Post on 31-Mar-2016
description
INSTITUTE FOR INNOVATION AND GOVERNANCE STUDIES
IGS
FOUrTh ANNUAl CONFErENCE OF ThE SOCIETy FOr ThE STUDy OF NANOSCIENCE AND EmErGING TEChNOlOGIESOctOber 22-25, 2012
3
Welcome
It is a great pleasure and privilege for me to welcome you to the fourth annual conference of the Society for the Study of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies [S.NET]. I have vivid memories of multiple conversations in the mid-00s about the need for a regular venue to discuss nanoscience and other emerging technologies from a broad multiplicity of view points. After an organizing workshop in 2008 at the University of South Carolina, we launched our first full conference in 2009 at the University of Washington, Seattle. With well-attended and successful annual conferences in Darmstadt (2010), Arizona State (2011) and now at Twente (2012), it is clear that S.NET is filling an important need. The themes that this 4th S.NET conference fills are further testimony to the multiplicity of perspectives that come together in our developing understandings of nanoscience and emerging technologies. There are multiple sessions on governance, technology assessment and regulation, but also on public perception and risk analysis, on the transition from a research environment to commercial products. And these sessions move into multiple fields beyond nanotechnology: systems biology, wind and solar energy, neuroscience, DNA sequencing, to name just a few. This conference confirms the importance of the S.NET mission, first articulated at the 2008 workshop, “The Society for the Study of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies (S.NET) is an international organization to promote open intellectual exchange towards the advancement of knowledge and understanding of nanotechnology in society, including its connections with social and other technological developments. S.NET seeks participation from those working within a diversity of communities, viewpoints, and methodologies, and aspires for its intellectual conversation to be informed by this diversity. S.NET seeks interaction with stakeholders and intermediaries, as those interactions contribute to its core mission.” I close extending for myself and the rest of the S.NET Board our thanks to the many people who have made this rich conference at the University of Twente possible. There are—or seem to be—infinitely many details to putting together an international conference, and this job has been done superbly by the local organizing committee of Marianne Boenink, Marcia Clifford, Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung, Anne Dijkstra, Kornelia Konrad and Evelien Rietberg. A program as rich as this comes from the efforts of a dedicated program committee—Marjolein van Asselt, Andrea Bandelli, Michael G. Bennett, Diana Bowman, Suzan Cozzens, Arianna Ferrari, Julia Guivant, Barbara Herr Harthorn, Ismael Rafols, Arie Rip, John Weckert, Fern Wickson and Jan Youtie. And finally we have sponsors to thank, whose contributions have made this conference possible: the Institute for Innovation and Governance Studies (IGS) of the University of Twente; the Institute for Nanotechnology (MESA+) of the University of Twente; the 3TU Center for Ethics and Technology; the Stichting Universiteitsfonds Twente and NanoNextNL. Davis Baird President, S.NET
4
Table of contents
Welcome __________________________________________________________________________________ 3
Table of contents ___________________________________________________________________________ 4
General information _________________________________________________________________________ 5
Information about University of Twente _________________________________________________________ 6
Keynote speakers ___________________________________________________________________________ 8
Program _________________________________________________________________________________ 11
OECD Workshop ___________________________________________________________________________ 20
Public engagement activities exhibition ________________________________________________________ 22
S.NET Nanolab tours ________________________________________________________________________ 22
Local organizing committee __________________________________________________________________ 23
S.NET board members ______________________________________________________________________ 25
List of participants _________________________________________________________________________ 26
Restaurant suggestions _____________________________________________________________________ 30
Map Campus University of Twente ____________________________________________________________ 32
5
General information
Registration desk The conference registration desk will be staffed throughout the conference. Location of the conference registration desk is building Ravelijn (building nr. 10 on the campus map). Meals Reception On the first day, Monday 22 October, there is an opening conference reception including
tapas snacks; building Waaier (building nr. 12 on the campus map) Lunches On Tuesday 23 and Wednesday 24 October there will be a lunch served in building Ravelijn.
On Friday 25 there will be a take away lunch for everybody at building Waaier. Diner Full conference registration includes one conference diner: Tuesday, October 23, 2012:
Tuindorphotel & Restaurant 't Lansink C.T. Storkstraat 18 7553 AR Hengelo www.hotellansink.com
At 18.45 hrs, at building Ravelijn, there will be busses waiting for you to take you to the restaurant. At 23.00 hrs, you will be picked up at the restaurant to take you back to Hotel De Broeierd, Hotel de Drienerburght and to the University of Twente, building Ravelijn.
Internet access In case you need internet access, please ask a login for the UTGuest network at the registration desk! Phone numbers Conference desk +31-53-489 5845/3423 Medical assistance Santar +31-53-489 8030 Hotel Drienerburght +31-53-433 1366 Hotel De Broeierd +31-53-850 6500 Hotel Star Hengelo +31-74-851 6800 Hotel Logica +31-53-433 1366 Hotel ‘t Lansink +31-74-291 0066 Taxi Luttikhuis +31-53-438 8888 Taxi Maxx +31-53-450 0500 BUILDING 12: WAAIER BUILDING 10: RAVELIJN
6
Information about University of Twente University of Twente High tech, human touch. That is the University of Twente. Some 3,300 scientists and other professionals working together on cutting-edge research, innovations with real-world relevance and inspiring education for more than 9,000 students. The enterprising university encourages students to develop an entrepreneurial spirit and is a partner of Kennispark Twente. For more information: http://www.utwente.nl. Institute for Innovation and Governance Studies (IGS) The Institute for Innovation and Governance Studies is one of the priority research institutes of the University of Twente and performs multi-disciplinary research and postgraduate research training in the field of the governance and management of technological and social innovation. In this, issues of co-ordination, steering and the operation of (networks of) institutions in both public and private sectors are core research foci, based on a multi-level, multi-actor perspective. IGS strives to combine scientific excellence with relevance for our stakeholders in the public and private sector. For more information: http://www.utwente.nl/igs. Institute for Nanotechnology (MESA+) MESA+ is one of the largest nanotechnology research institutes in the world, delivering competitive and successful high quality research. It uses a unique structure, which unites scientific disciplines, and builds fruitful international cooperation to excel in science and education. MESA+ has created a perfect habitat for start-ups in the micro- and nano-industry to establish and to mature. MESA+, Institute for Nanotechnology, is part of the University of Twente, having intensive cooperation with various research groups within the University. The institute employs 500 people of which 275 are PhD’s or postdocs. With its NanoLab facilities the institute holds 1250 m2 of cleanroom space and state of the art research equipment. MESA+ has an integral turnover of 45 million euro per year of which 60% is acquired in competition from external sources. The structure within MESA+ supports and facilitates the researchers and stimulates cooperation actively. MESA+ combines the disciplines of physics, electrical engineering, chemistry and mathematics. Internationally appealing research is achieved through this multidisciplinary approach. It is strengthening its international academic and industrial network by fruitful cooperation programs. MESA+ has been the breeding place for more than 40 high-tech start-ups to date. A targeted program for cooperation with small and medium-sized enterprises is specially set up for start-ups. MESA+ offers the use of its extensive facilities and cleanroom space under friendly conditions. Start-ups and MESA+ work intensively together to promote transfer of knowledge. For more information: http://www.utwente.nl/mesaplus Department of Philosophy The Department of Philosophy at the University of Twente is internationally leading in the philosophy and ethics of technology. The research of the department, partly carried out in the context of the 3TU.Center of Excellence for Ethics and Technology, aims at a philosophical analysis of technology and its role in contemporary society, both from an interpretive as well as a normative stance. Ultimately, this philosophical analysis is to contribute to a better role of technology in society, for instance by stimulating better research and design practices, better policies, and better public debates about technology. Distinct features of the research carried out at the department are its focus on the social and cultural consequences of contemporary technology, its naturalistic or “empirically informed” orientation towards technology, its constructivism, and its focus on ICT, biomedical technology and nanotechnology. For more information: http://www.utwente.nl/gw/wijsb/ The Department of Science, Technology, and Policy Studies (STePS), led by Prof. Stefan Kuhlmann, takes the assessment and governance of innovations and emerging technologies as its central theme of teaching and research. STePS considers in particular strategic issues that are multidisciplinary: they involve developments in science, technology, politics and society, as well as interaction between them. Studies conducted within STəPS link analytical and normative perspectives, and consider not only technological innovations but also
7
innovations in governance. Emerging science and technologies as nanotechnology and genomics are important empirical research areas. For further information see http://www.utwente.nl/mb/steps/
8
Keynote speakers Dave Blank. After a research fellowship at Stanford in the group of prof. Malcolm Beasley and prof. Theodore Geballe in 1998, he was appointed as associate professor and programme director on the materials science of interfaces in the MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology at the University of Twente. Since October 2002 he is full professor in Inorganic Materials Science at the same university. From January 1, 2007 he is the Scientific Director of MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente. Dave H.A. Blank’s Inorganic Materials Science research group focuses on growth studies, deposition and structuring techniques, and properties of complex materials, especially oxides. The group developed strategies to build, in an atomic layer-by-layer fashion, inorganic materials by true atomic-deposition control and which thereby exhibit novel and unprecedented properties. His research is based in large part on inventing designer-inorganic (tailor-made) nanomaterials that are prepared by atomic precision. Many of his latest discoveries and contributions have enabled the synthesis of materials, allowing for practical applications in the fabrication of artificial high-temperature superconductors and ferroelectric superlattices. At this present time, many of the structures are being used in the fabrication of two-dimensional electron gasses in the field of interface engineering of complex oxide heterostructures. Nowadays, the field of study is considered as a key research area for future oxide device developments. From November 2010 on he is chairman of the executive Board of the FES programme, called NanoNextNl. In February 2011 he has been appointed as Captain of Science of the Topsector High Tech Systems and Materials by the Dutch Government. In 2011 he was awarded by STW to become Simon Stevin Meester 2011, for his achievements in technical sciences. In 2012 he was appointed Advisory Council for Science and Technology Policy (AWT) that advises the Dutch government and parliament on policy in the areas of scientific research, technological development and innovation. Antje Grobe is Senior Researcher / Project Manager University of Stuttgart, Germany, at ZIRN - Interdisciplinary Research Unit on Risk Governance and Sustainable Technology Development Managing Director, DIALOG BASIS At the University of Stuttgart (ZIRN Interdisciplinary Research Unit on Risk Governance and Sustainable Technology Development), Germany, Antje Grobe is Senior Researcher and Project Manager of national and international research projects on risk perception and the awareness of emerging technologies. She was responsible for the German part of the European FP7 funded Project NanoCode (2010-2011), for a perception study “Nanotechnology: What consumers want to know” for the German Consumer Associations (2008) and the study “NanoMedizin” on behalf of the Friedrich-Ebert-Foundation (2008); 2007-2008 for a study on Nanotechnologies in Food and Cosmetics on behalf of the International Risk Governance Councils (IRGC); and for the German Expert-Delphi on Nanotechnologies on behalf of the German Federal Institute of Risk Assessment (2006). She gives lectures on Professional Skills and Dialogue Management at the University of Stuttgart and on Risk Management and Communication at the University of St. Gall, Switzerland. Antje Grobe has facilitated stakeholder dialogues and citizen participation processes on nanotechnologies, energy transition and climate change, genetically modified organisms, stem cells and brain science for more than 17 years. Since 2004 her main emphasis is on nanotechnologies. She facilitated or contributed to more than 120 stakeholder dialogues, expert workshops, scientific conferences, focus groups and consumer conferences on issues such as occupational health, risk assessment, regulation, information and transparency. She serves as a scientific expert and facilitator for the European Commission since 2008, is Member of the Expert-Board “Society and Technic” of The Association of German Engineers (VDI); Member of the Nanotechnology Advisory Board of the Swiss Government; and Member of the MediationsAllianz Baden-Württemberg. She was Scientific Advisor of the German Government’s NanoKommission 2006-2011; and was Member of the Board of the Swiss Risk Dialogue Foundation 2009-2011.
9
Michael E. Gorman earned a Masters (1978) and a PhD (1981) in Social Psychology at the University of New Hampshire. He is a Professor in the Department of Science, Technology & Society at the University of Virginia, where he teaches courses on ethics, invention, psychology of science and communication. Currently he is working as a Program Director in the Science, Technology & Society program at the National Science Foundation. His research interests include experimental simulations of science, described in Simulating Science (Indiana University Press, 1992) and cognition, invention and ethics, described in Transforming Nature (Kluwer Academic Press, 1998). With support from the NSF, he conducted a multi-year cognitive study of the invention of the telephone whose results appeared in Social Studies of Science and Thinking and Reasoning. NSF supported his work with Patricia Werhane on case studies that combined ethics, invention and design, described in Ethical and Environmental Challenges to Engineering (Prentice-Hall, 2000). NSF also supported work that led to his edited volumes on Scientific and Technological Thinking (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005), and Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise: Creating New Kinds of Collaboration (MIT Press, 2010) He is a member of the editorial boards of the Journal of Psychology of Science and Technology and TopiCS in Cognitive Science—for the latter, he edited a special issue on Cognition in Science and Technology. He did a two-year rotation as an NSF STS program director. His current research is in the kind of interdisciplinary trading zones that will be needed for scientists, engineers and other stakeholders to collaborate on the development of new technologies. Chris Groves' work focuses on how people and institutions negotiate and deal with an intrinsically uncertain future – one increasingly imagined against the backdrop of global environmental change and accelerating technological innovation. Along with the ethical and political implications of a range of future-oriented discourses and practices (e.g. risk management, precautionary regulation, building resilience), he examines how our ideas about what it means for individuals and whole societies to take responsibility for their futures are being changed by emerging technologies (such as the convergence between bio- and nanotechnology and personalised genetic testing). The monograph Future Matters: Action, Knowledge, Ethics (Brill, 2007), co-authored with Professor Barbara Adam (Social Science, Cardiff University), examines these themes in depth. Pierre-Benoit Joly, economist and sociologist, is Directeur de recherche at the National Institute of Agronomic Research (INRA) in France. He holds a degree in agronomy (1982), a PhD in economics (1987) and the “Habilitation à diriger les recherches” (1995). He is the Director of the IFRIS (Institute For Research, Innovation and Society) and for Laboratory of Excellence (LabEx) SITES. His research activities are focused on the governance of collective risks, socio-technical controversies, the use of scientific advice in public decision making and the forms of public participation in scientific activities. He was a Member of the expert group “Science and Governance”, at the European Commission and he is member of the Council of EASST. He has published about one hundred papers (of which more than 50 in refereed journals), four books and he has coordinated five special issues of social sciences journals. He lectures at Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales (EHESS) on « Science, expertise and public debate » and at Sciences Po Paris on Risk Governance. Koert van Mensvoort. MFA MSc studied computer science, art and philosophy; he currently works on the cross-section of these disciplines. Van Mensvoort does not work in one specific medium or style, but rather, picks the most suitable medium with every concept – ranging from essays, documentaries, installations, games, paintings, websites or events. Van Mensvoort uses art & design as a means to materialize philosophy. His most profound experience in life, so far, has been the discovery of Next Nature, which revolves around the idea that our technological world is so omnipresent, intricate and complex, that it becomes a nature of its own. Thematically, all his work revolves around this topic. Van Mensvoort directs the Next Nature Network; an Amsterdam based think and design tank on the changing relation between people, nature and technology. Furthermore he heads the Next Nature Lab at the Industrial Design Department of the Eindhoven University of Technology. Pat Mooney has more than four decades experience working in international civil society, first addressing aid and development issues and then focusing on food, agriculture and commodity trade. In 1977 Mooney co-founded RAFI (Rural Advancement Fund International, renamed ETC Group in 2001). He received The Right
10
Livelihood Award (the "Alternative Nobel Prize") in the Swedish Parliament in 1985 and the Pearson Peace Prize from Canada's Governor General in 1998. He has also received the American "Giraffe Award" given to people "who stick their necks out." The author or co-author of several books on the politics of biotechnology and biodiversity, Pat Mooney is widely regarded as an authority on issues of global governance, corporate concentration, and intellectual property monopoly. Although much of ETC's work continues to emphasize plant genetic resources and agricultural biodiversity, the work expanded in the early 1980s to include biotechnology. In the late 1990s, the work expanded more to encompass a succession of emerging technologies such as nanotechnology, synthetic biology, geoengineering, and new developments in genomics and neurosciences. ETC remains a nano-CSO with offices in Canada, the United States, Mexico, the Philippines and Ethiopia and works in close cooperation with many civil society partners around the world. Daan Schuurbiers is director of the Pilot Plant (De Proeffabriek), a consultancy for responsible innovation. Daan studied chemistry and philosophy at the University of Amsterdam and has a PhD in ethics of technology from Delft University of Technology. His research efforts have focused on the design of new forms of collaboration between social and natural scientists, with the aim to integrate socio-ethical reflection in early stages of research. He now combines his research and management skills in his work for the Pilot Plant, advising on ways to encourage reflection in research and to strengthen stakeholder engagement with science and technology. Christos. Tokamanis isHead of Unit at European Commission.
11
Prog
ram
M
onda
y 22
-10
Tues
day
23-1
0 W
edne
sday
24-
10
Thur
sday
25-
10
9.
00–1
0.30
Pan
els*
* (L
ocat
ion:
Rav
elijn
)
9.00
–11.
00 P
anel
s (Lo
catio
n: R
avel
ijn)
9.00
–10.
30 P
anel
s (Lo
catio
n: R
avel
ijn)
10
.30–
11.0
0 Co
ffee
brea
k (L
ocat
ion:
Rav
elijn
) 11
.00–
11.3
0 Co
ffee
brea
k (L
ocat
ion:
Rav
elijn
) 10
.30–
11.0
0 Co
ffee
brea
k (L
ocat
ion:
Ra
velij
n)
Pre-
conf
eren
ce e
vent
S
.NET
Nan
olab
tour
, see
web
site
11
.00–
12.0
0 Pl
enar
y (L
ocat
ion:
Waa
ier 2
) Ch
ris G
rove
s Chr
is G
rove
s - H
orizo
ns o
f car
e:
from
futu
re im
agin
arie
s to
resp
onsib
le
inno
vatio
n
11.3
0–12
.30
Plen
ary
(Loc
atio
n: W
aaie
r 2)
Koer
t van
Men
svoo
rt –
NAN
O S
uper
mar
ket
11.0
0-12
.00
Pane
ls (L
ocat
ion:
Rav
elijn
)
12
.00–
13.0
0 Lu
nch
+ Po
ster
sess
ion
+ Pu
blic
En
gage
men
t Exh
ibiti
on
(Loc
atio
n: R
avel
ijn)
12.3
0–13
.30
Lunc
h +
Post
er se
ssio
n +
Publ
ic
Enga
gem
ent E
xhib
ition
(Loc
atio
n: R
avel
ijn)
12.1
5–13
.15
Plen
ary
(Loc
atio
n: W
aaie
r 2)
Pier
re B
enoi
t-Jo
ly -G
over
ning
Em
ergi
ng
Tech
nolo
gies
– T
he n
eed
to th
ink
out o
f the
bl
ack
box
13.0
0–14
.30
Pane
ls (L
ocat
ion:
Rav
elijn
)
13.3
0–15
.00
Pane
ls (L
ocat
ion:
Rav
elijn
) 13
.15
Take
Aw
ay L
unch
(Loc
atio
n: W
aaie
r)
15.0
0 –
16.0
0 Re
gist
ratio
n (L
ocat
ion:
W
aaie
r)
14.3
0–15
.00
Coffe
e br
eak
(Loc
atio
n: R
avel
ijn)
15
.00–
15.3
0 Co
ffee
brea
k (L
ocat
ion:
Rav
elijn
)
16.0
0 –
16.1
5 O
peni
ng re
mar
ks (L
ocat
ion:
W
aaie
r 2)
15.0
0–16
.30
Pane
ls (L
ocat
ion:
Rav
elijn
)
15.3
0–17
.00
Pane
ls (L
ocat
ion:
Rav
elijn
)
16.1
5 –
18.0
0 Pl
enar
y pr
esen
tatio
ns a
nd
disc
ussio
n (L
ocat
ion:
Waa
ier 2
) Da
ve B
lank
, Chr
isto
s Tok
aman
is, P
at
Moo
ney
- Em
ergi
ng te
chno
logi
es –
Fro
m
Tech
nolo
gy P
ush
to S
ocie
tal P
ull
16.3
0-16
.45
Coffe
e br
eak
(Loc
atio
n: R
avel
ijn)
17.0
0–17
.15
Brea
k (L
ocat
ion:
Rav
elijn
)
18.0
0 –2
1.00
Ope
ning
rece
ptio
n (L
ocat
ion
Waa
ier,
foye
r)
16.4
5–17
.45
Plen
ary
(Loc
atio
n: W
aaie
r 2)
Antje
Gro
be
17.1
5 –
18.1
5 Pl
enar
y (L
ocat
ion:
Waa
ier 2
) M
icha
el G
orm
an &
Daa
n Sc
huur
bier
s -
Com
preh
ensiv
e Sc
ienc
e an
d Te
chno
logy
En
gage
men
t
18
.45
Buss
es fr
om R
avel
ijn to
Con
fere
nce
Dine
r 18
.30-
19.
30 S
.NET
bus
ines
s mee
ting
19
.30–
23.0
0 Co
nfer
ence
Din
er
Loca
tion:
Het
Lan
sink,
Hen
gelo
12
Mon
day
22 O
ctob
er 2
012
15.0
0 –
16.0
0 Re
gist
ratio
n an
d ge
t tog
ethe
r. Lo
catio
n: W
aaie
r, en
tran
ce h
all d
owns
tairs
16
.00
– 16
.15
Ope
ning
rem
arks
. Loc
atio
n: W
aaie
r 2
16.1
5 –
18.0
0 Pl
enar
y di
scus
sion
CHRI
STO
S TO
KAM
ANIS
, DAV
E BL
ANK,
PAT
MO
ON
EY.
Emer
ging
tech
nolo
gies
– F
rom
Tec
hnol
ogy
Push
to S
ocie
tal P
ull
Loca
tion:
Waa
ier 2
18
.00
– 21
.00
Ope
ning
rece
ptio
n. L
ocat
ion:
Waa
ier,
foye
r
Tues
day
23 O
ctob
er 2
012
9.00
–10.
30
Para
llel s
essio
ns
Loca
tion:
Ra
velij
n
S1A
Stra
nd 3
N
EW A
PPRO
ACHE
S TO
GO
VERN
ANCE
AN
D TA
Ch
air:
Cuijp
ers (
tbc)
Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 15
01
S1B
Stra
nd 3
RE
SPO
NSI
BLE
INN
OVA
TIO
N A
ND
GOVE
RNAN
CE
APPR
OAC
HES
Chai
r: Be
nnet
t (tb
c)
Room
: Rav
elijn
RA
2501
S1C
Stra
nd 4
AS
SESS
ING
ANTI
CIPA
TORY
PR
ACTI
CES
Chai
r: Ri
p Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
02
S1D
Stra
nd 5
PU
BLIC
RIS
K PE
RCEP
TIO
NS
Chai
r: Co
rmic
k Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
03
S1E
Stra
nd 6
BI
OTE
CHN
OLO
GY
AND
SUST
AIN
ABIL
ITY
Chai
r: Fe
rrar
i Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
04
Si
mak
ova
& C
oene
n Se
lf-re
flect
ion
in th
e po
st-
posit
ivist
gov
erna
nce
of n
ewly
em
ergi
ng te
chno
scie
nces
Rand
les &
Lar
edo
Rese
arch
ing
Resp
onsib
le
Inno
vatio
n an
d Re
spon
sible
Gov
erna
nce:
Re
flect
ions
on
Socia
l In
quiry
and
Met
hod
Ciar
li, C
oad
& R
afol
s O
peni
ng u
p th
e Fu
ture
: an
Asse
smen
t of
Tech
nolo
gy F
utur
es
Anal
ysis
Colli
ns
Publ
ic Re
spon
ses t
o Na
note
chno
logy
: Risk
s to
the
Socia
l Fab
ric?
Bos,
Van
Len
te &
Pei
ne
Dyna
mics
of a
rtic
ulat
ion
in n
anot
echn
olog
y:
com
parin
g fix
ed a
nd
fluid
funn
els f
or
‘sust
aina
bilit
y’
Fo
nsec
a Br
azili
an N
anos
cient
ists’
Conc
eptio
ns a
bout
Ant
icipa
tory
Go
vern
ance
Pra
ctice
s:
evid
ence
s of u
naw
aren
ess a
nd
rece
ptiv
ity
Boen
ink
Antic
ipat
ing
the
futu
re
by w
ay o
f sce
nario
s:
hubr
is or
resp
onsib
le
gove
rnan
ce?
Clau
dia
Schw
arz
Firin
g an
d re
stric
ting
imag
inat
ion:
Tac
klin
g th
e do
uble
-edg
ed ch
arac
ter o
f an
alog
ies i
n de
bate
s ab
out e
mer
ging
te
chno
scie
nces
Ner
esin
i Fi
ve y
ears
late
r. Tr
ansf
orm
atio
ns in
the
socia
l rep
rese
ntat
ions
on
nan
otec
hnol
ogy
in
Italy
(200
6 an
d 20
11)
Wic
kson
Irr
espo
nsib
le &
Un
ethi
cal S
cienc
e fo
r Po
licy:
The
En
viro
nmen
tal
Gove
rnan
ce o
f Ag
ricul
tura
l Bi
otec
hnol
ogy
Va
n de
r Laa
n, C
uijp
ers &
Bo
enin
k Ne
w a
nd e
mer
ging
HTA
-pr
actic
es o
f ear
ly A
lzhei
mer
di
agno
stics
Wal
hout
Ri
sk g
over
nanc
e ar
enas
–
the
case
of n
anos
afet
y go
vern
ance
in T
he
Net
herla
nds
Ried
er
Nano
Fut
ures
in th
e M
akin
g: O
n th
e M
odal
ities
of S
ocia
l-Sc
ient
ific S
cena
rio
Build
ing
Corm
ick
A Pr
ecau
tiona
ry T
ale
Smith
Ex
plor
ing
the
func
tion
of ‘r
efle
ctiv
e to
ols’
in
bioe
nerg
y: e
xam
inin
g ac
tors
’ con
stru
ctio
ns o
f re
spon
sibili
ty
10.3
0–11
.00
Coffe
e br
eak.
Loc
atio
n: R
avel
ijn, d
own
in h
all
13
11.0
0–12
.00
Pl
enar
y le
ctur
e CH
RIS
GRO
VES
Horiz
ons o
f car
e: fr
om fu
ture
imag
inar
ies t
o re
spon
sible
inno
vatio
nLo
catio
n: W
aaie
r 2
12.0
0–13
.00
Lu
nch
brea
k +
post
er se
ssio
n +
publ
ic e
ngag
emen
t exh
ibiti
on. L
ocat
ion:
Rav
elijn
, dow
n in
hal
l
Tues
day
23 O
ctob
er 2
012
13.0
0–14
.30
Pa
ralle
l ses
sions
Lo
catio
n:
Rave
lijn
S2A
Stra
nd 1
R&
D EN
GAGE
MEN
T AN
D CO
LLO
ABO
RATI
ON
Ch
air:
Herr
Har
thor
n Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 15
01
S2B
Stra
nd 4
PA
NEL
M
OBI
LIZI
NG
UTO
PIAS
: TR
ACIN
G TH
E HI
STO
RICA
L SO
CIO
LOGY
O
F ‘E
MER
GIN
G TE
CHN
OLO
GY’
Chai
r: Ko
nrad
Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
01
S2C
Stra
nd 3
RE
SPO
NSI
BLE
NAN
OTE
CHN
OLO
GICA
L DE
VELO
PMEN
T Ch
air:
Wal
hout
Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
02
S2D
Stra
nd 4
SI
TUAT
ED
EXPE
CTAT
ION
S (A
ND
IMAG
INAR
IES)
Ch
air:
Stem
erdi
ng
Room
: Rav
elijn
RA
2503
S2E
Stra
nd 5
CO
NSU
MER
S RE
SPO
NSE
S &
HIG
H SC
HOO
L SE
TTIN
GS
Chai
r: tb
a Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
04
S2F
Stra
nd 6
RO
UN
DTAB
LE
GLO
BAL
HARM
ON
IES
AND
THE
WIS
DOM
OF
NAN
OTE
CHN
OLO
GY
Chai
r: N
ordm
ann
Room
: Rav
elijn
RA
4334
N
ydal
, Efs
tath
iou
& L
aegr
eid
Wid
enin
g th
e cir
cles o
f co
llabo
ratio
n - I
nteg
ratin
g ph
iloso
phy
in sy
stem
s bio
logy
Eard
ley-
Pryo
r Pl
anet
Nan
o-to
pia:
Na
note
chno
logy
and
Na
ture
in a
Tec
hno-
Utop
ia
Bukh
t & R
andl
es
Inte
rven
tion
of th
e St
ate
on R
espo
nsib
le
Deve
lopm
ent o
f Na
note
chno
logi
es in
Ca
nada
Beum
er
Expe
ctat
ions
of
nano
tech
nolo
gies
in
Indi
a, S
outh
Afr
ica a
nd
Keny
a
Kitis
riwor
apha
n Kn
owle
dge
and
attit
ude
tow
ards
safe
ty a
nd
ethi
cs o
f na
note
chno
logy
Nor
dman
n, W
ang
et a
l Ca
n th
e de
liber
atio
n of
et
hica
l and
socie
tal
dim
ensio
ns o
f na
note
chno
logy
wor
k on
a g
loba
l sca
le,
draw
ing
toge
ther
cu
ltura
lly d
iver
se
regi
ons o
f the
wor
ld?
Wha
t rol
e m
ight
pr
uden
tial a
ppro
ache
s an
d qu
estio
ns o
f fe
asib
ility
pla
y?
M
ahoo
tian
Inno
vatio
n by
dise
quili
briu
m
Frie
dman
To
Infin
ity a
nd B
eyon
d:
The
In-S
ilico
Lim
its o
f Se
lf-Re
plica
ting
Nano
As
sem
bler
s
Fole
y, W
etm
ore,
Be
nnet
t, W
iek
& G
usto
n Ap
plie
d Na
noet
hics
: who
is
resp
onsib
le fo
r wha
t?
Felt
Arch
eolo
gy o
f en
gage
men
t: Ci
tizen
s’ po
sitio
ning
wor
k to
war
ds n
eo-
tech
nolo
gies
Ferm
ont,
Gro
othu
is-
Oud
shoo
rn &
IJze
rman
M
easu
ring
publ
ic pr
efer
ence
s for
co
lore
ctal
canc
er
scre
enin
g us
ing
new
ge
nom
e---b
ased
na
note
chno
logi
es
Di
jkm
an, D
ijkst
ra, V
an W
oerk
um
& T
erw
oert
Ho
w to
regu
late
and
co
mm
unica
te n
anom
ater
ials’
he
alth
risk
s in
the
face
of
unce
rtai
nty?
Resu
lts o
f a
stak
ehol
der d
ialo
gue
with
exp
erts
Konr
ad
Com
men
tary
Do
ridot
Th
e di
ffere
nt m
odel
s of
ethi
cal g
over
nanc
e of
na
note
chno
logy
Bits
ch
Nego
tiatin
g ex
pect
atio
ns in
the
enco
unte
r bet
wee
n ge
nom
ics a
nd a
sthm
a re
sear
ch
Liso
tti,
Gold
oni &
De
Renz
i Na
note
chno
logy
at H
igh
Scho
ol: T
here
’s pl
enty
of
Phys
ics a
t the
bot
tom
!
14.3
0–15
.00
Co
ffee
brea
k. L
ocat
ion:
Rav
elijn
, dow
n in
hal
l
14
Tues
day
23 O
ctob
er 2
012
15.0
0–16
.30
Pa
ralle
l ses
sions
Lo
catio
n:
Rave
lijn
S3A
Stra
nd 2
TR
ACIN
G TH
E EM
BEDD
ING
OF
NAN
OTE
CHN
OLO
GY IN
IN
DUST
RY
Chai
r: Yo
utie
Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
01
S3B
Stra
nd 3
RI
SK G
OVE
RNAN
CE
Chai
r: W
icks
on (t
bc)
Room
: Rav
elijn
RA
2502
S3C
NET
S PR
OJE
CT
Chai
r: Ad
amic
k Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
03
OEC
D W
ORK
SHO
P PU
BLIC
EN
GAG
EMEN
T (d
iffer
ent t
imes
lot 1
4.45
-16.
40,
Rave
lijn
1501
and
hal
l)
Vo
n Ra
esfe
ld, G
eurt
s & Ja
nsen
W
hen
is a
netw
ork
a ne
xus f
or
inno
vatio
n? :
A st
udy
of p
ublic
pr
ivat
e na
note
chno
logy
R&
D pr
ojec
ts in
the
Neth
erla
nds
Van
der P
oel
New
tech
nolo
gies
as
socia
l exp
erim
ents
Adam
ick
et a
l Sh
arin
g In
tern
atio
nal
Rese
arch
and
Lea
rnin
g To
ols o
f Nan
oscie
nce
and
Emer
ging
Tec
hnol
ogie
s in
Socie
ty: S
trat
egy
and
Chal
leng
es
Corm
ick
cs
OEC
D w
orks
hop
Publ
ic En
gage
men
t
Co
ccia
& W
ang
Emer
ging
nan
o-te
chno
logi
cal
rese
arch
for f
utur
e pa
thw
ay o
f bi
omed
icine
Spru
it Co
ntex
tual
izing
the
expe
rimen
tal n
atur
e of
na
note
chno
logi
es
La
uret
h &
Inve
rniz
zi Ed
ucat
ing
nano
tech
nolo
gy
wor
kfor
ce in
Bra
zil: c
ompa
nies
’ de
man
ds a
nd u
nive
rsity
supp
ly
Door
n Te
chno
logi
e as
socia
l ex
perim
ents
: Cha
lleng
es
for r
egul
atio
n an
d go
vern
ance
risk
s 16
.30–
16.4
5
Brea
k to
wal
k to
Waa
ier
16.4
5–17
.45
Pl
enar
y Le
ctur
e AN
TJE
GRO
BE L
ocat
ion:
Waa
ier 2
18
.45
Buss
es le
avin
g fr
om R
avel
ijn to
the
rest
aura
nt
19.1
5–23
.00
Co
nfer
ence
Din
ner.
Loca
tion:
rest
aura
nt H
et L
ansin
k, H
enge
lo.
23.0
0 Bu
sses
leav
ing
from
rest
aura
nt to
hot
els a
nd R
avel
ijn
15
Wed
nesd
ay 2
4 O
ctob
er 2
012
9.00
–11.
00
Para
llel s
essio
ns
Loca
tion:
Ra
velij
n
S4A
Stra
nd 2
PAN
EL
WIL
L CH
INA’
S EF
FORT
TO
BE
COM
E A
HIGH
-TEC
H IN
NO
VATO
R SU
CCEE
D?
Mod
erat
or: M
ehta
Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 15
01
S4B
Stra
nd 3
RO
UN
D TA
BLE
RESP
ON
SIBL
E TE
CHN
OLO
GY
GOVE
RNAN
CE
Chai
r: Fo
rsbe
rg
Room
: Rav
elijn
RA
2501
S4C
Stra
nd 4
PAN
EL
CON
VERG
ING
TECH
NO
LOGI
ES L
OST
IN
IMAG
INAT
ION
? Ch
air:
Te K
ulve
Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
02
S4D
Stra
nd 5
PAN
EL
PUBL
IC IN
TERE
ST
GRO
UPS
AN
D PU
BLIC
EN
GAGE
MEN
T Ch
air:
Enge
man
Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
03
S4E
Stra
nd 1
RO
UN
D TA
BLE
WHO
ARE
TE
CHN
OSC
IEN
TIFI
C O
BJEC
TS?
Chai
r: Sc
hwar
z Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
04
S4F
Stra
nd 5
W
ORK
SHO
P ST
S CO
NCE
PTS
AND
EDU
CATI
ON
AL
APPR
OAC
HES
Ch
air:
Benn
ett
Room
: Rav
elijn
RA
2336
Sim
on
Chin
a’s E
volv
ing
Role
in
Inte
rnat
iona
l S&
T Af
fairs
Fors
berg
, Pal
dam
Fo
lker
, De
Bakk
er,
Rom
met
veit
& S
tran
d Fr
amew
orks
for
asse
ssin
g em
ergi
ng
scie
nce
and
tech
nolo
gies
: are
we
head
ing
tow
ards
in
crea
sed
inte
grat
ion
and,
if so
, is t
his t
he ri
ght
road
to re
spon
sible
te
chno
logy
gov
erna
nce?
Koks
ma
Bett
er B
rain
s for
the
Futu
re: M
yths
and
Dr
eam
s of E
duca
tiona
l Ne
uros
cienc
e
Enge
man
, Ear
l & H
err
Hart
horn
N
on-G
over
nmen
tal
Org
aniza
tions
and
Na
note
chno
logi
es
Futu
res
Schw
arz,
Van
den
Bur
g,
Ellio
tt, N
ordm
ann,
Lo
eve
& M
ilbur
n Te
chno
scie
ntifi
c obj
ects
ar
e co
oper
ativ
e in
stea
d of
intr
acta
ble
or
reca
lcitr
ant,
show
re
latio
nal a
fford
ance
s in
stea
d of
hav
ing
cons
tant
disp
ositi
ons
and
are
char
acte
rized
ra
ther
thro
ugh
pote
ncy
than
by
subs
tanc
e
Benn
ett,
Herr
ing,
O
stm
an, W
etm
ore
STS
Conc
epts
and
Ed
ucat
iona
l App
roac
hes
for E
ngag
ing
the
Publ
ic in
Nan
otec
hnol
ogy
and
Soci
ety
Ca
o Tr
ajec
tory
of C
hina
’s Hi
gh-T
ech
Deve
lopm
ent:
The
“Gro
win
g Pa
ins/
Prem
atur
e Se
nilit
y” T
hesis
Rev
isite
d
Ruiv
enka
mp
Prom
ises o
f Per
sona
lized
M
edici
ne
Inve
rniz
zi &
Fol
ador
i Tr
ade
Unio
ns’ c
once
rns
and
actio
ns re
gard
ing
nano
tech
nolo
gy ri
sks
Yo
utie
& K
ay
Emer
ging
tech
nolo
gies
and
co
rpor
ate
stra
tegi
es
The
case
of n
anot
echn
olog
y fo
r en
ergy
stor
age
solu
tions
Te K
ulve
, Kon
rad,
Alv
ial
Pala
vici
no &
Wal
hout
Th
e co
ntex
t of a
pplic
atio
n in
the
gene
ratio
n of
pr
omise
s and
con
cern
s
Cort
es-L
obos
Ad
voca
cy G
roup
s Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
in th
e Pu
blic
U.S.
Agr
ifood
Na
note
chno
logy
Re
sear
ch A
gend
a
Met
ha
Inte
rnat
iona
l Col
labo
ratio
n in
th
e Ch
ines
e Sc
ient
ific
Com
mun
ity
Lam
prou
Na
no v
s. Bi
o: N
GOs a
nd
Regu
lato
ry P
olicy
M
akin
g in
the
EU
G
ebbi
e, H
an &
Sto
ckin
g Is
Chin
a Be
com
ing
a Na
note
chno
logy
Lea
der?
Su
cces
ses a
nd C
halle
nges
in
Suzh
ou In
dust
rial P
ark
16
11.0
0–11
.30
Coffe
e br
eak.
Loc
atio
n: R
avel
ijn, d
own
in h
all
11.3
0–12
.30
Pl
enar
y le
ctur
e KO
ERT
VAN
MEN
SVO
ORT
NAN
O S
uper
mar
ket L
ocat
ion:
Waa
ier 2
12
.20–
13.3
0
Lunc
h br
eak
+ po
ster
sess
ion
+ pu
blic
eng
agem
ent e
xhib
ition
. Loc
atio
n: R
avel
ijn, d
own
in h
all
Wed
nesd
ay 2
4 O
ctob
er 2
012
13.3
0–15
.00
Pa
ralle
l se
ssio
ns
Loca
tion:
Ra
velij
n
S5A
Stra
nd 1
R&
D IN
THE
BIO
SCIE
NCE
S Ch
air:
Rafo
ls Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 15
01
S5B
Stra
nd 3
RE
GULA
TIO
N O
F N
ANO
TECH
NO
LOGY
Ch
air:
Bow
man
Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
01
S5C
Stra
nd 3
ST
AKEH
OLD
ER
PART
ICIP
ATIO
N A
ND
ENGA
GEM
ENT
1 Ch
air:
Bits
ch
Room
: Rav
elijn
RA
2502
S5D
Stra
nd 2
TR
ACIN
G TH
E EM
BEDD
ING
OF
NAN
OTE
CHN
OLO
GY IN
IN
DUST
RY
Chai
r: Sh
apira
Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
03
S6D
Stra
nd 5
PU
BLIC
CO
NCE
RNS
Chai
r: Ba
ndel
li Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
03
S5F
Stra
nd 6
EM
ERGI
NG
TECH
NO
LOGI
ES,
MO
RALI
TY A
ND
ETHI
CS
Chai
r: va
n de
r Sch
eer
Room
: Rav
elijn
Pr
ojec
troo
m
Ef
stat
hiou
, Nyd
al, L
aegr
id,
Kuip
er &
Car
usi
Whe
n kn
owle
dge
beco
mes
so
met
hing
to m
anag
e
Reic
how
& D
orbe
ck-Ju
ng
Soft
Regu
latio
n In
stru
men
ts fo
r Sa
fegu
ardi
ng
Occ
upat
iona
l Hea
lth a
nd
Safe
ty in
the
Wor
k w
ith
Nano
mat
eria
ls: T
he U
se
of a
Typ
olog
y
Van
Est,
Stem
erdi
ng,
Wal
hout
, Rer
imas
si &
Ha
nsse
n Th
e ne
ed fo
r a
com
preh
ensiv
e vi
ew o
n pu
blic
enga
gem
ent i
n sc
ienc
e an
d te
chno
logy
- Th
e ca
se o
f na
note
chno
logy
in th
e N
ethe
rland
s
Robi
nson
Be
spok
e in
dica
tors
of
socio
-eco
nom
ic im
pact
of
nan
otec
hnol
ogy:
im
pact
ass
essm
ent
chal
leng
es a
nd p
oint
ers
for n
ano-
invo
lved
in
dust
rial v
alue
cha
ins
Schu
man
n En
coun
terin
g “N
anof
ood”
. Ho
w A
ustr
ian
Citiz
ens
Appr
opria
te a
n Em
ergi
ng T
echn
olog
y in
th
e Fi
eld
of F
ood
and
Nutr
ition
Swie
rstr
a Th
e te
chni
cal m
edia
tion
of th
e go
od li
fe
Fe
lizar
do
Rece
pta’
s Cas
e: N
etw
ork
Part
ners
hips
and
Str
ateg
y fo
r Su
rviv
e as
Bio
tech
Sta
rt-u
p Co
mpa
ny in
Bra
zil
Beck
er
Nano
tech
nolo
gy in
the
Mar
ketp
lace
: How
the
Nano
tech
nolo
gy In
dust
ry
View
s Risk
and
Reg
ulat
ion
Fole
y &
Wie
k Na
note
chno
logy
in
nova
tion:
gov
erna
nce
by u
rban
act
ors
Yout
ie &
Kay
Acq
uirin
g Na
note
chno
logy
Ca
pabi
litie
s: R
ole
of
Mer
gers
and
Ac
quisi
tions
in th
e Na
note
chno
logy
Ec
osys
tem
Flei
sche
r Go
vern
ance
of p
rodu
cts
cont
aini
ng
man
ufac
ture
d na
nopa
rticl
es -
Regu
lato
ry e
xpec
tatio
ns
of ci
tizen
s
Wec
kert
“I
f we
don’
t som
ebod
y el
se w
ill”
Kl
aess
ig
Nano
tech
nolo
gy D
efin
ition
s Ex
amin
ed fr
om th
e St
andp
oint
of
Cent
ral a
nd P
erip
hera
l Cla
im
Lang
uage
Use
d in
Inte
llect
ual
Prop
erty
Law
Moo
s An
Unc
erta
in B
usin
ess:
Se
lf-re
gula
tion
by th
e Br
itish
and
Dan
ish N
ano
Indu
strie
s
Bruc
e &
Wal
ker
Wha
t are
pub
lics t
hink
ing
abou
t hum
an
enha
ncem
ent?
Pla
ying
De
moc
s car
d ga
mes
in
the
WP7
ETH
ENTE
CH
Proj
ect
Del B
arco
& F
olad
ori
The
Boliv
ian
inno
vatio
n po
licy
rega
rdin
g th
e ex
ploi
tatio
n of
lith
ium
Ellio
t Th
emes
in U
.S. C
ivil
Socie
ty R
espo
nses
to
Nano
tech
nolo
gy
Van
der D
rift
Mor
alizi
ng
Tech
nolo
gies
and
Mor
al
de-S
killi
ng
15.0
0–15
.30
Co
ffee
brea
k. L
ocat
ion:
Rav
elijn
, dow
n in
hal
l
17
Wed
nesd
ay 2
4 O
ctob
er 2
012
15
.30–
17.0
0
Para
llel
sess
ions
Lo
catio
n:
Rave
lijn
S6A
Stra
nd 1
(N
ANO
)TEC
HNO
LOGI
CAL
EVO
LUTI
ON
Ch
air:
Wec
kert
Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 15
01
S6B
Stra
nd 3
GO
VERN
ANCE
LES
SON
S Ch
air:
Reic
how
Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
01
S5D
Stra
nd 3
ST
AKEH
OLD
ER
PART
ICIP
ATIO
N A
ND
ENGA
GEM
ENT
2 Ch
air:
Shel
ley-
Egan
Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
02
S5E
Stra
nd 2
N
ATIO
NAL
CU
LTU
RES
OF
NAN
O IN
NO
VATI
ON
Ch
air:
Robi
nson
Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
04
S6E
Stra
nd 6
RE
SPO
NSI
BLE
INN
OVA
TIO
N
Chai
r: va
n de
r Laa
n Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
04
S6F
Stra
nd 6
EM
ERGI
NG
TECH
NO
LOGI
ES A
ND
KN
OW
LEDG
E PO
LITI
CS
Chai
r: Co
zzen
s Ro
om: R
avel
ijn
Proj
ectr
oom
Beyh
an
Tran
sfer
of n
anot
echn
olog
ies
from
uni
vers
ities
to fi
rms:
Ev
iden
ce fr
om T
urke
y
Kuzm
a, K
okot
ovic
h &
Ku
zhab
ekov
a Hi
stor
y Re
peat
s Its
elf?
Go
vern
ance
of N
ew
Met
hods
for
Targ
eted
Gen
etic
Mod
ifica
tion
in th
e U.
S.
Bakk
er e
t al
Nano
tech
nolo
gy in
food
: pu
blic
conc
erns
, na
rrat
ives
and
as
sess
men
t nee
ds
Kloc
hikh
in &
Sha
pira
Gi
ants
in sm
all w
orld
s?
Inno
vatio
n an
d na
note
chno
logy
de
velo
pmen
t in
Chin
a an
d Ru
ssia
Barp
ujar
i In
cent
ivizi
ng In
nova
tion
and
Serv
ing
the
Publ
ic Go
od: E
xten
ding
the
Pate
nt R
egim
e to
Na
note
chno
logy
in
Indi
a
Bove
t & R
andl
es
Man
agin
g a
cont
rove
rsia
l te
chno
logy
in th
e ab
senc
e of
cont
rove
rsy:
th
e “i
n vi
tro”
po
litici
satio
n of
na
note
chno
logi
es
U
lnic
ane-
Ozo
lina
How
to e
xpla
in su
cces
sful
long
-te
rm in
tern
atio
nal r
esea
rch
colla
bora
tion
in n
ano
S&T
in
Euro
pe?
Coen
en, F
erra
ri Eu
rope
an g
over
nanc
e ac
tiviti
es o
n Hu
man
co
gniti
ve e
nhan
cem
ent
Åm
New
Mat
eria
ls in
Sol
ar
Cells
: Stu
dyin
g R&
D Pr
actic
es o
f Em
ergi
ng
Tech
nolo
gies
Sekh
saria
Th
e m
akin
g of
an
Indi
an
STM
& T
echn
olog
ical
juga
ad a
s a ‘C
ultu
re o
f In
nova
tion’
in In
dia
Cuijp
ers
Wha
t is t
he ro
le o
f an
STS
rese
arch
er o
n re
spon
sible
inno
vatio
n of
em
erge
nt
tech
nolo
gies
?
Van
der S
chee
r Tw
o ca
ses o
f pat
ient
in
volv
emen
t in
tran
slatio
nal m
olec
ular
m
edici
ne
Br
uyns
eels
In
nova
tions
in D
NA
sequ
encin
g te
chno
logi
es: T
he co
nver
genc
e of
te
chno
logi
es d
rives
a
conv
erge
nce
of co
ncep
tual
fr
amew
orks
Rugg
iu
The
Gove
rnan
ce o
f En
hanc
emen
t te
chno
logi
es a
nd th
e Ro
le
of E
thics
in E
urop
e: a
Hu
man
Rig
hts L
egal
Pe
rspe
ctiv
e
Corn
er, P
arkh
ill, P
idge
on
& V
augh
an
Publ
ic de
liber
atio
n ab
out
geoe
ngin
eerin
g:
resp
onsib
le in
nova
tion
and
desig
n
Said
i Tr
ansla
tion
from
la
bora
tory
to p
ract
ice:
The
Impl
icatio
ns o
f Na
note
chno
logy
Von
Scho
mbe
rg &
Gu
imar
aes P
erei
ra
Chal
leng
es o
f Re
spon
sible
Res
earc
h an
d In
nova
tion
at th
e Gl
obal
leve
l
17.0
0–17
.15
Br
eak,
wal
k to
Waa
ier
17.1
5–18
.15
Pl
enar
y le
ctur
e M
ICHA
EL G
ORM
AN &
DAA
N S
CHU
URB
IERS
Com
preh
ensiv
e Sc
ienc
e an
d Te
chno
logy
Eng
agem
ent L
ocat
ion:
Waa
ier 2
18
.30–
19.3
0
S.N
et B
usin
ess m
eetin
g
18
Thur
sday
25
Oct
ober
201
2
9.00
–10.
30
Para
llel s
essio
ns
Loca
tion:
Ra
velij
n
S7A
Stra
nd 6
EM
ERGI
NG
TECH
NO
LOGI
ES
AND
ETHI
CAL
GOVE
RNAN
CE
Chai
r: Bo
enin
k Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 15
01
S7B
Stra
nd 3
RE
GULA
TORY
AP
PRO
ACHE
S 1
Chai
r: Do
rbec
k-Ju
ng
Room
: Rav
elijn
RA
2501
S7C
Stra
nd 3
RE
GULA
TIO
N N
EW
TECH
NO
LOGI
ES
Chai
r: He
ldew
eg
Room
: Rav
elijn
RA
2502
S7D
Stra
nd 4
AR
GUM
ENTA
TIVE
PR
ACTI
CES
IN
TECH
NO
SCIE
NTI
FIC
CON
TRO
VERS
IES
Chai
r: Va
n Le
nte
Room
: Rav
elijn
RA
2503
S7E
Stra
nd 5
(IN
FORM
AL) P
UBL
IC
DIAL
OGU
E Ch
air:
Dort
man
s Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
04
G
rinba
um
Wha
t is “
Resp
onsib
le” a
bout
Re
spon
sible
Inno
vatio
n?
Boss
o Em
ergi
ng T
echn
olog
ies,
Inst
itutio
nal C
apac
ity,
and
the
Chal
leng
es o
f Go
vern
ance
in th
e 21
st
Cent
ury:
Les
sons
from
a
Deca
de o
f Na
note
chno
logy
Kica
& B
owm
an
Regu
latio
n by
mea
ns o
f st
anda
rdisa
tion:
Ke
y le
gitim
acy
issue
s of
heal
th a
nd sa
fety
na
note
chno
logy
st
anda
rds
Que
t Th
e in
fluen
ce o
f pr
omiss
ory
com
mun
icatio
n on
the
criti
que
of e
mer
ging
te
chno
logi
es
Seife
rt
Diffu
sion
and
Polic
y Le
arni
ng in
the
Nano
tech
-Fie
ld.
Mov
emen
t act
ors a
nd
publ
ic di
alog
ues i
n Gr
eat B
ritai
n, G
erm
any
and
Fran
ce
Pe
llizz
oni
Ethi
cal g
over
nanc
e an
d hu
man
na
ture
. So
me
prob
lem
s of t
he re
cent
de
bate
on
tech
no-s
cienc
e an
d (p
ost-
)hum
anity
Jasp
ers
Sile
nt D
iver
genc
e:
Nano
tech
nolo
gy P
olicy
in
the
Unite
d St
ates
and
Eu
rope
Guiv
ant
GMO
s in
Braz
il: th
e clo
sure
of t
he co
ntro
vers
y w
ith a
new
conf
igur
atio
n of
coal
ition
s and
deb
ates
Gel
fert
Ex
pert
s, Pr
edic
tions
, an
d Pr
omise
s: A
Pa
rado
x of
Te
chno
fidei
sm
Dijk
stra
Sc
ienc
e Ca
fés a
nd
scie
ntifi
c cit
izens
. The
Na
notr
ail p
roje
ct a
s a
case
M
alsc
h Em
ergi
ng T
echn
olog
ies a
nd
Peac
e
Dorb
eck-
Jung
& S
helle
y-Eg
an
Met
a-re
gula
tion
in th
e go
vern
ance
of t
he
resp
onsib
le d
evel
opm
ent
of n
anot
echn
olog
y:
oppo
rtun
ities
and
ch
alle
nges
Gol
tzPr
otec
ting
Child
ren
in th
e Af
term
ath
of B
row
n v.
En
t’ –
Empl
oyin
g Ne
w
Regu
lato
ry M
easu
res
Brey
To
p-Le
vel A
naly
sis o
f Em
ergi
ng T
echn
olog
ies
in A
ntici
pato
ry
Tech
nolo
gy E
thics
Dort
man
s As
sess
ing
info
rmal
pu
blic
dial
ogue
on
new
an
d em
ergi
ng sc
ienc
e an
d te
chno
logy
10.3
0–11
.00
Coffe
e br
eak.
Loc
atio
n: R
avel
ijn, d
own
in h
all
19
Thur
sday
25
Oct
ober
201
2
11.0
0–12
.00
Para
llel s
essio
ns
Loca
tion:
Ra
velij
n
S8A
Stra
nd 6
N
ANO
TECH
NO
LOGI
ES IN
CO
NTE
XT
Chai
r: Br
ey
Room
: Rav
elijn
RA
1501
S8B
Stra
nd 3
RE
GULA
TORY
AP
PRO
ACHE
S 2
Chai
r: St
okes
Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
01
S8C
Stra
nd 3
RI
SK G
OVE
RNAN
CE A
ND
EXPE
RT IN
VOLV
EMEN
T Ch
air:
Kica
Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
02
S8D
Stra
nd 4
TR
ACIN
G TR
ANSH
UM
AN
NAR
RATI
VES
Chai
r: Ge
lfert
Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
03
S8E
Stra
nd 6
N
ANO
TECH
NO
LOGI
ES
AND
(INTE
R)N
ATIO
NAL
CO
NTE
XTS
Chai
r: Gu
ivan
t Ro
om: R
avel
ijn R
A 25
04
S8F
Stra
nd 4
AS
SESS
ING
AND
NEG
OTI
ATIO
N
EXPE
CTAT
ION
S Ch
air:
Te K
ulve
Ro
om: R
avel
ijn
Proj
ectr
oom
Mer
z & S
tras
snig
Th
e Lo
tus E
ffect
of R
esea
rch
Fund
ing:
Gov
erni
ng S
cienc
e on
Na
no R
isks
Reyn
olds
& F
leur
ke
Can
the
prec
autio
nary
pr
incip
le o
ffer g
uida
nce
for t
he re
gula
tion
of
clim
ate
engi
neer
ing
rese
arch
?
Beau
dri,
Kand
likar
, Sa
tter
field
, Her
r Har
thor
n Go
vern
ing
the
Unce
rtai
n: E
xper
t Ju
dgm
ent B
ased
Risk
Sc
reen
ing
for E
mer
ging
Na
note
chno
logi
es
Hort
on
Scal
ar E
rasu
re a
nd
Spec
ulat
ive
Med
ia: T
he
Nano
tech
nolo
gica
l Im
agin
atio
n Go
es
Plan
etar
y
Ku
The
Polit
ics o
f Nan
oELS
I in
the
U.S.
Robi
nson
, Del
emar
le,
Kaha
ne &
Lar
édo
Visio
n As
sess
men
t in
Asyn
chro
nous
Log
ic
Co
zzen
s, C
orte
s, H
arsc
h,
Soum
onni
, Wet
mor
e &
W
oods
on
Equi
ty, E
qual
ity, a
nd N
atio
nal
Cont
exts
: Th
e U.
S. a
nd S
outh
Afr
ica a
s En
viro
nmen
ts fo
r N
anot
echn
olog
ies
Held
eweg
Fo
ster
ing
Inno
vatio
n by
Re
gula
tory
Reg
ime
Desig
n: B
eyon
d In
diffe
renc
e
Deva
ney
Legi
timisi
ng (t
he) E
xper
ts:
Agen
cy R
egul
atio
n of
Em
ergi
ng B
iote
chno
logi
es
De la
Giro
day
Zom
bies
, bra
ins,
colla
psin
g bo
unda
ries,
and
enta
ngle
men
ts
Zaya
go L
au
Deve
lopm
enta
l Im
plica
tions
of
Nan
otec
hnol
ogie
s
Koko
tovi
ch &
Kuz
ma
Antic
ipat
ory
gove
rnan
ce a
nd
conf
lictin
g fu
ture
s:
Insig
hts f
rom
the
next
ge
nera
tion
of
gene
tic e
ngin
eerin
g
12.1
5-13
.15
Pl
enar
y le
ctur
e PI
ERRE
BEN
OIT
-JO
LY G
over
ning
Em
ergi
ng Te
chno
logi
es –
The
nee
d to
thin
k ou
t of t
he b
lack
box
Loca
tion:
Waa
ier 2
Cl
osin
g 13
.15
Take
Aw
ay L
unch
Waa
ier,
dow
n in
hal
l
20
OECD Workshop Workshop on aligning Policy, Practice and Research of Community Engagement on Nanotechnology The workshop will be hosted by the OECD Working Party on Nanotechnology (WPN) in cooperation with the S.NET 2012 committee, to be held at the University of Twente, the Netherlands, 23 October 2012. Preparation for participants (non-obligatory, but certainly helpful): * have read the OECD best practice engagement document * have developed a few best practice principles from their own field of expertise to bring to the workshop * have listed any success factors for engagement activities they have been involved in. Agenda The workshop will be run as an engagement activity itself, using different forms of public engagement methodologies to allow for multiple inputs and broad agreement on outcomes. Prior to the workshop participants should have read the OECD best practice engagement document. 1. Introduction and framing of the workshop. Outline the objectives of the workshop, what is achievable and what is not achievable. 2. Impediments to good engagement (Problems) Done in world cafe style, where people form into small groups to brainstorm issues of concern to them, and then jointly select the top five items to be shared with the whole group. Top five from each group are put onto a communal chart and are grouped into themes. 3. What to do about these impediments? (Activities/ Solutions) Forming into new groups people jointly discuss, but individually make suggestions as to what can be done to address the issues raised above. People suggest ideas to address issues raised above, that have been raised by somebody else, write them on post-it notes and stick them onto a charts around the room defined by theme. 4. Gap analysis (what does good engagement look like?/ Principles) Reforming into new groups, tables jointly discuss how well the existing OECD principles fit the solutions raised above, and what new points or clarifications need to be addressed to make them best fit? Or what do we need to do to fill the gaps? Use OECD principles as key headings. 5. Conclusions Summary of points raised and what has been learned and discussion with the group of what the next steps might be.
21
Program committee Marjolein van Asselt Technology and Society Studies, Maastricht University, the Netherlands and Scientific
Council for Government Policy (WRR), The Hague, the Netherlands Andrea Bandelli Department of Communication Science, VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands Michael G. Bennett Northeastern University School of Law, USA Diana Bowman Risk Science Centre and Department of Health Management and Policy, School of
Public Health, the University of Michigan, USA and Faculty of Management and Governance, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
Suzan Cozzens School of Public Policy and Technology Policy and Assessment Center, Georgia
Institute of Technology, USA Arianna Ferrari Karlsruhe Institute of Technology/Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems
Analysis, Germany Julia Guivant Department of Sociology and Political Science, Federal University of Santa Catarina,
Brazil Barbara Herr Harthorn Department of Feminist Studies, Center for Nanotechnology in Society, University of
California, USA Ismael Rafols Science and Technology Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex and Ingenio, CSIC,
Universitat Politècnica València, Spain Arie Rip Science, Technology and Policy Studies, University of Twente, The Netherlands John Weckert Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Charles Sturt University, Australia Fern Wickson GenØk Centre for Biosafety, Tromsø, Norway Jan Youtie School of Public Policy and Enterprise Innovation institute, Georgia Institute of
Technology, USA
22
Public engagement activities exhibition On Tuesday and Wednesday, a number of organizations will have a display in the hall of the Ravelijn building, exhibiting the public engagement activities they carried out. They will exhibit demos and materials used in their engagement activities, show audiovisual reports and/or display posters to highlight their work. From the Netherlands a number of organizations that took part in the societal dialogue on nanotechnology (Nanopodium) will present their work. In addition, several researchers from other countries will display materials used in engagement on other emerging technologies. If you are interested to consult their materials, learn from their experiences, and to get inspiration for your own activities: please come by during one of the breaks on Tuesday and Wednesday!
S.NET Nanolab tours This is a pre-conference event. If you are arriving early for the S.NET conference, we offer you the opportunity to get an inside view of a University of Twente nanotechnology lab, where technologies and their applications are actually emerging. As a pre-conference event, two lab tours are arranged. Lab tour 1: This lab is working on ground-breaking nanomedical developments (cells on a chip, nanosensors). Lab tour 2: This lab is studying the organization, dynamics and mechanical properties of proteins, also for biomedical purposes.
23
Local organizing committee
(Top row, from left to right) - Anne Dijkstra, Marcia Clifford, Kornelia Konrad (Bottom row, from left to right) - Evelien Rietberg, Marianne Boenink, Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung Marianne Boenink is an assistant professor at the Department of Philosophy at the University of Twente. She has a background in health sciences and philosophy. Her research interests mainly focus on philosophy and ethics of emerging biomedical technologies, including studies of genetic testing as well as population screening for breast cancer and of molecular diagnostics for Alzheimer’s Disease. Her work in these areas is driven by her interest in emerging visions and trends in medicine more generally, like for example the pleas for predictive, preventive and personalized medicine, the trend towards ongoing ‘molecularization’ of disease processes enabled by the convergence of biomedicine, nanotechnology and ICT, and the emerging hype of ‘translational research’ in medicine. In addition, she works on the use of techno-moral scenarios and vignettes as ways to broaden societal and ethical reflection on emerging technologies. m.boenink@utwente.nl Marcia Clifford is the secretary of the Institute for Innovation and Governance Studies (IGS) at the University of Twente. m.f.clifford@utwente.nl Bärbel Dorbeck-Jung is Professor of Regulation and Technology (with a focus on medical and nanotechnologies). She holds a Master’s degree in German law (University of München) and a Dutch PhD in Technical Sciences. She is a research Fellow of the University’s Institute for Governance Studies (IGS), a member of the Netherlands Institute of Government (NOB) and an associate member of the Ius Commune Research School. Additional functions include: Member of the Executive Board of the European Technology Platform Nanomedicine, chair of the Dutch and Flemish Association of Social Studies of Law, member of the Nanotechnology Commission of the Dutch Standardization Association (NEN), member Advisory Board Dutch Journal of Legal Philosophy and Legal Theory. Dorbeck-Jung worked and published on topics related to governance, legislation and self-regulation, good governance and the rule of law, computer law, health care law and technological regulation (IT and nanotechnologies). Currently she conducts empirical and theoretical studies on the effectiveness and legitimacy of medical technology and nanotechnology governance. Dorbeck-Jung is one of the project leaders of the Dutch NanoNext Programme Risk & Technology Assessment (funded by the Dutch Government). She participated in the IVAM University of Amsterdam project ‘Pilot Nano Reference
24
Values’. Dorbeck-Jung teaches bachelor and master courses on health law and medical technology regulation. b.r.dorbeck-jung@utwente.nl Anne M. Dijkstra, PhD (University of Twente) is an assistant professor in Science Communication at the University of Twente, faculty of Behavioural Sciences. She studies the changing relationship between science, technology and society from a communication perspective. Her research focuses on scientific citizenship, public participation, science communication and risk governance regarding new technologies such as biotechnology, genomics, human enhancement and nanotechnology. She designed the master programme Science Communication of the newly accredited master Science Education and Communication and is coordinator of this programme. In 2008 she defended her PhD dissertation entitled ‘Of publics and science. How publics engage with biotechnology and genomics’. Prior to her academic work she worked as a project manager and senior communication advisor in the field of science and risk communication. As a volunteer she is organising public meetings for the Science Café Deventer (www.sciencecafedeventer.nl). In July 2012, she organized also the first, very successful science-art festival in Deventer which attracted 600 visitors (www.kopfestivaldeventer.nl). She is also involved in the children’s science café Zabuki (Nature, 2011). a.m.dijkstra@utwente.nl Kornelia Konrad is Assistant Professor of Dynamics and Assessment of Emerging Technologies at the University of Twente, NL, within the Department of Science, Technology, and Policy Studies (STePS). She is heading a group of PhD and postdoc projects investigating the societal embedding of nanotechnologies into society, focusing on promises and concerns, socio-technical scenarios, sectoral change and responsible innovation, funded by the Dutch national research program NanoNextNL. Her research interests relate to the role of anticipation in innovation processes, sustainable transitions and science-industry interactions. She holds a master’s degree in sociology, physics and mathematics from the University of Freiburg, and a PhD from the Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany. k.e.konrad@utwente.nl Evelien Rietberg is the secretary of the department of Science, Technology and Policy Studies at the University of Twente. e.rietberg@utwente.nl,
25
S.NET board members
As from 1 January 2012 onward President Davis Baird, Clark University Continuing members Diana Bowman, University of Melbourne Julia Guivant, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina David Guston, Arizona State University Kornelia Konrad, University of Twente Colin Milburn, University of California at Davis Rae Ostman, Sciencenter Ithaca Astrid Schwarz, Technical University Darmstadt Phil Shapira, University of Manchester John Weckert, Charles Sturt University Fern Wickson, University of Tromsø
26
List of participants
Last name First name Institute Country Email
Åm Heidrun NTNU Trondheim Norway Heidrun.aam@ntnu.no
Adamick Jessica University of Massachusetts Amherst
USA jadamick@library.umass.edu
Alvial Palavicino
Carla University of Twente The Netherlands c.alvialp@utwente.nl
Baird Davis Clark University USA dbaird@clarku.edu Banaiean-Mofrad
Ghazaleh Iran ghazaleh.banaiyan@gmail.com
Barpujari Indrani The Energy and Resources Institute India indrani@barpujari@teri.res.in
Barvosa Edwina CNS - UCSB USA jadamick@library.umass.edu
Beaudrie Christian University of British Columbia Canada christian.beaudrie@gmail.com
Becker Sean University of Wisconsin - Madison USA seanlouisbecker@gmail.com
Bennett Michael Northeastern University School of Law
USA m.bennett@neu.edu
Berube David North Carolina State University USA drdmberube@gmail.com
Beumer Koen Maastricht University The Netherlands k.beumer@maastrichtuniversity.nl
Beyhan Berna University of Gothenburg Sweden berna.beyhan@handels.gu.se
Bitsch Lise University of Twente The Netherlands lisebitsch343@gmail.com
Blank Dave University of Twente The Netherlands d.h.a.blank@utwente.nl
Boenink Marianne University of Twente The Netherlands m.boenink@utwente.nl
Bos Colette Utrecht University The Netherlands c.bos@uu.nl
Bosso Christopher Northeastern University USA c.bosso@neu.edu
Bowman Diana The Univ. of Michigan & University of Twente
USA Dibowman@umich.edu
Brey Philip University of Twente The Netherlands p.a.e.brey@utwente.nl
Bruce Donald Edinethics Ltd Scotland, UK info@edinethics.co.uk
Bruynseels Koen Delft University of Technology The Netherlands koen.bruynseels@gmail.com
Bukht Rumana The University of Manchester UK Lisa.Gledhill@manchester.ac.uk
Cao Cong University of Nottingham UK cong.cao@nottingham.ac.uk
Clifford Marcia University of Twente The Netherlands m.f.clifford@utwente.nl
Coenen Christopher Karlsruhe Institute of Technology KIT-ITAS
Germany christopher.coenen@kit.edu
Collins Mary University of California USA mcollins@bren.ucsb.edu
Cormick Craig Australian Department of Innovation
Australia craig.cormick@innovation.gov.au
Corner Adam Cardiff University UK corneraj@cardiff.ac.uk
Cortes Rodrigo Universidad de Talca Chile rcortes@gatech.edu
Cozzens Susan Georgia Institute of Technology USA scozzens@gatech.edu
Cuijpers Yvonne Utrecht University The Netherlands y.m.cuijpers@uu.nl
de Bakker Erik LEI (Agricultural Economics Institute)
The Netherlands erik.debakker@wur.nl
de la Giroday Maryse Canada nano@frogheart.ca
Delemarle Aurelie Univ Paris Est - ESIEE Paris France a.delemarle@esie.fr
Devaney Sarah University of Manchester UK sarah.devaney@manchester.ac.uk
Dijkman Anja TNO The Netherlands anja.dijkman@tno.nl
Dijkstra Anne University of Twente The Netherlands a.m.dijkstra@utwente.nl
27
Doorn Neelke Delft University of Technology The Netherlands N.Doorn@tudelft.nl
Doridot Fernand CETS (Centre for Ethics, Technics and Society)
France fernand.doridot@icam.fr
Dorbeck-Jung Bärbel University of Twente The Netherlands b.r.dorbeck-jung@utwente.nl
Dortmans Koen Radboud University Nijmegen The Netherlands k.dortmans@science.ru.nl
Eardley-Pryor Roger University of California Santa Barbara
USA pryorrw@umail.ucsb.edu
Efstathiou Sophia Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Norway sophia.efstathiou@ntnu.no
Elliott Kevin University of South Carolina USA ke@sc.edu
Engeman Cassandra University of California USA engeman@cns.ucsb.edu
Felizardo Rafael University of Sao Paolo Brazil rafael.felizardo@usp.br
Felt Ulrike University of Vienna Austria ulrike.felt@univie.ac.at
Fermont Jilles University of Twente Netherlands mail@fermontresearch.com
Fleischer Torsten Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
Germany Torsten.Fleischer@kit.edu
Foladori Guillermo Autonomous University of Zacatecas
Mexico 12foladori@gmail.com
Foley Rider Arizona State University USA rider.foley@gmail.com
Fonseca Paulo University of Coimbra Portugal paulofonseca@ces.uc.pt
Forsberg Ellen-Marie Oslo and Akershus University College
Norway Ellenmarie.Forsberg@hioa.no
Friedman Itamar University of South Carolina USA itabar84@gmail.com
Gebbie Matthew University of California USA magebbie@gmail.com
Gelfert Axel National University of Singapore Singapore phigah@nus.edu.sg
Gholami Mahtab Msc graduated student Iran mahtab_gholami2885@yahoo.com
Goltz Nachshon York University Canada n.goltz@gmail.com
Grinbaum Alexei CEA-Saclay/LARSIM France alexei.grinbaum@cea.fr
Grobe Antje University of Stuttgart Germany antje.grobe@sowi.uni-stuttgart.de
Groves Chris Cardiff University UK grovesc1@cf.ac.uk
Guimarães Pereira
Ângela European Commission - Joint Research Centre
Italy angela.pereira@jrc.ec.europa.eu
Guivant Julia S. Federal University of Santa Catarina Brazil juliaguivant@gmail.com
Han Xueying (Shirley)
University of California USA shirley.han@lifesci.ucsb.edu
Harthorn Barbara University of California USA harthorn@cns.ucsb.edu
Heldeweg Michiel University of Twente The Netherlands m.a.heldeweg@utwente.nl
Herring Brad Museum of Life and Science USA bradh@ncmls.org
Hoes Anne-Charlotte
Lei, Wageningen UR The Netherlands anne-charlotte.hoes@wur.nl
Horton Zachary University of California USA zhorton@umail.ucsb.edu
Invernizzi Noela Federal University of Parana Brasil noela.invernizzi@gmail.com
Benoit-Joly Pierre INRA France joly@ivry.inra.fr
Kay Luciano University of California USA luciano@cns.ucsb.edu
Keys Cameron Arizona State University USA cameron.keys@asu.edu
Kica Evisa University of Twente Netherlands e.kica@utwente.nl
Kitisriworaphan Thanate Bangkok Thonburi University Thailand nanosoctk@gmail.com
Klaessig Frederick Pennsylvania Bio Nano Systems, LLC
USA fred.klaessig@verizon.net
Klochikhin Evgeny Manchester Institute of Innovation Research (MIoIR)
UK Lisa.Gledhill@manchester.ac.uk
Kokotovich Adam University of Minnesota USA koko0013@umn.edu
28
Koksma Jur UMCN The Netherlands J.Koksma@iwoo.umcn.nl
Konrad Kornelia University of Twente The Netherlands k.e.konrad@utwente.nl
Ku Sharon University of Southern Indiana USA sharonku0401@gmail.com
Kuzma Jennifer University of Minnesota-USA USA kuzma007@umn.edu
Lamprou Anna Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute USA lampra@rpi.edu
Larédo Philippe Univ. Paris Est (IFRIS) & Univ. of Manchester (MIoIR)
France Philippe.laredo@enpc.fr
Lisotti Annamaria University of Modena and Reggio E. Italy annamaria.lisotti@unimore.it
Loeber Anne University of Amsterdam The Netherlands a.m.c.loeber@uva.nl
Luschen Ria University of Twente The Netherlands h.j.luschen@utwente.nl
Mahootian Farzad New York University USA fm57@nyu.edu
Malsch Ineke Malsch TechnoValuation The Netherlands postbus@malsch.demon.nl
Marschalek Ilse Centre for Social Innovation Austria marschalek@zsi.at
Mehta Aashish University of California-Santa Barbara
USA mehta@global.ucsb.edu
Merz Martina University of Lucerne Switzerland martina.merz@unilu.ch
Milburn Colin University of California, Davis USA cnmilburn@ucdavis.edu
Mohebbi Sajjad University of Kurdistan Iran sajadmohebi@yahoo.com
Mooney Pat ETC Group mooney@etcgroup.org
Moos Pelle European University Institute Italy pelle.moos@eui.eu
Moors Ellen Copernicus Institute The Netherlands e.h.m.moors@uu.nl
Mout Jacqueline Ministry of Education, Culture and Science
The Netherlands j.n.mout@minocw.nl
Neresini Federico University of Padua Italy federico.neresini@unipd.it
Neven Louis Utrecht University The Netherlands L.B.M.Neven@uu.nl
Nordmann Alfred University Darmstadt Germany nordmann@phil.tu-darmstadt.de
Nydal Rune Norwegian University of science and technology
Norway rune.nydal@ntnu.no
Ostman Rae Sciencenter USA rostman@sciencenter.org
Pellizzoni Luigi University of Trieste Italy pellizzonil@sp.units.it
Pierce Robin Delft University of Technology The Netherlands r.l.pierce@tudelft.nl
Quet Mathieu IRD-IFRIS France mathieu.quet@gmail.com
Rafols Ismael University of Sussex Spain i.rafols@ingenio.upv.es
Randles Sally The University of Manchester UK Lisa.Gledhill@manchester.ac.uk
Reichow Aline University of Twente The Netherlands a.reichow@utwente.nl
Reynolds Jesse University of Tilburg The Netherlands j.l.reynolds@uvt.nl
Rezazadeh Yazdan CHEMICAL Iran Y.R@LNPchemical.COM
Rieder Gernot University of Vienna Austria gernot.rieder@univie.ac.at
Rietberg Evelien University of Twente The Netherlands e.rietberg@utwente.nl
Rip Arie University of Twente The Netherlands a.rip@utwente.nl
Robinson Douglas teQnode Limited France douglas.robinson@teqnode.com
Rommetveit Kjetil Rommetveit
University of Bergen Norway kjetil.rommetveit@svt.uib.no
Roure Francoice Ministry Economy Finance France yannick.guillaumot@finances.gouv.fr
Ruivenkamp Martin Radboud University The Netherlands m.ruivenkamp@science.ru.nl
Ruggiu Daniele University of Padova Italy daniele.ruggiu@unipd.it
Saidi Trust Maastricht University Zimbabwe tsaidi@student.maastrichtuniversity.nl
van der Scheer Lieke University of Twente The Netherlands Lieke.vanderScheer@utwente.nl
Schumann Simone University of Vienna Austria s.schumann@aon.at
29
Schuurbiers Daan De Proeffabriek The Netherlands daan@proeffabriek.nl
Schwarz Claudia University of Vienna Austria claudia.g.schwarz@gmail.com
Schwarz Astrid Friedrich Schiller University Jena Germany schwarz@phil.tu-darmstadt.de
Seifert Franz University Vienna Austria fseifert@gmx.at
Sekhsaria Pankaj Maastricht University The Netherlands psekhsaria@gmail.com
Shapira Philip The University of Manchester UK Lisa.Gledhill@manchester.ac.uk
Shelley-Egan Clare University of Twente The Netherlands c.shelleyegan@utwente.nl
Simakova Elena University Of Exeter Business School
England j.belcher@exeter.ac.uk
Simon Denis Arizona State University USA chinaprc@aol.com
Smith Robert Univerisity of Nottingham UK stxrdjs@nottingham.ac.uk
Spruit Shannon Delft University of Technology The Netherlands s.l.spruit@tudelft.nl
Stemerding Dirk Rathenau Instituut The Netherlands d.stemerding@rathenau.nl
Stocking Galen University of California Santa Barbara
USA gstocking@umail.ucsb.edu
Strand Roger University of Bergen Norway roger.strand@svt.uib.no
Swierstra Tsjalling Maastricht University The Netherlands t.swierstra@maastricht.net
Te Kulve Haico University of Twente The Netherlands h.tekulve@utwente.nl
Throne-Holst Harald SIFO - National institute for consumer research
Norway harald.throne-holst@sifo.no
Tokamanis Christos European Commission Belgium Christos.tokamanis@ec.europa.eu
Ulnicane Inga University of Twente the Netherlands i.ulnicane-ozolina@utwente.nl
Vaage Nora University of Bergen Norway nora.vaage@svt.uib.no
van de Poel Ibo Tu Delft, TBM, Philosophy The Netherlands i.r.vandepoel@tudelft.nl
van der Drift Mijke Maastricht University The Netherlands mijke.vanderdrift@maastrichtuniversity.nl
van Lente Harro Utrecht University The Netherlands h.vanlente@uu.nl
van Mensvoort Koert Next Nature Network The Netherlands mensvoort@nextnature.net
Veldman-Klos Annelies University of Twente The Netherlands a.veldman-klos
Villa Vazquez Laura Liliana
Universidad Autonoma de Zacatecas
Mexico laura_lilianavilla@yahoo.com.mx
von Schomberg Rene European Commission Belgium rene.vonschomberg@hotmail.com
Walhout Bart University of Twente The Netherlands a.m.walhout@utwente.nl
Wang Lili Maastricht University The Netherlands wang@merit.unu.edu
Weckert John Charles Sturt University Australia jweckert@csu.edu.au
Wetmore Jameson Arizona State University USA Jameson.Wetmore@asu.edu
Wickson Fern GenØk Centre for Biosafety Norway fern.wickson@genok.org
Youtie Jan Georgia Institute of Technology USA jan.youtie@innovate.gatech.edu
Zayago Lau Edgar Universidad Autonoma de Zacatecas
Mexico zayagolau@gmail.com
30
Rest
aura
nt su
gges
tions
Ensc
hede
31
Heng
elo
32
Map
Cam
pus U
nive
rsity
of T
wen
te
University of TwenteInstitute for Innovation and Governance StudiesDrienerlolaan 57522 NB EnschedeThe Netherlands
P.O. Box 2177500 AE EnschedeThe Netherlands
P +31 (0)53 489 3423F +31 (0)53 489 2159 info@igs.utwente.nl
www.utwente.nl/igs
INSTITUTE FOR NANOTECHNOLOGY
MESA+INSTITUTE FOR INNOVATION AND GOVERNANCE STUDIES
IGS