Post on 11-Jan-2016
Quality Audit Toolfor Managing Social Performance
The purpose of Quality Audit Tool
• Diagnosis of SPM quality• How effective are the internal processes in
reaching social objectives?status: what processes are (not) in place?effectiveness (do they serve their purpose?)
• What are the necessary actions to improve social performance?identifying necessary actionsprioritizing activities
MFC Quality Audit Tool 3
QAT Uses for MFI Manager
• Are you on track?• SPM system strengths• SPM system weakness• Prioritized improvement, • SPM institutionalization step by step• Staff buy-in and understanding of SPM• Progress monitoring• Preparation for social rating
QAT Benefits for Various Stakeholders
• MFI Managers:–Clear current picture of SPM systems quality–Good basis for effective improving–Allows improving before future social rating
• MFI staff–Better understanding of how their tasks fit into social goals and strategy
SP dimensions assessed by QAT
1. Intent and design2. Social Performance information system3. Management system
MFC Quality Audit Tool 5
SP dimensions assessed by QAT
1. Intent and designMission translationSocial goals and objectives (outreach, service, change)SR to clients, staff, communities, environment& gender aware policiesSystems for developing coherent strategy
2. Social Performance information system3. Management system
MFC Quality Audit Tool 6
SP dimensions assessed by QAT
1. Intent and design2. Social Performance information system3. Management system
MFC Quality Audit Tool 7
SP dimensions assessed by QAT
1. Intent and design2. Social Performance information system
Operations and marketing: mechanism for collecting clients feedbackMarketing, HR, Research, MIS, internal audit: data reliabilityMarketing, operations: data analysis and reporting
3. Management system
MFC Quality Audit Tool 8
SP dimensions assessed by QAT
1. Intent and design2. Social Performance information system3. Management system
MFC Quality Audit Tool 9
SP dimensions assessed by QAT
1. Intent and design2. Social Performance information system3. Management system
Management practice: data use, performance monitoringDecision making at strategic and operational levelGovernance, leadershipInternal communicationHR: Staff Incentive System; recruitment and trainingChange management capabilities
MFC Quality Audit Tool 10
MFC Quality Audit Tool 13
4 Steps in QAT
• ED• Senior management (Finance, Operations, HR, Marketing, )
• Board• Senior management• Internal auditor• MIS staff• Research staff• Regional level• Branch level• LO• Clients
• All
0,5 day 2 - 3 days1-2 days 0,5 day 1 day
Preparation
Gap analysis
Follow upinterviews
Audit panel
Final report
Analysis& draft report
1 day
Sta
ff p
art
icip
ati
ng
Total time: from 6 up to 8 days
MFIs Implementing QAT Worldwide
• ECA regionAgroInvest and MDF, SerbiaAregak, ArmeniaFinDev, AzerCredit and Viator, AzerbaijanHorizonti and Moznosti, MacedoniaPartner and Zene za Zene, Bosnia and Herzegovina
• EthiopiaBuusaa Gonofaa
• The PhilippinesASHI, CARD, People's Bank of Caraga
• MENA RegionTamweelcom and DEF, JordanARDI and AMOS, MoroccoAdan, YemenAmeen & Al Majmoua, LebanonABA & FMF, Egypt
MFC Quality Audit Tool 14