Online LSNTAP / PBN 2014 Webinar

Post on 16-May-2015

397 views 2 download

Tags:

description

This webinar will review online intake, what it is, how it fits in the delivery of legal services continuum, and share two models of how two different programs have implemented it. Our examples from WA and NH will cover how online intake overlaps with telephonic intake and in person intake and how these programs manage online intake to promote access to legal services. We will then discuss the nuts and bolts of what legal non-profits need to be aware of and know before they start an online intake from a technology point of view. We will wrap up with an example of how to use intake data to facilitate and support regional resource allocation and collaboration across agencies as a way to promote systemic regional advocacy and effective resource allocation. The training will be helpful for those considering online intake projects, or for groups already doing online intake who are looking for examples/ideas of how other groups are maximizing the potential of online intake and its fruits. Attendees are strongly encourages to review prior online intake presentations available at (http://lsntap.org/Internet_Intake_Webcasts) as background, but not required.

Transcript of Online LSNTAP / PBN 2014 Webinar

If you joined the training via telephone, please click on the telephone symbol and select “Call by phone” and follow the instructions.

If you joined with a microphone and headset or speakers (VoIP), please click on the telephone symbol and select “Call via the internet”

We will start promptly at the hour.

Welcome to the LSNTAP/PBN Online Intake webinar!

If you joined the training via telephone, please click on the telephone symbol and select “Call by phone” and follow the instructions.

If you joined with a microphone and headset or speakers (VoIP), please click on the telephone symbol and select “Call via the internet”

Ask a question or tell us something in the Comment box.

PLEASE PLACE YOURSELF ON MUTE.

A few logistics before we start…

LSNTAP is recording this training and will post it to LSNTAP.org.

An email with a link to this information will be sent out to the LSTech listserv once it has been posted.

Online intake: The “whats” and the “whys” of online intake

August 20, 2014  

Our panel todayBob AubinParalegal and Self-Employed DeveloperBreckie Hayes-SnowDeputy Director, Legal Advice & Referral Center Joan KleinbergDirector of CLEAR/Private Bar Development, Northwest Justice ProjectEd MarksExecutive Director, New Mexico Legal Aid

Claudia Johnson (Moderator)LawHelp Interactive Program Manager, Pro Bono Net

Takeaways• Two examples in the

community• Technology• Data sharing/outcomes

7

Why intake?

What is intake?

Do you qualify for this program with your problem and for what specific type of service?

Yes—how are we going to work together in providing you legal services? Retainer/conflicts/case plan

No—what can you do to help yourself—what type of information and referrals can we give you to help yourself

Pro Bono Net, NPADO 8

9

Different types of “intake”• Walk in intake• Hotlines• Online intake

Not intake, but grouped as intake sometimes• Triage• Expert system• Checklists/self assessment

tools

Rules, Standards, and protocols that apply to intake depending on modality

Pro Bono Net, NPADO 10

Context/factors/incentives• Keep costs down• Internet is open 24/7. Seek help/volume up• Staff/tech resources ratio varies by modality of

intake

11

Online intake

Pro Bono Net, NPADO 12

Wired Broad Band, DSL, Fiber, Cable

Wireless, hotspots, satellite

Online Intake

• No ABA standards (yet?)—but new model rules do have provisions under the competency standard

• LSC has requirements of human verification of eligibility

Pro Bono Net, NPADO 15

Model Rules 1.1 Competency (2012)

Maintaining Competence• [8] To maintain the requisite knowledge and skill, a lawyer should keep abreast of

changes in the law and its practice, including the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology, engage in continuing study and education and comply with all continuing legal education requirements to which the lawyer is subject.

Pro Bono Net, NPADO 16

LSC Program Letter

Pro Bono Net, NPADO 17

Pros of online intake

Pro Bono Net, NPADO 18

Factors for online intake•Are the case acceptance guidance stable?•Is there a solid understand of what cases get accepted by problem type?

•Is there a strong IT team?

Pro Bono Net, NPADO 19

Some examples of online intake

• Ohio (English Spanish—model for many others) http://www.lawolaw.org/

• Utah, nice handling of Kennedy amendment and verification process

• https://onlineintake.utahlegalservices.org/

20

Other examples Online Intake

• Florida/Daytona (Kemps)• Detroit (Practice Manager)• TRLA (wufoo for family law cases)• Pennsylvania (runs off LHI)• NJP/portal concept

Pro Bono Net, NPADO 21

Northwest Justice ProjectOnline Intake

Washington State

Joan Kleinbergjoank@nwjustice.org

The process of development

• Articulate your goals• The logic model• The user interface

• Alternative mode of access • Triage potential callers• Provide resources

NJP’s Goals Online Intake and Triage

Branch Logic aka “The Starship Enterprise”-Allows for LPC and SLPC to be resolved.-Leads to determination of next steps (who calls who) and correct referrals and resources

You’ve got to have a system. Excel is your friend.

Policy Decisions

• What information are you comfortable gathering on-line?

• How will you make allowances for incorrect information?

• How will you handle LSC requirement to notify all applicants of grievance process?

User Interface

• Break it down to simple questions• Use plain language • Test questions and answers for ambiguity• Anticipate user questions

Online Applications

Demographics

Online intake applicants are:

50% whiter

Much, much younger

Significantly more female

About the same income distribution

Lessons Learned

To see NJP online tool:http://nwjustice.org/get-legal-help

Please use: “name Test Test” if you want to test it

Legal Advice and Referral CenterOnline Intake

New Hampshire

Breckie Hayes-Snow

Necessity – the mother of Implementation

General Timeline

• Legal Advice & Referral Center: 3/96 – today• September 2009 telephone system crash – total failure• Online intake implemented to provide access.• 2012 intake integration with NHLA• Small grant from New Hampshire Charitable Foundation to

fund new system• Collaboration to create LARCOI – launched in March 2013• NHBar Pro Bono Program adopts LegalServer in summer of

2013

Ongoing projects• Integration of intake among all three NH programs:

LARC, NHLA, NHBar• Direct transfer of cases from LARCOI to LARC, NHLA

and NHBar • Creation of additional applications

• Bankruptcy• Criminal annulment• Domestic violence (for special project)

A Developer’s Perspective on creating online intake systems

Bob Aubin

44

Typical A2J Intake Configuration

• 3 logical components • Each managed/provided by a different vendor or

entity• Strict rules apply (schema, answer formats)• Someone must orchestrate how they work

together

45

46

47

48

49

What Does XSLT Do?

• Converts and formats A2J .anx to .xml• Math and rounding• Variable to field mapping• Full name and full address creation• Date reformatting

• A2J date format = DD/MM/YYYY• CMS needs MM/DD/YYYY

• State abbreviations• Notes field compiling and formatting

50

What Does PHP Do?• Maps to XSLT file (.anx .xsl)• Names XML file (can include applicant name)• Save and name a back-up of answer file• Redirect to a web page based on answer

pattern/area of law/location• Keep track of types of kick-outs• Create and save a survey file in a spreadsheet• Cause e-mail to be sent

51

52

Kemp’s Case WorksA2J Interview Direct Import

Intake with No Transformation

• Raw answer file sent to CMS via a web page• Rounding, abbreviations, notes, and

formatting must be done in A2J• Dates are problematic

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

Things You Have to Provide

Variable-to-Field Mapping

• Variables from A2J feed into CMS fields• Married = M• Government benefits = 153• English = en

• What variables/fields do you need?• What can schema accommodate?

60

What Do You Need and Want?• Track kick-outs?• Compile survey information?• E-mail?• Redirection?• Answer file and XML file naming

61

Where’s the CMS?• Colocation with web server is best• If not collocated, how will XML get to CMS?

62

Summary• 3 distinct logical components• Needs orchestration to make it work together• Define your wants and needs• Valid and up-to-date schema• A2J version 4.0 for now

63

Bob Aubin

NORTHCOM ASSOCIATES, LLCbob.aubin@northcomassociates.com

64

New Mexico Data Sharing Project

Ed MarksNew Mexico Legal Aid

New Mexico Data Sharing Project

New Mexico Data Sharing Project

.

New Mexico Data Sharing Project

New Mexico Data Sharing Project

New Mexico Data Sharing Project

Discussion/Questions?

THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING TODAY!

Be sure to check out www.lsntap.org for information regarding the next LSTNAP Community

Training!

Contact InformationBrian Rowe (brianr@nwjustice.org) or via chat on www.lsntap.org

Don’t forget to take our feedback survey!