Prof. Nicola Rosato Dr. Massimo Bottini. 1.Nanotechnology, nanodrugs and carbon nanotubes 2.Bionano...

Post on 26-Mar-2015

214 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of Prof. Nicola Rosato Dr. Massimo Bottini. 1.Nanotechnology, nanodrugs and carbon nanotubes 2.Bionano...

Prof. Nicola Rosato

Dr. Massimo Bottini

1. Nanotechnology, nanodrugs and carbon nanotubes

2. “Bionano” research lines: the past

3. “Bionano” research lines: the present

4. “Bionano” research lines: nanodrugs for intratumor Treg targeting

5. “Bionano” research lines: the future

6. Conclusions

7. Acknowledgments

“Bionano” research lines

2NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

3NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

“Bionano” research lines

The science of manipulating matter at the atomic and molecular level to obtain The science of manipulating matter at the atomic and molecular level to obtain materials with specifically enhanced chemical and physical properties.materials with specifically enhanced chemical and physical properties.

Information Technology

Energy

Medicine

Consumer Goods

• Smaller, faster, more energy efficient and powerful computing and other IT-based systems

• More efficient and cost effective technologies for energy production− Solar cells− Fuel cells− Batteries− Bio fuels

• Foods and beverages− Advanced packaging materials,

sensors, and lab-on-chips for food quality testing

• Appliances and textiles− Stain proof, water proof and wrinkle

free textiles• Household and cosmetics

− Self-cleaning and scratch free products, paints, and better cosmetics

• Cancer treatment• Bone treatment• Drug delivery• Appetite control• Drug development• Medical tools• Diagnostic tests• Imaging

4

“Bionano” research lines

NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

5NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

“Bionano” research lines

6

“Bionano” research lines

NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

7NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

“Bionano” research lines

8

“Bionano” research lines

NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

9

“Bionano” research lines

NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

10

“Bionano” research lines

NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

11NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

“Bionano” research lines

12

“Bionano” research lines

NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

Protein corona of PEG-modified carbon nanotubes

Biodegradation of PEG-modified carbon nanotubes

13

“Bionano” research lines

NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

Biocompatibility of PEG-modified carbon nanotubes

Intratumor Treg targeting by PEG-modified carbon nanotubes

14NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

“Bionano” research lines

CD4+CD25highFoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) are harnessed by tumors to protect themselves from host anti-tumor responses.

15

Spleen (healthy) Spleen (tumor) Tumor

Immune cell relative abundance

NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

“Bionano” research lines

16

The manipulation of Treg function selectively into tumors might be the next frontier of cancer immunotherapy.

= carbon nanotube

= PEG

= monoclonal antibody

= cargo

= fluorochromeRegulatory T cellCD25

TCR/CD3

CD4

PEG-modified carbon nanotubes

RES

Tumor

“Bionano” research lines

NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

17

= SWCNT

= PEG

= targeting agent

= fluorochrome

= Treg-specific receptor

Spleen

Tumor

Length (nm)

0 100 200 300

Fre

qu

ency

(%

)

0

10

20

30

40 10141 nm

“Bionano” research lines

NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

18

Spleen(healthy)

Spleen(tumor)

Tumor

GITR FR4 CD39 CD103

“Bionano” research lines

NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

19

Effect of number of DTA-1 mAb/SWCNT

Tar

get

ing

eff

icie

ncy

(%

)

0102030405060

100pM300pM1nM

100pM300pM1nM

100pM300pM1nM

0 5

Unst.

Teff

Treg

DTA-1/SWCNT

*

* *

*

Effect of dose Effect of incubation time

Tar

get

ing

eff

icie

ncy

(%

)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60 01 5

Unst.T regT eff

10

# mAbs

*

*

*

Ta

rge

tin

g e

ffic

ien

cy

(%)

0102030405060

1h1+5h6h

1h1+5h6h

1h1+5h6h

0 5

Unst.

Teff

Treg

DTA-1/SWCNT

* *

** *

DTA-1/SWCNT

Tar

get

ing

sel

ecti

vity

0

4

8

12

16 100pM300pM1nM

100pM300pM1nM

0 5

Treg:Unst.

Treg:Teff

* *

*

Ta

rge

tin

g s

ele

ctiv

ity

0

4

8

12

16

T reg:Unst.

T reg:T eff

01 510

# mAbs* ** *

* *

DTA-1/SWCNT

Ta

rge

tin

g s

ele

cti

vit

y

0

4

8

12

16 1h1+5h6h

1h1+5h6h

0 5

Treg:Unst.

Treg:Teff

* *

*

“Bionano” research lines

NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

20

1 hour 1 hour + 5 hours 6 hours

NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

“Bionano” research lines

21

Anti-FR4 mAb

Tar

get

ing

eff

icie

ncy

(%

)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60 01 5

Unst.T regT eff

10

# mAbs

**

Tar

get

ing

eff

icie

ncy

(%

)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60 01 5

Unst.T regT eff

10

# mAbs*

Anti-CD39 mAb Anti-CD103 mAb

Tar

get

ing

eff

icie

ncy

(%

)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60 01 5

Unst.T regT eff

10

# mAbs

*

*

*

Ta

rge

tin

g s

ele

ctiv

ity

0

4

8

12

16

T reg:Unst.

T reg:T eff

01 510

# mAbs* *

Ta

rge

tin

g s

ele

cti

vit

y

0

4

8

12

16

T reg:Unst.

T reg:T eff

01 510

# mAbs

* *

*

Ta

rge

tin

g s

ele

cti

vit

y

0

4

8

12

16

T reg:Unst.

T reg:T eff

01 510

# mAbs

* *

*

**

“Bionano” research lines

NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

22

Ta

rge

tin

g e

ffic

ien

cy

(%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60 01 5

GITRCD39

FR4

10

# mAbs*

*

Treg targeting efficiency vs. receptor

Tar

get

ing

sel

ecti

vity

0

4

8

12

16 01 5

GITRCD39

FR4

10

# mAbs**

Tar

get

ing

sel

ecti

vity

0

4

8

12

16 01 5

GITRCD39

FR4

10

# mAbs**

Treg vs. Unstained Treg vs. Teff

Treg targeting selectivity vs. receptor

NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

“Bionano” research lines

23

Time (h)0 2 4 6 8

Blo

od

co

nc

. (

g m

L-1

)

0

5

10

15 HealthyB16-bearing

Pharmacokinetic profile

Ta

rge

tin

g e

ffic

ien

cy

(%)

02468

10121416 Unst.

Teff Treg

no mAb

DTA-1

anti-HA

**

Targeting efficiency (spleen of healthy mice)

Tar

get

ing

eff

icie

ncy

(%

)

02468

10121416 Unst.

Teff Treg

Tumor

Spleen

*

Targeting efficiency (B16-bearing mice)

“Bionano” research lines

NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

24NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

“Bionano” research lines

25

“Bionano” research lines

NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

Aim 1. Assess tumor killing elicited by PNT-DTA1. We will assess attenuation of intra-tumor Treg function and efficient tumor-killing by PNT-DTA1 systemically administered to B16-bearing mice.

Aim 2. Assess increased intra-tumor delivery of PNT-DTA1 elicited by co-administered iRGD peptides. We will assess whether co-administration of PNT-DTA1 with iRGD peptides leads to a tumor-specific increase in nanoparticle accumulation and Treg targeting, and more efficient tumor killing in B16-bearing mice.

26

“Bionano” research lines

NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

2,5ug 5ug 10ug

27

Treg-targeting efficiency and selectivity of PEG-SWCNT-DTA1 depend on number of ligands per nanotube, incubation time, dose, and targeted surface marker.

PEG-SWCNT-DTA were internalized by Treg through receptor-mediated endocytosis and transported into the cytoplasm and nucleus ex vivo and in vivo.

Injection of PEG-SWCNT-DTA1 in animals carrying tumors enabled very good targeting of T reg residing in the tumor microenvironment, while much less efficiency and almost no selectivity was evident in the spleen.

Preferential penetration of nanoparticles into the tumor microenvironment compared to other tissues ( i.e. spleen) was a consequence of 1.EPR effect2.naturally increased intra-tumor Treg vs. Teff ratio 3.use of markers that are enriched in intra-tumor vs. peripheral Treg (i.e. GITR)

“Bionano” research lines

NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

PEG-SWCNTs were degraded by activated neutrophils in approximately 3 hours

Prof. E. Ruoslahti

Prof. N. Bottini’s Lab Prof. A. Magrini

Prof. M. Mattei

Dr. A. Pietroiusti

Dr. L. Campagnolo

NovellaMassimo Cristiano

Arthritis National Research Foundation

28

“Bionano” research lines

NAST Workshop, July 3, 2013, Rome

Prof. B. Fadeel

Prof. A. Star

The Prof.