Post on 19-Feb-2018
RABINTHRANATH TAGORE AND SYMBOLISM: A STUDY
Dissertation Submitted to
Periyar EVR College (Autonomous), Tiruchi – 23
(Affiliated to Bharathidasan University)
in partial fulfillment of the requirements
for the award of the Degree of
Master of Philosophy in English
Submitted by
V. KAMALAKANNAN
Reg.No. 11MFEL01
Under the Guidance of
Prof. A. WILLIAMS JOHN BOSCO M.A., M.Phil.
Associate Professor
PG & Research Department of English
PERIYAR EVR COLLEGE (AUTONOMOUS)
TIRUCHI - 23.
December 2012
V. Kamalakannan
Reg.No. 11MFEL01
PG & Research Department of English
Periyar EVR College (Autonomous)
Tiruchi - 23.
Declaration
I, V. Kamalakannan (Reg.No.11MFEL01), hereby declare that the
Dissertation entitled Rabinthranath Tagore and Symbolism: A Study
submitted to the Department of English, Periyar E.V.R. College, Tiruchi – 23
affiliated to Bharathidasan University is my original work and the
Dissertation has not formed the basis for the award of any degree, diploma,
associate ship, fellowship or similar other titles. It has not been submitted to any
other University or Institution for the award of any degree or diploma.
Signature of the Candidate
Place: Tiruchirappalli
Date:
Prof. A. Williams John Bosco M.A., M.Phil.,
Associate Professor of English
Periyar E.V.R. College (Autonomous)
Tiruchirappalli-620 023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date:
Certificate
This is to certify that the project work entitled “Rabinthranath Tagore
and Symbolism: A Study of His Select Plays” submitted by
V.Kamalakannan (Reg. No. 11MFEL01) in Partial fulfillment of the
requirements of the Master of Philosophy in English Literature course of
Periyar E.V.R. College (Autonomous), Tiruchirappalli-23, for the academic
period 2011-2012 in the subject English is the original work of the Candidate.
Signature of the Candidate Signature of the Guide
Signature of the Head of the Department
Acknowledgement
I wish to record my deep sense of gratitude to my lovable guide Prof. A.
William John Bosco M.A., M.Phil., Associate Professor, PG & Research
Department of English, Periyar EVR College (Autonomous), Tiruchi – 23
who meticulously steered this research work. I am thankful to him for sparing
his time for guiding me.
It is a privilege to acknowledge my sincere thanks to the Head of the
Department of English Dr. A. Padmavathy, M.A., M.Phil., Ph.D., and other
faculty members for their counseling and co-operation.
I express my deep sense of gratitude to Dr. T. Jayakumar, M.A.,
M.Phil., B.Ed., Ph.D., Associate Professor Department of English for giving
me the required books for thesis writing.
My thanks are due to my Friends and Classmates members for their
encouragement and kind co-operation during the preparation of my thesis. I
would like to thank Subashree Computer Centre, Trichy-20 for executing the
typing work with perfection.
Place: Tiruchirappalli
Date:
(V. Kamalakannan)
Contents
Chapters Title Page No.
I Introduction 1
II Symbolism in Chitra 14
III Symbolism in The Post Office 33
IV Symbolism in Tagore’s Chandalika 48
V Conclusion 56
Works Cited 68
Chapter I
Introduction
English language is used as a link language between the natives and the foreigners.
K.R. Srinivasa Iyengar has commented that an Indian writing in English was rather like an
animal imitating the footprints of another. According to Naik, Indian English literature was
not a “Hesperian Hybrid nurtured in a Hindustani hot house” (158). It was rather a slender
twig of that Banyan tree termed Indian Literature, ancient and multi-faceted.
Indian English literature has shown “spring timer fervor” and has attained “autumnal
ripeness‟ (Preface VII) in the recent years. Although Hirankumar Sanyal has pointed out that
drama is „a literature that walks and talks‟ (233), it was just a plant of meager growth in the
house of Indian English Literature, but it has been advancing, rather limping during the last
four decades. It was almost a non-entity and it could not be matched with other genres in this
literature like fiction and poetry.
There were several factors responsible for this stunned growth of drama and the
foremost problem was the indissoluble relation between drama and the theatre. Drama, a
mimetic representation of life is a composite art in which the written word attains artistic
realization when spoken by the actor on the stage and reciprocated by the audience. A play in
order to communicate fully must become a live dramatic experience and so it needs real
theatre and alive audience. According to Naik, a true dramatist has to “communicate or he
will die” (181). It was precisely the lack of these essentials that had hamstrung Indian drama
in English all along.
One silver lining was that in the recent Indian drama in English language had „fared
sumptuously and put on flesh‟ (155). Drama was the fifth Veda for the ancient Hindus and
Indian classical drama which flourished for ten centuries or more could now safely challenge
comparison with other genres in Indian writhing.
Drama in Indian writing has had and glorious tradition. The contemporary dramatist
Girish Karnad has said in The Fire and the Rain that “Brahma, the Lord of all creations
extracted the requisite element from the four Vedas‟ (Prologue 2). He culled out the text from
Rig Veda, songs from Sama Veda, the art of acting from the Yajur Veda and Rasa (aesthetic
experience) from the Atharvana Veda and combined them into a fifth Veda “Natya Veda”
and thus gave birth to the art of drama. He then handed it over to his son, Lord Indra, the
supreme God of Gods. But Indra, Lord of Gods realized that Gods were unfit to the new form
and passed it on to the human preceptor Bharata who organizes a troupe with his hundred
sons and twenty-five Apsaras. Narada and others were engaged as musicians. Gods and
demons became the spectators; Nandhi and anukrati were the commentators.
The first open air performance was held on the occasion of Banner festival, Indra-
dhvaja festival, to celebrate Indra‟s victory in a battle over demons which is symbolic of the
conflict between Gods and demons in the heave, good doer and evil doer on the earth. Indra
Nath Choudhuri has pointed out that
Bharata in his Natyashastra explained that theatre is a playing (Kridaniyakam)
– a kind of diversion from day-to-day drudgery of life. So it involves the
conventions of the representational world (Lokadharmita). (173).
It was highlighted that the audience were not watching real life, but only a theatre.
Traditional Indian theatre through the presentational form created the reality of the theatric
universe on the stage. The primary aim of drama was not only to entertain but also to arouse a
personal response in the mind of the spectator. Saryug Yadav affirms that “. . .all emotions
including grief, terror and disgust are depicted; the Sanskrit drama never allows a tragic
catastrophe to cause a painful impression on the minds of the audience (3-4).
Classical Sanskrit theatre, ritual theatre and folk theatre comprise the traditional
Indian theatre. Classical Sanskrit theatre drew support from the works such as Natyashastra,
Abinaya Darpana and Sangitha Rathakara; ritual theatre portrayed a wide range of casts and
communities, while folk theatre was secular in spirit.
Sanskrit literature is classified into Drishya (that can be seen or exhibited) and the
Sravya (that can be heard or recited). Drama falls under the former category. Drama in
Sanskrit literature belongs to the „Umberalla of Rupaka‟ which means depiction of life in its
various aspects represented in form by actions assumed by various characters. The Rupaka
has ten classifications and the prominent component is Nataka.
Sanskrit drama develops around there primary constituents, namely Vaster (plot),
Neta (hero) and Rava (sentiment). Each play consist of a prologue introduce by an invocation
and a formal ushering in of the plot. This is followed by the theme presented in equally
divided parts of five or ten acts. Every act is conclused by the exist of all the characters and
the stage is left empty. The incidents like journey, killings and wars are never enacted but are
only suggested. The surviving Sanskrit dramas are numerous and vary from short one act
play to very long plays. The exponent dramatists were Asvaghose, Bhasa, Kalidasa,
Bhavabhuti and Sudra.
There are various kinds of dramatic presentation. Edward cites the concept of drama
as defined by Bharata. As he observes drama has to deal with „the imitation of things done in
former times by Gods, and men, by Kings and the great ones of the world‟ (88), and this was
followed by the ancient playwrights and theorists. The dramatist draws on the subject matter
from the epics and puranas. The actor is aware that he is enacting a drama, and it is the stage
presentation which distinguishes drama from premoderns western drama. The classical Indian
drama is episodic and narrative is structure and it does not build up a climax as Aristotelian
drama does.
Indian English drama saw the first light of the day when Krishna Mohan Banerjee
wrote The Persecuted in 1931. It is however, pertinent to note that the real journey of Indian
English drama begins with Michael Madhusudan Dutt‟s Is this called Civilization? Published
in 1981.
In the Pre-independence phase, the major playwrights were Sri Aurobindo,
Rabindranath Tagore, Kailasam, Harindranatha Chattopadhya and Bharati Sarabai. Among
them Sri Aurobindo and Rabindranath Tagore, the two great divine poets, were the first
Indian dramatists to become prominent in Indian English Literature.
Sri Aurobindo, a born „Lord of language‟ was an outstanding writer in Indian English
Literature. He wrote five complete blank verse plays besides his six incomplete plays. His
incomplete verse play are Perseus the Deliverer (1943), Rodogune (1958), The Viziers of
Bassora (1957), Eric (1960), and Vasavadutta (1957). The implied theme of Perseus the
Deliverer is the evolution of man from the state of ignorance of that of enlightened
humanism. The play also presents the dramatist‟s vision of an ideal world where man will be
broadminded and kind in sprit which may lead him to perfection, so as to become one with
God. The purification of the human soul through suffering is the theme of Rodogune.
According to Aurobindo, suffering in the hands of the divine will is and instrument
for perfecting the soul of mankind. In The Viziers of Bassora, the playwright reveals a bright
future for mankind and the ultimate victory of the forces of good over the force of evil.
Through this play, the dramatist visualizes the higher possibilities. In this new society lies the
dramatist‟s vision of man‟s aspirations for establishing an ideal world in this mundane earth.
Sinha sums up the theme of the play Eric as „the trinity of glorious manhood can be
completed only when strength in nature and wisdom in the mind are combined with the love
in the heart. „(202).
Love becomes the evolving force in Eric, and the vision that is portrayed by the
dramatist is the vision of a blissful state not only for individuals like Eric, but for all those
who experience the magic charm of love. If an individual is guided by his instincts, he will
attain peace and perfection. This concept has formed the basis and theme of his play
Vasavadutta.
The plays of Aurobindo deal with the concept of love as its basis since love has
become the greatest solvent of most forms of evil. Apart from all these, his incomplete plays
are The Witch of Elni, Achab and Esarhaddon, The Maid in the Mill, The House of Brut, The
birth of Sin and Prince of Edur. The length of these plays varies from one scene of fifty two
lined to three acts.
The most striking features of Sri Aurobindo‟s plays is that portray different culture
and countries in different epochs with a variety of characters, moods and sentiments. As cited
by Prema Nandakumar, K.R. Srinivasa Iyengar observes that Aurobindo‟s plays deal with the
„drama‟s of life and love, of conflict and change‟ (33). This is true as Perseus the Deliver is
grounded on the ancient Greek myth of Perseus Vasavadutta is a romantic tale of ancient
India.
The fable is from Somadeva‟s Kathasaritsagara and Sri Aurobindo has also followed
Bhasa‟s Pratiyana Yavugandharvana in planning his dramatic action. Rodogune is the only
tragedy attempted by Sri Aurobindo, and the source was Corneille‟s famous tragedy,
Rodogune. In this tragedy, the alliance between poetry and tragedy is as ancient as
Aeschylus. The dramatic romance Eric, the King of Norway, leads us to ancient Norway as
the dramatist has taken his fable from the lives of Old Norwegian sages. Through this play,
the dramatist has glorified the supremacy of love as it overcomes bitterness and murderous
revenge.
All the characters in Aurobindo‟s plays realize the value of love which is the „hoop of
god‟s, hearts combine‟ (Prema Nandakumar 36). The play Viziers of Bassora is mainly based
on the „Tale of the Beautiful Sweet Friend‟ a delightful story by Shahrazed to king Sharayar
during the thirty-second night in the Arabian night Entertainments. The drama has a fairy-tale
ending eighth Haroun-AI-Rahsed, the legendary Caliph, setting matters tight. But whether the
theme is ancient, medieval or modern, Sri Aurobindo weaves adroitly plots and characters
and use language to a high creative purpose. Hence the dramatic world of Sri Aurobindo is a
world of heroism and romance, of tears an smiles, of insights and epiphanies. There is almost
a global coverage in the total content of Sri Aurobindo‟s dramatic literature and the method
adopted by Aurobindo is to pick up only brief outline and relevant points out of the different
sources so as to build up a unified and harmonious new structure that bears the stamp of his
personality. Aurobindo through his imaginative skill has transformed the temporal materials
into rich varied art forms.
With respect to plot construction and characterization, Aurobindo‟s indebtedness to
Elizabethan drama is undeniable. He has followed the footpath of Shakespeare by not
adhering to the three unities of drama. The use of English blank verse was flawless in his
plays. He was also motivated by the impact of Sanskrit playwrights. As a part of dramatic
design, this multi-faced genius strove to present the exposition form exposition to the rise of
crises is smooth, natural and logical. The dramatic has employed the principle of contrast,
juxtaposition and suspense as chief structural forcese. In order to expose the inner recessed of
the mind, the playwright effectively used soliloquy in Vasavandutta and in Perseus the
deliverer, and asides in The Witch of Elni and Eric, the king of Norway.
The study of drama is half-literary and half-sociological because drama comedy
strictly in contact with the people, literate as well as illiterate, through stage production.
Though Aurobindo was a supreme artist, dramatic companies never staged his plays, because
he has failed to evolve a language quite appropriate to the dramatic medium. Though this
penetrating literary critic is known for his felicitous use of blank, his lengthy speech
suppressed the action of his plays. Aurobindo‟s emphasis on the general principles of
dramatic design is definitely a paramount achievement in the field of Indian English drama
but it is a regrettable fact that he could not cater to the demands of the stage.
Rabindranath Tagore, the epitome of Indian spiritual heritage, was a pioneer in the
Indian dramatic scenario. Many cities have crowned him as the father of Indian stagecraft. He
saved his fellowmen fruitfully and characteristically by assuming the roles of an interpreter
and mediator between the civilizations of the east and the west. Tagore combined the Indian
and western traditions to bring a synthesis between the east and the west.
He has written abundantly and his plays encompass all the known categories- five act
plays based on the Elizabethan models. One act plays, poignant tragedies and rollicking
comedies, chards, farces, satires, dramatic dialogue in verse, lyrical dramas, symbolical plays
and plays predominating in metaphysical and contemporary problems. He has written more
than forty plays of all kinds using myths, legends, symbols and allegory in large proportion to
express his views on love, religion and death. He wrote primarily in Bengali but he himself
has translated almost all his plays into English. The protagonists in his plays realize the value
of compassion and self-sacrifice. In all his plays, the heroes strive hard to relieve the
sufferings of humanity from the clutches of the material world. His major plays are
impregnated with the spirit of Buddhism and through his characters he has crystallized the
meaning and substance of the play.
Rabindranath Tagore, son of Maharishi Devendranath Tagore was born on 6th
may
1861. The story of his early life has been vividly pictured by him in his Reminiscences. He
writes somewhat critically and disapprovingly of his early life, even through he did not have
much to complain of. His real education observes Edward Thompson, „came from the
circumstances of his life and from his environment‟ (119). He lived in a palatial house in a
crowded locality of Calcutta where he could witness, the bustling activities of the common
people around him. His experiences with the external world motivated him to write his first
long poem, The Poet’s Story which was published in his brother‟s Bengali magazine called
the Bharati.
Tagore was so captivated by the dramatic genre, that he began his career as a
dramatist in the early twenties; he composed the Opera, Valmiki-Prathiba and a full pledged
drama Rudra-Chanda and Malini in verse form. But his first full blooded drama, Raja-O-
Rani was published when he was twenty and the theme of his play is that of love and
patriotism.
His important plays are Sanyasi or Ascetic (1884), Nalini (1884), Mayarkhela or The
Play of Illusions (1888), Raja-O-Rani or The King and the Queen (1990), Visarajan or
Sacrifice (1890), Chitra (1894), Gandhari’s prayer (1897), Karna and Kunti (1897),
Bhashikaran or Captivation (1901), Vyangakautuk or Fun and Mockery (1907), Hasyautuk
or Fun and Laughter (1909), Malini (1896), Raja or The King of the Dark Chamber (1910),
Dakghar or The Post Office (1912), Mukta-Dhara (1922), Red Oleanders (1925), Natir Puja
(1926), Seshvarshan (1926), Natraj (1927), Chandalika (1933) and The Way of Deliverance
(1938), The plays are firmly rooted in the Indian ethos in theory character and treatment.
The plays of Rabindranath Tagore may roughly be classified into two classed as non-
symbolic dramas such as Sacrifice and The King and the Queen and symbolic dramas such as
The post Office, The Cycle of Spring, Red O’Leanders, King of the Dark Chamber, Chitra
and Chandalika Rabindranath Tagore‟s four symbolist dramas, The Cycle of Spring and Red
O’Leanders are pre dominantly allegorical while the other two- The Post Office and King of
the Dark Chamber belong to the genre of the symbolic drama proper.
Prof. K.R. Srinivasa Iyengar aptly comments on the nature of Tagore‟s dramas as
follows:
When Tagore applied his mind to a current problem- social, political,
economic – the head agreed with the heart; and the heart in its turn, beat in
response to abiding intuitions, not the restrictive formulas of creed, caste or
custom. The light of the soul‟s illumination led him, not to the will-o-wisp of
agonizing dialectics. Whatever may be the problem Tagore leapt from the
circumference to the center and seized it in terms of universality. The Poet
sees clear than others, further than others (26).
Tagore‟s plays are plays of symbols than of characters and incidents. Most of the
characters are shadowy featureless. They are important only is so far as they stand for an idea
or a feeling. They symbolically express a philosophy. „ It is not the logic of careful plotting,
but the music of ideas and symbols which is the soul of this drama‟ ( K.R.S Iyenger 26).
Even the titles of plays and names of characters are symbolic.
The images employed by Tagore not only appeal to our eye, ear and heart they also
touch the soul. On the other hand, a symbol expresses two levels of meaning. Primarily
symbolic words refer to something which suggests a different range of reference beyond
itself. Secondly a symbol works through association of suggestion.
The Plays Chitra, The Post Office and Chandalika are highly symbolic. In these plays
the unfolding of character and action is carried out through many symbols. The play
Chandalika is the shortest but it is the most powerful play. It is poetic drama. Imagery and
symbols play a vital role and all the conflict tales place in the theatre of the soul. The
Buddhist monk Ananda awakens self-awareness and self respect in Prakriti by saying “Give
me water” (I.148) and accepting it in his cupped hands. Prakriti is transformed. The simple
words “Give me water” acquire an incantatory effect and run through the fabric of the play as
a silver thread. They symbolize her “awakening” and freedom from bondage. When Prakriti
says “My birth is washed clean” (I. 149) and “the new birth” she refers to is “self-
knowledge”.
In Chandalika, Prakriti stands for nature and her mother for earth-a symbol of
patience, suffering and understanding. The primal spell may be taken as the “force of
attraction” in nature particularly of sex. Ananda stands for spirit, the awakening and bliss.
Even the word „Chandals‟ is made to represent people with „mean spirits‟. The union of
Ganga and Jamuna is the union of the white and the dark, of spirit and nature, of Ananda and
Prakriti.
Rabindranath Tagore‟s Chitra is a dramatic sermon on the theme of true love. This
lyrical drama, written in 1913, the year when Tagore received the Nobel Prize, is based on
the story of The Mahabharata. Chitra is the first clear exposition of feminism in India by
Tagore. According to Rangan “…. This play is a work of supreme art, a dream of flawless
beauty in and awakened state” (15). Tagore‟s concept human love finds a beautiful
expression in Chitra.
Chitra is a lyrical drama of passionate love based on a puranic theme. Chitra, the
princess of Manipur, brought up as a warrior feels for the first time that she is a woman when
Arjuna in his ascetic robes glances at her. She becomes conscious of the fact that she is not
beautiful enough to win the heart of Arjuna. She vainly woos Arjuna but is rejected by him
on grounds of his vow of celibacy. She does not give up her love. She is no the kind of
woman who nourishes her despair in lonely silence. Chitra finds that it is the labor of lifetime
to make one‟s true self fully known and honored. Therefore she chooses the easy path of
illusion which is the first step to reality that is the acquired splendor of beauty bestowed upon
her by the Gods Madana and Vasanta. This is the phase where Chitra fascinates and wins the
heart of Arjuna. Thus loves is consummated in the union of Chitra and Arjuna.
In Chitra, the central symbol is the offer of beauty to beauty to Chitra by the Gods,
Madana and Vasanta for a span of a year. The mot remarkable thing is that there is no
obvious exhibition of this symbols which grows naturally and spontaneously out of the story
that it is not noticed as a symbol in the beginning at all.
The success of symbolism in The Post Office could be similarly attributed to the fat
that it is to a great extent subordinate to naturalism. Secondly, the contexts in which the
symbols contribute to their success: in this play, the recognizable world of day-to-day life and
the objects or phenomena belonging to real life are transformed into symbols through poetry.
Tagroe‟s plays as opined by Dr. Krishnanand Joshi and Dr. B. Shymala Rao “are not
plays of action but plays of feeling, plays of carnival delight and eternal identity” (79). They
attempt to synthesize the rhythmic intensity of western tragedy with the mingling of Indian
folk and classical drama. None of his plays are to be viewed objectively as a representation of
a series of events. It is intended to produce an aesthetic and emotional experience. He was
faithful to dramatic tradition and to the moral and spiritual values. He regarded drama or
theatre only as a medium of self expression. No doubt, his plays are seldom meant for
arousing dramatic effect on the stage, but so far as the symbolic significance is concerned
they are splendid and beyond description.
As the dramatist has skillfully made use of various symbols, the present researcher
has proposed to make a study of the selected plays of Tagore (Chitra, The Post Office and
Chandalika) from this angle. A study from this point of view will help mankind to understand
the inner significance of the plays of the Tagore. This study has been divided into five
chapters including this introductory Chapter. Chapter II, III and IV are devoted to an analysis
of symbolism in Chitra, The Post Office, and Chandalika respectively. In Chapter V, an
attempt is made to sum up the findings of this dissertation.
Chapter II
Symbolism in “Chitra”
„Symbolism‟ is the practice of representing things by symbols. The letters of the
alphabet are symbols, the numerals are symbols, and science as it advances to discover
intricate laws begins to rely increasingly on the use of symbols. A symbol works through
association or suggestion. “Cross” is associated with Jesus and His suffering; “white” is
associated with purity and “dove” with peace and “hawk” with cruelty and war. Hence they
suggest these different things in the proper context. Symbols are of two types-Conventional
or Public, and Private or personal. A symbol is an integral part of a context, whereas an
image can exist without a context. An image has only one meaning, whereas a symbol is an
irreplaceable literary device.
Each and every writer is prone to use symbols. As Gordan Craig points out
“Symbolism is at the root not only of art but also o fife” (35). Like “image”, symbols appear
in widely different contexts. It appears as a term in logic, in mathematics, in semantics and
semiotics and epistemology; it has also had a long history in the worlds of theology, liturgy,
the fine arts and poetry. The shared element in all these current uses is probably „something
that stands for and represents or denotes something else”. (Madhusudana Rao 35)
Although we are using symbols in every moment of our lives, most of us are not
aware of it. The symbol becomes important on its own account and we forget that it stands
for or represents something else. In literary theory it seems desirable that the word should be
used as an object which refers to another object. Gordon Craig further points out “Not only
do poets and painter constantly use symbols but music becomes intelligible only through the
employment of them.” (35)
The word „symbolism‟ came from the Greek “Symballein” meaning „to throw
together‟. The serious use of symbols in works represents or suggests ideas and thoughts. The
term „symbolism‟ sometimes refers to the later part of the 19th
century in France and the
symbolists rebelled against to the literary Realism. They have the idea that writers should
create subjective symbols to convey personal and intense emotional experience.
The symbolists are of the view that the symbols alone will produce the real essence in
the hearts of the readers while reading a literary work. They are more subjective in using
symbols. Though the movement has its roots in France, it has its impact and influence beyond
French borders and the 20th
century European and American writers like T.S. Eliot,
W.B.Yeats and Hemingway owe debt to symbolism.
It is the duty of the poet and the dramatist to make readers and spectators aware of the
hidden significance behind external symbols. Of all forms of art, drama is particularly
adapted to symbolist treatment because it make use of visible action; the actors and he stage
forts represent person and places in a play and them the artist‟s sense of values.
The symbols employed by an artist are definite and concrete, but they are made
suggestive by indirect hints. Sen Gupta observes “… there is a difference between a beautiful
woman‟s features and the general impression of loveliness projected by them” (Madhusdana
Rao 30). This impression o loveliness is projected by the features but it is extrinsic to them.
In a symbolic work we find that there are two planes of meaning: the surface meaning
which is directly expressed and the over-arching meaning which is indirectly suggested. The
surface meaning becomes incomplete unless it leads to the overhanging meaning must spring
spontaneously out of the surface meaning.
What merits our attention much in Chitra is Tagore‟s deep and profound use o
symbolism suffused with music rhythm. As a matter of fact, however rich one‟s philosophy
may be, it has a very little significance in the realm of are and literature unless it is woven
into fabric of art. A true art calls for a unified sensibility‟ – that is feeling and thinking
together. It must have both poetic truth and poetic beauty. Sometimes, it so happens that an
artist presents his vision of live beautifully that the feeling it self becomes a form. This is
exactly what we notice in most of the works of Tagore especially on Chitra.
Tagore‟s plays are basically expressions of the soul‟s quest for beauty and truth. A
close study of his play reveals that Tagore probed deep into the mind of women and
presented a wide range of female characters. He drew the attention of his readers to the
prevailing social injustice especially to women. Besides this, he placed before the whole
world the world the ideal of self-reliance in Indian women fighting not only their own rights
and desires but also for those of the subjugated nationality and downtrodden humanity. By
his well–known play Chitra he has presented a very sensible and revolutionary picture of a
common woman.
Chitra is a dramatic sermon on the theme of true love. This lyrical drama, written in
1913, the year when Tagore received the Nobel Prize is based on the story of The
Mahabharata. Chitra is the first clear exposition of feminism in India by Tagore this play is a
work of supreme art, a dream of flawless beauty in an awakened state. Tagore‟s concept of
human love finds a beautiful expression in Chitra.
Tagore being an inheritor of the great literary tradition of Bengal, regarded women as
the primordial energy of the universe. Tagore‟s heroines can be classified into two broad
categories, the type of feminine charm and the type of feminine grace, serene in her self-
assurance and radiating a tranquil charm and possessing silent power over the human
characters display remarkable vivacity and dazzling variety. They are not abstract entities, but
creations of flesh and blood, pulsating, with convincing liveliness.
In his works women appear as mother, daughter, wife, beloved, and woman
symbolizes the Jivatma who seeks union with the Parmaatma. There are also mythical,
historical, religious, social, realistic and romantic characters, placed in his dramas, short
stories and novels. He represents them as facing typical Indian problems and he explores
deep into their hearts, with his keen psychological insight. His women characters are dynamic
and are not the products of mere artistic manipulation.
Tagore‟s heroines are both feminine and masculine. They belong to the earth but they
undergo tremendous changes in their encounter with harsh reality. Sometimes the two types-
the emotional and the tranquilizing get fused as in Chitra. The diverse types of his women are
basically human. They are enthroned as queens of the house, full of self-respect and self-
confidence, exhibiting various moods.
Chitra is based on The Mahabharata legend of Chitranganda and Arjuna. The play is
punctuated into nine well balanced Scenes: four Scenes are dedicated to portraying the
atmosphere of Chitra‟s meetings with the Gods (Madana, the God of Love, and Vasanta, the
god of Seasons); alternating with each one of these four Scenes is the development of the
theme-there are four scenes to convey the other atmosphere, in which we see the hero,
Arjuna, and the heroine, Chitra, together; and the final scene is the Climax.
Arjuna came to Manipur during the course of his wanderings to fulfill a vow of
penance. He saw Chitranganda, the beautiful daughter of Chitravahana, the king of the
country and was captivated by her charming beauty. He then asked the king for the hand of
his daughter in marriage. The king asked him to reveal his identity. On learning that he was
Arjuna, the Pandava prince, the King told him that one of his ancestors in the kingly line,
named Prabhanjana, was childless for a quite a long time. In order to obtain a successor, he
performed severe penance. Lord Shiva, pleased with his austerities, granted him a boon that
he and his successors would each have one child. It so happened that the promised child had
invariably been a son.
But Chitravahana was an exception, as he was the first to have only a daughter to
continue his race whom he named as Chitranganda. He, therefore, treated her always as a son
and had also made her as his successor. Chitra, the princess of Manipur, brought up as a
warrior feels for the first time that she is a woman when Arjuna in his ascetic robes glances at
her. She becomes conscious of the fact that she was not beautiful enough to win the heart of
Arjuna. She vainly woos Arjuna but it is rejected by him on grounds of his vow of celibacy.
She does not give up her love. She is not the kind of woman who nourishes her despair in
lonely silence. Chitra finds that it is the labor of lifetime to make one‟s true self fully known
and honored. Therefore she chooses the easy path of illusion which is the first step of reality
– that is she acquires splendorous beauty bestowed upon her by the Gods Madana and
Vasanta. This is the phase where Chitra fascinates and wins the heart of Arjuna. Thus love is
consummated in the union of Chitra and Arjuna.
Krishna Kripalani comments as follows: „Chitra is doubtless the most fascinating and
the most satisfying of Tagore‟s Plays‟ (139). It is “his loveliest drama, a lyrical feast, it is
beautiful, touching . . . there is clarity of vision and maturity of art. „ (Edward Thompson
125)
Chitra is not a play of feeling, but a play of carnival delight and external identity. The
central theme of the play is love. The drama evolves around the fullness of love which is
shared by man and woman equally. The play is marked by a subtle interplay of mood within
mood. It is a genuine symbolic play, yielding more meaning at every successive reading. The
world of Chitra is the world of mythology and tradition. It is a drama of youth, a drama of
growth.
Tagore represents the symbolism of human psyche, of youth and growth in Chitra. He
refers to the symbols-the organic world of flowers, fruits, plants and creatures. There are also
the symbols of metaphysical passion of „illusion and reality‟. Again he has also stated the
symbols of mythological consciousness of Madana and Vananta and the beloved elves. The
whole point of the play is that itself is a sudden spring time miracle, for it comes as it were
suddenly and fades away suddenly and unaccountably.
In Chitra the central symbol is the offering of beauty by the Gods Madana and
Vasanta for a span of a year. What is most remarkable is that there is no obvious exhibition of
this symbol, which grows so naturally and spontaneously out of the story that it is not notices
as a symbol in the beginning at all. Chitra who is brought up as a son falls in love with
Arjuna who sends her away saying „I have the vow of celibacy, I am not fit for thy husband‟
(2.33). So, she seeks the helps of the Gods-Madana and Vasanta to whom she says:
Had I the time needed, I could win his heart by slow degrees and ask no help
of the Gods. But it is the labor of lifetime to make one‟s true self fully known
and honored (2.35).
Her strong desire prompts her to cry impatiently for instant satisfaction. She requests
the Goddesses as follows: „For a single day make me superbly beautiful . . .give me but one
brief day of perfect beauty‟ (2.35). Her prayer is granted but with a significant difference
Vasanta says „Not for a span of a day, but for one whole year the charm of spring blossoms
shall nestle round thy limbs.‟ (2.36).
Commenting on the significance of symbolism Chitra, Ketki observes as follows:
The play begins and moves the action in a poetic-realistic mode, presenting
Arjuna‟s infatuation, their Gandarva marriage, their living together, Chitra‟s
sorrow, Arjuna‟s boredom and his holding for the other Chitra, the falling of
Chitra‟s beauty-mask at the end of the year, Arjuna‟s happy acceptance of real
Chitra and the final spiritual consummation presenting to these in a
delightfully smooth way, offers no clash between the surface-poetic-realistic
level and the deeper symbolic meaning. (168).
The significance of time is first indicated in Chitra‟s words: „had I but the time
needed. . . it is the labor of lifetime to make one‟s true self known and honored‟ (2.34). The
time element is significantly dipped into the play in the form of the God‟s offer of beauty to
Chitra for a span of a year. This central symbol so beautifully and organically lodged in the
play is assisted by the symbolic Gods: Madana, the bodiless of God of abiding love; and
Vasanta, the time-bound God of Spring without whose assistance Madana cannot function.
In the beginning of scene III Chitra shows her pain and pleasure in a very symbolic
way to the Gods. She imagines herself to be a beautiful flower of spring and Arjuna a
butterfly sipping the honey, drop by drop, which the flower has stored during long day. She
says:
I felt a flower which has but few fleeting hours to listen to all the humming
flatteries and whispered murmurs of the woodlands and then lower its eyes
from the sky, bend its head and at a breath give itself up to the dust without a
cry, thus ending the short story of a perfect moment that has neither past nor
future. (1.24).
Here the author – a great craftsman, mingles pleasure with pathos. The pangs of
temporary borrowed beauty of Chitra are compares to a beautiful flower which is a guest of
very few hours. As long as the flower contains nectar, the bees remain glued to it; and soon
after, the flowers bend its head and droops down to the dust. But one should keep in mind
that though the beauty of the flower is short lived, yet it is perfect, always praised and gazed;
ever ready to diffuse its aroma to everybody without distinction, sometimes culled immature
for making a garland for the almighty God.
Regarding the beautiful presentation of symbols and images J.C. Rollo rightly
observes:
Although it is not equal to the Gitanjali in profundity or strength or to The
Gardener in its varied emotions, or to the delicate and exquisite
suggestiveness of the Crescent Moon, yet there is the same beauty of phrasing,
the same flowing rhythm, and in its thought, there is the same firm hold upon
reality, the same truth of feeling and of sympathy and the same arresting
power of symbolism. (49).
The sleeping Arjuna stands for the wintry old age which symbolizes the death of the
fertility demon. Subjected to the attack of the spring-god, he becomes a love inspired young
man. The entry of Arjuna and Chitra into the temple of Shiva symbolizes the quest of the
hero and the heroine into the inner most order of nature or the prescience of the womb of
nature. What Arjuna and Chitra worship at the Shiva temple as a frozen image is symbolic of
what they are going to be in the bower of bliss. The bower of bliss is earthly and succumbs to
the cyclical changes of birth and death. It is denoted by the falling of flowers on Chitra, „each
choosing a bed to die on (1.24). They are the symbols of amore limited range of creatures
those passively participle through normal sexual career.
The sleeping consciousness of the romantic mood is contrasted with the waking
consciousness. Chitra wakes up in the morning to realize consciously what has happened in
the night. Tagore describes that with the first gleam of light and the first twitter of birds, she
rose up and sat leaning on her left arm and Arjuna was asleep with a vague smile about his
lips like the crescent moon in the morning. The morning moon symbolizes the evading
consciousness and the farewell to it the broad daylight. Chitra retains the dreamland
atmospheres of the prelapsarian bower by making the noon bed in the massy fountanous dark
cavern.
In short, Chitra stands for human desire, Arjuna stand as the seeker of love; the Gods
Madana and Vasanta stands for love and youth and beauty respectively. The symbols in
Chitra are an organic part of the theme-Chitra combine the flower of spring with the fruits of
autumn. It also combines heaven and earth.
Chitra is a significant fusion of the two kinds of women characters- the emotional and
the tranquilizing type. She has not received formal education, but well versed in archery. She
advances from the paradise of sensual rapture of the ecstasy of illumination and the
sustaining delight of wisdom. Arjuna accepts her in bliss when she casts a tranquilizing spell
on him.
Rabindranath Tagore‟s concept of human love finds a beautiful expression in Chitra.
The play promotes the very concept of equality of women even in the field specially reserved
for men; she is not the woman who aroused her despair in lonely silence, she is not the
Goddess to be worshipped, not yet the object of common pity to be brushed aside like a moth
with indifference. She has certainly lost one paradise but she has gained another instead.
Which is the real paradise where woman holds undisputed sovereignty as devoted wife and
mother.
Through the character of Chitra, Tagore has forcefully portrayed the picture of
modern Indian woman promoting higher spiritual and psychological sensibilities. On the one
hand Chitra is a very promising princess and bears all the responsibilities towards kingdom.
On the other hand she is a devoted of Arjuna, and becomes the victim of love and
emotions. Arjuna thinks of her as a Goddess of victory and says:
Like a watchful lioness she protects the litter at her dugs with a fierce love.
Woman‟s arms though adorned with nought, but unfettered strength, the
beautiful! My heart is restless, fair one, like a serpent, reviving from his long
winter‟s sleep. Come, let us both race on swift horses side by side, like twin
orbs of light sweeping through space. (22).
Chitra in bold, courageous, daring, determined and she is filled with feeling s of
dedication and devotion towards her duties. She had all the capabilities, which a king should
have. If she lacks in something, it is womanly grace, tenderness and over all physical charm.
In Chitra Tagore has revealed two aspects of woman through the play. She is
portrayed as a person who possesses strength enough to win the biggest battle of the world
and the other one that easily gets shattered by one flow of emotion. She is a complete
personality of a woman, who has commendable patience, sacrifice and dedication.
Tagore has beautifully symbolized her as a great person undergoing mental conflict
on the one hand, and the symbol of strength determination on the other. Chitra has a tender
heart within her strong body and she willfully changes her personality for the sake of love.
She suffered a great mental conflict while presenting her false endeavor before Arjuna and
says:
My body has become my own rival. It is my hateful task to deck her everyday,
to send to my beloved and see her caressed by him. (14).
This attitude reveals the reality about the very nature of the woman- that for the sake
of love and true relationship, she will do any thing to any extern and will sacrifice her life
too. She is ready to lose the most precious thing of her life. She says:
I will reveal my true self to him, a nobler thing than this disguise. If he rejects
it, if he spurn me and break my heart, I will bear even that in silence. (15).
She gets success in winning the heart of Arjuna by her borrowed sublime grace but
she fails before her own self. Chitra very soon realizes the misdeed she had done and wants to
deprive from that falsehood which unfortunately becomes the base of that pious feeling. She
is ready to come out of her illusive face and want her true self loves by Arjuna which is
capable enough to participate in his every brave action. She says to Arjuna:
If you design to keep me by your side, in the path of danger and daring, if you
allow mw to share the great duties of your life then you will know my self.
(24).
This is what the new feminist movement in India stands for as it was heralded by
Tagore and these words of Chitra are undoubtedly a great source of inspiration to the young
educated females of India in twentieth century.
Tagore‟s representation of human love finds a beautiful exposition in Chitra. Tagore
is both an idealist and a realist. He accepts the physical attraction between man and woman as
true. It is equally true that if love is centered on the body and cannot impinge it, it
degenerates into lust. The physical relationship between man and woman is the groundwork
of love and the spiritual relation between them is its composition and the structure of love
would remain incomplete without this composition.
Love finds its attainment when the mind and the heart of the lover are synchronized
with the mind and the heart of the beloved. Arjuna stands for the average man and Chitra for
the average woman. Love between man and woman has a corporal basis. The attainment of
love in Chitra takes place in the last scene of the play when Arjuna meets the real Chitra with
all her physical imperfections and exclaims in delight, that his life is satisfied.
The play is not designed to convey the meaning that sexual wantonness is an act of
adoration. This is clear from the beginning when Arjuna offers his love to Chitra and is ready
to break his vow of celibacy for the sake of love. Chitra is not thrilled with joy. On the other
hand she says:
Whom do you seek in these dark eyes, in these milk white arms, if you are
ready to pay for her the price of your probity? Not my true self, I know. Surely
this cannot be love; this is not man‟s highest homage to woman! Alas, that this
frail disguise, the body, should make one blind to the light of the deathless
spirit! Yes, now indeed, Arjuna, the fame of your heroic manhood is false.
(37).
This passage conceives the body as the disguise and that the real self of a woman
becomes gradually stronger. Then Chitra speaks to Arjuna: „Would it please your heroic soul
if the playmate of the night to be the helpmate of the day, if the left arm learnt to share the
burden of the proud right arm?‟ (37).
In reply Arjuna states his apprehension to know the real self of Chitra in the following
words: “I cannot pay you my dues in return for your priceless gifts. Thus my love is
incomplete. Illusion is the first appearance of Truth” (38). Consequently, he lovingly accepts
Chitra in her original form. And when they are about to part there is a feeling, maturity,
satisfaction and understanding. In essence, the theme Chitra is the evolution of human love.
This idea is best illustrated in the words of K.R.S. Iyengar:
Beauty and youth, although they may be transmit, are yet a part of our
experience. Wisdom lies in neither looking upon the body and its beauty as
ends in themselves, nor in imagining that our life could wholly be separated
from the physical base.
Tagore rejected both „negations‟-the ascetic‟s denial of life as well as the sensualist‟s
denial of the sprit. The blinding maddening ecstasy of the physical union is not only denied in
Chitra but its transience is also recognized.
Even as illusion is but „the first appearance of truth‟ the fever and the throb of the
senses are but a prelude to the less evanescent more subdued, joys of holy wedded love.
There are two unions in Chitra. The first union takes place in the second scene. And
the next union takes place in the ninth scene of the play. This play was not meant for dealing
with a particular passion but for translating the whole subject from one world to another; to
elevate love from the sphere of physical beauty to the external heaven of moral beauty.
The central symbol in Chitra the offering of beauty to Chitra by the Gods, Madana
and Vasanta, for the span of a year grows naturally and spontaneously out of the story. There
is no conflict between the surface-realistic level and the deeper symbolic meaning. The
symbolic meaning is related to the essential duality of love. There is no contradiction
between Infinite and Finite, Truth and Illusion, Sprit and Body, Love and desire, Joy and
Pain, peace and Restlessness, True self and False self, but what is most remarkable in the
play is that the latter i.e., Finite, Illusion, Body, Desire, Pain Restlessness, False self are
transmitted into the former. i.e., Infinite, Truth, Spirit, Love, Joy, Peace and True self. This
transformation occurs primarily because of Time, which plays, a crucial part in the entire
play.
The symbol is assisted by images of flower and fruit and by the image of flame,
which symbolizes the upward, restless, and burning process of love.
Chitra is Tagore‟s deep and profound use of symbolism suffused with music and
rhythm. Here, it is not the bare information or the history of a particular period that matters
but the way of presentation, the poetic exuberance, the metaphoric structure, the imaginative
flight of the poet on „the viewless wings of poesy.‟ Tagore is of the opinion that
Bare information on facts is not literature, because it gives us Merely the facts
which are independent of ourselves. Repetition of the facts that the sun is
round, water is liquid, fire is hot, would be intolerable. But a description of the
beauty of the sunrise has its eternal interest for us,-because there it is not the
fact of the sunrise, but is relation to ourselves, which is the object of perennial
interest. (57)
It is also interesting to note here that most of the images and symbols employed by
Tagore have come out from nature, and the day-to-day life of common man. They seem to be
richly influenced by Wordsworth and Keats, Shelley and Tennyson. In the very opening of
the drama, Tagore shows his deft mastery of Nature images through the retrospective vision
of the protagonist: “I found a narrow sinuous path meandering through the dusk of the
entangled boughs, the foliage vibrated with the chirping of crickets, when of a sudden I came
upon a man lying on a bed of dried leaves, across my path.” (58)
The female protagonist of the book, Chitra, behaves like a boy, and so when she sees
Arjuna in the forest, all of a sudden she feels like a woman. This scene reminds us of
Shakespeare‟s The Tempest, where Miranda, the girl of nature, is startled to see Ferdinand
and, consequently, she falls in love with him.
We know Tagore is also a great painter. Like most of the Pre-Raphaelite poets, he
brought painting into poetry. Sometimes, he describes his object in such a manner that it
resembles a great painting. One such example can be seen in the retrospective dreaming of
Chitra‟s beauty by Arjuna in the opening of the second scene:
She bowed herself above the shining mirror of the lake and saw the reflection
of her face. She stared up in awe and stood still; then smiled, and with a
careless sweep of her left arm unloosed her hair and let it trail on the earth at
her feet. She bared her bosom and looked at her arms, so flawlessly modeled,
and instinct with an exquisite caress. (58)
Through this pictorial passage, the author seems to point out Chitra‟s long-subdued
female urge which now craves fulfillment. Here Tagore has succeeded in delineating the
female psychology through the image of the Baring of bosom‟ and „looking at the arms.‟
The spell of the heavenly beauty of Chitra dissolves Arjuna‟s vows of celibacy and
penance. His prowess and manhood bow down meekly before her beauty. The poet opines:
“Alas, that this frail disguise, the body, should make one blind to the light of the deathless
spirit.” (59)
As a matter of fact, human body is borrowed for a very short span of time. The only
thing real is the „deathless spirit‟. But unfortunately, man is so much enticed and ensnared by
the materialistic world that he begins to take the real to be the unreal and vice versa.
True beauty always prevails over man‟s strength and prowess. The same is the case
with Arjuna, who being blinded with the illusion of beauty, begins to think this unreal,
transitory beauty as a perfect completeness once and for ever: “Ah, I feel how vain is fame,
the pride of prowess! Everything seems to me a dream-You alone are perfect. You are the
wealth of the world, the end of all poverty, the goal of all efforts, the one woman.” (60)
Hence the dialogue between Arjuna and Chitra seems to be a eternal dialogue
between truth and illusion, between outward manifestation and inner-self; between the
deceptive wind and the voice of consciousness. The reply of Chitra, in a way, suggests the
voice of consciousness of a man who is ensnared by the illusion of the charms or fancy. It
reminds us of John Keats‟ Lamia in which Apollonius prevents Lucius, his disciple, from
being entangled in the fake charm of Lamia‟s beauty.
In the beginning of scene III, Chitra shows her pain and pleasure in a very symbolic
way to the God Madana. She imagines herself to be a beautiful flower of spring and Arjuna a
butterfly sipping the honey drop by drop which the flower had stored during the long day.
The flower image can also be seen in the end scene IV when Chitra devotes herself entirely to
the sweet love of Arjuna. She says:
Leave the little wild flower where it was born; leave it beautifully to die at the
day‟s end among all fading blossoms and decaying leaves. Don‟t take it to
your palace hall to fling it on the stony floor which knows no pity for things
that fade and are forgotten. (61)
Here the phrase, “little wild flower suggests Chitra and the phrase” “decay in leaves”
and “fading blossoms” arouses our pity and terror. The phrase „stony floor‟ suggests the cold
and apathetic behavior of the philosophical people of the court who lack the sense of true
love and sympathy. Here image reminds us of Keats‟ famous poem „Ode to a Nightingale‟ in
which the bird represents the immortal world of art and beauty while the poet, of this mortal
world of fret and fever.
Tagore must have been influenced by the Irish literary movement. Tagore has created
a wonderfully rounded form for a play racing the passage of the human soul through the
eternal cycle of innocence and experience and consummation. To sum up, Tagore‟s Chitra is
a fine example of creative genius. It is the quintessence of romance. Thompson considers it
“the loveliest drama and a lyrical feast” (125) and Ernest Rhys imagines it “a piece of
sculpture.” (122)
A Close study of the play reveals the fact that it is a play of various contrasts like fact
and fantasy, illusion and reality, physical and spiritual, youth and beauty. E.M. Forster rightly
holds the view as follows: “the story is told with faultless delicacy and grace; its action is no
stronger than a flower and the fragrance of blossom clings round every phase” (112). Thus
Tagore has wonderfully conveyed in this drama “an endless meaning in the narrow span of a
song.” (Joshi 70)
In the following chapter an attempt is made to analyze the symbols in The Post Office.
Chapter III
Symbolism in The Post Office
Rabindranath Tagore (1861-1941) was one of the finest flowers of Indian
Renaissance. The span of his life witnessed hectic activity in all fields of national life. The
emergence of an Independent national spirit, re-discovering itself was a spectacular
phenomenon. And Tagore made rich contribution in the matter of redefining the Indian spirit
in the modern context. In Stray Birds. Tagore said, “No, I will never be the leader, brothers,
of this new age of new Bengal. I shall not trouble to light the lamp of culture for the
benighted…” (25)
That is what exactly he has done-he has lit the lamp of the Spirit, and consequently
has shown the way for the world. Tagore was essentially a poet. His characteristic utterance
was naturally a symbol or an image. His imagination gave him eyes, ears, wings and a
melodious voice. Whether he wrote a play or a novel or a short story, Tagore the poet was
there with his harp, and the result was a musical thought.
W.B.Yeats, the most ardent admirer of Tagore has discouraged the reader to trace the
allegory or symbolism in the play The Post Office. Even a simple reading of the play reveals
that the play does have the symbolism of a deep kind in all its rich connotations and varied
manifestations. Tagore himself has commented that the play The Post Office should be “read
through the eyes of a child.” (Rukhaiyar 59)
It is to be noted that in The Post Office symbolism as a dramatic device has been
different from that of Chitra. In the earlier plays symbols are more ethereal than terrestrial;
suggestions are often dim and vague. Denotation and connotation often fall far apart.
But in The Post Office we have a sense of firm concreteness and connotation and
denotation are close to each other. The post office, door windows are all concrete. Characters
like Madav, Doctor, Watchman, curd seller and Gaffer are common folks.
Another notable feature is that in the play the conflict of themes, emotions and
characters has been expressed with the help of contrasted symbols. Madav is a crude
materialist. Hence his language has no color or music. On the other hand, Amal‟s speech has
imagination and emotion as also a lyrical lilt. This shows the conflict between the poetic and
the prosaic form. Even more notable feature of the play is images and symbols that refer to
Time. Throughout the play we find constant reference to time with subtle variations in its
density in accordance with the tone and temper of the situation, a feature that has been
discussed in this brief analysis.
According to G.D Khanolkar “the dominant theme of The Post Office is the longing
for the far horizons: (Rao 33) as in O‟Neill‟s Beyond the Horizon. From the day of his
writing this play, it is observed that Tagore became more and more eager to escape from the
narrow confines of his work and place and to roam in the great open spaces.
Prof. Sen Gupta has rightly said that The Post Office is “impeccable in construction
and the message it conveys springs spontaneously out of the plot of the human story: (Rao
35). According to Prof. K.R.S Iyengar, The Post Office is one of the most deeply significant
of Tagore‟s plays, which a child could read and understand though it might intrigue the
grown ups. (Rao 35)
The theme of The Post Office seems to be the liberation of the child Amal from the
bondage of various kinds-social, psychological, emotional and spiritual. Freedom from all
kinds of bondage has been the prime quest of Tagore. This theme occurs in several of his
poems and plays. In Gitanjali, he says: “Freedom is all I want: (Poem XXVIII). The last line
of the poem “Where the mind is without Fear” is: “Into that heaven of freedom, let my
country awake.” (Poem XXXV)
As a boy Tagore had been too well looked after by his servants, and this had irked
him. It is said that he often had to spend hours in a room sitting near a window opening out
into the garden and the pond. With all the imaginative fervor of a boy, young Rabindranath
must have thirsted for the „Great Beyond‟ as an escape from his cribbed existence within the
four walls of the room. One of his famous songs magnificently recaptures this mood:
I am listless; I am a wanderer in my heart. In the sunny haze of the languid
hours, what vast vision of thing takes shape in the blue of the sky… I forget, I
ever forget, that the gates are shut everywhere in the house where I dwell
alone! (The Gardener V)
And there is another song in which the poet heats the answering steps:
I was singing all alone in a corner, and the melody caught your ear. You came
down and stood at my cottage door (Gitanjali XIIX)
Knock, and the door opens; call, and the response follows. As action and reaction are
equal and opposite in the physical world, so also in the spiritual world too, „aspiration‟ and
„response‟ have a casual relation.
There are only two Acts in The Post Office. In Act I, the sick child squatting near the
window muses and talks to the strangers that pass along; in Act II, the child is in bed, and
people talk to him or watch him sleep. In the first movement, the boy looks out into the
world, in the second, the world flows into the child‟s consciousness. There are, of course, two
planes of action in the play.
Tagore wrote The Post Office when he wrote his master piece Gitanjali. It deals wi5th
5the longing for freedom by Amal, a little boy, who has been severely ill. He was forced to
remain in his room and was not permitted to go out. Madav has adopted him and is very
anxious to preserve his life. The village physician advises him to keep Amal within a small
room and not to expose him to wind and cold. Amal, the little boy longs for freedom from his
bondage. Amal looks at the outer world from his window and is fascinated by the stream of
life. He looks at the street laborers going out in search of job and the children at play. Amal
says “I wish to fly with the time to that land of which no one knows anything.” (3.234)
On the realistic plane, the child looks out avid for experience and is particularly
excited by the news about the new post office. He would very much like to receive a better
from the King! The distant isle too excites the child, for he would like to go there with
Gaffer! If the Parrots‟ Isle which is a more exercise of Gaffer‟s fancy takes a firm hold on
the child‟s imagination, 6the post office which is but a big house with a flag flying high up
comes to be invested in the child‟s mind with a romantic, even a mystic aura, out of all
proportion to its actual functions. Thus, on the spiritual plane, the drama comprises the
child‟s (or the soul‟s) dream of the Parrots‟ Isle, his in6tense longing for the letter from the
King, and the coming of the King himself to the child. The sick-room at one end, the
„parrots‟ isle at the other end and, in between, The Post Office, which is both a visible
institution, and a symbolic clearing-house for the transmission of human aspiration in one
direction and of the grace of response in the opposite direction. There is a letter, and a reply;
likewise, there is the surge of aspiration from below, and the answering response from above.
The watchman tells him that the new big house he sees on the other side of the road
with its flag flying high is the post office and some fine day there may be a letter for him
from the King. During his severe illness, Amal imagines that the King‟s postman is coming
down to the hillside with lantern in his hand and a bag of letters on his back. He feels quite
happy and says: “I will be the King‟s postman one day.” (2.110)
The state physician comes and opens wide all the doors and windows and asks Amal
whether he would like to leave his bed when the King comes in the midnight. Amal says “Of
course; I am dying to be about for ever so long. I will ask the King to find me the polar star. I
must have seen it often, but I do not know exactly which it is.” (3.250)
Everything becomes quiet. Amal sleeps and the lamp is blown out. His life‟s day is
done. As K.R.S Iyengar observes:
In Amal the aspiration and divine response meet and the result is the new
birth, new physical death; the divine has come to the parched human heart and
there will now ensure the burst of a new spring of life and joy. (143)
Although apparently Amal is asleep, he tells Gaffer “I can hear everything. Yes, and
voices far away” (3.249). There is a knock at the door and the King‟s herald enters to
announce that the king himself would come in the midnight and is sending his “great
physician to attend on his young friend” (3.280) The King‟s physician is a mystic presence.
He represents the healing power of the omnipresent God. Even though He is invisible, His
very presence is felt everywhere. On the arrival of the King‟s physician the doors and
windows are opened and Amal feels that “all pain is gone” (3.284). Amal is in deep slumber
and Sudha the little flower girl arrives with the flowers and “places the flowers in Amal‟s
own hands;” (3.282)
The Post Office deals with the theme of spiritual quest and deliverance. There is
bondage in seclusion and there is freedom in union with all. Amal is the symbol of human
soul yearning to become one with God, the King. The meaning of King‟s letter is a message
of the deliverance and the death of Amal represents the end of spiritual bondage.
Amal‟s confinement in the small room symbolizes the human soul imprisoned in the
mortal body. Amal‟s soul has received the “call of the open road” (Madhusudana Rao 37),
where there is light and beauty. But it is denied to his soul which is imprisoned in his body.
The only way to secure freedom for the soul is through death, as death is said to be the
emancipation of spirit. Therefore the doors and windows of the room are opened on the
arrival of the king‟s physician. The opening of the gate by the King‟s physician symbolizes
the opening of the human mind to the experience of nature. Chaubey has aptly observed:
The longings of Amal are extended to journey even the Beyond. The lack of
communion with the outside world is a symbol of society forcing alienation,
anger on the harmless beings. These harmless beings are unnecessarily
tortured by unknown forces. (48)
For Amal, the King‟s post office is a constant source of peace and happiness. Amal
becomes a symbol of innocence. He tries sot seek from the chains of society. He knows that
nobody lives forever; and nothing lasts for long. Amal is suffering but perhaps it is out of
love that God sends suffering. The suffering Amal sees a life of a labor and wants to eat gram
flour like a laborer. He is attracted by the stream and the scenic beauty. He finds something
wonderful in all that happens in the outside world. Amal is unhappy as “no one ever takes
him away‟ (3.235). Every one wants him to stay inside.
The Post Office is colored by the recollection on death and mysterious call from the
far off. The letter is an important symbol and serves as bridges between the known and the
unknown. From the post office, the King writes letters which are to be sent to various people.
One fine day, there might be a letter from the King to Amal.
The next important symbol that draws our attention is the post office, which gives the
play its title. A symbol performs two functions sin a poem or a play. First it provides an
emotional centre around which a pattern may evolve. Secondly, it places in focus the
emotional attitudes towards important quest of all kinds. This symbol is very much complex
and works on several levels in different parts of the play. As S.K. Desai has rightly observed:
The Post office might be the whole world; the King might be God sending
messages of eternity to everyone, according to their capacity for reception,
through the visible nature. (57)
On the simplest level, the post office receives and gives letters, which contain
information. It was the most popular medium of communication before the invention of the
modern electronic media. There have been several poems on people anxiously waiting for
5the postman. A man who is looking wistfully toward a post office is a man longing for some
information from somebody. Communication is itself a kind of ventilation. Thus, the symbol
of post office gives a concrete base to the theme of freedom from all kinds of bondage-
physical, emotional, and psychological and spiritual which is the leitmotif of this play.
One of the important and recurrent symbols in the play is time. When the watchman
sounds the gong, Amal asks him:
Amal : won‟t you sound the gong, watchman?
Watchman : Time has not yet come.
Amal : How curious! Some say time has not yet
come, And some say time has gone by! But
surely your time will come the Moment You strike
the Gong!
Watchman : that‟s not possible; I strike up the gong only
when it is time
Amal : Yes, I love to hear your gong… Tell me,
why does your gong sound?
Watchman : My gong sounds to tell the people. Time
waits for none, but goes on forever (1.21)
In the symbol suggests time and its conquest. In this world we are bound by time. All
of us want to conquer time. But the task is not easy. It calls for great suffering and penance.
Only then does the Great Deliverer come to free us from the mortal coils of time. Amal‟s
deliverance suggests, among other things, this note as well.
The King represents Almighty God. As Edward Thompson says, “Tagore‟s plays
have plenty of Kings. The symbolism of Raja (King) is very gently and touchingly expressed
in the play The Post Office” 120. The King‟s physician brigs the message of emancipation
through death and thus completes the symbolical meaning of the play, but the King is
necessary to round off the fairy tale. As Prof. D.V.K. Raghavacharyulu points out:
The post Office is a perfect fairy tale in the senses that one can submit to its
pathos and fancy without any disbelief and without raising disturbing
questions regarding the play‟s deeper intent or i6ts proportions of allegory,
myth and symbolism. It takes forward its dramatic action structurally to the
one question:
What is there beyond Horizon? (Rao 35)
It is because of Amal‟s loves for the far away that this simple drama links itself to the
fairy tale, and we find an appropriate play in it for Gaffer who roams about from place to
place. He tells Amal tales of the Isle of parrots where there are no men and where the parrots
neither speak nor walk but simply sing and fly. The parrots Isle is a symbol that stands for
human aspiration. It stands as a contrast to the symbol represented by the post office which
stands for human life. Gaffer also learns a new fairy tale of the post man from Amal.
In his preface to The Post Office, W. B.Yeats splay emphasis on‟ deliverance as the
theme of the play‟, the deliverance which the child discovers 8in death. Although The Post
Office ends in death and the state physician brings the message of deliverance, yet a good
deal of drama is also about the earth, its joys which Amal wants to find by freeing himself
from the limitation imposed body his uncle. In this symbolical drama, we are rarely away
from the beauties of the open air, and if a hidden truth reveals itself, it does so not through
abnormal instincts and emotions but through yearning of a child for the world stretching
beyond his window.
An attention to Tagore‟s own interpretation of The Post Office helps us to understand
the over reaching meaning of the play.
Amal represents the man whose soul has received the call of the open-he seeks
freedom from the comfortable enclosure of habits sanctioned by the prudent
and from the walls of rigid opinion built for him by the respectable.
(Chakravorthy 133).
But, Madav, the worldly-wise one, consider his restlessness to be the sign of the final
malady, and his adviser, the physician, the custodian of the conventional platitudes-with his
questions from prescribed text books full of maxims-gravely nods his head and say that
freedom is unsafe and very care should be taken the sick boy within the walls. Tagore
used symbols that they have been part either of the life of the common people or of the
ancient Indian tradition. Only by using them unconsciously could he transform them into the
living symbols, not of any particular time but of the past, the present and the future in one. In
this sense, his work may be said to be archetypal. In The Times Literary Supplement, Reddy
has commented:
Tagore has the rare gift which some poets and writers of fairy stories have, of
unconsciously using symbols while consciously writing interesting story. But
he appears to be aware of his gift, and for this reason he is not like the writers
of fairy stories, and is indeed, half-way between Coleridge and T.S. Eliot. (89)
The last scene is also symbolic. It shows sleep, death and silence but all suffused with
an aura of great liberation. Sleep comes softly. The lamp is to be blown out. Only the starlight
is to be let in. The unimaginative Madav asks, “How will star light help”? (1.57). any
common man would feel the same way. Starlight is to be contrasted with the light of the oil
lamp. The light of the lamp can help us to see only the physical things, but the light of the
stars reveals its vision of the Great Beyond.
The symbolism of the last lime of the play is to be noted. Sudha tells the Royal
physician to tell the dying Amal, whom she consider to be sleeping “that Sudha has not
forgotten him‟ (1.59). The symbolism of the statement depends upon the meaning of the
word Sudha-both denotative and connotative. Sudha, the character, in the symbolic scheme of
the things is a foil to materialists like Madav. She is a symbol of love and affection. Perhaps
she wants to convey to Amal that she has always remembered him. Connotatively, in Hindi
the word „Sudha‟ means nectar, and its innumerable variants. The symbolic meaning, then
would be that Amal is not dead, that he has with Sudha, tasted the drink of immortality. We
know that it is only the body that dies and that the soul is immortal.
To consider the play as a complete and consistent allegory is to miss its human and
emotional appeal. One of the simplest suggestions on the subject is that, the play is an
expression of the irresistible longing felt by the poet in 1911 to shake himself free of the
chains of family, and wander at will through the wide world. He sought relief from his
restlessness by writing The Post Office in four days: As G.D.Khanolkar observes:
The lad Amal is the boy Tagore, and the play expressed that mysterious call
that came to his and the emotions it awakened. The restless poet is at thirst to
wander far away; he sits by the window as the day departs, waiting till it shall
return. The dominant theme of The Post Office is the longing for the far
horizons. (160-162).
The play, however, cannot be accepted at its face value, though reading it with no pre-
conceived notions of allegorical significance is quite rewarding. That it has a deeper meaning
or meanings is clear from many passages and especially the closing scene. But the inner
meaning should be felt rather than known; it should be sensed emotionally rather than
apprehended intellectually. To be dogmatic about any particular interpretation is to be unjust
to the play and miss its rich suggestiveness; to seek consciously for underlying meaning
meanings or to attempt to build a consistent theory about its true significance is to fail to
appreciate its elusive beauty.
There is a touch of elusiveness about the sick child Amal‟s relationship with Madav
who has only adopted him. His very name signifies innocence and original purity. The
children literature has always represented proximity to man‟s source in the divine being. As
Christ himself has said:
Suffer the little children to come unto me, and forbid them not; for of such is
the kingdom of God. Verily I say unto you, whosoever shall not receive the
Kingdom of God as a little child he shall not enter there in. (Rao.31).
In The Post Office, symbols play the role of what Eliot calls „Objective Correlative‟
which he defines as:
A set of objects, a situation, a chain of events which shall be the formula of
that particular emotion; such that when the external facts, which must
terminate in sensory experience, are given, the emotion is immediately
evoked. (177).
Tagore is a great spiritual realist. He says that the finite self is like a bird in the cage
which can‟t move and fly in the vast blue sky. Madav confines Amal within the four-walls
and does not allow him to come in close contact with nature but ultimately he is delivered
from the bondage. Tagore writes:
It is said in a verse of the Upanishads that this world is . . .all pervaded by one
supreme unity, and therefore true enjoyment can never be had through the
satisfaction of greed, but only through the surrender of our individual self to
the Universal Self. (14).
The Post Office is colored by recollections on death and mysterious call from the far
off. The letter is an important symbol and serves as a bridge between the known and the
unknown. Is Amla‟s death that is so readily taken for granted necessary to the scheme of the
play? There is, of course, the Watchman‟s reference in Act I to one greater than Amla‟s
physician who “lets us free”. And Amal himself expression to go, for he “can‟t stick on here
any more”. This may be read in con junction with the arrival of the King‟s Physician in Act
II, and we may conclude that he comes to the sick chamber only to „release‟ the child.
We may say that The Post Office is beautiful, touching, and within its limits it can be
regarded as an almost perfect piece of art, its true significance apart, the play is one of the
finest things of its kind in any literature. The most enthusiastic encomiums have been
showered on it by the critics of Tagore. It is a delicate little masterpiece. Yeats in his preface
to it said of that “it is perfectly constructed and conveys to the right audience an emotion of
gentleness and peace.‟ (Sastri.330).
Thompson who thinks that the play has been greatly overrated is, however, full of
praise for the portrayal of Amal:
It does successfully what both Shakespeare and Kalidasa failed to do, brings
on to the stage a child who neither‟ shows off‟ nor is silly. (215).
He also praise Tagore for the perfect language which keeps the play from sliding into
a „hopeless mush and welter of sentimentalism.‟ (213).
What is more remarkable about The Post Office is use of symbols in the play. The
Post Office becomes a symbol of the universe; the king stands for God, the postmasters ate
the four seasons representing the visible nature. The letter is the message of eternity, the
message calling us to reach God. The Blank Slip of paper symbolizes the message of God
which every one is free to interpret according to one‟s own lights. The Post Office is the
place where messages are received and delivered and where is ample scope for
communication. Amal‟s confinement to the small room symbolizes the human soul
imprisoned in the mortal body.
The Post Office is a genuine symbolic play, yielding more meaning at every
successive reading. The play is successful, because the naturalistic level is maintained
throughout-even in the last scene in which there is „fantasy‟. It is because the play‟s roots are
in reality, in life, that it can be what it is and at the same time radiate meanings and evoke
significant emotions. Again, since Tagore does not use symbolism in a conscious, deliberate
way, it has acquired, through increased suggestiveness, its richness and many sidedness.
Thus Tagore‟s play The Post Office is replete with symbolism and in the chapter an
attempt is made to analyze the symbols in Chandalika.
Chapter IV
Symbolism in Tagore’s Chandalika
Tagore‟s plays are plays of symbols than of characters and incidents and they
certainly express a philosophy: „Not the logic of careful plotting, but the music of ideas and
symbols is the soul of the drama‟ (K.R.S.Iyengar 26). Even the titles of plays and names of
the characters are symbolic. Rabindranath Tagore‟s Chandalika is the shortest but most
powerful play. It is a poetic drama. In this play, images and symbols play a vital role and all
the conflict takes place in the theater of the soul.
Chandalika is the shortest (only 20 pages), but most powerful. It is a poetic drama.
The Buddhist monk Ananda awakens self-awareness and self-respect in Prakriti by saying,
„Give me water and accepting it in his cupped hands, a transformation id brought by him in
the character of Prakriti. His simple words “Give me water” acquires in incantatory effect and
runs through the fabric of the play as a silver thread.
In the popular Buddhist legend the girl gives him water and falls in love with the
beautiful monk. She draws him back to her through music. But the monk, at the last moment
saves himself through prayer and goes away. This crude plot of the popular tale has been
transformed by Tagore into a psychological; drama of intense spiritual conflict. Chandalika is
not the story of a wicked girl roused to lust by the physical body of the monk, but of a very
sensitive girl. Condemned by her birth to a despised caste, who is suddenly awakened to a
consciousness of her full rights as a woman and a human being.
Based on an ancient Buddhist legend Tagore‟s Chandalika is the story of Prakriti, a
Chandals or untouchable girl who is lost in wonder that Ananda, the famous disciple of the
Buddha had asked for a cup of water at the well, in spite of her warning him of her lower
birth. His words: “. . .don‟t humiliate yourself; self-humiliation is a sin, worse than self-
murder” (1.148). Rings the theme of the play.
His sense of identity begins to flower though her mother cautions her against it.
Prakriti‟s effusive gratitude turns into desire for the handsome monk. She persuades her
mother to cast a spell over him and bring him to her bed. “My birth is washed clean” says
Prakriti. The new “birth” she refers to is her “self-knowledge‟. Prakriti, now awakened, does
not want to sink back into darkness and dirt. She wants to dedicate herself to the great one.
“Make me forget that I am born of dust” says the “flower”. She also says, “The earth must
offer its worship through me” (30). Thus the individual desire of the low-caste girl Prakriti
becomes the universal urge of Nature to regain its original status of the Divine, in this cosmic
Drama of Decent and Ascent.
Again in the play, Ananda, with some other Bhikshus passes by the well, unmindful
of Prakriti. Her heart is broken. She becomes possessed and makes her mother use the
primeval spell of magic to drag the proud monk back to her door. Her Mother argues and
cautions her. But Prakriti is impetuous.
The spell is cast. There is a great spiritual fight and intense suffering in all the three
for fifteen days. In the end, Ananda comes with a distorted and agonized face. All the glow
and fire of purity is missing. Prakriti stops the spell and begs his pardon. The great lord
forgives all and Prakriti‟s mother dies as a consequence of her magic spell.
One of the arresting characters in Chandalika is the Buddhist Monk, Ananda. Even
though Prakriti is the central character in the play, it is impossible to separate her character
from that of Ananda. The presence of Ananda is felt throughout the play. Everything about
him is seen through the eyes of Prakriti. Tagore with skillful diction and clever manipulation
of language has succeeded in portraying the character of Ananda springing alive before the
mind‟s eye.
Ananda, being a Sanyasi has renounced all the material comforts. He lives a life of
renunciation which is shown as a quest towards spiritual perfection. Northrop Frye speaks of
the three main stages of a successful quest:
. . . the stage of the perilous journey and the preliminary minor adventures; the
crucial struggle, usually some kind of battle in which either the hero or his
foe, or both, must die; and the exaltation of the hero. . . . (187).
The quest of Ananda, no doubt, involves all these three stages. The act of mastering
all human passions is not within the reach of all and sundry but a few. It demands strenuous
tempering of both the physique and the psyche. Overwhelmed by Ananda‟s holiness Prakriti
tells: “His form was radiant as with the light of dawn.” (1.148).
Prakriti would never touch his feet for fear of polluting them. Long years of penance
and strict adherence to the religious norms have given celestial and radiant form to him. The
rigorous process of subduing the conflicting passions and detaching himself from the worldly
care is adventurous which may be linked worth a perilous journey.
The meeting of Prakriti with Ananda is a heaven sent moment in her life for it paves
the way for her new birth which may be viewed as a short of adventure. His act of talking a
few compassionate words to Prakriti and accepting water from her hands sets the story on the
onward movement. At a time when untouchability as a social evil was reining supremacy, her
chance of meeting the monk brings out a complete evolution in her character. The words of
Ananda,
. . .if the block clouds of Sravana are dubbed Chandal, he said, what of it? It
doesn‟t change their nature, or destroy the virtue of their water. Don‟t
humiliate yourself, he said: self-humiliation is a sin, worse than self-murder.
(1.147)
The word of Ananda rings in her heart and makes her feel invigorated and nourished.
Her suppressed spirit bursts forth and she attains self-consciousness. By saving a soul from
the sin of self-degradation, Ananda takes a progressive step towards his destination. Prakriti
feels that the water which she poured into the hands of Ananda has purged off the stain of her
birth and feels ennobled and redeemed.
Lust gives way temporarily to reverential devotion and so Prakriti feels:
Such little words, yet as might as flame they filled all my days with light.
They rolled away the black stone whose weight so long has stopped the
foundations of my heart, and the joy bubbled forth. (3.155)
The words of the Buddhist monk Ananda-“Give me water” (1.148) acquire an
incantatory effect and run through the fabric of the play. They symbolize her „awakening‟
and freedom from bondage. “My birth is washed clean” (1.150) says Prakriti. The new „birth‟
she refers to is her „self-knowledge‟.
Ananda opines that “Water becomes for Prakriti a symbol of life, of the recognition
and respect which is the rightful due of every human being regardless of his of her birth”
(1.88). When she recollects Ananda‟s words “Give me water”, her being overflows with
happiness.
She feels so much offended when she sees Ananda for the second time since he never
looks in her direction. Filled with anger and shame, she vows to break his pride and dissuade
him from the path of renunciation. She confesses: “his lamp will go out; his path will be lost
in darkness.‟ (2.165)
Prakriti now awakened, does not want to sink back into darkness and dirt. She wants
to dedicate herself to the great one. The desire of Prakriti makes her compel her mother to
practice the magic spell. Her longing is so great says: “If my longing can drew him here, an if
it is a crime, then I will commit the crime. I care nothing for a code which holds only
punishment and no comfort” (1.155). On seeing the passionate yearning of Prakriti, her
mother brushes aside all her misgivings and resolves to practice it. She prays to Ananda,
O thou exalted one; thy power to forgive is greater far than my power to
offend. I am about to do thee dishonor, yet I bow before; accept my obedience,
Lord (2.165).
Totally ignorant of the net that has been woven around him, Ananda continues with
his journey to Vaishali. The casting of the spell leads to Ananda‟s crucial struggle, the second
stage of quest. As a result, the spell works havoc on the primal instincts of Ananda which in
turn makes him undergo intense suffering. The soul-struggle of Ananda is both awe-inspiring
and realistic. By long years of discipline, Ananda has built a wall of resistance around him
enables him to withstand the pull during the first fifteen days.
Feeling exhausted, the mother tells Prakriti, “My spells have no more power, child;
there is no breath left in my body” (2.166). She says further “I have worked the spell through
all its stages-such force might have brought down Indra of the thunderbolt himself. And yet,
he does not come. It is a fight to the death indeed.” (2.166).
Prakriti urges her mother to speed up her act, because if she fails in her attempt to
draw him, she would have to return to the illusion of a Chandal birth. In addition to the
exercise of the spell, Prakriti also performs some ceremonies in order to make the pull even
stronger. At last Ananda comes with a distorted and agonized face. All the glow and radiance
of purity is missing.
At this crucial moment, a sudden change comes over her and she becomes
disheartened and perplexed as to what is going to offer him except her wretched self.
Moreover to her utter horror and dismay, the mirror reflects a completely distorted and
disfigured Ananda. This is not expected by Prakriti in the least and she realizes the folly of
her deed. Ananda devoid of radiance and purity is not the man to whom she wanted to
surrender herself. She realizes that true love expects nothing in return and implores her
mother to undo the spill. She is remorse-stricken to see Ananda coming before her with a
drooping head. The mother stops her spell and begs his pardon. The great lord forgives all
and the mother dies.
There are innumerable small and great symbols throughout the drama. The Kin‟s son
“hunting for the beast‟ symbolizes all those who see only the flesh of the woman and not her
soul. “The house of darkness‟ is the state of ignorance of the self. “Water” is the symbol of
love. “Black stone on my heart” is the weight of castle label. “Fire” is a great purifier and a
symbol of purity, “dust” symbolizes lowliness, “flower” is a symbol of woman; “bloom” is a
symbol of full development of soul; “light” symbolizes self-knowledge or love. Autumnal
clouds symbolize free floating things, detached persons like the monks. Prakriti utters “The
hurt will I bathe in the deep waters of my pain‟s Immensity”. (1.148).
This “pain‟s immensity” refers to the suffering heart of Prakriti and her unbound
oceanic love. When Prakriti says that her suffering and Ananda‟s sufferings are one, it
becomes a complex symbol. It is a union of souls. Souls unite through the fires of suffering.
She also speaks of the fusion, of “gold” and “copper” in the great fire. Gold stands for
Ananda and Copper for Prakriti, for Spirit and Earth, for Heaven and Earth. That is why she
tells him boldly in the end, “I have dragged you down to earth, how else you could raise me
to your heaven?” (2.168).
Thus in Chandalika, Prakriti stands for nature, Mother for the earth, the symbol of
patience, suffering and understanding. The primal spell may be taken as the force of
attraction in nature, particularly for sex, Ananda stands for spirit, the awakening and bliss,
even the word “Chandals” is made to represent people with mean spirits. The union of Ganga
and Jamuna is the union of the white and the dark of spirit and Nature, of Ananda and
Prakriti. The greatness of Chandalika les in the fact that within a short span, the writer was
able to embody so many higher ideals which make human life dignified and distinguished.
Of all the plays, Chitra and The Post Office can be considered as the most symbolic
plays. But they are mystical in nature and deal with personal quest. Chandalika can be
regarded as a study in contemporary social problems and at the same time it presents spiritual
drama of great interest in symbolic terms. The Tagore‟s vision of the universals behind the
particulars is effectively conveyed through these highly symbolic dramas. The following
chapter makes an attempt to summarize the findings of this study.
Chapter V
Conclusion
Rabindranath Tagore the Nobel Laureate is a poet, playwright, essayist, novelist,
short-story writer, musician, painter, academician and a philosopher. Commenting on the
influences of Tagore, Sastri says: “Indian Renaissance is Tagore and Tagore is Indian
Renaissance” (69). He is called “The flower of Indian Renaissance” (69) and Edward
Thompson praises him as an extraordinary dramatist. Tagore is a humanitarian to the
core. He sees deep into the human heart and portrays it with a remarkable understanding.
Tagore also pains nature in unforgettable colors. He feels the pulse of nature in her varying
moods. He is not the poet of Man and Nature‟ he is also a singer of God. Tagore‟s multi-
faced genius has found expression through dramas and novels, essays and short stories.
Tagore firmly believed that God could never be realized by discarding life and the
enjoyment of the good things of the world. To him, asceticism is only a negative virtue. Only
through love and compassion, and by accepting all bondage and attachment, one could realize
the supreme.
In Tagore‟s works the theme is man in relation to God. The King of the Dark
Chamber was the first of these attempts to invade the invisible. It was followed by The Post
Office.
The most prominent theme in almost all his poetical work revolves around the relation
between the Finite and the Infinite. To Him, God is no remote Absolute but an entity emoting
Sath, Chit and Ananda and the universe a joyous expression of god‟s play and human love a
step to the divine.
Tagore‟s attempt to fertilize this area between allegory and symbol could be seen in
some of his plays such as: The King of the Dark Chamber, The Post Office, Mukta-Dhara and
Red Oleanders. The Play is obviously an attempt to put into dramatic from the Vaishnava
philosophy of the relationship between God and the soul and the play is perfectly intelligible
to one who is acquainted with the philosophy.
Rabindranath Tagore has been the source of supreme inspiration to millions in
modern India. His works stir our spirit, refine our life and give profound satisfaction to our
mind. Hindu tradition influenced activity in the home itself. Tagore‟s family was educated,
enlightened and progressive unlike must of the orthodox and superstitious Hindu families. All
the family members had literary, artistic and progressive taste. There was much artistic
cultural and literary activity at his home. He had notable experiences, which expanded and
uplifted his mind and spirit. From his childhood, he was taught to chant in correct accents the
selected mantras from the Upanishads arranged by his father under the Upanishads were used
in daily worship.
The forest homes of ancient India (Tapovana) always had a special appeal to the mind
of Rabindranath Tagore. He was a philosopher, a religious teacher and practitioner. All his
activities were part of an undivided and ceaseless quest for self-realization through manifold
contact with world and life. Tagore writes, “Deliverance is not for me in renunciation; I feel
the embrace of freedom in a thousand bonds of delight‟. (Gitanjali verse No: 73). He
condemns isolation in ivory tower and makes a forceful plea for participation”. Where the
whole world finds its shelter.
The study has brought to light the following findings. The use of symbolism in plays
like, Chitra, The Post Office, and Chandalika are remarkably successful. The Post Office and
its success of symbolism could be attributed to the fact that it subordinates to naturalism to a
great extent. But Chitra and Chandalika are lyrical and poetic. In Chitra, and Chandalika the
context in which the symbols and images is not some nondescript would, like that of Red
Oleanders of The King of the Dark Chamber or even of Mukta-Dhara but the well-known
world of mythology and tradition, where as in The Post Office it is the recognizable world of
day-to-day life, in the context of which the very objects or phenomena belonging to real life
are transferred into symbols through „Poetry‟
Tagore‟s representation of human love finds a beautiful exposition in his play Chitra.
In this play, the central symbol is the offer of beauty by the gods Madana and Vasanta for a
span of a year. What is more remarkable is that there is no obvious exhibition of this symbol,
which grows so naturally and spontaneously out of the story that is nor noticed as a symbol in
the beginning at all.
The play is a journey from the physical attraction to the spiritual love and Chitra acts
as a bridge between two feelings. She gets infatuated towards the heroic splendor of Arjuna;
when Arjuna offers his love to Chitra and breaks his vow of celibacy for the sake of her
physical charm, she is not thrilled with joy. As days pass on, she becomes gradually stronger
and says:
Whom do you seek in these dark eyes, in these milk white arms, if you ready
to pay for her the price of your probity? Not my true self, I know. Surely this
cannot be loved; this is not man‟s highest to woman! Alas, that this frail
disguise, the body should make one blind to the light of deathless spirit! Yes,
now indeed, I know, Arjuna, the frame of your heroic manhood is false.
(1.11).
Before parting from Chitra, Arjuna accepts her in bliss when she casts on him a
tranquilizing spell. Chitra becomes all the more beautiful because she has known love and
because she is now a prospective mother.
The genesis of the play Chitra is significant. Once observing is early April the burst
blossoming in the trees, Tagore seems to have mused whether a woman would not look upon
her physical beauty as an enemy since it was apt, inspite of its transience, to engross the lover
to the point of ignoring the more enduring qualities of the mind and the soul. The beauty and
fragrance are the ultimate result. Bit men and woman are more than reproductive
mechanisms. They have grown a spiritual dimension. Hence to subsist or dies with its own
surfeit or turns to nausea or disgust instead.
Love and death are mindless in their choice of victims. They are impartial. Tagore is
seized by the idea that love is too long centered in the physical. He wishes to incarnate it in a
drama presenting the evolution of human love from the physical to the spiritual. He also finds
a suitable story from The Mahabharata.
In an article that he contributed to the Mysore University Magazine, J.C.Rollo
expressed the following idea:
Here you have particular people: Arjuna and Chitra …. Are every man, every
woman, and the problems facing them is that of wives and husbands from the
beginning to the end of time (Iyengar: 49).
The further point that Rollo tries to make is that Tagore‟s play presents a point of
view that is false because if sets up life as being above and also because it implies woman‟s
subordinate position to man. Real intension of Tagore is not to picture woman as a
subordinate of man. Tagore must have been aware that the rope which binds us all permits no
master slave relationship; it permits only mutual companionship.
The whole point of the play is that youth itself (with its freshness, strength and
beauty) is a student spring time miracle for it comes as it were suddenly, and fades away as
suddenly, as unaccountably. Chitra expresses Tagore‟s concept of love kin its varied aspects.
The play conveys the message that satisfaction of physical love should not be sought through
false and hypocritical means.
Youth and beauty are two important aspects on which love is built. It is “Nature‟s
trick” to bring about results, but hen man has learnt through the ages of his civilized existence
to improve upon, so soften, and to transcend this mere “trick‟ and make it the means of a
more integral and durable union that lasts a whole life time, and even overflows from
generation to generation. Because men and woman have evolved subtle methods of
seduction, assuming graces and powers far in excess of normality, there is also the risk of
greater disappointment, revulsion or disgust.
The progress of love is from the sensual to the spiritual. Arjuna‟s austerities fall like
an unwanted cloak when he sees Chitra in her “Frail disguise”- woman‟s body glowing with
the spring of her youth and he thirsts with new-awakened love. But neither Arjuna nor Chitra
is wholly at ease. She conquers her unease by boldly revealing the truth about herself. The
„false‟ woman redeems herself as the true mother-to-be. The sensual is transcended in the
spiritual, and the union is sanctified at lose.
Tagore‟s main purpose in writing the play Chitra seems to be to express his view of
life, religion, philosophy, etc., so, characterization gets only secondary importance. Like
Shakespeare and other great dramatists, he only not allow his characters to speak for
themselves. This play is more in the nature of a lyric. The whole play is surcharged with an
aroma of subtle poetic charm which pervades it from the beginning to the end. For example,
the following sentence illustrates this point: “tonight in its last hour let my beauty flash its
brightest like the final flicker of a dying flame.” (49).
Chitra lends itself to dramatic representation on the stage, in spite of its shortcomings
as a play. Tagore‟s object is to inculcate the lesson that mere physical love is not real love.
Physical love is no doubt an adjunct for the fulfillment of love. On the other hand, it is divine
and it calls for mutual understanding and adjustment between the lovers.
Tagore also shows himself an adept in the art of adapting the ancient puranic themes
to suit his views. The play is really a wonderful piece of work, as beautiful in its thought as in
its expression. Thus Chitra is a both a lyric and a play.
The Post Office (1912) was written during what is known as the Gitanjali period. The
Post Office achieved next only to Gitanjali, great popularity in the west. The critics naturally
got busy discovering profound meaning in the play, interpreting every bit of it as something
pregnant with significance.
The Post Office has a tighter structural unity and its meaning comes to us like a deep
dream of peace. Tagore is at his best he deals with children. A child is a wonder-world of its
own. The grown-ups usually do not understand the special hopes and fears of children. But
Tagore the child a symbol of the Infinite. And he describes with great tenderness the
„Childish‟ joys and anxieties for he has spent most of his days during the younger days at the
servants quarters. Sitting at the window, he would gaze like his own Amal in The Post Office.
In stories like the Cabuliwallah and Home Coming and poems like The Crescent Moon he has
given us moving pictures of children.
The symbolism in The Post Office is delicate and interpreted in more ways. Tagore is
however, reported to have rejected the suggestion that the play is symbolic. To him the
incidents in the play are very concrete.
In the play The Post Office, Tagore conveys the soul‟s longing for freedom. It is the
hope of freedom, the dream of wandering in wide open spaces that sustains Amal. Here,
Tagore interprets freedom as the inner condition of calmness rather than mere absence of
restraint. In Tagors‟s plays, in general, we find that a fascination for the mysterious and
unpredictable aspect of life goes hand in hand with deep concern for the crucial practical
problems faced by humanity. In the play The Post Office, Tagore is at his best as he deals
about a child Amal and his feelings of loneliness and his hope for freedom.
Tagore in his personal life has to face shocks and bereavement that would have
broken down any man. His misfortunes multiplied and he lost his daughter and son. These
bows are severe and left their traces in his poems. The feeling of loneliness and gloom with
which he tries to live down through prayer and meditation cast their shadow on
„Remembrance‟ and „Child‟. It is obvious that the loss of his daughter is the background.
Psychology of the child, its innocent joys, pointless curiosity, its sense of wonder, its
hankering for the unknown and the remote, are revealed in many of his poems. The sick boy
represents Tagore‟s boyhood and his own experience of loneliness and worldliness. The boy,
who is confined to the house, forgets his sickness with the help of his fertile imagination. He
is unlike any normal child, who would, at such a condition, indulge in self, pity. He faces his
end boldly.
In this symbolical drama, we are rarely cut off from the beauties of the open air, and if
a hidden truth reveals itself, it does so, not through abnormal instincts and emotions but
through the normal yearning of a child for the world stretching beyond his window.
It may also be pointed out in conclusion that The Post Office as well as the other
symbolic plays of Tagore acquires a contemporaneous relevancy when we come back to the
reading of the play from the vantage point of the recent Abstract Theatre. It is not a far-
fetched supposition to say that The Post Office can be fruitfully discussed in comparison with
a Nigerian play like Wole Soyinka‟s The Road or an American play like Edward Albee‟s
Tiny Alice.
Amal is just a nice boy, with all the impulses and attitudes which Tagore considered
as healthy and creative. He is imaginative, adventurous, innocent, and spontaneous in his
responses, gentle, loving, naturally sympathetic, observant, and full of hunger for experience.
His imaginative identification with things around is so intense that he wants to be and do so
many things.
Amal‟s desires and fancies arise spontaneously out of the situations that he
encounters, the characters and the situations may be representative and suggestive, radiating
meaning other than the surface one , but one can‟t be definite about them.
The King symbolizes the Almighty God. The King‟s physician brings the message of
emancipation through death and thus completes the symbolical meaning of the play.
The Post Office is one of the most frequently performed on the stage in many
countries. Apart from the for that it is a very moving little piece, the dramatic interest is kept
alive throughout. After a performance of the play in London, the Irish poet Yeats had
commented: “The play conveys and emotion of gentleness and peace.” (Ghose: 63) Indeed in
spite of Amal‟s silent suffering, the dominant mood in the play is tranquility.
We might say that The Post Office is essentially a naturalistic play with a number of
symbolic overtones. The play is successful, because the naturalistic level is maintained
throughout-even in the last scene in which there is “Fantasy”. The play‟s roots are essentially
in actuality, in life, and it is because of this, it has attained greatness. This is not to deny that
there are many hidden meanings as suggested by the critics of Tagore, but the point of
analysis has been to assert its basic, realistic level and leave the play to radiate its meanings
to readers according to their sensibility and spiritual kinship with the philosophy of Tagore.
Chandalika is not a voice against untochability rather a story of Prakriti‟s spiritual
rebirth, „her redemption,‟ „a message of liberation‟ and the second coming of Lord Buddha(in
the name of „Ananda;.) her wild physical desire surrenders before Ananda resplendent with
the light of truth; perhaps Tagore wants to highlight the enigmatic character of woman, the
character of being all-dominating and over possessive to devour all that stands before her,
precisely, her excessive materialistic approach that ultimately fails before spiritual
manifestations. Tagore presents a psychological study of a young woman who suffer on
account of her vanity and self-consciousness.
In Chandalika the central operative symbol is that of „giving‟. Prakriti the Chandals
girl gives water to Ananda. Ananda gives her the awareness of self, a new birth. Prakriti, in
turn, longs to give herself (her ego-bound physical self) to Ananda; but this kind of giving
goes with possession. Prakriti‟s mother offers to give her life for the sake of her daughter by
under taking to work the magic spell which would drag Ananda to Prakriti. Though
sympathy, pity and love, through her identification with Ananda‟s suffering, Prakriti realizes
that after all this what she had desired to give him (i.e., her physical self) is nothing but her
„Wretched self‟. The play ends with three different „giving‟: Prakriti gives Ananda his
freedom; Ananda gives her deliverance, and a spiritual rebirth which is superior to the „ego-
birth that he had given her earlier‟.
Prakriti‟s mother gives her life itself; her sacrifice helps her to bring about the
spiritual union (which is but mutual giving of „Mukti‟) of Prakriti and Ananda. Some of the
important contributory symbols are: (a) Water-water as a concrete symbol is associated with
Prakriti‟s rebirth; and the water image (as language) is used in a variety of contexts with a
variety of meanings; (b). The magic spell-the spell of the Earth (of Matter), the ancient spell,
„as old as life itself,‟ which drags Ananda (Pursha, Spirit) to Prakriti (Matter); The Magic
Mirror-symbolic of Prakriti‟s gradual self-realization, her „seeing‟ the truth and also her
gradual identification with Ananda (her self-realization taking place through her
identification with Ananda: a mirror normally reflects one‟s self, and here the magic mirror
reflects Ananda).
In Chandalika, too, as in Chitra the symbols are organically connected with the theme
and the story, and the symbolic level never clashes with the surface poetic-realistic level. In
both Chitra and Chandalika, the two levels are so perfectly fused that one naturally feels that
the conception of these plays must have been the outcome of a dynamic process of
imagination, a kind of creative churning that brings forth feminine, living symbols.
The greatness of Chandalika lies in the fact that within a short span, the writer is able
to embody so many higher ideals which make human life dignified and distinguished. True
love wins. Tagore, we have seen, experimented with symbolism in a number of ways, varying
between dogged, self-conscious, manipulation, spontaneous and unconscious. His plays The
Post Office, Chitra and Chandalika have experimented with the interaction of symbols and
their contents, and the contexts were traditional, mythological, naturalistic, completely self-
created, social-political and metaphysical. We have found that Tagore was successful when
he lodged his symbols in traditional or mythological contexts and when he allowed them to
grow out of a naturalistic context. Tagore‟s manifold experimentation indicates that his
symbolism always goes with a certain amount of palpable design; it is successfully used in an
apparent mode of expression and also to illustrate a proposition or to drive a point home. It
also medicates that when his symbolism is genuine and mature, as in Chitra, The Post Office,
and Chandalika, it turns the works into magic mirrors which offer significant heights into
human life along with profound aesthetic experiences.
Tagore‟s claim to eminence as a playwright consists in the large number and
versatility of his drama, in their undisputed literary excellence, in their suitability for
successful presentation of the stage and last but not least in the vision of a higher life that he
presents in them. The provide a rich feast to the eye, ear, mind heart and soul.
Works Cited:
Chakravarthy, B.C. Rabindranath Tagore: His mind and Art. New
Delhi: Young India Publications, 1987. Print
Chaubey, Basistha. “Symbolism in The Post Office.”The Commonwealth
Review. Vol.13, No.1, (n.d), 48-51. Print
Choudhuri, Indra Nath. Comparative Indian Literature: Some Perspectives.
New Delhi: Sterling Publishers, 1992. Print
Dahibhate, Abha. “Realization of Purutharthas in Girish Karnad‟s The Fire
and Rain”. The Quest 15.1 (June 2001): 70-73. Print
Desai, S.K. Symbolism in Tagore’s Plays: Critical Essay’s on Indian Writing
in English. Third Volume. Naik, M.K, S.K, Desai and G.S. Amur (Eds.),
Madras, Macmillian Company of India Ltd., 1968.
Edward, et al. The Literature of India: An Introducion. Chicago: University
Of Chicago Press, 1974. Print
Frye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism: 20th
Century Literary Criticism. Ed.
David Lodge. London: Longman, 1972. Print
Iyengar, K.R.S. Indo-Anglian Literature, Bombay: International Book
House, 1943. Print
… Indian Writing in English. Bombay: Asia Publishing House, 1973. Print
…. “The Post Office’: Rabindranath Tagore: A Critical
Introduction. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers Private Ltd., 1965. Print
Joshi, N and B. Shymala Rao. Studies in Indo-Anglian Literature. Bareilley:
Prakash Book Depot, 1987. Print
Krishnanand and Shymala Rao. “Tagore: The Dramatist”. Studies in Indo
Anglian Literature. Bareilley: Prakash Book Depot, 1987. Print
Kripalani, Krishna. Rabindranth Tagore: A Biography. New York: Grove
Press, 1962. Print
Naik, M.K and S. Mokashi Punewkar. “The Achievement of Indian Drama
in English”. Perspectives on Indian Drama in English. New Delhi: Oxford
UniversityPress, 1977. Print
… “Towards an Aesthetic of Indian English Literature”. Studies in
Indian English Literature. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers, 1987. Print
Pandya, Ketki. N. Tagore’s Chitra and Aurobindo’s Savitri: A Comparative
Study. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers & Distributers, 2004. Print
Preminger Alex. Ed. Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics. Princeton:
Princeton University Press (Enlarged edition) 1973. Print
Rangan, V. “A Quest for Beauty and Truth: Synge‟s Desire of Sorrows and
Tagore‟s Chitra”. Indian Scholor, Vol 11, No 1, (January 1989): 11-20. Print
Rao, Madhu Sudana. K.I. “Symbolism in The Post Office.” The Two-fold
Voice: Essays on Indian Writing in English. Raghavacharyulu D.V.K
(Ed.),Vijayavada: Navodaya Publishers, 1971. Print
Rao, Rama K.V. Symbolism in Three plays of Tagore – Mukta-Dhara,
Natir Puja Chandalika. Triveni. Vol.53, No.4. (Jan-Mar, 1985) 25-31. Print
Reddy, P. Bayapa. “Tagore‟s The Post Office”: A Thematic Study”. Triveni.
Vol 54, No 1. (Apr-Jan 1985):87-91. Print
Rhys, Ernest. Rabindranath Tagore: A Biographical Study. London:
Macmillan, 1917. Print
Rollo, R.C. R.N.Tagore: A Critical Introduction. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers,
1987. Print
Rukhaiyar, U.S.Tagore‟s “The Post Office: A Study in Symbolism”.
The Common Wealth Review, Vol. 13, No.1, 59-68. Print
Rukhaiyar, U.S. “Symbolism in Tagore‟s Play: The Post Office”. Cyber
Literature. Vol 11 &12, 1&2 (Jun-Dec 2003) 54-63. Print
Saranyal, Hirankumar. “The Plays of Rabindrath Tagore”. A Centenary
Volume. New Delhi; Sahitya Akademi, 1986. 233-242. Print
Singh, Natwar K. Ed. E.M.Forster – A Tribute. Delhi: Clarion, 1969. Print
Tagore, Rabindranath. Reminiscences. Madras: Macmillan, 1944. Print
. . .The Religion of Man. London: Unwin Publsihers, 1988. Print
…Three Plays. New Delhi, Oxford University Press, 1975. Print
…The Post Office. New Delhi: Macmillan Publishers, 1986. Print
Thompson, Edward. Rabindranath Tagore: Poet and Dramatist. London:
Oxford University Press, 1948. Print
…. Rabindranath Tagore. His Life and Work. Calcutta: Y.M.C.A. publishing
House, 1921. Print
Tripathi, Savitri. “Rabindranath Tagore: An Ascetic against Avidya: A
Study of his plays: The King of the Dark Chamber and The Post
Office.” The Commonwealth Review. Vol13, No1.52-58. Print
Yada, Saryug. “Indian English Drama: Traditional and Achievement”.
Indian English Drama – Critical Perspective. Ed. Jayadispsinha K.