Post on 03-Apr-2018
7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
1/24
http://eep.sagepub.com
SocietiesEast European Politics &
DOI: 10.1177/08883254073073512007; 21; 588East European Politics and Societies
Jennifer R. Cashin the Republic of Moldova
Origins, Memory, and Identity: "Villages" and the Politics of Nationalism
http://eep.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/21/4/588The online version of this article can be found at:
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:American Council of Learned Societies
can be found at:East European Politics & SocietiesAdditional services and information for
http://eep.sagepub.com/cgi/alertsEmail Alerts:
http://eep.sagepub.com/subscriptionsSubscriptions:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navReprints:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navPermissions:
http://eep.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/21/4/588SAGE Journals Online and HighWire Press platforms):
(this article cites 6 articles hosted on theCitations
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://www.acls.org/http://www.acls.org/http://eep.sagepub.com/cgi/alertshttp://eep.sagepub.com/cgi/alertshttp://eep.sagepub.com/subscriptionshttp://eep.sagepub.com/subscriptionshttp://eep.sagepub.com/subscriptionshttp://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navhttp://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navhttp://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navhttp://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navhttp://eep.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/21/4/588http://eep.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/21/4/588http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/21/4/588http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navhttp://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navhttp://eep.sagepub.com/subscriptionshttp://eep.sagepub.com/cgi/alertshttp://www.acls.org/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
2/24
Origins, Memory, and Identity: Villagesand the Politics of Nationalism in the
Republic of MoldovaJennifer R. Cash*
This article reconsiders the manifestation of nationalism in the Republic ofMoldova during the late Soviet period and early 1990s. Whereas dominantapproaches have focused on the ethnic dimensions of the national move-ment, I argue that rural-urban identities also played a significant role in shap-ing political events and outcomes of the recent past by drawing onethnographic research among participants in the folkloric movement
within the arts and performance world. This movement coincided with thebroader national movement of the 1980s and demonstrates the centrality ofvillages in the construction of an anti-Soviet national identity among eth-nic Moldovans. In conclusion, the politics of nationalism must be understoodin a wider framework that also accounts for the importance of non-ethnicforms of collective identity, such as villages, and that investigates how indi-
vidual origins and social memory shape civic and political participation.
Keywords: Moldova; national identity; rural-urban identities; memory
National identity has been the single most studied aspect of poli-
tics in the Republic of Moldova since the country gained inde-
pendence in 1991. Most analysts and scholars have been
compelled to structure their accounts of recent political life by
asking the questionwhy did Moldova fail to unite with Romania
when it seceded from the Soviet Union? Asking this question
yields an account of a break in Moldovas political trajectorybetween 1991 and 1994, as local political forces shifted away from
overtly nationalistic platforms. While surprising, this shift has
East European Politics and Societies, Vol. 21, No. 4, pages 588610. ISSN 0888-3254 2007 by the American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1177/0888325407307351
*This article benefited greatly from comments made by participants at a workshop on
Emerging Citizenship and Contested Identities between the Dneister, Prut, and Danube
Rivers held at the Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology in Halle, Germany, on 10-11
March 2005. An earlier version of this article, focusing on the state as a citizenship regime, was
also published in the proceeds from that conference as Amintiri despre trecutul statelor: iden-
titatea accentuata si provocarile cetateniei (Memories of States Past: Identity Salience and the
Challenges of Citizenship) in Stat slab, cetatenie ncerta, ed. Monica Heintz (Bucharest:
Curtea Veche, 2007), 105-26. Field research conducted in 2001 was supported by an IndividualAdvanced Research Opportunity (IARO) grant from IREX. Neither IREX nor my fellow work-
shop participants bear responsibility for the information or views expressed here, and any
errors are my own.
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
3/24
generally received positive evaluations because it seems to indi-
cate political moderation and maturity. The drop in support for
pro-Romanianism, which occurred as tensions developed in the
southern and eastern portions of the country, suggests thatMoldovas citizens will not support exclusionary forms of ethnic-
derived politics, andby extensionthat the governments legit-
imacy now depends on the degree to which it can address issues
beyond the sphere of identity politics. The dominant focus on
national identity in the recent literature on Moldova has therefore
been helpful for understanding social and political processes in
two ways: first, it has demonstrated that Romanian-Moldovan
relations are more complex than rhetorics of shared identitywould suggest, depending on a host of other local issues in each
country; and, second, it has traced how Moldovas political elite
have thus far responded to an electorate that is reluctant to pur-
sue identity politics to the point of conflict.
In the following article, however, I argue that despite the self-
correctives it has provided, the nearly exclusive focus on national
identity in Moldova has also resulted in a misunderstanding of fun-
damental dimensions of local political life and state-citizen relations.In contrast, by focusing on village, rural, and regional identities, I argue
that ethno-national identity is not the only social identity impli-
cated in political activity. Moreover, it may be premature to equate
the responsiveness of political parties to citizen moods with the
states legitimacy, as Moldovas citizens may not actually be prepared
to recognize the legitimacy of any state, regardless of the issues pur-
sued by its government. My argument hinges on the centrality of
collective memory to social life and political activity. Specifically, Iargue that a common feature of political life in Moldova since at
least the 1980s has been a principled mistrust of the state as a
political institution and actor. My data stem from ethnographic
work among members of the folkloric movement during 2001. I
see the emphases on village, rural, and regional identities in folk-
loric activities and among professional folklorists as emblematic
of broader patterns of social identity and memory throughout
Moldova. In conclusion, I urge other scholars and policy makers tomore fully pursue the political implications of these and other non-
national and non-ethnic forms of identity in Moldova.
East European Politics and Societies 589
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
4/24
Republic of Moldova: Unraveling the paradox
In 1991, Moldovas declaration of independence from the Soviet
Union was considered normal, following as it did in the wake of
so many other republics similar declarations. But in the years that
followed, the rhetoric of pro-Romanianism gradually faded from
the speeches of political leaders, who moreover failed to initiate
unification with neighboring Romania. By 1994, Moldovas govern-
ment seemed to have embarked on the path of creating a decidedly
civic and multi-ethnic state,1 producing both confusion and opti-
mism among foreign scholars and policy makers.2
For observers, Moldovas political path since 1991 initially
seems counterintuitive because unification with Romania seemed
so certain.3After all, a majority (65 percent) of Moldovas popula-
tion can be considered ethnically Romanian (their native language
is linguistically indistinguishable from literary standard Romanian).4
Soviet secession was also preceded by a clearly pro-Romanian
nationalist movement, which refuted the existence of a Moldovan
nation distinct from that of the Romanians.5 Scholarship produced
prior to independence also played a role in reinforcing the expec-
tation that unification would follow independence, as dominant
historiographical approaches to Moldovas history concentrated
on documenting the illegitimacy of the Soviet Unions acquisition
of Bessarabia from Romania and the denationalizing effects of
Soviet policies on the local population.6
Efforts of the past decade, however, have succeeded in unrav-
eling much of the apparent paradox of Moldovas continued
sovereignty and renewed Moldovanism since the mid-1990s.
Pro-unification rhetoric generated significant fear and anxiety
among ethnic minorities, contributing to the development of the
Transnistrian and Gagauz conflicts in the years immediately fol-
lowing independence. These conflicts have constrained political
options during the past decade, as Moldovas political leaders in
Chisinau attempt to retain control over the full territory of the for-
mer Soviet republic. Beyond the dimensions of ethnic anxiety,
regionalism, and elite competition,7 the causes and consequences
of these conflicts also demonstrate several factors that help
explain the political inexpediency of reunification from the local
590 Moldovan Villages and the Politics of Nationalism
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
5/24
perspective. These factors include a tradition of political and
ethnic tolerance, real political differences between the citizenries
of Moldova and Romania, and suspicions on all sides (ethnic
Moldovans, Moldovas minorities, and Romanias citizenry)regarding the likely outcome of unification.8
While the Romanian question has occupied most political analy-
sis in and of Moldova, the Moldovan question or Bessarabian
question has been given significantly less attention in analyses
of Romanian politics since 1989. Romanias lack of initiative for
reunification might be seen as equally paradoxical. In the early
1990s, nearly all of Romanias political parties touted Bessarabias
reunification as a goal, yet none has actually pursued it. The fail-ure of ethno-national identity to guide Romanias foreign policy
also has several explanations. For one, during the years when
pro-Romanianism was in ascendance in Moldova, Romanias for-
eign policy had not fully broken free of socialist era relationships
with the Soviet Union. Indeed, Romanias first president after
Nicolae Ceausescu, Ion Iliescu, clearly maintained Soviet ties and
acted with circumspection in establishing Romanian relations
with a newly independent Moldova.9
Thereafter, Romanias inter-nal political dynamics developed in ways such that Bessarabia
never emerged as a wedge issue that could increase one partys
power over that of the others. Indeed, opinion polls indicate that
Romanians did not prioritize reunification; they were instead
most concerned with domestic issues, particularly those related
to economics.10 Romanian political developments thus present
another paradox: despite the ubiquity of nationalist rhetoric in
political life and widespread nation-centric views about how thestate should be organized, actual political behavior correlates
more strongly with real and perceived economic threats than
with ethnic or national identity.11
Memories of Romanian nation-building
Taken together, the development of Romanian and Moldovan
positions on reunification belies nationalist ideology. Rather thanforging a common state when given the chance, ethnic brothers
on both sides of the Prut have retained separate states. In both
East European Politics and Societies 591
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
6/24
cases, national identity is deeply important to the political process,
yet regional power balances, economic interest, and pragmatism
in ethnic relations have held sway in foreign policy developments.
Politics in Romania and Moldova, however, should not be reducedto purely rational explanations. Among the rational factors
listed above also appear several related to identity.
For example, the suspicion held by ethnic Moldovans and their
minority neighbors toward Romania and Romanians deserves fur-
ther investigation, as it points largely to the influence of collective
memory on political behavior. At the beginning of the inter-war
period, ethnic Moldovans considered Romania an uncivilized
country, denigrated Romanian high culture, and were convincedthat Romanian literature could or should not exist. The negative
appraisal of Romania and Romanians may have been a conse-
quence of unfamiliarity; after all, local intellectuals and the upper
classes had been progressively integrated into Russian institu-
tions, language, and culture from 1812.12 Familiarity, however,
confirmed and developed negative appraisals of Romania and
Romanians during the inter-war period.
The Romanian project for nation-building in Bessarabia was acomplex one, combining nation-building with state-building, mod-
ernization, and urbanization. At the level of nation-building alone,
Romanian administrators were faced with the task of convincing
ethnic Moldovans that they were, in fact, ethnic Romanians. The
other projects required increasing literacy (in Romanian), building
infrastructure, developing industry, and staffing the new institu-
tions with Romanian speakers. These were not easy tasks, all the
more because ethnic Moldovans held Russian language and cul-ture in high esteem, but considered their own language inappro-
priate for public discourse. While inter-war efforts enjoyed some
success, Romanian rule also left a record of corrupt, incompetent,
greedy, and foolishly proud administrators.
The shortcomings of Romanian rule were recognized by con-
temporary commentators13 and have been kept alive in collective
memory. One woman, for example, who was in her early teens
during World War II, responded to my question about the possi-bilities of Romanian-Moldovan re-unification with an answer
rooted in her childhood experience.
592 Moldovan Villages and the Politics of Nationalism
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
7/24
Romania wants reunification because Romanians know that Moldovansare hard-working, but Romanians are stinkers. Romania is full ofGypsies, and they steal. Romanians know that they lived here well, and
when they left, they left with full suitcases. But no Moldovans would
ever want to re-unite with Romania. We know what Romanians are like.The country needs to be left to live by itself for a while, and it wants tolive by itself. Only the rich in Moldova want to reunite because thenthey could control people; people would work for them, and they
would take, and go to Bucharest, and live very well. You should go tothe countryside and ask people if they want to reunite. See if they donot tell you exactly what I have told you.
Indeed, during 2001 and since, I have encountered many asser-
tions that Romanians are Gypsies and Romanians are thieves.For at least some individuals, these stereotypes reflect directly on
Romanian behavior during the inter-war period. While many indi-
viduals spoke from their experience of the Romanian impact in vil-
lages, others had grown up in towns or cities, and they came from
different ethnic backgrounds.14 Another man followed his invec-
tives against the Romanians by explaining to me that he had pre-
ferred Soviet rule because agriculture was organized, there had
been money to buy his daughters pretty dresses, and things hadbeen nice. Memories of inter-war rule surface in other forms as
well, such as a good-natured argument I encountered among
elderly villagers in the village of T ra over which army (Romanians,
Russians, or Germans) had treated them best. The loudest voice
came out in favor of the Germans, who were claimed to have
treated women with deference, given children candy, and paid for
the milk they consumed, in implied contrast to known tales of
Romanians and Russians having confiscated both villagers foodsupplies and livestock as their own.15Although Romanian projects
also affected rural-urban and inter-ethnic relations, these changes
are not the most salient ones in contemporary public discussion,
which instead focuses on collective memories of the presence and
negative effects of Romanian rule in rural areas.
Memories of nationalizing states
Memories of Romanian rule are not the only collective memo-
ries that have influenced political behavior in Moldova during the
East European Politics and Societies 593
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
8/24
past two decades. Rather, memories of previous state rule, previ-
ous nation-building projects and policies, and traditional life, as
practiced and experienced in villages, contributed greatly to the
swell of popular protest against state rule, andsubsequentlytothe subsiding interest in creating a strongly mono-ethnic nation-
state, whether by unification or pro-Romanian policies. In short,
Moldovas past has created a citizenry that is skeptical of states in
general, and of nationalizing states in particular.
In the following pages, I suggest how more thorough investiga-
tions of memory can inform understandings of political behavior
in Moldova, and more broadly throughout Eastern Europe where
populations have experienced the failure of previous states andtheir nation-building activities. I use examples taken from the life
and career histories of individuals involved in the folkloric move-
ment that accompanied Moldovas nationalist movement in the
late 1980s and early 1990s to demonstrate how some key local
identities were inadvertently strengthened by state policies during
the Soviet period. In particular, individuals born in villages faced
discrimination in urban housing and employment opportunities,
even as the Soviet state drew them to cities through other policiesthat encouraged urbanization, industrialization, and moderniza-
tion. Structures of higher education and cultural activity were as
deeply implemented in Soviet urbanization as were factories, and
perhaps even more so, as the best schools and subsequent
career opportunities within each republic were concentrated in
the capital city. As Moldovas cities swelled with rural immigrants
in the 1980s, their experiences with structural discrimination
helped re-constitute the village as a collectively imagined sourceof deeply valued authentic social and cultural identity. The folk-
loric movement, as it formed in the 1980s, captured and reflected
the importance of the village in individual lives from a variety of
directions, which I explore below.
The folkloric movement
During the 1980s and 1990s, Moldova experienced a folkloricmovement at the same time as the national movement gained
prominence. As a movement among professional folklorists,
594 Moldovan Villages and the Politics of Nationalism
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
9/24
ethnographers, and performers, the folkloric movement protested
Soviet visions of national identity and culture.16 The folkloric move-
ment also had more narrowly defined goals than did the broader
social and political national movement with which it coincided.Most concisely, the folkloric movement was concerned with the
representation of Moldovan folklore as it appeared in the per-
formances ofpopular(Russ. narodnii) ensembles. Members of
the movement sought to replace the choreographed repertoires,
stylized performances, and politicized narratives of folklore
presented bypopularensembles with authentic folklore as it
existed in Moldovas actual villages. To this end, they organized
new ensembles, workshops, and festivals that adhered to rigor-ous criteria: authentic folkloric performances were to incorpo-
rate materials that the performers had collected directly from a
limited number of villages (ideally, only one village). In costum-
ing, staging, delivery, and composition of performers by number,
age, and gender, the new folklore was expected to replicate vil-
lage reality as closely as possible. By refocusing on the village as
the source of traditions, the folkloric movement also sought to
eliminate the recurrent discussion of inter-ethnic friendshipdepicted in manypopularperformances. Today, the prominence
of ethnicity in Soviet performances is still interpreted by
members of the movement as reflecting a distasteful and manip-
ulative political ideology. Ensembles representing any ethnic
group (via village-based repertoires) are technically eligible to
compete under the new standards of authenticity, but move-
ment members remain quietly divided over the question of
which ethnic groups actually possess distinct and authentic tra-ditions.17 Across ethnic lines and generally ignoring the ethnic
dimensions of their goals, movement members today describe
their activity of the past two decades as removing culture from
politics and re-establishing a natural order to social life.
While the movement has not succeeded in eliminatingpopu-
lar ensembles, or in erasing their popularity with the general
public, it has been successful in establishing new definitions and
criteria for folklore as a performative genre. During the pasttwo decades, countless ensembles and over twenty competitive
festivals have been established for the exclusive performance
East European Politics and Societies 595
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
10/24
and development of self-consciously authentic folcloric and etno-
folcloric ensembles. During my fieldwork among these ensembles
in 2001, attendance at festivals was generally low and limited to
members and supporters of the performing groups themselves. Yetat the height of local opposition to Soviet practices in the late 1980s
and early 1990s, public performances by these new ensembles
drew tears from their audiences. When I asked why these perfor-
mances had elicited such strong emotional responses, I was given
a simple answer: people in the audiences came from villages and
knew the traditional songs, dances, costumes, and rituals.
More than the nationalist movement, which it accompanied,
the folkloric movement reflects the complex relation betweenethnic and non-ethnic identities in the Republic of Moldova. In
so doing, it also explains why nation-building efforts that focus
explicitly on capturing and cultivating ethnic identities have ulti-
mately appeared false to Moldovas ethnic majority. Ethnic
Moldovan identity is not based on linguistic and cultural traits
alone; rather, Moldovan ethnicity also exists in relational terms.
Specifically, Moldovan ethnicity encapsulates historical patterns
of discrimination, neglect, and inadequate representation bystate structures. The discourse of authentic villages and region-
alism appearing in the new folklore therefore reflects and rein-
forces a general suspicion of state power.
In the following pages, I explore the initial resonance of the
folkloric movements aims with the personal lives of the general
population and performers themselves. What was it about vil-
lages and village life that generated shared emotional reactions
between folklorists, performers, and the general public for a fewyears? The folkloric movement points our attention to the con-
tinued prominence of local, rural, village, and regional identities
in the Republic of Moldova. These identities have previously con-
flicted with the demands, issued first by Romania and then by the
Soviet Union, that ethnic Moldovans prioritize citizenship and
nationalityover other identities in their personal and political
lives. Actual encounters with the state through its policies and
institutions, however, have reinforced the social importance oflocal space as individuals from rural areas have been kept in
their place vis--vis the modernizing state.
596 Moldovan Villages and the Politics of Nationalism
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
11/24
Career chocies and village origins
Members of Moldovas folkloric community share their commit-
ment to village-based research with other ethnographers and folk-
lorists throughout Eastern Europe. Indeed, the focus on the
village is a point of both convergence and divergence between
East European ethnology and Western anthropology.18 Thus vil-
lages appear as the source of authentic tradition in Moldovas folk-
loric ensembles in part because scholarship requires it. Yet the
individuals involved in organizing authentic folkloric activities
began to do so in opposition to a specifically Soviet model of folk-
loric performance, and therefore it is important to ask why
members of the folkloric movement chose to reform their profes-
sion by advocating highly detailed and accurate study and repre-
sentation of villages. Whyin 1980s Soviet Moldovadid the
village appear as the most ideal and self-evident locus for cultural
authority and identity?
In order to understand the personal meaning members of the
folkloric community attribute to the village, I asked my infor-
mants how they began their careers in folklore. I found that for
many ensemble directors, their training as musicians or dancers
preceded their involvement in folklore. Few deliberately chose
folklore; it emerged as an area of possible activity that they
accepted. When they talked about the beginnings of their
careers, however, many of my contacts brought up their village
origins as having a decisive impact on their choices. Such is the
case with theSurorile O. (Sisters O.), who were among the first
and most influential members of the folkloric community.19
In September 2001, I interviewed Elena O., one of the founding
members of the music ensemble Talancuta,20which was the first
etnofolcloric ensemble established in Moldova. All members of
this ensemble are involved in teaching folklore to children or ado-
lescents, and the ensembles founder and director, Andrei T., is
known for both his work on ethnopedagogy and his leadership of
the folkloric movement. Elena also has four sisters, all of whom are
active in Talancuta. The five sisters also sing together as the Sisters O.
and are among the most well-known and publicly recognized
members of the folkloric movement. On September 22, Elena and
East European Politics and Societies 597
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
12/24
598 Moldovan Villages and the Politics of Nationalism
her sister Maria visited an ethnographer friend of theirs at home. I
was also, coincidentally, visiting their friend, who, upon learning
that I had been trying unsuccessfully to interview the sisters for
quite some time, determined that we would lead the two sistersinto a discussion of their personal histories: how they got involved
in folklore, how and why they started their childrens ensembles,
and how their work has changed over the years.
The story that emerged indicates the range of limitations
experienced by young adults from Moldovas villages as they
tried to establish themselves in the capital city during the early
1980s. Elena came to the State Institute for the Arts (now the
Academy of Music, Theater, and Plastic Arts) in 1980. Her futurehusband introduced her to his brother, Andrei T., who then
involved her in singing folklore. Some of Elenas younger sisters
came to Chisinau in the following few years to study, but the
others cameat least in partto join Elena in singing folklore.
T. had identified several pieces he wanted to stage for which
Elenas voice was not suited; her sisters, however, could sing
these pieces, and were encouraged to join T.s nascent ensemble,
and at the same time formed a subgroup with their sister.Although Talancuta is now a state-funded ensemble, it was orig-
inally composed of music students as an extracurricular club.
Elena and her sisters experienced multiple problems related
to housing in Chisinau. Elena initially came as a student and lived
in a dormitory, but after graduating in 1984, shelike her other
sistershad to get a residency permit to remain in the city.
Surorile O. had become a well-known ensemble by that time, so
Elena sought help from the Ministry of Culture.
E: There was a respected woman at the Ministry of Culture.
I went to see her in 1984 when I had just finished the Art
Institute and I said, give us [a room] in the dormitory
where we liveits still a dormitory for the Art Institute
todaygive Surorile O. a space there because we want
to continue working with folklore. And she replied, you
can keep doing what you are doing, but lookthere are[people] coming from Russia. Lots of musicians, balleri-
nas, are coming and we have to house them, and give
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
13/24
them apartments. You are from Moldova. You can fall
back where you came [from].
Elenas proposal was turned down by the ministry official on thegrounds that the ministry had to secure housing for visiting
artists. Since Elena and her sisters were born in Moldova, the offi-
cial said the ministry was not, or could not be, responsible for
them. This memory immediately evoked strong comments from
the other two women about the betrayal of local culture by the
same institution thatthey thoughtshould have protected
them most as individuals who were trying to preserve and
develop that same culture. Instead of being employed andhoused in the capital, however, local artists and performers were
sent home to their native villages.
As Elenas account illustrates, many individuals were deeply
affected by the frustrations of not being able to secure housing,
remain in the capital, begin a career related to their education,
and provide for themselves. Folklorists, performers, and ethnog-
raphers were not alone in their difficulties. In the 1980s, legisla-
tion and bureaucratic procedures hindered many individualsfrom securing housing and jobs through official channels, result-
ing in structural discrimination against those individuals who
tried to move out of the placebe it apartment, village, or
republicthat the state had already allocated to them.21 Indeed,
although technically permitted, one could rarely buy a house in
Chisinau without having a residency permit for the city. Yet one
could not obtain a residency permit without having a house,
meaning that it became impossible for people born outside thecity to relocate permanently through legal channels. To get
around these barriers, people relied on friends, and ethnic,
regional, and subregional networks developed as critical factors
in personal advancement throughout the Republic of Moldova. 22
Newcomers to the capital relied heavily on co-villagers or indi-
viduals from nearby villages to help them secure housing, jobs,
and other necessary goods and services in the city, thereby
heightening the social importance of their village origins.Previous authors emphasize the effects that nationality had on
an individuals career options in the Soviet Union.23 Non-Russians,
East European Politics and Societies 599
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
14/24
for example, were more likely to be trained in the humanities
than the sciences to produce national cultural cadres in each
republic.24 In the realm of performing arts, such as dance, train-
ing was available at both the all-Soviet and republican levels, butthe opportunities were greater for individuals trained in Moscow
and Leningrad, whose professional placement was not limited to
the republic in which they received training but could span the
entire union.25 Ethnicity certainly affected the career choices of
my informants, the majority of whom are ethnic Moldovans. Less
attention, however, has been given to the effects of rural origins
on career choices. Because rural and ethnic origins still overlap
to a significant degree in Moldova, Soviet-era structural discrimi-nation against non-Russians often doubly discriminated against
villagers. In some instances, like housing allocation in the 1980s,
discrimination occurred explicitly in terms of origins: from
Moldova, or not from Moldova. Although the law guaranteed
housing, patterns in its interpretation meant that many people,
after having been educated in the cities, were legally obliged to
return to the villages where they had been born. If they chose to
remain in the cities, they continued to encounter bureaucraticobstacles, and the daily business of normal living forced them to
learn how to habitually circumvent the law. Rather than providing
for its citizens, the state became a source of deprivation and lies,
andultimatelya farce.
Urbanization during the Soviet period
The life trajectories of the individuals described above, likethose of many of the other members of the folkloric community
with whom I worked, are shaped by the wider trends of urbaniza-
tion throughout Moldova after World War II. In this respect, their
experiences as young adults who were born in villages, educated
in the capital or a handful of other cities, and then confronted with
shortages of urban housing and employment opportunities are
shared by a relatively large percentage of the population.
Urbanization generally increased after the founding of theMoldovan Soviet Socialist Republic (MSSR) in 1940. As reported by
Irina Livezeanu, Bessarabias urban areas constituted only 13 percent
600 Moldovan Villages and the Politics of Nationalism
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
15/24
East European Politics and Societies 601
of the total population in 1930.26 By 1959, 22.3 percent of the
MSSRs population was urban. Between 1959 and 1970, the MSSRs
urban areas grew by 76 percent to account for 31.7 percent of the
republics total population. This trend continued into the 1980s,albeit at a slower rate, with rural migrants to cities accounting for
much of the urban growth. Since much of the rural population is
ethnically Moldovan (i.e., Romanian speakers), rural-urban migra-
tion after World War II also had the net effect of changing the ethnic
composition of Moldovas cities. For example, in 1959 Chisinaus
ethnic composition was 32.3 percent Moldovan, 32.2 percent
Russian, 19.9 percent Jewish, 12 percent Ukrainian, and 0.7 per-
cent Gagauz. By 1970 the proportions had changed to 37.2 per-cent Moldovan, 30.7 percent Russian, 14 percent Jewish, 14.2
percent Ukrainian, and 0.7 percent Gagauz.27
While these proportional changes may seem small, they indi-
cate the potential for drastic social change in Moldova. Specifi-
cally, the increased presence of ethnic Moldovans in Chisinau
challenged the capitals identity as a Russian and Jewish city. This
identity developed after Bessarabias incorporation into the
Russian Empire in 1812, as Russian rule in Bessarabia becameincreasingly centralized and the elites gradually Russified through
a variety of linguistic, educational, religious, and administrative
policies.28 Although the Romanian government sought to
re-Romanianize Chisinau with the rest of Bessarabia during the
interwar period, Russian language and culture still dominated
the capital city at the beginning of Soviet rule. In contrast, Soviet
sociologists reported that ethnic Moldovans moving into urban
areas in the 1960s maintained their rural cultural traditions(including music and weddings), even when they linguistically
assimilated to Russian.29 By the 1980s, when my informants came
from their native villages to seek education and work in the cap-
ital city, they could interpret their own difficulties as originating
in the broader processes of urbanization or Moldovanization
then occurring in the republic. From my ongoing discussions
with members of the folkloric community, individual experiences
of urbanization are equally important as those of ethnic discrim-ination in understanding professional trajectories.
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
16/24
Firsthand experience of rural-to-urban migration also helps
explain the particular appeal of the village to folklorists, per-
formers, and audiences alike in the late 1980s and early 1990s. By
performing the traditions of particular villages, authentic folkloricensembles reached into their audiences memories, activating a
wide and rich body of knowledge about life in the republic, the
organization of social and cultural differences, familial relations
across space, and changing times. The new folk ensembles gave
voice to the new urban populations disorientations, frustrations,
and disappointments by invoking the order, stability, joys, and
comforts of the known and remembered world of villages.
Social Memory and Identity
As specific places and spatially defined social groups, villages
in Moldova constitute what Halbwachs refers to as a framework
of social memory.30 As with other frameworks of memory, vil-
lages help create an experience of social unity and temporal
continuity. Since the majority of Moldovas population has close
family ties to villages, people can weave their individual histories,memories, and experiences into a common narrative of identity.
They use the trope of the village as if this place corresponds to
any and all of Moldovas physically existing villages. Their intimate
experiences in and of actual villages lend a sense of physical real-
ity to their shared and idealized image of the village. Moreover,
the spatial and physical dimensions of real villages help anchor
and organize memory so that it can be retrieved and relived.31
The spatialization of memory in villages provides social andmoral maps that enable newly urban individuals to make life
decisions and construct social relations that lend a sense of con-
tinuity to their changed lives.32
In Moldova, the village serves as both a symbolic and physi-
cal repository of the past that crosses occupational divides.
When folklorists go back to villages (especially their native vil-
lages) for the purposes of research and collection, they external-
ize the act of remembering that otherwise occurs at theindividual and collective levels through discourse. When ordi-
nary people in Chisinau talk about the village, they also go
602 Moldovan Villages and the Politics of Nationalism
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
17/24
back to their pasts. As I discovered in 2001, talk about villages is
constant: at weddings, birthdays, and funerals, people readily
discuss variants in how the celebration is conducted in their vil-
lage; and individuals returning from trips to other villages areregularly asked about the layout of the village, natural surround-
ings, houses, food they were served, and so on. More than idle
or polite conversation, this level of discussion translates into a
wide body of experiential knowledge that people value, display,
and use. Many people know their colleagues home villages and
use this knowledge to interpret an individuals behaviors and
reactions. Villages are known for their social characters as well,
so that people from southern villages, for example, are uniformlyassumed to have hot tempers. Thus, a colleague who is difficult
to work with can be understood, excused, and accommodated if
he or she hails from a southern village. Other villages are con-
sidered to produce individuals who are more or less honest,
proud, calm, or hardworking.
National movement or revolution of villages?
Newly institutionalized folkloric ensembles, festivals, and com-
petitions, however, also function as a vehicle for collective mem-
ory. The ongoing cycle of festivals, broadcast regularly on national
television and radio, reminds audiences of their recent struggle
against Soviet power. Folkloric performances also remind audi-
ences that they asserted a local and indigenous vision of
national identity and culture as part of that struggle. Thus the
folkloric depiction of Moldovan identity through the representa-tion of unique, distinct, and identifiable villages reminds observers
that in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the Moldovan nation
mobilizing for independence was not just ethnically and linguis-
tically defined. In addition to claiming their rights to Romanian
language, culture, and history, Moldovans also reclaimed the
positive value of their rural origins.
Indeed, the active role played by villages in the national move-
ment is part and parcel of collective memory about the nationalmovement itself, as indicated by the following incident. On July 3,
2001, I was traveling with a local ethnographer to a conference in
East European Politics and Societies 603
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
18/24
Iasi, Romania. As we waited at the border for passports to be ver-
ified, another passenger initiated a conversation with my col-
league. In response to questions about our itinerary, my
colleague asked the woman about her home village. Suruceni,the woman replied; my colleague recognized the name, immedi-
ately connecting it to demonstrations in Chisinaus main square
in 1989. She remembered that spectators had been impressed
with the arrival of demonstrators from the village, and had called
out, Look, here comes Suruceni! Having relived this moment
from 1989, the womens conversation then turned to a discus-
sion of the villages history.
As the bus started up again, I asked about the participation ofvillages in the protests of 1989. Did all villages come? When, why,
and how? My colleague could not answer the factual dimensions
of the questions I asked, but she told me why she believed the
appearance of a whole village was significant. It was difficult and
costly, of course, to arrange transportation for so many people.
The police also often prevented busses from reaching the capi-
tal. Thus, the appearance of a village represented a strong com-
mitment from the villagers themselves, but there was alsosomething more to be said about the meaning of a villages
participation. She explained as follows:
When a whole village appears to protest, that is impressive. It is onething when students protest, or children, or women. But when theolder men of the village came out in 1989, dressed in cizme [boots],and each wearing a tall caciula [lambskin hat], you felt as if the talpa
ta
rii [peasantry]
33
was really moving. Men, especially the older ones,are more conservative, less changeable, and harder to bring toprotest. Women are more changeable, and easier to form into agroup to protest something.
In other words, when elderly village men finally appeared in the
capital to protest, my colleague felt as if the whole of society had
united in favor of change.34
Whether or not the presence of village delegations exercised sig-
nificant influence over the development of the protests and politicaldevelopments of 1989-1991 is uncertain and would require further
604 Moldovan Villages and the Politics of Nationalism
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
19/24
research. What is more important than the numerical representa-
tion of village delegations, however, is that people remember the
appearance of particular villages at protests. In this way, collective
memory identifies villages as social actors in the national movement.At one and the same time, memory structures past events into a
coherent narrative and attributes legitimate agency to villages as
social and political actors.35 In general, nations and ethnic groups
everywhere are assumed to have social agency and legitimacy, partly
due to the widespread practice of national historiography.36 In
Moldova, at least, the village also seems to have been attributed
social agency by the general population, as well as by professional
identity specialists who work to communicate the importance of thevillage throughat the very leastfolkloric performance. An accu-
rate analysis of identity politics in Moldova therefore requires atten-
tion to non-ethnic and non-national facets of social identity, such as
those represented by the village.
Nationalism, failed nations, and authentication
The paradoxes of national identity and political behavior inMoldova since 1989 are less surprising when considered from a
longer-term perspective of identity politics in the region.
Specifically, Moldova is a place where the nation-building policies
of modernizing states have failed at least twice. First, Romanian
policies during the inter-war period failed to create a Romanian
nation in Bessarabia,37 and then Soviet policies subsequently
failed to create a Moldovan nation.38 In both cases, the pro-
posed national identity conflicted with local identities and thevalue systems they embodied. In the inter-war period, the low
quality of Romanian administrators sent to Bessarabia seriously
damaged the credibility of the Romanian nation that was sup-
posed to encompass local and regional identities. Rather than
acknowledging the superiority of the Romanian nation as an over-
arching form of political and cultural community, Bessarabias
inhabitants continued to place a high value on Moldovan identity,
despite considering the Moldovan language unfit for public use.Yet, when later Soviet policies emphasized the rural dimensions of
East European Politics and Societies 605
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
20/24
Moldovan identity, they also failed to convince first linguists and
then the educated public.39 In both cases, national identities failed
because they did not attain local standards of moral integrity and
truth, despite being historically and sociologically defensible.This twice-repeated failure of nation-building on the territory
of todays Republic of Moldova invites further consideration of
the dynamics between national and non-national forms of iden-
tity in the region. First and significantly, local Moldovan identity
has resisted both subordination as a regional component of a
national identity, and elaboration into a national identity per
se. This fact should draw our attention to a local value hierarchy
in which the rural and local are valued in opposition to a centralstate, even as literacy and the markers of high culture are also
valued. The rejection of the Soviet version of the Moldovan
nation in the 1980s should therefore not be interpreted as evidence
that the real national identity of Moldovas ethnic majority is
simply Romanian. Both termsMoldovan andRomanianare
attached to more complex associations, values, and memories
based on the relations between state and local forms of power,
rural and urban experiences, and the opportunities that comewith each (e.g., education). Depending on the social, moral, and
cultural qualities with which they are infused, either term may be
used to adequately capture the dynamics of local identity. In the
hands of both the Romanian and Soviet states, however, each
term has proved inadequate.
Rather than trying to arbitrate between the application of one
ethnonym over the other, scholars studying the Moldovan-
Romanian question are in a position to say at least two impor-tant things about nationalism and nation-building. On one hand,
Moldovas experience with failed nation-building should encour-
age a reconsideration of constructivist accounts of nationalism
and nation-building.40 In contrast to Ernest Gellners assertion
that any old shred and patch [of culture] will serve the inter-
ests of a state in constructing a national identity that secures its
citizens loyalty,41 Moldovas history demonstrates that people
may collectively reject an identity, even if they originally acceptedit. Indeed, even if the parameters of an identity are imagined by
the state or its agents, the identity can only become a social
606 Moldovan Villages and the Politics of Nationalism
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
21/24
force if it is authenticated and legitimated by the subjects who
will adopt it.42 Successful identity projects resonate with the
lifeworld of their subjects.Conversely, an identity project is likely
to fail if it does not resonate with a groups intersubjectively heldknowledge claims.43 Moldovas history of failed nation-building
projects points to a variety of flaws in the constructivist model,
including the assumption that capitalistic consumption practices
provide a satisfactory analogue for understanding identity.
On the other hand, introducing villages into the discussion
of nationalism and identity politics in Moldova should highlight
the moral and associative dimensions of all forms of collective
identity, including the nation. Alexander Motyls discussionmakes clear that the nation (and the state it represents)
may not be forms of community that resonate with a particu-
lar lifeworld. Or, the nation form may resonate, but not the
particular version and image presented to a community, no
matter how much it draws on existing culture.44 The current
prominence of the village in social discourse, folklore and
the arts, and memories of 1989 points to a form of community
that captures important elements of the lifeworld of con-temporary ethnic Moldovans. Thus, to understand why national
identities have succeeded in part and failed in general, one
needs to ask also about the relationship between the nation and
the village.
Conclusion: Expanding the National Question
From a political perspective, the national question that needsasking is not whether the population inhabits a Romanian or
Moldovan lifeworld, but whether the state has succeeded in
embodying the lifeworld at all. If it has not, then we should also
expect that the state is not fully legitimate in the eyes of its citizens,
and that acknowledgment should transform our approach to ana-
lyzing political developments. We can do this by exploring the roles
of non-ethnic and non-national forms of collective identity, such as
villages, as well as the intersection of these identities with national-ism at critical moments in the regions political evolution.
East European Politics and Societies 607
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
22/24
608 Moldovan Villages and the Politics of Nationalism
Notes
1. Charles King, The Moldovans: Romania, Russia, and the Politics of Culture (Stanford,
Calif.: Hoover Institution Press, 2000), 169-70.
2. Claus Neukirch, National Minorities in the Republic of Moldova: Some Lessons Learned,
Some Not?South-East Europe Review (March 1999): 45-64.3. For an example of this problematization, see Michael Gondek, One Nation, Two States: The
Transition from the Moldovan Soviet Socialist Republic to the Independent Republic of Moldova
and the Politics of Language (masters thesis, Providence College, Rhode Island, 1997).
4. I am using a rounded figure of 65 percent for the ethnic Moldovan population as recorded
in the 1989 census; the 2004 census records a higher percentage (84 percent), but as the
more recent data collection was fraught with difficulties, I err on the conservative side withthe earlier figures. For a close linguistic consideration of the Romanian and Moldovan lan-
guages, see Donald Dyer, The Making of the Moldavian Language, in Studies in
Moldovan: The History, Culture, Language and Contemporary Politics of the People of
Moldova, ed. Donald Dyer (Boulder, Colo.: East European Monographs, 1996).
5. For accounts of the history and demands of the nationalist movement, see William
Crowther, Moldova: Caught between Nation and Empire, in New States, New Politics:Building the Post-Soviet Nations, ed. Ian Bremmer and Ray Taras (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1997); and Roman Solchanyk, Ukraine, Belorussia, and Moldavia: Imperial
Integration, Russification, and the Struggle for National Survival, in The Nationalities
Factor in Soviet Politics and Society, ed. Lubomyr Hajda and Mark Beissiger (Boulder,
Colo.: Westview, 1990).
6. The sense of paradox in Moldovas recent history is also heightened by the dominant his-
toriographical approach of documenting the indisputable Romanian identity of Moldovas
population and the illegitimacy of Soviet rule. Examples of often consulted histories of
Moldova that take this approach include Michael Bruchis, One Step Back, Two Steps
Forward: On the Language Policy of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in the
National Republics (Moldavian: A Look Back, a Survey, and Perspectives, 1924-1980)
(Boulder, Colo.: East European Monographs, 1982); Michael Bruchis, NationsNationalitiesPeople: A Study of the Nationalities Policy of the Communist Party in Soviet
Moldavia (Boulder, Colo.: East European Monographs, 1984); Nicholas Dima, Bessarabia
and Bukovina: The Soviet-Romanian Territorial Dispute (Boulder, Colo.: East European
Monographs, 1982); and Nicholas Dima, From Moldavia to Moldova: The Soviet-
Romanian Territorial Dispute (Boulder, Colo.: East European Monographs, 1991). These
sources contain valuable information, but treat the question of political legitimacy exter-nally as a choice between two alternative states; they do not treat the question of legitimacy
itself as perceived internally and locally.
7. Stuart Kaufman, Spiraling to Ethnic War: Elites, Masses, and Moscow in Moldovas Civil
War,International Security 21 (Fall 1996): 108-38.
8. Most authors identify a constellation of mutually intersecting factors, including some (like
elite politics) not listed separately above. For extended analyses, see King, The Moldovans;and Gondek, One Nation, Two States. The results of political opinion surveys given to
Romanian citizens, ethnic Moldovans, and minority citizens of the Republic of Moldova are
reported by William Crowther, The Construction of Moldovan National Consciousness,
in Beyond Borders: Remaking Cultural Identities in the New East and Central Europe,
ed. Lszl Krti and Juliet Langman (Boulder, Colo.: Westview, 1997).
9. King, The Moldovans, 148-49, 166.
10. Tom Gallagher,Romania after Ceausescu (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1995), 187.
11. Tom Gallagher, Nationalism and Romanian Political Culture in the 1990s, in Post-
Communist Romania: Coming to Terms with the Transition, ed. Duncan Light and David
Phinnemore (Houndsmill, UK: Palgrave, 2001), 104-24.
12. Irina Livezeanu, Cultural Politics in Greater Romania: Regionalism, Nation-Building,
and Ethnic Struggle, 1918-1930 (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1995), 100-1.13. Several authors report contemporary assessments of Romanian administration in
Bessarabia; among them are King, The Moldovans, 41-51; and Livezeanu, Cultural Politics.
14. The woman quoted above, for instance, speaks from a mix of perspectives. Born into
a mixed Jewish-Moldovan family in the town of Calaras, she now lives in the capital and
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
23/24
East European Politics and Societies 609
self-identifies only as Moldovan. Although she was a factory worker, her sisters family is an
intellectual family, with some members having been active in the nationalist movement.
15. This anecdote should not be taken to reflect widespread favorable memories of the German
presence in Moldova, however, as there are also many negative memories, including stories
of family members having been abducted and sent to work in German factories. Rather, this
argument should be interpreted as reflecting on the negative memories of both Russian-Soviet and Romanian rule. While individuals tend to portray one ruler as worse than the
other (as with the man above who preferred Soviet rule), this particular discussion
resolved itself in an agreement about what life should be like (orderly, clean, respect for
women, and pay for goods and service) instead of a stalemate between the two sides.
16. Folkloric involvement with late-Soviet nationalist movements was not isolated to Moldova;Padraic Kenney and Mary Doi document some of the other possible connections between
folklore and nationalism in Ukraine and Uzbekistan, respectively. See Padraic Kenney, ACarnival of Revolution: Central Europe 1989 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press,
2002); and Mary Doi, Gesture, Gender, Nation: Dance and Social Change in Uzbekistan(Westport, Conn.: Bergin and Garvey, 2002).
17. For a longer discussion of the relationship between ethnicity and authenticity in these folk-
loric performances, see Jennifer Cash, In Search of an Authentic Nation: FolkloricEnsembles, Ethnography, and Ethnicity in the Republic of Moldova (Ph.D. diss., Indiana
University, 2004).
18. John Cole, Anthropology Comes Part-Way Home: Community Studies in Europe,Annual
Review of Anthropology 6 (1977): 349-78; Joel Martin Halpern and David Kideckel,
Anthropology of Eastern Europe, Annual Review of Anthropology 12 (1983): 377-402;
Tams Hofer, Anthropologists and Native Ethnographers in Central European Villages:
Comparative Notes on the Professional Personality of Two Disciplines, Current
Anthropology 9, no. 4 (1968): 311-15; and Bela Maday, Hungarian Anthropology: The
Problem of Communication, Current Anthropology 9, nos. 2-3 (1968): 180-84.
19. In accordance with the respondents wishes, names have not been changed. It would, in
addition, be futile to do so considering that these individuals are public figures and have
achieved wide recognition for their artistic work. For consistency, however, I maintain theconvention of replacing last names with an initial that was adopted by the Romanian pub-
lishers for the earlier version of this article.
20. Talancuta is the diminutive form of talanca and talanga, both Romanian words for the
bell put on the necks of cows and sheep.
21. R. A. Frenchs analysis of urbanization throughout the Soviet Union suggests that the ongo-ing housing shortage worked to prevent the social stratification of cities, neighborhoods,
and apartment buildings as much as, if not more than, planning strategies themselves.
Although individuals tried to influence their housing placement, they were thankful to get
whatever was offered. R. A. French, The Individuality of the Soviet City, in The Socialist
City: Spatial Structure and Urban Policy, ed. R. A. French and F. E. Ian Hamilton
(Chichester, UK: Wiley, 1979), 98.
22. King (in The Moldovans, 131-42) also points to the existence and importance of such net-works in building the national movement.
23. Gerhard Simon,Nationalism and Policy toward the Nationalities in the Soviet Union: From
Totalitarian Dictatorship to Post-Stalinist Society, trans. Karen and Oswald Forster (Boulder,
Colo.: Westview, 1991); and Ronald Suny, State, Civil Society and Ethnic Cultural
Consolidation in the USSR: The Roots of the National Question, in The Soviet System: From
Crisis to Collapse, ed. Alexander Dallin and G. W. Lapides (Boulder, Colo.: Westview, 1995).
24. Simon,Nationalism and Policy.
25. Mary Grace Swift, The Art of the Dance in the U.S.S.R. (Notre Dame, Ind.: Notre Dame
Press, 1968), 204-20.
26. Irina Livezeanu, Urbanization in a Low Key and Linguistic Change in Soviet Moldavia, Part
1,Soviet Studies 33, no. 3 (1981): 335.
27. Livezeanu, Urbanization, Part 1, 334.28. Livezeanu, Cultural Politics, 93-97.
29. Irina Livezeanu, Urbanization in a Low Key and Linguistic Change in Soviet Moldavia, Part
2,Soviet Studies 33, no. 4 (1981): 581.
distribution. 2007 American Council of Learned Societies. All rights reserved. Not for commercial use or unauthorized
by Dragos Dragoman on November 12, 2007http://eep.sagepub.comDownloaded from
http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/http://eep.sagepub.com/7/28/2019 Origins Memory and Identity Villages and the Politics of Nationalism in the RM
24/24
30. Maurice Halbwachs, On Collective Memory, ed. and trans. Lewis Coser (Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 1992).
31. Jolle Bahloul, The Architecture of Memory: A Jewish-Muslim Household in Colonial
Algeria, 1937-62 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 28.
32. James Ferguson, The Country and the City on the Copperbelt, in Culture, Power, Place:
Explorations in Critical Anthropology, ed. Akhil Gupta and James Ferguson (Durham,N.C.: Duke University Press, 1997).
33. Translatable as the sole of the earth, the phrase talpa tarii refers to the peasantry, specif-
ically reflecting the understanding that in the past, [the peasantry] was considered the
countrys foundation, obliged to carry the full difficulty of duties; see Dictionarul
Explicativ al Limbii Romne (Bucharest: Editura Univers Enciclopedic, 1998), 1068.34. During the summer of 2006, a young music teacher was musing on the differences she imag-
ined to exist between the United States and Moldova. You, she concluded, are Stateleunite; we aresatele unite (You are the United States; we are the united villages). Retelling
this anecdote to a group of historians after having presented my research to them, an older
historian responded, Indeed, our problem is that we are not as united as we should be.
35. Andrew Lass, From Memory to History: The Events of November 17 Dis/Membered, in
Memory, History, and Opposition under State Socialism, ed. Rubie Watson (Santa Fe,N.M.: School of American Research Press, 1994).
36. Eric Wolf,Europe and the People without History (Berkeley: University of California Press,
1982).
37. Livezeanu, Cultural Politics.
38. King, The Moldovans.
39. Charles King, The Politics of Language in Moldova, 1924-1994 (Ph.D. thesis, University of
Oxford, 1995).
40. Examples of the constructivist perspective include such often cited scholars as Benedict
Anderson,Imagined Communities (New York: Verso, 1991); Ernest Gellner,Nations and
Nationalism (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1983); and Eric Hobsbawm and
Terence Ranger, eds., The Invention of Tradition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1983). The commonality in these approaches is to view collective identities, particularlythose of ethnic groups and nations, not as givens but as historical, cultural, political, soci-
ological, and even economic artifacts produced under certain conditions. Modern states,
in particular, are given primary control over creating, disseminating, and controlling
national identities through the production of images and information. For this reason,
Michael Herzfeld adds imaged to the list of modes (such as invention and imagination)in which nations are produced, reflecting the heavy emphasis that constructivists place on
representation. Michael Herzfeld, Localism and the Logic of Nationalistic Folklore: Cretan
Reflections, Comparative Studies in Society and History (2003): 281-310, 307 n. 19.
41. Gellner,Nations and Nationalism, 56.
42. Gupta and Ferguson, Culture, Power, Place.
43. Alexander Motyl, Inventing Invention: The Limits of National Identity Formation, in
Intellectuals and the Articulation of the Nation, ed. Ronald Grigor Suny and MichaelKennedy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001), 62.
44. Royces concept of double boundaries also speaks to these issues. She notes that ethnic
groups do not have a single boundary but a double one, because members of an ethnic com-
munity use different and usually more subtle criteria to recognize their common identity
than do outsiders who define them. Whereas outsiders tend to focus on common cultural
traits (e.g., language), insiders may emphasize subtler issues involving the proper perfor-
mance of group values. Anya Peterson Royce, Ethnic Identity: Strategies of Diversity(Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982). In this respect, Spicers discussion of persis-
tent identities is also relevant, as he notes that for many groups, the cultural markers that ini-
tially distinguish them can change almost completely without the group losing its distinct
identity. Again, cultural identity requires a combination of values and cultural elements
through which those values can be embodied and communicated. Edward Spicer, PersistentCultural Systems: A Comparative Study of Identity Systems that Can Adapt to Contrasting
Environments,Science 174 (1971): 795-800.
610 Moldovan Villages and the Politics of Nationalism