Post on 20-Sep-2020
St Aidan's Church of England High School
Student survey report – January 2017
In case of enquiries please contact Kirkland Rowell Surveys by emailing info@kirkland-rowell.com.Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited.
Kirkland Rowell is part of GL Assessment, a division of the GL Education Group.
Report generated on 06/02/2017
Student survey report
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 2 of 97
Contents
Page
1. Executive summary An overview of findings for this survey with comparison to theprevious survey if applicable.
3
2. Key results Satisfaction levels for academic, non-academic and additionalcriteria.
10
3. Student priorities Importance ratings and priorities for improvement. 16
4. Unique questions Analysis of your unique questions. 21
5. Parent View : Student summary Your survey data linked to the 12 questions in Ofsted’s ParentView.
24
6. Ofsted self-evaluation summary Linking your survey data to the current Ofsted evaluation schedule. 26
7. Standard analysis Analysis of all remaining data which may include genderanalysis,healthy lifestyle, home environment, values andhomework.
56
8. Year group analysis Year group scores compared to national averages. 68
9. Time series analysis Trends for surveyed criteria over time. 77
10. Appendix Supplementary data and further information. 87
Student survey report – Executive summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 3 of 97
Executive summaryThis report details the findings of the fourth Kirkland Rowell Student Survey for St Aidan's Church of EnglandHigh School. The report measures the levels of satisfaction among the students for a range of criteria, whichhave been previously identified as being important to the parents of school students, as well as for the coresubjects, taught at the school. The report measures the relative importance of the criteria surveyed, as wellas providing results tables that identify the perceived strengths and weaknesses of the school in the year toJanuary 2017. The report also measures performance with regard to overall satisfaction and improvement.
Summary of results for this survey
• 540 completed questionnaires were returned representing a response rate of 80.4%. The response meantthat meaningful data could be drawn for all criteria except for Art Graphics, Maths GCSE Resit, MusicTechnology, Textiles and Travel and Tourism.
• The students gave an excellent overall performance score (80.3%) (see page 6).
• With regard to academic subjects, the highest proportion of students who said they were making goodprogress was for German, Geology and Music.
• The highest proportion of students who said they were not making good progress was for Art, EnglishGCSE Resit and Statistics.
• With regard to non-academic areas, students awarded the highest scores for the delivery of Schoolfacilities, Choice of subjects and Levels of homework.
• The students awarded the lowest scores for the delivery of Social health education, Developing moralvalues and Developing confidence.
• The students' top priorities for improvement are Happiness of child, Developing confidence and Teachingquality.
• The male students gave significantly higher scores for Happiness of child, Careers advice, Control ofbullying, Handling complaints, Regular marking of work and Encouraging local community activity.
• The female students gave significantly higher scores for Physics, School communication and Promotingracial harmony.
Summary of results since the previous survey
• The following academic area received significantly lower scores than the previous survey: Art.
• The following non-academic area received significantly higher scores than the previous survey: Truancycontrol.
• The following additional areas received significantly lower scores than the previous survey: School meals,Celebrating and rewarding achievement and Encouraging and listening to students' views.
Summary of results over more than two surveys
• The following academic area received significantly lower scores over more than two surveys: Psychology.
• The following non-academic areas received significantly lower scores over more than two surveys:Community spirit, Social health education, Control of bullying, Careers advice, Developing confidence andHappiness of child.
• The following additional area received significantly higher scores over more than two surveys: Libraryfacilities.
Student survey report – Executive summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 4 of 97
• The following additional areas received significantly lower scores over more than two surveys: Promotingracial harmony, Regular marking of work, School meals and Encouraging and listening to students' views.
• The survey has achieved a good benchmark of performance against which future academic years might becompared.
Student survey report – Executive summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 5 of 97
Strengths and weaknesses
The results below are the areas in which the school has the highest and lowest perceived standards ofperformance. Gold represents ‘outstanding’, green is ‘good’, black is ‘room for improvement’ and red ‘attentionadvised’. Criterion scores in blue are only reliable to within 10% and scores in pink should only be consideredindicative.
Relative strengths for academic criteria103.1% German
100.0% Geology
98.8% Music
96.8% Chemistry
96.7% Physics
Relative weaknesses for academic criteria59.8% Art
63.6% English GCSE Resit
68.4% Statistics
69.8% English Language and Literature
74.4% Business
Relative strengths for non-academic criteria Importance Ranking109.1% School facilities (61.2%) 7th
99.9% Choice of subjects (48.7%) 13th
91.4% Levels of homework (35.0%) 15th
89.2% Careers advice (67.8%) 3rd
88.3% School discipline (52.1%) 12th
Relative weaknesses for non-academic criteria Importance Ranking43.3% Social health education (27.4%) 16th
72.0% Developing moral values (44.9%) 14th
73.7% Developing confidence (62.1%) 6th
74.4% Developing potential (64.3%) 5th
74.5% Happiness of child (85.0%) 2nd
Student survey report – Executive summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 6 of 97
Response to survey
540 completed questionnaires were returned representing a response rate of 80.4%.
Proportion of responses (%) Number of responses
Responses from male students 41.4 218
Responses from female students 58.6 308
Responses from Year 12 students 55.4 298
Responses from Year 13 students 44.6 240
Overall student satisfaction
This survey (%)Previous
survey (%)Change (%)
Overall, rate the performance of the school 80.3 85.9 -5.6
Overall student satisfaction
0% 1%
9%
56%
34%
Very poor Poor Neither Good Very good0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Per
cent
age
• More students rate the overall performance of the school as ‘good’ or very good.
Student survey report – Executive summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 7 of 97
Overall performance scores broken down by gender and year group
Overall performance scores broken down by gender
This survey Last survey
80% 80% 81%
86% 87%85%
All students Male students Female students0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
• The students gave an excellent overall performance score of 80.3%, declined since the last survey.
• Male students scored the overall performance of the school broadly in line with female students.
Overall performance scores broken down by year group
All students Male students Female students
81% 80%79%81%82%
79%
Year 12 Year 130%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Per
cent
age
• Year 12 students scored the highest overall from other year groups and are therefore most satisfied with theschool’s performance.
• Year 13 male students and Year 12 female students scored the highest overall from other year groups andare therefore most satisfied with the school’s performance.
Student survey report – Executive summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 8 of 97
Time series analysis of overall performance scores
Graph showing the overall performance scores trend broken down over time.
89% 88%86%
80%
2011 2013 2015 20170%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
• There was no significant change over four surveys for the overall performance score.
Student survey report – Executive summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 9 of 97
Students recommend this school broken down by gender and year group
Recommend this school scores broken down by gender
This survey Last survey
95% 94% 95%
96%
95%
96%
All students Male students Female students0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
• 94.7% of students said they would recommend this school to another student.
• Male students would recommend this school to another student broadly in line with female students.
Recommend this school scores broken down by year group
All students Male students Female students
96%
93%95%
93%
97%
93%
Year 12 Year 130%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
• Year 12 students would recommend this school to another student more than other year groups.
• Year 12 male students and Year 12 female students would recommend this school to another student morethan other year groups.
Student survey report – Key results
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 10 of 97
Key resultsThe core analysis of your survey data; proportions making progress in academic subjects and satisfactionlevels in non-academic and additional criteria. Explanations have been provided to help you to interpret yourresults.
Interpreting results
For the sake of assessment in most schools, academic questions receiving a score of:
• Over 90% are 'outstanding' (above the gold line)
• 80% to 89.9% are 'good' (above the green line)
• 75% to 79.9% indicate 'room for improvement' (above the red line)
• Below 75% indicates 'attention advised' (below the red line)
Non-academic and additional questions receiving a score of:
• Over 80% are 'outstanding' (above the gold line)
• 70% to 79.9% are 'good' (above the green line)
• 65% to 69.9% indicate 'room for improvement' (above the red line)
• Below 65% indicates 'attention advised' (below the red line)
Weighted scoresIn the results tables the scores achieved are given as a percentage. A full explanation of how true/falseresponses were converted to percentages is given on our website. As there is a measurable bias in the waythat students score criteria, it is necessary to create “weighted” scores so that the score for any one criterionmight be compared meaningfully with the score for any other criterion on a ‘level playing field’. These weightedscores are calculated based upon the average scores achieved from over 280 similar, English schools. Resultsquoted from the previous survey, if applicable, may show small differences from those originally given, as theweightings applied change slightly from one year to the next.
Statistical reliabilityGenerally all of our results are quoted as being reliable to within less than 5% at the 95% confidence level.Where this is not possible due to the sample achieved, results are quoted as reliable to within less than 10%at the 95% confidence level and are highlighted in blue. Occasionally when results are even less reliablewe show an indicative result and highlight in pink. Where there are fewer than 10 responses we only show“low response” and no further result is quoted. For further information see our website for details. Criteriawhich have not yet been surveyed in at least 30 schools do not yet have an average figure, and therefore,these scores cannot be weighted against what students parents ‘usually’ say. These un-weighted scores aremarked *.
Student survey report – Key results
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 11 of 97
Understanding your results table
Academic criteria This survey (%) Previous survey (%) % Change
ICT 96.2 92.8 +3.4
French 92.6 90.9 +1.7
Religious Education 82.4 76.1 +6.3
Physical Education 82.3 79.6 +2.7
Music 82.1 78.3 +3.8
Food Technology 81.4 81.7 -0.3
History 80.8 75.0 +5.8
Mathematics 80.1 79.4 +0.7
Geography 79.9 74.9 +5.0
Business Studies 77.2
Design Technology 77.2 72.1 +5.1
Art 76.5 75.4 +1.1
Textiles 76.3
English 75.5 72.8 +2.7
Russian * 74.3
Science 72.1 84.8 -12.7
Drama 71.5 73.4 -1.9
Engineering 59.5
Psychology Low response
Your results are shown as a weightedscore. This is a calculation applied toyour raw results using the averagescores achieved from over 280similar, English schools. It allows eachcriterion to be compared meaningfullyon a ‘level playing field’. This scorecan be over 100%.
The previous survey results mayappear to differ slightly from youroriginal report last year. This isbecause the “weighting” calculationapplied changes slightly from oneyear to the next.
Scores above the goldline are ‘outstanding’.
Scores above the greenline are ‘good’.
Scores above the redline indicate 'room forimprovement'.
* This criteria has not yetbeen surveyed in at least 30schools. As such we do nothave an average figure andtherefore cannot weight thisscore against what studentsparents ‘usually’ say.
Scores below the redline indicate 'attentionadvised'.
“Low response” indicatesthat there were fewerthan 10 responses.
Subject scores in pinkshould only be consideredindicative due to a lowsample size, or highpolarisation.
Subject scores in blueare only reliable to within10% due to the sampleachieved.
Only highlighted changes shouldbe considered significant – agreen highlight shows a significantimprovement, a red highlight showsa significant decline, since the lastsurvey.
Student survey report – Key results
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 12 of 97
Academic criteria
The following table shows weighted proportion of students making progress for all academic subjects taughtwithin the school. Where data is available, these are compared to the same score from the previous year’ssurvey, and the percentage change shown. Only highlighted changes should be considered significant.
Academic criteria This survey (%) Previous survey (%) % Change
German 103.1
Geology * 100.0
Music 98.8 95.6 +3.2
Chemistry 96.8 94.6 +2.2
Physics 96.7 94.3 +2.4
Food Technology 95.2
Spanish 94.6 89.6 +5.0
Dance 94.3
Drama 94.2 99.9 -5.7
ICT 93.8 84.4 +9.4
Economics 93.7 95.5 -1.8
Health and Social Care 93.5 93.6 -0.1
History 91.6 91.1 +0.5
Art Photography 91.4 75.3 +16.1
Ancient History 91.1 91.1 +0.0
Government and Politics 91.1 88.9 +2.1
Geography 90.7 87.3 +3.4
Further Mathematics 90.6 88.2 +2.4
Performing Arts 89.9 99.9 -10.0
French 89.9 101.2 -11.3
Product Design 89.5
Sport (BTEC) 89.3
Business Applied 87.5 95.2 -7.7
Sociology 86.3 78.9 +7.4
English Literature 85.2 91.3 -6.1
Religious Studies 84.8 93.0 -8.2
Biology 83.6 89.3 -5.7
Mathematics 83.5 88.2 -4.7
Media Studies 83.5 84.7 -1.3
Computer Science 83.3 84.4 -1.1
Physical Education 80.5 82.4 -1.9
Science 79.3 94.5 -15.2
Psychology 78.3 85.0 -6.6
Student survey report – Key results
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 13 of 97
Academic criteria This survey (%) Previous survey (%) % Change
English Language 77.9 78.0 -0.2
Business 74.4 95.2 -20.8
English Language and Literature 69.8 78.0 -8.2
Statistics * 68.4
English GCSE Resit * 63.6 91.7 -28.0
Art 59.8 97.2 -37.4
Art Graphics Low response
Maths GCSE Resit * Low response
Music Technology Low response
Textiles Low response
Travel and Tourism Low response
• Student progress in the following academic subjects has been judged as ‘outstanding’: German, Geology,Music, Chemistry, Physics, Food Technology, Spanish, Dance, Drama, ICT, Economics, Health andSocial Care, History, Art Photography, Ancient History, Government and Politics, Geography and FurtherMathematics.
• Student progress in the following academic subjects has been judged as ‘good’: Performing Arts, French,Product Design, Sport (BTEC), Business Applied, Sociology, English Literature, Religious Studies, Biology,Mathematics, Media Studies, Computer Science and Physical Education.
• Student progress in the following academic subjects has been judged as 'room for improvement': Science,Psychology and English Language.
• Student progress in the following academic subjects has been judged as 'attention advised': Business ,English Language and Literature, Statistics, English GCSE Resit and Art.
• The proportion of students making progress in the following academic subjects has shown significantdecline since the previous survey: Art.
• The following academic subjects have not been surveyed in at least 30 schools so we do not yet havean average figure, and therefore, these scores cannot be weighted against what students usually say:Geology, Statistics, English GCSE Resit and Maths GCSE Resit.
• The following academic subject achieved a low sample; therefore scores are only reliable within 10%:Physics, Drama, Economics, Health and Social Care, Art Photography, Government and Politics,Geography, Further Mathematics, Business Applied, Sociology, English Literature, Biology, Mathematicsand Psychology.
• The following academic subject achieved a very low sample; therefore scores should only be consideredindicative: German, Geology, Music, Food Technology, Spanish, Dance, ICT, Ancient History, PerformingArts, French, Product Design, Sport (BTEC), Religious Studies, Media Studies, Computer Science, PhysicalEducation, Science, English Language, Business , English Language and Literature, Statistics, EnglishGCSE Resit, Art, Art Graphics, Maths GCSE Resit, Music Technology, Textiles and Travel and Tourism.
• Previous survey data cannot be provided for comparison for the following subjects: German, Geology, FoodTechnology, Dance, Product Design, Sport (BTEC) and Statistics.
Student survey report – Key results
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 14 of 97
Non-academic criteria
The following table shows the scores given by students for non-academic areas. Where data is available, theseare compared to the same score from the previous year’s survey, and the percentage change shown. Onlyhighlighted changes should be considered significant.
Non-academic criteria This survey (%) Previous survey (%) % Change
School facilities 109.1 109.2 -0.1
Choice of subjects 99.9 100.6 -0.7
Levels of homework 91.4 86.6 +4.7
Careers advice 89.2 95.8 -6.6
School discipline 88.3 87.4 +0.9
Community spirit 87.8 92.1 -4.3
Teaching quality 87.3 92.6 -5.3
Computer access 86.4 88.5 -2.0
Truancy control 82.9 56.5 +26.4
Control of bullying 81.0 86.5 -5.5
Availability of resources 80.4 86.0 -5.6
Caring teachers 80.0 82.4 -2.3
School security 79.8 79.8 0.0
School communication 78.0 80.4 -2.3
Exam results 76.5 78.6 -2.2
Happiness of child 74.5 76.0 -1.5
Developing potential 74.4 75.3 -0.9
Developing confidence 73.7 77.2 -3.5
Developing moral values 72.0 73.4 -1.4
Social health education 43.3 52.6 -9.3
• Student scores in the following non-academic criteria have been judged as ‘outstanding’: School facilities,Choice of subjects, Levels of homework, Careers advice, School discipline, Community spirit, Teachingquality, Computer access, Truancy control, Control of bullying, Availability of resources and Caringteachers.
• Student scores in the following non-academic criteria have been judged as ‘good’: School security, Schoolcommunication, Exam results, Happiness of child, Developing potential, Developing confidence andDeveloping moral values.
• Student scores in the following non-academic criteria have been judged as 'attention advised': Social healtheducation.
• The scores given by students in the following non-academic criteria have shown significant improvementsince the previous survey: Truancy control.
Student survey report – Key results
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 15 of 97
Additional criteria
Additional criteria were chosen by the school, and investigated with regard to student satisfaction. The followingresults were achieved with regard to those students who answered the question. The percentage scores aregiven in descending order. Only highlighted changes should be considered significant.
Additional criteria This survey (%) Previous survey (%) % Change
School meals 99.7 108.1 -8.4
Treating all students fairly and equally 93.0 91.6 +1.4
Library facilities 90.1 89.2 +0.9
Handling complaints 87.4 85.9 +1.5
Quality of school management 87.1 89.6 -2.5
Promoting racial harmony 85.1 89.0 -3.9
Access to staff 84.6 87.1 -2.5
Regular marking of work 84.1 85.3 -1.2
Transfer from previous school 82.0 81.5 +0.5
Out of school activities and clubs 78.8 79.5 -0.7
Attitude of non-teaching support staff 77.0 79.2 -2.2
Encouraging and listening to students'views
75.6 85.7 -10.0
Celebrating and rewarding achievement 75.6 80.3 -4.7
Tailoring workload to childs needs andability
75.2 76.0 -0.8
Encouraging local community activity 67.5 78.9 -11.4
• Student scores in the following additional criteria have been judged as ‘outstanding’: School meals, Treatingall students fairly and equally, Library facilities, Handling complaints, Quality of school management,Promoting racial harmony, Access to staff, Regular marking of work and Transfer from previous school.
• Student scores in the following additional criteria have been judged as ‘good’: Out of school activities andclubs, Attitude of non-teaching support staff, Encouraging and listening to students' views, Celebrating andrewarding achievement and Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability.
• Student scores in the following additional criteria have been judged as 'room for improvement': Encouraginglocal community activity.
• The scores given by students in the following additional criteria have shown significant decline since theprevious survey: School meals, Encouraging and listening to students' views and Celebrating and rewardingachievement.
Student survey report – Student priorities
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 16 of 97
Student prioritiesStudents were asked to choose the ten criteria which were most important to them from a list of twenty. Thissection shows the analysis of these importance ratings and of the priorities for improvement.
Student priorities importance
Ideally those criteria which are most important to students will be the criteria to which students award thehighest scores. In the following table, the second column shows the percentage of students who chose eachof the criteria as one of their ten choices of what they felt was most important to them. The third column showshow well the school performs for the criteria ie. 1st = what the school does best, 20th = what the school doesleast well. Only highlighted rankings should be considered as being worthy of note. A green highlight showsthat the school performs well within a criterion that is important to students, a red highlight shows that theschool performs less well within a criterion that is important to students. The final two columns show the sameinformation for the previous survey, for comparison.
CriteriaImportancescore (%)
Satisfactionranking
Previousimportancescore (%)
Previoussatisfaction
ranking
Teaching quality 87.9 7th 88.9 4th
Happiness of child 85.0 16th 83.4 16th
Careers advice 67.8 4th 68.2 3rd
Caring teachers 67.2 12th 65.9 11th
Developing potential 64.3 17th 71.2 17th
Developing confidence 62.1 18th 56.9 15th
School facilities 61.2 1st 65.2 1st
Exam results 60.1 15th 64.9 14th
Availability of resources 56.3 11th 54.6 10th
Control of bullying 55.0 10th 57.6 9th
School security 53.7 13th 48.8 13th
School discipline 52.1 5th 49.7 7th
Choice of subjects 48.7 2nd 48.7 2nd
Developing moral values 44.9 19th 41.8 18th
Levels of homework 35.0 3rd 39.4 8th
Social health education 27.4 20th 20.1 20th
Computer access 25.7 8th 27.1 6th
Community spirit 16.2 6th 15.0 5th
Truancy control 15.8 9th 13.2 19th
School communication 13.8 14th 19.4 12th
With regard to the five criteria most important to students:
• The school performs well in: Careers advice.
• The school performs less well in: Happiness of child and Developing potential.
Student survey report – Student priorities
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 17 of 97
Importance: your school vs. similar schools
Students were asked to choose ten priorities from a list of twenty criteria. The table below shows which criteriathe students from your school selected as most important. The second column shows you the percentage ofstudents who selected each criterion as one of their ten choices, and the final column compares your school’sdata to the views from students from similar schools. Position differences of six or more have been highlightedas being worthy of note.
CriteriaImportancescore (%)
Importanceranking
Averageranking
for similarschools
Rankingdifferenceto similarschools
Teaching quality 87.9 1st 2nd +1
Happiness of child 85.0 2nd 1st -1
Careers advice 67.8 3rd 10th +7
Caring teachers 67.2 4th 8th +4
Developing potential 64.3 5th 11th +6
Developing confidence 62.1 6th 12th +6
School facilities 61.2 7th 4th -3
Exam results 60.1 8th 5th -3
Availability of resources 56.3 9th 14th +5
Control of bullying 55.0 10th 3rd -7
School security 53.7 11th 7th -4
School discipline 52.1 12th 6th -6
Choice of subjects 48.7 13th 9th -4
Developing moral values 44.9 14th 16th +2
Levels of homework 35.0 15th 13th -2
Social health education 27.4 16th 17th +1
Computer access 25.7 17th 15th -2
Community spirit 16.2 18th 19th +1
Truancy control 15.8 19th 20th +1
School communication 13.8 20th 18th -2
• Students from your school selected the following criteria as more important than students at similar schools:Careers advice, Caring teachers, Developing potential, Developing confidence and Availability of resources.
• Students from your school selected the following criteria as less important than students at similar schools:Control of bullying, School security, School discipline and Choice of subjects.
Student survey report – Student priorities
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 18 of 97
How priorities change as students get older
The graph below shows which criteria Year 12 students selected as important compared to which criteria Year12 & Year 13 students selected as important. This shows us how priorities change as the students get older.The table shows the criteria where there is a significant difference between the two groups
Student priorities
Year 12 Year 12 & Year 13
Teach
ing q
uality
Happin
ess o
f chil
d
Caree
rs a
dvice
Caring
teac
hers
Develo
ping
pote
ntial
Schoo
l facil
ities
Exam
resu
lts
Develo
ping
conf
idenc
e
Schoo
l sec
urity
Contro
l of b
ullyin
g
Schoo
l disc
ipline
Availa
bility
of
reso
urce
s
Choice
of s
ubjec
ts
Develo
ping
mor
al
value
s
Leve
ls of
hom
ewor
k
Compu
ter a
cces
s
Social
hea
lth e
duca
tion
Comm
unity
spirit
Truan
cy co
ntro
l
Schoo
l com
mun
icatio
n0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
Criteria where differencein ranking is six or more
Year 12 ranking Year 12 & Year 13 ranking
Careers advice 3rd 6th
Student survey report – Student priorities
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 19 of 97
How priorities change by gender of student
The graph below shows which criteria female students selected as important compared to which criteria malestudents selected as important. This shows us how priorities change by gender of the student. The table showsthe criteria where there is a significant difference between the two groups
Student priorities
Male students Female students
Teach
ing q
uality
Happin
ess o
f chil
d
Exam
resu
lts
Caree
rs a
dvice
Develo
ping
pote
ntial
Schoo
l facil
ities
Availa
bility
of
reso
urce
s
Caring
teac
hers
Choice
of s
ubjec
ts
Contro
l of b
ullyin
g
Schoo
l disc
ipline
Develo
ping
conf
idenc
e
Schoo
l sec
urity
Develo
ping
mor
al
value
s
Compu
ter a
cces
s
Leve
ls of
hom
ewor
k
Social
hea
lth e
duca
tion
Truan
cy co
ntro
l
Comm
unity
spirit
Schoo
l com
mun
icatio
n0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
Criteria where differencein ranking is six or more
Male students ranking Female students ranking
Happiness of child 2nd 1st
Exam results 3rd 10th
Caring teachers 8th 3rd
Choice of subjects 9th 14th
Developing confidence 12th 5th
Computer access 15th 17th
Levels of homework 16th 15th
Social health education 17th 16th
Truancy control 18th 20th
Student survey report – Student priorities
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 20 of 97
Relative student priorities for improvement
Student priorities are shown below compared to student priorities in similar schools. The school’s previousyears figures are also provided for comparison.
Criteria This survey (%) Previous survey (%) Similar schools (%)
Happiness of child 17.0 9.5 8.7
Developing confidence 11.7 11.9 4.7
Teaching quality 8.4 9.6 11.0
Developing potential 8.2 8.4 3.5
Availability of resources 7.3 6.4 3.5
Careers advice 6.7 5.9 6.2
Developing moral values 5.4 5.1 1.6
Social health education 5.1 7.1 1.9
School communication 4.8 3.0 2.4
Levels of homework 3.9 6.6 7.4
Caring teachers 3.4 3.0 3.9
School facilities 3.0 2.7 12.9
Truancy control 2.9 3.4 1.5
Community spirit 2.3 4.9 1.8
Choice of subjects 2.1 0.7 6.6
School discipline 2.0 1.3 6.0
Exam results 1.8 4.1 4.0
Control of bullying 1.7 4.0 6.1
Computer access 1.4 2.4 3.7
School security 0.8 0.0 1.9
• Students have given a higher priority to the following areas since the last survey: Happiness of child.
• Students have given a higher priority to the following areas compared to similar schools: Happiness of child,Developing confidence and Developing potential.
• Students have given a lower priority to the following areas compared to similar schools: School facilities,Choice of subjects and Control of bullying.
Student survey report – Unique questions
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 21 of 97
Unique questionsResults for your unique questions are shown below.
Students’ responses to the question: ‘How many hours of homework do you usually do in a week¸ during termtime?’
23%
43%
22%
8%
2%1%
0 - 5 hours 5 - 10 hours 10 - 15 hours 15 - 20 hours 20 + hours No answer0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Per
cent
age
Students’ responses to the question: ‘I have access to a tablet/ipad which I can use to help me with myhomework.’
65%
34%
1%
True False No answer0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Per
cent
age
Student survey report – Unique questions
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 22 of 97
Students’ responses to the question: ‘How many hours of part-time employment do you do in a normal week?’
38%
18%
28%
13%
3%
1%0%
0 0 - 5 hours 5 - 10 hours 10 - 15 hours 15 - 20 hours 20 + hours No answer0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Per
cent
age
Students’ responses to the question: ‘I received useful advice on which courses to study in sixth form.’
74%
24%
1%
True False No answer0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Per
cent
age
Student survey report – Unique questions
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 23 of 97
Students’ responses to the question: ‘I have had help and advice on applications to university/college. (Year 13only)’
39%
4%
57%
True False No answer0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Per
cent
age
Student survey report – Parent View : Student summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 24 of 97
Parent View : Student summaryBelow are the twelve "Parent View" questions. For each of the questions, we have given the weighted studentscores for any relevant criteria included on your questionnaire.
In terms of student perceptions Gold represents outstanding, green is good, black requires improvement andred is inadequate.
Score Sample
1. My child is happy at this school
Happiness of child 74.5% 521
2. My child feels safe at this school
Control of bullying 81.0% 495
School security 79.8% 525
3. My child makes good progress at this school
Developing potential 74.4% 521
4. My child is well looked after at this school
Caring teachers 80.0% 520
School security 79.8% 525
Attitude of non-teaching support staff 77.0% 519
5. My child is taught well at this school
Teaching quality 87.3% 524
Exam results 76.5% 518
Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 75.2% 520
Developing potential 74.4% 521
6. My child receives appropriate homework for their age
Respondents saying 'Right' for homework amount Outstanding 540
Levels of homework 91.4% 522
Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 75.2% 520
7. This school ensures the pupils are well behaved
School discipline 88.3% 521
Student survey report – Parent View : Student summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 25 of 97
Score Sample
8. This school deals effectively with bullying
Control of bullying 81.0% 495
9. Quality of school management
Quality of school management 87.1% 518
10. This school responds well to any concern I raise
Handling complaints 87.4% 500
Access to staff 84.6% 517
Caring teachers 80.0% 520
11. I receive valuable information from the school about my child's progress
Regular marking of work 84.1% 514
12. I would recommend this school to another parent
Recommended 94.7% 448
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 26 of 97
Ofsted self-evaluation summaryThe September 2016 Ofsted Common Inspection Framework asserts the increased importance of a school’sown self-evaluation data as the starting point of the inspection process.
The following summary is presented to allow schools to summarise their inspection self-evaluation evidenceunder the four main judgements: ‘The Quality of Teaching, Learning and Assessment’, ‘Personal Development,Behaviour and Welfare’, ‘Outcomes for Pupils’ and ‘Leadership and Management’. The effectiveness of EarlyYears and Sixth Form provision, where relevant, and the school’s promotion of ‘Spiritual, Moral, Social andCultural Development’ (SMSC) are also included.
All of these judgements feed in to the school’s Overall Effectiveness.
The evidence given here is only that achieved from this survey; it is vital that your evidence summary forOfsted also considers any other evidence that you have gathered, either from other surveys or from internalmeasurement and observation.
The Judgement areas, plus an overall summary, are broken down into sub-criteria. Scores of 1 to 4 representratings of Outstanding, Good, Requires improvement, and Inadequate, as used by Ofsted. Where any area isfound to be Inadequate then this rating will be given for the section as a whole. Criteria where evidence wasindicative rather than reliable are once again given in pink.
Remember, for grading comparisons with our colour coded system:
Gold = Outstanding = Grade 1
Green = Good = Grade 2
Black = Requires improvement = Grade 3
Red = Inadequate = Grade 4
If your grade is close to the boundary above, this is indicated with a + (plus). If your grade is close to theboundary below, this is indicated with a - (minus).
We show the strengths and weaknesses in each sub-section, where appropriate; where there are fewer thanfour criteria, these are not shown. Red criteria cannot be shown as strengths; gold criteria cannot be shown asweaknesses.
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 27 of 97
Quality of teaching, Learning and Assessment
The Effectiveness of Teaching, Learning and AssessmentTreating all students fairly and equally 93.0% Outstanding
Levels of homework 91.4% Outstanding
Further Mathematics 90.6% Outstanding
Community spirit 87.8% Outstanding
Teaching quality 87.3% Outstanding
Promoting racial harmony 85.1% Outstanding
Regular marking of work 84.1% Outstanding
English Literature 85.2% Good
Mathematics 83.5% Good
School communication 78.0% Good
Exam results 76.5% Good
Developing potential 74.4% Good
Developing confidence 73.7% Good
English Language 77.9% Requires improvement
English Language and Literature 69.8% Inadequate
Strengths
• Treating all students fairly and equally
• Levels of homework
• Further Mathematics
Weaknesses
• English Language and Literature
• English Language
• Developing confidence
Your average student grade for this section = 1.7 = Good = Grade 2 ( + )
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 28 of 97
The Accuracy and Impact of AssessmentLevels of homework 91.4% Outstanding
Regular marking of work 84.1% Outstanding
Exam results 76.5% Good
Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 75.2% Good
Developing potential 74.4% Good
Strengths
• Levels of homework
Weaknesses
• Developing potential
Your average student grade for this section = 1.6 = Good = Grade 2 ( + )
The Impact of the Teaching of Literacy, Including ReadingDrama 94.2% Outstanding
Performing Arts 89.9% Good
English Literature 85.2% Good
Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 75.2% Good
Developing potential 74.4% Good
English Language 77.9% Requires improvement
English Language and Literature 69.8% Inadequate
Strengths
• Drama
• Performing Arts
Weaknesses
• English Language and Literature
• English Language
Your average student grade for this section = 2.3 = Good = Grade 2 ( - )
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 29 of 97
The Teaching of MathematicsChemistry 96.8% Outstanding
Physics 96.7% Outstanding
ICT 93.8% Outstanding
Further Mathematics 90.6% Outstanding
Computer access 86.4% Outstanding
Biology 83.6% Good
Mathematics 83.5% Good
Computer Science 83.3% Good
Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 75.2% Good
Developing potential 74.4% Good
Science 79.3% Requires improvement
Strengths
• Chemistry
• Physics
• ICT
Weaknesses
• Science
• Developing potential
• Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability
Your average student grade for this section = 1.6 = Good = Grade 2 ( + )
Effectiveness of the Early Years Provision: Quality of Teaching, Learning and AssessmentNot applicable.
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 30 of 97
Effectiveness of the Sixth Form Provision: Quality of Teaching, Learning and AssessmentICT 105.5% Outstanding
Chemistry 96.7% Outstanding
Physics 96.7% Outstanding
Drama 94.2% Outstanding
Levels of homework 92.0% Outstanding
Further Mathematics 90.6% Outstanding
Community spirit 88.6% Outstanding
Teaching quality 86.8% Outstanding
Computer access 86.7% Outstanding
Promoting racial harmony 85.2% Outstanding
Regular marking of work 83.1% Outstanding
English Literature 86.5% Good
Biology 83.6% Good
Mathematics 83.5% Good
School communication 78.2% Good
Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 75.5% Good
Developing potential 74.4% Good
Developing confidence 74.0% Good
Science 79.3% Requires improvement
English Language 77.3% Requires improvement
Computer Science 73.9% Inadequate
Strengths
• ICT
• Chemistry
• Physics
Weaknesses
• Computer Science
• English Language
• Science
Your average student grade for this section = 1.7 = Good = Grade 2 ( + )
Summary grade – Quality of teaching, Learning and Assessment section
Your average student grade for "Quality of teaching, Learning and Assessment" = 1.8 = Good = Grade 2
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 31 of 97
To reach the next grade
In order to reach the next grade (Outstanding), the school needs to improve anything with a score below thenext grade border, and maintain or improve other criteria. In this instance, the school needs to improve thefollowing sections:
• The Effectiveness of Teaching, Learning and Assessment
• The Accuracy and Impact of Assessment
• The Impact of the Teaching of Literacy, Including Reading
• The Teaching of Mathematics
• Effectiveness of the Sixth Form Provision: Quality of Teaching, Learning and Assessment
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 32 of 97
Personal Development, Behaviour and Welfare
Behaviour: Pupils' Attitudes to School, Conduct and Behaviour, During and Outside ofLessons.School discipline 88.3% Outstanding
Community spirit 87.8% Outstanding
Promoting racial harmony 85.1% Outstanding
Control of bullying 81.0% Outstanding
Developing confidence 73.7% Good
Strengths
• School discipline
Weaknesses
• Developing confidence
Your average student grade for this section = 1.2 = Outstanding = Grade 1
Behaviour: The Effectiveness of the School's Actions to Prevent and Tackle All Forms ofBullying and Harassment.School discipline 88.3% Outstanding
Community spirit 87.8% Outstanding
Promoting racial harmony 85.1% Outstanding
Control of bullying 81.0% Outstanding
Caring teachers 80.0% Outstanding
Attitude of non-teaching support staff 77.0% Good
Encouraging and listening to students' views 75.6% Good
Developing moral values 72.0% Good
Social health education 43.3% Inadequate
Strengths
• School discipline
• Community spirit
• Promoting racial harmony
Weaknesses
• Social health education
• Developing moral values
• Encouraging and listening to students' views
Your average student grade for this section = 1.7 = Good = Grade 2 ( + )
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 33 of 97
Behaviour: The Effectiveness of the School's Actions to Prevent and TackleDiscriminatory and Derogatory Language.School discipline 88.3% Outstanding
Community spirit 87.8% Outstanding
Promoting racial harmony 85.1% Outstanding
Control of bullying 81.0% Outstanding
Attitude of non-teaching support staff 77.0% Good
Developing moral values 72.0% Good
Strengths
• School discipline
• Community spirit
Weaknesses
• Developing moral values
• Attitude of non-teaching support staff
Your average student grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - )
Personal Development and Welfare: Pride in Achievement and Commitment to LearningSchool discipline 88.3% Outstanding
Community spirit 87.8% Outstanding
Encouraging and listening to students' views 75.6% Good
Celebrating and rewarding achievement 75.6% Good
Happiness of child 74.5% Good
Developing potential 74.4% Good
Developing confidence 73.7% Good
Developing moral values 72.0% Good
Strengths
• School discipline
• Community spirit
• Encouraging and listening to students' views
Weaknesses
• Developing moral values
• Developing confidence
• Developing potential
Your average student grade for this section = 1.8 = Good = Grade 2 ( + )
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 34 of 97
Personal Development and Welfare: Self-confidence, Self-awareness and UnderstandingHow to be a Successful LearnerEncouraging and listening to students' views 75.6% Good
Celebrating and rewarding achievement 75.6% Good
Developing potential 74.4% Good
Developing confidence 73.7% Good
Strengths
• Encouraging and listening to students' views
Weaknesses
• Developing confidence
Your average student grade for this section = 2.0 = Good = Grade 2
Personal Development and Welfare: Choices About Next StagesLevels of homework 91.4% Outstanding
Careers advice 89.2% Outstanding
Attitude of non-teaching support staff 77.0% Good
Celebrating and rewarding achievement 75.6% Good
Strengths
• Levels of homework
Weaknesses
• Celebrating and rewarding achievement
Your average student grade for this section = 1.5 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - )
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 35 of 97
Personal Development and Welfare: Keeping Safe from Abuse, Exploitation andExtremismSchool discipline 88.3% Outstanding
Community spirit 87.8% Outstanding
Promoting racial harmony 85.1% Outstanding
Control of bullying 81.0% Outstanding
Caring teachers 80.0% Outstanding
School security 79.8% Good
Attitude of non-teaching support staff 77.0% Good
Encouraging and listening to students' views 75.6% Good
Developing moral values 72.0% Good
Social health education 43.3% Inadequate
Strengths
• School discipline
• Community spirit
• Promoting racial harmony
Weaknesses
• Social health education
• Developing moral values
• Encouraging and listening to students' views
Your average student grade for this section = 1.7 = Good = Grade 2 ( + )
Personal Development and Welfare: Keeping HealthySocial health education 43.3% Inadequate
Diet 34.6% Inadequate
Exercise 31.4% Inadequate
Your average student grade for this section = 4.0 = Inadequate = Grade 4 ( + )
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 36 of 97
Personal Development and Welfare: Personal DevelopmentCareers advice 89.2% Outstanding
Community spirit 87.8% Outstanding
Promoting racial harmony 85.1% Outstanding
Control of bullying 81.0% Outstanding
Religious Studies 84.8% Good
Encouraging and listening to students' views 75.6% Good
Developing potential 74.4% Good
Developing confidence 73.7% Good
Developing moral values 72.0% Good
Encouraging local community activity 67.5% Requires improvement
Social health education 43.3% Inadequate
Strengths
• Careers advice
• Community spirit
• Promoting racial harmony
Weaknesses
• Social health education
• Encouraging local community activity
• Developing moral values
Your average student grade for this section = 1.9 = Good = Grade 2
Attendance and PunctualityTruancy control 82.9% Outstanding
Your average student grade for this section = 1.0 = Outstanding = Grade 1
Effectiveness of the Early Years Provision: Personal Development, Behaviour and WelfareNot applicable.
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 37 of 97
Effectiveness of the Sixth Form Provision: Personal Development, Behaviour and WelfareTreating all students fairly and equally 93.2% Outstanding
Levels of homework 92.0% Outstanding
Careers advice 88.9% Outstanding
Community spirit 88.6% Outstanding
School discipline 88.4% Outstanding
Teaching quality 86.8% Outstanding
Promoting racial harmony 85.2% Outstanding
Truancy control 83.2% Outstanding
Regular marking of work 83.1% Outstanding
Control of bullying 80.2% Outstanding
Religious Studies 84.8% Good
Caring teachers 79.9% Good
School security 79.8% Good
School communication 78.2% Good
Attitude of non-teaching support staff 77.0% Good
Exam results 76.6% Good
Encouraging and listening to students' views 75.6% Good
Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 75.5% Good
Celebrating and rewarding achievement 75.0% Good
Happiness of child 74.5% Good
Developing potential 74.4% Good
Developing confidence 74.0% Good
Developing moral values 72.0% Good
Encouraging local community activity 67.0% Requires improvement
Social health education 43.6% Inadequate
Strengths
• Treating all students fairly and equally
• Levels of homework
• Careers advice
Weaknesses
• Social health education
• Encouraging local community activity
• Developing moral values
Your average student grade for this section = 1.7 = Good = Grade 2 ( + )
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 38 of 97
Summary grade – Personal Development, Behaviour and Welfare section
Your average student grade for "Personal Development, Behaviour and Welfare" = 1.8 = Good = Grade 2
To reach the next grade
In order to reach the next grade (Outstanding), the school needs to improve anything with a score below thenext grade border, and maintain or improve other criteria. In this instance, the school needs to improve thefollowing sections:
• Behaviour: The Effectiveness of the School's Actions to Prevent and Tackle All Forms of Bullying andHarassment.
• Personal Development and Welfare: Pride in Achievement and Commitment to Learning
• Personal Development and Welfare: Self-confidence, Self-awareness and Understanding How to be aSuccessful Learner
• Personal Development and Welfare: Keeping Safe from Abuse, Exploitation and Extremism
• Personal Development and Welfare: Keeping Healthy
• Personal Development and Welfare: Personal Development
• Effectiveness of the Sixth Form Provision: Personal Development, Behaviour and Welfare
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 39 of 97
Outcomes for Pupils
ProgressFurther Mathematics 90.6% Outstanding
English Literature 85.2% Good
Mathematics 83.5% Good
Exam results 76.5% Good
Developing potential 74.4% Good
Developing confidence 73.7% Good
English Language 77.9% Requires improvement
English Language and Literature 69.8% Inadequate
Strengths
• Further Mathematics
• English Literature
• Mathematics
Weaknesses
• English Language and Literature
• English Language
• Developing confidence
Your average student grade for this section = 2.3 = Good = Grade 2
Progress Over TimeAverage of academic subject ratings Good
Significant improvements versus significant declines Inadequate
Your average student grade for this section = 3.0 = Requires improvement = Grade 3
Pupils' Attainment in Relation to National Standards and Compared With All SchoolsAchievement in relation to national standards Outstanding
Average of academic subject ratings Good
Your average student grade for this section = 1.5 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - )
Achievements of Those Eligible for the Pupil PremiumYour own assessment is required here.
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 40 of 97
The Most Able PupilsTailoring workload to childs needs and ability 75.2% Good
Developing potential 74.4% Good
Developing confidence 73.7% Good
Your average student grade for this section = 2.0 = Good = Grade 2
Disabled Pupils and Those with Special Educational NeedsTreating all students fairly and equally 93.0% Outstanding
Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 75.2% Good
Developing potential 74.4% Good
Developing confidence 73.7% Good
Strengths
• Treating all students fairly and equally
Weaknesses
• Developing confidence
Your average student grade for this section = 1.8 = Good = Grade 2 ( + )
Effectiveness of the Early Years Provision: Outcomes for PupilsNot applicable.
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 41 of 97
Effectiveness of the Sixth Form Provision: Outcomes for PupilsTreating all students fairly and equally 93.2% Outstanding
Further Mathematics 90.6% Outstanding
English Literature 86.5% Good
Mathematics 83.5% Good
Exam results 76.6% Good
Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 75.5% Good
Developing potential 74.4% Good
Developing confidence 74.0% Good
English Language 77.3% Requires improvement
Strengths
• Treating all students fairly and equally
• Further Mathematics
• English Literature
Weaknesses
• English Language
• Developing confidence
• Developing potential
Your average student grade for this section = 1.9 = Good = Grade 2
Summary grade – Outcomes for Pupils section
Your average student grade for "Outcomes for Pupils" = 2.1 = Good = Grade 2
To reach the next grade
In order to reach the next grade (Outstanding), the school needs to improve anything with a score below thenext grade border, and maintain or improve other criteria. In this instance, the school needs to improve thefollowing sections:
• Progress
• Progress Over Time
• The Most Able Pupils
• Disabled Pupils and Those with Special Educational Needs
• Effectiveness of the Sixth Form Provision: Outcomes for Pupils
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 42 of 97
Effectiveness of the Sixth Form Provision
Quality of Teaching, Learning and AssessmentICT 105.5% Outstanding
Chemistry 96.7% Outstanding
Physics 96.7% Outstanding
Drama 94.2% Outstanding
Treating all students fairly and equally 93.2% Outstanding
Levels of homework 92.0% Outstanding
Further Mathematics 90.6% Outstanding
Community spirit 88.6% Outstanding
Teaching quality 86.8% Outstanding
Computer access 86.7% Outstanding
Promoting racial harmony 85.2% Outstanding
Regular marking of work 83.1% Outstanding
English Literature 86.5% Good
Biology 83.6% Good
Mathematics 83.5% Good
School communication 78.2% Good
Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 75.5% Good
Developing potential 74.4% Good
Developing confidence 74.0% Good
Science 79.3% Requires improvement
English Language 77.3% Requires improvement
Computer Science 73.9% Inadequate
Strengths
• ICT
• Chemistry
• Physics
Weaknesses
• Computer Science
• English Language
• Science
Your average student grade for this section = 1.6 = Good = Grade 2 ( + )
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 43 of 97
Personal Development, Behaviour and WelfareTreating all students fairly and equally 93.2% Outstanding
Levels of homework 92.0% Outstanding
Careers advice 88.9% Outstanding
Community spirit 88.6% Outstanding
School discipline 88.4% Outstanding
Teaching quality 86.8% Outstanding
Promoting racial harmony 85.2% Outstanding
Truancy control 83.2% Outstanding
Regular marking of work 83.1% Outstanding
Control of bullying 80.2% Outstanding
Religious Studies 84.8% Good
Caring teachers 79.9% Good
School security 79.8% Good
School communication 78.2% Good
Attitude of non-teaching support staff 77.0% Good
Exam results 76.6% Good
Encouraging and listening to students' views 75.6% Good
Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 75.5% Good
Celebrating and rewarding achievement 75.0% Good
Happiness of child 74.5% Good
Developing potential 74.4% Good
Developing confidence 74.0% Good
Developing moral values 72.0% Good
Encouraging local community activity 67.0% Requires improvement
Social health education 43.6% Inadequate
Strengths
• Treating all students fairly and equally
• Levels of homework
• Careers advice
Weaknesses
• Social health education
• Encouraging local community activity
• Developing moral values
Your average student grade for this section = 1.7 = Good = Grade 2 ( + )
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 44 of 97
Outcomes for PupilsTreating all students fairly and equally 93.2% Outstanding
Further Mathematics 90.6% Outstanding
English Literature 86.5% Good
Mathematics 83.5% Good
Exam results 76.6% Good
Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 75.5% Good
Developing potential 74.4% Good
Developing confidence 74.0% Good
English Language 77.3% Requires improvement
Strengths
• Treating all students fairly and equally
• Further Mathematics
• English Literature
Weaknesses
• English Language
• Developing confidence
• Developing potential
Your average student grade for this section = 1.9 = Good = Grade 2
Summary grade – Effectiveness of the Sixth Form Provision section
Your average student grade for "Effectiveness of the Sixth Form Provision" = 1.7 = Good = Grade 2 ( + )
To reach the next grade
In order to reach the next grade (Outstanding), the school needs to improve anything with a score below thenext grade border, and maintain or improve other criteria. In this instance, the school needs to improve thefollowing sections:
• Quality of Teaching, Learning and Assessment
• Personal Development, Behaviour and Welfare
• Outcomes for Pupils
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 45 of 97
Effectiveness of Leadership and Management
Vision and ValuesSchool discipline 88.3% Outstanding
Community spirit 87.8% Outstanding
Promoting racial harmony 85.1% Outstanding
Control of bullying 81.0% Outstanding
Average of academic subject ratings Good
School communication 78.0% Good
Exam results 76.5% Good
Celebrating and rewarding achievement 75.6% Good
Developing potential 74.4% Good
Developing confidence 73.7% Good
Developing moral values 72.0% Good
Strengths
• School discipline
• Community spirit
• Promoting racial harmony
Weaknesses
• Developing moral values
• Developing confidence
• Developing potential
Your average student grade for this section = 1.6 = Good = Grade 2 ( + )
Self-evaluation and ImprovementExam results 76.5% Good
Encouraging and listening to students' views 75.6% Good
Criteria improving since previous surveys Requires improvement
Significant improvements versus significant declines Inadequate
Strengths
• Exam results
Weaknesses
• Significant improvements versus significant declines
Your average student grade for this section = 2.8 = Requires improvement = Grade 3 ( + )
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 46 of 97
CurriculumChoice of subjects 99.9% Outstanding
Drama 94.2% Outstanding
Further Mathematics 90.6% Outstanding
Careers advice 89.2% Outstanding
Performing Arts 89.9% Good
English Literature 85.2% Good
Religious Studies 84.8% Good
Mathematics 83.5% Good
Physical Education 80.5% Good
Exam results 76.5% Good
Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 75.2% Good
Developing potential 74.4% Good
English Language 77.9% Requires improvement
Encouraging local community activity 67.5% Requires improvement
English Language and Literature 69.8% Inadequate
Art 59.8% Inadequate
Strengths
• Choice of subjects
• Drama
• Further Mathematics
Weaknesses
• Art
• English Language and Literature
• Encouraging local community activity
Your average student grade for this section = 2.1 = Good = Grade 2
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 47 of 97
CitizenshipTreating all students fairly and equally 93.0% Outstanding
School discipline 88.3% Outstanding
Community spirit 87.8% Outstanding
Promoting racial harmony 85.1% Outstanding
Control of bullying 81.0% Outstanding
Religious Studies 84.8% Good
Developing moral values 72.0% Good
Social health education 43.3% Inadequate
Strengths
• Treating all students fairly and equally
• School discipline
• Community spirit
Weaknesses
• Social health education
• Developing moral values
• Religious Studies
Your average student grade for this section = 1.6 = Good = Grade 2 ( + )
LeadershipQuality of school management 87.1% Outstanding
Average of academic subject ratings Good
School communication 78.0% Good
Encouraging and listening to students' views 75.6% Good
Criteria improving since previous surveys Requires improvement
Strengths
• Quality of school management
Weaknesses
• Criteria improving since previous surveys
Your average student grade for this section = 2.0 = Good = Grade 2
Continuous Professional DevelopmentYour own assessment is required here.
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 48 of 97
SafeguardingTreating all students fairly and equally 93.0% Outstanding
School discipline 88.3% Outstanding
Community spirit 87.8% Outstanding
Quality of school management 87.1% Outstanding
Promoting racial harmony 85.1% Outstanding
Truancy control 82.9% Outstanding
Control of bullying 81.0% Outstanding
Caring teachers 80.0% Outstanding
School security 79.8% Good
Attitude of non-teaching support staff 77.0% Good
Developing moral values 72.0% Good
Social health education 43.3% Inadequate
Strengths
• Treating all students fairly and equally
• School discipline
• Community spirit
Weaknesses
• Social health education
• Developing moral values
• Attitude of non-teaching support staff
Your average student grade for this section = 1.5 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - )
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 49 of 97
GovernanceTreating all students fairly and equally 93.0% Outstanding
Quality of school management 87.1% Outstanding
Promoting racial harmony 85.1% Outstanding
School security 79.8% Good
School communication 78.0% Good
Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 75.2% Good
Strengths
• Treating all students fairly and equally
• Quality of school management
Weaknesses
• Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability
• School communication
Your average student grade for this section = 1.5 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - )
Use of the Pupil PremiumYour own assessment is required here.
Effectiveness of the Early Years Provision: Leadership and ManagementNot applicable.
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 50 of 97
Effectiveness of the Sixth Form Provision: Leadership and ManagementChoice of subjects 100.3% Outstanding
Drama 94.2% Outstanding
Treating all students fairly and equally 93.2% Outstanding
Further Mathematics 90.6% Outstanding
Careers advice 88.9% Outstanding
Community spirit 88.6% Outstanding
School discipline 88.4% Outstanding
Quality of school management 87.1% Outstanding
Promoting racial harmony 85.2% Outstanding
Truancy control 83.2% Outstanding
Control of bullying 80.2% Outstanding
Average of academic subject ratings Good
English Literature 86.5% Good
Religious Studies 84.8% Good
Mathematics 83.5% Good
Physical Education 80.5% Good
Caring teachers 79.9% Good
School security 79.8% Good
School communication 78.2% Good
Attitude of non-teaching support staff 77.0% Good
Exam results 76.6% Good
Encouraging and listening to students' views 75.6% Good
Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability 75.5% Good
Celebrating and rewarding achievement 75.0% Good
Developing potential 74.4% Good
Developing confidence 74.0% Good
Developing moral values 72.0% Good
English Language 77.3% Requires improvement
Encouraging local community activity 67.0% Requires improvement
Art 62.6% Inadequate
Social health education 43.6% Inadequate
(Continued on the next page)
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 51 of 97
Strengths
• Choice of subjects
• Drama
• Treating all students fairly and equally
Weaknesses
• Social health education
• Art
• Encouraging local community activity
Your average student grade for this section = 1.8 = Good = Grade 2
Summary grade – Effectiveness of Leadership and Management section
Your average student grade for "Effectiveness of Leadership and Management" = 1.9 = Good = Grade 2
To reach the next grade
In order to reach the next grade (Outstanding), the school needs to improve anything with a score below thenext grade border, and maintain or improve other criteria. In this instance, the school needs to improve thefollowing sections:
• Vision and Values
• Self-evaluation and Improvement
• Curriculum
• Citizenship
• Leadership
• Effectiveness of the Sixth Form Provision: Leadership and Management
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 52 of 97
Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development
Spiritual DevelopmentMusic 98.8% Outstanding
Drama 94.2% Outstanding
Community spirit 87.8% Outstanding
Promoting racial harmony 85.1% Outstanding
Performing Arts 89.9% Good
English Literature 85.2% Good
Religious Studies 84.8% Good
Encouraging and listening to students' views 75.6% Good
Happiness of child 74.5% Good
English Language 77.9% Requires improvement
English Language and Literature 69.8% Inadequate
Art 59.8% Inadequate
Strengths
• Music
• Drama
• Community spirit
Weaknesses
• Art
• English Language and Literature
• English Language
Your average student grade for this section = 2.1 = Good = Grade 2
Moral DevelopmentSchool discipline 88.3% Outstanding
Community spirit 87.8% Outstanding
Religious Studies 84.8% Good
Developing moral values 72.0% Good
Social health education 43.3% Inadequate
Strengths
• School discipline
Weaknesses
• Social health education
Your average student grade for this section = 2.0 = Good = Grade 2
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 53 of 97
Social DevelopmentCommunity spirit 87.8% Outstanding
Promoting racial harmony 85.1% Outstanding
Control of bullying 81.0% Outstanding
Developing confidence 73.7% Good
Developing moral values 72.0% Good
Encouraging local community activity 67.5% Requires improvement
Social health education 43.3% Inadequate
Strengths
• Community spirit
• Promoting racial harmony
Weaknesses
• Social health education
• Encouraging local community activity
Your average student grade for this section = 2.0 = Good = Grade 2
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 54 of 97
Cultural DevelopmentMusic 98.8% Outstanding
Drama 94.2% Outstanding
History 91.6% Outstanding
Ancient History 91.1% Outstanding
Community spirit 87.8% Outstanding
Promoting racial harmony 85.1% Outstanding
Performing Arts 89.9% Good
English Literature 85.2% Good
Religious Studies 84.8% Good
Physical Education 80.5% Good
English Language 77.9% Requires improvement
Encouraging local community activity 67.5% Requires improvement
English Language and Literature 69.8% Inadequate
Art 59.8% Inadequate
Strengths
• Music
• Drama
• History
Weaknesses
• Art
• English Language and Literature
• Encouraging local community activity
Your average student grade for this section = 2.0 = Good = Grade 2
Summary grade – Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development section
Your average student grade for "Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development" = 2.0 = Good = Grade 2
To reach the next grade
In order to reach the next grade (Outstanding), the school needs to improve anything with a score below thenext grade border, and maintain or improve other criteria. In this instance, the school needs to improve thefollowing sections:
• Spiritual Development
• Moral Development
• Social Development
• Cultural Development
Student survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 55 of 97
Overall effectiveness
SummaryQuality of teaching, Learning and Assessment 1.8 Good Grade 2
Personal Development, Behaviour and Welfare 1.8 Good Grade 2
Outcomes for Pupils 2.1 Good Grade 2
Effectiveness of the Sixth Form Provision 1.7 Good Grade 2 ( + )
Effectiveness of Leadership and Management 1.9 Good Grade 2
Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development 2.0 Good Grade 2
Summary grade – Overall effectiveness
Your average grade for "Overall effectiveness" = 1.9 = Good = Grade 2
To reach the next grade
In order to reach the next grade (Outstanding), the school needs to improve anything with a score below thenext grade border, and maintain or improve other criteria. In this instance, the school needs to improve thefollowing sections:
• Quality of teaching, Learning and Assessment
• Personal Development, Behaviour and Welfare
• Outcomes for Pupils
• Effectiveness of the Sixth Form Provision
• Effectiveness of Leadership and Management
• Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development
Student survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 56 of 97
Standard analysis
Gender analysis
This section of the report provides an analysis of student scores and priorities broken down by gender, to see ifthere are any differences of significance worth noting.
Satisfaction scores for academic criteria
Male Female
Ancien
t Hist
ory
Art Pho
togr
aphy
Geogr
aphy
Gover
nmen
t and
Poli
tics
Econo
mics
Histor
y
Furth
er M
athe
mat
ics
Chem
istry
Englis
h Lit
erat
ure
Physic
al Edu
catio
n
Physic
s
Scienc
e
Mat
hem
atics
Busine
ss A
pplie
d
Psych
ology
Biolog
y0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
Academic criteria wheredifference is significant
Male satisfaction score (%) Female satisfaction score (%)
Physics 87.4 100.0
Student survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 57 of 97
Satisfaction scores for non-academic criteria
Male Female
Schoo
l sec
urity
Schoo
l disc
ipline
Exam
resu
lts
Caring
teac
hers
Schoo
l facil
ities
Develo
ping
pote
ntial
Choice
of s
ubjec
ts
Truan
cy co
ntro
l
Happin
ess o
f chil
d
Caree
rs a
dvice
Compu
ter a
cces
s
Develo
ping
mor
al va
lues
Teach
ing q
uality
Comm
unity
spirit
Leve
ls of
hom
ewor
k
Schoo
l com
mun
icatio
n
Contro
l of b
ullyin
g
Availa
bility
of r
esou
rces
Develo
ping
conf
idenc
e
Social
hea
lth e
duca
tion
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
Non-academic criteria wheredifference is significant
Male satisfaction score (%) Female satisfaction score (%)
Happiness of child 85.3 77.0
Careers advice 82.0 71.0
School communication 76.5 84.6
Control of bullying 75.6 66.3
Student survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 58 of 97
Satisfaction scores for additional criteria
Male Female
Libra
ry fa
cilitie
s
Acces
s to
staff
Trans
fer f
rom
pre
vious
scho
ol
Celebr
ating
and
rewar
ding
achie
vem
ent
Quality
of s
choo
l man
agem
ent
Attitud
e of
non
-teac
hing
supp
ortsta
ff
Handli
ng co
mpla
ints
Tailor
ing w
orklo
ad to
child
s
need
s and
abil
ity
Out o
f sch
ool a
ctivit
ies a
nd cl
ubs
Prom
oting
racia
l har
mon
y
Schoo
l mea
ls
Treat
ing a
ll stu
dent
s fair
ly an
d
equa
lly
Regula
r mar
king
of w
ork
Encou
ragin
g an
d lis
tenin
g to
stude
nts'
views
Encou
ragin
g loc
al co
mm
unity
activ
ity0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
Additional criteria wheredifference is significant
Male satisfaction score (%) Female satisfaction score (%)
Handling complaints 85.2 78.0
Promoting racial harmony 84.1 93.5
Regular marking of work 78.4 62.1
Encouraging local community activity 53.8 41.2
Student survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 59 of 97
Healthy lifestyle
This section of the report summarises perceptions of whether students are encouraged to live healthy lifestyles.
Students’ responses to the question: ‘School encourages healthy lifestyle through diet’
This survey Similar schools
35%
65%
52%
48%
Yes No0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Per
cent
age
Students’ responses to the question: ‘School encourages healthy lifestyle through exercise’
This survey Similar schools
31%
69%66%
34%
Yes No0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Per
cent
age
Student survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 60 of 97
Student home environment
This section of the report summarises student responses to the home environment questions, broken down byyear group and gender.
Students’ responses to the question: ‘My parents want to know what I am learning about at school.’ brokendown by gender
This survey Similar schools
80%
84%
All students0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Per
cent
age
80%82%
79%
All students Male students Female students0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Per
cent
age
Students’ responses to the question: ‘My parents want to know what I am learning about at school.’ brokendown by year group
81%78%
Year 12 Year 130%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Per
cent
age
Student survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 61 of 97
Students’ responses to the question: ‘At home, there is somewhere where I can work in peace and quiet if I wantto.’ broken down by gender
This survey Similar schools
92%
87%
All students0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
92%94%
91%
All students Male students Female students0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
Students’ responses to the question: ‘At home, there is somewhere where I can work in peace and quiet if I wantto.’ broken down by year group
94%
90%
Year 12 Year 130%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
Student survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 62 of 97
Students’ responses to the question: ‘My parents often look at my work to see how well I am doing at school.’broken down by gender
This survey Similar schools
41%
61%
All students0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Per
cent
age
41%
49%
34%
All students Male students Female students0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Per
cent
age
Students’ responses to the question: ‘My parents often look at my work to see how well I am doing at school.’broken down by year group
40% 40%
Year 12 Year 130%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Per
cent
age
Student survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 63 of 97
Students’ responses to the question: ‘My parents would try to help me with my homework if I asked them to.’broken down by gender
This survey Similar schools
85%
94%
All students0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
85%87%
84%
All students Male students Female students0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
Students’ responses to the question: ‘My parents would try to help me with my homework if I asked them to.’broken down by year group
86%84%
Year 12 Year 130%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
Student survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 64 of 97
Students’ responses to the question: ‘My parents often check that I have done all of my homework.’ brokendown by gender
This survey Similar schools
38%
87%
All students0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
38%
44%
33%
All students Male students Female students0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Per
cent
age
Students’ responses to the question: ‘My parents often check that I have done all of my homework.’ brokendown by year group
41%
34%
Year 12 Year 130%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Per
cent
age
Student survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 65 of 97
Student values
This section of the report summarises student values and experiences.
Students’ responses to the question: ‘I have not been bullied by other students recently.’
This survey Similar schools
93%
81%
All students0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
Students’ responses to the question: ‘I am usually treated fairly by teachers or other members of staff.’
This survey Similar schools
90%86%
All students0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
Student survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 66 of 97
Students’ responses to the question: ‘What do you think of school discipline?’
9%
83%
7%
Too strict About right Not strict enough0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Per
cent
age
Student survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 67 of 97
Homework
This section of the report provides a summary of time spent on homework broken down by year group.Comparable data is provided from the last survey and from similar schools.
For this question, schools typically achieve more than 40% of students who choose “about right”.
Students’ perceptions of the amount of homework given
Not enough Too variable Too much About right
6%5%
6%
21%22%
21%
16% 17%
14%
57%56%
59%
All students Year 12 Year 130%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Per
cent
age
Student survey report – Year group analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 68 of 97
Year group analysis
Analysis of year group scores compared to national average
The graphs in this section of the report show the scores achieved for each of the surveyed criteria, brokendown by year group, compared to the national averages. The purple line shows the scores achieved from theaverage of similar schools, where these averages are available. If the bar is above the line, students in thatyear group are more satisfied than the national average. If the bar is below the line, students in that year groupare less satisfied than the national average.
Criteria where evidence was indicative rather than reliable are once again shown in pink.
Year groups where there were fewer than 10 respondents for a criterion are not shown. Note that the yeargroup scores are un-weighted.
Year group analysis compared to national averages for academic criteria
Art
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Art Photography
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Biology
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Business
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Student survey report – Year group analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 69 of 97
Business Applied
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Chemistry
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Dance
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Drama
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Economics
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
English Language
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
English Literature
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
French
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Student survey report – Year group analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 70 of 97
Further Mathematics
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Geography
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Government and Politics
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Health and Social Care
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
History
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Mathematics
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Media Studies
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Physical Education
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Student survey report – Year group analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 71 of 97
Physics
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Psychology
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Religious Studies
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Science
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Sociology
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Spanish
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Year group analysis compared to national averages for non-academiccriteria
School discipline
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Community spirit
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Student survey report – Year group analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 72 of 97
School security
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Social health education
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Control of bullying
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Careers advice
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Levels of homework
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Developing potential
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Exam results
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Developing confidence
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Student survey report – Year group analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 73 of 97
Availability of resources
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
School facilities
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Caring teachers
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
School communication
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Developing moral values
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Happiness of child
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Choice of subjects
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Teaching quality
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Student survey report – Year group analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 74 of 97
Computer access
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Truancy control
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Year group analysis compared to national averages for your additionalsurveyed criteria
Promoting racial harmony
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Access to staff
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Handling complaints
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Quality of school management
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Regular marking of work
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Attitude of non-teaching support staff
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Student survey report – Year group analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 75 of 97
School meals
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Treating all students fairly and equally
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Celebrating and rewarding achievement
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Encouraging local community activity
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Encouraging and listening to students' views
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Transfer from previous school
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Library facilities
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Student survey report – Year group analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 76 of 97
Out of school activities and clubs
Year 12 Year 130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Student survey report – Time series analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 77 of 97
Time series analysis
Graphs showing trends for surveyed criteria over time
The graphs in this section of the report show the trends for surveyed criteria, broken down over time.
Note that these results are un-weighted and year names refer to the end of the academic year. Statisticallysignificant increases in scores over time are shown in green. Statistically significant decreases in scores overtime are shown in red.
Example time series graphs
History
2015 2016 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Science
2015 2016 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Extra curricular activities
2015 2016 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Careers advice
2015 2016 201740%
60%
80%
100%
The score for Historyhas significantlyincreased over the lastthree surveys.
The score for Sciencehas significantlydecreased since thelast survey.
The score for Extracurricular activities hassignificantly increasedsince the last survey.
There has been nostatistical differencein scores for Careersadvice over the lastthree surveys.
Student survey report – Time series analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 78 of 97
Score trends over time for academic criteria
Ancient History
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Biology
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Business
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Business Applied
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Chemistry
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Computer Science
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Drama
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Economics
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Student survey report – Time series analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 79 of 97
English Language
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
English Language and Literature
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
English Literature
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
French
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Further Mathematics
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Geography
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
German
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Government and Politics
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Student survey report – Time series analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 80 of 97
Health and Social Care
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
History
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
ICT
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Mathematics
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Media Studies
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Music
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Music Technology
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Performing Arts
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Student survey report – Time series analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 81 of 97
Physical Education
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Physics
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Psychology
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Religious Studies
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Science
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Sociology
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Spanish
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Student survey report – Time series analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 82 of 97
Score trends over time for non-academic criteria
School discipline
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Community spirit
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
School security
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Social health education
2011 2013 2015 201720%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Control of bullying
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Careers advice
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Levels of homework
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Developing potential
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Student survey report – Time series analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 83 of 97
Exam results
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Developing confidence
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Availability of resources
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
School facilities
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Caring teachers
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
School communication
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Developing moral values
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Happiness of child
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Student survey report – Time series analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 84 of 97
Choice of subjects
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Teaching quality
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Computer access
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Truancy control
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Score trends over time for additional criteria
Promoting racial harmony
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Access to staff
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Handling complaints
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Quality of school management
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Student survey report – Time series analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 85 of 97
Regular marking of work
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Attitude of non-teaching support staff
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
School meals
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Treating all students fairly and equally
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Celebrating and rewarding achievement
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Tailoring workload to childs needs and ability
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Encouraging local community activity
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Encouraging and listening to students' views
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Student survey report – Time series analysis
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 86 of 97
Transfer from previous school
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Library facilities
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Out of school activities and clubs
2011 2013 2015 201740%
60%
80%
100%
Student survey report – Appendix
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 87 of 97
AppendixSupplementary data and score breakdowns.
Academic criteria analysis
A breakdown of how students scored their progress in academic subjects.
Academic criteriaMaking goodprogress (1)
Not makingprogress (2)
GraphSample
size
Ancient History 95.0% 5.0%1 2
20
Art 58.8% 41.2%1 2
17
Art Photography 92.0% 8.0%1 2
29
Biology 83.0% 17.0%1 2
143
Business 75.4% 24.6%1 2
21
Business Applied 85.8% 14.2%1 2
46
Chemistry 91.2% 8.8%1 2
154
Computer Science 78.9% 21.1%1 2
19
Dance 89.5% 10.5%1 2
19
Drama 91.5% 8.5%1 2
27
Student survey report – Appendix
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 88 of 97
Academic criteriaMaking goodprogress (1)
Not makingprogress (2)
GraphSample
size
Economics 88.5% 11.5%1 2
41
English GCSE Resit 63.6% 36.4%1 2
11
English Language 76.8% 23.2%1 2
26
English Language and Literature 73.3% 26.7%1 2
15
English Literature 92.2% 7.8%1 2
63
Food Technology 100.0% 0.0%1 2
14
French 79.0% 21.0%1 2
25
Further Mathematics 91.5% 8.5%1 2
42
Geography 94.3% 5.7%1 2
70
Geology 100.0% 0.0%1 2
13
German 100.0% 0.0%1 2
10
Government and Politics 87.3% 12.7%1 2
57
Student survey report – Appendix
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 89 of 97
Academic criteriaMaking goodprogress (1)
Not makingprogress (2)
GraphSample
size
Health and Social Care 96.9% 3.1%1 2
33
History 93.6% 6.4%1 2
93
ICT 88.9% 11.1%1 2
18
Mathematics 84.2% 15.8%1 2
172
Media Studies 80.0% 20.0%1 2
27
Music 92.3% 7.7%1 2
13
Performing Arts 90.0% 10.0%1 2
10
Physical Education 87.8% 12.2%1 2
38
Physics 86.1% 13.9%1 2
93
Product Design 92.9% 7.1%1 2
14
Psychology 81.6% 18.4%1 2
103
Religious Studies 74.2% 25.8%1 2
54
Student survey report – Appendix
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 90 of 97
Academic criteriaMaking goodprogress (1)
Not makingprogress (2)
GraphSample
size
Science 80.7% 19.3%1 2
41
Sociology 87.7% 12.3%1 2
47
Spanish 91.3% 8.7%1 2
23
Sport (BTEC) 92.3% 7.7%1 2
13
Statistics 68.4% 31.6%1 2
19
Student survey report – Appendix
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 91 of 97
Non-academic criteria analysis
How students scored the delivery and management of non-academic criteria.
Non-academic criteria True (T) False (F) GraphSample
size
School discipline 95.6% 3.6%T F
521
Community spirit 79.9% 17.9%T F
514
School security 97.2% 2.8%T F
525
Social health education 33.4% 65.5%T F
521
Control of bullying 65.7% 28.6%T F
495
Careers advice 74.5% 24.6%T F
521
Levels of homework 77.9% 20.9%T F
522
Developing potential 87.4% 11.1%T F
521
Exam results 91.5% 7.1%T F
518
Developing confidence 65.4% 32.3%T F
513
Availability of resources 73.0% 25.9%T F
522
Student survey report – Appendix
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 92 of 97
Non-academic criteria True (T) False (F) GraphSample
size
School facilities 93.1% 5.7%T F
522
Caring teachers 91.3% 7.4%T F
520
School communication 80.0% 18.4%T F
518
Developing moral values 79.7% 16.8%T F
512
Happiness of child 79.3% 19.8%T F
521
Choice of subjects 89.7% 9.1%T F
522
Teaching quality 78.9% 20.7%T F
524
Computer access 80.5% 17.7%T F
520
Truancy control 90.4% 9.2%T F
524
Student survey report – Appendix
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 93 of 97
Additional criteria analysis
How students scored the delivery and management of your additional non-academic criteria.
Additional criteria True (T) False (F) GraphSample
size
Promoting racial harmony 89.0% 9.9%T F
519
Access to staff 91.1% 7.2%T F
517
Handling complaints 77.0% 18.1%T F
500
Quality of school management 89.6% 9.0%T F
518
Regular marking of work 66.1% 31.7%T F
514
Attitude of non-teaching support staff 88.6% 10.2%T F
519
School meals 81.8% 17.4%T F
521
Treating all students fairly and equally 79.7% 18.4%T F
520
Celebrating and rewarding achievement 85.8% 13.4%T F
522
Tailoring workload to childs needs andability
84.7% 13.5%T F
520
Encouraging local community activity 46.3% 52.4%T F
520
Student survey report – Appendix
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 94 of 97
Additional criteria True (T) False (F) GraphSample
size
Encouraging and listening to students'views
64.5% 32.8%T F
511
Transfer from previous school 89.5% 3.7%T F
490
Library facilities 96.6% 1.9%T F
519
Out of school activities and clubs 85.4% 12.6%T F
516
Student survey report – Appendix
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 95 of 97
Graphs to show raw, adjusted satisfaction scores achieved for each ofthe criterion surveyed, before weightings are applied.
Academic subjects (1 of 2)
100% 100% 100% 97% 96%95% 94% 94% 94% 93% 93% 93% 93% 92% 92% 92% 91% 90% 90% 89% 89% 89% 88% 88% 86%
Food
Techn
ology
Geolog
y
Germ
an
Health
and
Soc
ialCar
e
Histor
y
Ancien
t Hist
ory
Dram
a
Art Pho
togr
aphy
Geogr
aphy
Gover
nmen
t and
Politic
s
Furth
er M
athe
mat
ics
Produ
ct Des
ign
Econo
mics
Mus
ic
Sport
(BTEC)
Chem
istry
Spanis
h
Perfo
rming
Arts
Busine
ss A
pplie
d
Dance
Physic
sIC
T
Englis
h Lit
erat
ure
Sociol
ogy
Med
ia Stu
dies0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Mea
n
Academic subjects (2 of 2)
86% 83% 83% 83% 82% 81% 81% 81% 79%76%
73%68%
64%59%
Mat
hem
atics
Biolog
y
Frenc
h
Physic
al Edu
catio
n
Englis
h La
ngua
ge
Psych
ology
Scienc
e
Religio
us S
tudie
s
Compu
ter S
cienc
e
Busine
ss
Englis
h La
ngua
gean
d...
Statis
tics
Englis
h GCSE R
esit Art
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Mea
n
Non-academic areas
98% 96%
94% 93% 93%90% 90% 89%
82% 82% 81% 81% 81% 79% 78% 76% 74%70%
67%
33%
Schoo
l sec
urity
Schoo
l disc
ipline
Schoo
l facil
ities
Exam
resu
lts
Caring
teac
hers
Choice
of s
ubjec
ts
Truan
cy co
ntro
l
Develo
ping
pote
ntial
Develo
ping
mor
al
value
s
Compu
ter a
cces
s
Comm
unity
spirit
Schoo
l
com
mun
icatio
n
Happin
ess o
f chil
d
Teach
ing q
uality
Leve
ls of
hom
ewor
k
Caree
rs a
dvice
Availa
bility
of
reso
urce
s
Contro
l of b
ullyin
g
Develo
ping
conf
idenc
e
Social
hea
lth
educ
ation
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Mea
n
Student survey report – Appendix
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 96 of 97
Additional questions
98% 96%
93% 91% 90% 89% 87% 87% 86% 83% 81% 81%
69%66%
47%
Libra
ry fa
cilitie
s
Trans
fer f
rom
prev
ious s
choo
l
Acces
s to
staff
Quality
of s
choo
l
man
agem
ent
Attitud
e of
non-
teac
hing.
..
Prom
oting
racia
l
harm
ony
Celebr
ating
and
rewar
ding.
..
Out o
f sch
ool
activ
ities a
nd...
Tailor
ing w
orklo
ad
to ch
ilds..
.
Schoo
l mea
ls
Handli
ng co
mpla
ints
Treat
ing a
ll
stude
nts f
airly
and.
..
Regula
r mar
king
ofwor
k
Encou
ragin
g an
d
liste
ning
to...
Encou
ragin
g loc
al
com
mun
ity...
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%M
ean
Student survey report
Copyright © 2017 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 97 of 97
A word on Quality AssuranceTo ensure our services have maximum input, our accredited facilitators have extensive experience at seniorleadership level in schools and are all experienced in working with schools on the use of data to inform schoolimprovement and review. In addition, our ISO 27001 accreditation means your data is safe with us.
For further details please visit our website www.gl-assessment.co.uk.