Quiescent Disks in the Early Universe

Post on 24-Feb-2016

36 views 1 download

description

Quiescent Disks in the Early Universe. Elizabeth J. McGrath, Aurora Y. Kesseli , Arjen van der Wel , Eric Bell, Guillermo Barro and the CANDELS Collaboration. Formation of the Red Sequence. Red sequence in place at z~2 Growth in quiescent population (red symbols) is dramatic since z~2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Quiescent Disks in the Early Universe

Elizabeth J. McGrath, Aurora Y. Kesseli,

Arjen van der Wel, Eric Bell, Guillermo Barro and the CANDELS Collaboration

QUIESCENT DISKS IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE

• Red sequence in place at z~2

• Growth in quiescent population (red symbols) is dramatic since z~2

• Galaxies evolve from mostly low Sersic index (open symbols) to higher Sersic (filled symbols)

FORMATION OF THE RED SEQUENCE

Bell et al. (2012)

• Strongest correlation is between Sersic index and quenched fraction for all redshift ranges.

• High Sersic = bulge dominated (?)• Consistent with merger formation scenario

SEARCH FOR A QUENCHING PARAMETER

Bell et al. (2012)

• Previous studies have found strong evidence for massive, quiescent disks, even without large central bulges (including spectroscopic confirmation of their quiescence):

QUIESCENT DISKS

McGrath et al. (2007, 2008)

n=1.49

z=1.412

ACS NIC2 Model Residuals

CANDELS

• Large area near-IR WFC3 survey.

• Particularly well-suited to the study of quenched or “passive” galaxies at z~2 that are essentially invisible at shorter, rest-frame UV wavelengths.

ACS WFC3

z = 1.6 v z Y J H

DETAILED MORPHOLOGY STUDIES

• Real galaxies aren’t as simple as pure disks or pure ellipticals.

• By convention, Sersic n<2.5 = disk-like n>2.5 = spheroidal

• With good data we can decompose an image of a galaxy into its subcomponents

POINT SPREAD FUNCTION

• “Hybrid” PSF• Stacked stars

within 2.5”• Central and

outermost pixels replaced with TinyTim model

• Drizzled in same manner as dataAvailable at

candels.ucolick.org

or by email: emcgrath@colby.edu

UVJ SELECTION OF QUIESCENT GALAXIES AT Z > 1

a la Labbé et al. (2005); Wuyts et al. (2007); Williams et al. (2009)

GOODS-S fromCANDELS

QUIESCENT DISKS

z = 1.29n = 4.0

z = 1.68n = 2.4

z = 1.69n = 1.9

z = 1.61n = 2.6

z = 0.90n = 2.6

• Closer inspection of “high-Sersic”, massive, quiescent galaxies has revealed a number of disk-dominated galaxies.

B/T = 0.30 B/T = 0.25 B/T = 0.25 B/T = 0.33 B/T = 0.19

• Results from Bruce et al. (2014) in the UDS + COSMOS:• 1<z<3, M*>1011 Msun

HOW COMMON ARE THESE QUIESCENT DISKS?

Bruce et al. (2014)

29% of all quiescent galaxies have B/T < 0.5.

• Expanding the sample with CANDELS/ GOODS-S:• Defined to be

disks if B/T < 0.5

• Redshift bins spaced equally in time.

HOW COMMON ARE QUIESCENT DISKS?

30% are disk-dominated at z~2

Quiescent galaxies

with M > 1010 Mo

EJM, Kesseli, et al., in prep.

10 5 4 3

Time (Gyr)

SUMMARY

• A significant fraction of quenched galaxies at high-z appear to be disk dominated.

• Spheroid formation may not be the trigger that quenches star-formation, but just an end result.

• (In)consistent with merger paradigm? • Compare number density of quiescent disks to

predictions from SAMs (e.g., Somerville et al. mock galaxy catalogs with B/T ratios).

• In-situ vs. ex-situ processes for star-formation quenching? • disk instabilities

• environment (e.g., halo quenching)