Post on 02-Aug-2020
1
2
3
4
District score is the average composite score weighted by
the number of students
included in each matrix level.
5
Criteria increased.
6
Graduation Rate AMO
• 74.1% for each subgroup
• No minimum subgroup size for graduation rate
7
11 demographic categories
6 cells per category
Grade comes from table of 66 cells
= X
“Easily understood” letter grade for schools or districts under ESEA Waiver
6 cells per category
2 cells percent tested
= +
4 cells either average ≥ AMO or average > average for prior year’s students
Assign values of 1 = Met 0 = Not met .1 to .9 = Partial credit
Sum columns Multiply by weights Sum weighted column totals Compute weighted average of elementary, middle, & high Look up grade` in table 8
-0.3 -2.3 -3.5 -3.2 10 10
10 Sum weighted points across bottom line
11 -2.3 -0.3 -3.5 -3.15 Points lost by subject
-3.2 -6.4 -1.8 -0.9 12 Points lost by subject
13 7.5 7.5
-9.0 14 Points lost for graduation rate
-9.0 -2.3 -0.5 -1.0 -0.5 15
12,050 12,560
13,222 13,675
14,412 15,234
15,822 16,351
16,829 17,268
17,829 18,230
18,688 19,091
19,705 20,458
21,228 21,755
22,097 22,367 22,936
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
Lexington One Enrollment 1993 to 2013
Source: 135-day Audited Average Daily Membership
16
17
Poverty Index =
𝑵𝒑
𝑬𝒅
where Np = unduplicated count of students who are receive free/reduced meals or Medicaid services and where Ed = enrollment on date when the file was created.
Source: Office of Research and Statistics, SC Budget and Control Board
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
York 4 Lexington 5 York 2 Lexington 1 Richland 2 Anderson 1 Dorchester 2
Poverty Indices for 7 Districts with Lowest Poverty Indices 2002-2012
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
18
79.0% 77.0%
74.8%
54.3%
76.7% 75.8% 78.6%
56.6%
88.7%
73.5%
82.5%
74.8%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3
Percent of Lexington One Students Meeting Dominie Reading Goals for 2011, 2012, 2013
2010 2011 2013 19
58% 59% 57%
61% 59%
57%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
Percent of Lexington One Students Meeting Virtual Comparison Group Targets
on Measures of Academic Progress
Reading Mathematics 20
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
3 SP13 4 SP13 5 SP12 SP13 6 SP13 7 SP13 8 SP12 SP13
PASS Writing Comparison 2012-2013
Ex5
Ex4
Met
NM2
NM1
21
> 45% Ex
<15% NM
District Goals
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
3 SP12 SP13 4 SP12 SP13 5 SP12 SP13 6 SP12 SP13 7 SP12 SP13 8 SP12 SP13
PASS ELA Comparison 2012-2013
Ex5
Ex4
Met
NM2
NM1
22
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
3 SP12 SP13 4 SP12 SP13 5 SP12 SP13 6 SP12 SP13 7 SP12 SP13 8 SP12 SP13
PASS Math Comparison 2012-2013
Ex5
Ex4
Met
NM2
NM1
23
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
3 SP12 SP13 4 SP12 SP13 5 SP12 SP13 6 SP12 SP13 7 SP12 SP13 8 SP12 SP13
PASS Science Comparison 2012-2013
Ex5
Ex4
Met
NM2
NM1
24
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
3 SP12 SP13 4 SP12 SP13 5 SP12 SP13 6 SP12 SP13 7 SP12 SP13 8 SP12 SP13
PASS Social Studies Comparison 2012-2013
Ex5
Ex4
Met
NM2
NM1
25
• Dropout rate is annual rate of students who leave the school or district for any reason, other than death, prior to graduation or completion of a course of studies without transferring to another school district or institution, divided by the total number of students enrolled at the school.
• GED students do not count as dropouts.
26
Dropout rate ≠ graduation rate
Four-year adjusted cohort graduation rate
27
Most rigorous and accurate method
Required by USDE and NGA
Tracks all students who began in Grade 9
Add students who transfer in
Remove students if adequate documentation Transfer out, death, emigration
Includes summer graduates
GED students count as non-graduates.
Four-year on-time graduation rate
28
2011 2012 2013
Four-year
graduates 1332 1385 1343
Students 1586 1651 1599
On-time
graduation
rate
84.0% 83.9% 83.9%
S.C. Rate
74.1%
Goal
85% AMO
79.6%
90.3 89.9 87.8 89.0
92.3 92.1 90.8 88.5
94.5 92.1
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
ELA 2+ Math 2+
HSAP Accountability Summary for Lexington One for 2009-2013
Students Scoring 2 and Above
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
2013 HSAP 90.6%
Passed both
29
59.6
67.6
60.6
64.9
70.8 67.4
64.0 66.4
73.7
66.5
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
ELA 3+ Math 3+
HSAP Accountability Summary for Lexington One for 2009-2013
Students Scoring 3 and Above
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
30
92.0 91.3 90.9
81.6 81.0 84.0 85.1
83.4 85.9
66.0 66.9
75.6
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013
Algebra I Algebra I Algebra I English I English I English I Biology Biology Biology US History US History US History
EOCEP Percent Passing for Students in Lexington One 2011-2013
31
64%
60% 57%
28%
35%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
Percent of Students Who Met Standard on State Technology Test for Grade 8
Lexington 1 SC 32
71.9%
51.8%
66.2%
60.60%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Senior Project Capstone Projects Completed Major
Percent of Lexington One Seniors Who Passed Senior Projects or Completed Majors in 2011-12 and 2012-13
2011-12
2012-13
Op
tio
nal
Yea
r-lo
ng
Pro
ject
33
99.8%
94.1%
99.1%
95.5%
99.6% 97.6%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Highly Qualified Teachers TOPA
Percent of Lexington One Teachers Who Were Highly Qualified or Met Technology Online Proficiency Assessment Requirement
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
34
ADDITIONAL INDICATORS
35
1016
1141
1091 1098
1181
686
784
740 740
825
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13
Advanced Placement Tests Number of Total Attempts and Number Scoring 3 or Higher
Lexington One Students 2008-09 to 2012-13
TESTS 3 OR HIGHER36
67.5% 68.7% 67.8% 67.4% 69.9%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-12 2012-13
Percent of Lexington One students scoring 3 or higher on AP exams 2008-09 through 2012-2013
37
1436 1431 1436
1500 1498 1498 1500 1490 1503
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
2011 (817 students) 2012 (869) students 2013 (817)
Mean Total Verbal, Writing, and Math SAT Scores (Recomputed for comparability with 2011 methodology change)
STATE NATION LEX. 138
39
20.1 20.2 20.4
21.1 21.1 20.9
22.2 22.1 21.9
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2010-2011(600 students) 2011-2012(688 students) 2012-2013 (676 students)
Mean Composite ACT Scores for State, Nation, and District
State Nation Lexington One
50% probability of making at least B and
75% probability of making at least C on related college course
676 Lexington One students from Class of 2013 chose to take ACT
Self-selected sample
Benchmark +1
Benchmark -1
40
65%
33%
45%
24%
16%
64%
33%
44%
26%
17%
71%
37%
48%
29%
21%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
English Math Reading Science Met All 4
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
Me
eti
ng
Benchmark
Plan Benchmark Performance 2010-2012
2010 2011 2012
41
64%
38%
43%
21%
16%
64%
33%
45%
17%
13%
63%
39%
43%
21%
17%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
English Math Reading Science All 4
Pe
cen
t o
f St
ud
en
ts M
ee
tin
g
Benchmark
Explore Benchmark Performance 2010-2012
2010 2011 2012
42
Lexington One does well in national comparisons.
43
Nationally normed assessments
ACT, Plan, Explore
SAT, PSAT
MAP
Lexington One does well in national comparisons, but...
44
PASS, HSAP, & EOCEP — ONLY in South Carolina
Any national comparison based solely on PASS, HSAP or EOCEP cannot be technically adequate.
ESEA Waivers for AYP have added to confusion about comparability among states.
ESEA Waiver criteria increase annually.
State accountability system criteria are more stable than ESEA Waiver criteria.
Challenges Remain
45
Providing for increasing population
with increasing poverty
and closing achievement gaps
for subgroups
while
continuing to innovate
46