Optimal De-Centralized Smart Home-Charging: Potential Study · EVs status (2017) 1.1 million sold...

Post on 01-Jun-2020

1 views 0 download

Transcript of Optimal De-Centralized Smart Home-Charging: Potential Study · EVs status (2017) 1.1 million sold...

Optimal De-Centralized Smart Home-Charging: Potential Study

Mahmoud Shepero Reza Fachrizal Joakim Munkhammar

Built Environment Energy Systems Group (BEESG)Uppsala university

15 October 2018

1 / 14

Outline

Current EV status

Charging algorithms

ResultsHouseholds’ LoadSmart chargingCapacity-fillingSummary of resultsFuture work

2 / 14

EVs status

• (2017) 1.1 million sold EVs ⇒ 3.1 million EVs in the world.

• (2030) 1/3 of new car sales EVI 30@30.

• (2040) 1/3 of cars globally BNEF.

3 / 14

Charging algorithms

Uncontrolled charging

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

Time

0

5

10

Pow

er (

kW)

Postponed charging

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

Time

0

5

10

Pow

er (

kW)

Capacity-filling

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

Time

0

5

10

Pow

er (

kW)

4 / 14

Charging algorithms

Uncontrolled charging

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

Time

0

5

10

Pow

er (

kW)

Postponed charging

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

Time

0

5

10

Pow

er (

kW)

Capacity-filling

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

Time

0

5

10

Pow

er (

kW)

4 / 14

Charging algorithms

Uncontrolled charging

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

Time

0

5

10

Pow

er (

kW)

Postponed charging

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

Time

0

5

10

Pow

er (

kW)

Capacity-filling

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

Time

0

5

10

Pow

er (

kW)

4 / 14

Postponed charging vs Capacity-filling

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

Time

0

5

10

Pow

er (

kW)

5 / 14

Postponed charging vs Capacity-filling

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

Time

0

5

10

Pow

er (

kW)

5 / 14

Postponed charging vs Capacity-filling

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

Time

0

5

10

Pow

er (

kW)

5 / 14

Postponed charging vs Capacity-filling

Postponed charging

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

Time

0

5

10

Pow

er (

kW)

Capacity-filling

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

12:0

0

00:0

0

Time

0

5

10

Pow

er (

kW)

6 / 14

Households’ Load

• Widen’s model [1] ⇒ 10 detachedhouses, no electric heating,2 inhabitants.

• Peak load = 6 kW.

0 2000 4000 6000Power (kW)

0

2

4

6

pdf

10-3

7 / 14

Households’ Load

• Widen’s model [1] ⇒ 10 detachedhouses, no electric heating,2 inhabitants.

• Peak load = 6 kW.

0 2000 4000 6000Power (kW)

0

2

4

6

pdf

10-3

7 / 14

Postponed charging

Number of days

0 4 5

0 3 3 5

0 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 8

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

11

14

17

24

35

44

3.7 6.9 7.3 11 22Charging power (kW)

Fus

e si

ze (

kW)

Charging delay

00:00 03:38 03:59

00:00 00:32 00:50 00:32

00:00 00:01 00:02 00:21

00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:03

00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00

00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00

11

14

17

24

35

44

3.7 6.9 7.3 11 22Charging power (kW)

Fus

e si

ze (

kW)

8 / 14

Postponed charging

Number of days

0 4 5

0 3 3 5

0 1 1 1

0 0 0 0 8

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

11

14

17

24

35

44

3.7 6.9 7.3 11 22Charging power (kW)

Fus

e si

ze (

kW)

Charging delay

00:00 03:38 03:59

00:00 00:32 00:50 00:32

00:00 00:01 00:02 00:21

00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:03

00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00

00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00 00:00

11

14

17

24

35

44

3.7 6.9 7.3 11 22Charging power (kW)

Fus

e si

ze (

kW)

8 / 14

Capacity-filling

Number of days

364 363 362

364 364 364 327

364 364 364 355

364 364 364 362 198

364 364 364 362 351

364 364 364 362 354

11

14

17

24

35

44

3.7 6.9 7.3 11 22Charging power (kW)

Fus

e si

ze (

kW)

Charging haste

01:30 00:26 00:22

01:41 00:37 00:33 00:10

01:48 00:44 00:40 00:16

01:57 00:53 00:49 00:25 00:03

02:04 01:00 00:56 00:32 00:09

02:07 01:03 00:59 00:35 00:12

11

14

17

24

35

44

3.7 6.9 7.3 11 22Charging power (kW)

Fus

e si

ze (

kW)

9 / 14

Capacity-filling

Number of days

364 363 362

364 364 364 327

364 364 364 355

364 364 364 362 198

364 364 364 362 351

364 364 364 362 354

11

14

17

24

35

44

3.7 6.9 7.3 11 22Charging power (kW)

Fus

e si

ze (

kW)

Charging haste

01:30 00:26 00:22

01:41 00:37 00:33 00:10

01:48 00:44 00:40 00:16

01:57 00:53 00:49 00:25 00:03

02:04 01:00 00:56 00:32 00:09

02:07 01:03 00:59 00:35 00:12

11

14

17

24

35

44

3.7 6.9 7.3 11 22Charging power (kW)

Fus

e si

ze (

kW)

9 / 14

Summary of results

• Postponed charging is rarely needed (only 8 days a year).

• Postponed charging causes at most 4 hours of charging delay.

• Capacity-filling charging shortens the charging time at least 200 days a year.

10 / 14

Future work

• Controlled charging with unbalanced3-phase load.

• Impacts of the controlled chargingschemes on the aggregate load.

11 / 14

?Mahmoud Shepero

mahmoud.shepero@angstrom.uu.se

12 / 14

References I

[1] Joakim Widen and Ewa Wackelgard. A high-resolution stochastic model ofdomestic activity patterns and electricity demand. Applied Energy, 87(6):1880–1892, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.11.006.

13 / 14

Residential arrivals on weekdays

00:00 01:0002:00

03:00

04:00

05:00

06:00

07:00

08:00

09:00

10:0011:0012:0013:00

14:00

15:00

16:00

17:00

18:00

19:00

20:00

21:00

22:0023:00

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

14 / 14

Residential arrivals on weekends

00:00 01:0002:00

03:00

04:00

05:00

06:00

07:00

08:00

09:00

10:0011:0012:0013:00

14:00

15:00

16:00

17:00

18:00

19:00

20:00

21:00

22:0023:00

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

14 / 14