Post on 03-Jan-2016
Principals ManagementDevelopment Programme (PMDP)
Progress Report, January 2011
PMDP Rollout Progress Report January 2011.ppt
1. Highlights
Rollout schools (197)
achieve average improvement of
15,8% in Grade 12results in 2010
Schools with <20%Grade 12 pass rateimprove by 32,0%
in 2010
PMDPcosts per participantreduced to R16,943
in 2010
Pilot schools achieve21.3% improvement
in Grade 12 pass ratein 2009 & 2010
78,0% of RolloutSchools improve their
results in 2010
2
PMDP Rollout Progress Report January 2011.ppt
2. Programme Objectives
• To rapidly upgrade the management skills of principals in selected schools in KZN through a highly applied methodology
• To strengthen the working relationships between the three critical layers in the functioning of a school (Ward Manager; Principal & SMT)
• To improve the support and coaching skills of Ward Managers and other DoE officials
• To develop sustainable professional learning communities
• To build a private/public funding and delivery model
3
The Honorable MEC of KZN Education Mr. E. S. Mchunu
PMDP Rollout Progress Report January 2011.ppt
3. College Training Methodology
4
‘College Training’ On-Site Coaching
Cluster of 20 principals with 2Ward Managers
24 Deliverablesfor Principals
6 Deliverables for Ward Managers.
One module per month
Friday / Saturday
Outputs
Signed Off byCoaches
One-on-onecoaching ofprincipal at
school
2 Hours per month
Weekdays
Modules:• Direction & Planning• School Governance• Curriculum Management • Resource Acquisition & Management• Financial Management• People Management
PMDP Rollout Progress Report January 2011.ppt
16x Trainer Coaches
4. Project Governance and Delivery
Admin
Senior Support
Coaches
Joint Working
Committee
Quality
Assurance UKZN
Project
Managers
5
DOE/Consortium
Steering Committee
EHRD staff
PMDP Rollout Progress Report January 2011.ppt
5. Scope of Programme
6
PMDP ROLLOUT SCOPE 2010-2012
Year Schools Ward Managers % Schools Covered % Ward Managers
2009 50 6 1,0% 3,0%
2010 567 61 10,0% 31,5%
2011 600 60 9,0% 28,5%
2012 600 60 9,5% 30,0%
TOTAL 1817 187 29,5% 97,0%
Focus:
• Rural areas 80,0%
• Quintiles 1&2 90,0%
• Primary Schools 60,0%
PMDP Rollout Progress Report January 2011.ppt
6. Participating Schools Data
7
100
90
60
50
30
0
40
20
10
80
70
Male
Per
cent
ge
Female
Principals: Gender
44%
56%
100
90
60
50
30
0
40
20
10
80
70
Electricty
Per
cent
ge
School Infrastructure
73%
36%
Water
Male
Per
cent
ge
Ward Managers: Gender
Female
100
90
60
50
30
0
40
20
10
80
7072%
28%
1 and 2
Per
cent
ge
Quintiles: Participating Schools
86%
14%
3 and above
100
90
60
50
30
0
40
20
10
80
70
PMDP Rollout Progress Report January 2011.ppt
7. Participant Evaluation
• Q1 – Relevant of material Q3 – Confidence to implement• Q2 – Session alive and interesting Q4 – Rate the facilitator• Q5 - Quality of coaching sessions
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
Ra
ting
Q1: RelevanceQ2: Lively & interesting
Q3: Confidence toimplement
Q4: Quality offacilitation
Q5: Quality ofcoaching
Overall
8
PMDP Rollout Progress Report January 2011.ppt 9
I would like to thank the Department of Education for introducing us to such a
programme. It will be of great benefit especially to the newly appointed
principals who still have far to go, as well as to the older principals. It has
seriously impacted in my management practice, especially with regard to my
SMT and SGB…
Principal, Obisini Primary, Pomeroy Ward
I view PMDP as a ship that has been designed to rescue the sinking schools.
Frankly the programme was tailored to develop and empower principals with
sound knowledge and skills to be proficient to all areas where we do not
implement or put in to good practice the theories of Leadership and
Management. This programme has a distinct difference to any other
programmes ever presented because it is conducted by knowledgeable
facilitators …
Principal, Landelani Primary, Pomeroy
8. Comments by Participants
PMDP Rollout Progress Report January 2011.ppt 10
The programme is impacting positively in schools as principals are realizing
the benefits of working together with all stakeholders, the policies of the
Department which have been accumulating dust in the principals office are
being dusted and put to use. What excites me is the reflection in the form of
outputs which takes place after each and every module... I recommend that all
principals need to be developed in this programme including ward managers.
Ms DND Ndlovu, SEM, Nkande Ward
The project is excellent. It is “capacitative”. After attending it, you are born
again as a school manager. It has made a remarkable impact in my
management practices. For instance I have developed a number of
documents / policies as a result of this project. Exciting areas are SGB
improvement plan, Curriculum Management Tracker and Management of
assets. I wish all school managers should be involved in this project because
it is developmental in the nature. It is indispensable if we are serious about
proper school management.
MB Xulu, Mabuthela High School, Mzumbe Ward
9. Comments by Participants (cont.)
PMDP Rollout Progress Report January 2011.ppt
10. Quality Assurance
2009 Moderators Report
• The moderators were impressed that in a short period, managers acquired those essential management skills needed to succeed. It was pleasing to note that the majority of candidates completed their tasks given the challenges faced in school during this part of the year.
• We are confident that if the course learning is internalized, made meaning of and applied in practice in the school, then real transformation of schools will take place
11
Moderation Team
Imitiaz Saib Independent
Mzamo Mhlambi KZN DoE
Pete Jugmohan UKZN
Neil Avery UKZN
Moderation Team
Imitiaz Saib Independent
Zonke Cele KZN DoE
Rashida Bobat KZN DoE
Pete Jugmohan UKZN
Neil Avery UKZN
2010 Moderators Report
• The vast majority of portfolios were of a commendable standard. It was evident that managers were able to develop a school policy, see the link between policy and practice, link their budgets to service delivery and develop a clear vision for their school in the context of the surrounding community.
• It was pleasing that candidates had completed their tasks despite the challenges faced by the schools during this part of the year…
PMDP Rollout Progress Report January 2011.ppt
11. Results
Grade SchoolsTarget
Improvement
Actual Improvement
2009 2010
12 50 Pilot schools 5,0% 12,0% 9,0%
12 567 Rollout schools 5,0% - 15,8%
3&6 All schools 5,0% * *
* No standardization/comparability
12
Key Performance Indicators Target 2009 2010
• SMT’s and SGB’s functioning effectively in each school 90% 91% 95%
• Principals and Ward Managers complete all Outputs 90% 95% 92%
• PMDP Attendance 90% 98% 88%*
• Participating Primary Schools to write DoE standardised Literacy &Numeracy Assessments
90% 100% **
• Affected by Industrial Action in public sector** Assessments not conducted in 2010 due to curriculum changes
PMDP Rollout Progress Report January 2011.ppt
12. Grade 12 Results by District – Rollout Schools 2010
13
District 2009 2010 Improve Schools up
Amajuba 55,4 63,9 9,0% 11,1%
Empangeni 37,5 50,3 14,0% 26,0%
Ilembe 27,6 51,1 24,0% 6,7%
Obonjeni 33,9 56,3 22,0% 20,0%
Othukela 61,0 76,0 15,0% 66,7%
Pinetown 42,3 56,0 14,0% 42,8%
Sisonke 47,1 64,1 17,0% 16,7%
Ugu 39,8 66,3 27,0% 12,5%
Umgungundlovu 46,9 63,2 16,0% 21,4%
Umlazi 50,3 54,1 4,0% 46,7%
Umzinyathi 55,8 69,7 14,0% 28,6%
Vryheid 64,7 61,8 -3,0% 36,3%
Below 20% schools 13,5 45,5 32,0% 92,3%
PMDP Rollout Progress Report January 2011.ppt
13. Sustainability Indicators
Target 2009 Pilot 2010 Rollout
Learning Networks established 60% 100% 67%
Use of Curriculum Management Tracker 60% 100% 100%
All Outputs sustained 60% 68% *
Learner improvement 5% 5% *
14
* Will be assessed in 2011
PMDP Rollout Progress Report January 2011.ppt