Transcript of Physics Summary & Homework Amarjit Soni HET, BNL (soni@bnl.gov) Super-B’05@Hawaii.
- Slide 1
- Physics Summary & Homework Amarjit Soni HET, BNL
(soni@bnl.gov) Super-B05@Hawaii
- Slide 2
- Topics I. Possible sightings of New Physics 1) b->s penguin
dominated modes 2) B-> A K II. Potential use of semi-inclusive
hadronic modes for NP search III. Radiative Decays: Br`s, DIRCP,
MIXCP IV. Direct extraction of UT Olsen, Mishima,Smith, Hou,
Mishima X-G He Hulsbergen,Mitov,Nishida Atwood,Gritsan
Datta,Zupan
- Slide 3
- Other topics G. Eigen: Y.Okada T. Iijima N.Satoh H. Paes
(Apologies if I missed yours) Extremely instructive ~25 talks! I
learned a lot!
- Slide 4
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Lumi. Benchmarx [0.2, 2, 10]/ab
Impt. Things LHCb May not b able 2 do Exptal inputs That may help
Theory (models)
- Slide 5
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Possible sightings of exotic
b->s Penguins Current state of theory Current state of expt.
Summary: For K S [,], S>0.10 is very difficult to accommodate in
the SM Summary:For K S there is about 2 to 2.7 deviation, So it is
rather marginal. Does this mean we should forget about it?
emphatically, no. In fact, experimentalists (or group) may easily
get burnt by ignoring it! We can and must try to get to the bottom
of this as quickly as possible
- Slide 6
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Iijima
- Slide 9
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Glmpses from a few theoretical
studies I. London &A.S.PLB97use nave quark model to suggest S=0
+ O(few%) for B->K S [,,,,,];but, in view of hadronic
uncertainties advocate S>0.1 may be problematic for the
CKM-paradigm.Note, paper was basically motivated by the huge Br of
K S discovered @ CLEO II 1) Mishima & Li (pQCD) K S [,] very
clean..[How about ??] 2)Beneke&Neubert(hep-ph/0308039) use QCDF
in their study main conclusion: K S [,] are the cleanest modes with
smallest S & smallest uncertainties 3)Cheng,Chua,A.S.
[QCDF+FSI], K S is cleanest; K S is also very clean.
- Slide 10
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- HWT: Ks in pQCD?
- Slide 15
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii J.Smith@SBF05 Will answer this
Later in own way C later
- Slide 16
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii J.Smith@ CKM05
- Slide 17
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii
- Slide 18
- Although, at the moment it is at best a marginal effect, it may
well become a serious blunder on the part of experimentalists to
ignore it! We can try learn some lessons from history. It is
extremely important to understand that basically it is a very good
test of the SM and theoretically it can be further improved
- Slide 19
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii
Christenson,Hicks,Lederman,Limon,Pope & Zavattini PRD 8,2016
72
- Slide 20
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii .20+-0.02 BOTTOMLINE It is
IMPOSSIBLE that genuine NP will show up only">
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii What if improved measurements
(e.g.) show S K >.20+-0.02 BOTTOMLINE It is IMPOSSIBLE that
genuine NP will show up only in K S, many other hadronic (b ->s)
final states MUST show NP effects. Furthermore, radiative and
(pair)leptonic will in all likelihood be affected as well
- Slide 25
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii K Puzzle? Talks @SB05 by George
Hou (New Physics?) and Satoshi Mishima (pQCD?) Will also draw from
talks at CKM05 (Andre Buras, Robert Fleischer, Harry Lipkin) and
literature(See, e.g. Baek et al hep-ph/0412086.)
- Slide 26
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Exptal. Status Of Kpi modes
- Slide 27
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Satoshi Mishima@ SBF05
- Slide 28
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Buras@ CKM05
- Slide 29
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Exptal. Status Of Kpi modes KEY
Large dir CP in +- surprise to many->FSI in Bs may be very
important
- Slide 30
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii
- Slide 31
- Possibility of large direct CP in K
- Slide 32
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Mishima@SBF05
- Slide 33
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Interesting if survives further
scrutiny & Expt. Checks
- Slide 34
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii George Hou @ SBF05
- Slide 35
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii from unitarity safe measured
Phase Set George Hou@SBF05
- Slide 36
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii George Hou@SBF0
- Slide 37
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii
- Slide 38
- Are the EWP too fat? EWP are, for sure, an excellent place to
Look for NPbut before one can say Whether they are fat (contain NP)
or not We have to 1 st unambiguously see EWP In (hadronic)
modes
- Slide 39
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Are the EWP too fat? HW 4
HFAG:PLEASE USE ISOSPIN SUM RULE to test 4 EWP
- Slide 40
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Are the EWP too fat? Expt.
Prospects Now 2/ab 10/ab -.02(.07).03.02
- Slide 41
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Cheng,Chua,A.S.,hep-ph/0409317
DIRECT CP in - 0 is a very important NULL Test of the SM
- Slide 42
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii HW4E
- Slide 43
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Expt.Vs.theory on CPAsy in K Expt
Theory Mode Now 2/ab 10/ab pQCD SD FSI -0 -.02(.03) (.02) (.01)
-.01.01.024 0-.04(.04) (.02) (.01) -.14.08 -.11 00 -.09(.14) (.07)
(.04) -.01 -.04.03
- Slide 44
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii X-G.He@SBF05
- Slide 45
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii X-G.He@SBF05
- Slide 46
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii X-G.He@SBF05
- Slide 47
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Nishida@SBF05
- Slide 48
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Nishida@SBF05 Exc. Method for Vtd
requires precise form Factor & only B 0 must be used
- Slide 49
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Nishida@SBF05
- Slide 50
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Nishida@SBF05
- Slide 51
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii
- Slide 52
- Mitov@SBF05
- Slide 53
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Mitov@SBF05
- Slide 54
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii
- Slide 55
- Slide 56
- Slide 57
- Expect Br(K)>K( NR )
- Slide 58
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii MacFarlane@SBF05
- Slide 59
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii
- Slide 60
- Dealing with Theoretical subtelties QCD corrections introduce
complications (though dont expect 0.1).Asy(S) becomes function of
inv. mass,angle,final State, whereas all 3 collapse into a single
Constant for LO analysis; schematically: dS i /dMdZ = A 0 + B i +C
i M+ D i Z Where I=[K *, K,2 *,K 3 *.;K (,)] That is now HW for the
exptalists do MC Important point is that INTERPERTATION IS DATA
DRIVEN HW for theorists These are radiative NOT hadronic final
states. Therefore calculations significantly less difficult than
exclusive Hadonic FS Should be amenable to pQCD, QCDF, SCET.
- Slide 61
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Direct determination of UT
- Slide 62
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Owen Long@SBF05
- Slide 63
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii
- Slide 64
- Slide 65
- Irreducible Theory & Expt. Errors ITE IEE (sin2 1 ) ~.1%
(Mannel).015 (Long) ~ few% (HW4T) ? (HW4E) 3 () ~.1% (HW4T)
?(HW4E)
- Slide 66
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii
- Slide 67
- Gritsan@SBF05
- Slide 68
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Gritsan@SBF05
- Slide 69
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Gritsan@SBF05
- Slide 70
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii
- Slide 71
- Atwood@SBF05 HW4E
- Slide 72
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Atwood@SBF05
- Slide 73
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Iijima
- Slide 74
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii In extraction of 3 () D 0* must
be included IMPORTANT HW For experimental colleagues, please read
section in hep-ph/0312100 esp. fig.2 & p.10 If not you are
making outdated, Inefficient use of data
- Slide 75
- SUMMARY of SUMMARY (ONLY SOME HW LISTED HERE)
- Slide 76
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii I.Projections for direct
determination of UT Now(.2/ab) 2/ab 10/ab ITE Sin2
1.037.015.015(?).001 13 4(?) 2(?) ~1(?) ( 3 ) 20,10,10 5 2 SUPER-B
is essential for this goal
- Slide 77
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii WHY FOLLOW THIS HOLY GRAIL? ITE
provides great opportunity to nail down fundamental parameters of
SM-CKM to an unprecedented precision. Most likely we will need all
the precision we can muster to search for new phase(s). BSM
phase(s) essentially guranteed, but in light of BF results, even if
NP is O(1), its effect on B-physics need not (and is unlikely to)
be large. Remember m .had to go down 3-4 orders of magnitude
Remember also K ~10 -3! Even though CKM-phase is O(1)! So precision
is essential..Need lots and lots of CLEAN Bs. SUPER-B is essential
and LHCb unlikely to be able to do a lot that is needed.
- Slide 78
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Some (more) HW for this section
1)For ( 3 ) extraction inclusion of D 0* is essentially
mandatoryImplementation of separate methods (GLW, ADS,or DALITZ) is
OUTDATED and INEFFICENT use of data and (wo)man power 2) Need to
study SM predictions for TCA in VV channelsMUST include EWP,
annihilation, realistic quark masses. Use of nave factorization
here is useless. Should use pQCD, QCDF+FSI. W/o this important
input estimates of EXOTICA may be misleading and likely to come to
haunt us. 3) OF course VV channels are extremely informative and
powerful, a SBF is essential to exploit the wealth contained
therein
- Slide 79
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii II. IMPORTANT PHYSICS ITEMSTHAT
LHCb MAY NOT BE ABLE TO DO
- Slide 80
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Iijima@SBF05
- Slide 81
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii III.Radiative B-decays
EXCEEDINGLY POWERFUL 1)Very important THEO. Progress NNLO
Additional impetus for improved measurements 2)DIR CP B->Xs
gamma needs it for sure Now (~.1/ab) 2/ab 10/ab |Acp| Xd gamma very
clean way to get Vtd Again SBF essential (LHCb cant) Note ~15% dir
CP predicted..v. sensitive to NP 4) Mix-In-CP another very
sensitive probe SBF needed LHCb cannot do this physics either
- Slide 82
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii Important HW4E
- Slide 83
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii
- Slide 84
- Slide 85
- V.Summary on Penguin Modes 1. Very useful ANTs. S>0.10 (for
many modes) -> NP K S is especially clean; to some degree also K
S [HWT cal. S for K S esp. PQCD] [Note also, theory difficulty in
cal. Br does NOT mean CP asy is also problematic. Recall Br(B->K
S ) problematic for a long long time yet sin(2 1 / ) determination
precise] 2. Current deviation ~2.7 NOT significant but demands
resolution may be big folly to dismiss it. REMEMBER LEONS SHOULDER
! 3. Nothing wrong with the testinfact theory Can & will
improve. 4. LHCb unlikely to be able to do most of this
physics!
- Slide 86
- Physics Summary SBF'05 Hawaii