Orcel vs apligraf v4

Post on 14-Jun-2015

1.493 views 3 download

Tags:

description

Diabetic Foot Ulcer FDA Approved Treatment

Transcript of Orcel vs apligraf v4

Comparisons Between OrCel and Apligraf

Comparative Histological ProfilesComparative Histological Profiles

Apligraf OrCel

Fully Differentiated andStratified Keratinocytes

Partially Differentiated, Non-Stratified “Wound Healing”

(Migrating & Replicating) Keratinocytes

Low Density Dermal Fibroblasts, Many Undergoing Apoptosis

Medium Density, Vigorously Growing Dermal Fibroblasts

(15% “Dividing” Cells)

In Vitro expression of KGF and GMCSF by cultured LSE and ORCEL

1

1000

1000000

KGF GM-CSF

Cyt

oki

ne

Ou

tpu

t P

er u

nit

Are

a, p

g/c

m2/

day LSE

ORCEL

Living Skin Equivalent (LSE) is a generic name for Apligraf

Output, OrCel vs. Apligraf

10

100

1000

10000

100000

bFGF GM-CSF HGF KGF-1 VEGF IL-1a MMP-9 PGE-2

Cyt

oki

ne

Pro

du

ctiv

ity,

pg

/cm

2 /d

ay

OrCel Apligraf

Pro-mitotic Pro-Inflammatory

OrCel in Donor Site Healing(Independent Physician Evaluation:

Donor Site Treated with both OrCel & Apligraf)

OrCel

ApligrafOrCel: Faster healing, less inflammation

Days to100% Healing

(Median)

OrCel

Standard of Care

DONOR SITESDONOR SITES

Pivotal: 2/01

Based on Photography

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

2222 Days

15 Days

PMA Claims

•Accelerated healing

•Less Scarring

•Reduced time to recropping

OrCel OrCel ™™ Heals Heals Wounds FasterWounds Faster

47%

23%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Diabetic Foot Ulcers Pilot Trial

% of Patients Achieving 100% Wound Closure

By 12 Weeks

OrCel

OrCel

Standard of Care

Standard Of Care

Summary of OrCel® vs. Apligraf® FeaturesFeature OrCel® Apligraf®

Shape/Size Square 6.5 x 6.5 x 0.09 cm (42 cm2) Round 75mm diam x 0.75mm (44cm2)

Matrix Preformed porous cross-linked bovine collagen sponge, very pliant

Contracted, dense, stiff bovine collagen gel

Keratinocytes (K) Immature mono-/bilayer (submerged culture condition)

Stratified multilayer (air interface culture condition)

Fibroblasts (F) Healthy vigorously dividing Dormant or apoptotic

Cell type ratio Nominal ~90% F ~10% K Nominal ~30% F ~70% K

Cytokine profile F (& F/K co-culture) dominated; activated “wound healing” profile

K (& F/K co-culture) dominated; normal skin steady state dormant profile

Ease of use Semi-auto thaw/rinse (~20 min) & direct application

Remove from dish, cut to size, fenestrate (~20 min)

Shelf life 7 mo (clin. trial); expect 12 – 18 mo 10 days in sealed pkg.

Current reimbursement

$1,100./42 cm2 $1,200/44 cm2

Summary: OrCel® vs. Apligraf® Data

• Pilot ORCEL (fresh) VLU trial data achieved closure in 12 weeks (59% vs. 36%) comparable to adjusted (Cox) Apligraf results at 6 months (56.8% vs. 39.8%); pivotal ORCEL (cryopreserved) clinical data are similar (50% vs. 31%).

• Pilot ORCEL DFU trial data achieve results within 12 weeks (47% vs. 23%) comparable to Apligraf (56% vs. 39%) at 12 weeks (SOC differed)

• ORCEL is easier to apply• ORCEL, since cryopreserved, has far superior shelf life (7-

12 months+ (projected) vs. 10 days) and can also be stored at the clinical site for “off-the-shelf” availability