Post on 18-Feb-2018
7/23/2019 On the American Black Campus
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/on-the-american-black-campus 1/11
On the American Black CampusIBRAM ROGERS
In the last forty years, scholars and activists have consistently argued
and reported on the centrality of college students in the global struggles
of 1968. Almost everywhere there were colleges, students were
protesting in Ethiopia, Congo, Senegal, Jamaica, Pakistan, WestGermany, Poland, Japan, Yugoslavia, Great Britain, France, Mexico,
Venezuela, and the United States. Mark Edelman Boren euphemisti-
cally referred to this moment as the ‘‘year of the student.’’ In the United
States, the 1968 student movement has been compartmentalized into
two struggles: one black, one white. Of all of the student struggles that
gripped the global order, it can be argued that the black student
struggle in America in 1968 was one of the more successful in achieving
its aims—diversifying the academy. There is not, however, a single
study on the activities of American black students in the mass of studies
on student struggles in 1968. This essay, a topical and narrativeoverview of the Black Campus Movement in 1968, fills that void in the
literature.
The Black Campus Movement was the protracted struggle of black
students who demanded, and sometimes demonstrated for, a series
of reforms on campuses across America, beginning in the spring of 1965
and ending in the fall of 1972. It was the most significant racial reform
movement in American higher education history. Many of the present
concepts and manifestations of diversity and multiculturalism in
American higher education—from the discipline of African-American
Studies to the legions of black students, administrators, and profes-
sors—emerged from this effort. It is not an overstatement to say that
nearly every element of blackness—from people to programs to
courses—in American higher education in the twenty-first century
owes its existence to thousands of black students who were suspended,
expelled, arrested, imprisoned, exiled, injured, and/or killed waging the
Black Campus Movement.
In the mid-1960s, a newly increased crop of black students at
traditionally white institutions (TWIs) and historically black colleges
Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 21:464–473
Copyright # Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN 1040-2659 print; 1469-9982 online
DOI: 10.1080/10402650903323504
464
7/23/2019 On the American Black Campus
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/on-the-american-black-campus 2/11
and universities (HBCUs) turned its attention away from off-campus
issues like segregation, and increasingly toward on-campus matters,
specifically the absence of black people, programs, facilities, and
courses. These black student nationalists, who were over studentgovernments at HBCUs and organized Black Student Unions (BSUs)
at TWIs, first started advocating reforms through traditional avenues.
But when those became congested, black students launched a series of
protests. The height of these protests was the spring of 1969, when more
than 290 protests disrupted over 200 American institutions. But like a
mountain climber, a social movement cannot reach its peak unless the
conditions are ripe. The events of the Black Campus Movement in 1968
were decisive in creating those conditions.
Black students organized BSUs and assumed control of student
governments at an unprecedented rate in 1968. Their major demandthat year (as it would be for the entire Black Campus Movement) was
the establishment of Black Studies—in the form of courses, inter-
departmental programs, or autonomous departments. The BSU at
California’s San Francisco State College (SF State) first conceived of
the need for Black Studies, the study of people of African descent from
their perspective for their advancement, in the fall of 1966. By the
spring of 1968, the SF State BSU was one of several groups urging
colleges to institutionalize it. On April 16, 1968, Nathan Hare, the
director of the SF State Black Studies program, submitted ‘‘A
Conceptual Proposal for a Department of Black Studies,’’ the first of many proposals that circulated among black campus activists. Some SF
State professors and administrators, fearful of its nationalistic and
revolutionary sentiments, purposefully stalled the institutionalization of
Black Studies. This stalling emerged on a national level, which caused
legions of black students to end their use of traditional channels, by the
fall of 1968, and particularly the spring of 1969, protests were their chief
mode of producing change.
In the spring of 1968, the attention of most black students was on
reforming the college campus. Yet, at historically black South CarolinaState College, the students continued their now two-year crusade to
desegregate a nearby bowling alley. In a demonstration on February 8,
1968, students had built a huge bonfire on campus, separating
themselves from hundreds of police officers. As Henry Smith, a tall
sophomore, standing in front of the crowd attempted to put something
into the fire, the cops began shooting their shotguns. Three students—
Smith and Samuel Hammond, both SC State students, and Delano
Middleton, a local high school student—were killed and at least thirty-
four were wounded. Upon hearing of the Orangeburg Massacre, as it
was called, a black volcano of furor erupted across America. No group
THE AMERICAN BLACK CAMPUS 465
7/23/2019 On the American Black Campus
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/on-the-american-black-campus 3/11
was more perturbed than black students. Demanding revenge, H. Rap
Brown, a Black Power leader, declared, ‘‘If it takes twenty to thirty
million Blacks to tear up the country, we’ll do it.’’
Most of the black campus activists did not tear up the country. The
Orangeburg Massacre did, however, tear up many passive minds,
and activist ones were formed in their stead. It was the first of two
tragic events that spring of 1968 that pushed throngs of black students
to the left and set the stage for the momentous spring of 1969. Howard
University in Washington, D.C. became the epicenter for protest in
reaction to the killings at South Carolina State. Participating students
created and distributed a pamphlet entitled the ‘‘Orangeburg
Ultimatum.’’ It was the first major effort of HBCU campus activists
to insist on a Black University—geared openly to the promotion andadvancement of African-American culture and their communities,
which would replace what the students’ referred to as Negro
Universities that were oriented clandestinely toward the furthering of
white society and culture. The reactions like those students at Howard
University did not halt or deter the advance of state-sanctioned
violence. Two weeks after the Orangeburg Massacre, Mississippi police
wounded six black students at Alcorn A&M College when they fired
into a crowd of protesters. The officers in Mississippi and South
Carolina never had to pay for the killing and wounding of students in
criminal or civil court. American higher education would, however,through the might of black campus activism.
In March 1968, at Connecticut’s Yale University and Indiana
University, black students staged a two-day boycott and marched on
the president’s office, respectively, while Howard students intensified
their struggle to build a Black University. On March 20, some twelve
hundred students took over Howard’s administration building. A few
days later, the administration and trustees yielded to most of their
demands, resulting in the students exiting the building. Campus
activists at other HBCUs were inspired to activate themselves by the
Orangeburg Massacre and the nationally publicized Howard demon-
stration. Students demonstrated in March and April 1968 for their
‘‘Negro’’ universities to be reformed into ‘‘Black’’ universities at
Mississippi’s Tougaloo College, Alabama’s Tuskegee Institute,
Tennessee’s Fisk University, Maryland’s Morgan State College and
Bowie State College, Virginia State College, and Virginia Union
University.
Not even two months after the massive jolt from the Orangeburg
Massacre, another colossal ram smashed into the Black Campus
Movement when Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated in April of
466 IBRAM ROGERS
7/23/2019 On the American Black Campus
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/on-the-american-black-campus 4/11
1968. The violent murder of a nonviolent king of social justice hastened
and intensified the global rebellion in 1968—but probably nowhere as
fiercely as the black student revolt against the American academy. The
death of King was like a magnet that drew black students together,according to James Palcic. Black students held memorial services on
many campuses, like at Cornell, where one black student exclaimed,
‘‘When Martin Luther King died, nonviolence died, baby!’’ They
organized BSUs and/or issued demands at dozens of colleges. Some of
these institutions quickly gave in. Others rejected some or all of the
demands, resulting in black students across America turning to protests
in the fall of 1968, and more so in the spring of 1969.
Some did not wait until the fall to protest. Black campus activists
in the first week after King’s death struck the academy with the first
concerted and widespread blow for diversity in American highereducation history. During the middle two weeks, activism slowed, as
black students gave liberal college officials a chance to satiate the
students and their own guilt. Indiana’s Notre Dame University,
University of Arizona, University of San Francisco, University
Southern California, New York’s Colgate University and St. John’s
University, University of Vermont, University of Wisconsin,
Morehouse College in Georgia, Saint Joseph’s College in
Pennsylvania, Massachusetts’ Bowdoin College, University of Rhode
Island, University of Minnesota, and New York University all
established scholarships and fellowships for black students in memoryof King. The academy tried to make amends for a hundred years of
exclusion. But it was too little too late. In late April, the Black Campus
Movement picked up speed with a protest at one of the academy’s
sentinels, Columbia University in New York.
To compel Columbia to stop the construction of a university
gymnasium in the nearby black community, black and white students
seized Hamilton Hall. Early the next morning of April 24, 1968, black
students told the white students to vacate the hall. The black students
wanted to make it clear they were taking up for the black community inHarlem, notes Stefan Bradley. The hundreds of white students filed out
of Hamilton Hall and in the coming days, groups of white students
took over four other campus buildings to protest against the
gymnasium or other issues. Columbia suspended the construction of
the gym, but the black students wanted it terminated. On April 30, after
seven days of negotiations, the administration brought in one thousand
officers who cleared out the buildings. The internationally reported
actions of these students galvanized the 1968 global student rebellion,
and the Columbia protest has since been championed as one of the
year’s signature protests. The centrality of the widely reported efforts of
THE AMERICAN BLACK CAMPUS 467
7/23/2019 On the American Black Campus
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/on-the-american-black-campus 5/11
Columbia’s black students roused black campus activists across
America. After Columbia, black students knew the time to change
the academy was upon them.
In late April 1968, black campus activists answered the call of history
across the United States and demanded a more relevant educational
experience at Trinity College in Connecticut, Boston University, New
York’s Long Island University, New York City Technical College, and
Ohio State University. In early May 1968, Illinois’s Northwestern
University received a list ordering it to increase its black student
enrollment and financial aid, erect a black dormitory and Black Studies
department, and institutionalize black student participation in decisions
affecting black students. On May 3, 1968, 105 of the university’s 124
black students strolled into the university’s Finance Building as itopened at 7:45 a.m. and remained for the rest of the day. An agreement
was reached the next day, and the black students left with their
demands met. Like the Columbia protest, the successful Northwestern
affair saturated headlines and gave black students the confidence that
they too could win their demands through activism.
Yale’s black students decided against social combat to win a Black
Studies program, however, and in May 1968, organized the first major
symposium on Black Studies. More than one hundred representatives
from thirty-five colleges heard passionate demands and logically
conceived rationales for Black Studies. And, during the symposium, aYale committee became one of the first in the United States to
recommend a divisional major in Afro-American Studies, ultimately
approved in December 1968. The Yale BSU’s choice to work through
traditional channels proved successful. But in May 1968, other BSUs
chose to change the prevailing racist norms through protests at the
University of Chicago, University of Miami, Wisconsin’s Marquette
University, Pennsylvania State University, University of Washington,
Brooklyn College, Pennsylvania’s Cheyney State College, and Delaware
State College.
Additionally, three hundred black and white students in May 1968
seized the administration building at the University of Wisconsin,
Madison in one of the first major campaigns to force an American
university to divest from apartheid South Africa, which became the
major issue of activism among black students in the United States in
late 1970s and early 1980s. Black student-athletes, according to Harry
Edwards, were facing ‘‘brutally dehumanizing, educational and athletic
environments,’’ and also joined the fray of activism in the spring of
1968 at Oklahoma City University, Washington State University,
University of California, Berkeley, California’s San Fernando Valley
468 IBRAM ROGERS
7/23/2019 On the American Black Campus
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/on-the-american-black-campus 6/11
State, New York’s University of Niagara, University of Texas at El
Paso, Brigham Young University in Utah, Michigan State University,
Western Michigan University, and Iowa State University. In all, the
revolt of the black athlete for better college experiences gripped thirty-five campuses in the spring and summer of 1968. More generally, Black
campus activists disturbed more than 150 campuses during the 1967–
1968 academic year, with the vast majority of protests occurring after
King’s death.
Critics and supporters of the Black Campus Movement voiced their
opinions that summer of 1968. Black students did not have much
time to listen. They were too focused on and politicized by the white
backlash from educators, newspapers, and politicians who were passing
measures to curb their activism, the Black Power Movement in theUnited States, the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy in June, and the
police brutality in August at the American Democratic (Party) National
Convention in Chicago. Black campus activists did engage in a few
reformative acts that summer 1968. In a press conference in
Washington, D.C. in June, HBCU student newspaper editors called
for a continued drive to create Black universities, and in August, Black
students demonstrated at California State University, Los Angeles and
Chicago City College. Those student groups were successful in winning
reforms, but those were small victories.
An even larger victory for the Black Campus Movementshowcased that summer when the New York Times reported that many
educators had finally been forced to conclude that the traditional
American curriculum was not properly preparing ‘‘either black or white
students to live in a pluralistic society.’’ There was also substantial
agreement ‘‘among students and professional educators’’ that higher
education, in order to solve its problems, must introduce black courses,
and materials on the black experience in all areas of the curriculum.
Several colleges opened Black Studies programs in the fall of 1968 and
had a record number of black students, among other relevant changes.
This new critical mass was primed to force even more reforms. As one
black student told the New York Times, ‘‘When there were just a
handful of us here, we felt isolated and defenseless in a white world, so
we just went along. But with more black kids coming in each year,
we’ve started getting together and we have a lot more confidence.’’
Before classes began that fall, some administrators took precau-
tions against the possibility of protests. Most were surprised about the
relatively low levels of black campus activism in September 1968, but it
picked up in early October at Chicago’s Crane Junior College,
Wesleyan College in Connecticut, and University of California, Santa
THE AMERICAN BLACK CAMPUS 469
7/23/2019 On the American Black Campus
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/on-the-american-black-campus 7/11
Barbara. Meanwhile, some American black athletes were boycotting
the 1968 Olympics Games to dramatize the oppression of black people.
Kareem Abdul Jabbar, a star center at the University of California, Los
Angeles (UCLA), headlined the boycotters in stature. In his auto-biography, he notes he ‘‘felt no part of the country and had no desire to
help it look good.’’ Some black athletes attended the games and staged
protests there. Tommie Smith and John Carlos, students at California’s
San Jose State College, after winning the gold and bronze medals,
respectively, on October 16, 1968, stepped barefooted with black socks
representing black poverty onto the medal stand and into history.
Smith wore a black scarf signifying black pride, and Carlos wore a
necklace of beads for blacks who had suffered at the hands of white
supremacy. With the Star Spangled Banner playing, the two sprinters
lowered their heads, balled up their fists covered with black gloves, andshot them up in the air for what became known as the Black Power
salute. ‘‘We are black and we are proud of being black,’’ said Smith at a
press conference after the event. ‘‘Black America will understand what
we did tonight.’’
Black America understood, and no segment more than their peers
in college. Resembling the feelings of thousands of black campus
activists, Abdul-Jabbar ‘‘was fiercely proud’’ of Carlos and Smith
‘‘when they made their black-gloved, victory-stand power salute.’’
Inspired, black college athletes intensified their revolt in the fall of 1968
at Nevada Southern University, and San Jose State, and by thebeginning of November, the movement to diversify the academy in
general had hit its stride. On November 4, the BSU at California’s San
Fernando Valley State took over the fifth floor of the administration
building until Acting President Paul Blomgren signed its list of
demands for a Black Studies department, more black students, and
the disarming of campus police, among others.
T
wo days later, another BSU at a California college began a
demonstration. But it would not end as quickly. The SF State BSU,after two years of unsuccessfully traversing traditional channels for a
Black Studies department, decided that if black students could not
receive a relevant education, then nobody would. On November 6, they
initiated what would become a four-and-a-half month student strike—
the longest in American higher education history. By building
relationships and coalescing with other progressive student groups,
politicizing students, obtaining the backing of the Bay Area black
community, and taking advantage of police repression of student
strikers, the SF State BSU was able to compel the majority of the
college’s 18,000 students to not attend classes for almost five months.
470 IBRAM ROGERS
7/23/2019 On the American Black Campus
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/on-the-american-black-campus 8/11
The SF State student strike dominated news, exhilarating and
politicizing black students across America with its magnitude. If a
couple hundred black students could effectively shut down an almost
20,000-student college for more than four months, then the possibilitiesfor black student activism were endless, Black campus activists
reasoned, as they pulled themselves toward the climax of their
movement.
In late November, when the SF State strike was strengthening,
students at Howard held a ‘‘Towards a Black University’’ conference.
The conference’s participants urged a nationwide effort to make
HBCUs more ‘‘relevant to the Black community.’’ The urging came to
fruition, as in late November and early December 1968; Black campus
activists waged protests for more relevant HBCUs at Tennessee’s
Lemoyne-Owen College, Pennsylvania’s Cheyney State College,Mississippi’s Tougaloo College, Maryland’s Coppin State College,
and at the Atlanta University Center. Many of the HBCU adminis-
trators resisted change, forcing the black students to again step up their
level of protests in the spring of 1969. Black students at traditionally
white colleges also jumped on the wave of the black campus movement
sweeping America in late November and December 1968, which would
crash into the heart of the academy in the spring of 1969. They
demanded reforms and organized and waged demonstrations at the
University of California, San Francisco, Minnesota’s St. Cloud State
College, Ohio’s Kent State University, West Virginia’s Bluefield StateCollege, Arizona State University, California State University—
Hayward, New York’s Fordham University, Rhode Island’s Brown
University, Northern Michigan University, Massachusetts’ Radcliffe
College, Portland’s Reed College, San Mateo College and Monterey
Peninsula College in California, Boston’s Grahm Junior College,
Cornell University, Washington University in Missouri, and Wisconsin
State University, Oshkosh.
Black campus activists were concerned with the total reconstitu-
tion of the Eurocentric American academy. They were up against ageneration of conservative, white, and middle-aged trustees generally
opposed to major adjustments and conceding any academic space
without a fight. Black students were up to the challenge and showed an
intense and passionate determination to reorient higher education. That
intensity, that passion, that determination was raised to an unprece-
dented level in 1968 as the struggle closed in on its climax. Since 1965,
Black campus activists had slowly moved toward that apex in their
groundbreaking trek. Due to the politicizing influences of the
Orangeburg Massacre, the assassination of King, and the Black
Power salute at the Olympics, the models of activism at Howard,
THE AMERICAN BLACK CAMPUS 471
7/23/2019 On the American Black Campus
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/on-the-american-black-campus 9/11
Columbia, Northwestern, and SF State, throughout 1968, Black
students organized, demanded, and protested like never before for a
more relevant college experience. As the year was about to end in early
December 1968, Robert Smith, the former president of SF State, saidAmerican higher education ‘‘is at a serious and crucial turning-point.’’
With the momentum they generated in 1968, black campus activists
forced the American academy to turn the corner toward diversity in the
spring of 1969. And, they compelled it to never look back.
In a larger sense, one can view the global struggle of 1968 as the
launch of a worldwide and protracted campaign that has since sought
to undermine all forms of cultural, economic, political, and social
imperialism. Many of the scholarly participants in the United States
have been ideologically and physically positioned in what Fabio Rojas
termed ‘‘oppositional space’’ in American higher education. Thisideological and physical space was initially erected on a massive scale
by the Black Campus Movement. With the tools and strength they
gained in 1968, black campus activists powerfully carved out some
oppositional space in the subsequent years, and with other groups
joining the fray, more space has continued to be created over the last
four decades for the growing intellectual promotion of peace, equality,
and self-determination.
RECOMMENDED READINGS
Abdul-Jabbar, Kareem and Peter Knobler. 1983. Giant Steps. New York: Bantam Books.
Anthony, Earl. 1971. The Time of the Furnaces: A Case Study of Black Student Revolt . New York:
The Dial Press.
Barlow, William and Peter Shapiro. 1971. An End to Silence: The San Francisco State College
Student Movement in the ’60s. New York: Pegasus.
Bell, Daniel Bell. 1969. ‘‘Columbia and the New Left,’’ in James McEvoy and Abraham Miller
(eds.), Black Power and Student Rebellion. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Boren, Mark Edelman. 2001. Student Resistance: A History of the Unruly Subject . New York:
Routledge.
Bradley, Stefan Bradley. 2008. ‘‘‘This is Harlem Heights’: Black Student Power and the 1968
Columbia University Rebellion.’’ Afro-Americans in New York Life and History. (January): 99–
122.Downs, Donald Alexander. 1999. Cornell’69: Liberalism and the Crisis of the American University .
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Edwards, Harry.1970. Black Students. New York: The Free Press.
Glasker, Wayne. 2002. Black Students in the Ivory Tower: African American Student Activism at the
University of Pennsylvania, 1967–1990. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Karagueuzian, Dikran. 1971. Blow It Up!: The Black Student Revolt at San Francisco State and the
Emergence of Dr. Hayakawa. Boston, MA: Gambit.
McCormick, Richard P. 1990. The Black Student Protest Movement at Rutgers. New Brunswick,
NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Nelson, Jackson. 1970. The Orangeburg Massacre. New York: World Publishing Company.
Palcic, James Louis. 1979. ‘‘The History of the Black Student Union at Florida State University’’
(Ph.D. dissertation, Florida State University).
472 IBRAM ROGERS
7/23/2019 On the American Black Campus
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/on-the-american-black-campus 10/11
Peterson, Richard E. 1968. The Scope of Organized Student Protest in 1967–1968. Princeton, NJ:
Educational Testing Service.
Robinson, Armstead L., Craig C. Foster, and Donald H. Ogilvie (eds.). 1969. Black Studies in the
University: A Symposium. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Rojas, Fabio. 2007. From Black Power to Black Studies: How a Radical Social Movement Became
an Academic Discipline. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
Smith, Tommie and David Steele. 2007. Silent Gesture: The Autobiography of Tommie Smith.
Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Turner, Jeffrey Alan. 2000. ‘‘Conscious and Conflict: Patterns in the History of Student Activism
on Southern College Campuses, 1960–1970’’ (Ph.D. dissertation, Tulane University).
Williamson, Joy Ann. 2003. Black Power on Campus: The University of Illinois, 1965–1975.
Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Ibram Rogers is an assistant professor of African American History at SUNY College at Oneonta
in the departments of African & Latino Studies and History. His current research, primarily on the
American mid-century Black Power Movement, has been published in the Journal of Social
History, Phoebe: Gender & Cultural Critiques, the Journal of Pan-African Studies, and the Journal
of Black Studies. E-mail: rogersih@oneonta.edu
THE AMERICAN BLACK CAMPUS 473
7/23/2019 On the American Black Campus
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/on-the-american-black-campus 11/11
Copyright of Peace Review is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to
multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users
may print, download, or email articles for individual use.