Safe States Alliance Full-Member Webinar - c.ymcdn.com · Finkelstein EA, Corso PS, Miller TR,...

Post on 15-Feb-2019

218 views 0 download

Transcript of Safe States Alliance Full-Member Webinar - c.ymcdn.com · Finkelstein EA, Corso PS, Miller TR,...

Safe States Alliance Full-Member Webinar

February 18, 2015

Agenda

Welcome

State of the States

Evaluation Community of Practice

Workforce Development Efforts

Advocacy Updates

2015 Safe States Annual Meeting

Q&A

STATE OF THE STATES

Background

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Injuries and violence have a significant impact on the overall

health of Americans including:

• Premature death,

• Disability, and

• Burden placed on the health care system.

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Web-based Injury Statistics Query

and Reporting System (WISQARS) [online] (2012) [accessed 2014 Aug 4]. Available from URL: http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars.

2. Finkelstein EA, Corso PS, Miller TR, Associates. Incidence and Economic Burden of Injuries in the United States. New York: Oxford

University Press; 2006.

in Emergency Departments for injury1 Over 31.7 million

people treated

related to injury1 Over 2.3 million hospitalizations

related to injury— nearly 1 person every 3 minutes1

More than 180,000 deaths

on medical costs and lost productivity due to injuries2

$406 billion ultimately spent in a single year

Methodology

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

5th administration of the Safe States Alliance

State of the States (SOTS) Survey

Administered biennially since 2005

2013 SOTS was administered in early 2014

41 states participated

The results presented in this report were

analyzed using:

• SPSS Version 16.0,

• SAS Enterprise Guide 5.1, and

• ArcGIS 10.1.

Core Components

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Collect, analyze, and disseminate

injury and violence data

Select, implement, and

evaluate effective program

and policy strategies

Effectively communicate

information to key

stakeholders

Provide training

and technical

assistance

Build and sustain a solid

stable infrastructure

Engage partners for

collaboration

Core Components

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Collect, analyze, and disseminate

injury and violence data

Select, implement, and

evaluate effective program

and policy strategies

Effectively communicate

information to key

stakeholders

Provide training

and technical

assistance

Build and sustain a solid

stable infrastructure

Engage partners for

collaboration

Build a Solid Infrastructure

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure – Program Location

– Funding

– FTEs

– Centralized

IVP Program

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

BUILD A SOLID INFRASTRUCTURE FOR INJURY AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION INCLUDES…

Program Location

Funding

Full Time Equivalents (FTEs)

Centralized IVP Program

Program Location

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure – Program Location

– Funding

– FTEs

– Centralized

IVP Program

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Location of Injury and Violence Prevention Programs in

State Health Departments

60%

13% 13% 9%

2% 2%

59%

8% 12%

6% 2%

13%

50%

16% 12%

4% 2%

16%

57%

19%

6% 4%

2%

11%

55%

14% 10%

5% 5%

12%

Health Promotion/

Disease Prevention/ Community

Health/ Behavioral Health

Maternal Child Health/Family

Health

Emergency Medical Services

(EMS)

Epidemiology Environmental Health

Other

2005 (N=45) 2007 (N=50) 2009 (N=49) 2011 (N=47) 2013 (N=41)

Program Location

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure – Program Location

– Funding

– FTEs

– Centralized

IVP Program

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

States with an Identified

Injury and Violence Prevention

Program

77%

89% 90%

2009 (N=49) 2011 (N=47) 2013 (N=41)

71%

57% 59%

6% 32% 31%

2009 (N=49) 2011 (N=47) 2013 (N=41)

Primarily Responsible for IVP Activities

IVP Activities are Decentralized

Centralization of Injury and

Violence Prevention Activities

Funding

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure – Program Location

– Funding

– FTEs

– Centralized

IVP Program

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Number of States Reporting Spending Funding Sources

vs. Total Provided by Each Funding Source ($Millions) in FFY 2013

Funding

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure – Program Location

– Funding

– FTEs

– Centralized

IVP Program

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

State Health Department Injury and Violence Prevention

FFY 2013 Funding per Capita: State Funding per Capita Compared to National Funding per Capita ($0.45 per capita)

Full Time Equivalents (FTEs)

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure – Program Location

– Funding

– FTEs

– Centralized

IVP Program

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Distribution of FTE Primary Roles in

State Injury and Violence Prevention Programs, FFY 2013

Full Time Equivalents (FTEs)

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure – Program Location

– Funding

– FTEs

– Centralized

IVP Program

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Distribution of FTEs Working in

State Injury and Violence Prevention Programs, FFY 2013

2

15

8 9

5

1 1

Less than 1.00

1.00-5.00 5.01-10.00 10.01-15.00 15.01-20.00 20.01-25.00 25.01-30.00

Nu

mb

er o

f St

ate

IVP

Pro

gram

s

FTEs Working within State IVP Programs

Median = 7.50 FTEs

Average = 8.54 FTEs

Centralized IVP Programs

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure – Program Location

– Funding

– FTEs

– Centralized

IVP Program

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

• Four (4) states reported not having an identified IVP

program and IVP activities were decentralized

throughout their state.

• One (1) state not included in the survey response,

reported not have an IVP program in their state at all.

States Lacking a Centralized IVP Program

• Limited or no staff

• Internal bureaucracies in hiring new staff

• Lack of staff to compete for new funding

• Lack of funding to support existing infrastructures

• Competing divisions for same funding source

Barriers to Forming a Centralized IVP Program

Collect and Analyze Data

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance – Use of Core

Datasets

– Access to and Use

of IVP Data

– Access to Data

Professionals

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

COLLECT AND ANALYZE INJURY AND VIOLENCE DATA INCLUDES…

Use of Core Datasets

Access to and Use of Injury and Violence Data

Access to a Data Professional

Use of Core Datasets

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance – Use of Core

Datasets

– Access to and Use

of IVP Data

– Access to Data

Professionals

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Accessed

Dataset (N)

Used the Data N

(%)

Vital Records 39 39 (100%)

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 37 36 (97%)

Hospital Discharge Data (HDD) 37 37 (100%)

Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) 34 32 (94%)

Child Death Review (CDR) 28 26 (92%)

Emergency Department (ED) 26 26 (100%)

Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) 24 21 (87%)

Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 22 21 (95%)

Medical Examiner 22 20 (90%)

Uniform Crime Reporting System (UCR) 21 20 (95%)

National Occupant Protection Use Survey (NOPUS) 20 19 (95%)

Access to Core Datasets and

Use of Core Datasets for Programmatic Decisions

Use of Core Datasets

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance – Use of Core

Datasets

– Access to and Use

of IVP Data

– Access to Data

Professionals

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Accessed

Dataset (N)

Used the Data N

(%)

Vital Records 39 39 (100%)

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 37 36 (97%)

Hospital Discharge Data (HDD) 37 37 (100%)

Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) 34 32 (94%)

Child Death Review (CDR) 28 26 (92%)

Emergency Department (ED) 26 26 (100%)

Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) 24 21 (87%)

Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 22 21 (95%)

Medical Examiner 22 20 (90%)

Uniform Crime Reporting System (UCR) 21 20 (95%)

National Occupant Protection Use Survey (NOPUS) 20 19 (95%)

Access to Core Datasets and

Use of Core Datasets for Programmatic Decisions

Access to and Use of IVP Data

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance – Use of Core

Datasets

– Access to and Use

of IVP Data

– Access to Data

Professionals

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Top 5 Datasets Used to Identify Injury and Violence

Prevention Topics or Populations

90%

68%

95%

76% 86%

95%

76% 84% 76%

64% 56%

73%

51%

68% 79%

90%

27%

73%

26%

57%

Vital Records (N=39)

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance

System (BRFSS) (N=37)

Hospital Discharge Data (HDD) (N=37)

Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System

(YRBSS) (N=34)

Child Death Review (CDR) (N=28)

Identify topic-specific injury and violence issues

Identify specific population groups

Identify risk and/or protective factors

Identify geographic regions

Access to Data Professionals

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance – Use of Core

Datasets

– Access to and Use

of IVP Data

– Access to Data

Professionals

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Access to Data Professionals

56% 59%

41%

10% 9%

4%

20%

30%

51%

14% 2% 4%

2013 (N=41) 2011 (N=47) 2009 (N=49)

0% of the time

1 - 50% of the time

51 - 99% of the time

100% or more of the time (i.e., equivalent to one or more FTE)

Program & Policy Strategies

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance

• Program &

Policy Strategies – Areas of Program and

Policy Focus

– Implementation &

Evaluation Activities

– Methods to Inform

Policy

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

SELECT, IMPLEMENT, AND EVALUATE PROGRAMS AND POLICES INCLUDES…

Areas of Program and Policy Focus

Implementation & Evaluation Activities

Methods to Inform Policy

Areas of Program Focus

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies – Areas of Program and

Policy Focus

– Implementation &

Evaluation Activities

– Methods to Inform

Policy

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Top

Primary

Focus

Areas

2013 2011 2009 2007 2005

1 Motor vehicle

injury

Motor vehicle

injury

Motor vehicle

injury Suicide attempts Suicide attempts

2 Fall injury Fall injury Child passenger

safety

Child passenger

safety

Sexual

assault/rape

3

Poisoning/

Prescription Drug

Overdose

Sexual

assault/rape Fall injury

Motor vehicle

safety

Child passenger

safety

4 Sexual

assault/rape

Injuries to

children

Injuries to

children

Sexual

assault/rape

Traumatic brain

injury

5 Child passenger

safety

Child passenger

safety

Sexual

assault/rape

Injuries to

children

Injuries to

children

Primary Programmatic Focus Areas 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011, & 2013

Areas of Program Focus

Top

Primary

Focus

Areas

2013 2011 2009 2007 2005

1 Motor vehicle

injury

Motor vehicle

injury

Motor vehicle

injury Suicide attempts Suicide attempts

2 Fall injury Fall injury Child passenger

safety

Child passenger

safety

Sexual

assault/rape

3

Poisoning/

Prescription Drug

Overdose

Sexual

assault/rape Fall injury

Motor vehicle

safety

Child passenger

safety

4 Sexual

assault/rape

Injuries to

children

Injuries to

children

Sexual

assault/rape

Traumatic brain

injury

5 Child passenger

safety

Child passenger

safety

Sexual

assault/rape

Injuries to

children

Injuries to

children

Primary Programmatic Focus Areas 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011, & 2013

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies – Areas of Program and

Policy Focus

– Implementation &

Evaluation Activities

– Methods to Inform

Policy

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Areas of Program Focus

Top

Primary

Focus

Areas

2013 2011 2009 2007 2005

1 Motor vehicle

injury

Motor vehicle

injury

Motor vehicle

injury Suicide attempts Suicide attempts

2 Fall injury Fall injury Child passenger

safety

Child passenger

safety

Sexual

assault/rape

3

Poisoning/

Prescription Drug

Overdose

Sexual

assault/rape Fall injury

Motor vehicle

safety

Child passenger

safety

4 Sexual

assault/rape

Injuries to

children

Injuries to

children

Sexual

assault/rape

Traumatic brain

injury

5 Child passenger

safety

Child passenger

safety

Sexual

assault/rape

Injuries to

children

Injuries to

children

Primary Programmatic Focus Areas 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011, & 2013

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies – Areas of Program and

Policy Focus

– Implementation &

Evaluation Activities

– Methods to Inform

Policy

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Areas of Program Focus

Top

Primary

Focus

Areas

2013 2011 2009 2007 2005

1 Motor vehicle

injury

Motor vehicle

injury

Motor vehicle

injury Suicide attempts Suicide attempts

2 Fall injury Fall injury Child passenger

safety

Child passenger

safety

Sexual

assault/rape

3

Poisoning/

Prescription Drug

Overdose

Sexual

assault/rape Fall injury

Motor vehicle

safety

Child passenger

safety

4 Sexual

assault/rape

Injuries to

children

Injuries to

children

Sexual

assault/rape

Traumatic brain

injury

5 Child passenger

safety

Child passenger

safety

Sexual

assault/rape

Injuries to

children

Injuries to

children

Primary Programmatic Focus Areas 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011, & 2013

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies – Areas of Program and

Policy Focus

– Implementation &

Evaluation Activities

– Methods to Inform

Policy

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Areas of Program Focus

Motor Vehicle Injury Prevention

30 States identified Motor vehicle

injury prevention as a

primary focus area

76%

76%

74%

68%

68%

50%

50%

44%

24%

Child restraint/booster seat policy

Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) policy

Child safety seat distribution program

Distracted driving policies

Primary seat belt policy

Alcohol-impaired driving policies

Bicycle helmet policy

Motorcycle helmet policy

Complete Streets Policy

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies – Areas of Program and

Policy Focus

– Implementation &

Evaluation Activities

– Methods to Inform

Policy

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Areas of Program Focus

Fall Injury Prevention

27 States identified Fall injury

prevention as a primary

focus area

74%

59%

59%

26%

Exercise-based fall prevention programs

Multi-faceted fall prevention program

Policy that establishes commissions, coalitions, and programs for fall prevention

Home modification program

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies – Areas of Program and

Policy Focus

– Implementation &

Evaluation Activities

– Methods to Inform

Policy

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Areas of Program Focus

Poisoning and Prescription Drug Overdose Prevention

27 States identified Poisoning and

Prescription Drug

Overdose prevention as

a primary focus area

78%

52%

Prescription Drug Monitoring Program PDMP

Other prescription drugrelated policies

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies – Areas of Program and

Policy Focus

– Implementation &

Evaluation Activities

– Methods to Inform

Policy

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Implementing Policy Strategies

Policy Strategies Implemented by State Injury and

Violence Prevention Programs

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies – Areas of Program and

Policy Focus

– Implementation &

Evaluation Activities

– Methods to Inform

Policy

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

66%

66%

60%

49%

46%

43%

34%

31%

31%

29%

Motor vehicle injury

Poisoning/Prescription Drug Overdose

Child passenger safety

Fall injuries

Traumatic brain injury

Sexual assault/rape

Childhood injury

Domestic/intimate partner violence

Suicide/self-inflicted

Teen Dating Violence

Areas of Program Focus

Methods for Selecting IVP Topic Areas • Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies – Areas of Program and

Policy Focus

– Implementation &

Evaluation Activities

– Methods to Inform

Policy

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Implementation & Evaluation

Topic Areas with Funding Allocated to Support Evaluation • Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies – Areas of Program and

Policy Focus

– Implementation &

Evaluation Activities

– Methods to Inform

Policy

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

55%

45%

40%

40%

31%

24%

21%

19%

19%

14%

12%

12%

10%

7%

7%

7%

7%

5%

5%

5%

2%

Sexual assault/rape

Fall injuries

Motor vehicle injury

Poisoning/Prescription Drug Overdose

Suicide/self-inflicted

Child passenger safety

Suicide attempts

Child abuse/neglect

Traumatic brain injury

Teen Dating Violence

Spinal cord injury

Submersion injuries/drowning

Domestic/intimate partner violence

Fire and burns injury

Homicide

Occupational injury

Pedestrian injury

All Terrain Vehicle injury

Motorcycle/motorized scooter injury

School-based injury

Rural/agricultural injury

Methods to Inform Policy

2013 Methods Used by State Injury and Violence

Prevention Programs to Inform Public Policy and Change

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies – Areas of Program and

Policy Focus

– Implementation &

Evaluation Activities

– Methods to Inform

Policy

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Methods to Inform Policy

2013 Methods Used by State Injury and Violence

Prevention Programs to Inform Public Policy and Change

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies – Areas of Program and

Policy Focus

– Implementation &

Evaluation Activities

– Methods to Inform

Policy

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Increase use of method in comparison to 2011 Decrease use of method in comparison to 2011

Methods to Inform Policy

Mechanisms or Protocols for Communicating with Policy

Makers about Injury and Violence Prevention Issues 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011 and 2013

• Background

• Methodology

• Core Components

• Infrastructure

• Surveillance

• Program & Policy

Strategies – Areas of Program and

Policy Focus

– Implementation &

Evaluation Activities

– Methods to Inform

Policy

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

81% 82% 89%

74% 73%

2005 (N=45) 2007 (N=50) 2009 (N=49) 2011 (N=47) 2013 (N=40)

Engage Partnerships for Collaboration

Partnerships among different organization types: Agencies within the state health department (23 entities)

Other state agencies (16 entities)

Non-governmental organization (23 entities)

Federal Agencies (7 entities)

Description of the nature of the partnership: Sharing data;

Program planning;

Exchange of funding;

Collaborate on policy efforts;

Collaborate on evaluation activities;

Collaborate on communication activities; and

Training/technical assistance.

Overview of Partnerships • Background

• Methodology

• Infrastructure

• Data

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Partnerships & Collaboration

Top Injury and Violence Partnerships Across all Agency

Types by Strength

• Background

• Methodology

• Infrastructure

• Data

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

70% 78% 81% 88%

13% 6% 7%

7% 10% 6%

12% 5% 8% 9%

Highway Safety Safe Kids Coalitions Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Vital Statistics

Strong New and Developing Needs Improvement No Relationship

within health

department

federal

non-

government

state

government

Effectively Communicate Information

• Background

• Methodology

• Infrastructure

• Data

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

EFFECTIVELY COMMUNICATING INFORMATION TO KEY STAKEHOLDERS INCLUDES…

100% of the state IVP programs surveyed provided some form of communication to target populations, partners, local groups, or others engaged in injury and violence prevention in 2013.

However, when states were asked if their

IVP program had an “official”

communications plan, only four states

(9%) reported that such a plan existed.

Effectively Communicate Information

• Background

• Methodology

• Infrastructure

• Data

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Methods to Communicate

Injury and Violence-Related Information

88% 93%

48% 46%

72%

93% 93%

61%

38%

92% 87% 87%

75% 72%

Website Participation in professional

meetings

Reports, articles, presentations, data briefs, fact sheets

Listservs Interviews with local media

2009 2011 2013

Provide Technical Support & Training

• Background

• Methodology

• Infrastructure

• Data

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

– Topics for Technical

Assistance & Training

– Technical Assistance

Resources

PROVIDING TECHNICAL SUPPORT & TRAINING INCLUDES…

Topics for Technical Assistance & Training

Technical Assistance Resources Used by States

Provide Technical Support & Training

Topics for Technical Assistance and Training

Provided/Received by the State IVP Programs

• Background

• Methodology

• Infrastructure

• Data

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

– Topics for Technical

Assistance & Training

– Technical Assistance

Resources

83%

73%

54%

49%

46%

41%

12%

10%

76%

68%

32%

68%

71%

66%

27%

29%

Program strategies and interventions

Data collection, analysis, reporting, and quality improvement

Coalition building and collaboration

Policy and legislation

Evaluation methods and processes

Communication

Social determinants of health

Management and leadership strategies

IVP Provided TA on th Topic IVP Received TA on the Topic

Provide Technical Support & Training

Top Technical Assistance Resources Used 2011 and 2013

• Background

• Methodology

• Infrastructure

• Data

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

– Topics for Technical

Assistance & Training

– Technical Assistance

Resources

82%

80%

73%

63%

58%

51%

51%

87%

83%

72%

68%

64%

51%

47%

90%

90%

71%

74%

42%

55%

55%

Federal Agencies

Safe States Alliance

Resource Centers

Peer to Peer

Regional Networks

University/Academic Institutions

Injury Control Research Centers (ICRCs)

2013 2011 2009

Provide Technical Support & Training

Top Technical Assistance Resources Used 2011 and 2013

• Background

• Methodology

• Infrastructure

• Data

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

– Topics for Technical

Assistance & Training

– Technical Assistance

Resources

82%

80%

73%

63%

58%

51%

51%

87%

83%

72%

68%

64%

51%

47%

90%

90%

71%

74%

42%

55%

55%

Federal Agencies

Safe States Alliance

Resource Centers

Peer to Peer

Regional Networks

University/Academic Institutions

Injury Control Research Centers (ICRCs)

2013 2011 2009

Shenée Bryan Safe States Alliance

Shenee.Reid@SafeStates.org

Download full

2013 State of the States Report

www.safestates.org/sots

• Background

• Methodology

• Infrastructure

• Data

• Program & Policy

Strategies

• Partnerships

• Communication

• Training & Technical

Assistance

Evaluation “Community of Practice”

Safe States Full-Member Webinar

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

4:00 PM – 5:00 PM

Evaluation Community of Practice:

Overview

The Evaluation Community of Practice

is open to all members of the Safe States

Alliance and the American Public Health

Association (APHA), as well as

practitioners that are involved in

evaluations of injury and violence

prevention programs and policies.

Evaluation Community of Practice:

Purpose

Through this Community of Practice,

participants are able to exchange ideas,

information, resources, and experiences

related to the evaluation of injury and

violence prevention-related programs

and policies.

Evaluation Community of Practice:

Evaluation Forums

Evaluation Community of Practice:

How Can You Join?

If you are interested in being added to the

Community of Practice, please utilize the

following link:

http://www.safestates.org/event/EvalCoP

Registration to complete the registration

form and be added to the Community.

Upon the processing of your registration

form, you will receive directions for

accessing and logging into the community.

Any Questions?

Ina I. Allicott, MPH

Evaluation &Technical Assistance Coordinator

Safe States Alliance

ina.allicott@safestates.org

IVP Workforce Development Strategic Plan 2015-2019

PL

AN

• Form Steering Committee

• Met 9 times throughout 2014

• ID target audiences, framework, partners to engage

• IVP WFD working definition

DE

VE

LO

P

• Develop/implement IVP WFD survey - Role - Existing opps. - Challenges - Needs

• Environmental scan

• SWOT analysis

• Top 3 goals

• Draft plan

FIN

AL

E

• Steering Committee feedback (Oct)

• Partner feed-back (Nov/Dec)

• Updated plan (Dec)

• Safe States feedback, final plan (Jan)

PLAN DEVELOP FINALIZE

IMPLEMENT

IVP WFD Strategic Plan Overview

Executive Summary (1 page) Purpose, Collaboration, Actionable next steps, Goals

Detailed plan Introduction w/background

How to translate plan into action

Definitions: IVP & WFD

Goals & strategies + suggested next steps

Resources

Steering Committee members

IVP WFD Strategic Plan Goals & Strategies GOAL 1: Demand Increase the demand for IVP workforce development.

IVP WFD Strategic Plan Goals & Strategies GOAL 2: Supply Increase the number of cross-cutting, competency- and evidence-based IVP workforce development opportunities that are widely available at national, state, tribal, and local levels.

GOAL 3: Access Explore strategies for establishing a central clearinghouse (or multiple “hubs”) for cross-cutting, competency- and evidence-based IVP workforce development opportunities that are widely available at national, state, tribal, and local levels.

IVP WFD Strategic Plan Goals & Strategies GOAL 4: Quality Assure quality in the supply of new and/or existing IVP workforce development opportunities.

GOAL 5: Sustainability Leverage existing resources to support leveraged, revised and/or new IVP workforce development opportunities.

Partnerships and collaboration Central and necessary component to making progress in all areas of the strategic plan through the expansion of cross-cutting collaboration with existing and new prevention partners around IVP workforce development at national, state, tribal, and local levels.

IVP WFD Strategic Plan Implementation Develop/implement communication plan & products

Calls with IVP WFD Steering Committee in 2015

Share Strategic Plan with their organization/agency

ID current activities that align with plan

ID FY 2015 priorities that align with plan

ID & then collaboration on common 2015 goals/strategies/next steps

ID potential 2016 goals/strategies/next steps (for CDC application)

IVP WFD Strategic Plan Implementation Develop Safe States 2015 Implementation Plan

Develop a web-based clearinghouse for existing training opportunities related to Core Comps for IVP Professionals o Solicit proposals for web developer & map existing IVP & PH trainings

Increase availability of continuing education credits for existing Safe States trainings for professionals with designations as Certified Health Education Specialists (CHES) and Certified in Public Health (CPH) o Map trainings to CHES & CPH areas/domains; upload trainings to www.train.org

Relevant recommendations from recent WFD Report

Evaluation?

Government Relations/Advocacy Updates

New Position Statements

2015 Safe States Alliance Policy Agenda

Increase funding to CDC for the Core Violence and Injury Prevention Program (VIPP) by $13M

Support continued funding of $20M to CDC for Prescription Drug Overdose prevention

Increase funding for the CDC’s National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) to $25M to expand implementation nationwide.

Injury and Violence Prevention Network

AAA

Afterschool Alliance

American Academy of Pediatrics

American Association of Poison Control Centers

American College of Emergency Physicians

American College of Sports Medicine

American College of Preventive Medicine

American Foundation for Suicide Prevention

American Medical Association

American Occupational Therapy Association

American Physical Therapy Association

American Public Health Association

American Psychological Association

American Trauma Society

Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs

Association of State and Territorial Health Officials

Brain Injury Association of America

Brain Trauma Foundation

Break the Cycle

California Coalition Against Sexual Assault

Center of Excellence on Elder Abuse and Neglect

Child Injury Prevention Alliance

Children's Hospital Association

Children's Safety Network, Education Development Center

Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists

Directors of Health Promotion and Education

FIA Foundation

Futures Without Violence

Harm Reduction Coalition

Menswork

National Association of County and City Health Officials

National Alliance to End Sexual Violence

NAPHSIS

National Association of State EMS Officials

National Association of State Head Injury Administrators

National Association of Students Against Violence Everywhere

National Center on Domestic and Sexual Violence (NCDSV)

National Council on Aging

National Child Abuse Coalition

National Safety Council

National Sexual Violence Resource Center

National Network to End Domestic Violence

National Physicians Alliance

National Violence Prevention Network

Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape

Prevent Child Abuse America

Prevention Institute

Safe Kids Worldwide

Safe States Alliance

Society for Advancement of Violence and Injury Research

Society for Public Health Education

Suicide Prevention Resource Center

The Safety Institute

Trust for America's Health

YMCA of the USA

2015 Hill Day

March 16, 2015

Washington, D.C.

*Limited travel support still available to

attend

Office of Policy and Partnership

FY 2016 President’s Budget &

Updated NCIPC Focus Areas

Elizabeth Zurick Health Policy Team Lead

Office of Policy and Partnerships

National Center for Injury Prevention and Control

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Safe States Alliance All Member Call

February 18, 2015

National Center for Injury Prevention and Control

Agenda

Overview of the FY 2016 President’s Budget

Updated NCIPC Focus Areas

Q & A

FY 2016 President’s Budget – CDC Highlights

Total CDC- wide funding: $11 billion

Program level: $7 billion

Budget authority: $6 billion

Major initiatives:

Combatting Antibiotic Resistance (+$264.3M)

Prescription Drug Overdose Prevention (+53.6M)

Decreases:

public health scientific services, immunizations, chronic disease,

and occupational and environmental health.

FY 2016 President’s Budget - NCIPC

Total Funding: $256.9 million

Increase of $86.5 million over FY 2015 levels.

The proposed increase includes

$5 million for a new initiative to begin a national concussion

surveillance system to determine the incidence of sports-related

concussions.

Support to address the PDO epidemic and heroin-related

overdoes:

$48 million above FY 2015 levels to address PDO within

states.

$5.6 million to address the rising rate of heroin-related

overdose deaths.

The proposed increase includes (cont.):

Support for the Now is the Time Plan

$10 million for an initiative to support research into the

causes and prevention of gun violence.

$12 million above FY 2014 for NVDRS to expand the system

nationwide.

$5.6 million for Sexual Violence Prevention/RPE Evaluation

transferred to budget authority.

FY 2016 President’s Budget - NCIPC

Injury Prevention and Control 2015 2016 PB

-- Intentional Injury $ 92,001 $ 107,611

-- Unintentional Injury $8,598 $ 8,598

--Injury Prevention Activities $48,950 $107,602

-- Injury Control Research Centers $ 9,596 $ 9,596

-- NVDRS $ 11,302 $ 23,570

Total (in thousands) $170,447 $256,977

FY 2015 Appropriation vs. FY 2016 President’s Budget - NCIPC

Updated NCIPC Priorities

NCIPC Focus Areas

CDC and NCIPC priorities:

Prescription Drug Overdose

Motor Vehicle Injuries

Growth and Development over next two years:

Child abuse and neglect

Older adult falls

Sexual violence

Youth sports concussion

Questions?

Elizabeth Zurick

egf3@cdc.gov

404.384.8579

2015 Safe States Annual Meeting April 29 – May 1, 2015 at the Embassy Suites Centennial Park in Atlanta, Georgia

Early registration closes February 27, 2015

Now accepting nominations for Awards and Innovative Initiatives

http://www.safestates.org/?2015AnnualMeeting

Question & Answer