Resource efficient bioenergy for BC

Post on 21-Jun-2015

106 views 0 download

Tags:

description

Fischer Tropsch Liquid Fuels from biomass including hybrid approaches using coal with CCS to gain economies of scale.

Transcript of Resource efficient bioenergy for BC

Resource Efficient

Application of Biofuels in

British Columbia

Part 1: Fischer-Tropsch

Drop-in Fuels

Thomas Cheney

Bioenergy is limited

BCs Bioenergy

Resources are

limited

Efficient utilization is

required

Using bioenergy right

The Right Fuel • Compatible with the infrastructure

• Cost effective

• Clean-burning

• Distribution

• Range

The Right Process • Energy Efficiency

• Cost effective

• Allows use of non-food

feedstock

• Scalable

Co-Benefits: Carbon Capture, improved soil

Why Resource Efficiency Matters

BC Biomass

resources are

limited

• Equivalent to 40% of

BC fossil fuel use

• Mountain Pine Bettle

fibre supply spike

• 300 PJ sustainable

potential

Not all biofuels are created equal

• Some biofuels produce far more fuel\hectare

than others

BC Energy Use

BC Energy Use breakdown

Biomass can meet 25-

30% of Provincial

energy demand

Sector PJ PJ

Transportation 404

Industry 362

Agriculture 18

Residential 136

Comm., Instit. & Public Admin 105

Power Generation 35

Total 1060

Biomass Capacity 250-300

An American Perspective

• Biomass is not a panacea

“If all biomass were used in CBTL-CCS systems

designed to maximize liquids output, 5.9 million

bbl/day transport fuels could be produced. ≈ U.S.

domestic crude oil production. ≈ ½ of U.S. oil

imports” This assumes that the process with driven

with coal with biomass providing the carbon atoms!

BC’s GHG

emision

Of total

Marine 3.96%

Off-Road 5.40%

Rail 0.72%

Air 2.52%

Passenger Vehicles 14.04%

Heavy Duty Vehicle 9.36%

BC Transportation

• 300 Petajoules of energy use

• Assuming conversion efficiency rate of 40%, 120 PJ of fuel

could be realized. This however leave very limited

bioenergy resources available for sectors other than

transportation fuel

Electric vs. Biofuel Vehicles

• Vast electric

supplies

• Limited Range

• Limited liquid fuel

supplies

• Long range with

simple refuelling

empr.gov.bc.ca

We need both

Apply the right

technology in the

right place

• Electricity should be seen as the dominant

prime mover in B.C

• Biofuels\ hydrogen for range extension

The “Algaeus” biofuel plug-in

How do we get biofuels?

• Thermochemical Pathway

o Fischer-Troposch

o Di-Methyl ether (DME) and Methanol

Green Gasoline

o Biomass Synthetic Natural Gas

o Hydrogen

• Biochemical Pathways

o Ethanol

o Others based on proprietary organisms (LanzaTech)

Thermochemical Fuel Cycles

• Gasification, Gas Cleaning, Chemical

Synthesis

One Option is FT-Biofuels

CHOREN Biofuels Plant in Germany

FT FUEL

• CO + H2 CH2 + H2O

• Used for coal since 1930s

Biomass-Based FTFuels

• Clean syngas is essential

• Entrianed flow gasifiers are considered

to be the most mature technology

• Biomass feeding is a challenge

• Similar technologies used in Coal to

Liquids

FT Advantages

• 40% efficiency

• Drop-in fuel!

• Established for coal

and gas to liquids

• Biomass specific

technology pre-

commercial

Coal to Liquids Plant in South Africa

http://s2.hubimg.com/u/5090925_f260.jpg

FT Compared to the Cellulosic

ethanol

<2.5 units of biomass are required per unit of

fuel.

http://mitei.mit.edu/system/files/kreutz-fischer-tropsch.pdf

Economics of FT b

Competitive with oil at $115 per barrel gasoline withoug

carbon price

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/pdfs/liquid_trans_tech.pdf

Biomass injection

Particular challenges to BtL

o Use of coal based systems have energy use

challenges

biomass grinding to 100 um uses 8% of energy

in biomass

o Coal-based systems use a lock hopper

o Biomass based systems using screw injection

leads to greater energy efficiency Less pressurisation needed

Less dilution

Piston Feeding of Biomass

• Biomass specific feeding system appear best

rather than the systems adapted for coal. o Greater efficiency

o Van der Drift et al. 2004 covers these issues in detail o “ENTRAINED FLOW GASIFICATION OF BIOMASS: Ash behaviour, feeding issues, and system analyses”

Van der Drift Syngas Preparation

Preliminary gasification (option D) offers highest

efficiency approach.

Choren

• Low temperature gasification followed by high-

temperature gasification to clean gas.

• Pre-treatment low-temperature gasification to resolve

challenges with biomass gasification of woody biomass

Solar Assisted Fuels

• Uses solar energy to drive

endothermic reaction for

biofuels.

• Hydrogen created from

solar energy avoiding loss

of carbon through reverse

gas shift

Hertwich, E. G. and Zhang, X (2010) “Concentrating-Solar biomass gasification process for

a 3rd generation biofuel

Solar fuels

• Solar cogeneration for electrolysis and

gasification heat to increase process carbon

efficiency

Cost Analysis for solar fuel

analysis

• 7.5$ per GJ of fuel produced (2001 $)

Input costs $2.5 per GJ

• 60% Less land total

• 67% less land for biofuels

• Assumes a $100 /tC

Indicators Solar-

Biomass Fuel

Bomass Coal

Fuel Productivity

(kg fuel/100 kg resource)

121.0 39.9 62.2

Cost ($2001/GJ) $7.5 $8.9 $10.8

Efficiency 60.9% 42.0% 36.5%

Coal Biomass FT Fuels

• Coal with carbon capture

and storage can leverage

the biomass

1.5 units of coal + 1 unit biomass = 1

unit fuel + 1.5 units sequestered

CO2

565 liters gasoline equivalent with

coal +CCS versus 25l lge!

http://mitei.mit.edu/system/files/kreutz-fischer-tropsch.pdf

Remember This:

• Coal with CCS allows for low- mitigation cost

very low CO2 fuels

Carbon-Neutral Coal Based biofuel

• 38% biomass +

CCS leads to

carbon neutral

biofuel.

• Coal cheaper than

biomass, reduces

fuel production

costs even with

CCS costs included http://mitei.mit.edu/system/files/kreutz-fischer-tropsch.pdf

canindia.com

Economics

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/pdfs/liquid_trans_tech.pdf

CBTL with CCS costs less than BTL without CCS!

Conclusions

• Look at combining biomass and coal or

biomass with solar to maximize carbon

utilization

• Ethanol is a distraction!

• Electrify has much as possible

• Next SNG fuels using compressed

biomethane and liquified biomethane

THANK YOU!

://puregreencars.com/files/SunDiesel-Choren.jpg