Post on 12-Jan-2016
description
21-04-23
Challenge the future
DelftUniversity ofTechnology
Social enterprise and hybridity in housing organisations in Europe: a response to financial and regulatory challenges?
Plenary 2:
International perspectives on social enterprise and hybridity in housing
organisations.
Darinka CZISCHKE, in collaboration with Prof. Vincent GRUIS
Dept of Real Estate & Housing, Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology (the Netherlands)
ENHR conference 2011, Toulouse, France
2Titel van de presentatie
The concept of social enterprise
• “…a business with primarily social objectives whose surpluses are
principally re-invested for that purpose in the business or the community,
rather than being driven by the need to maximise profits for shareholders
or owners” (DTI 2002)
• “…nor-for-profit private organisations providing goods or services directly
related to their explicit aim to benefit the community…” (Defourny et al
2008)
• “…organisations that have been designed as private enterprises, operating
in a market situation, that at the same time employ their means to fulfill a
societal objective that is interwoven with (or parallel to) the common
interests, that produces goods and services and that uses its profit entirely
for the realisation of its societal objective.” (NTMO 2003)
Wide variety of definitions:
3Titel van de presentatie
Social enterprises:
Source: Brandsen et al. (2005), based on Zijderveld (1999) and Pestoff (1992).
Between the State, Market and Society
4Titel van de presentatie
Social enterprises:Inherent hybrid nature
The Conceptual Classification Framework – The Social Economic Continuum for NI and NW ROI (Crossan, 2009)
5Titel van de presentatie
‘Public’ providers
‘Private’ providers
L.A. Public law
bodies
Private law entities (civil or business), non profit Coop For-profit Assoc Coop Companies/societies Other
Public owners
Private or mixed owners
AT * * * * *
BE * * *
DE * *
DK * * *
ES * *
FI * * * *
FR * * *
IE * * *
IT * * * *
NL * Found
PT * * NGOs *
UK * * * * * *
Source: Czischke, based on Bauer (2011)
Types of social housing providers in the EU
6Titel van de presentatie
Towards a typology of social enterprise in social housing in the EU
Differences:
• Legal status• Organisational forms• Size, structure• History
Commonalities:
• Mission (social, not profit maximising)
• Continuity (permanent character)
• Long term strategic plan• Stated values• Defined target groups• Legally ‘approved’ or self-
defined social (housing) mission.
The social enterprise model?
7Titel van de presentatie
Adaptative strategies to different institutional contexts and logics
Organisational archetypes in the social housing sector (Gruis 2008)
8Titel van de presentatie
How are housing organisations in different settings responding to current contextual developments?
Two cases:
• The Netherlands
• England
9Titel van de presentatie
The Netherlands
• Housing associations under increasing financial pressure from governmental taxes, reduced income from sales and tighter conditions for finance.
• EU / Dutch government ruling:
• Split between ‘social’ activities which may be funded with state aid and ‘commercial’ activities which may be not.
Impact on financial architecture (and on funding levels?)
• Narrower target groups: income ceilings Impact on tenants’ profiles, sustainable communities, affordability?
10Titel van de presentatie
Responses by Dutch housing associations: 1. Narrowing scope of activities
Average balance of pairs and possible priorities in 2007 & 2010 (Gruis 2008)
11Titel van de presentatie
Responses by Dutch housing associations: 2. Reducing demolition & development activities, increasing refurbishment of existing stock
Source: Central Housing Fund (2011)
12Titel van de presentatie
Responses by Dutch housing associations: 3. From a transition to ‘social innovators’ to ‘social housing investors’
Source: Central Housing Fund (2011)
13Titel van de presentatie
Responses by Dutch Housing associations: 4. However - keep active role in society
• Aim to maintain a wide network and cooperation with societal partner organisations to stay active in broader societal interests.
• Regional specificities play pivotal role on housing association’s continuous role as social enterprises in the communities where they operate.
14Titel van de presentatie
England
• Major changes to social housing policy and regulation coupled to wide-ranging welfare reform creating a new environment for housing associations:
• Reduction in capital grants
• Possibility for social landlords to charge higher social rents to new tenants (up to 80% market rents)
• Housing benefit significantly cut
• Localism bill, ‘big society’ discourse: emphasis on the role of third sector actors in service delivery
• Government pledges 150,000 new social units in four-year term.
Challenges and opportunities
15Titel van de presentatie
Responses from English housing associations:
• Less capital funding => more debt => higher risk
• Financial strength and business strategy of each company determining new development levels
• Most going for considerable lower development levels (caution)
• Concerns about affordability (insider – outsider dilemma)
16Titel van de presentatie
Responses from English housing associations:Shifting position between the State, Market and Society?
17Titel van de presentatie
Conclusion
• Social enterprises in housing significantly influenced by current financial and regulatory constraints.
• However, in line with their social mission and their hybrid nature, still aiming to counterbalance these pressures with staying active in wider societal interests as much as possible.
• Factors determining different responses (State, market or community orientations) include: financial strength, regional context (housing markets), leadership, consistency of core mission…