Solution of Faddeev Integral Equations in Configuration Space Walter Gloeckle, Ruhr Universitat...

Post on 29-Dec-2015

221 views 4 download

Tags:

Transcript of Solution of Faddeev Integral Equations in Configuration Space Walter Gloeckle, Ruhr Universitat...

Solution of Faddeev Integral Equationsin

Configuration Space

Walter Gloeckle, Ruhr Universitat BochumGeorge Rawitscher, University of Connecticut

Fb-18, Santos, Brazil, August 24, 2006

Work in Progress

physics/0512010;

AIM: Solve three-body problems for Atomic Physics

Method:

1.Use Faddeev Equations in Configuration space

2.Use only integral equations for the productpotential x Wave function, called T

3.Numerical discretization via theSpectral expansion in terms of Chebyshev Polynomials

12

3

x1y1

Two-BodyThree-Body

Tr Vr r

0

E; r, r r dr

T1 t1 2 3

t i V i V iG0t i, i 1,2,3

1 1 G0 T1 2 G0 T2 3 G0 T3

V V g0

T = Product of wave function times potentialt or t - matrix

x y| tE |xy 12 3

dq e iqy yx|Eq|x

Eq E q2

2Mi

Two-b T-matrix imbedded in three-b space Two-body

G0E 1E iH0

x y|G0|x y 12 3

dq e iqy yg0x,x ;Eq

Three-body free Green’s function

Two-body free Green’s function

1x1,y1 2x2,y2 3x3,y3

x y V ix i E ixi,yi

V ixi jx j ,yj kxk ,yk

1 1 G0 t1 2 3 2 G0 t2 3 1 3 G0 t3 1 2

T1 t1G0T2 T3

T2 t2 1 t2G0T3 T1

T3 t3 1 t3G0T1 T2

Differential Fad’v Eq.for the wave fctn.

Integral Fad’v Eqfor the wave fctn.

Integral Fad’v Eqfor the T - fctn.

Coupled Faddeev Eqs.

With 3b-Pot’l

T1 t1G0T2 T3 1 t1G0 V41 1 G0 T1 T2 T3

T2 t2 1 t2G0T3 T1 1 t2G0 V42 1 t2G0T3 T1

1 t2G0V42G0T1 T2 T3

T3 t3 1 t3G0T1 T2 1 t3G0 V43 1 t3G0T1 T2

1 t3G0V43G0T1 T2 T3

A big mess, that requires the two-body t-matrices ti

I = 1, 2, 3

FE; r sinkr;GE; r coskr or expikr

Two-b tau-matrix, one dimensionTwo variables

E; r, r Vr r r RE; r, r

RE; r, r Vr g0E; r, r Vr

Vr 0

g0E; r, r RE; r, r dr

g0r, r 1kFr Gr

R r i, r j A ir j Yir i B ir j Zir i, i j

R r i, r j Air j Yir i B ir j Zir i, i j

Spectral Integral Equation Method

1 2 i j

Partitions

Result: Obtain a Rank 2 separable expression

0 < r < 3000 a.u.

He-He binding energy via the S-IEM

Tol 103 a0 1 No.of Partitions No. of Meshpts

10 12 5.0817542 47 799

10 6 5.0817461 19 323

10 3 5.0776 13 221

Rawitscher and Koltracht, Eur. J. Phys. 27, 1179 (2006)

Computing time for MATLAB (sec) with S-IEM

2.8 GHz Intel computer,200 Partitions, 17 points per partitionS-IEM

sec

r 1/10

r, r 2

Next Steps: toy model

2. Ignore the three-body interaction, and solve for identical particles

x y| tE |xy 12 3

dq e iqy yx|Eq|x

Eq E q2

2Mi

1. Go to the configuration representation

1 P 1 1 1 G0t1P 1 1 1 G0T

T t1P 1 t1PG0T

3. Make a partial wave exp.; set all L= 0

Kx,y; x,y 2

0

dq q2j0qyj0qy0x,x; q

0x,x; q 0

dxx2 0x,x; qg0x,x; q

dx,y 2

2 433

0

dq q2j0qy

0

dyy2j0qy

0

dy y 2j0q0y

1

1dt r0x, | 43 y

23y |; qun0|

23y 4

3y |

1

2 Vx

1

1dt un0|

12x y| j0q0| 34 x 1

2y|

Tx,y dx,y

0

0

dxdyxy2 Kx,y ; x,y Tx,y

Tx,y 1

1dt T| 1

2x y |, | 3

4x 1

2y |

Ansatz:

Tx,y s,r 1nL asr Lsx Lry

Tx,y s,r 1nL asr Fsrx,y

Fsrx,y 1

1Ls| 12 x

y | Lr| 34 x 1

2y | dt

Basis Functions

He-He bound state

Chebyshev expansionof v * Psi for He-He bound state

3.5 < r < 40

s,r 1nL ast Lsx Lry dx,y s,t 1

nL asrK srx,y

K srx,y Kx,y ; x,y Fsrx,y dx dy.

Equations for the expansion coefficients

I Ma d

Msr;sr Lsx Lry K srx,y dx dy

Final Matrix eqs.

dsr Lsx Lry dx,y dx dy

Complexity Estimates

nx ny 200

nL 100n t 100;nP nq 50.

nI 10

# of coordinate points

# of basis functions

# of angles

# of partitions and q values

Additional computational factor

F srx 0

ymaxj0qyFsrx,ydy

nF ny nx nL2 nq nI 2 1011 FLOPs

Msr,sr

nM nL2 nL

2 nq nP 2.5 1011 FLOPs

#

#

Ingredients for the Toy Model matrix eq.

Solution of the matrix eq.

nL23 1012 FLOPs

1-2 Hours Fortran

on a 2 GHz PC

Summary and Conclusions

• Integral Faddeev Eqs. in Config. Space for T(x,y) = V x Psi, combined with the spectral method for solving integral equations;

• Greens function incorporate asymptotic boundary conditions;

• Toy model should take about one hour• The expected accuracy is more than

6 sign. figs.