Post on 07-Mar-2018
Transport
SESAR development and deployment Global Challenges to Improve Air Navigation Performance Asilomar Conference Grounds, Pacific Grove, CA 13 February 2015 Rolf TUCHHARDT European Commission, DG MOVE
Transport
SESAR – Technological pillar of the SES 3 interrelating phases
Pilot Common Project
Transport
The political long term vision
Enabling EU skies to handle 3 times
more traffic
Improving safety by a factor of 10
Reducing the environmental impact per flight by
10%
Cutting ATM cost per flight
by 50%
Transport
The SESAR Joint Undertaking – Public Private Partnership
European Commission EUROCONTROL
• EUR 2.1 bio • 15 other members • 13 associate partners = 110 companies in total • 20+ countries • 3000 people working on SESAR • 300+ projects
Transport
SESAR is organized along three main phases
SESAR Phases
2005 2010 2015 2020+
2005 2010 2015 2020+
Development
Deployment
Planning work
Development work
SESAR Joint Undertaking
Implementation
Current work
Definition
European ATM Master Plan
Transport
The central role of the ATM Master Plan • The most recent update of the ATM
Master Plan, approved in 2012, identifies the "Essential Operational Changes" that need to be implemented to lead to the full deployment of the new SESAR concept by 2030
• Contains: – Performance objectives (The Why) – Description and prioritization of technical
solutions (The What) – Deployment scenarios per stakeholders
(The Where and When) – Investment needs and performance gains
over time (The How Much) – Standardization and regulatory roadmap,
Risk Management Plan (The How)
To be updated in 2015
Transport
ICAO GANP, SESAR & NextGen • Same philosophy
– Need to improve ATM performance – Aim at the Global ATM Operational
Concept – Through deployment of a series of
step changes
• Mutual impact, Global Regional – From concept definition to
operations – For timely and useful standards – With all other national programmes
Transport
Performance targets in the Master Plan Baselines overall performance needs required at network level at a given point in time on the basis of traffic forecasts and business priorities; defines SESAR performance targets in four KPAs:
To be updated in 2015
Safety
Environment Cost Efficiency
Airspace Capacity
Runway Capacity
Transport
OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS SYSTEM PROTOTYPES VALIDATION ACTIVITIES & RESULTS
PERFORMANCE VALIDATION TARGETS CONCEPT & ARCHITECTURE OPERATIONAL & TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CASES STANDARDISATION & REGULATION PREP.
PERFORMANCE NEEDS OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS & ENABLERS HIGH LEVEL DEPLOYMENT & DEVELOPMENT TIMELINE
R&
D P
RO
JEC
TS
MAS
TER
PLA
N
PRO
GR
AMM
E
4D Trajectory
Traffic Synchronisation
Airport Integration
Airport Throughput
Network Management
Conflict Management & Automation
Transport
SESAR development – gate to gate
Transport
V-cycle system approach to development • SESAR primary projects carry out validation exercises to:
– validate the operational improvement against operational requirements – evaluate the benefit to be expected from the operational change
ATM Master Plan
Performance Driven CONOPS
& roadmap
Validation targets and KPIs
Performance Assessment
Validation Exercises
Business Case
Deployment Scenarios
Gap Analysis
Transport
SESAR validation targets: Basis for R&D performance • Validation activities are driven by Validation Targets for a set of selected
KPAs and development phases of the SESAR Concept Steps
Transport
Consolidated performance assessment • The final objective is to ensure that developed solutions appropriately
contribute to the achievement of the targets
Cost
Effi
cien
cy
Envi
ronm
ent
Safety: Qualitatively Assessed
Capa
city
Runway
DB (Deploymentbaseline) DB+STEP1 DB+STEP1
+STEP2DB+STEP1+
STEP2+STEP3Target -0,30% -2,80% -5,65% -8,50%Cycle 3 assessment -0,30% -1,45%
-9%-8%-7%-6%-5%-4%-3%-2%-1%0%
Tota
l EC
AC
Fue
l sav
ings
Target Cycle 3 assessment
DB(Deployment baseline)
DB+STEP1 DB+STEP1+STEP2
DB+STEP1+
STEP2+STEP3
Target 8,50% 30,40% 73,10% 175,00%Cycle 3 assessment 8,50% 24,22%
0%20%40%60%80%
100%120%140%160%180%200%
Incr
ease
in a
ircra
ft pe
r vol
ume
in c
urre
nt "a
t-lim
it"
airs
pace
EN
RO
UTE
Target Cycle 3 assessment
DB (Deploymentbaseline) DB+STEP1 DB+STEP1
+STEP2DB+STEP1+
STEP2+STEP3Target 2,40% 10,40% 15,40% 18,40%
Cycle 3assessment 2,40% 12,10%
0%2%4%6%8%
10%12%14%16%18%20%
Incr
ea
se in
ru
nw
ay
thro
ugh
pu
t (a
t B
est
in C
lass
Airp
ort
s)
Target Cycle 3 assessment
DB (Deploymentbaseline) DB+STEP1 DB+STEP1
+STEP2DB+STEP1+
STEP2+STEP3Target 8,50% 30,40% 73,10% 175,00%Cycle 3 assessment 8,50% 32,80%
0%20%40%60%80%
100%120%140%160%180%200%
Incr
ease
in a
ircra
ft pe
r vol
ume
in c
urre
nt "
at-li
mit"
ai
rspa
ce T
MA
Target
Cycle 3 assessment
DB (Deployment baseline) DB+STEP1 DB+STEP1
+STEP2DB+STEP1+
STEP2+STEP3Target 2.57% 17.97% 33.30% 68.57%
Cycle 3 assessment 2.57% 15.80%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
% A
TCO
Pro
duct
ivity
impr
ovem
ent
Target
Cycle 3 assessment
TMA En-route
Transport
Linking development to deployment • The ATM Master Plan is for the European Union the sole source of ATM
technology development and implementation • Common projects are the tools chosen to deploy those selected ATM
functionalities that will achieve the Master Plan’s Essential operational changes (Article 4.1 of Common projects IR (EU)No 409/2013)
• Common projects aim at deploying in a coordinated and timely manner technology this “essential technology” when it is:
– Mature – Bringing significant performance benefits at network level – Requiring coordination at European level
P1 P2 Pn …
Implementation projects
Common project ATM Master Plan Deployment programme Planning view Business view Project view
Transport
Pilot Common Project: first set of functionalities ready for deployment
• The PCP aims at coordinating and synchronizing the implementation of the most relevant ATM functionalities (AF) developed by SESAR.
• AF are logical groupings of essential operational / technical changes identified in the ATM Master Plan that imply an overall global positive CBA
• The Commission adopted on 27 June 2014 the Regulation (EU) 716/2014 , making binding the implementation of the six first AF: – AF # 1: Extended AMAN and PBN in high density TMAs – AF # 2: Airport Integration and Throughput Functionalities – AF # 3: Flexible Airspace Management and Free Route – AF # 4: Network Collaborative Management (Flow & NOP) – AF # 5: iSWIM: Ground-ground integration and aeronautical data
management and sharing – AF # 6: Initial Trajectory Information Sharing: air-ground integration
towards i4D with enhanced Flight Data Processing performances
Transport
Pilot Common Project: final impact assessment
Main influence factors for PCP
benefits
ANS Productivity
(+3,2%)*
Airspace Capacity
(+12,5% TMA, +8,7 En-Route)
Airport Capacity (+3,9%)
Delayed flights (-9,8%)
Delay length (-12,2%)
Fuel Burn (85,8 Kg/flight
-2,1%)
*Result of ATCO productivity gains of : 12%
Transport
Link between performance and charging scheme and SESAR
• Performance plans shall include a description of the investment, including that necessary to achieve the performance targets, detailing their relevance to the ATM Master Plan and the common projects
This description is submitted to Commission scrutiny
• User charges may be modulated to optimise the use of air navigation services, reduce the environmental impact of flying, reduce congestion and to accelerate the deployment of SESAR ATM capabilities.
Transport
Pilot common project - deployment
Transport
SESAR JU and SESAR Deployment Manager: two pillars, one project
Transport
SESAR Deployment Manager
Transport
Conclusions • The Single European Sky initiative aims at improving
ATM performance through a set of interrelated activities
• The ATM Master Plan is the roadmap towards technology deployment and has a structuring impact on both development and deployment activities now running in parallel
• Technology development and deployment are directly hooked to ATM Master Plan performance expectations and to the SES policy