Resistivity Logs.ppt

Post on 23-Oct-2015

398 views 15 download

Transcript of Resistivity Logs.ppt

1 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Resistivity Logging

2 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Resistivity LogResistivity Log

• Basics about the Resistivity:

• Resistivity measures the electric properties of the formation,• Resistivity is measured as, R in W per m,• Resistivity is the inverse of conductivity,• The ability to conduct electric current depends upon:

• The Volume of water, • The Temperature of the formation,• The Salinity of the formation

The Resistivity Log: Resistivity logs measure the ability of rocks toconduct electrical current and are scaled in units of ohm-meters.The Usage: Resistivity logs are electric logs which are used to:

Determine Hydrocarbon versus Water-bearing zones, Indicate Permeable zones, Determine Resisitivity Porosity.

3 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Resistivity

• Resistivity is the opposition to flow of electrical current offered by a material of unit length and unit cross sectional area. It is a property of the material itself, not of its shape or dimensions.

Unit length, L

Current, I

Voltage, V

Unit area, A

4 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Resistance and Resistivity

• Ohms Law: V = I R

• Resistance, R = r (L / A)

• Therefore V = I r (L / A)

• So r = (V / I) (A / L)

• Let k = A / L (Geometric Factor)

• So, r = (V / I) k

5 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Conductance and Conductivity

• Conductance is the reciprocal of resistance. It represents the ease with which current flows through a given circuit.

• Conductivity is the reciprocal of resistivity. It represents the ease with which current flows through a certain material. It is a property of the material itself.

• Resistance unit: ohm (Ω)• Resistivity unit: ohm-meter (Ω·m2/m, or Ω ·m)• Conductance unit : siemens or mho • Conductivity unit: siemens/meter or mho/meter.

6 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Resistivity Logging

There are two types of resistivity logging tools:

• Laterolog tools send a current from electrodes on the logging tool, through the formation, to a return electrode located either at surface or downhole.– Laterolog tools need a conductive path between the logging tool

and the formation

• Induction tools generate current loops in the formation and measure the strength of the electromagnetic signal created by these current loops. – Induction tools do not require a conductive path in the borehole.

They work in oil-base muds and air-filled holes.

7 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Basic Resistivity tool types

Induction Logging ToolsLaterolog Logging Tools

8 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

RxoRt

Rm

Rm

Rxo

Rt

Logging ToolBorehole

Uninvaded Zone

Invaded Zone

Laterolog vs. Induction Current Path

Laterolog Response

Induction Response

9 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Resistivity

There are two main techniques for measuring resistivity:

Laterolog : Current is injected into the formation

Induction : Current loops are induced in the formation

10 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

LatrologsPEx-HALS

11 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Resistivity : Laterolog

Current is forced through the mud into the formation

12 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Dual Laterolog Measurement

LLD: deep measurement, currect returns to surface.

LLS: shallow measurement, current returns to the tool itself.

13 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Bucking Current

Measure Current

A2

A1

M2

M1

A0

280 HzCurrentSource

MonitoringLoop

Resistivity : Laterolog Shallow (LLS)

14 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Bucking Current

Measure Current

A2

A1

M2

M1

A0

A1*

35 Hz Aux Mon.

Loop

MonitoringLoop

Bucking Current

FishLCM Module

35 Hz Current

Resistivity : Laterolog Deep (LLD)

15 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Resistivity : Laterolog invasion effects

RLL = Vm Rm + Vmc Rmc + Vxo Rxo + (1-Vm-Vmc-Vxo) Rt

16 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Resistivity : Laterolog

17 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Resistivity : Laterolog invasion effects

Rmc

Rm

RXO

Rt

Ra = VRm(Rm) + VRmc(Rmc) + Vrxo(Rxo) + VRt(Rt)

18 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

If Rmf < Rw then Rxo < LLS < LLD < RtIf Rmf > Rw then Rxo > LLS > LLD > Rt

Using Rxo, LLS & LLD, Rt and Di can be computed

Resistivity : Laterolog invasion effects

19 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Resistivity : Laterolog invasion effects

20 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Resistivity : Laterolog azimuthal measurements

21 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

LatrologsEnvironmental corrections

22 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Groningen Effect

• Caused by highly resistive beds overlying the formation that is being measured.

• This forces the deep current into the mud column.

• This is caused by the voltage reference (cable-torpedo) becoming non-zero.

• LLd reads too high• More pronounced at low resistivity

23 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Borehole & Invasion Effects

Ra = Vm*Rm + Vxo*Rxo + Vt*Rt

Resistivities measured in series

24 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Invasion Enhances Shoulder Effects

25 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Shoulder-Bed Squeeze Effects

Deep measurement reads too high and results in erroneous invasion

profile.

All resistivities read lower than Rt and separation is reduced.

26 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Platform Express HRL FMI

LatrologsHRLA (High Resolution Array Laterolog)

27 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

HRLA Solutions Hardware

Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3

Mode 4 Mode 5

Multiple depth of investigation• Clear indication of invasion• Improved vertical resolution• No need for deep mode or bridle• No Groningen or drillpipe-

conveyed logging effects and reduced shoulder-bed effect

28 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

29 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

HRLA 1D Real-time Answer

Real-time wellsite product gives clear answers for quick decisions:

- Eliminates voltage reference effects

- Less shoulder-bed effect

- Self consistent depth matched measurements

30 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Answer Benefits: Reduced Shoulder-bed Effect

HRLA tool HALS tool 1D-Rt comparison

1D radial model

(invasion)thick-bed

approximation

31 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Answer Benefits: No Groningen Effect

Curve separation suggests

invasion but is due to

Groningen effect

HRLA resistivities clearly show zone is not invaded

32 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Answer Benefits: Thin-Bed and Invasion Profiling

Curve separationshows invasion

High verticalresolution

Curve separation results from Groningen effect

Groningen effectin indicator curve

HRLA tool DLL tool

33 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

HALS - standard and hires

SHALE

SAND

34 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

HALS LQC

Groningen flag

35 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

LQC - Out of limits (example)

HIGH RESISTIVITY BED

36 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

HALS - out of limits

HIGH RESISTIVITY BED

37 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

HALS NoisePrimarily from Rig Generator

Rig Generator OFF Rig Generator ON

38 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

InductionsAIT

39 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

AIT-H Stand-Off Positioning

40 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Resistivity : Induction

41 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Resistivity : Induction

42 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Operating Range

• 0.1 to 2000 ohmm• Moderate Rxo < Rt• Rt/Rm <100 (with hole diameter

considered)• Large diameter holes with moderate Rt/Rm

and moderate Rt

43 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Induction response errors

• Skin effect & Mutual Inductance• Borehole effect• Cave effect• Shoulder effect• Invasion effects

44 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Rmc

Rm

RXO

Rt

Resistivity : Induction

1/Ra = 1/(VRm(Rm)) + 1/(VRmc(Rmc)) + 1/(Vrxo(Rxo)) + 1/(VRt(Rt))

45 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

If Rmf < Rw, AT10 < 20 < 30 < 60 < 90If Rmf > Rw, AT10 > 20 > 30 > 60 > 90

From the 5 curves Rt can be computed

Resistivity : Induction

46 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Resistivity : InductionFocusing

47 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Resistivity : InductionHole size and shapeUncertainty in hole size or mud resistivity can cause large errors on the shallow curves but much smaller errors on the deeper measurements

Out of sequence

48 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Resistivity : InductionInvasion

Very deep invasion can affect even the deepest measurements, non-cylindrical invasion may affect the Rt computation

49 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Induction Resistivity in Deviated Wells

Relative dip angle

Shallow Resistivity Deep Resistivity

low relativedip angle

high relativedip angle

50 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Inductions vs Laterologs

51 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

Comparison to AIT

BS = 8”

Rt = 200

Rxo = 30

Rm = 0.1

S/O = 1.5”

52 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

BS=8.5Rm=0.5Rxo=5.0Rt=200

Resistivity : Tool planner

53 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

BS=12Rm=0.5Rxo=5.0Rt=200

Resistivity : Tool planner

54 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

BS=12Rm=1Rxo=5.0Rt=200

Resistivity : Tool planner

55 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

BS=16Rm=1Rxo=5.0Rt=200

Resistivity : Tool planner

56 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

BS=24Rm=1Rxo=5.0Rt=200

Resistivity : Tool planner

57 FE – OverviewFarag July 2002

BS=24Rm=1Rxo=5.0Rt=100

Resistivity : Tool planner