Social Media Impact Evaluation

Post on 12-May-2015

1.764 views 1 download

Tags:

description

This presentation was created for a portion of a web conference on using social media for the Financial Security for All Community of Practice.

Transcript of Social Media Impact Evaluation

SOCIAL MEDIA IMPACT EVALUATION

Anne Mims Adrian

anne.adrian@extension.org

twitter.com/aafromaa

blog.anneadrian.com

Special thanks to:

Michael Lambur, eXtension Evaluation Specialist

SOCIAL MEDIA …

… is a means to an end.

Means: conversations and interactions.

End: connecting individuals with Extension resources.

SOCIAL MEDIA …

…. isn’t just about the numbers;

it’s more about perception, engagement, and emotions.

Identify your community (some call this audience)

KNOW YOUR GOALSIncrease social media presence

Increase visits to web site

Engage people where they are

Drive conversions

Learn something new

Become an authority among authorities

KNOW YOUR GOALS

Become a contributing part of a community

Strengthen personal / professional/ organization’s reputation

Strengthen personal / professional/ organization’s credibility

Co-create

(Kanter, 2010)

(Kanter, 2010)

APPROACHES TO ENGAGEMENTInvolvement: site visitors, time spent, pageviews, reach, frequency

Interaction: contributions to blogs, content creation, and uploads

Intimacy: consumer attitudes, perceptions, and feelings

Influence: likelihood consumers will recommend or advocate

Forrester Research (Villa, 2009)

APPROACHES TO ENGAGEMENTKind: positively or negatively engaged

Degree: involved—low to high

Papadakis (Kaushik, 2008)

APPROACHES TO ENGAGEMENTInvolvement and interaction/degree

Can be monitored with analytics (quantitative or “head” data)

Intimacy and influence/kind

Need to come directly from the consumer (qualitative or “heart” data)

MONITORING ENGAGEMENTInvolvement and interaction/degree

Google Analytics: unique visits, frequency of visits, recency of visits, depth of visit, length of visit, time spent on site

Twitter: following, followers, tweets, retweets

MONITORING ENGAGEMENTInvolvement and interaction/degree

Facebook: fans, profile data, wall postings, events

YouTube: views, ratings, links, audiences

MONITORING ENGAGEMENT

Intimacy and influence/kind

Comment analysis

Content analysis of the conversation

Evaluation questions asked in the conversation

Links to online surveys/polls

Monitoring Twitter

Klout http://klout.com

Twitalyzer http://twitalyzer.com/

Peer Index http://www.peerindex.net/

TweetEffect http://tweeteffect.com/

Bit.ly* http://bit.ly

*Bit.ly can be used with other media

Monitoring Twitter

Klout http://klout.com

Monitoring Twitter

Twitalyzer http://twitalyzer.com/

Monitoring Twitter

Peer Index http://www.peerindex.net/

Monitoring Twitter

TweetEffect http://tweeteffect.com/

Monitoring Links

Bit.ly

Monitoring Facebook

Facebook analytics

Google analytics

Number of page likes

Links followed

Comments quality

Discussion changes

Monitoring Facebook

Monitoring Facebook

Monitoring YouTube

What if….

each of the 320 members spent 15 minutes a day contributing and/or listening online, …

… then 80 hours a day would be given to online work by the members.

What if ...

each of 320 members followed and/or were followed by 50 people who cared about the topic and/or needed information (within context), …

… then 16,000 people could engage, learn, share, and contribute (within context).

Popularity vs. influence

Balance scale and being effective in niches and communities where differences can be made.

ARE WE ENGAGING FOR LEARNING?Engage a community of learners

Contribute and provide information.

Make sense of the context.

Solve problems.

Drive of performance.

ReferencesKanter, Beth. (2010). 9 ways nonprofits can excel using social media. http://www.bethkanter.org/socialmedia-nonprofits-excel/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+bethblog+%28Beth%27s+Blog%29

Kaushik, A. (2008). Measuring online engagement: What role does web analytics play? http://www.kaushik.net/avinash/2008/01

Lambur, Michael (2010). Markers for Success: Getting started with your CoP evaluation efforts, Report, December 14, 2010.

Villa, J. (2009). What does engagement really mean? http://www.mediapost.com/publications/index.cfm?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=111974&passFuseAction=PublicationsSearch.showSearchReslts&art_searched=jose%20villa&page_number=11

ResourcesCoP Evaluation Guide http://about.extension.org/wiki/Communities_of_Practice_Evaluation_Guide

Communicating Social Media Potential for CoPs http://bit.ly/CoPsocialmedia

CoP Social Media Activity 2010 http://about.extension.org/wiki/CoP_Social_Media_Activity_2010

Photo Credits

Emotion Perception By jurvetson Steve Jurvetson http://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson/4182789146/ Photo

Conversation By cliff1066™Cliff cliff1066™'s photostream (24,013) http://www.flickr.com/photos/nostri-imago/2866399803/

Community: University of Minnesota Master Gardeners, supplied by Karen Jeannette

Boys: University of Minnesota Master Gardeners, supplied by Karen Jeannette

Questions

Share any final comments, thoughts, resources.

Thank you for your participation.

Anne Mims Adrian

anne.adrian@extension.org

twitter.com/aafromaa

blog.anneadrian.com