Post on 30-Oct-2014
description
Cranfield UniversityPGCLTAHEModule 1: Scholarship and Philosophy of
Learning and Teaching in Higher Education
February 2011
George Roberts, PhDOxford Brookes University
http://www.slideshare.net/georgeroberts/philosophy-of-higher-education
Purpose of the day
To analyse and reflect critically on Higher Education policy and practice and the explanatory frameworks that underpin policy and practice
Consider the “big picture”
The bits that aren’t in the “papers”ReflectionPeer reviewThe qualitative research agenda
Keep getting to know each other: peer group development!
IntroductionsIntroduce yourself and briefly say
which School/Service you are with, what you teach or how you support
learning
Discussdo you have a mentor? (Handbook p. 3)what’s a mentor?
Baseline profile (33)Learning Agreement (34)
Modular structure
Work Plan/Targets
Activity: ABCD 1Asset based community development
(ABCD)
Affective recall
Describe a time and a place in your life before you came to this job when you felt really energized and creative. Describe that situation to your partner
ABCD22 pictures
http://www.artsreview.co.za/fashion/2009/03/19/fuck-the-rainbow-nation-coz-94-changed-fokol-blackwash/
ActivityIn pairs/threes, with chart paper…
What [the heck] is “Philosophy of Higher Education”?Discuss, and on the chart paper write
one idea, that, for you, is central to this question
Agenda
http://www.xmind.net/share/georgeroberts/xmind-768070/
Agenda
Aims and intended outcomesIntended Learning Outcomes (Handbook p. 7)
Articulate a critical and scholarly review of theories of higher education and its purposes Criticality (ILO 1)
Contribute to the development of a scholarly & critical understanding of Higher Education in society
Assess the relevance of these philosophies and mechanisms in context Globalisation (ILO 2)
Apply your analysis of discourses of education and power to the sustainability of social order attributes and the institutions of society
Access (ILO 2) Apply a richer understanding of your role in higher education to the improvement
of learning for your students, yourself, your discipline and institution(s) Responsibility (ILO 2)
Explore the contingencies of “truth” as it underlies disciplinary (experimental) methods
Curricula (ILO 2) Explain and apply the concept of a hidden curriculum to objective-led learning,
teaching and assessment (and management)
Demonstrate commitment to core professional values of scholarship, development of learning communities, CPD and evaluation Community (ILO 3)
Interpret and actualise values in practice
Card sort: Issues and drivers At your table
1. Individually: sort the cards in order of the things that most influence your role
2. Choose your top 3 and briefly explain to your colleagues
3. Together: Each table choose their top 2
4. Explain to the room
BREAK
History of Ideas“purpose”
Some peopleInstitutions of society
Purpose of Higher EducationAcademic identity
Institutions of societyEstates
Production
Reproduction
Hidden curricular issues
Overt curriculum of the early modern age “3 Rs”: reading, ‘riting and ‘rithmatic.
Reproduction of these cultural goods, universal literacy and numeracy, would benefit both the individual as well as society.
Today’s overt curriculumFlexibility, community/team work,
personalisation (particularly in the ICT sense)
Covert curriculum: education as politics
Industrial era covert curriculum:Punctuality, tolerance of repetition,
subordination
Post industrial “Knowledge Economy” covert curriculumPiecework, precarity, competitionNormalisationSurveillance
Activity: let’s get criticalUniversities are supposed by the Charter [for Higher
Education, 1993] to "deliver" a "service", namely higher education to "customers", in two divisions, firstly students, and secondly business which "buys" both education and the results of commissioned research. The "delivery" to students is by way of "teaching" or "effective management of ... learning", in "courses", all of which have "aims and structures" clearly described in advance, and any of which include "transferrable skills like problem solving and effective communication". The standards of these providers of teaching are guaranteed by "quality assurance systems" which will be "regularly audited" and will enable applicants to discover “… how well different universities and colleges are performing".
Each of these phrases within quotation marks, and all of them cumulatively betray a conception of higher education which is not only not that of the university, but is actively hostile to the university.
Maskell, D. & Robinson, I. (2001). The new idea of a university. London: Haven Books.
What’s wrong with?DeliverServiceCustomerBuysTeachingEffective management of learningCoursesAims and structuresTransferrable skills like problem solving and
effective communicationQuality assurance systemsRegularly auditedWill enable applicants to discover how well
different universities and colleges are performing
LUNCH
Learning Theory“difference”
Social and biological bases of cognition-isms and –ologies
DifferenceCriticality
Competence
That’s all very well in practice,
but how does it work in theory?
Activity
We’ve had a typology, but
What’s theory for you?
Theory
Systematic codification or abstraction of:• Accumulated observations ( or assertions)• Beliefs
Conceptual framework• Model
An attempt to answer the question, “Why...?”
An approach or a perspective, e.g.:• Positivist• Socio-cultural
See De-localized Production of Scientific Knowledge. (2007, October 7). . Retrieved from http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/mediaberkman/2007/09/21/de-localized-production-of-scientific-knowledge-2/
There is difference
what do you do with it?- as a teacher- as a researcher- as an academic
Biological bases of cognitionTraining is intimately connected with and dependent
on the human cognitive system. Learning means that the cognitive system acquires information and stores it for future use. If these processes do not occur properly, then the learners will not initially acquire the information, and even if they do… the information will not be utilised and behaviour modified.
It does not matter if the objective is learning new information (e.g., compliance regulations, product specifications, etc.), acquiring new skills …, or knowledge sharing … the processes of acquiring, storing and applying the information are critical.
See, e.g. Cognitive Consultants International (CCI) http://cognitiveconsultantsinternational.com/index.php?siteID=2
Philosophical bases of knowledgeMost academics - in the humanities and social
sciences, particularly - come at their subject these days from a relativist perspective: knowledge is "in here"; there is no knowledge without the knower; knowledge is "constructed" in cultural contexts; knowledge is not "given" or "out there". There is no "absolute truth".
This position is quite different from the classical approach: knowledge is "out there"; the "laws of nature" are independent from the mind of the investigator; there is "truth" to be discovered. This approach depends on the "independent, objective observer", who can stand aside from the observed phenomenon and form an unbiased view.
This classical approach is the traditional position of many scientists, as well the commonsense view of how knowledge is produced, which (according to Scollon) is held by an international public discourse of commerce and government. (see Scollon 2003: 71)
2 orientations towards acquiring knowledge& … 2 functions of theory
deductivefrom theory to observation
predictive
inductivefrom observation to theory
explanatoryWhat about abductionRetroduction
another orientation towards acquiring knowledge
& … another function of theory
holistic
generative
So… theory is:
predictive
explanatory
generative
and, which reminds me… theory is:
nomotheticoops!
typicalOr typifying
Or typologising
So, we have a typology of theory…
a theory of theoryexplanatory
predictive
generative
typical
And the last bit?
Falsifiable
Theory vs.. ideology:
Ideology may well be predictive and explanatory, but instead of generative it is restrictive, instead of typical it is normalising and instead of falsifiable it is enforced. (Popper)
So, we have a (new) typology of theory…
a theory of theory
explanatory
predictive
generative
typical
falsifiable
Stephen Brookfield’s four “critical reflective lenses”
• our “autobiography as teachers and
learners”, i.e. through our own eyes• through our students eyes• through our colleagues’ experience and
peer review• through the theoretical literature
Theoretical literature helps us to name
our practice and to find that it is not
idiosyncratic
... learning can be enhanced through: a consideration of the context and experience of others, familiarity with received wisdom, reflection on these, and the use of the first hand experience of the learner.
[however]
Discussions of reflection in learning often emphasise the first hand experience of the learner rather than the role of formal theory, the importance of the broader social context and the experience of others
(Dyke 2006)
Reflective practice?
A theory of identity…?
Academic identityDisciplinarity as a dimension of
diversity in higher education, showing an understanding of broad differences in epistemologies
Disciplinarity may affect
learning approachescurriculum outcomescurrent challengeslearner characteristics…
Discipline… is a type of power, a modality for its exercise, comprising a whole set of instruments, techniques, procedures, levels of application, targets… And it may be taken over… by institutions that use it as an essential instrument for a particular end (schools, hospitals)…
(Foucault, 1977, p. 215)
1
VAK Questionnaire
Activities
2
Think of something you have learned.
How did you learn this? What processes did you go through? What did you do to learn?
BREAK
LinearBeetham
CyclicalKolbLaurillard
HierarchicalBloomSalmon
Models
Kolb’s Learning Cycle
experiencing
reflecting
thinking
planning
Levels of learning: Bloom
knowledge
comprehension
application
analysis
synthesis
evaluation
ATHERTON J S (2005) Learning and Teaching: Bloom's taxonomy [On-line] UK: Available: http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/bloomtax.htm
Sequence & Stance
Sequence Where are you in the course? Is it
the first week or the 8th week? Have groups been used in other
settings? Do people know one another yet?
What is the interactional function of groupwork (as opposed to the instrumental or regulatory or heuristic functions?)
Maxims of stance (Scollon 1998) Channel Relationship Topic
e-Tivity Sequence
(Salmon)
M-levelMasters degrees, PG Certificates and PG Diplomas i. systematic understanding of knowledge, and critical
awareness of current problems and/or new insights, much of which is at, or informed by, the forefront of their academic discipline, field of study, or area of professional practice;
ii. comprehensive understanding of techniques applicable to their own research or advanced scholarship;
iii. originality in the application of knowledge, together with a practical understanding of how established techniques of research and enquiry are used to create and interpret knowledge in the discipline;
iv. conceptual understanding that enables the student: to evaluate critically current research and advanced
scholarship in the discipline; and to evaluate methodologies and develop critiques of them and,
where appropriate, to propose new hypotheses.
Quality assurance agency for higher education (QAA) http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/FHEQ/EWNI/#framework
ValuesCore values
Respect for learnersCommitment to scholarshipDeveloping learning communitiesEncouraging participation in
higher educationCommitment to personal CPD
Higher Education Academy
Professional Standards Framework
Higher Education PolicyLevels of analysis
DriversOutcomes
Pragmatics
Policy: the Big Picture
GlobalisationLiberalisationParticipationInnovation
Education and training policy replaces industrial policy as the means by which governments seek to make regions economically competitive
Critical reflection“Reflection becomes critical when it
has two distinct purposes:
… to understand how considerations of power undergird, frame and distort educational processes and interactions.
… to question … assumptions and practices that seem to make our teaching lives easier but actually work against our long-term interests.”
Brookfield (2005: 8)
Looking forwardWorkshop programme
Constructive alignment
Course, Module, Lesson Design
Teaching Practice
Assessment
Wrap-upQuestions?
Academics anonymous
Thank youGeorge Roberts, PhD
Senior Lecturer, Educational DevelopmentOCSLD
Wheatley CampusOxford Brookes University
Oxford, OX33 1HX
groberts@brookes.ac.ukhttp://www.google.com/profiles/georgebroberts
http://www.slideshare.net/georgeroberts/philosophy-of-higher-education