Basic principles of Latvian competition law

Plan

1. Principles, aims and history of competition law

2. Competition Council and its powers

3. Prohibited Agreements

4. When the agreement is prohibited

5. Liability

6. Amendments to the Competition Law

2

Part one: General

• Principles, aims and history of competition law

• Some basic concepts

3

…

Adam Smith (1723 – 1790), philosopher and political economist

• Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776).

“People of the same trade seldom meet together, .. But the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices."

4

Competition law in Latvia?

• 90s – The goal is to join the EC

• 1999 – First try

• 2002 – The new law

• Why Europe needs competition law?

5

Objectives

• Promotion of competition in the market -• Ensuring independent activity of each market participant

• Restricting the creation or abuse of the market power

•Aims:• lower prices

• better quality

• Broader choice

• More innovations

6

Pillars of competition law

1. Prohibition of anti competitive agreements

2. Prohibition of abuse of the dominant position

3. Merger control

4. Control of state aid

7

Applicable laws and other sources

• EU law

• Latvian laws:• Competition Law (in force since January 2002)

• Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers

8

Market participants

• Any natural or legal person• Legal persons: whole group

• Also self-employed, individual merchants

• Associations of market participants

• Criteria:• Is engaged or is preparing to engage in the economic

activities in Latvia

• Economic activities: any sales of goods/provision of anyservices (except for public services)

9

Relevant market

• Purpose of relevant market definition • to identify the competitors, consumers, customers of the

respective market participants

• to determine the boundaries within which the market participants are competing or are situated in circumstances where they can compete

• Definition of the relevant market. Two Pillars:• Product market

• Geographic market

10

Product market

• Substitution

• Demand

• Supply

• Barriers

• Key: “specific features of the product and its utilisation characteristics”

11

Geographic market

• Substitution

• Barriers

• Imports

• Key: “appreciably different conditions”

12

Part two: Competition authorities

• Structure

• Rights (obligations)?

13

What’s in its name?

• Competition Council = Konkurences padome

• www.kp.gov.lv

• Chairperson of the Council Ms. Ieva Jaunzeme

• Executive body - the Bureau

14

What do they do?

• Investigations and market studies

• Breach cases

• Mergers

• New laws: review/opinions

15

Powers – general overview

• Information request • For a very wide range of objectives• The necessary information including the commercial

secret

• Rights are very wide

• Limitations to the rights - there are no direct norms of the law

• Procedural preconditions - powers of attorneys, court decisions

• Forced enforcement, money fines

16

Dawn raids

• Broad powers of investigation

• The inspection may take place with or without prior warning

• The inspections without warning are called "dawn raids"

• Only the powers stipulated by the law• European Commission - Regulation No 1/2003• Competition Council - Competition Law (new since 2002)

• Little practice at application of the law

17

Documents to be presented

• Power of attorney

• ID

• Court decision

• Decision of the head of the bureau

18

Powers of the CC during dawn raids

• Access to the company and employees' premises/property (including transport vehicles)

• Rights to open storage facilities • Examination of the company and its employees' property• Rights to demand explanations• Receive copies, remove originals/property• Seal the premises, transport vehicles, storehouses

19

When they come – what to do?

• To think of:

• Your lawyer (whatever time of the day)

• What you have done/written

• Fines

• Cooperate

• Be polite but strict. Keep the investigation under control

• Set up a team for representation of the company at the investigation

• Inform all the employees

• Keep precise copies of the information acquired by the investigators

• Accompany the investigators continuously

• Put down the questions and answers

20

Rights of the company during the raid

• Rights in relation to the protected information: • "confidentiality" mark

• Limits of the investigated case

• "Legal privilege" or the confidentiality of the lawyer's correspondence

21

Part three: Agreements

• The rule

• „Agreement”

• Prohibited agreements –black list

• Horizontal and vertical agreements

22

The rule

•Agreements with an object or effect of hindrance, restriction or distortion of competition in the territory of Latvia are prohibited and void from the moment of conclusion between market participants

• Principle of invalidity of the agreement

• Object or effect?

• Agreement

23

Hindrance, Restriction or Distortion of Competition

•Test:•Object or effect?

• It is enough that competition can be potentially hindered, restricted or distorted

•"Affected market"•Horizontal/Vertical•Relevant product market• Relevant geographical market

24

Agreement I

• “Traditional” agreement• It does not have to be a written document

• Does not have to be binding (also gentlemen's agreement)

• Does not have to be fulfilled

• But has to be concluded between "independent entities" (that is, does notrelate to mutual agreements between parent and subsidiary companies)

25

Agreement II

• Decisions of associations of undertakings:

• Recommendations, common standards, models of action

• The form and legal consequences bear no significance, theparticipant’s attitude towards such decisions is important

• Concerted practices:

• Without arrangement - the market participants does not inform eachother about their activities

• Type of company coordination, which - wihthout knowingly set out ina form of an agreement, threatens the competition, includes practicalcooperation of companies

26

Prohibited agreements - "black list"

• Agreements, which:• Directly or indirectly fix prices for purchase or sale, or any other

trading conditions;• Restrict or control production, markets, technical development, or

investments;• Divides markets or sources of supply;• Applies unequal provisions in equivalent transactions with third

persons, creating for them disadvantageous conditions in terms of competition;

• Make the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations which by their nature or according to commercial usage have no connection with the subject of such contracts.

27

Exchange of information

• European Commission in case of IFTRA Rules on Glass Containers:

• It is contrary to provisions of Article 81 that the producercontacts his competitors in relation to significantelements of his price policy, for example, pricelists,discounts and sale conditions applied by him, rates anddates, when they are changed, and special exceptions,which he can award to specific clients

28

Is "information" illegal?

• Life in information vacuum?

• Operation in full independence from competitors?

• Special case - oligopoly [for example, fuel market]

29

Agreements on Prices

• Nintendo case

• Vitamin Cartel

30

Market and/or client division

• Purpose of market and/or customer division is to provide the members of a cartel with a possibility to maintain an artificially dominant or even monopoly position in a definite geographical territory.

31

Other examples

• "The distributor undertakes to purchase Goods only form theProducer"

• "Within the premises of the Distributor, only the Producer's goodsare allowed for sale"

• "Opening of every new sales place by the Distributor shall becoordinated with the Producer"

• "The Parties have agreed that the Distributor shall be the exclusivedistributor of the Producer in the Territory"

• "During the term of this Agreement the Seller will not involve inactive sale of Goods within the Territory"

• Appendix XXX to the agreement between YYY and ZZZ “retail price”

32

Horizontal and vertical agreements

• Horizontal agreements:• An aggrement is concluded or concerted practices are

practiced between companies, which are active in the same level of the market [competitors]

• Vertical agreement:• Agreements which are concluded between companies

which are active in various levels of production or supply chain

33

Vertical agreements

• The competition may be limited:

• among various brands (inter-brand competition) or

• competition between the distributors of goods of one and the same brand (inter-brand competition).

• Most harmful agreements to the competition are those agreements which influence the inter-brand competition, rather than between the distributors.

• However, limitations to the intra-brand competition can be harmful in case the inter-brand competition is limited at the same time.

34

Horizontal agreements

• Members of a cartel engage in cartels in order to be able to rely on their existing market share, on the existing clients and they do not need to offer new or better products for competitive prices. Accordingly, the consumer loses because he pays more for goods of worse quality.

• Price fixing if it is only a purpose or recommendation influences thecompetition because as a result of such decision, all participants canforesee with a reasonable degree of certainty what price policy will beadopted by their competitors, especially if the fixing of a target price isaccompanied by a possibility of control and sanction.

35

Part four: when the agreement is prohibited

• Exemptions from the prohibition

• De minimis

36

Exemptions

• Agreement may be allowed or allowed on conditions for a definiteterm if

• the agreement promotes improvement of goods production orsale, or the economic progress and therefore

• ensures benefit for the consumer, besides

• these agreements do not impose limitations to the respectivemarket participants, which are not necessary for reachingthese aims and

• avoids the possibility to eliminate competition in a significantrelevant market share.

37

De minimis

• Agreements which cannot significantly harm the competition:• Agreements between companies which operate in one

level of manufacture or distribution (horizontalagreement) if the joint market share of the both/allparties in the relevant market does not exceed 10%

• Agreements between companies which operate indifferent levels of manufacture or distribution (verticalagreement) if the market share of the contracting party inthe relevant market does not exceed 15%

38

Part five: Liability

• Penalties

• Leniency

39

Penalties

•Competitors – 10%

•Non-competitors – 5%

•Civil liability

40

Leniency

• What is leniency policy?• Allows the company to cooperate with the authority during the

or even to initiate it• “Whistle-blowers" L

• Aim – destabilization of cartels

• Consequences:• Reduction of/exemption from penalty

• Does not influence the civil liability

41

Part six: Amendments

• History

• Process

• Result

• Consequences

42

Just to reiterate….

• History

• Process

43

Part 2 of Clause 13

• A market participant or several market participants are in adominant position in retail, if:• they, taking into account their buyer power and dependence ofthe suppliers in the relevant market,

• have the capacity to directly or indirectly apply or impose unfairand unjustified provisions, conditions, or payments upon thesuppliers, and

• have the capacity to hinder, restrict or distort competition in anyrelevant market within the territory of Latvia for a substantiallength of time.

44

Prohibition

• Any market participant holding a dominant position in retail is prohibited from abusing such position in the territory of Latvia.

45

Abuse I

• imposition or application of unfair and unjustified provisions regarding the return of the goods, unless the returned goods are: • Goods of bad quality,

• New goods, which were not previously known to the consumers provided that the increased supplies thereof were initiated by the supplier

46

Abuse II

• imposition or application of unfair and unjustified payments for thepresence of the delivered goods at a retail sales point, unless suchpayments are justifiable as marketing costs for new products, whichwere not previously known to the consumers;

47

Abuse III

• imposition or application of unfair and unjustified payments inexchange for entering into a contract, unless such payments arejustifiable as costs for entering into a contract with a new supplier,which therefore requires special evaluation;

48

Abuse IV

• imposition or application of unfair and unjustified payments inexchange for delivery of goods to a new, yet-to-be-opened retailpoint of sale;

49

Abuse V

• imposition or application of unfair and unjustifiably long paymentperiods for delivered goods.

50

Abuse VI

• imposition or application of unfair and unjustifiable sanctions for thebreach of the agreement.

51

Consequences / conclusions

• It depends….

52

Thank you!Jūlija JerņevaMob: +371 29131597https://www.linkedin.com/in/julijajerneva