Analysis of the project

“Strengthening the production chain and AGROSILVES

pig's farmers organisation”

Villa El Salvador, Lima – Peru

Natalia Lozano natalia.lozanobroncales@uq.net.au May 15, 2014P

ictu

re: Luis

Chavarr

ia (

2009)

• Introduction

• Community’s profile

• Project’s profile

• Principles of CD involved in the project

• Suggestions to improve the project

• Conclusion

OUTLINE

Pic

ture

: Luis

Chavarr

ia (

2009)

Background

• Small-scale pig’s production is widespread in Lima’sshanty-towns.

• AGROSILVES is one of the biggest farmer’sorganizations in Villa El Salvador.

Objectives

• Analysing the project, by applying the acquiredknowledge on community’s development principles andengagement; to suggest possible improvement in theproject.

Methodology

• Review of project’s document

• Comparison with similar projects (Africa and Asia)

• Personal’s reflection on my position as an Extension Off.

INTRODUCTION

Source: http://www.voluntourism.org/news-studyandresearch73.htm

Table 01. Monthly incomes of AGROSILVES’ members

Monthly income Percentage

Up to AUD 257.64 (S/. 650.00) 43

Up to AUD 396.83 (S/. 1000) 25.5

Up to AUD 595.24 (S/. 1500) 25.5

More than AUD 595.24 (S/. 1500) 6

Table 02. Experience in hog’s production of AGROSILVES’ members

Rank Percentage

Up to 01 year 4

1 To 5 years 33

6-10 years 19.5

11-15 years 14

16-20 years 19.5

21- 25 years 6

26-30 years 2

30 -35 years 2

Total 100

THE

PROJECT

Technical practices on

pig’s husbandry

Negotiation’s skills and

market access

Access to financial

resources to invest on

basic, technical

infrastructure

Strengthening

AGROSILVES’

organization

Specific objectives

Increase the production, productivity

and profitability of AGROSILVES’

farmers, through market chain

approach

General objective

Contribute to improve quality of life

of AGROSILVES’ farmers

Goal

Pic

ture

: Luis

Chavarr

ia (

2009)

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT METHODS

SurveysPublic meetings

Strategic planning’s

workshopsFarmer Field

Schools (FFS)

Pic

ture

s: N

ata

lia L

ozano (

2009,

2011,

2012)

Community Groups

Research

Private

ASOPORCI (Industry association)

Government

NGOs

Consumers

SGRA –

MUNLIMA

(Regional)

Buyers (Middle-men)

Central MUNIVES

(Local)

DIGESA

SENASA

MINAGRI

Universities

AGROSILVES’ Small-scale pig -producers

UPCH UNMSM

UNALM

IPES

PRISMA

“Glass of Milk” Mother’s

Committee

Abattoir

Feed suppliers

Livestock agents

Veterinarians

“Community’s kitchen” Mother’s

Committee

“Wawa - Wasi” Mother’s

Committee

MAPPING OF AGROSILVES’ STAKEHOLDERS

Figure 06. Influence/interest map representing the ranking of influence and interest of

stakeholders on AGROSILVES’ small-scale pig production (Based on Hernandez- Jover et

al, 2012)

4 ASOPORCI IPES

MINAGRI

PRISMA

MUNLIMA

MUNIVES

3 COMMUNITY

GROUPS

VETERINARIAN

SENASA

2 UNALM

UPCH

UNMSM

ABBATOIR DIGESA

1 MIDDLE-MAN

1 2 3 4

Influence

GLASS OF MILK KIDS, YOUTH, ELDERLY PEOPLE

COMUNNITY

KITCHEN

AGROSILVES’ FAMILY’S

MOTHERS

WAWA WASI

Mothers of children under 07 years old organize this community- based program and daily prepare the meal

Women are in charge of taking take of their children (kids and teenagers)

as well as their parents

Women organized and managed this community-based program, providing

subsided meals for their families

Mothers of children under 03 years old support this community- based program with food from ‘Glass of

milk’ and ‘Community kitchen’

HYPOTHETICAL LINKS (WOMEN)

ASOPORCI (Industry association)

Consumers

SGRA –

MUNLIMA

(Regional)

Buyers (Middle-men)

MUNIVES

DIGESA

SENASA

MINAGRI

AGROSILVES’ Small-scale pig -producers

UPCH

UNMSM

UNALM IPES

PRISMA

“Glass of Milk” Mother’s

Committee

Abattoir

Feed suppliers

Livestock agents

Veterinarians

“Community’s kitchen” Mother’s

Committee

“Wawa - Wasi” Mother’s

Committee

5(10) + 13(20) + 10(30) = 610/21= 29

AGROSILVES’ COLLABORATION CHART

OUTCOMES

SUCESS

• Expanded citizen’s participation base

• Expanded leadership base

• Strengthened individual skills

• A strategic community agenda

PRINCIPLES OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

SUCESS

• A vehicle for people’s concerns

• Passion and enthusiasm of local people

• Inclusiveness

• Fostering leadership/entrepreneurship

• Recognition of people’s knowledge

• Diversity of opinions

• Celebration of success

• Activities fun and social

Cleofe Abanto

Felicita Cristobal

Juan M. Cerpanaupa

NEW

COMMUNITY’S

LEADERS

GUADALUPE

PANIHUARAA

TRANSFORMATIONAL

LEADER

How to improve the project?

1. Using the participatory approach:

Planning, monitoring and evaluation.

Re

al W

orl

d e

va

lua

tio

n :

wo

rkin

g u

nd

er

bu

dg

et,

tim

e, d

ata

, a

nd

po

liti

ca

l c

on

str

ain

ts /

Mic

ha

el B

am

be

rge

r, J

im R

ug

h,

Lin

da

Ma

bry

, S

AG

E,

20

12

How to improve the project?

2. Holistic approach

(Sustainability)

http://www.johnstons.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/sustainability_redigeret.jpg

3. Social capital

Social energy

Competency-based Economies through the Formation of

Enterprise (CEFE)

PERU: FARMER TO FARMER (FtF)

Practical Action’s Kamayoq School in

Sicuani, Cusco - Peru

De

La

To

rre

(2

00

8)

How to improve the project?

4. Strategic partnership

Public

sector

Private

sector

Universities

Women’s groups

THANK YOU

http://thepigidea.org/