Opportunities for extra credit: Keep checking at: .

Post on 31-Mar-2015

213 views 1 download

Tags:

Transcript of Opportunities for extra credit: Keep checking at: .

Opportunities for extra credit:

Keep checking at:

www.tatalab.ca

March 22

More about conscious perceptionOverview of Memory

March 24

Sensory Memory

March 29

Short-Term/Working Memory (Brooks expt. 1)

March 31

Long-Term Memory

April 5

NO CLASS

April 7

Long-Term Memory and False Memories (Loftus)

April 12Consciousness and “Perception without Awareness”

Subliminal Messages (Vokey and Read)

April 14

Memes (Dawkins)

Upcoming

Overview of Memory

• Atkinson-Shiffrin Model

Sensory Signals

Sensory Memory

Short-Term Memory

Long-Term Memory

ATTENTION

REHEARSAL

RETRIEVAL

“Types” of Memory

• Sensory Memory– brief ( < 1 second)– preattentive / parallel processing (very

large capacity)

Sensory Memory

Capacity

• Describe a simple experiment that could measure the capacity of “memory”

Capacity

• Describe a simple experiment that could measure the capacity of “memory”

• Briefly present some letters or digits and then ask the subject to report them– Called “whole report”

Capacity

+

Capacity

F S F EG S A UT O C G

+

Capacity

“Recall as many letters as you can”

Capacity

• George Sperling - Systematic investigation of memory capacity

– Result: subjects accurately recall 3 or 4 items

– What can you conclude from this result?

– Maybe subjects can only hold 3 or 4 items?

Capacity

• Could it be that subjects had encoded all the letters but failed to retrieve the information?

Capacity

• For example: What if they forgot the information before they could report it?– You would get the same result!

• How could you modify the experiment to measure the instantaneous capacity, before any forgetting can occur?

Capacity

• Partial Report - briefly present letters or digits and ask subject to report only some of them

“Report the letters in the row indicated by the arrow”

Capacity

+

Capacity

U E S BO D W AI B V S

+

Capacity

+

Capacity

+

Capacity

Which Letters?

Capacity

• Partial Report

• Result: subjects can recall any 3 or 4 letters that are indicated by the arrow !

Capacity

• Partial Report

• Result: subjects can recall any 3 or 4 letters that are indicated by the arrow !

• What does this mean about the capacity of memory?

Capacity

• There is some part of the perception system that stores huge amounts of information…

– in fact, if only a single letter is probed, instantaneous capacity is seen to be unlimited

Duration

• There is some part of the perception system that stores huge amounts of information…

• But for how long? How would you design an experiment to measure the duration of this high-capacity memory system?

Duration

• There is some part of the perception system that stores huge amounts of information…

• But for how long? How would you design an experiment to measure the duration of this high-capacity memory system?

• Vary the onset of the probe

Duration

• Partial Report

Probe Delay

# of letterspotentially recalled

500 ms0 ms never

0

4

10

Duration

• Partial Report

Delay

# of letters potentiallyrecalled

Interpretation:1. Information dwells in a brief storage “buffer”2. duration of storage lasts about 1/2 of one second

500 ms0 ms never

0

4

10

Iconic Memory

• a brief storage of “raw data” in the visual system

Echoic Memory

• Auditory information is stored in a similar sensory “buffer”– Echoic memory seems to last for several

seconds

Properties of Sensory Memory

1. Brief (iconic ~500ms; echoic ~2 seconds)

Properties of Sensory Memory

1. Brief (iconic ~500ms; echoic ~2 seconds)

2. Virtually unlimited capacity

Properties of Sensory Memory

1. Brief (iconic ~500ms; echoic ~2 seconds)

2. Virtually unlimited capacity

3. pre-attentive

Overview of Memory

• Atkinson-Shiffrin Model

Sensory Signals

Sensory Memory

Short-Term Memory

Long-Term Memory

ATTENTION

REHEARSAL

RETRIEVAL

Short-Term Memory

• process by which we hold information “in mind”

Short-Term Memory

• process by which we hold information “in mind”

• example: temporarily remembering a phone number

Characteristics of STM

• Duration? Capacity?

• How could one measure these parameters?

Characteristics of STM

• Limited Duration– Brown-Petersen Task:

• subject is given a trigram (e.g. C-F-W) to remember

• vocal rehearsal is prevented by counting backwards

• recall accuracy tested as a function of retention interval

Characteristics of STM

• STM decays over seconds

Characteristics of STM

• Limited Duration– Brown-Petersen Task Interpretation: rapid

loss of information in STM (over a period of seconds…much longer than sensory memory)

Characteristics of STM

• Limited Capacity– How might you measure capacity?

Characteristics of STM

• Limited Capacity– George Miller – Subject is given longer and longer lists of to-

be-remembered items (words, characters, digits)

Characteristics of STM

• Limited Capacity– George Miller – Subject is given longer and longer lists of to-

be-remembered items (words, characters, digits)

– Result: Subjects are successful up to about 7 items

Characteristics of STM

• Limited Capacity– What confound must be considered ?!

Characteristics of STM

• Limited Capacity– What confound must be considered ?!– Recalling takes time !

Characteristics of STM

• Limited Capacity– What confound must be considered ?!– Recalling takes time !– It seems that the “capacity” of STM (at least

measured in this way) depends on the rate of speech - faster speech leads to apparently larger capacity

– Some believe capacity is “2 - 3 seconds worth of speech”

Forgetting from STM

• Why do we “forget” from STM?– Does the memory trace decay?

• not likely because with very small lists (like 1 item) retention is high for long intervals

Forgetting from STM

• Why do we “forget” from STM?– Does the memory trace decay?

• not likely because with very small lists (like 1 item) retention is high for long intervals

– Instead, it seems that information “piles up” and begins to interfere

Forgetting from STM

• Interference in STM is complex and specific

Forgetting from STM

• Interference in STM is complex and specific

• For example, severity of interference depends on meaning

Forgetting from STM

• Interference in STM is complex and specific

• For example, severity of interference depends on meaning– Subjects are given successive recall tasks with

list items from the same category (e.g. fruits)– final list is of either same or different category -

how is good is recall on this list?

Forgetting from STM

• Accuracy rebounds if category changes

Coding in STM

• How is information coded in STM?

Coding in STM

• Clues about coding in STM:– # of items stored in STM depends on rate of

speech

Coding in STM

• Clues about coding in STM:– # of items stored in STM depends on rate of

speech– phonological similarity effect: similar sounding

words are harder to store/recall than different sounding words

Coding in STM

• Clues about coding in STM:– # of items stored in STM depends on rate of

speech– phonological similarity effect: similar sounding

words are harder to store/recall than different sounding words

What does this suggest about the nature of information in STM?

Coding in STM

• It seems that information can be stored in a linguistic or phonological form

Coding in STM

• It seems that information can be stored in a linguistic or phonological form

Must it be stored this way?

Coding in STM

• It is also possible to “keep in mind” non-verbal information, such as a map

Are there two different STM systems?

Read Intro and Expt. 1 in article Brooks