Post on 05-Apr-2018
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
1/24
Still Young, Restless, and Jobless:
The Growing Employment Malaise Among
U.S. Teens and Young Adults
Prepared by:
Andrew SumIshwar Khatiwada
With
Sheila Palma
Susan Perron
Center for Labor Market Studies
Northeastern University
Boston, Massachusetts
Prepared for:Jobs for Americas Graduates
Alexandria, Virginia
January 2004
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
2/24
1
Table of Contents
Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 2
The Deteriorating Employment Situation Among theNations Teens and 20-24 Year Olds
Between 2000 and 2003 ............................................................................................................. 4Trends in the E/P Ratios of Key Demographic Subgroups of Teens.............................................. 7
Trends in the Employment Rates of Out-of-School, 16-24 Year Old Youth.................................. 9
Changes in the Part-time and Full-time Employment Status of Out-of-School Young Adults .... 10
The Deteriorating Employment Situation of the Nations Youngest High School Graduates...... 12
Comparisons of the Recent Employment Experiences of Teens
With Those During the 1990-91 Recession and Economic Recovery ..................................... 15
Job Deficits Among Teens and Young Adults 20-24 Years Old.................................................. 17
Changes in the Out-of-School and Out-of-Work Young Adult Population.................................. 18Why We Should Care About Higher Levels of Youth Joblessness.............................................. 19
What Can Be Done?...................................................................................................................... 21
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
3/24
2
Introduction
In early 2001, the economic boom of the 1990s which was accompanied by ten
consecutive years of economic growth and high levels of job creation came to an immediate halt,
and the recession of 2001 set in. While the National Bureau of Economic Research has recently
announced that the recession ended in November 2001, labor markets have failed to generate the
same level of strength as exhibited by the growth of the nations real output over the past year.
Unemployment continued to rise through 2002, and payroll jobs failed to increase. The onset of
the recession of 2001 and the so-called jobless recovery of 2002 took a severe toll on job
opportunities for the nations teens and young adults (20-24), especially those lacking a four year
college degree.1 Rising unemployment among teens and young adults was accompanied by
declines in their labor force participation, growing underemployment, and rising mal-
employment among college graduates. Underemployment problems are measured by workers
who can only obtain part-time jobs even though they wish to be employed full-time, and mal-
employment occurs when workers cannot obtain jobs in occupations that will fully utilize their
education and skills; e.g., college graduates working as waiters/waitresses, sales clerks, call
center operators, construction laborers.
During the second and third quarters of 2003, economic growth in the U.S. accelerated,
with real Gross Domestic Product rising by more than 8% in the third quarter. Payroll
employment began to rise steadily from August through November, and the estimated number of
employed persons 16 and older in the CPS household survey rose even more strongly. The
overall unemployment rate began to drift downward, falling below 6% in the fall of 2003 and to
5.7% in December.2 How have these recent output and employment developments influenced
1 For an earlier review of the impacts of the 2001 recession and the jobless recovery of 2002 on the employment
opportunities for teen and young adult population,See: (i) Andrew Sum, Nathan Pond, and Sheila Palma, The Impacts of the 2001 National Recession and the Ensuing
Jobless Recovery on the Employment of the Nations Teens and Young Adults, Prepared for the National League of
Cities, Washington, D.C., August 2002; (ii) Andrew Sum,Leaving Young Workers Behind, National League of
Cities, Institute for Youth, Education, and Families, Washington, D.C., 2003.
For other articles on the declining economic fortunes of the nations young adults,
See: (i) Peter Cox, Michelle Conlin, and Emily Thornton, A Lost Generation?,Business Week, November 4,
2002, pp. 44-46; (ii) Noshua Watson, Generation X: Generation Wrecked,Fortune, October 14, 2002, web site.2 The decline in the unemployment rate to 5.7% in December 2003 was due entirely to a drop in the number of
persons in the labor force rather than to a rise in employment.
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
4/24
3
job opportunities for the nations teens and young adults? This research report will provide a
detailed answer to this key labor market question. Unfortunately, the findings are
overwhelmingly disappointing. The employment rates of the nations teens 16-19 years old and
20-24 year old adults continued to plummet during calendar year 2003, with several of these
employment rates falling to new historical lows.3
The empirical findings will begin with an overview of employment and population
developments among the nations 16-24 year olds over the 2000-2003 period, with separate
breakouts of the data for teens and 20-24 year olds. Changes in the annual
employment/population ratios of teens and young adults over the 2000-2003 period will be
presented and compared to those of the nations adults in older age groups. The employment
experiences of teens in an array of gender and race-ethnic groups will be examined as will those
of out-of-school 16-24 year olds in various educational attainment subgroups. The changes in
the employment rates of teens during the recession of 2001 and the first two years of recovery
from the recession will be compared to those that took place in the 1990-91 recession and the
early years of recovery from that recession.
The employment analyses will be followed by an examination of changes in the numbers
and demographic characteristics of 16-24 year olds who were both out-of-school and out-of-work
in 2000 and 2003, a group sometimes referred to as disconnected youth.4 The final section will
be devoted to a discussion of why the nation ought to care about these growing youth labor
market problems and provide a brief description of national economic policy actions that the U.S.
Congress and the Bush administration should consider undertaking in cooperation with the states
and local governments to address the growing problems of youth idleness and joblessness.
See: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, The Employment Situation: December 2003, Washington, D.C., January
2004.3 The term employment rate in this study is used to refer to the employment/population ratio, i.e., the ratio of the
number of employed youth in a given age group to the civilian non-institutional population of youth in that same age
group.4 See: (i) Douglas J. Besharov,Americans Disconnected Youth: Toward A Preventive Strategy, CWAL Press and
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C., 2000; (ii) Andrew Sum, Ishwar
Khatiwada, et.al.,Left Behind in the Labor Market: Labor Market Problems of the Nations Out-of-School, Young
Adult Population, Alternative Schools Network, Chicago, January 2003.
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
5/24
4
The Deteriorating Employment Situation Among the
Nations Teens and 20-24 Year Olds Between 2000 and 2003
The onset of the national economic recession of 2001 and the lack of any job growth in
2002 substantially reduced employment opportunities for the nations teens and young adults
(20-24). These young workers bore the brunt of the employment losses experienced across the
country between 2000 and 2002.5 Recently-released national CPS employment data for 2003
reveal that the employment rates of teens and young adults continued to decline in 2003, pushing
the teen employment rate (E/P ratio) down to a new post-WW II low during the past year. In the
following three tables, we summarize three sets of inter-related developments for the 16-19 and
20-24 year old population over the 2000-2003 period: changes in their annual average aggregate
employment levels, their population size, and their employment/population ratios (E/P).
The key findings of this analysis can be summarized as follows. Over the past three
years, the annual average number of employed 16-24 year olds declined by nearly 1.1 million or
5.2%, far exceeding the rate of employment declines for all other age groups. The teen
population was responsible for all of the net decline in employment among the 16-24 age group
with their numbers dropping by 1.272 million or 18%. There was a modest gain in the number of
20-24 year olds over this time period.
Table 1:
Comparisons of Employment Levels of 16-19 and
20-24 Year Olds in the U.S., 2000 and 2003
(in millions)
Age Group
(A)
Employed 2000
(B)
Employed 2003
(C )
Change
2000-2003
(D)
% Change
2000-2003
16-19 7.194 5.922 -1.272 -17.7%
20-24 13.228 13.434 0.206 +1.5%
16-24 20.422 19.356 -1.066 -5.2%
Over the same three year period, the 16-24 year old population increased by nearly 5%
with the number of 20-24 year olds rising by 8% due in large part to a substantial influx of new
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
6/24
5
immigrant workers, who often displaced native born workers in the same age group from jobs
that they would likely have obtained.
Table 2:
Changes in the Population of 16-19 and 20-24 Year Olds in the U.S., 2000 to 2003
(in millions)
Age Group
(A)
Population 2000
(B)
Population 2003
(C)
Change
2000-2003
(D)
% Change
2000-2003
16-19 15.912 16.096 +0.184 +1.1%
20-24 18.311 19.801 +1.490 +8.1%
16-24 34.223 35.897 +1.674 +4.9%
As a consequence of declining employment and a rising population, the employment/
population ratios of teens and 20-24 year olds declined sharply over the 2000-2003 period. The
teen E/P rate fell by 8.4 percentage points to 36.8% in 2003, the lowest E/P ratio for the nations
teens since the end of World War II.6 (Chart 1). The E/P ratio of 20-24 year olds fell by 4.4
percentage points over the same three year period. The E/P ratios of most other age groups of
adults fell by much smaller amounts over this period, and persons 55 and older actually
experienced increases in their employment rates over this three year period. (Chart 2). The
younger the age group, the greater the decline in their E/P ratio. Idleness problems have
accelerated among the nations teens and young adults over the past three years, with no sign of
recovery during calendar year 2003.
5 See: Andrew Sum, Nathan Pond, with Sheila Palma, The Impacts of the 2001 National Recession and the Ensuing
Jobless Recovery6 As will be noted below, annual average data on teen employment rates are available from the CPS survey from
1948 onward.
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
7/24
6
Table 3:
Comparisons of the Employment/Population Ratios of 16-19 and
20-24 Year Olds in the U.S., 2000 and 2003 (in %)
Age Group
(A)
2000
(B)
2003
(C)
Change
2000-2003
16-19 45.2 36.8 -8.4
20-24 72.2 67.8 -4.4
Chart 1:
Trends in the Employment-Population Ratios of Teens and 20-24
Year Olds in the U.S., 2000 to 2003
(Annual Averages in Percent)
45.242.3
39.636.8
72.270.7
69.0 67.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2000 2001 2002 2003 2000 2001 2002 2003
Teens 20-24 Year Olds
Percent
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
8/24
7
Chart 2:
Changes in Employment to Population Ratios in the U.S. by Age Group, 2000 and 2003
-2.1
-8.4
-4.4-4.0
-3.3
-2.5
-1.7
2.1
1.0
-10.0
-8.0
-6.0
-4.0
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
All 16+ 16 -19
Years
20 - 24
Years
25 - 29
Years
30 - 34
Years
35 - 44
Years
45 - 54
Years
55 - 64
Years
65 +
Change(%)
Trends in the E/P Ratios of Key Demographic Subgroups of Teens
The nations teenagers clearly experienced the most substantial declines in their
employment rates over the past three years. How widespread were the job losses among the
nations teens across demographic subgroups over the 2000-2003 period? To answer this
question, we analyzed changes in the E/P ratios of gender and race-ethnic subgroups of the
teenaged population of the nation between 2000 and 2003. Findings reveal that these E/P ratios
declined considerably across both gender groups and all four race-ethnic subgroups (Table 4 and
Chart 3). Male teens, however, were more adversely affected than women. The E/P ratio of
male teens fell by nearly 10 percentage points while that for women declined by seven percentage
points. Male teens have been affected more considerably than women by the surge in new
immigrant workers in recent years, two-thirds of whom are males and half of whom are under the
age of 30.7 The E/P ratios of Black, Hispanic, and White teens fell by 8 to 9 percentage points
over the past three years. (See Table 4 and Chart 3).
7 See: Andrew Sum, Ishwar Khatiwada, Paul Harrington, with Sheila Palma,New Immigrants in the Labor Force
and the Number of Employed New Immigrants in the U.S. from 2000 through 2003 , Center for Labor Market
Studies, Northeastern University, Boston, December 2003.
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
9/24
8
Table 4:
Trends in the Employment/Population Ratios of Teenagers in the
U.S., by Gender and Race-Ethnic Group, 2000 to 2003
(Annual Averages in %)
Group
(A)
2000
(B)
2003
(C)
Percentage Point
Change
2000-2003
All 45.2 36.8 -8.4
Men 45.4 35.7 -9.7
Women 45.0 37.9 -7.1
Asian 30.8 24.4 -6.4
Black 29.8 21.7 -8.1
Hispanic 38.6 30.2 -8.4White 49.1 40.4 -8.7
Chart 3:
Percentage Point Change in the Employment/Population Ratios of
Teenagers between 2000 and 2003, by Gender and Race-Ethnic Group
-8.4
-9.7
-7.1
-6.4
-8.1-8.4
-8.7
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
All Men Women Asian Black Hispanic White
To place these declining E/P ratios of teens into historical perspective, we analyzed the
historical CPS data on employment rates of teens back to 1948, the beginning year of the data
series. For Black teens, employment data are only available back to 1973 and for Hispanics only
back to 1994. The estimated 36.8% employment rate for the nations teens was the lowest ever
recorded since 1948. The same holds true for the 35.7% employment rate among male teens. At
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
10/24
9
no time in the past 55 years have so few male teens worked as a percent of their population.
Among women, the 38% employment rate in 2003 was the lowest since 1971. For White teens,
the E/P rate was the lowest since 1964; and for Black youth the 22% employment rate was the
lowest since 1983 and the third lowest over the 30 year period for which such data are available.
Yet, with few exceptions, the national media and political leaders of both parties have been
largely silent on these issues.
Table 5:
Comparisons of the 2003 Employment/Population Ratios of Teens
(16-19) with those over the previous 57 Years
(A) (B)
Group 2003 E/P Ratio
Previous Year that the
E/P Ratio was Lower
All 16-19 36.8 None; Lowest in Post-WWII Period
Males 16-19 35.7 None; Lowest in Post-WWII Period
Females 16-19 37.8 Lowest since 1971
Whites 16-19 40.4 Lowest since 1964
Blacks 16-19 21.7 Lowest since 1983 (3rd lowest in 30
years for which data are available)
Trends in the Employment Rates of Out-of-School, 16-24 Year Old Youth
While in-school youth have faced sharp drops in the demand for their labor in recent
years, some labor market observers would place greater emphasis on the labor market plight of
the nations out-of-school youth. How have out-of-school teens and young adults fared in the
labor market over the past three years? To answer this question, we estimated E/P ratios for all
out-of-school 16-24 year olds by educational attainment during 2000 and 2003. Findings are
displayed in Table 6. During calendar year 2000, the E/P ratio for these out-of-school youth was
73.2%, but it fell to 68.5% in 2003, a decline of nearly five percentage points. Declines in E/P
ratios were in the 4.5 to 6.0 percentage point range for all educational subgroups, except four
year college graduates. The E/P ratio of bachelor degree recipients (and a few with advanced
degrees) fell by only 2.1 percentage points over this three year period. Young college graduates
enjoyed substantial advantages over their less educated counterparts. In 2003, 86 of every 100
young college graduates were employed versus only 70 of every 100 high school graduates and
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
11/24
10
50 out of 100 high school dropouts. Idleness rates and underemployment problems were very
high among out-of-school youth with no post-secondary education in 2003.8
Table 6:
Trends in the Employment/Population Ratios of Out-of-School 16-24 Year Olds by
Educational Attainment Between 2000 and 2003, U.S.(in %)
Educational Attainment
(A)
2000
(B)
2003
(C)
Percentage Point
Change, 2000 2003
All 73.2 68.5 -4.7
0-12 years, no diploma or GED 55.7 50.7 -5.0
H.S. diploma/GED 75.9 69.8 -6.1
1-3 years college, no degree 83.9 79.5 -4.5Associates degree 89.2 84.6 -4.6
Bachelors degree 88.3 86.2 -2.1
Changes in the Part-time and Full-time Employment Status of Out-of-School Young Adults
The ability of young adults to secure full-time employment when they do seek work has a
number of important economic advantages for them. Those youth who are employed full-time
work substantially more hours per week than their part-time peers, and they earn more per hour,
yielding very large weekly earnings advantages (more than twice as high as those of part-time
workers).9
Full-time employed youth are more likely to receive informal and formal training
from their employers and to be eligible for tuition assistance for college courses. They are also
more likely to be eligible for vacation pay, health insurance coverage, and pension coverage. The
economic returns from full-time work experience in the form of higher future wages are
considerably higher than those from part-time work.
Given the multiple economic advantages of full-time work, how well did the nations out-
of-school employed young adults fare in obtaining full-time jobs when they did secure
employment in 2000 and 2003? Overall, 19 percent of employed out-of-school young adults
8 A high fraction (nearly 1 of 4) of employed out-of-school youth with no post-secondary education were only
working part-time during calendar year 2003 even though many of them preferred full-time work.9 For a more detailed review of the economic advantages of full-time employment for young adults,
See: Andrew Sum, Neeta Fogg, and Garth Mangum, Confronting the Youth Demographic Challenge.
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
12/24
11
were working part-time in 2000; however, by 2003, the share of employed young adults in part-
time positions had risen to nearly 22 percent, an increase of three percentage points (Table 7).
Employed out-of-school youth in each educational subgroup were more likely to be working
part-time in 2003 than they were in 2000. Nevertheless, the ability of these youth to obtain full-
time jobs when they did work was strongly associated with their educational attainment. Only 11
percent of employed four year college graduates worked part-time in 2003 versus 21% of high
school graduates and 31% of high school dropouts.
Table 7:
Per Cent of Employed Out-of-School 16-24 Year Old Youth Working
Part-time in 2000 and 2003 by Educational Attainment, U.S.
Educational Group
(A)
2000
(B)
2003
(C)
Absolute
Change
All 18.9 21.9 +3.0
Lacks high school diploma/GED 29.7 31.2 +1.5
High school graduate, no college 17.4 20.7 +3.3
1-3 years of college 17.7 21.8 +4.1
Bachelors degree 6.9 10.7 +3.8
By combining the findings on the estimated employment rates of out-of-school 16-24
year olds with the shares of youth working full-time, we can generate estimates of full-time
employment/population ratios for each educational subgroup of out-of-school youth. The full-
time employment/population ratio of all out-of-school youth declined considerably between 2000
and 2003, a drop of 6 percentage points or 10%, more than three times as high as that for the
nations adults 25 and older. Young adults in each educational subgroup experienced substantial
declines in their full-time employment rates, with the absolute size of these reductions, ranging
from 4 to 7.5 percentage points. In 2003, only 35% of young high school dropouts and 55% of
high school graduates were employed on a full-time basis versus 77% of four year college
graduates (Table 8).
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
13/24
12
Table 8:
Trends in the Full-time Employment/Population Ratios of 16-24 Year
Old Youth by Educational Attainment, 2000 to 2003, U.S.
(in %)
Educational Group
(A)
2000
(B)
2003
(C)
Absolute
Change
(D)
Per Cent
Change
All 59.4 53.5 -5.9 -10%
Lacks high school diploma/GED 39.1 34.9 -4.2 -11%
High school graduate, no college 62.7 55.3 -7.4 -12%
1-3 years of college 69.0 62.1 -6.9 -10%
Bachelors degree 82.3 77.0 -5.3 -6%
The Deteriorating Employment Situation of the Nations Youngest High School Graduates
Many of the nations young adults who complete their formal schooling after graduating
from high school, especially men, have faced considerable difficulties in obtaining access to
well-paid, full-time jobs over the past few decades. The employment rates of the nations young
high school graduates (under 25) declined by six percentage points over the past three years.
These declines in employment rates were quite steep among both male and female high school
graduates, and graduates in each of the three major race-ethnic groups saw their employment
rates drop by 5.5 to 6.5 percentage points between 2000 and 2003. On a typical month, only 56
of every 100 Black high school graduates had any type of job in 2003.
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
14/24
13
Table 9:
Trends in the Employment/Population Ratios of Out-of-School
16-24 Year Old High School Graduates by Gender and Race-Ethnic Origin, 2000-2003
Gender/Race-Ethnic Group
(A)
2000
(B)
2003
(C)
Absolute
Change
(D)
Percent
Change
All 75.9 69.8 -6.1 -8.0%
Men 81.3 74.9 -6.4 -7.8%
Women 69.9 63.8 -6.1 -8.7%
Black 62.7 56.2 -6.5 -10.3%
Hispanic 75.2 69.7 -5.5 -7.3%
White 79.1 73.5 -5.6 -7.0%
The nations youngest high school graduates (those under 20) have fared even more
poorly in the labor market over the past three years. In calendar year 2000, at the peak of the
labor market boom, 71% of all non-enrolled high school graduates under age 20 were employed.
By 2003, the employment rate of these young high school graduates had declined to slightly
under 62% (Table 10). Each gender and race-ethnic group of young high school graduates
experienced very steep declines in their employment rates over this three year period. In 2003,
only 43% of young Black high school graduates were able to obtain some type of employment
versus 66% of White graduates.
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
15/24
14
Table 10:
Trends in the E/P Ratios of Non-Enrolled 16-19 Year Old,
High School Graduates, by Gender and Race-Ethnic Origin, 2000-2003
Gender/Race-Ethnic Group
(A)
2000
(B)
2003
(C)
Absolute
Change
(D)
Percent
Change
All 71.4 61.8 -9.6 -13.5%
Men 74.9 63.9 -11.0 -14.6%
Women 67.7 59.5 -8.2 -12.1%
White 75.5 66.5 -9.0 -12.0%
Black 53.2 43.3 -9.9 -18.7%
Hispanic 69.3 57.5 -11.8 17.0%
These young high school graduates had an even more difficult time in finding full-time
jobs in the first year or two following high school graduation. In 2000, only 50% of these
teenaged high school graduates were able to secure a full-time job (Table 11). Three years later,
the share of these young graduates with full-time jobs had fallen to 39%, a relative decline of
23%, with very sharp reductions taking place among each gender and race-ethnic group. Only
one of four young Black high school graduates were working full-time. Clearly, the nations
newest high school graduates have been facing several obstacles in transitioning to the labor
market and in securing full-time employment in the nations career labor markets. This situation
represents a substantial waste in available human resources, and the continued underutilization of
these young adults by reducing their cumulative work experience will lower their future earnings
as well.
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
16/24
15
Table 11:
Full-Time E/P Ratios for the 16-19 Year Old High School Graduates
Not Enrolled in College, 2000-2003
Gender/Race-Ethnic Group
(A)
2000
(B)
2003
(C)
Absolute
Change
(D)
Percent
Change
All 50.6 38.9 -11.7 -23.1%
Men 57.9 45.2 -12.7 -22.0%
Women 42.9 32.2 -10.6 -24.8%
White 53.8 42.6 -11.2 -20.9%
Black 35.7 24.5 -11.2 -31.4%
Hispanic 51.8 38.6 -13.2 -25.5%
Comparisons of the Recent Employment Experiences of Teens
With Those During the 1990-91 Recession and Economic Recovery
The steep decline in the employment/population ratio of the nations teens from 2000 to
2003 differs in a number of important respects from its behavior during the recession of 1990-91
and the first two years of recovery from that recession. The employment rate of the nations
teens is quite cyclically sensitive, declining at above average rates during recessionary periods
and rising at above average rates during periods of strong job growth and declining
unemployment. For example, the teen employment rate rose strongly during the economic boom
years of the mid to late 1980s increasing from 41.5% in 1983 to 47.5% in 1989, the peak
economic year before the recession of 1990-91 set in. From 1989 to 1991, the E/P rate of teens
fell by 5.5 percentage points and would decline by another full percentage point in 1992. In
1993, however, the E/P rate of teens began to rise. Two years after the 1990-91 recession ended,
the E/P rate of teens was back to where it was at the end of the recession.
From 1992 to 2000, the E/P ratio of the nations teens rose from 41.7% to 45.2%, but
never achieved its 1989 cyclical peak value of 47.5%. The recession of 2001 lasted from March
to November, an eight month duration identical to that of the 1990-91 recession. The nations
unemployment rate at the trough of the recession in March 1991, however, was 6.8% versus an
unemployment rate of only 5.6% in November 2001, the trough of the 2001 recession. The E/P
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
17/24
16
rate of teens fell by 5.8 percentage points between 2000 and 2002, but rather than rising as
expected in 2003 it continued to decline by nearly another three percentage points. While payroll
job growth in the U.S. has been quite weak in the past two years, the number of persons reporting
themselves as employed in the CPS household survey was 2.3 million higher in November 2003
than in November 2001, a stronger level of employment growth than took place during the
recovery from the 1991 recession.10 There are clearly important structural forces at work in U.S.
labor markets that are holding down the employment levels of teens, including low rates of
growth in formal payroll employment, especially in retail trade, a key sector for youth
employment, and high levels of competition from new foreign immigrants, whose employment
ranks increased by 2.5 million from 2000 to 2003. There is clear evidence of displacement of
native born, young adults by these new immigrants, a majority of whom are young, male, and
poorly educated.
Chart 4:
Trends in the Employment/Population Ratios of the
Nations Teens, Selected Years, 1989 to 2003
(in %)
47.5
42.0
41.041.7
45.2
42.3
39.6
36.8
35
40
45
50
55
1989 1991 1992 1993 2000 2001 2002 2003
Percent
10 See: Andrew Sum, Paul Harrington, and Ishwar Khatiwada, Employment Developments in the U.S. Since the End
of the Recession of 2001: Conflicting Tales from Two National Surveys, Center for Labor Market Studies,
Northeastern University, November 2003.
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
18/24
17
Job Deficits Among Teens and Young Adults 20-24 Years Old
The extraordinarily steep declines in the employment/population ratios of the nations
teens and young adults over the past three years have left a large number of youth jobless in the
past year. To estimate the size of the job deficits faced by youth in these two age groups in 2003,we calculated the number of additional jobs that would have been needed by teens and 20-24
year olds in the past year to maintain their employment rates at their 2000 levels. The number of
additional jobs needed by the nations teenagers in 2003 would have been 1.352 million while
20-24 year old youth would have required another .872 million jobs to achieve this employment
target (Table 12 and Chart 5). The combined number of additional jobs needed by teens and
young adults to eliminate their job deficits would have been 2.224 million, an increase of
between 11 and 12 percent over their actual 2003 employment levels. Elimination of these job
deficits will require extraordinary job creation efforts. It took six years of steady and strong
national job growth from 1992 to 1998 to boost teen employment by 1.37 million jobs. In the
absence of a new, comprehensive youth employment initiative, including incentives for firms to
hire young workers and public job creation programs, teen idleness will remain at very high
levels over the next few years, especially among high school dropouts, high school graduates
with no college, low income youth, and Black teens.
Table 12:
Comparisons of the Actual 2003 Employment Levels of 16-19 and 20-24Year Olds with those that Would Have Prevailed if their E/P Ratios in 2000
Had Been in Place in 2003
(in Millions)
Age Group
(A)
Actual 2003
Employment
(B)
Hypothetical
2003 Employment
(C)
Hypothetical
Minus Actual
16 19 5.922 7.274 1.352
20 24 13.434 14.306 0.87216 24 19.356 21.580 2.224
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
19/24
18
Chart 5:
Additional Number of Employed Youth if
Year 2000 E/P Ratios had Prevailed
(in Millions)
1.352
0.872
2.224
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
16 - 19 20 - 24 16 - 24
Employment(inmillions)
Changes in the Out-of-School and Out-of-Work Young Adult Population
Joblessness among the nations youth is often viewed as a much more serious economic
and social problem when it is combined with the absence of any schooling/training activity. The
national CPS data for 2000 and 2003 have been used by BLS to produce estimates of the labor
force status of 16-24 year old youth by their school enrollment status at the time of the surveys.
We have analyzed these data to produce estimates of the number of 16-24 year old youth who
were both out-of-school and out-of-work in 2000 and 2003 (Table 13). Over this three year
period, the annual average number of out-of-school, out-of-work youth increased from 4.881
million to 5.668 million, an increase of 787,000 or 16%. Young males accounted for the bulk of
this increase, with their numbers rising by 525,000 or 26 percent, due to their steeper job losses
over this three year period and their lower school enrollment rates. The pool of women who
were out-of-school and out-of-work rose by only 8%, but many women enrolled in school were
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
20/24
19
left jobless. Both Whites and Hispanics experienced double digit growth in the number of teens
and young adults in their out-of-school, out-of-work ranks.
Table 13:
Trends in the Number of Out-of-School, Out-of-Work 16-24 Year Olds in
the U.S., by Gender and Race-Ethnic Origin, 2000 to 2003
Group
(A)
2000
(B)
2003
(C)
Absolute
Change
(D)
Percent
Change
All 16-24 4,881 5,668 787 16%
Men 1,992 2,517 525 26% Women 2,890 3,151 261 9% Black 1,113 1,206 93 8% Hispanic 1,008 1,233 225 22% White 3,509 4,014 505 14%
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Unpublished tabulations from the CPS surveys, 2000
and 2003.
Why We Should Care About Higher Levels of Youth Joblessness
The high and rising levels of youth joblessness across the country and the growing
numbers of disconnected youth have received some media attention over the past few years, but
economic policymakers at the national and state level have provided few, and in most cases no,
effective responses to the problem.11 There even has been a tendency among some analysts and
reporters to casually dismiss the problem of declining labor force participation and rising
joblessness among teens, claiming that they can go apply themselves to their academic studies or
work on their tans during the summer months.12
These shortsighted and largely ignorant views
of the problem need to be challenged by youth advocates, labor market analysts, and youth
themselves, and the nations and states economic policymakers need to provide considerably
more political leadership and support for youth employment, education, and training programs to
substantially boost employment among the nations teens and young adults in the near future.
11 See: (i) Marla Dickerson, Latino Job Seekers Find Born in USA Not Enough,Los Angeles Times, April 2,
2002, (ii) Bob Herbert, Young, Jobless, Hopeless,New York Times, February 6, 2003, pp. A-35.12 (i) State of the Union: Americas Fortune, The Atlantic Monthly, January/February 2004, pp. ; (ii) Stephanie
Armour, Record Number of Teens Just Say No to Summer Jobs, USA Today, 6-24-2002, www.USATODAY.com.
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
21/24
20
There are a wide array of private and social economic and educational benefits that can be
generated by a substantive expansion of employment opportunities for the nations teens and
young adults.13
First, the high rates of labor underutilization among 16-24 year olds, including
unemployment, underemployment, and discouragement, reduces the volume of labor inputs into
the production process and the level of real output of the U.S. economy. These output losses
from failing to utilize the available youth labor supply today are lost forever. Second, work
experience is a valuable form of human capital that can increase the future employability and real
wages of youth. Rising joblessness reduces the amount of work experience that youth will
acquire today and their future earnings tomorrow. Third, the earnings obtained by young workers
from their employment would be used to generate additional consumption expenditures on goods
and services, thereby raising aggregate demand throughout the economy and the level of
employment of other adult workers.
Fourth, a number of studies of the in high school work experiences of teens have found
that youth with some in-school employment experience, especially Black, Hispanic, and
economically disadvantaged youths, are less likely to dropout of high school than their peers who
do not work during their high school years. Employment expansion can help boost efforts to
keep these youth in-school through graduation. Rising employment by itself can encourage some
other teens to drop out of school, but strong efforts to tie jobs for youth to their continuedenrollment in high school can achieve the desired results. Fifth, work-based learning
opportunities can increase the perceived relevance of school-based learning among high school
and college students and strengthen their incentives to acquire some post-secondary education.
Followup studies of Boston high school graduates has revealed that participation in school-to-
career programs in high school with related work experience has been associated with a
significantly higher likelihood of college enrollment upon graduation from high school.
Sixth, students who work steadily in high school, especially those who do not go on to
enroll in four year colleges and universities, obtain a smoother transition into the labor market in
13 For a review of the educational and economic advantages of in-school work experience,
See: Andrew Sum, Neeta Fogg, and Garth Mangum, Confronting the Youth Demographic Challenge: The Labor
Market Prospects of Out-of-School Youth, Sar Levitan Center for Social Policy Studies, Johns Hopkins University,
Baltimore, 2000.
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
22/24
21
the first few years after graduation from high school, avoiding problems of long-term idleness.
Seventh, those states and metropolitan areas with higher rates of employment for teens are
characterized by significantly higher rates of employment for its 20-24 year old residents five
years later. Eighth, youth who work more during the high school years, especially those who
learn new skills on their jobs, obtain significantly higher hourly earnings on their jobs in the first
few years following graduation. Findings of longitudinal research also indicate that they will
secure significantly higher annual earnings eight to ten years after graduation than their peers
who did not work during high school.
Ninth, a rise in the teen employment/population ratio tends to be associated with
significantly lower rates of teen pregnancies.14
Tenth, teenaged mothers who work more during
the first five to ten years following the birth of their first child obtain higher wages and real
annual earnings in their young adult years and are significantly less likely to be poor.15
Eleventh,
national research on the criminal behavior of young men suggests that reduced real earnings of
young men tend to be associated with higher rates of criminal activity, including those involved
with the illegal drug trade.16 High rates of idleness among young men reduces their work
experience and their future earnings potential, thus making criminal activity more attractive.
What Can Be Done?
There is no simple silver bullet solution to the problems of the high levels of joblessness
and underemployment among the nations teens and young adults. The causes of these problems
are multiple in nature and new important structural forces seem to be at work.17
There are,
14 For evidence on the risky behavior of youth and its consequences,
See: Jonathan Gruber, Risky Behavior Among Youth, MIT and NBER, Cambridge, May 2000.15 For evidence on this set of issues and on the other determinants of the future earnings and poverty status of teen
mothers,
See: Neeta Fogg,An Economic Analysis of the Determinants and the Long-Term Labor Market Consequences ofTeenage Childbearing in the United States, 1979-91, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Economics, Northeastern
University, Boston, 1997.16 See: Richard B. Freeman, Why Do So Many Young American Men Commit Crimes and What Can We Do
About It?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Winter 1996, No. 1, pp. 25-42; (ii) Jeff Grogger, Criminal
Opportunities, Criminal Activities and Young Mens Labor Supply, Department of Economics, University of
California, Santa Barbara, 1997.17 A recent article on the joblessness problems of young Black men cites other structural factors at work, including
employability problems associated with criminal convictions and fathering children out-of-wedlock with
accompanying child support burdens.
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
23/24
22
however, a variety of macroeconomic policies, school-to-work transition strategies, and targetted
job creation policies that can play an important role in generating additional employment
opportunities for these young workers over the next few years. First, continued high rates of real
output growth will be needed to boost the overall demand for labor, particularly in formal payroll
employment, and increase employers willingness to hire additional numbers of young workers.
The 1980s and 1990s experience bears out the importance of strong output and employment
growth to boost teen employment opportunities. Between 1992 and 1998, employment levels
among the nations teens increased by nearly 1.4 million, and they captured 14.5% of all of the
gains in employment among the nations civilian working-age population over this six year
period. Second, Targeted New Jobs Tax Credits for employers hiring additional numbers of
teens and young adults could prove effective in boosting the demand for such workers in the
short run. Past experience with the New Jobs Tax Credit of 1977 showed it was quite effective
in boosting employment in teen-intensive industries.18 Employers need to be given incentives to
hire additional numbers of youth.
Third, there is a clear need to provide in-school youth with career counseling, job
development and job placement services during the high school years to connect them to jobs and
employers and to facilitate their transition to the labor market upon graduation. These labor
market connecting activities also need to be supplemented with intensive followup supportactivities to strengthen the ability of youth to obtain and retain employment during the first year
or two following high school graduation and to enable them to move seamlessly from one job to
another. Both the U.S. Congress and state legislatures should be supportive of such efforts, with
additional monies provided by state and local Workforce Investment Boards and county/city
governments.
Fourth, the U.S. Congress should provide monies to state and local Workforce Investment
Boards under the current Workforce Investment Act to create jobs for unemployed 16-24 year
See: Harry Holzer and Paul Offner, The Puzzle of Black Male Unemployment, The Public Interest, Winter 2004,
pp. 74-84.18Our proposal is based on a combination of the New Jobs Tax Credit and the Targeted Jobs Tax Credit Programs.
For evidence on their effectiveness,
See: Lawrence F. Katz, Wage Subsidies for the Disadvantaged, in Generating Jobs: How to Increase Demand
for Less-Skilled Workers, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1998, pp. 21-53
8/2/2019 Still Young Restless and Jobless Report
24/24
olds in nonprofit organizations and state and local governments. Past job creation programs for
teens and young adults have been able to boost employment for disadvantaged and other low
income neighborhood youth in a cost effective manner. Such monies should also be allowed to
be used to subsidize jobs for teens and young adults in private for profit firms as was done under
the Youth Incentive Entitlement Pilot7 Program in the late 1970s. Fourth, the Bush
administration and the U.S. Congress should immediately restore funding for a separate summer
jobs program for low income and other jobless youth, with the goal of putting no less than
500,000 youth to work in such jobs during the forthcoming summer. The last two summers have
seen steep declines in the employment rates of teens, with the summer of 2003 being
characterized by the lowest teen summer employment rate since the end of World War II. A
combination of strong aggregate job growth, tax incentives for employers to hire teens and young
adults, a comprehensive set of connecting activities to move youth into regular employment, and
subsidized job creation programs for teens and young adults will be needed to substantively boost
youth employment over the next few years. It is now time for national political leaders in both
parties, including all Presidential candidates, to place youth joblessness higher on their political
agendas.