Transcript of Policing Football Fans in Europe Case studies of the Euro 2000 and Euro 2004 football championships...
- Slide 1
- Policing Football Fans in Europe Case studies of the Euro 2000
and Euro 2004 football championships Prof. Dr. Otto M.J. Adang
http://policestudies.homestead.com
- Slide 2
- Adang (1990): Study into initiation and escalation of riots In
the Netherlands and during Euro 88 (Germany) Systematic and
structured observations Over 700 observation hours (around 71
football matches and 139 protest events) Quantitative analysis
- Slide 3
- Ethological observations Direct recording of observations
Limited number of well-defined behavioural categories Focus on
interaction Focal group Comparative approach
- Slide 4
- Research questions What happens: who uses violence, how many,
what type of violence, against whom, under what circumstances, what
response? What factors influence the initiation and escalation of
violence?
- Slide 5
- Main conclusions initiation of violence: frictions young male
syndrome escalation of violence: ingroup/ outgroup mechanisms
opportunity/ perception of risk normal social mechanisms are
operating, but influence of alcohol and drugs
- Slide 6
- Police can do a lot to prevent violence, but little to stop it
need to differentiate need to communicate need to observe need for
focused, timely interventions
- Slide 7
- A test: Adang & Cuvelier, 2001
- Slide 8
- 8 Amsterdam Rotterdam Arnhem Eindhoven Brussel Luik Charleroi
Brugge
- Slide 9
- Stated policy: police tactics non-confrontational: preventive
rather than repressive small units, easily approachable, actively
contacting fans early and focused interventions riot squads out of
sight
- Slide 10
- Stated policy: police behavioural profile Police officers: are
service oriented, respectful of other cultures/ nationalities and
unbiased are aware of the importance of information act within
policy, without prejudice act justly and strictly in a friendly and
firm way
- Slide 11
- Data collection International monitoring team (all host cities)
questionnaire (individually) summary of team observations Foreign
spotters teams questionnaire (individually) exit interview with
teams Observation team in each host city systematic observations
qualitative diaries
- Slide 12
- Results: two clusters, differing especially in: primarily
fullfilled preventive role treated visitors as guests were easily
approachable by fans switched flexibly clearly stated limits of
tolerance
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Public order management during Euro 2004: explicit choice for
low profile approach Adang & Stott
- Slide 16
- Data collection Euro 2004 Matches of England, Germany,
Netherlands, Portugal [and Albufeira] Interviews with police and
fans International monitoring team Observation teams (4 * 4) in
host cities: match days and preceding night samples every 15 min,
in between qualitative
- Slide 17
- 7 matches increased risk: 997 samples (England, Germany) 7
matches normal risk: 899 samples (Netherlands, Portugal)
Albufeira
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Note Extensive use of plainclothes officers Intervention units
out of sight but close Observations of potential incidents Presence
of hooligans
- Slide 28
- Conclusions Police strategy and tactics (low profile approach)
succesful and contributed to: Development of common football/ euro
2004 identity Empowerment of non-violence (self-policing among
fans) Contribution of international police cooperation banning
orders community policing approach to international
cooperation
- Slide 29
- International police cooperation: differences in approaches
CRIMINAL INTELLIGENCE/ INVESTIGATION APPROACH Focus on deterrence
and punishment Covert (no interaction with fans) Indirectly
influencing fan behaviour Focus on individuals/ prominents
COMMUNITY POLICING APPROACH Focus on public order management Open
(interaction with fans) Directly influencing fan behaviour Focus on
behaviour
- Slide 30
- Foreign police at work (Braga)
- Slide 31
- Strategic principles balance between risk and deployment
dynamic assessment of risk proactive communication facilitation
within limits differentiation
- Slide 32
- Trends in public order policing from riot control to public
order management increased international cooperation more
knowledge-based more systematic evaluations search for good
practice (what works) practice and training more informed by more
practically useful research