Project Update 4-15-2009 Joe Featherall Jeffrey Ryan Christopher Crowley.

Post on 24-Dec-2015

215 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of Project Update 4-15-2009 Joe Featherall Jeffrey Ryan Christopher Crowley.

R10221 BAJA SAE

ROADMAPPING

Project Update 4-15-2009

Joe FeatherallJeffrey Ryan Christopher Crowley

Project InformationProject Name 3 Projects To be

Determined

Roadmap Number R10221

Project Family RIT Baja SAE Roadmap

Track Automotive Engineering

Start Term 2009-1

End Term 2011-3

Faculty Guide Dr. Nye

Faculty Consultant Professor Deminco

Primary Customer RIT Baja SAE

Baja SAE Competition

RIT BAJA SAE UNVEILING 2009

Off-road Vehicle Design Competition

Design, Build, Test Off-road Vehicle

3 Yearly competition 1 Amphibious

Competition Compete in Areas:

Design Performance Design Presentation

Phase 0: Mission

Increase the overall competitiveness of the RIT Baja SAE Team

Form a mutually beneficial relationship between the RIT Baja SAE Team and the KGCOE MSD Program

Roadmap the development of cutting edge technologies that will provide an engaging learning experience and benefit the University’s SAE Teams.

Phase 0: Primary Opportunities

Leadership in Automotive Innovation Long Term Project Goals and Focus Synergizing Academic and Extracurricular

Efforts Benefit from Outside Perspectives Benefit from Multidisciplinary Designs Leveraging Professionalism and formality

of Senior design process

Phase 0: Secondary Opportunities

Creating Technologies beneficial to other SAE Teams

Aligning with current industry push in drive system development

Aligning with evolution towards integrated electronic controls

Phase 0: Stakeholders

Road mapping

Group

KGCOE

Dr. Nye

Marty Gordon (Baja

Advisor)

Baja SAE Team

Professor Deminco

SAE Competitio

n

Competitive Goals Educational

Goals

Phase .5: Former StrategyFa

ilur

e

Consistent Low Risk Mediocre Performance

4130 Steel Design

Failu

re

6061 Aluminum Design

2008All previous years

2009Carbon Fiber Design

Stage .75 : Set Based Concurrent Methodology

Reliable, Low Risk

Medium Risk and Innovation

High Risk, Highly Innovative, Research and Testing Intensive

Initial Design

RefinementInitial Design

Refinement & Continuation

Rele

as

e

Rele

as

e

Time

Benefits

Incremental Benefit Controlling / Learning from Failure Reduce Wasted Design Effort Increase Reliability Forward Looking Approach Creating Knowledge Base

PHASE 1:BENCHMARKS:

A LITTLE TASTE OF BAJA •Suspension and Traction Event

•Testing durability and capability of suspension and drive systems

University of Southern FloridaCage Cam

Benchmarks: History of Evolution

BAJA COMPETITION VEHICLE IN 2003

BAJA COMPETITION VEHICLE CURRENT

Benchmarks: Current Innovations

COMPOSITE SUSPENSION COMPONENTS

ALUMINUM FABRICATED SUSPENSION COMPONENTS

Benchmarks:Current Innovations

ROLLER CHAIN REDUCTION (LATE 80’S -2005)

CURRENT PLANETARY/SILENT REDUCTION

Benchmarks:Multi-Disciplinary Competition Trend

Demand for Higher Performance Level

More Sophisticated Design

Increasing Complexity

Increasing development time

Increasing Complexity

Benchmarks: RIT Baja SAE DAQ

Driver feedback both real time and stored for later analysis.

The R.I.T. data system includes: 3-axis accelerometers Engine RPM Wheel speed GPS 900MHz wireless (20 km range) SD card slot Clutch, engine and transmission

temperature sensors Brake and throttle position sensors USB connectivity Low oil sensor.

Benchmarks:Auburn University Vehicle and Occupant

Interaction Simulation

Graduate Thesis by Aburn Baja SAE team member

Model structural rigidity and driver reactions in simulated crashes and rollovers

http://graduate.auburn.edu/fpdb/AUETD/Jarmulowicz_Marc_46.pdf

Benchmarks: P08221 FSAE ECU

TEAM P08221 POSTER

Benchmarks: Canadian Engineering Competition

Freshman-Senior Level Design Competition

Attended by many strong Baja SAE Competitors

Focus on: Early Introduction to

Team Oriented Design Process

Design Presentation Extemporaneous

Scientific Debate

Benchmarks: Oregon State Traction Control

BRAKING BASED TRACTION CONTROLOREGON STATE 2007

Championed both Design and Endurance Race segments of the Competition

Developed in OSU MSD Program

Phase 2:Customer Interaction

Customer Meeting 4-5-2009 Created Affinity Diagram with Executive Board

Goals•High Innovation Through Concurrent Design•Long Term Development •Mutual Benefit•Secondary Customer Benefits

Risks•Team Resource Cost•Budgeting •Creating Unproductive Relationship•Customer Needs Not Met•Failure To Communicate

Affinity Diagram Summary

Vehicle Shielding Design Improvement Alternate Material’s Water Suspension Brakes Drive train Testing Team Development

Data Collection Details Driver Feedback Documentation Manufacturing Current Electric Stupid Problems Interpersonal Public Relations

Objective Tree

Become a Competition Leader

Utilize Resources

Resolve Intra-Team

Issues

Gathering and Implementing

Knowledge

Design Improvement

Current System

Refinement

New Technology

Development

Targeted Technologies

Water:Propulsion

Hydrodynamics

Drive train: Efficiency

CVTHybrid

Testing and Data Collection:

DrivelineChassis

Suspension

Active Vehicle Control Systems:Traction Control

Driveline Controls

Expanding Target Market

Center for Integrated Manufacturing Studies

Other SAE Teams Engineering Classes and Lab usage

Power train System Design High Performance Vehicle Dynamics Internal Combustion Engines General Automotive Option Classes

Remaining Schedule

Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11Revisit

Technical Support Team Returns Breakout

Reconvene and work on paths Presenting

Revisit AdvisingMeet with team Executive board

Work on individual Paths

Presentation building

Address Team Concerns

Gathering Team input

Creating Video Resources

Team leaves 4-14-2009

Solidification of Technologies

Hammer Down

on Roadmap

Phase 3 Phase 4 Firing Squad

Identified Risks

Interfacing SD Team with Baja Team Having Senior Design Team understand design

task well without significant involvement of team.

Culture and Thinking Baja Team relies heavily on short term design

cycle Cost Benefit Perception of the Team

Moving Forward

Thus Far, Focus has been on Establishing needs, contacts, and mitigating team boundaries.

Meet with team to revue details of upcoming competition

Future focus is to be on detailed definitions of projects and Project Readiness Packages

Contact Previous Baja Affiliate Road mapping group