Sergey Filippov ¹ , Tom áš Ryb á r ² , M ário Ziman² ¹ Moscow Institute of Physics and...

Post on 30-Dec-2015

33 views 1 download

Tags:

description

Local two-qubit channels: probability-based comparison of constituents and entanglement-annihilating behavior. Sergey Filippov ¹ , Tom áš Ryb á r ² , M ário Ziman² ¹ Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology ² Research Center for Quantum Information, Slovak Academy of Sciences. CEQIP’2011. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Sergey Filippov ¹ , Tom áš Ryb á r ² , M ário Ziman² ¹ Moscow Institute of Physics and...

Local two-qubit channels: probability-based comparison of constituents and entanglement-annihilating behavior

Sergey Filippov¹, Tomáš Rybár², Mário Ziman²

¹Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology

²Research Center for Quantum Information, Slovak Academy of Sciences

CEQIP’2011

CEQIP’2011

Content

Local channels Comparison Entanglement-annihilating

CEQIP’2011

Local channels

12

CEQIP’2011

Comparison

The aim is to distinguish between non-identical channels twin-identical channels

-distance between channels:

CEQIP’2011

Scheme

CEQIP’2011

Local two-qubit channels

Matrix representation for one channel

CEQIP’2011

Example 1

Input state is POVM has two effects, corresponding to

projectors on symm. and antisymm. subspaces The output mean value is

– Unitary channels ‘same’ ‘different’

-1

+1

– All channels ‘same’ ‘different’

CEQIP’2011

Example 2

Input state POVM has two effects, corresponding to

projectors on symm. and antisymm. subspaces The output mean value is

– All channels ‘same’ ‘different’

-1

+1

+0.25

0

Entanglement-annihilating

behaviour

CEQIP’2011

CEQIP’2011

What does EA mean?

is entanglement-annihilating if the output state is separable for all input states

is entanglement-breaking if the state is disentangled with respect to partitioning ‘1+2’|‘anc' for any input state and ancillary system.

CEQIP’2011

Properties

CEQIP’2011

Two depolarizing channels

Entanglement-breaking

CEQIP’2011

Two depolarizing channels

Entanglement-annihilating

CEQIP’2011

Two depolarizing channels

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

q1

q2

CEQIP’2011

Pauli channels

CEQIP’2011

Lemma

CEQIP’2011

Corollary 1

CEQIP’2011

How is Corollary 1 useful?

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

q1

q2

CEQIP’2011

Corollary 2

CEQIP’2011

CEQIP’2011

CEQIP’2011

Summary

We have considered– Probability-based comparison of qubit channels– Entanglement between qubits involved while

passing through a local channel Problems to investigate

– Upper-dimensional systems (qudits)– Continuous-variables– Multipartite systems

Hope you have had some fun

CEQIP’2011

Conclusion

Local channels ask many questions important for practical Quantum Information

Are participants similar to local channels?

Let us try answer them…

Thank you

for listening!