-prospective-nationwide-observational-cohort.html.

30. vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

31. O'Shea,J.J.,A.Ma,andP.Lipsky,Cytokinesandautoimmunity.NatRevImmunol,2002.2(1):p.37-45.

32. Reinecker,H.C.,etal.,Enhancedsecretionoftumournecrosisfactor-alpha,IL-6,andIL-1betabyisolatedlaminapropriamononuclearcellsfrompatientswithulcerativecolitisandCrohn'sdisease.ClinExpImmunol,1993.94(1):p.174-81.

33. Lee,T.W.andR.N.Fedorak,Tumornecrosisfactor-alphamonoclonalantibodiesinthetreatmentofinflammatoryboweldisease:clinicalpracticepharmacology.GastroenterolClinNorthAm,2010.39(3):p.543-57.

34. DiSabatino,A.,etal.,FunctionalmodulationofCrohn'sdiseasemyofibroblastsbyanti-tumornecrosisfactorantibodies.Gastroenterology,2007.133(1):p.137-49.

35. Yoo,J.,etal.,ProteinkinaseD1mediatessynergisticMMP-3expressioninducedbyTNF-alphaandbradykinininhumancolonicmyofibroblasts.BiochemBiophysResCommun,2011.413(1):p.30-5.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

72CommonDrugReview November2017

36. Hamilton,K.E.,etal.,Cytokineinductionoftumornecrosisfactorreceptor2ismediatedbySTAT3incoloncancercells.MolCancerRes,2011.9(12):p.1718-31.

37. Zeissig,S.,etal.,DownregulationofepithelialapoptosisandbarrierrepairinactiveCrohn'sdiseasebytumournecrosisfactoralphaantibodytreatment.Gut,2004.53(9):p.1295-302.

38. Mankertz,J.andJ.D.Schulzke,Alteredpermeabilityininflammatoryboweldisease:pathophysiologyandclinicalimplications.CurrOpinGastroenterol,2007.23(4):p.379-83.

39. Bu,P.,etal.,Apoptosis:oneofthemechanismsthatmaintainsunresponsivenessoftheintestinalmucosalimmunesystem.JImmunol,2001.166(10):p.6399-403.

40. Ho,G.-T.,C.Lees,andJ.Satsangi,Ulcerativecolitis.Medicine,2011.39(4):p.224-228.41. Baughman,R.P.andM.Iannuzzi,Tumournecrosisfactorinsarcoidosisanditspotentialfor

targetedtherapy.BioDrugs,2003.17(6):p.425-31.42. vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv43. Scallon,B.,etal.,Bindingandfunctionalcomparisonsoftwotypesoftumornecrosisfactor

antagonists.JPharmacolExpTher,2002.301(2):p.418-26.44. Tracey,D.,etal.,Tumornecrosisfactorantagonistmechanismsofaction:acomprehensive

review.PharmacolTher,2008.117(2):p.244-79.45. Feldmann,M.,Developmentofanti-TNFtherapyforrheumatoidarthritis.NatRevImmunol,

2002.2(5):p.364-71.46. Bosani,M.,S.Ardizzone,andG.B.Porro,Biologictargetinginthetreatmentofinflammatory

boweldiseases.Biologics,2009.3:p.77-97.47. VanDeventer,S.J.,TumournecrosisfactorandCrohn'sdisease.Gut,1997.40(4):p.443-8.48. Kankaanranta,H.,etal.,Tumournecrosisfactor-alpharegulateshumaneosinophilapoptosisvia

ligationofTNF-receptor1andbalancebetweenNF-kappaBandAP-1.PLoSOne,2014.9(2):p.e90298.

49. Onnheim,K.,etal.,Tumournecrosisfactor(TNF)-alphaprimesmurineneutrophilswhentriggeredviaformylpeptidereceptor-relatedsequence2,themurineorthologueofhumanformylpeptidereceptor-like1,throughaprocessinvolvingthetypeITNFreceptorandsubcellulargranulemobilization.Immunology,2008.125(4):p.591-600.

50. Zeck-Kapp,G.,W.Czech,andA.Kapp,TNFalpha-inducedactivationofeosinophiloxidativemetabolismandmorphology--comparisonwithIL-5.ExpDermatol,1994.3(4):p.176-88.

51. Koshy,P.J.,etal.,Interleukin17inducescartilagecollagenbreakdown:novelsynergisticeffectsincombinationwithproinflammatorycytokines.AnnRheumDis,2002.61(8):p.704-13.

52. Goretsky,T.,etal.,p53mediatesTNF-inducedepithelialcellapoptosisinIBD.AmJPathol,2012.181(4):p.1306-15.

53. Nesbitt,A.,etal.,Mechanismofactionofcertolizumabpegol(CDP870):invitrocomparisonwithotheranti-tumornecrosisfactoralphaagents.InflammBowelDis,2007.13(11):p.1323-32.

54. Shen,C.,etal.,Adalimumabinducesapoptosisofhumanmonocytes:acomparativestudywithinfliximabandetanercept.AlimentPharmacolTher,2005.21(3):p.251-8.

55. Vos,A.C.,etal.,Regulatorymacrophagesinducedbyinfliximabareinvolvedinhealinginvivoandinvitro.InflammBowelDis,2012.18(3):p.401-8.

56. Vos,A.C.,etal.,Anti-tumornecrosisfactor-alphaantibodiesinduceregulatorymacrophagesinanFcregion-dependentmanner.Gastroenterology,2011.140(1):p.221-30.

57. Eissner,G.,etal.,ReversesignalingthroughtransmembraneTNFconfersresistancetolipopolysaccharideinhumanmonocytesandmacrophages.JImmunol,2000.164(12):p.6193-8.

58. Mitoma,H.,etal.,Mechanismsforcytotoxiceffectsofanti-tumornecrosisfactoragentsontransmembranetumornecrosisfactoralpha-expressingcells:comparisonamonginfliximab,etanercept,andadalimumab.ArthritisRheum,2008.58(5):p.1248-57.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

73CommonDrugReview November2017

59. Sindrilaru,A.andK.Scharffetter-Kochanek,DisclosureoftheCulprits:Macrophages-VersatileRegulatorsofWoundHealing.AdvWoundCare(NewRochelle),2013.2(7):p.357-368.

60. Zareie,M.,etal.,Monocyte/macrophageactivationbynormalbacteriaandbacterialproducts:implicationsforalteredepithelialfunctioninCrohn'sdisease.AmJPathol,2001.158(3):p.1101-9.

61. Zhu,W.,etal.,DisequilibriumofM1andM2macrophagescorrelateswiththedevelopmentofexperimentalinflammatoryboweldiseases.ImmunolInvest,2014.43(7):p.638-52.

62. Hunter,M.M.,etal.,Invitro-derivedalternativelyactivatedmacrophagesreducecolonicinflammationinmice.Gastroenterology,2010.138(4):p.1395-405.

63. Novak,M.L.andT.J.Koh,Macrophagephenotypesduringtissuerepair.JLeukocBiol,2013.93(6):p.875-81.

64. Benucci,M.,etal.,Tumornecrosisfactorsblockingagents:analogiesanddifferences.ActaBiomed,2012.83(1):p.72-80.

65. Arora,T.,etal.,DifferencesinbindingandeffectorfunctionsbetweenclassesofTNFantagonists.Cytokine,2009.45(2):p.124-31.

66. Shealy,D.J.,etal.,Characterizationofgolimumab,ahumanmonoclonalantibodyspecificforhumantumornecrosisfactoralpha.MAbs,2010.2(4):p.428-39.

67. Louis,E.J.,etal.,PolymorphisminIgGFcreceptorgeneFCGR3AandresponsetoinfliximabinCrohn'sdisease:asubanalysisoftheACCENTIstudy.PharmacogenetGenomics,2006.16(12):p.911-4.

68. Moroi,R.,etal.,FCGR3A-158polymorphisminfluencesthebiologicalresponsetoinfliximabinCrohn'sdiseasethroughaffectingtheADCCactivity.Immunogenetics,2013.65(4):p.265-71.

69. Papamichael,K.,etal.,AssociationofandgenepolymorphismswithdifferentialresponsetoinfliximabinaGreekcohortofCrohn'sdiseasepatients.AnnGastroenterol,2011.24(1):p.35-40.

70. Tomita,K.,etal.,Associationbetweentumornecrosisfactor-alphaandFc-gammareceptorpolymorphismswithinfliximabinCrohn'sdisease.Hepatogastroenterology,2010.57(99-100):p.535-9.

71. Louis,E.,etal.,AssociationbetweenpolymorphisminIgGFcreceptorIIIacodinggeneandbiologicalresponsetoinfliximabinCrohn'sdisease.AlimentPharmacolTher,2004.19(5):p.511-9.

72. HealthCanada.SummaryBasisofDecisionforInflectra.2014[cited2016March25];Availablefrom:http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/prodpharma/sbd-smd/drug-med/sbd_smd_2014_inflectra_159493-eng.php.

73. CHMPAssessmentReport,AssessmentReportforInflectra.2013,EuropeanMedicinesAgency:London,UnitedKingdom.

74. FDA.FDAapprovesInflectra,abiosimilartoRemiacde.2016[cited2016April6];Availablefrom:http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm494227.htm.

75. FDAAdvisoryCommittee.FDABriefingDocumentforCT-P13abiosimilartoRemicade.2016[cited2016March28];Availablefrom:http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/ArthritisAdvisoryCommittee/UCM484859.pdf?&.

76. PharmaceuticalBenefitsScheme.InflectraPublicSummaryDocument.2015[cited2016March28];Availablefrom:http://www.pbs.gov.au/info/industry/listing/elements/pbac-meetings/psd/2015-07/infliximab-psd-july-2015.

77. EPARRemicadeScientificDiscussion,EuropeanPublicAssessmentReportforRemicade.2005,EuropeanMedicineAgency.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

74CommonDrugReview November2017

78. FDAClinicalPharmacologyReviewofRemicade,FDAClinicalPharmacologyReviewofBLA99-0128.Remicade.1999,FoodandDrugAdministration(FDA).

79. StClair,E.W.,etal.,Therelationshipofseruminfliximabconcentrationstoclinicalimprovementinrheumatoidarthritis:resultsfromATTRACT,amulticenter,randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlledtrial.ArthritisRheum,2002.46(6):p.1451-9.

80. Yoo,D.H.,etal.,Arandomised,double-blind,parallel-groupstudytodemonstrateequivalenceinefficacyandsafetyofCT-P13comparedwithinnovatorinfliximabwhencoadministeredwithmethotrexateinpatientswithactiverheumatoidarthritis:thePLANETRAstudy.AnnRheumDis,2013.72(10):p.1613-20.

81. Maini,R.N.,etal.,Therapeuticefficacyofmultipleintravenousinfusionsofanti-tumornecrosisfactoralphamonoclonalantibodycombinedwithlow-doseweeklymethotrexateinrheumatoidarthritis.ArthritisRheum,1998.41(9):p.1552-63.

82. Klotz,U.,A.Teml,andM.Schwab,Clinicalpharmacokineticsanduseofinfliximab.ClinPharmacokinet,2007.46(8):p.645-60.

83. Kim,J.,etal.,KineticsofFcRn-mediatedrecyclingofIgGandalbumininhuman:pathophysiologyandtherapeuticimplicationsusingasimplifiedmechanism-basedmodel.ClinImmunol,2007.122(2):p.146-55.

84. Fasanmade,A.A.,etal.,Populationpharmacokineticanalysisofinfliximabinpatientswithulcerativecolitis.EurJClinPharmacol,2009.65(12):p.1211-28.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

75CommonDrugReview November2017

CDRReferences(IdentifiedBySuperscriptswithintheReport)

1. HealthCanadareviewer'sreport:Inflectra(infliximab)[CONFIDENTIALinternalreport].Ottawa:TherapeuticsProductsDirectorate,HealthCanada;2015Aug7.

2. vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

3. ParkSH,KimYH,LeeJH,KwonHJ,LeeSH,ParkDI,etal.Post-marketingstudyofbiosimilarinfliximab(CT-P13)toevaluateitssafetyandefficacyinKorea.ExpertRevGastroenterolHepatol.2015;9Suppl1:35-44.

4. JahnsenJ,DetlieTE,VatnS,RicanekP.Biosimilarinfliximab(CT-P13)inthetreatmentofinflammatoryboweldisease:ANorwegianobservationalstudy.ExpertRevGastroenterolHepatol.2015;9Suppl1:45-52.

5. GecseKB,LovaszBD,FarkasK,BanaiJ,BeneL,GasztonyiB,etal.EfficacyandsafetyofthebiosimilarinfliximabCT-P13treatmentininflammatoryboweldiseases:Aprospective,multicentre,nationwidecohort.JCrohnsColitis.2016Feb;10(2):133-40.

6. MolnarT,FarkasK,RutkaM,BalintA,NagyF,BorR,etal.EfficacyofthenewinfliximabbiomarkerCT-P13inductiontherapyonmucosalhealinginulcerativecolitispatients.Posterpresentedat:10thCongressoftheEuropeanCrohn'sandColitisOrganisation;2015Feb18-21;Barcelona,Spain.

7. Interimreport:post-marketingreal-worldclinicalexperiencewithREMISMa™100mg(infliximab)(monoclonalantibody,recombinant)inpatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseatIBDClinicalandResearchCentre,ISCARELighthouseandCharlesUniversity,Prague,CzechRepublic.Prague,CzechRepublic:CharlesUniversity;2015May4.

8. KangYS,MoonHH,LeeSE,LimYJ,KangHW.ClinicalexperienceoftheuseofCT-P13,abiosimilartoinfliximabinpatientswithinflammatoryboweldisease:Acaseseries.DigDisSci.2015Apr;60(4):951-6.

9. JungYS,ParkDI,KimYH,LeeJH,SeoPJ,CheonJH,etal.EfficacyandsafetyofCT-P13,abiosimilarofinfliximab,inpatientswithinflammatoryboweldisease:Aretrospectivemulticenterstudy.JGastroenterolHepatol.2015Dec;30(12):1705-12.

10. CDRsubmission:Inflectra(infliximab),1mg/vialsterile,lyophilizedpowderforsolution.Company:HospiraHealthCareCorporation,aPfizerCompany[CONFIDENTIALmanufacturer'ssubmission].Incheon(KR):HospiraHealthCareCorporation,aPfizerCompany;2016Apr.

11. vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv.

12. CelltrionresponsetoHealthCanadaclarifaxinformationrequestforInflectraIBDdatedMay62016[CONFIDENTIALinternalreport].Incheon(KR):CelltrionHealthcareCo.Ltd;2016.

13. ManufacturercommentsonCDRclinicalandpharmacoeconomicreviewers'reportsoninfliximab(Inflectra)[CONFIDENTIALmanufacturer'sreport].Incheon(KR):HospiraHealthCareCorporation,aPfizerCompany;2016Aug.

14. YoshidaEM.TheCrohn'sDiseaseActivityIndex,itsderivativesandtheInflammatoryBowelDiseaseQuestionnaire:areviewofinstrumentstoassessCrohn'sdisease.CanJGastroenterol.1999Jan;13(1):65-73.

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

76CommonDrugReview November2017

15. ZelinkovaZ,vanderWoudeCJ.Genderandinflammatoryboweldisease.JClinCellImmunol.2014;5:4.

16. FeaginsLA,KaneSV.Caringforwomenwithinflammatoryboweldisease.GastroenterolClinNorthAm.2016Jun;45(2):303-15.

17. Biologicandbiosimilartherapies:presentations[Internet].Edmonton:InstituteofHealthEconomics;2014.[cited2016Jun20].Availablefrom:http://www.ihe.ca/research-programs/knowledge-transfer-dissemination/conferences/biologics/bios-pres

18. CommonDrugReview.Inflectra(infliximab)[Internet].Ottawa:CADTH;2015.[cited2016Jun13].(Subsequententrybiologicreviewreport).Availablefrom:https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/cdr/seb/SE0384_Inflectra_SEB_Report.pdf

19. Inflectra(infliximab):powderforsolution,sterile,lyophilized,100mg/vial[productmonograph].Incheon,KR:CelltrionHealthcareCo.Ltd;2016Jun10.

20. Inflectra(infliximab)[Internet].London:EuropeanMedicinesAgency;2016.[cited2016Jun20].Availablefrom:http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/medicines/human/medicines/002778/human_med_001677.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058001d124

21. Highlightsofprescribinginformation:inflectra(infliximab-dyyb)forinjection,forintravenoususe[Internet].Incheon(KR):Celltrion,Inc.;2016.[cited2016Jun20].Availablefrom:http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/125544s000lbl.pdf

22. Inflectra™:productinformation[Internet].Canberra:GovernmentofAustralia,DepartmentofHealth;2016.[cited2016Jun20].Availablefrom:https://www.ebs.tga.gov.au/ebs/picmi/picmirepository.nsf/pdf?OpenAgent&id=CP-2015-PI-02425-1&d=2016061616114622483

23. OlesenCM,CoskunM,Peyrin-BirouletL,NielsenOH.Mechanismsbehindefficacyoftumornecrosisfactorinhibitorsininflammatoryboweldiseases.PharmacolTher.2016Mar;159:110-9.

24. FeaganBG,ChoquetteD,GhoshS,GladmanDD,HoV,MeibohmB,etal.Thechallengeofindicationextrapolationforinfliximabbiosimilars.Biologicals.2014Jul;42(4):177-83.

25. KopylovU,Ben-HorinS,SeidmanE.Therapeuticdrugmonitoringininflammatoryboweldisease.AnnGastroenterol[Internet].2014[cited2016May27];27(4):304-12.Availablefrom:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4188926

26. VermeireS,NomanM,VanAssche,BaertF,D'HaensG,RutgeertsP.EffectivenessofconcomitantimmunosuppressivetherapyinsuppressingtheformationofantibodiestoinfliximabinCrohn'sdisease.Gut[Internet].2007Sep[cited2016Aug5];56(9):1226-31.Availablefrom:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1954977

27. Pharmacoeconomicevaluation.In:CDRsubmission:Inflectra(infliximab),1mg/vialsterile,lyophilizedpowderforsolution.Company:HospiraHealthCareCorporation,aPfizerCompany[CONFIDENTIALmanufacturer'ssubmission].Montreal:HospiraHealthCareCorporation,aPfizerCompany;2016Apr.

28. ExceptionalAccessProgram(EAP)[Internet].Toronto:OntarioMinistryofHealthandLong-TermCare;2009;updated2016.[cited2016Jun30].Availablefrom:http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/drugs/odbf/odbf_except_access.aspx

29. CADTHCanadianDrugExpertCommittee(CDEC)finalrecommendation:infliximab(Inflectra-HospiraHealthcareCorporation)[Internet].Ottawa:CADTH;2014Dec19.[cited2016Jun30].Availablefrom:https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/cdr/complete/cdr_complete_SE0384_Inflectra_Dec-23-14.pdf

CDRSUBSEQUENTENTRYBIOLOGICREVIEWREPORTFORINFLECTRA

77CommonDrugReview November2017

30. SohrabpourAA,MalekzadehR,KeshavarzianA.Currenttherapeuticapproachesininflammatoryboweldisease.CurrPharmDes.2010;16(33):3668-83.

31. DevlinSM,BresslerB,BernsteinCN,FedorakRN,BittonA,SinghH,etal.OverviewofsubsequententrybiologicsforthemanagementofinflammatoryboweldiseaseandCanadianAssociationofGastroenterologypositionstatementonsubsequententrybiologics.CanJGastroenterol[Internet].2013Oct[cited2016Jun13];27(10):567-71.Availablefrom:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3805336

32. JonesJ,PanaccioneR,RussellML,HilsdenR.MedicalmanagementofinflammatoryboweldiseaseamongCanadiangastroenterologists.CanJGastroenterol.2011Oct;25(10):565-9.Availablefrom:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3206553