Post on 16-Mar-2020
Organizational Performance Tracker
Simone Lampkin, MHA, CSSGB
Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare
Simone Lampkin
No Conflicts of Interest
About Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare
3
2017 Financial Statistics
Our promise is to improve every life we touch
Vision
Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare will be nationally recognized for excellence in
clinical quality, patient safety, and compassionate care to improve every life
we touch.
Methodist Le Bonheur is a great place to be…
2015 - 2018
Working very hard to provide exceptional care
What you measure is
what you get.
But how do you know you’re measuring the right things?
7
2005
9
2010
14
2012
8
2013
3
2014
Number of Quality Goals:
At just 3 quality goals, we were clearly leaving some gaps.
And there were other challenges of our measurement model
1) Setting incremental goals based on historical performance was a slow path to excellence. Our goal is top decile by 2020.
2) Certain measures, like Early Elective Deliveries, while important, engaged only 3% of physicians. What were the other 97% working to improve?
3) With goals set for incremental improvement, a 20% improvement could still be below average. Who wants to receive care from an ‘average’ hospital?
Simply put, our Balanced Scorecard model for quality was inconsistent with our vision of top decile in all clinical measures of excellence.
We needed a clearer pathway to reach our 2020 Vision
Steps taken align practice and vision:
Now all important patient safety measures have top performance goals: - Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia - Length of Stay & Readmission O:E - Patient Safety Indicators - Surgical Site & Central Line Infections - C-Section Rates & Early Elective Delivery - Emergency Department Cycle Times - Cardiovascular Metrics (PCI, Statins) - Neurology Metrics (Thrombolytic Therapy) - Failure to Intervene (Sepsis Mortality) - Hospital-Acquired: c. Difficile and MRSA - Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers
Then linked all measures to management incentives
Steps taken: Translate vision into benchmarked metrics
Step 2: Build a culture that expects excellence in ALL areas
Metrics are chunked by service line to ensure natural owners
Include all metrics that support the vision
While we published data on all of these metrics; the only benchmarking was from registries
18
Step 3: Identify national benchmarks for every metric
Public Reporting Sites
National Registries
Leapfrog Best Practices
Observed:Expected Ratios STS/ACC Registries
Our solution: Organizational Performance Tracker (OPT)
The OPT has 2 components: 1) Actual monthly and YTD performance results 2) Points awarded based on comparison to benchmarks
Weighting applied to direct appropriate focus
METRICS Patient harm measures more heavily weighted than process measures
FACILITY SCORE Service Lines are weighted based on strategic growth plans
SYSTEM SCORE Facilities are weighted based on annual revenue
Senior leaders can now very quickly assess performance
Composite Quality Score (2018 Goal = Score of 115)
< Threshold of 100 115 or > Between 100 - 114
Performance against benchmarks are easily viewed
Leaders can quickly see where improvements
are most needed
Dynamic graphing feature shows trends – and eliminated monthly production of > 1000 static charts
Concerns were voiced – with significant emotion
Improvements have been seen in dozens of metrics
34.4% Reduction in catheter-associated urinary tract infections
41.0% Reduction in Left Without Being Seen in the ED
56.0% Reduction in surgical site infections for colon surgery
57.0% Reduction in hospital-acquired MRSA
63.0% Reduction in clostridium difficile infections
74.6% Reduction in surgical site infections for abdominal hysterectomy
77.5% Reduction in ventilator-associated pneumonia
Sources: Infection Prevention surveillance data improvements since 2016; ED real-time ED statistics (2015 to 2017)
In summary, steps for implementation included:
Total transparency, full visibility at all levels, and clear ownership of each indicator were keys to our success. The OPT is interactively displayed on large wall monitors in C-Suites, nursing units, and even public hallways.
Impact of the Organizational Performance Tracker
38
Questions