Post on 30-Sep-2020
San Diego Community College District Building and Design StandardsLance R. Lareau, District Architect
San Diego Community College District Building and Design Standards
Design Guidelines
Building Information Modeling Standards (BIM)
Green Building Policy & Procedures
AutoCad Standards
Universal Design Guidelines
Signage Standards
Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED)
All standards are located on the District Web-Site
Major Points for the Building Design Guidelines and Standards
Building must fit within existing context of the Campus
Spatially efficient buildings
Energy efficient buildings/ sustainability
User/Facilities Review
Standardization of systems that integrate into the Campus and District
Life-Cycle 50-100 years
Consensus on standard
Design Guidelines
Campus Neighborhoods
Materials
Scale
Campus edge; interaction with Community
Main Objectives
Facilitate a Collaborative Process
Coordinated project documents through modeling
Use the BIM Model as an information and Communication tool
Define modeling and analysis requirements
Enable the long term viability and usage of the BIM database
City’s current inventory (Fall 2010, exclusive of PE) includes;
3,099 assignable stations for lecture/classroom
2,372 assignable stations for laboratory
At the most minimum level of efficiency allowed by the State the student population is as follows;
Classroom; 5,159 seats at 66% occupancy = 2,045
2,045 seats x 53 minimum hours per week = 108385 min. required student contact hours (out of a total possible contact hours of 2,045 x 70hr = 143,150).
Labs; 2,372 seats at 85% occupancy = 2,016
2,016 seats x 27.5 minimum hours per week = 55,440 min. required student contact hours (out of a total possible contact hours of 2,016 x 70 = 141,120).
(Required student contact hours * 16.5)/525 = FTES
(143,150 + 55,440) *16.5/ 525 = 6,241 FTES
FTES x 3.33 = approx. student population per semester
6,241 x 3.33 = 20,783 students at min. occupancy standards
There were 13,256 students on campus F2010; City has scheduled classes
at an efficiency rate of 64% of the min. Title V requirements; or, 48% of the
available time is scheduled.
The proposed build-out for Prop. S-N will remove the following assignable stations via demolition or renovation;
1,841 Lecture/classroom
1,769 Laboratory
The proposed build-out for Prop. S-N will add the following assignable stations via construction of new buildings or renovation of existing buildings;
4,641 Lecture/Classroom
1,961 Laboratory
For the following net additional assignable stations;
1,814 Lecture/Classroom
1,053 Laboratory
For a proposed campus total of assignable stations;
6,973 Lecture/Classroom
3,615 Laboratory
The proposed Prop. S-N build-out as planned for Mesa
6,973 assignable stations for lecture/classroom
3,615 assignable stations for laboratory
At the most minimum level of efficiency allowed by the State the student population is as follows;
Classroom; 6,973 seats at 66% occupancy = 4,602
4,602 seats x 53 min. hours per week = 243,906 min. required student contact hours
Labs; 3,615 seats at 85% occupancy = 3,073
3,073 seats x 27.5 min. hours per week = 84,508
Required student contact hours / FTES
(243,906 + 84,508)*16.5 / 525 = 10,322 FTES
FTES x 3.2 = approx. student population per semester
10,322 x 3.2 = 33,030 students per semester
This will exceed the CEQA cap by over 8,000
Students if Mesa were to schedule classes at the
State required minimum.
At the current efficiency rate of 82%, the student
population on campus would be 27,085.
The Math/Science building is now 208,000 SF.
It will provide the following assignable stations;
1,188 assignable stations for lecture/classroom
702 assignable stations for laboratory
At the most minimum level of efficiency allowed by the State the student population is as follows;
Classroom; 1,188 seats at 66% occupancy = 784
784 seats x 53 min. hours per week = 41,552 min. required student contact hours
Labs; 702 seats at 85% occupancy = 597
597 seats x 27.5 min. hours per week = 16,418
Required student contact hours * 16.5 / 525 = FTES
(41,552 + 16,418)*16.5 / 525 = 1,822 FTES
FTES x 3.2 = approx. student population per semester
1,822 x 3.2 = 5,830 students per semester
User accessibility to design intend
The Instructional Technology Building is requested to be 42,657 SF
It is proposed to provide the following assignable stations;
744 assignable stations for lecture/classroom
504 assignable stations for laboratory
At the most minimum level of efficiency allowed by the State the student population is as follows;
Classroom; 744 seats at 66% occupancy = 491
491 seats x 53 min. hours per week = 26,023 min. required student contact hours
Labs; 504 seats at 85% occupancy = 428
428 seats x 27.5 min. hours per week = 11,770
(26,023 + 11,770)*16.5 / 525 = 1,188 FTES
FTES x 3.2 = approx. student population per semester
1,188 x 3.2 = 3,802 students per semester
The proposed Prop. S-N build-out as planned for Mesa will exceed the required cap by over 8,000 students at state minimum requirements and by over 2,000 students at Mesa’s current efficiency levels of 82% of the State requirements.
The Math/Science building will have 5,830 students at a min.
The Social and Behavioral Science Building is intended to have 5,955 students at a min.
The Instructional Technology Building is intended to have 3,802 students at a min.
If we build new buildings that are in conflict with the Title V guidelines; that is, if we spend tax $$ on new buildings with the intent of under-utilizing the facility below Title V criteria, it would be a violation of the State Regulations
We cannot exceed our CEQA cap without a complete revisit to all CEQA documents and Public review; Current CEQA documents state that Mesa would not exceed the 2005 level of a 25,000 students.
SDCCD Signage Standards for Buildings and Wayfinding
QUESTIONS?